The present invention relates to planar lightwave circuits (PLC), and in particular to PLCs with reflective diffraction gratings hybridized onto a multi-layer waveguide structure.
In optics, a diffraction grating is an array of fine, parallel, equally spaced grooves (“rulings”) on a reflecting or transparent substrate, which grooves result in diffractive and mutual interference effects that concentrate reflected or transmitted electromagnetic energy in discrete directions, called “orders,” or “spectral orders.”
The groove dimensions and spacings are on the order of the wavelength in question. In the optical regime, in which the use of diffraction gratings is most common, there are many hundreds, or thousands, of grooves per millimeter.
Order zero corresponds to direct transmission or specular reflection. Higher orders result in deviation of the incident beam from the direction predicted by geometric (ray) optics. With a normal angle of incidence, the angle θ, the deviation of the diffracted ray from the direction predicted by geometric optics, is given by the following equation, where m is the spectral order, λ is the wavelength, and d is the spacing between corresponding parts of adjacent grooves:
Because the angle of deviation of the diffracted beam is wavelength-dependent, a diffraction grating is dispersive, i.e. the diffraction grating separates the incident beam spatially into its constituent wavelength components, producing a spectrum.
The spectral orders produced by diffraction gratings may overlap, depending on the spectral content of the incident beam and the number of grooves per unit distance on the grating. The higher the spectral order, the greater the overlap into the next-lower order. Diffraction gratings are often used in monochromators and other optical instruments. By controlling the cross-sectional shape of the grooves, it is possible to concentrate most of the diffracted energy in the order of interest. This technique is called “blazing.”
Originally high resolution diffraction gratings were ruled. The construction of high quality ruling engines was a large undertaking. A later photolithographic technique allows gratings to be created from a holographic interference pattern. Holographic gratings have sinusoidal grooves and so are not as bright, but are preferred in monochromators because they lead to a much lower stray light level than blazed gratings. A copying technique allows high quality replicas to be made from master gratings, this helps to lower costs of gratings.
A planar waveguide reflective diffraction grating includes an array of facets arranged in a regular sequence. The performance of a simple diffraction grating is illustrated with reference to
mλ=Λ(sin θin+sin θout) (1)
From the grating equation (1), the condition for the formation of a diffracted order depends on the wavelength λN of the incident light. When considering the formation of a spectrum, it is necessary to know how the angle of diffraction θNout varies with the incident wavelength θin. Accordingly, by differentiating the equation (1) with respect to θNout, assuming that the angle of incidence θin is fixed, the following equation is derived:
∂θNout/∂λ=m/Λ cos θNout (2)
The quantity dθNout/dλ is the change of the diffraction angle θNout corresponding to a small change of wavelength λ, which is known as the angular dispersion of the diffraction grating. The angular dispersion increases as the order m increases, as the grading pitch Λ decreases, and as the diffraction angle θNout increases. The linear dispersion of a diffraction grating is the product of this term and the effective focal length of the system.
Since light of different wavelengths λN are diffracted at different angles θNout, each order m is drawn out into a spectrum. The number of orders that can be produced by a given diffraction grating is limited by the grating pitch Λ, because θNout cannot exceed 90°. The highest order is given by Λ/λN. Consequently, a coarse grating (with large Λ) produces many orders while a fine grating may produce only one or two.
A blazed grating is one in which the grooves of the diffraction grating are controlled to form right triangles with a blaze angle w, as shown in
Planar waveguide diffraction based devices provide excellent performance in the near-IR (1550 nm) region for Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM). In particular, advancements in Echelle gratings, which usually operate at high diffraction orders (40 to 80), high angles of incidence (approx 60°) and large grading pitches, have lead to large phase differences between interfering paths. Because the size of grating facets scales with the diffraction order, it has long been considered that such large phase differences are a necessity for the reliable manufacturing of diffraction-based planar waveguide devices. Thus, existing devices are limited to operation over small wavelength ranges due to the high diffraction orders required.
Reflective diffraction gratings, etched directly into a planar lightwave circuit, are often used as wavelength filters due to their high performance and small size. Conventional PLCs can be fabricated on a number of different types of substrates, including silica-on-silicon, silicon-on-insulator (SOI), or indium phosphide (InP). A typical configuration of a diffraction grating filter formed at a side of a slab waveguide is shown in
Another system is, illustrated in
The diffraction grating 10, as defined in U.S. Pat. No. 7,151,635 issued Dec. 19, 2006 to Enablence Technologies Inc, which is incorporated herein by reference, and as illustrated in
One of the greatest challenges in fabricating a reflective diffraction grating, such as that shown in
Unfortunately, in most etch processes there is typically a tradeoff in terms of etch verticality versus roughness of the etched wall, contrary to what is necessary for making a good grating. This is true in most material systems; however, recent developments in Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE) of Silicon have allowed for extremely deep, vertical, smooth etches, when implemented in silicon only. The DRIE process has become very common for use in MEMs components and many other applications.
However, using silicon as a PLC waveguide is very restrictive, and typically results in a low-performance component. To achieve the high-performance, low-loss components required in modern telecommunication systems, most PLC filter chips are fabricated in silica-on-silicon substrates, where the light travels only in a thin glass layer on top of the silicon. DRIE technology can be applied to silica wafers, but the etch results are not nearly as good as those found in silicon. For that reason, virtually all reflective diffraction gratings etched in silica suffer from performance problems associated with the verticality and/or roughness of the etched mirrors.
An object of the present invention is to overcome the shortcomings of the prior art by providing a hybrid PLC device in which a highly precise diffraction grating is manufactured separately from a high quality waveguide structure.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to a planar lightwave circuit (PLC) device comprising:
an input port for launching an input beam of light;
a slab waveguide on a first substrate, defining a core layer between upper and lower cladding, having a trench formed therein down to the core layer;
a reflective diffraction grating on a second substrate mounted in the trench for diffracting the input beam of light; and
a first output port for outputting at least a portion of the input beam of light;
wherein the core layer and the reflective diffraction grating are formed separately of different materials;
whereby the reflective optical device is etched with higher precision than possible in the slab waveguide.
Another embodiment of the present invention relates to a method of forming a planar lightwave circuit comprising the steps of:
a) forming a slab waveguide on a first substrate including a core layer between upper and lower cladding;
b) forming a trench in the slab waveguide down to the core layer;
c) forming a diffraction grating on a second substrate; and
d) mounting the diffraction grating in the trench.
The invention will be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings which represent preferred embodiments thereof, wherein:
a is a top view of a alternate embodiment of a reflective diffraction grating of the device of
b is a side view of the reflective diffraction grating of
a is a top view of an alternate embodiment of a reflective diffraction grating of the device of
b is a side view of the reflective diffraction grating of
With reference to
On a separate wafer grating chip 29, using a pure substrate 31 of a material different than the core layer 22, e.g. silicon, a silicon based material or an indium-phosphide (InP) material, the intended grating 28 is etched using an advanced etching system with much higher precision, e.g. DRIE system, which results in very vertical, smooth sidewalls for the teeth of the grating 28. A thin layer of a reflective material, such as gold, is deposited on the grating 28 to create highly-reflective teeth sidewalls. Since the triangular teeth of the grating 28 are relatively small, typically several thousand such gratings will fit on a standard 6″ silicon wafer. Preferably, the grating 28 is similar or identical to the above-identified diffraction grating 10 for separating an input optical beam into a plurality, e.g. up to 8, 16, 40 or more, of constituent wavelength channels.
The gratings 28 are diced out, flipped, and inserted in the etched trench 27 on the silica PLC chip 21. The entire process is typically done using an automated flip-chip bonder, which aligns the grating chip 29 to the PLC substrate 26, drops the grating 28 into position in the trench 27, and completes a solder bonding process, which involves placing solder 32 between corresponding solder pads on the substrate 31 and the PLC chip 21 or by simply heating up an exists solder bump pre-positioned therebetween, to lock the grating chip 29 in place on the PLC chip 21.
Light traveling towards the grating 28 would normally experience a high loss due to scattering at the rough trench 27 etched in the silica PLC chip 21; however, to eliminate the loss, an index-matching epoxy 35 is dispensed near one end of the grating trench 27. The grating chip 29 and the trench 27 are designed, e.g. with a constant gap therebetween, so that the epoxy 35 will wick across the thin spacing between the grating 28 and the etched silica wall of the trench 27, completely filling all cracks, effectively submerging the grating 28 in the silica trench 27. The index-matching epoxy 35 is then cured, for example through a 100° C. bake, during which the epoxy 35 cures to a refractive index nearly identical to that of the waveguide material, e.g. silica, used in the core 22 of the PLC chip 21, thereby eliminating any optical interface in the waveguide material, including all the roughness and non-verticality of the trench 27, creating a continuous refractive index through the silica chip 21 directly to the reflective grating 28.
Accordingly, a hybrid PLC device using very low-loss silica or other high quality waveguiding material is created, while also taking advantage of the DRIE capabilities available using silicon or other high precision etching material to construct a highly precise or smooth optical grating 28. The result is the best of both material systems, hybridly integrated to form one component.
The proposed configuration can also be implemented for a different number of material systems and grating configurations. As well as for reflective gratings and concave reflective grating, the same technique can be used for creating efficient mirrors, in particular a very smooth concave, curved or parabolic mirror, by replacing the grating chip 29 with another chip having one or more reflective or at least partially reflective surfaces for efficiently routing light around tight corners in a PLC chip.
One of the most effective applications of such a filter is for fabricating a diplexer or triplexer for the access telecommunication market, in particular those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,068,885 issued Jun. 27, 2006 to Bidnyk et al, U.S. Pat. No. 7,149,387 issued Dec. 12, 2006 to Balakrishnan et al, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,209,612 issued Apr. 24, 2007 to Pearson et al, which are all incorporated herein by reference, including a stepped diffraction grating having triangular teeth with alternating reflective faces and non-reflecting sidewalls, such as the one disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,151,635 issued Dec. 19, 2006 to Enablence Technologies Inc, which is incorporated herein by reference. The diffraction grating disclosed in the Enablence patent requires a sidewall length S, which is less than or equal to two times the average wavelength of the input light, e.g. 1550 nm, and preferably less than or equal to the average wavelength of the input light, for the which the grating 28 is designed to multiplex/demultiplex. Furthermore, an aspect ratio of the diffraction grating, defined by the facet length divided by the sidewall length, is greater than 3, preferably greater than 5, and more preferably greater than 10. The aforementioned specifications require highly accurate manufacturing processes, which are difficult to achieve in silica on silicon structures, but achievable in deep reactive ion etching of silicon.
Preferably, the grating chip 29 includes a single-crystal silicon, silicon-based or InP substrate, etched using a Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE) process. The DRIE process is relatively standard and readily available from wafer foundries throughout the world, and typically uses an etch process which alternates between a silicon etching plasma (SF6) and a passivating plasma (C4F8), which results in very high aspect ratio wells, with smooth, vertical etching of the grating 28.
The grating wafer, since it comprises only the gratings 28 themselves, can contain a very high number of grating chips 29, often several thousand on a standard 6″ wafer. The single-layer etch process can be used for defining the grating 28 and alignment marks 41, as shown in
For gratings 28 that are hybridly attached to a PLC chip 21, as shown in
A similar technique to that shown in
An example application of the present invention is for hybrid filter chips used to separate wavelengths of light in a telecommunications system. A triplexer, such as the ones disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,068,885, used in fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) systems would be one such component, wherein the hybrid grating 2 is used to separate different upstream and/or downstream wavelengths.
This invention relaxes many of the very challenging etch requirements associated with planar lightwave circuit (PLC) reflective grating technologies, which have been a major issue for wafer foundries in the past. It transfers these etch requirements to a hybrid grating, which can take advantage of new DRIE technologies in silicon. This results in lower wafer fabrication costs, and a waveguide process which is much more simple and easily portable to other foundries.
The present invention overcomes the shortcomings of the prior art, by hybridly integrating a low-loss silica waveguide PLC 1, with a high-quality DRIE-etched, silicon grating 2. The hybrid integration is made possible by modern flip-chip bonding techniques that are typically used for attaching lasers and detectors onto PLC substrates. In addition, the present invention provides a means for intentionally altering the verticality of the grating during bonding.
The present invention claims priority from U.S. Patent Application No. 60/828,080 filed Oct. 4, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference. The present application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/143,800 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,304,797, filed Jun. 3, 2005, which claimed priority from U.S. Patent Application 60/576,594 filed Jun. 4, 2004, and which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/971,129 filed Oct. 25, 2004 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,151,635 on Dec. 19, 2006, which claimed priority from U.S. Patent Application 60/555,697 filed Mar. 24, 2004, which are all incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4935930 | Handa | Jun 1990 | A |
5799118 | Ogusu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6134359 | Keyworth et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6542685 | Yoneda | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6937797 | Mizuno et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6959129 | He et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7068885 | Bidnyk et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7149387 | Balakrishnan et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151635 | Bidnyk et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7209612 | Balakrishnan et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7304797 | Balakrishnan et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7561765 | Funabashi et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20030118288 | Korenaga et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20060093002 | Park et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20080240654 | Pearson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0649041 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0905533 | Mar 1999 | EP |
9950700 | Oct 1999 | WO |
2005009131 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080240654 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60828080 | Oct 2006 | US | |
60576594 | Jun 2004 | US | |
60555697 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11143800 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 11865290 | US | |
Parent | 10971129 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 11143800 | US |