The present invention relates generally to fasteners and more particularly to a hybrid three-point drive fastener for transmitting torque from a tool to the fastener.
Fasteners are used in numerous applications to join components together. Typically, a fastener has at least a threaded portion and a bearing portion with one or more bearing surfaces attached to the threaded portion. The bearing portion is designed to receive torque from a tool, such as a socket or wrench, which is used to tighten or loosen the fastener. In a conventional fastener, such as a nut, the fastener may have internal threads and six bearing surfaces oriented in a hexagon shape around the internal threads. However, other fasteners may have external threads, such as bolts and screws. Some tools to apply torque to threaded fasteners are six-point hexagon or twelve-point hexagon-like geometry sockets and six-lobe or enhanced six-lobe (also known as hexalobular, Torx®, or star) sockets.
In order to mistake-proof a joint assembly process by preventing an incorrect fastener being used in a critical joint application, a manufacturer will typically oversize the hexagon bearing portion of the correct fastener and supply the assembly operator with a socket that matches the oversized hexagon bearing portion. This decreases the likelihood that an incorrect fastener, with a standard sized bearing portion, will be used during assembly. For example, the correct nut for a joint assembly may have a 16 mm hexagon bearing portion, whereas a standard M10 nut has a 15 mm hexagon bearing portion. The assembly operator would have a 16 mm hexagon socket to install the correct nut. The 16 mm hexagon socket would not fit well on the incorrect M10 nut, which decreases the likelihood of the operator using the incorrect M10 nut. However, this typical practice of oversizing the bearing portion of the correct fastener has disadvantages. First, the correct fastener will weigh more due to the extra material in the oversized bearing portion. For example, the weight of a hexagon flange nut increases by approximately 12% by designing the nut with a larger hexagon bearing portion. Second, the correct fastener will cost more due to the extra material in the oversized bearing portion. For example, the cost of a hexagon flange nut with a larger hexagon bearing portion is 12% higher or more due to higher material costs, heat treating costs, plating costs, and packaging costs. Third, it is still possible for the assembly operator to install the incorrect fastener (with a standard sized bearing portion) with the larger, correct socket. For example,
In the fastener industry there is a growing need to mistake-proof assembly processes in order to improve efficiency and reduce costs. There is also a trend towards decreasing the weight of fasteners to increase gas mileage of combustion driven vehicles and battery life of electric driven vehicles. Also, some mechanics may not have the special tools needed to remove all the fasteners with non-standard bearing portion shapes and features.
In one embodiment, a fastener comprises a threaded portion and a first bearing portion designed to receive torque from a first tool and transmit torque to the threaded portion. The first bearing portion comprises three pairs of first bearing surfaces, where each pair of first bearing surfaces is equally spaced apart from each other pair of first bearing surfaces. The fastener also comprises a second bearing portion designed to receive torque from a second tool and transmit torque to the threaded portion. The second bearing portion comprises six concave bearing surfaces. Each pair of the first bearings surfaces is disposed between two of the concave bearing surfaces. The fastener also comprises a non-bearing portion. The non-bearing portion comprises three convex non-bearing surfaces, where each convex non-bearing surface is disposed between two of the pairs of first bearing surfaces and between two of the concave bearing surfaces.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like referenced numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
Referring now to the figures,
Fastener 100 may include a first torque bearing portion 104. The torque bearing portion 104 may extend the entire axial length of fastener 100 or may only extend along part of the axial length of fastener 100. Bearing portion 104 may include three pairs of torque bearing surfaces 106, 108, 110 that may be designed to receive torque from a tool, such as a six-point hexagon socket, twelve-point hexagon-like geometry socket, or wrench, and transmit torque to the threaded portion 102.
