Not applicable.
Hydraulic load-handling clamp assemblies, of the type normally mountable on lift trucks and other industrial vehicles for manipulating and transporting loads, often have a pair of transversely openable and closable clamp arms powered by one or more linear or rotary hydraulic actuators for selectively gripping and releasing loads. Such hydraulic clamp assemblies also commonly have a selectable hydraulic side-shifting capability which can move the clamp arms transversely in unison in either of two opposite directions while clamping a load. In some of such clamp assemblies, the same hydraulic actuator(s) which perform the load-clamping function also selectively perform the side-shifting function, thereby advantageously minimizing the size and weight of the assembly. Such systems are referred to herein as “integral” load clamping and side-shifting units. Conversely, in “non-integral” systems, the clamp assembly's load-clamping hydraulic actuator(s) are movably carried by a separate side-shifting assembly having its own separate side-shifting hydraulic actuator(s).
A longstanding problem has existed with respect to both the foregoing integral and non-integral types of units, in that the above-described load-clamping function requires load clamping forces applied by both clamp arms to the load in respective opposite directions, while at the same time the side-shifting function requires side-shifting forces applied by both clamp arms in the same direction. The result is that the bidirectional clamping force is automatically diminished by the simultaneous unidirectional side-shifting force, thereby enabling a clamped load to slip and fall from the clamp during side-shifting if the side-shifting force is too great relative to the clamping force. The most problematic situation of this type occurs when limited hydraulic clamping force is already being applied to grip a fragile load to avoid overclamping damage to the load, at the same time that the hydraulic side-shifting force is not being sufficiently limited due to the damp operator's desire for rapid side-shifting.
The foregoing summary will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Integral Embodiments
The hydraulic arrangement shown in
Conversely, upon movement of valve 20 to the left in
As also exemplified in the integral arrangement of
Conversely, upon activation of valve 44 to the left in the figure, pressurized hydraulic fluid is similarly introduced from pump 22 and line 27 through valve passageway 54 of valve 44, right side-shifting line 50 and line 38, thereby imposing rightward pressure on the piston 28. Whether or not the clamp arms 10, 12 are currently clamping a load, the rightward pressure on piston 28 can nevertheless cause clamping fluid in line 18 to be transferred to the corresponding opposite line 16 of the other clamping cylinder, thereby causing corresponding rightward pressure on piston 26 and the exhaustion of fluid from line 36 through line 48 and valve passageway 55 to the hydraulic reservoir 29, so that the pistons 26 and 28 side-shift in unison to the right. No leakage of the fluid is permitted through clamping line 14 during right side-shifting because pilot-operated check valve 40 preserves the clamping pressure as mentioned above.
In
The longstanding problem referred to in the foregoing Background of the Invention is solved herein by load-weight responsive side-shifting systems exemplified by a side-shifting force control circuit 68 shown in the various
Thus with a lower-weight load, where the clamping pressure can likewise be safely lower, the side-shifting pressure in either of lines 48 or 50 is variably limited by the automatically variable relief setting of the valve 70 in response to the variable weight of the load, as sensed through lines 66 and 72. This solves the problem, described previously in the Background of the Invention, whereby, when reduced hydraulic clamping pressure is needed for a lighter or more fragile load, but the hydraulic side-shifting pressure is not automatically limited by a side-shifting pressure-relief circuit such as 68, the resultant high side-shifting pressure could harmfully cause a reduction in clamping force by opposing the clamping force, thereby possibly causing an elevated clamped load to slip or fall from the clamp during side-shifting.
It should be recognized that the foregoing solution is intended to interfere only with the unintended consequences of the clamp's side-shifting circuit, and is purposely prevented from interfering with the clamping function of the load clamping circuit as controlled by clamp valve 20. This separation of functions is accomplished by the pilot-operated check valve 40 in the load clamping circuit which isolates the clamping pistons 26 and 28 from any decrease in clamping pressure other than as dictated by the load clamping valve 20 to unseat the check valve 40 by applying pressure through line 32.
Non-Integral Embodiments
The terms and expressions which have been employed in the foregoing specification are used therein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims which follow. In particular, all of the foregoing embodiments are shown as being hydraulic in nature because of the predominant use of hydraulic actuators in load-handling applications. However, equivalent electrical actuators, and/or electrical control systems, could alternatively be used in such load-handling applications to perform similar functions to those described herein, as would be recognized by those skilled in the art. Accordingly, such equivalent electrical actuators and control systems are intended to be covered by the claims which follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2663443 | Schenkelberger | Dec 1953 | A |
2795346 | Farmer | Jun 1957 | A |
3692198 | Lake | Sep 1972 | A |
3865424 | Jabkowski | Feb 1975 | A |
3971584 | Duncan | Jul 1976 | A |
3990594 | Olson | Nov 1976 | A |
4335992 | Reeves | Jun 1982 | A |
4431365 | Sturtz, Jr. | Feb 1984 | A |
4682931 | House | Jul 1987 | A |
5984617 | Seaberg | Nov 1999 | A |
6390751 | Jordan | May 2002 | B2 |
6431816 | Jordan | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7056078 | Seaberg | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7553120 | Veneziani | Jun 2009 | B2 |
8091467 | Petronek | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8979154 | Petronek | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9221658 | Matti | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20020131852 | Jordan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030017040 | Jordan | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20060073001 | Chase | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080063503 | Garrett | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090304479 | Lessard | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100089704 | Petronek | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100300812 | Hall | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120210802 | Sarh | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140365009 | Wettels | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150368080 | Dal Dosso | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160122167 | White | May 2016 | A1 |
20160243709 | Ganz | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
United States Patent and Trademark Office; International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/069365 dated Mar. 23, 2017; 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180079634 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |