This application is a national stage application of International Application No. PCT/EP2016/069399, filed Aug. 16, 2016, which claims priority to European Patent Application No. 15182321.8 filed Aug. 25, 2015, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference and to which priority is claimed.
The invention relates to a hydraulic controller for a hydraulically actuated liftable and lowerable hook of a crane, wherein the hydraulic system comprises at least one working machine, which is designed as a hydraulic motor and drives the winch, and at least one drive machine, which is designed, in particular, as a pump, wherein the working machine is connected directly or indirectly to at least one of the drive machines by means of two connections via corresponding working lines, which connections serve as a feed or return depending of the operating state of the working machine, and wherein a lowering brake valve is provided in one working line and is connected to the other working line via a control line in such a way that the lowering brake valve is displaceable against a restoring force by the pressure, which prevails in the other working line and is forwarded via the control line, from the blocking position of said valve into a through-flow position for lowering the hook by means of the winch, in particular a primary winch.
Such hydraulic controllers in which a hydraulic resistor in the control line and a hydraulic resistor in the outflow line determine the opening pressure of the lowering brake valve are known from practice. A disadvantage here is that a targeted control of the lowering is thus not possible. Either the lowering takes place securely, but slowly, or there is the risk of vibrations and/or cavitation in the case of excessively large lowering, depending on the design of the hydraulic resistors.
It is an object of the invention to avoid the aforementioned disadvantages and to specify a hydraulic controller by means of which the risk of unstable states is reduced or even avoided.
This object is achieved in that an outflow line leading back to a tank branches off from the control line, wherein, for an adjustment of the control pressure acting on the lowering brake valve to different values, the outflow line is provided with a switching possibility, by means of which the effective hydraulic resistance in the outflow line can be changed to at least two different values by open-loop or closed-loop control.
Examples of hydraulic resistors which come into consideration are orifice plates, throttles or mixed forms.
For an adjustment of the control pressure acting on the lowering brake valve to different values, the control line can be provided with a switch between internal and external control. Here, the signal of the external control can be limited in such a way that complete opening of the lowering brake valve is not possible.
A fraction of the pressure is channeled away through the outflow line leading back to the tank, with the result that the pressure acting on the lowering brake valve is reduced by this fraction. If the two parallel hydraulic resistors, in particular orifice plates, are operated simultaneously in the outflow line leading back to the tank, a greater feed-through results, with the result that the pressure acting on the lowering brake valve is reduced and the lowering proceeds more slowly.
With the external control activated, the pressure feedback in the drive machine/pump remains constant and the latter continues in its basic state, which can be, for example, about 30 bar. In this respect, a switch between secured fine control and standard switching can be achieved. A fine control is thus also possible if no block and tackle is present and thus the lowering travel is proportional to the rotational speed of the working machine.
The working line which serves as a feed during the prevailing operating state of the working machine can preferably be loaded with a volumetric flow which controls the working speed and which can be changed at least in certain operating states via a gas pedal and/or a joystick. Furthermore, a control line can connect the working line which serves as a return during the prevailing operating state of the working machine to the switching possibility for loading the loading the switching possibility by the back pressure which, on account of the line resistance, results in the working line which serves as a return during the prevailing operating state of the working machine.
Alternatively, a different open-loop or closed-loop control is also possible, such as, for example, an active, for example electric, control. Here, the switching possibility can also be actuated in dependence on the valve path of the lowering brake valve. The coupling can be arbitrary, for example mechanical, hydraulic or in some other form.
The switching possibility can also be configured as a combined component and comprise a switchable hydraulic resistor, in particular an orifice plate.
According to the invention, the value of the smaller hydraulic resistance can be 0.66 times or 0.85 times the value of the larger hydraulic resistance or the diameter of the smaller orifice plate can be about 0.66 times or 0.85 times the diameter of the larger orifice plate. As a departure, however, all ratio values from 0 to 1 are possible.
Furthermore, for the switch between internal and external control of the control pressure acting on the lowering brake valve through the control line, there can be provided two hydraulic resistors, preferably orifice plates of different diameter, which are provided in parallel to one another, of which the larger hydraulic resistor or the orifice plate with the smaller diameter can be switched via a switching possibility between an activated state and a deactivated state, wherein these two hydraulic resistors or orifice plates open into the control line via a change-over valve. A finer control is possible as a result.
For the switch between internal and external control of the control pressure acting on the lowering brake valve through the control line, there can also be provided a change-over between two orifice plates of different diameter which are connected to a 3/2 way valve and are provided in parallel to one another.
Here, it is possible in each case for the value of the smaller hydraulic resistance to be 0.6 times the value of the larger hydraulic resistance diameter or for the diameter of the smaller orifice plate to be 0.6 times the diameter of the larger orifice plate. As a departure, however, all ratio values from 0 to 1 are possible.
In addition, a nonreturn valve can further be provided in the line section with the smaller hydraulic resistance, in particular with the larger orifice plate, through which nonreturn valve flow can pass only in the direction from the smaller hydraulic resistance, in particular the larger orifice plate, to the 3/2-way valve.
The external control can preferably be assigned a dedicated pump from which it is supplied. The external control can also be connected to the drive machine designed as a pump.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention which are illustrated in the drawings are explained hereinbelow. In the drawings:
Corresponding reference signs are used for like or identical components in all the figures.
In the working line 2, which serves as a return during lowering, there is provided—as illustrated in
For an adjustment of the control pressure acting on the lowering brake valve 3 to different values, the control line 4 is provided with a control switch 5 for switching between internal and external control. For this purpose, an outflow line 6 leading back to the tank (not illustrated in the drawing) branches off from the control line 4 between the control switch 5 and the lowering brake valve 3, in which outflow line there is further provided an orifice switch 7 pertaining to first and second hydraulic resistors 8, 9 in the form of first and second orifice plates 8, 9 of different diameters that are provided in parallel to one another. Specifically, a diameter of the first orifice plate 8 is larger than the diameter of the second orifice plate 9. In other words, the first and second hydraulic resistors 8, 9 have different constant hydraulic resistances.
Here, it is possible to switch between the first orifice plate 8 and the second orifice plate 9 via the orifice switch 7, which is formed by a 3/2-way valve, wherein fast lowering of the hook occurs with the smaller second orifice plate 9 and more stable operation with slow lowering of the hook occurs with the larger first orifice plate 8, and wherein, furthermore, the signal of the external control is limited in such a way that complete opening of the lowering brake valve 3 is not possible. Here, the diameter of the smaller second orifice plate 9 is about 0.66 times the diameter of the larger first orifice plate 8.
A fraction of the pressure is channeled away through the outflow line 6 leading back to the tank, with the result that the pressure acting on the lowering brake valve 3 is reduced by this fraction. If the larger orifice plate 8 is operated in the outflow line 6 leading back to the tank, a greater feed-through results, with the result that the control pressure acting on the lowering brake valve 3 is reduced and lowering takes place more slowly.
The control switch 5 for switching between internal and external control is formed by a 3/2-way valve. A nonreturn valve 12 is further provided in a line section 13 with the larger orifice plate 11, through which nonreturn valve flow can pass only in the direction from the larger orifice plate 11 to the 3/2-way valve.
A supplemental control line 17 connects the working line 2 which serves as a return during the prevailing operating state of the working machine 15 to the orifice switch 7 for loading the orifice switch 7 by the back pressure which, on account of the line resistance, results in the working line 2 which serves as a return during the prevailing operating state of the working machine 15.
In the further exemplary embodiment illustrated in
The change-over valve 14 is “actuated” by a control switch 25 and the pressure which acts depending on the switching state of the control switch 25. In the further exemplary embodiment illustrated in
The third exemplary embodiment shown in
The fourth exemplary embodiment shown in
In the variant shown in
The variant shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15182321 | Aug 2015 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/069399 | 8/16/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/032641 | 3/2/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3173550 | Province | Mar 1965 | A |
10359063 | Shan | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20120285152 | Sugano et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130311051 | Torii | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102008064136 | Jan 2010 | DE |
2083164 | Mar 1982 | GB |
11199181 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001089079 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2004292102 | Oct 2004 | JP |
Entry |
---|
JP 2001089079 A machine translation to English (Year: 2001). |
JP H11199181 A machine translation to English (Year: 1999). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180257915 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |