In semiconductor manufacturing, plasma processing chambers utilize radio frequency (“RF”) power to generate plasma. Plasma is typically created and maintained by an electric current alternating at an RF frequency, which excites and ionizes the source gas used in the plasma chamber. Plasma processing chambers may be used for industrial processes such as, but not limited to, surface treatment of materials or plasma etching during a semiconductor fabrication process. To achieve efficient power transfer between a RF generator and a plasma load, an impedance-matching network is generally used to match a load impedance to a source impedance (e.g., 50 Ohms).
The plasma chamber presents electrical impedance that may vary greatly and quickly. It is important that the output impedance of the RF power generator be closely matched to the rapidly-changing load impedance of the plasma chamber to avoid damaging reflections of power back into the output circuitry of the RF power generator, which can occur when the impedances are mismatched. Impedance matching devices (e.g., matching networks) are used to match the load impedance of the plasma processing chamber to the output impedance of the RF power generator. For rapidly-varying load impedance, the matching network has to dynamically match the impedance accordingly.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, examples in accordance with the various features described herein may be more readily understood with reference to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, where like reference numerals designate like structural elements.
The description of the different advantageous implementations has been presented for purposes of illustration and is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the implementations in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to a person having ordinary skill in the art. Further, implementations may provide different advantages as compared to other implementations. The implementation or implementations selected are chosen and described to best explain the principles of the implementations, the practical application, and to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to understand the disclosure for various implementations with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Before the present disclosure is described in detail, it is to be understood that, unless otherwise indicated, this disclosure is not limited to specific procedures or articles, whether described or not. It is further to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular implementations only and is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
During plasma processing, a radio frequency (“RF”) generator transmits RF alternating current (“AC”) waves through RF transmission lines and networks to a plasma processing chamber. To provide an efficient transfer of power from the RF generator to the plasma processing chamber, a matching network is employed to transform the time-varying impedance presented by the plasma chamber to the optimal load impedance of the RF generator.
Many RF matching networks have variable capacitors and a control circuit with a microprocessor to control the capacitance values of the variable capacitors. There may be various configurations of RF matching networks. Herein, a vacuum variable capacitor may be defined as an electro-mechanical device which has two concentric metallic rings that are moved in relation to each other to change capacitance. The value and size of the variable capacitors within the RF matching network may be determined by the power handling capability, frequency of operation, and impedance range of the plasma processing chamber.
Pulse-Frequency Modulation is a commonly used technique to deliver power in plasma processing systems. Herein, Pulse-Frequency Modulation Is a modulation method where the amplitude of the carrier waveform is varied between at least two discrete power levels at some frequency with some duty cycle. As such, power delivered in a pulse-waveform may affect plasma characteristics which may therefore cause the electrical impedance of the plasma chamber to vary with each pulse waveform. At the onset of each pulse, a spike in reflected power can result.
Many RF plasma generation systems employ multi-level pulsing for various different power states. Each power state may be associated with a unique impedance because the characteristics of the plasma may change based on the delivered power to the plasma chamber. During plasma processing, the plasma changes occur very quickly (e.g., at a rate of up to hundreds of thousands of Hertz). Many matching networks, such as those that have vacuum variable capacitors, generally react on the order of hundreds or thousands of milliseconds.
Accordingly, many of these matching networks are limited to latching on to one of the multi-level power states (e.g., high or low amplitudes). For example, for dual level pulsing, a matching network may latch on to the high amplitude or to the lower amplitude state and maintain position for the duration of the other state. This means that the system will behave optimally during one state, and sub-optimally for any other states.
The present disclosure provides a mechanism to match to all states by reacting to all impedance states to maintain a low-reflection coefficient during impedance variations. Advantageously, the present disclosure reduces the tuning time in matching networks. Herein, tuning time is defined as the amount of time that it takes for a matching network system to reach a tuned state from a detuned state.
The first-stage matching network 101 may be responsible for matching to high-speed variations in impedance during different stages of a RF waveform and a second-stage matching network 103 may be responsible for high-Q impedance transformations. Accordingly, in several implementations of the present disclosure, the bulk of the impedance tuning is performed by the second-stage matching network 103, for high-Q transformations and the first-stage matching network 101 can be used to tune system impedance for low-Q transformations that arise from a pulsed waveform, changes in chamber conditions, or other factors. Herein, high-speed variation is defined as a change in impedance that is beyond the control loop bandwidth associated with a second-stage matching network.
The first-stage matching network may include fixed capacitors and PIN diodes, silicon-carbide field effect transistors (SiCFETs), metal oxide field effect transistors (MOSFETs), insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs), or bipolar junction transistors (BJTs) electronic switches and the second-stage matching network may include vacuum variable capacitors, or air variable capacitors, and stepper motors, brushed direct current (DC) motors, brushless DC motors, or AC motors.
Advantageously, the hybrid matching system as disclosed herein can reduce the stress on the high-speed, secondary matching network (e.g., the first-stage matching network 103) and can assist in dialing in the matching network to tune the plasma system to a target impedance.
Herein, high Q or low Q refers to a high or low-quality factor. The Q-factor is defined as the ratio of energy stored in a system to the amount of energy dissipated in a system. Q-factor is a dimensionless unit and, for a single element, is expressed as the ratio between the element's reactance and its resistance. In a matching network, the minimum Q-factor is the configuration where the least amount of energy is stored for the transformation to be accomplished.
In some implementations, a high-Q impedance transformation is one that has a Q-factor that is greater than two whereas a low-Q impedance transformation is one that has a Q-factor that is less than two.
The voltage and current sensed at an output (e.g., node 209/215) of the first-stage matching network 201 can be used to direct both stages simultaneously as they act independently. The RF power is delivered by a RF generator to the system input node 208, which is delivered to a plasma chamber (not shown) by way of the hybrid matching network 200.
In the implementation shown, the first-stage matching network 201 includes an impedance transformer 217 with banks 205, 206 of switch terminals 210 (e.g., switched capacitors) on two sides of the impedance transformer 217. Collectively, the impedance transformer 217 and the banks 205, 206 of switch terminals 210 (e.g., switched capacitors) provide the first-stage matching network 201 the flexibility to match impedances, within a specified range. The impedance transformer 217 may include a lumped-element pi network or a distributed network such as a transmission line to achieve the desired impedance transformation. For example, the impedance transformer 217 may include a pi network section to perform both a step-up and step-down impedance transformation to tune to a target impedance.
The specified range of the first stage is a design choice which can be made based on the application and the availability of devices at a given frequency and power level. Choosing a narrow range may limit stress on the first stage for a given frequency and power level, but also limits the applications in which it may be used. Choosing a large range has the opposite consequence. In either case, the system may function similarly.
Accordingly, the present disclosure provides an impedance transformer 217 to be used in conjunction with banks 205, 206 of switch terminals 210 (e.g., switched capacitors) to tune an impedance. The impedance transformer 217 may be realized by inserting a section of a transmission line with appropriate electrical length and characteristic impedance. For example, a quarter-wave impedance transformer may be used to match real impedances. However, a complex load impedance can also be transformed to a real impedance by adding a series or shunt reactive component. Notably, a quarter-wave transformer can provide a match at a particular operating frequency as well as an acceptable match across a bandwidth of one octave, or less, depending on the quality factor, Q, of the transformation and the application.
In the implementation shown in
The banks 205, 206 of switches 212 each include individual (e.g., RF) switch terminal 210 (in each respective banks 205, 206 of switches 212) which include switches 212 and reactive tuning elements 221 which allow the first stage to match a variety of load impedances. In some implementations, a look-up table stored in a memory element (not shown) of the hybrid matching network 200 may be referenced to determine the state of the switches 212 to collectively tune the output impedance of the first stage to a complex conjugate of the calculated input impedance of the second-stage matching network. In the implementation shown in
In addition, a switch actuator 204 is coupled to each switch terminal 210 for each bank 205, 206 of switch terminals 210. Herein, a switch actuator is defined as the portion of the system responsible for bringing a switch terminal 210 into, or out of, the circuit by engaging (e.g. close) or disengaging (e.g. open) the switch 212 in that switch terminal 210. The switch actuator 204 may be coupled to the banks 205, 206 of switch terminals 210 by electrical, magnetic, optical, or mechanical means. In the implementation shown, the switch actuator 204 is coupled to the eight switches 212 in the banks 205, 206 of switch terminals 210. In addition, the switch actuator 204 is coupled to the sensor element 203. The sensor element 203 may operate the switch actuator 204 to engage the first-stage matching network 201.
The state of the switches 212 of the banks 205, 206 of switch terminals 210 may be expressed in a binary format. For example, a first-stage matching network 201 with the switches 212 of bank 205 all being closed and the switches 212 of bank 206 being open may be expressed as [1111 0000]. Likewise, a first-stage matching network 201 with the first half of the switches 212 of banks 205, 206 being open and the second half of the switches 212 of banks 205, 206 being closed may be expressed as [0011 0011]. In one implementation, a look-up table may be used to relate the proper configuration states of the switch terminals 210 to the readings from sensor element 203. In this case, after sensor data has been received and processed, the switch terminals 210 can be actuated to a set of states that minimizes the reflection coefficient (e.g. gamma) at the input 208 of the first stage.
The sensor element 203, as shown, is coupled to an input 215 of the second-stage matching network 202. The sensor element 203 can detect voltage and current, or forward and reflected coupled waves. The sensor element 203 may be a voltage and current sensor, or a bi-directional coupler which detects the voltage, current, forward, or reflected waveforms. In particular, the sensor element 203 measures voltage and current and calculates the relationship between the measured voltage and current in both phase and magnitude. Moreover, the sensor element 203 can detect high-speed variations in plasma chamber impedance and can use the change in impedance caused by the high-speed variations to engage the first-stage matching network 201.
It should be understood by a person having ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that the magnitude ratio and phase relationship of voltage and current waveforms at a particular node in a matching network can be used to direct the tunable elements in an automatic matching network. In this case, a notable aspect is the location of the sensor, and the types of information it gathers. The magnitude ratio and phase relationship of these quantities at the node where sensor element 203 exists in the system allow us to drive the second-stage matching network matching network as well as actuate the switch terminals 210 in the first-stage matching network simultaneously. In this implementation, magnitude and phase are used to drive the tunable elements in the second-stage matching network matching network, and those same values are used to calculate the input impedance to the second-stage matching network, which is the load impedance for the first-stage matching network. When this impedance is computed, the switch terminals 210 are actuated such that the output impedance of the first stage is the complex conjugate of the calculated load impedance. These operations occur simultaneously and independently. As the second-stage matching network self-adjusts its tunable elements to achieve a minimization of gamma looking into its input 215, it is constantly presenting some load at the input to the first stage. Therefore, under any circumstance where the impedance looking into node 215 is approximately the complex conjugate of one of the available configurations of switch terminals 210, the first stage can minimize gamma looking into node 208, which is the input to the hybrid matching system. As the second-stage matching network continuously drives towards minimum gamma at node 215, the first stage can continue to actuate switch terminals 210 to maintain the most optimal impedance match at node 208.
In some implementations, the profile (e.g. shape) of the tunable range 301 can differ from this example. The profile of the tunable range 302 may be determined by the topology of the first-stage matching network and the value of the reactive tuning elements. In this example, the values of reactive tuning elements 221 in switch terminals 210, and the value of the reactive elements 213, 214, 216 in the impedance transformer 217 shown in
Most notably, because the first-stage matching network is a discrete system with a finite number of configurations, the number of switch terminals 210 (see
The tunable range 302 includes an impedance grid 306 of orthogonal arcs 307, 308. Each successive arc represents one increment in the total value of reactance in switch banks 205 and 206 (see
For example, an impedance point 303 within the tunable range 302 lies directly at the intersection of horizontal and vertical impedance arcs 307, 308. Accordingly, the first-stage matching network can tune this load impedance to match a source impedance with a high-degree of precision (e.g., 50+0.3j Ohms for a 50-Ohm source impedance). In contrast, the first-stage matching network can tune a load impedance point 305 to a source impedance with moderate-to-high precision (e.g., 50.5−2.4j Ohms).
In addition, the first-stage matching network of the hybrid matching network can tune a load impedance that is outside of a VSWR 301 but within the tunable range 302. For example, the load impedance represented by impedance point 304, which notably lies directly at the intersection of horizontal and vertical impedance arcs 307, 308, can be tuned directly to the source impedance with high-precision. Accordingly, the load impedance that is directly on arcs 307, 308 of the impedance grid 306 may be tuned directly to a source impedance regardless of the distance the load impedance is from the source impedance.
As previously discussed, the profile of the tunable range 302 may be determined by the total value of the reactive tuning elements 221 (see
In the example shown, the impedance curves 702-704 are associated with the impedance transformation attributed to the device elements of the second-stage matching network of a hybrid matching network. Similarly, the impedance curves 705-707 are associated with the impedance transformation attributed to the device elements of the first-stage matching network of a hybrid matching network. For example, the impedance curves 705-707 are associated with the impedance transformation attributed to capacitors within a first bank of switch terminals (i.e., curve 707), an inductor device element of the impedance transformer (i.e., curve 705), and the capacitors within a second bank of switch terminals (i.e., curve 706) of the first-stage matching network of the hybrid matching network. This example uses the topologies chosen in
In the example, the load impedance 701 of 1−31j is transformed by the second-stage matching network to 28.4+8.2j. When the sensor 203 (see
Still referring to
In addition, if the error signals generated by comparing the magnitudes and phase relationship of voltage and current are above some threshold, then they can be used to tune the variable elements in the second-stage matching network (block 808). If the input impedance at node 215 (see
Although the present disclosure has been described in detail, it should be understood by a person having ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Any use of the words “or” and “and” in respect to features of the disclosure indicates that examples can contain any combination of the listed features, as is appropriate given the context.
While illustrative implementations of the application have been described in detail herein, it is to be understood that the inventive concepts may be otherwise variously embodied and employed, and that the appended claims are intended to be construed to include such variations, except as limited by the prior art.
Reference throughout this specification to “one implementation” or “an implementation” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the implementation is included in at least one implementation of the present disclosure. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one implementation” or “in some implementations” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same implementation. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more implementations.
In the foregoing specification, a detailed description has been given with reference to specific exemplary implementations. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the disclosure as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.
This Application is a divisional application of, incorporates by reference, and claims priority to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/854,022 having the same inventorship and title as the instant application, which is incorporated by reference herein for all applicable purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4679007 | Reese et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
5175472 | Johnson, Jr. et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5195045 | Keane et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5394061 | Fujii | Feb 1995 | A |
5474648 | Patrick et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5576629 | Turner et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5609737 | Fukui et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5629653 | Stimson | May 1997 | A |
5737175 | Grosshart et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5792261 | Hama et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810963 | Tomioka | Sep 1998 | A |
5842154 | Harnett et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849136 | Mintz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5866869 | Schneider | Feb 1999 | A |
5889252 | Williams et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5910886 | Coleman | Jun 1999 | A |
5914974 | Partlo | Jun 1999 | A |
6016131 | Sato et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6157179 | Miermans | Dec 2000 | A |
6164241 | Chen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6252354 | Collins et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6313584 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6313587 | MacLennan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326597 | Lubomirsky et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6407648 | Johnson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6455437 | Davidow et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463875 | Chen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6507155 | Barnes et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6677828 | Harnett et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6703080 | Reyzelman | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6806437 | Oh | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6876155 | Howald et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6894245 | Hoffman | May 2005 | B2 |
6949887 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7030335 | Hoffman | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042311 | Hilliker et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7079597 | Shiraishi et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7102292 | Parsons et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7192505 | Roche et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196283 | Buchberger, Jr. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7215697 | Hill et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220937 | Hoffman | May 2007 | B2 |
7251121 | Bhutta | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259623 | Coleman | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7298128 | Bhutta | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7467612 | Suckewer | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7514936 | Anwar | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7795877 | Radtke | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7796368 | Kotani | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7800368 | Vaughan | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8169162 | Yuzurihara | May 2012 | B2 |
8203372 | Arduini | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8222822 | Gilbert | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8421377 | Kirchmeier | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8466622 | Knaus | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8471746 | Kurunezi et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8491759 | Pipitone et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8742669 | Carter et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8779662 | Boston | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8803424 | Boston | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8884180 | Ilie | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8896391 | du Toit | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8928229 | Boston | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9042121 | Walde et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9065426 | Mason et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9105447 | Brouk et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9111725 | Boston | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9124248 | Van Zyl et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9142388 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9148086 | Fife et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9166481 | Vinciarelli | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9171700 | Gilmore | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9196459 | Bhutta | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9208992 | Brouk et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224579 | Finley et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9225299 | Mueller et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9287098 | Finley et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9294100 | Van Zyl et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9306533 | Mavretic | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9313870 | Walde et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9337804 | Mason et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9345122 | Bhutta | May 2016 | B2 |
9385021 | Chen | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9418822 | Kaneko | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9478397 | Blackburn et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9483066 | Finley et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9490353 | Van Zyl et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9496122 | Bhutta | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9520269 | Finley et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9524854 | Hoffman et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9525412 | Mavretic | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9536713 | Van Zyl et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9543122 | Bhutta | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9544987 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9558917 | Finley et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9577516 | Van Zyl et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9578731 | Van Zyl | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9584090 | Mavretic | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9589767 | Hoffman et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9591739 | Bhutta | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9620340 | Finley et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9651957 | Finley et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9660613 | Van Zyl et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9673028 | Walde et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9697911 | Bhutta | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9711331 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9711335 | Christie et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9728378 | Bhutta et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9729122 | Mavretic | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741544 | Van Zyl et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9745660 | Bhutta | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9748076 | Choi et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9755641 | Bhutta | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9773644 | Van Zyl et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9807863 | Van Zyl et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9812305 | Pelleymounter et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9844127 | Bhutta | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9852890 | Mueller et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9854659 | Van Zyl et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9865432 | Bhutta | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9952297 | Wang | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10008317 | Iyer | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10020752 | Vinciarelli | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10026592 | Chen | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10026594 | Bhutta | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10026595 | Choi et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
RE47026 | Vaughan | Sep 2018 | E |
10074518 | Van Zyl et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10139285 | Murray et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10141788 | Kamstedt | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10194518 | Van Zyl et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10217618 | Larson et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10224184 | Van Zyl et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10224186 | Polak et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10263577 | Van Zyl et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10269540 | Carter et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10314156 | Van Zyl et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10332730 | Christie et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10340879 | Mavretic | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10373811 | Christie et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10374070 | Wood | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10410836 | McChesney | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10411769 | Bae | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10447174 | Porter, Jr. et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10469108 | Howald et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10475622 | Pankratz et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
11107661 | Oliveti | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20030121609 | Ohmi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030150710 | Evans et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030230984 | Kitamura et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040016402 | Walther et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040026235 | Stowell, Jr. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050034811 | Mahoney et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045475 | Watanabe | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050270805 | Yasumura | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005928 | Howald | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060169582 | Brown et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060169584 | Brown et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060249729 | Mundt et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070121267 | Kotani | May 2007 | A1 |
20070222428 | Garvin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080061793 | Anwar et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080061901 | Gilmore | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080087381 | Shannon et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080129298 | Vaughan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080197854 | Valcore et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080272875 | Huang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080317974 | de Vries | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090026964 | Knaus | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090206974 | Meinke | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100012029 | Forester et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100072172 | Ui et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100096261 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098882 | Lubomirsky et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100159120 | Dzengeleski et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110121735 | Penny | May 2011 | A1 |
20110140607 | Moore et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148303 | Van Zyl et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174777 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120097104 | Pipitone et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120097524 | Pipitone et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120145322 | Gushiken et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164834 | Jennings et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120262064 | Nagarkatti et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130002136 | Blackburn et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130140984 | Hirayama | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130180964 | Ilic | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130214683 | Valcore et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130240482 | Nam et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130278140 | Mudunuri et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130345847 | Valcore et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140225504 | Kaneko | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140239813 | Van Zyl | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140265911 | Kamata et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140328027 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140367043 | Bishara et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150002020 | Boston | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150115797 | Yuzurihara | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150150710 | Evans et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150313000 | Thomas et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160002020 | Orita | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160248396 | Mavretic | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160308560 | Howald et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170018349 | Otsubo et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170133886 | Kurs et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170202591 | Shelton, IV | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170338081 | Yamazawa | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170345620 | Coumou et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180034446 | Wood | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180102238 | Gu et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180261431 | Hammond, IV | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190172683 | Mavretic | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190199241 | Murakami et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190385822 | Marakhtanov et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20210013009 | Oliveti | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210386294 | Oliveti | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220076933 | Scullin | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220157581 | Scullin | May 2022 | A1 |
20220167851 | Oliveti | Jun 2022 | A9 |
20220270859 | Poghosyan | Aug 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
04239211 | Aug 1992 | JP |
05284046 | Aug 1993 | JP |
2006-310245 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2010-016124 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2015-502213 | Jan 2015 | JP |
10-2006-0067957 | Jun 2006 | KR |
10-2014-0077866 | Jun 2014 | KR |
10-2017-0127724 | Nov 2017 | KR |
10-2018-0038596 | Apr 2018 | KR |
2012054305 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012054306 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012054307 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2016048449 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016097730 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2019096564 | May 2019 | WO |
2019147513 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2019-244734 | Dec 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2018/062951—International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 28, 2019, 10 pages. |
Stowell, et al., “RF-superimposed DC and pulsed DC sputtering for deposition of transparent conductive oxides”, Thin Solid Films 515 (2007), pp. 7654-7657. |
Bender, et al., “Characterization of a RF=dc-magnetron discharge for the sputter deposition of transparent and highly conductive ITO films”, Appl. Phys. A 69, (1999), pp. 397-409. |
Economou, Demetre J., “Fundamentals and application of ion-ion plasmas”, Applied Surface Science 253 (2007), pp. 6672-6680. |
Godyak et al., “Plasma parameter evolution in a periodically pulsed ICP”, XXVIIth, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, Jul. 18-22, 2005, 4 pages. |
Banna, et al., “Inductively Coupled Pulsed Plasmas in the Presence of Synchronous Pulsed Substrate Bias for Robust, Reliable, and Fine Conductor Etching”, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 37, No. 9, Sep. 2009, pp. 1730-1746. |
Kushner, Mark J., “Pulsed Plasmas as a Method to Improve Uniformity During Materials Processing”, Journal of Applied Physics, Jul. 1, 2004, vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 82-93. |
LTM Technologies, M. Haass “Synchronous Plasma Pulsing for Etch Applications”, Apr. 3, 2010 16 pages. |
PCT/US2020/038892—International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 6, 2020, 3 pages. |
PCT/US2020/038899—International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Sep. 26, 2019, 5 pages. |
PCT/US2021/012847—International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated May 6, 2021, 11 pages. |
PCT/US2021/012849 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated May 10, 2021, 11 pages. |
PCT/US2021/012851 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated May 6, 2021, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210386294 A1 | Dec 2021 | US | |
20220167851 A9 | Jun 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16506373 | Jul 2019 | US |
Child | 17458786 | US |