Previous rotational systems for rotating large parabolic trough solar collectors to allow them to track the movement of the sun across the sky used a variety of equipment configurations including: (1) motorized gearboxes (e.g. worm gear drive units) to provide the slow-movement, high-torque output needed for precise sun tracking (for example, the Luz Solar-1 (LS-1) and Luz Solar-2 (LS-2) solar collectors of the California Luz company installed at the large solar electric generation station (SEGS) systems in California used worm gear drive units); (2) hydraulic cylinders (which elongate in a linear fashion when pressurized by hydraulic fluid) arranged in a mechanical system that converts the linear motion of the cylinders into the desired rotational motion; and (3) rack-and-pinion rotary actuators (that provide for rotation during sunny normal-operating conditions) along with a companion mechanical locking system that provides enough added strength to resist the very high torques produced by the solar collectors during high wind conditions.
However, these prior systems had a number of disadvantages. For example motorized gearboxes (used in the early SEGS systems installed in the mid-to-late 1980s in California) had two main disadvantages. First, these high-reduction systems use worm gearing, a gear arrangement in which a worm, which is a gear in the form of a screw, meshes with a worm gear. This approach is imprecise owing to significant “backlash” inherent in worm gearing. Second, the contact area between the worm and the worm gear is quite small. This small contact area results in extremely limited overload capability. To raise the overload capability, the size of the gearing must be increased substantially, which substantially increases costs.
Hydraulic cylinders can be more precise than gearboxes, since they do not have backlash problems. The rod of the hydraulic cylinder extends (or contracts) as pressurized fluid is pumped into one side (or the other) of the piston inside the cylinder. But a hydraulic cylinder is a linear device, and even when arranged as a mechanical linkage it cannot provide the desired rotation range of 180 to 240 degrees (and generally is not used when a rotation range over 120 degrees is needed) owing to physical limitations of linkages. So, to achieve the rotation range that is needed by parabolic trough collectors, two linear cylinders are used in combination. This results in a complicated mechanical system, which is expensive. This kind of complicated system has been used on systems in the U.S. (the SEGS 8 and 9 solar projects in Harper Lake, Calif., as well as some projects in Europe).
Hydraulic rack and pinion rotary actuators (for example as used at a recently completed parabolic trough system in Nevada) do indeed directly provide rotational output, but these rack-and-pinion actuators have very limited rotational overload capability. This limited overload capability is the result of the small amount of contact area between the pinion gear and the gear rack. The high forces produced during high wind events, when reacted to by the small amount of contact area between the pinion gear and the gear rack, result in gear contact pressures that are too high for the gearing to withstand. In practice, to compensate for the very limited overload capability of the rack and pinion gearing, another external locking device is added that can handle these high forces, which eliminates the need for the rack-and-pinion gearing to handle these very high contact pressures. This external locking device adds significant cost, adds complexity, and has been found to be difficult to employ with reliability in actual field operations.
The following U.S. patents are believed relevant to aspects of this disclosure: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,511,134, 3,548,866, 3,559,534, 4,161,905, 4,328,789, 4,628,692, 4,739,620, 5,138,838, 5,531,216, 5,806,553, 6,123,067, 6,662,801, and 6,772,671. All patents and publications referred to herein and all patents and publications submitted herewith, are incorporated herein by reference to the extent not inconsistent herewith for purposes of written description and enablement.
The foregoing examples of the related art and its limitations are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings.
A cost-effective solution to the need for a system for rotating solar collectors is provided herein. The system can provide sun-tracking rotation to parabolic solar trough collectors, to parabolic dish collectors, which are large solar collector concentrators in the shape of “parabolas of revolution,” other linear focusing solar collectors such as linear Fresnel reflectors, as well as large photovoltaic solar energy collectors that are designed to follow the sun's motion across the sky. Such collectors require a rotary actuation device that has precise positioning requirements and modest torque requirements during normal sunny time periods, but occasionally must resist very high wind loads when they are in a static/stow position (for example, in the event of an extreme 80+ mph wind).
It has been discovered that the deficiencies of previous collector-rotation systems become economically important when large-scale solar fields in areas where high temperatures and high winds occur. The present system overcomes these deficiencies in a simple and efficient way by fulfilling three key requirements in one system: a) accurate rotation of a large parabolic trough solar collector to follow the sun's movement across the sky from horizon to horizon during normal sunny days, requiring 180 degrees of rotation; b) the ability to withstand very high overturning moment loads (when the collector is in a static, low-profile, downward-facing position, referred to herein as the “stow” position) without mechanical failure during extreme high-wind conditions; and c) the ability to lock in place when high internal pressure (for example above about 6000 psi) is caused by high winds, but to relieve pressure (unlock) when high internal actuator pressure (again, for example above about 6000 psi) is caused by an increase in outdoor ambient temperature.
The system provided herein achieves the purposes of precise but high-torque rotary motion with very high overload capability, and with the ability to lock the solar collector in place in a low-profile, downward-facing “stow” position under high winds, yet to also keep the collector unlocked when high internal pressures are caused by significant increases in outdoor temperatures, all in a cost effective way. “High winds” as used herein means winds of at least about 30-45 mph, and “high torque” means sufficient torque to rotate the collector into stow position under such high winds of about 30 to 45 mph. “Very high winds” as used herein means high winds up to about 80 mph or more. “Very high overload capacity,” means sufficient resistance to prevent the collector from moving out of stow position under very high wind conditions. A hydraulic-based rotary actuator is provided that has high torque and very high overload capacity during a static condition (that is, a non-moving overnight/stow position of the solar collector), and has a control system comprising hydraulic components such as pressure-sensing devices, valves and controls, that provide locking of the actuator even when high pressures are developed within the actuator at times of very high winds without relieving these high hydraulic fluid pressures (which would defeat the lock feature). In addition, the control system allows for the relief of high pressures within the actuator that results when, for example, thermal expansion of the hydraulic fluid inside the actuator occurs from a significant increase in outdoor ambient temperature. Advantageously, the actuator provides sufficient torque to move the solar collector to the “stow” position under, for example, 30-45 mph winds. When the wind velocity rises above 30 mph the collectors are generally programmed or operated to begin moving to the stow position, so as to be safely stowed during times of very high winds, such as 80 mph.
The hydraulic system provided herein has a number of advantages over previously-known systems. First, the helically-geared hydraulic rotary actuator that provides the torque output for rotation of the trough collectors allows for very precise and accurate rotational movements, ensuring that the collectors can accurately track the sun. Second, this same hydraulic device, which has enough torque output to rotate the collector to follow the sun's movement throughout the day during normal sunny time periods, also has enough torsional strength to stay locked in place and resist the very high torque loads that are imparted into the hydraulic device during times of very high winds. Third, the helically-geared rotary actuator has a very high level of overload capability, so there is no need for an external mechanical locking apparatus to resist the high torque loads caused by very high winds. Fourth, the system is cost effective, since an external mechanical locking apparatus is not needed. Fifth, the hydraulic unit has the ability to lock in place when high internal actuator pressure (for example, above about 6000 psi) is caused by high winds, but to relieve pressure (unlock) when high internal actuator pressure (again, for example above about 6000 psi) is caused by an increase in outdoor ambient temperature.
A helically-geared hydraulically-driven rotary actuator has not previously been used in the art for providing sun-tracking rotation to solar collectors, although others have used other types of rotary actuators for providing sun-tracking rotation to solar collectors, and some have been hydraulically powered. In addition a helically-geared hydraulically-driven rotary actuator in combination with a control system comprising a hydraulic-based assembly of components that provides for locking of the actuator against high winds has not previously been used. Locking means the actuator will not “let go” and release the pressure, which would allow the collector to rotate as a result of the wind, at significant risk of harm to the equipment and personnel in the field. In addition, the assembly of components provided herein also allows for pressure relief of the actuator when thermal expansion of the hydraulic fluid in the actuator causes a pressure above a selected level in the actuator, yet, it distinguishes between this event (for example as caused by a significant increase on outdoor ambient temperature) and the high internal pressures that occur during high winds.
The rotational actuator system for controlling rotation of a parabolic solar collector comprises: a bi-directional hydraulic rotational actuator; and a control system hydraulically connected to the actuator; wherein the actuator is capable of exerting at least about 250,000 in-lb and advantageously at least about 380,000 in-lb, of torque up to about 550,000 in-lb, and advantageously up to about 750,000 in-lb of torque. Advantageously, the actuator is capable of rotating through an arc greater than about 180 degrees, for example through an arc of at least to about 240 degrees, so as to allow the solar collector to track the sun (typically through a 180-degree arc) and also to be further rotated into locked-down stow position at night or during high wind conditions, other weather conditions that might damage the collector, or when it is desired that the solar collector not be in use. The actuator must be able to exert sufficient force to rotate large solar collectors of the type described herein that are operationally attached thereto to rotate into stow position under high wind conditions.
The actuator system provided herein comprises means for locking rotation of the actuator under high wind conditions when the solar collector is in stow position and/or for relieving pressure in the system under high temperature conditions.
In embodiments, the system comprises a bi-directional hydraulic rotational actuator; a control system hydraulically connected to said actuator; and automatic means for locking said actuator in stow position under high wind conditions, e.g., about 30 to about 45 mph and advantageously up to at least about 80 mph. The actuator is capable of exerting between about 250,000 in-lb of torque and about 750,000 in-lb of torque, and is capable of rotating through an arc having a selected upper limit of about 180 to about 240 degrees.
The rotational actuator advantageously comprises: a through-shaft having first and second ends and comprising first helical gear teeth; a piston having an inner circumference comprising second helical gear teeth configured to mesh with the first helical gear teeth; and an outer circumference comprising third helical gear teeth; a housing at least partially surrounding the through-shaft and the piston, the housing having an inner surface comprising fourth helical gear teeth configured to mesh with the third helical gear teeth; a first port through the housing for receiving hydraulic fluid, the first port being positioned such that pressure from hydraulic fluid introduced into the housing through the first port causes the piston to move in a first direction away from the first port; and a second port for receiving hydraulic fluid; the second port being positioned such that pressure from hydraulic fluid introduced into the housing through the second port causes the piston to move in a second direction away from the second port; such that when hydraulic fluid is entering the actuator through the first port, the through-shaft rotates in a first direction and when hydraulic fluid is entering the actuator through the second port, the through-shaft rotates in a second direction; and when no hydraulic fluid is being pumped into the actuator, the actuator is locked such that the through-shaft does not rotate, even under high wind conditions.
The control system also comprises: first and second hydraulic pressure lines operationally connected to the actuator through first and second ports; and a bi-directional motor and pump connected to the first and second hydraulic pressure lines.
The control system also comprises means for relieving pressure in the system, including in the rotational actuator itself, under high temperature conditions. The term “high temperature conditions” as used herein means temperatures at which the pressure in the actuator rises to a selected pressure, typically set to be a pressure (e.g., 6000 psi) at which there is a risk of causing damage to the actuator if that high pressure is held for a lengthy time period (e.g. several hours), which will trigger pressure relief in the system, as more particularly described below. The pressure-relief system is triggered when the actuator is not rotating, and when pressure in the actuator and hydraulic lines can build up because of the effect of ambient temperature on the actuator and hydraulic components when the fluid is not circulating.
Advantageously, the means for relieving pressure in the system during high temperature conditions comprise: a pressure relief line operationally connected to the actuator; first and second pressure sensors respectively operationally connected to a first and second hydraulic pressure line, the second pressure sensor also advantageously being operationally connected to the pressure relief line; the first and second pressure sensors being capable respectively of sending first and second pressure signals; a computer processor capable of receiving the first and second pressure signals from the first and second pressure sensors, and capable of sending a solenoid valve control signal in response to the received pressure signals; and a solenoid valve in operational connection to the pressure relief line capable of receiving the solenoid valve control signal from the processor; such that the control signal from the processor opens or closes the solenoid valve. In an embodiment, the pressure relief line is operationally connected to the actuator through the second hydraulic line.
Under high ambient temperatures, the processor is programmed to send a solenoid valve control signal causing the solenoid valve to open when it receives a pressure signal indicating pressures at or above a first selected value, e.g., 6000 psi, from both of said pressure sensors. The process is also programmed to send a signal to said solenoid valve causing it to close when it receives pressure signals from said pressure sensors indicating pressures at or below a second selected value, e.g., about 3500 psi to about 4500 psi. The first selected pressure, which triggers opening of the solenoid value to send hydraulic fluid to a hydraulic fluid reservoir, thereby relieving the pressure and preventing over-pressure damage to the system, is, in an embodiment, about 6000 psi. Other such triggering pressures can be selected depending on the strength and materials of system components.
The second selected pressure, which triggers closing of the valve, is selected to be low enough such that there will be a large enough gap between the first and second selected pressures such that the valve will not open and close numerous times per day. It is desirable that the valve not be triggered to open and close more than about three or four times a day. In an embodiment, the second selected pressure value is between about 3500 and 4500 psi.
In operating the system in areas where high winds are likely to occur, the collector will typically be rotated into stow position, either automatically or by an operator, when high winds of about 30 to about 45 mph occur. Anemometers can be used to detect wind velocity and automatically initiate rotation of the collector into stow position, for example, as described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/029,466, filed Feb. 18, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference to the extent not inconsistent herewith for purposes of enablement and written description.
The automatic means provided herein for locking the actuator in stow position under high wind conditions up to about 30-45 mph and in embodiments, up to 80 mph or more, comprise: first and second check valves on first and second hydraulic lines, respectively; a first pilot line connected to the second hydraulic line, which is operationally connected to the first check valve; and a second pilot line connected to the first hydraulic line, which is operationally connected to the second check valve; such that back-pressure in one of the hydraulic lines caused by wind pressure rotating the actuator to push hydraulic fluid into the hydraulic line closes the check valve on that hydraulic line and prevents further flow of hydraulic fluid in the system, resulting in prevention of further movement of the actuator, thereby preventing movement of the solar collector out of stow position. Under high winds, back-pressure will occur in only one of the hydraulic lines. If the pressure sensors and computer processor are activated, only one pressure sensor would sense high pressure, and thus pressure relief would not be triggered. However, there is no need for the control system components to be turned on (using external power), because the hydraulic system automatically locks the actuator and prevents movement of the solar collector out of stow position by means of the hydraulic lines and check valves. “Automatic” in this context means without the need for operator intervention or external power (other than the force of the wind).
The actuator system provided herein also comprises at least one solar collector operationally connected to the actuator. The system can also include multiple collectors operationally connected to a single actuator. The term “multiple collectors” means two to about sixteen, and any number of collectors between two and sixteen.
Also provided herein is a method of making a rotational actuator system for controlling rotation of a solar collector. This method comprises: providing a bi-directional hydraulic rotational actuator capable of exerting enough torque to rotate at least one solar collector; providing a control system for controlling operation of the actuator; the control system comprising automatic means for causing the actuator to remain locked during high-wind conditions; and hydraulically connecting the control system to the actuator. The method also comprising hydraulically connecting to the actuator automatic means for allowing the actuator to relieve high pressures (to prevent damage to the actuator, its internal seals, etc.) caused by high temperature conditions. In this context, “automatic” means without operator intervention, but external power can be supplied to run the necessary components such as the computer processor and sensors.
Also provided herein is a method of preventing rotation of one or more solar collector(s) from the stow position. The method comprises: providing a bi-directional hydraulic rotational actuator capable of exerting sufficient torque to rotate the collector(s) to track the sun; operably connecting this actuator to a control system comprising check valves and hydraulic lines; whereby the control system is configured to prevent backflow of hydraulic fluid from the actuator caused by high winds; wherein the check valves automatically prevent backflow of hydraulic fluid from circulating in one of said hydraulic lines, thereby preventing rotation of the actuator.
In addition to the exemplary aspects and embodiments described above, further aspects and embodiments will become apparent by reference to the drawings and by study of the following descriptions.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced figures of the drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than limiting.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, not limiting in scope. In various embodiments, one or more of the above-described problems have been reduced or eliminated, while other embodiments are directed to other improvements.
Provided herein is a rotational drive system useful for in enabling large parabolic trough solar collectors to precisely track the sun's movement across the sky during normal sunny days. It is also designed to resist the very high rotational loads on large solar collectors when extremely high wind loads occur. Wind speeds of about 85 mph currently occur only once every 25 years, on average, in most U.S. locations, but these rare events produce extremely high rotational loads that are imparted to the rotational drive units of large parabolic trough solar collectors, which must be strong enough to resist these high loads without rotating (i.e., the rotational actuator must stay substantially locked in place, to keep the collectors from moving into a more wind-susceptible rotational position). But in addition to being sufficiently strong and staying locked in place during high winds, this drive system also allows for automatic pressure relief of the actuator when internal pressure of the hydraulic fluid is too high due to thermal expansion of the hydraulic fluid (which can occur just because of a rise in outdoor ambient temperature). The drive system locks in place when high internal pressure is caused by high winds, but relieves pressure when high internal pressure is caused by an increase in outdoor ambient temperature. The system components must be strong enough to resist breaking under the high pressures referred to herein.
The rotary actuator 1 shown in
Operation of rotary actuator 1 is described as follows. To produce rotation of through-shaft 10, pressurized fluid entering second port 30 pushes on piston 20, causing it to rotate clockwise (when viewed facing the first end 35) against the fourth set of helical teeth 65 on the inside housing 15. The second set of helical teeth 47 on the inside of the rotating piston 20 engage with the first set of teeth 45 on the central through-shaft 10 causing central through-shaft 10 to rotate clockwise. Pressuring the first port 25 will return the piston and the shaft to their initial positions. Additional internal seals (not shown) can be present where required to prevent the hydraulic fluid from leaking and ensure development of the required high pressures.
Because the helical teeth remain engaged at all times, loads are distributed over a large amount of gear tooth area. This characteristic provides for a high overload capacity—and hence the actuator unit is capable of resisting the very high back-driving torques that are created during high winds of 80 mph or more without moving or breaking. While most gearing systems have very small gear tooth contact areas, this helical gearing system provides a large amount of contact area, a characteristic that benefits the merging of the helical gearing system with the rotation of a large parabolic trough solar collector.
As shown below, the helical rotary actuator 1 can be configured to provide locking of the actuator against high loads such as those developed when very high winds occur, which impart large back-driving loads to actuator 1, yet to allow for pressure relief of the actuator when thermal expansion of the hydraulic fluid in the actuator causes too high a pressure.
First and second hydraulic lines 64 and 66 are connected respectively to first and second ports 25 and 30 of actuator 1. First pressure sensor 72 on one side of actuator 1 is operationally connected to first hydraulic line 64 and generates first pressure signal 80. Second pressure sensor 74 on the other side of actuator 1 is operationally connected to second hydraulic line 66 and generates second pressure signal 82. Arrows 12 indicate the direction of rotation of actuator through-shaft 10, depending on whether hydraulic fluid enters actuator 1 through first port 25 through first hydraulic pressure line 64 or through second port 30 through second hydraulic pressure line 66. Second pressure sensor 74 is operationally connected to solenoid valve 76 on hydraulic pressure relief line 90, which is operationally connected to optional pressure relief valve 78. The arrow at the right side of
In operation, bi-directional motor 58 operates pump 60 to send pressurized hydraulic fluid through first hydraulic line 64 or second hydraulic line 66 to actuator 1, where the hydraulic fluid causes either clockwise (CW) or counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the through-shaft 10 of actuator 1. Neither first check valve 68 nor second check valve 69 can open when motor 58 and pump 60 are not running. When pump 60 is not running, actuator 1 is kept locked in place because hydraulic fluid is prevented from passing through either first check valve 68 or second check valve 69.
When pump 60 sends pressurized fluid through second hydraulic line 66, the fluid can flow through second check valve 69 and up to actuator 1 into second port 30. To complete the fluid circuit, fluid must exit first port 25 and flow through first pilot check valve 68 and then return through first hydraulic pressure line 64 to the pump 60. First check valve 68 would normally stop hydraulic fluid flow that comes out of actuator 1 into first hydraulic line 64, and prevent it from returning to pump 60, which would interrupt the flow circuit (from second hydraulic line 66 through actuator 1 to first hydraulic line 64 to pump 60 and again into second hydraulic line 66), and prevent actuator 1 from rotating. However, check valves 68 and 69 are pilot line-operated, so when the pressure in second hydraulic line 66 from pump 60 provides pressure on first pilot line 84 and disables (opens) first check valve 68, this allows the circuit to be completed, allowing back flow from first port 25 through first pilot check valve 68 to first hydraulic pressure line 64 so that actuator 1 can keep rotating.
Similarly, when pump 60 sends pressurized fluid through first hydraulic line 64, the fluid can flow through first check valve 68 and up to actuator 1. Second check valve 69 would normally stop hydraulic fluid flow that comes out of actuator 1 into second hydraulic line 66, and prevent it from returning to pump 60, which would interrupt the flow circuit (this time, from first hydraulic line 64 through actuator 1 to second hydraulic line 66 to pump 60 and again into first hydraulic line 64), and prevent actuator 1 from rotating. However, as when the flow was in the opposite direction as described above, when the hydraulic fluid in first hydraulic line 64 from pump 60 provides pressure on second pilot line 86 and disables second check valve 69, this allows the circuit to be completed so that actuator 1 can rotate.
As pointed out above, when pump 60 is not running, there will be no pressure on either first pilot line 84 or second pilot line 86, and the flow circuit will not be complete. Thus the check valves will prevent backflow from actuator 1 to pump 60. This means that when pump 60 is not running, actuator 1 is locked in place. This condition is desirable under high wind conditions when the solar collectors are not tracking the sun's movement and should remain locked in place.
High winds will back-drive the rotary actuator one way or the other, depending, among other things, on the direction of the wind and any upstream obstacles that affect the wind flow. Back-flow of hydraulic fluid will not occur simultaneously out of ports 25 and 30. This allows us to configure the hydraulic system to enable locking of the actuator when high winds create high internal pressures in the actuator.
For example, if a wind is blowing that would tend to twist a parabolic trough collector that is being controlled by the through-shaft 10 of actuator 1 rotating in a CCW direction, and the wind speed becomes dangerously high (e.g., 80 mph), the wind pressures exerted upon the solar collectors creates a large rotational force that must be resisted by the actuator 1. The large overturning moment in the counterclockwise direction on the collector, which is in stow position, causes high pressure to develop within actuator 1 as the hydraulic fluid in actuator 1 is compressed by wind-induced torque. For example, under these high wind conditions, a pressure of about 6000 psi might result within actuator 1 on one side of actuator piston 20 (see
However, there are circumstances when it is desirable for actuator 1 to relieve high internal fluid pressures. For example high outdoor ambient temperatures can cause expansion of the hydraulic fluid and create high internal pressure within actuator 1. If the pressure gets too high, e.g., greater than about 7000 psi, generally caused by temperature increases during lengthy periods when the fluid is locked in the actuator 1, such as overnight or during daytime periods when the actuator is not operating (for example if the unit is out of service), the high pressure can damage actuator 1, for example by damaging internal pressure seals or even cracking the actuator housing 15 (
Only when the pressures detected by both first and second pressure sensors 72 and 74 are at or above the threshold pressure will solenoid valve signal 88 be sent to solenoid valve 76 providing for relief of the pressure in actuator 1. In the event of a significant outdoor temperature rise, causing expansion of the hydraulic fluid and thereby creating high internal pressures in actuator 1, the internal pressures will increase on both sides of piston 20 (
The processor is also programmed to close solenoid valve 76 when the pressure has fallen to a pressure well below the level that would cause damage to actuator 1.
Optional pressure relief valve 78 is a safety feature. It guards against accidental or erroneous pressure relief due to accidental or erroneous transmission of a solenoid valve signal 88 to solenoid valve 76. For example, sometimes when electronic equipment is first powered up, it will send short-burst signals. Should this occur and a short, erroneous solenoid valve signal 88 be sent to solenoid valve 76, it is not desirable to have the hydraulic fluid be sent to the hydraulic fluid reservoir. Pressure relief valve 78 guards against this because it opens only when it directly detects high pressure, e.g., 4500 psi or higher. When solenoid valve signal 88 is legitimate, i.e., due to very high pressures detected by both first and second pressure sensors 72 and 74, solenoid valve 76 will open and pressure relief valve 78 will also open when it experiences high fluid pressure coming through solenoid valve 76. But if an erroneous solenoid valve signal 88 opens solenoid valve 76, when the pressure is low, e.g., below about 3500 psi, pressure relief valve 78 will not open and the hydraulic fluid will not be directed to the reservoir.
Thus a system and method of relieving high pressures due to thermal expansion of the hydraulic fluid has been provided, while also ensuring that pressure relief does not occur when high winds are the cause of high internal actuator pressure.
In operation, rotary actuator 1 is operated via the hydraulic control system as described above with respect to
While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations thereof. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims and claims hereafter introduced are interpreted to include all such modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations as are within their true spirit and scope.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/091,254 filed Aug. 22, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference to the extent not inconsistent herewith.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
670916 | Eneas | Mar 1901 | A |
670917 | Eneas | Mar 1901 | A |
1092503 | Moore | Apr 1914 | A |
1760883 | Moss | Jun 1930 | A |
1792489 | Gilmore | Feb 1931 | A |
2657533 | Schanzlin et al. | Nov 1953 | A |
2955955 | Orr | Oct 1960 | A |
3070923 | Fellman | Jan 1963 | A |
3187592 | Geyer | Jun 1965 | A |
3459234 | Richter et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3463527 | Baker | Aug 1969 | A |
3511134 | Wittren | May 1970 | A |
3548866 | Kaiser et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3559534 | Munro | Feb 1971 | A |
3564783 | Dunne | Feb 1971 | A |
3668754 | Boast | Jun 1972 | A |
3775226 | Windorf | Nov 1973 | A |
3861379 | Anderson | Jan 1975 | A |
3872854 | Raser | Mar 1975 | A |
3946532 | Gilb | Mar 1976 | A |
4031444 | Back, Jr. | Jun 1977 | A |
4031879 | Parham | Jun 1977 | A |
4069635 | Gilb | Jan 1978 | A |
4069812 | O'Neill | Jan 1978 | A |
4077176 | Bauer | Mar 1978 | A |
4078549 | McKeen et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4119365 | Powell | Oct 1978 | A |
4126993 | Grattapaglia et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4127926 | White | Dec 1978 | A |
4141626 | Treytl et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4146785 | Neale | Mar 1979 | A |
4158356 | Wininger | Jun 1979 | A |
4159710 | Prast | Jul 1979 | A |
4161905 | Ota | Jul 1979 | A |
4178913 | Hutchison | Dec 1979 | A |
4191164 | Kelly | Mar 1980 | A |
4195620 | Rust | Apr 1980 | A |
4211922 | Vaerewyck et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4215410 | Weslow et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4226910 | Dahlen et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4230763 | Skolnick | Oct 1980 | A |
4237864 | Kravitz | Dec 1980 | A |
4269173 | Krueger et al. | May 1981 | A |
4293192 | Bronstein | Oct 1981 | A |
4307150 | Roche | Dec 1981 | A |
4313367 | Weyer | Feb 1982 | A |
4313422 | McEntee | Feb 1982 | A |
4318394 | Alexander | Mar 1982 | A |
4328789 | Nelson | May 1982 | A |
4343533 | Currin et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4352511 | Ribble et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4354484 | Malone et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4363354 | Strickland | Dec 1982 | A |
4368962 | Hultberg | Jan 1983 | A |
4372027 | Hutchison | Feb 1983 | A |
4373514 | Lois | Feb 1983 | A |
4398802 | Auger et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4414254 | Iwata et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4423719 | Hutchison | Jan 1984 | A |
4425904 | Butler | Jan 1984 | A |
4440150 | Kaehler | Apr 1984 | A |
4446262 | Okumura et al. | May 1984 | A |
4465057 | Nikkel et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4487196 | Murphy | Dec 1984 | A |
4493872 | Funderburk et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4500970 | Daemmer | Feb 1985 | A |
4510923 | Bronstein | Apr 1985 | A |
4523575 | Nikkel et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4536847 | Erickson et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4571812 | Gee | Feb 1986 | A |
4577449 | Celli | Mar 1986 | A |
4587951 | Townsend et al. | May 1986 | A |
4596238 | Bronstein | Jun 1986 | A |
4597377 | Melamed | Jul 1986 | A |
4604990 | Nikkel et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4608964 | Russo | Sep 1986 | A |
4611575 | Powell | Sep 1986 | A |
4628692 | Pierce | Dec 1986 | A |
4645714 | Roche et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4666263 | Petcavich | May 1987 | A |
4678292 | Miyatani et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4710426 | Stephens | Dec 1987 | A |
4719903 | Powell | Jan 1988 | A |
4739620 | Pierce | Apr 1988 | A |
4832001 | Baer | May 1989 | A |
4853283 | Skolnick | Aug 1989 | A |
4888063 | Powell | Dec 1989 | A |
4893183 | Nayar | Jan 1990 | A |
4913468 | Rattmann | Apr 1990 | A |
4933823 | Taylor | Jun 1990 | A |
5006988 | Borenstein et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5013176 | Orbom | May 1991 | A |
5018935 | Gage | May 1991 | A |
5049005 | Lazare et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5058565 | Gee et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5063112 | Gross et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5069964 | Tolliver et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5071243 | Bronstein | Dec 1991 | A |
5118540 | Hutchison | Jun 1992 | A |
5136593 | Moon et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5138838 | Crosser | Aug 1992 | A |
5205101 | Swan et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5219264 | McClure et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5228259 | Haddad et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5237337 | Hutchison et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251064 | Tennant et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5276600 | Takase et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5285627 | Losel et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5334844 | Pollard et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347986 | Cordy | Sep 1994 | A |
5350201 | Bynum | Sep 1994 | A |
5361172 | Schissel et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367174 | Bazile et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5398462 | Berlin et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404868 | Sankrithi | Apr 1995 | A |
5444972 | Moore | Aug 1995 | A |
5446356 | Kim | Aug 1995 | A |
5448868 | Lalvani | Sep 1995 | A |
5531216 | Nicklas et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542409 | Sampayo | Aug 1996 | A |
5673684 | Myles, III et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681642 | Sugisaki et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5706798 | Steinorth | Jan 1998 | A |
5787877 | Nicklas et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793934 | Bauer | Aug 1998 | A |
5804942 | Jeong | Sep 1998 | A |
5806553 | Sidwell | Sep 1998 | A |
5819008 | Asama et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820168 | De Giacomoni | Oct 1998 | A |
5846659 | Lower et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851309 | Kousa | Dec 1998 | A |
5857322 | Cohn | Jan 1999 | A |
5896488 | Jeong | Apr 1999 | A |
5899199 | Mills | May 1999 | A |
5929530 | Stone | Jul 1999 | A |
5938364 | Hayden | Aug 1999 | A |
5956917 | Reynolds | Sep 1999 | A |
5964216 | Hoffschmidt et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982481 | Stone et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000211 | Bellac et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6041274 | Onishi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6056240 | Hagenlocher | May 2000 | A |
6065267 | Fisher | May 2000 | A |
6111638 | Chou et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123067 | Warrick | Sep 2000 | A |
6131565 | Mills | Oct 2000 | A |
6169414 | Yoshino et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6205739 | Newlin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234166 | Katsir et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237337 | Bronicki et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6250693 | Gensert et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6279312 | Hennecke | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292752 | Franke et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6317229 | Otterson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321539 | Bronicki et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349521 | McKeon et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359212 | Hall et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6409228 | Fadini et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433867 | Esquivel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6469466 | Suzuki | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470271 | Matsunaga | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6484506 | Bellac et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6625983 | Kawasaki | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6639421 | Yoshino et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6662801 | Hayden et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6680693 | Urban et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6688303 | Davenport et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694738 | Bronicki et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6740381 | Day et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6772062 | Lasky et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6772671 | Asano et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792759 | Rollins, III | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6827911 | Gering | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6837010 | Powell et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848796 | Tagirov | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6892502 | Hubbell et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6989924 | Jorgensen et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7055519 | Litwin et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065927 | Powell et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7104064 | Hon | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7155309 | Peless et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163241 | Liu et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7228230 | Hirokawa | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7281381 | Johnson | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291056 | Ohishi et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7349759 | Peless et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7393577 | Day et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7530201 | Reynolds et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7578109 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587862 | Reynolds et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7612937 | Jorgensen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7849687 | Heusser et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7883288 | Jorna | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20030163966 | Reynolds et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040074180 | Barmakian et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040074202 | Barmakian et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040128940 | LaForge | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168383 | Reynolds et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040244376 | Litwin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050034437 | McMurtry et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050836 | Barmakian | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050252153 | Barmakian et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060048800 | Rast et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053726 | Reynolds et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060174622 | Skowronski | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060181765 | Jorgensen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060225729 | Litwin | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229773 | Peretz | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060260314 | Kincaid et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277843 | Livingston et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011983 | Reynolds et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080046130 | Faivre et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080050579 | Kirkman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072516 | Reynolds et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080127595 | Reynolds et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080127647 | Leitner | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168981 | Cummings et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080204352 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080226846 | Hill | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247069 | Bronstein | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080283113 | Conger | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000613 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090095283 | Curtis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101195 | Reynolds et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090188488 | Kraft et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090205637 | Moore et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090260753 | Selig et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100000570 | Mertins et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100005752 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100032016 | Gee et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071683 | Selig et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100199972 | Brost | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0321919 | Apr 2006 | AT |
0448369 | Nov 2009 | AT |
4995099 | Jan 2001 | AU |
7300713 | Apr 2008 | AU |
8311746 | Apr 2009 | AU |
721243 | Nov 1965 | CA |
2664192 | Apr 2008 | CA |
1376228 | Oct 2002 | CN |
1170993 | Oct 2004 | CN |
101529027 | Sep 2009 | CN |
43 17 279 | Dec 1994 | DE |
203 14 172 | Dec 2003 | DE |
69930635 | Dec 2006 | DE |
602007003164 | Dec 2009 | DE |
0 314 199 | Sep 1991 | EP |
1 801 517 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1 764 565 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1 200 683 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1 754 942 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1 903 155 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2 123 834 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2 128 352 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2 154 301 | Feb 2010 | EP |
0197541 | Dec 2009 | IL |
58150831 | Sep 1983 | JP |
59012952 | Jan 1984 | JP |
59072401 | Apr 1984 | JP |
62011744 | Jan 1987 | JP |
2262037 | Oct 1990 | JP |
4333254 | Nov 1992 | JP |
06003194 | Jan 1994 | JP |
11182026 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001077384 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002063807 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2003194419 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003229009 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2009003087 | May 2009 | MX |
WO 8002604 | Nov 1980 | WO |
WO 9633787 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 0007818 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0104430 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 02082037 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2004099682 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005003645 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005003646 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005003647 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005078360 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005108959 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2008058528 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008039233 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2009052220 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009052520 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009105291 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2010006056 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010006193 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010022280 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010083292 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Automation Direct (downloaded Aug. 23, 2010) “GS2 Series Specifications” Drives/Motors/Motion vol. 13, e13-22 http://www.automationdirect.com/adc/Shopping/Catalog/Drives/GS2—(115—-z-—230—-z-—460—-z-—575—VAC—V-z-Hz—Control)/GS2—Drive—Units—(115—-z-—230—-z-—460—-z-—575—VAC)/GS2-11P0. |
Baccaro, S., et al. (2003), “Quality control facilities for large optical reflectors at ENEA-Casaccia for physics application,” Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.) 125:272-276. |
Dersch et al. (2004) “Trough Integration into Power Plants—A Study on the Performance and Economy of Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems,” Energy 29:947-959. |
Eckart [Hydraulik•Pneumatik] (downloaded Aug. 23, 2010) “Produkte mit starkem Profil” http://www.eckart-gmbh.de/. |
El-Sayed, M. (2005) “Solar Supported Steam Production for Power Generation in Egypt,” Energy Policy 33:1251-1259. |
El-Wakil, M.M. (1984) “Combined Cycles: General,” In; Powerplant Technology, New York: McGraw-Hill Hardcover, pp. 341-351. |
Feuermann, D., et al. (2002), “Solar Fiber-Optic Mini-Dish Concentrators: First Experimental Results and Field Experience,” Solar Energy 72(6):459-472. |
Flagsol (2006) “ISCCS—Integrated Solar Combined Cycle System,” http://www.flagsol.com/ISCCS—tech.htm, Downloaded Sep. 9, 2006. |
Horn et al. (2004) “Economic Analysis of Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants; A Sample Case: The Economic Feasibility of an ISCCS Power Plant in Egypt,” Energy 29:935-945. |
Hosseini et al. (2005) “Technical and Economic Assessment of the Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants in Iran,” Renewable Energy 30:1541-1555. |
Kaminski, J. et al. (2006), “Full-Field Shape Measurement of Specular Surfaces,” in Fringe, 2005, The 5th International Workshop on Automatic Processing of Fringe Patterns, pp. 372-379. |
Kelly et al. (2001) “Optimization Studies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems,” Proceedings of Solar Forum 2001, Solar Energy: The Power to Choose, Apr. 21-25, Washington, DC. |
Lietner et al. (2002) “Brighter than a Hundred Suns,” U.S. Department of Energy/NREL publication, p. 10 of 144-06P spec. |
Mulholland, G.W. and Germer, T.A. (2003), “Modeling, Measurement and Standards for Wafer Inspection,” Proc. Government Microcircuits Applications and Critical Technologies Conference, “Countering Asymmetric Threats,” Tampa, FL, published on ScatterWorks, In. website. |
“National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA Rough: Near-Term Component/Subsystem Development, Task I-B-1: Space Frame Design, Draft Detailed Report” (Aug. 25, 2005), prepared by Gossamer Space Frames. |
Novatec BioSol AG Presentation Nov. 7, 2007. http://www.menarec.org/resources/NOVATEC-BioSol—20071107.pdf. |
Novatec BioSol AG Presentation Nov. 26, 2007. Hotel Intercontinental Germany-Frankfurt. http://www.rural-electrification.com/cms/upload/pdf/Presentations—Jordanian—Delegation—Visit/07—NOVATEC-BioSol—20071126.pdf. |
Product Literature for Portable Specular Reflectometer Model 15R, Devices and Services Company, http://devicesandservices.com/prod02.htm, last modified May 25, 2007. |
“Truss Connection,” YouTube, Jul. 4, 2007 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtoQJONKRm0. |
Ulmer, S et al. (2006), “Slope Measurements of Parabolic Dish Concentrators Using Color-coded Targets,” SolarPACES2006 A7-S5:1-8. |
(Dec. 19, 2007) “Aquaflector.” http://www.aquaflector.com/index.html. |
(Dec. 19, 2007) “Aquaflector.” http://www.aquaflector.com/rationale.html. |
(Dec. 19, 2007) “Aquaflector.” http://www.aquaflector.com/technology.html. |
(Dec. 19, 2007) “Aquaflector.” http://www.aquaflector.com/contact.html. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/079,382, filed Jul. 9, 2008, Farr et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/029,466, filed Feb. 18, 2009, Gee et al. |
Helac Corporation (Apr. 2007) “Helical, Hydraulic Rotary Actuators, T20 Series,” Product Manual. |
Helac Corporation, (2003) “Helical, Hydraulic Rotary Actuators, L20 Series,” Product Manual. |
Helac Corporation (2004) “Helical, Hydraulic Rotary Actuators, L30 Series,” Product Manual. |
Helac Corporation (Jun. 2001) “Sprayer Steers Clear of the Ordinary,” Hydraulics and Pneumatics http://www.hydraulicspneumatics.com. |
(Mar. 20, 2008) “Precision Actuator Puts New Spin on Solar Power,” Machine Design 24: http://machinedesign.com/article/precision-actuator-puts-new-spin-on-solar-power-0320. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100043776 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61091254 | Aug 2008 | US |