Each pair of torque bearing surfaces 106, 108, 110 may include two torque bearing sides with an edge 112, 114, 116 between the sides. Torque bearing surface 106 may include torque bearing sides 106a and 106b with edge 112 between the sides. Torque bearing surface 108 may include torque bearing sides 108a and 108b with edge 114 between the sides. Torque bearing surface 110 may include torque bearing sides 110a and 110b with edge 116 between the sides. The height of each torque bearing side 106a, 106b, 108a, 108b, 110a, 110b may be the height of the bearing portion 104 in an axial direction. Each torque bearing side 106a, 106b, 108a, 108b, 110a, 110b may be designed to receive torque from a tool, such as a hexagon socket or wrench, and transmit torque to the threaded portion 102 depending if the tool is tightening or loosening fastener 100. For example, if the tool is tightening fastener 100, torque bearing sides 106a, 108a, 110a may receive torque from the tool and transfer the torque to the threaded portion 102. Whereas if the tool is loosening fastener 100, torque bearing sides 106b, 108b, 110b may receive torque from the tool and transfer the torque to the threaded portion 102. The torque bearing side that receives and transfers torque when fastener 100 is being tightened or loosened may be switched depending on the direction of the threads in threaded portion 102.
Edges 112, 114, 116 may extend the entire axial length of bearing portion 104. Edges 112, 114, 116 may be located at the mid-point of torque bearing surface 106, 108, 110, respectively, such that the widths of each corresponding torque bearing side 106a, 106b, 108a, 108b, 110a, 110b are the same. For example, the widths of torque bearing sides 106a and 106b may be the same. Alternatively, the widths of any or all of the torque bearing sides may be different than any or all of the other torque bearing sides.
Fastener 100 may be designed and shaped to be driven by standard socket tools, such as a hexagon socket or a 12 point configuration socket. Accordingly, the angle at edges 112, 114, 116 where the torque bearing sides intersect may be approximately 120 degrees to match the angle of a standard six-point hexagon or twelve-point hexagon-like geometry sockets. Additionally, the edges 112, 114, 116 may be approximately equally spaced around the longitudinal axis of fastener 100 to match a standard six-point hexagon or twelve-point hexagon-like geometry sockets.
Fastener 100 may include a second torque bearing portion 118. The torque bearing portion 118 may extend the entire axial length of fastener 100 or may only extend along part of the axial length of fastener 100. Bearing portion 118 may include six torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130 that may be designed to receive torque from a tool, such as a six-lobe or enhanced six-lobe socket, and transmit torque to the threaded portion 102. Bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130 may be a concave shape in order to fit the lobes of a six-lobe or enhanced six-lobe socket. The height of each torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130 may be the height of the bearing portion 118 in an axial direction.
Each torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130 may be designed to receive torque from a tool, such as a six-lobe or enhanced six-lobe socket, and transmit torque to the threaded portion 102 depending if the tool is tightening or loosening fastener 100. For example, if the tool is tightening fastener 100, torque bearing surfaces 120, 124, 128 may receive torque from the tool and transfer the torque to the threaded portion 102. Whereas if the tool is loosening fastener 100, torque bearing surfaces 122, 126, 130 may receive torque from the tool and transfer the torque to the threaded portion 102. The torque bearing surface that receives and transfers torque when fastener 100 is being tightened or loosened may be switched depending on the direction of the threads in threaded portion 102.
Fastener 100 may include a non-torque bearing portion 132. Non-torque bearing portion 132 may include three non-torque bearing surfaces 134, 136, 138. The non-torque bearing surfaces 134, 136, 138 may not be intended to receive and transfer torque from a tool to the threaded portion 102. The non-torque bearing surfaces 134, 136, 138 may, however, incidentally receive and transfer torque from a tool to the threaded portion 102 even if the non-torque bearing surfaces 134, 136, 138 are not intended to do so.
The non-torque bearing portion 132 may be a convex shape. The wall thickness of non-torque bearing portion 132 between threaded portion 102 and non-torque bearing surfaces 134, 136, 138, respectively, may be uniformly thick (excluding the thickness of the threads) and sufficient to support the threads in threaded portion 102.
The non-torque bearing surfaces 134, 136, 138 and torque bearing surfaces 106, 108, 110 may be located adjacent to and between the torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, as shown in
The hybrid three-point drive fastener, such as fastener 100, can be installed and removed with a standard enhanced six-lobe socket 140.
The hybrid three-point drive fastener, such as fastener 100, can be removed in the field with a standard enhanced six-lobe socket 140 or standard six-point hexagon socket 144 or standard twelve-point hexagon-like geometry socket 146. Removal of the hybrid three-point drive fastener, such as fastener 100, with a standard six-point hexagon socket 144 or standard twelve-point hexagon-like geometry socket 146 is useful when the fastener needs to be removed for service and the operator does not have an enhanced six-lobe socket.
Utilizing a hybrid three-point drive fastener may mistake-proof a joint assembly process by preventing an incorrect fastener being used. An assembly operator installing a hybrid three-point drive fastener can use an enhanced six-lobe socket to install the fastener, as discussed above. However, an incorrect hexagon fastener cannot be installed with an enhanced six-lobe socket because the hexagon fastener will not fit within the enhanced six-lobe socket. By using an enhanced six-lobe socket 140, the operator cannot inadvertently install a standard hexagon fastener.
While several embodiments of the fastener has been described, it should be understood that the fasteners are not so limited, and modifications may be made without departing from the disclosures herein. While each embodiment described herein may refer only to certain features and may not specifically refer to every feature described with respect to other embodiments, it should be recognized that the features described herein are interchangeable unless described otherwise, even where no reference is made to a specific feature. It should also be understood that the advantages described above are not necessarily the only advantages of the fastener, and it is not necessarily expected that all of the described advantages will be achieved with every embodiment of the fasteners. The scope of the disclosure is defined by the appended claims, and all devices and methods that come within the meaning of the claims, either literally or by equivalence, are intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2248695 | Bradshaw | Jul 1941 | A |
2969250 | Kull | Jan 1961 | A |
3003379 | Pribitzer | Oct 1961 | A |
3277942 | Marion | Oct 1966 | A |
3396765 | Ridenour | Aug 1968 | A |
3400626 | Bergere | Sep 1968 | A |
3456548 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
3584667 | Reiland | Jun 1971 | A |
3885480 | Muenchinger | May 1975 | A |
4006660 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4260005 | Stencel | Apr 1981 | A |
4361412 | Stolarczyk | Nov 1982 | A |
4459074 | Capuano | Jul 1984 | A |
4938731 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5019080 | Hemer | May 1991 | A |
5378101 | Olson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5577871 | Brugola | Nov 1996 | A |
5674036 | Hsieh | Oct 1997 | A |
6343531 | Amis | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6632057 | Fauchet | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6655888 | Schultz | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6736580 | Schultz | May 2004 | B2 |
7073416 | Kozak et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7108510 | Niznick | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7128513 | Walker | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7207248 | Panasik et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225710 | Pacheco, Jr. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7331743 | Schultz | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331744 | Schultz | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7568872 | Schultz | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7857563 | Pratt | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8291795 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8429875 | Bartlett | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8454288 | Hui | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8616097 | Hughes et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8747044 | Garver | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8997608 | Merrick | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9138873 | Merrick | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9278434 | Merrick | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9624962 | Unseld | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9644660 | Garver | May 2017 | B2 |
9662775 | Merrick | May 2017 | B2 |
9868188 | Merrick | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9957993 | Pritchard | May 2018 | B2 |
9964133 | Bjelobradic et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10071466 | Wilson | Sep 2018 | B2 |
20030044257 | Siegel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030158555 | Sanders et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20060062650 | Keener | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060266168 | Pacheco, Jr. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090220321 | Sakamura | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090285653 | Schultz | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20130286668 | Ishida et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150343615 | Merrick | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160131170 | Landsmann | May 2016 | A1 |
20160252125 | Lares | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160273591 | Goss | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160312816 | Bjelobradic et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170050300 | Lukes et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20180003241 | Goss | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180193986 | Tissieres | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180298933 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203 21 249 | Oct 2006 | DE |
0 926 362 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 961 042 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1 162 376 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1 632 683 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2 022 992 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2 363 245 | Sep 2011 | EP |
1 765 214 | May 2016 | EP |
3 115 153 | Jan 2017 | EP |
3 388 694 | Oct 2018 | EP |
2 361 568 | Mar 1978 | FR |
1 564 684 | Feb 1978 | GB |
WO 2003062650 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2003068093 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2004005731 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2005082641 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006130490 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2010014881 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2015086196 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 2016149526 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19151847.1 dated Jun. 5, 2019 (7 pages). |
“Torx Plus Drive System;” Infastech Intellectual Properties Pte. Ltd.; 2011; 15p; Decorah, IA. |
Rudd, Matthew; Patentability Search for “Hybrid 6-Lobe—Hex Nut/Bolt;” Cardinal Intellectual Property; Nov. 23, 2016; 11p; Evanston, IL. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190219089 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |