HYDRAULIC CONTROL SYSTEM FOR LINEAR ACTUATION

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20230213031
  • Publication Number
    20230213031
  • Date Filed
    June 09, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Published
    July 06, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A hydraulic control system for linear actuation that includes an electric motor connected to a hydraulic pump and a hydraulic cylinder connected to the pump by a first flow line. A pressure transducer, a pressure control valve, and a check valve are connected to the first flow line between the pump and the cylinder and a tank is connected to the pump by a second flow line and the cylinder by a return line. A control valve is connected between the first flow line and the return line.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Controlling linear actuation of a hydraulic device is known in the art. For example, with respect to a scissor lift, as shown in FIG. 2, an on/off valve N is used to control the lowering function of the scissor lift. The hydraulic cylinder 9 retracts once the on/off valve moves to a position to the right. The lowering function is load dependent and cannot be adjusted. Thus, if there is more weight on the platform, the scissor lift will drop faster, and if there is less weight, the scissor lift will drop slower. Further, the control of the lowering function is not smooth.


The scissor lift market has been moving toward electrification and their existing suppliers in the market for electric drive motors. However, there exists no good solution for electrifying lift systems. While the present invention is discussed in the context of a scissor lift system, the invention is applied to any compact hydraulic powered by an electric motor that is applied anywhere linear actuation is needed, especially for hydraulic cylinders with duty cycle matching design specifications.


The speed of the lowering function of the cylinder is governed by the orifice equation as described in Eq. 1 and 2.









Q
=

k
·

A
orifice

·


Δ

P







Equation



(
1
)













V
=

Q

A
cap






Equation



(
2
)








Where:

    • Q is the flow rate through the orifice (labeled as O in FIG. 2)
    • k is the orifice constant
    • Aorifice is the opening area in the orifice (labeled as O in FIG. 2)
    • ΔP is the pressure differential across the orifice (labeled as O in FIG. 2)
    • V is the velocity of cylinder retraction (which is not the same as platform speed)
    • Acap is the area of the cap side of the cylinder


According to the equations above, in order to control the retraction speed of the cylinder (flow rate), independent of the load weight (pressure differential), the orifice area needs to be controlled and adjusted based on the load weight. If speed control is needed, the orifice area can also be further adjusted. In order to achieve a smooth control operation, proportional speed control and load dependent control are essential.


As electrification of powertrains becomes more common, machine OEMs are redesigning their system architectures to be more optimal. In the case of aerial work platforms like scissor lifts, this means using a dedicated power pack hydraulic system for the platform lifting function. Such power packs usually vary the speed of a fixed-displacement pump (like a gear pump) in order to directly vary the speed of an actuator (like a hydraulic cylinder). Most external gear pumps have an operating envelope that defines, especially, the minimum allowed speed as a function of pump output pressure. Operating outside of this envelope can reduce the operating life and performance of a pump. However, avoiding these low speeds outside of the allowed envelope means that low flow rates and, consequently, low cylinder actuation rates cannot be achieved directly.


To solve this problem one could simply ignore the gear pump operating envelope, but this would potentially reduce pump life and performance. One could also prevent the system from operation at low speeds, but this would reduce machine controllability. Also, one could throttle all lifting flow directly with a dedicated proportional valve, but this generally is less efficient and requires additional dedicated hardware to be installed into the system. Finally, one could use a variable-displacement pump, potentially with zero-displacement capability, but this is far too expensive for a scissor lift power pack.


Accordingly, in many applications, including scissor lifts, it is desired to have a fully proportional speed control from zero to maximum speed to maintain safety, comfort, and overall controllability in all working conditions and avoiding damage to the work environment.


An objective of the present invention is to provide a hydraulic control system that more precisely controls linear actuation.


Another objective of the present invention is to provide a hydraulic control system that controls linear actuation from zero to maximum speed safely and comfortably and avoids damage in the work environment.


These and other objective will be apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art based upon the following written description, drawings, and claims


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A hydraulic control system for linear actuation includes an electric motor connected to a hydraulic pump and a hydraulic cylinder connected to the pump by a first flow line. A pressure transducer, a pressure control valve, and a check valve are connected to the first flow line between the pump and the cylinder. A tank is connected to the pump by a second flow line and the cylinder by a control line. A control valve is connected between the first flow line and the return line and is connected to the first flow line between the check valve and the pump.


A proportional control valve is connected between the first flow line and the return line and is connected to the first flow line between the check valve and the pressure control valve. The proportional control valve is also connected to a processor and an operator command. An opening area of the proportional control valve is controlled by the processor. The processor controls the proportional control valve based upon a pressure measurement and the pressure measurement is determined from a command signal from the operator command and a signal from the pressure transducer.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a lift system; and



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a hydraulic control system for linear actuation of a lift system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

With reference to the figures, a hydraulic control system for linear actuation 10 includes an electric motor 12 connected to a hydraulic pump 14. The pump 14 is connected to a hydraulic cylinder 16 by flow line 18. Connected between the pump 14 and cylinder 16 on the flow line 18 is a pressure transducer 20, a pressure control valve 22, and a check valve 24. The pump 14 is also connected to a tank 26 via flow line 28.


The cylinder 16 is connected to the tank 26 by return line 30. Connected between flow line 18 and return line 30 is a control valve 32. Control valve 32 is connected to flow line 18 between check valve 24 and pump 14. Also connected between flow line 18 and return line 30 is a proportional control valve 34. The proportional control valve 34 is connected to the flow line 18 between the check valve 24 and the pressure control valve 22.


The proportional control valve 34 is connected to a processor 36 having software 38. Also connected to the processor 36 is an operator command 40 such as a joystick command. A common approach to achieve proportional speed control and load independent control is to use a proportional flow control valve together with a hydraulic compensator where the proportion control valve controls the flow rate, or lower speed, and the hydraulic compensator maintains the speed regardless of the load weight.


In one example of the present system, the pressure transducer 29 is used to estimate the pressure in the cylinder 16. Thus, the hydraulic compensator may be eliminated and the software 38 is used to change the proportional control valve's 34 opening area to maintain the speed regardless of load weight.


In operation, the processor 36 receives a command signal from the joystick command 40 and a signal from the pressure transducer 20 that provides a pressure measurement. The joystick command 40 from an operator represents the expectation of the operator on the lowering speed of the platform. The pressure measurement is used by the processor 36 to estimate the load on the platform. Using the software 38, the processor determines a valve command based upon the joystick command 40 and the pressure measurement. The desired valve command is then sent from the processor 36 to the proportional control valve 24 to achieve the desired opening area of the proportional control valve.


For example, the joystick command 40 is used as a desired lowering speed, which defines V in Equation 2. The pressure measurement is approximated as the pressure differential ΔP in Equation 1. The processor 36 is used to calculate the correct opening area Aorifice so that the desired speed can be achieved based on the weight of the load in the platform. Look up tables or other techniques can be used to make the software 38 easy to tune and more flexible for different systems.


Thus, as has been disclosed, is a control system that enables the lowest actuation speeds to be achieved without violating the operating envelope of the power pack pump. This is accomplished by using a proportional control valve to divert pump flow away from the cylinder and back to the tank.


From the above discussion and accompanying figures and claims it will be appreciated that the hydraulic control system for linear actuation 10 offers many advantages over the prior art. It will be appreciated further by those skilled in the art that other various modifications could be made to the device without parting from the spirit and scope of this invention. All such modifications and changes fall within the scope of the claims and are intended to be covered thereby. It should be understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changes in the light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included in the spirit and purview of this application.

Claims
  • 1. A hydraulic control system for linear actuation, comprising: an electric motor connected to a hydraulic pump; a hydraulic cylinder connected to the pump by a first flow line; a pressure transducer, a pressure control valve, and a check valve connected to the first flow line between the pump and the cylinder; a tank connected to the pump by a second flow line and the cylinder by a return line; and a control valve connected between the first flow line and the return line.
  • 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the control valve is connected to the first flow line between the check valve and the pump.
  • 3. The system of claim 2 further comprising a proportional control valve connected between the first flow line and the return line.
  • 4. The system of claim 3 wherein the proportional control valve is connected to the flow line between the check valve and the pressure control valve.
  • 5. The system of claim 2 wherein the proportional control valve is connected to a processor and an operator command.
  • 6. The system of claim 5 wherein an opening area of the proportional control valve is controlled by the processor.
  • 7. The system of claim 6 wherein the processor controls the proportional control valve based upon a pressure measurement.
  • 8. The system of claim 7 wherein the pressure measurement is determined from a command signal from the operator command and a signal from the pressure transducer.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2021/036558 6/9/2021 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63036639 Jun 2020 US