Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6681730
-
Patent Number
6,681,730
-
Date Filed
Tuesday, August 27, 200222 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, January 27, 200420 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Denion; Thomas
- Chang; Ching
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 123 9011
- 123 9012
- 123 9015
- 123 9016
- 123 9017
- 123 9024
- 123 9035
- 123 9055
- 123 9049
- 251 12901
- 251 12902
- 251 12905
- 251 12916
- 251 48
- 251 54
- 092 143
- 092 85 B
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A hydraulic system for an electromechanical valve is provided. The system includes a housing defining a chamber for holding fluid extending along an axis. The system further includes a damper stem disposed in the chamber configured to move along the axis. The damper stem is configured to be directly coupled to the valve member. The system further includes a piston coupled to the damper stem dividing the chamber into a first chamber portion and a second chamber portion. The housing includes a conduit extending between the first chamber portion and the second chamber portion. The conduit has a first non-cylindrical opening communicating with the first chamber portion. When the piston moves past at least a portion of the non-cylinder opening, the cross-sectional area of the opening decreases to restrict fluid flow from the first chamber to reduce a velocity of the piston.
Description
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a hydraulic damper for an electromechanical valve, and in particular, to a hydraulic damper that can provide relatively soft seating of an engine valve on an engine valve seat.
2. Background Art
Internal combustion engines have been designed that utilize electromechanically actuated intake and exhaust valves. Known electromechanical valves use first and second solenoids to induce an inner armature to move in first and second axial directions, respectively. The armature may be coupled to a valve member that opens and closes a respective port to an engine cylinder. A problem associated with known electromechanical valves is that it is extremely difficult to control the landing speed (i.e., the seating speed) of a valve head against a valve seat. If the landing speed is too high, the engine valve seat can become degraded.
In an attempt to solve this problem, a known system in U.S. Pat. No. 5,832,883 utilized a hydraulic damper for reducing the seating speed in an electromechanical valve assembly. In this damper system, a piston is disposed in a chamber filled with oil. The piston is connected to a valve member and separates the chamber into an upper portion and a lower portion. The piston also contains a constant area orifice extending therethrough. The first and second chamber portions are also connected by a conduit. As the piston moves in a first direction, fluid is pushed through the conduit (and the constant area orifice) from the first chamber portion to the second chamber portion. When the piston moves proximate an end position and closes off an opening to the conduit, the constant area orifice continues to allow fluid to pass from the first chamber portion to the second chamber portion. The fluid flow through the constant area orifice, however, prevents the damping pressure in the first chamber from reaching a relatively high pressure. Further, the reduced damping pressure in the first chamber portion can result in the valve member—connected to the damper piston—having a relatively high seating speed when it contacts the valve seat. As discussed above, the relatively high landing speed may undesirably degrade the valve seat and valve member.
Another known hydraulic damper is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,205,964. The hydraulic damper includes a damping piston that only contacts a valve member near a valve seating position. However, a problem with this damper is that intermittently contacting of the valve member against a damper piston can generate undesirable noise.
Thus, the inventors herein have recognized that a hydraulic damper for electromechanical valve assemblies is needed that can reduce and/or eliminate one or more of the above-mentioned deficiencies.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
A hydraulic system in accordance with the present invention provides relatively soft seating for a valve member on an engine valve seat.
The hydraulic system for an electromechanical valve includes a housing defining a chamber for holding fluid extending along an axis. The system further includes a damper stem disposed in the chamber configured to move along the axis. The damper stem is configured to be directly coupled to a valve member. The system further includes a piston coupled to the damper stem dividing the chamber into a first chamber portion and a second chamber portion. The housing includes a conduit extending between the first chamber portion and the second chamber portion. The conduit has a first non-cylindrical opening communicating with the first chamber portion. When the piston moves past at least a portion of the non-cylinder opening, the cross-sectional area of the opening decreases to restrict fluid flow from the first chamber to reduce a velocity of the piston. The area of this opening continues to decrease as the valve approaches its seat.
The hydraulic system in accordance with the present invention provides a substantial advantage over known systems. In particular, the hydraulic system utilizes a conduit having a non-cylindrical opening to control a damping force prior to and during valve seating to dramatically reduce a seating velocity.
Another advantage of the present system is that the damper stem of the damper can be directly coupled to an engine valve member to remove any undesirable contact noise between a valve member and a component of the damper.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
is a schematic of vehicle engine having an electromechanical valve assembly with a hydraulic damper in accordance with the present invention.
FIGS. 2 and 3
are schematics of the electromechanical valve assembly of
FIG. 1
in first and second operational positions.
FIG. 4
is a cross-sectional schematic of a portion of a hydraulic damper in accordance with the present invention used in the electromechanical valve assembly of FIG.
2
.
FIG. 5
illustrates velocity curves of a valve member prior to valve seating using the inventive hydraulic damper and a conventional damper.
FIG. 6
illustrates damping force curves of the inventive hydraulic damper and a conventional damper prior to valve seating.
FIG. 7
illustrates effective orifice area curves of the inventive hydraulic damper and a conventional damper prior to valve seating.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring now to the drawings, like reference numerals are used to identify identical components in the various views. Referring to
FIG. 1
, a vehicle
10
having an engine control system
12
, an engine
14
, and an oil pump
16
is illustrated. The engine
14
includes an electromechanical valve assembly
18
mounted to an engine head
20
. The valve assembly
18
includes an electromechanical actuator
21
and a hydraulic damper
22
in accordance with the present invention.
Engine control system
12
includes engine controller
24
and current driver
26
. Controller
24
generates control signals to control an operational position of a valve member
28
of valve assembly
18
. The current driver
26
receives the control signals from controller
24
and in response generates current signals to energize and de-energize coils
30
,
32
of actuator
21
to control the position of valve member
28
, as will be explained in greater detail below. As illustrated, controller
24
includes a central processing unit (CPU)
34
, a read only memory (ROM)
36
, a random access memory (RAM)
38
, and input/output (I/O) ports
40
.
As discussed above, electromechanical valve assembly
18
includes electromechanical actuator
21
and damper
22
. Actuator
21
is provided to control gas flow through a port
42
communicating with an engine cylinder (not shown). Actuator
21
can be disposed in an intake port or an exhaust port communicating with the engine cylinder. In particular, actuator
21
controls an axial position of valve member
28
to control gas flow through port
42
. Referring to
FIG. 2
, actuator
21
includes actuator housing
44
, valve member
28
, coils
30
,
32
, armature plate
46
and spring retainer plate
48
attached to member
28
, and springs
50
,
52
,
54
,
56
. As illustrated, housing
44
encloses the remaining of the actuator components and may be mounted to engine head
20
via conventional fasteners (not shown).
Referring to
FIG. 3
, when coil
32
is de-energized by controller
24
, springs
54
,
56
induces valve member
28
to move upwardly so that a valve head
58
approaches valve seat
60
. During this movement, coil
30
is energized causing armature plate
46
to move toward coil
30
—which in turn causes valve head
60
to be seated against a valve seat
60
in fully closed position. The closed position of valve member
58
is illustrated in FIG.
1
. Thus, gas flow through port
42
is prevented from either entering or exiting an engine cylinder (not shown).
Referring to
FIG. 1
, when coil
30
is de-energized, springs
50
,
52
induce valve member
28
to move downwardly so that valve head
58
moves away from valve seat
60
. Referring to
FIG. 3
, during this movement, coil
32
is energized which causes armature plate
46
to be attracted toward coil
32
and valve head
58
to be moved to a fully open position. The fully open position is illustrated in FIG.
3
. Thus, gas flow through port is allowed to enter or exit an engine cylinder through port
42
.
Referring to
FIG. 2
, hydraulic damper
22
in accordance with the present invention is provided to allow relatively soft seating of valve head
58
on valve seat
60
. Damper
22
includes a housing
62
, a damper stem
64
, a piston
66
, a retaining nut
68
, and a washer
70
.
Housing
62
is provided to form a chamber
72
for holding a damping fluid such as engine oil. Chamber
72
comprises a top plate
74
, a body portion
76
, and a side plate
78
.
Top plate
74
and side plate
78
may be attached to body portion
76
via conventional fasteners (not shown) to form chamber
72
. Top plate
74
has a bore
79
extending therethrough for communicating oil from engine oil pump
16
to chamber
72
. The pump
16
provides lubrication oil to several engine components, like bearings for example, and the oil that would normally be provided to an engine camshaft is now delivered to chamber
72
, at the same pressure that is required by the other engine components. Lubrication pressure is typically regulated between
10
and
80
P.S.I. Body portion
76
includes a bottom plate
80
and annular attachment portion
82
—axially extending from plate
80
—that may be attached to a receiving portion
84
of housing
62
. In particular, attachment portion
82
may have external threads (not shown) that couple to threads disposed on an internal surface of receiving portion
84
of actuator
21
.
Damper stem
64
extends along an axis
86
through chamber
72
of housing
62
and is coupled to a valve stem
90
of valve member
28
. In particular, damper stem
64
may have an internal threaded bore
88
that threadably receives one end of valve stem
90
. Thus, valve stem
90
and damper stem
64
are coupled together and move in unison in first and second axial directions.
Piston
66
is coupled around damper stem
64
between a washer
70
and a retainer nut
68
. Piston
66
is provided to divide chamber
72
into a chamber portion
92
above the piston
66
and a chamber portion
94
below the piston
66
. Housing
62
also includes a conduit
96
which extends between chamber portions
92
,
94
.
When damper stem
64
and piston
66
move axially upwardly, the volume of chamber portion
92
decreases and the volume of chamber portion
94
increases. Further, fluid in portion
92
is moved through conduit
96
to chamber portion
94
. Because the fluid must travel through conduit
96
before entering the chamber portion
94
, a pressure differential occurs where the pressure in portion
94
is lower than the pressure in portion
92
. This pressure differential between the portions
92
,
94
produces a damping force in portion
92
opposing motion in a first axial direction (upward direction in FIG.
2
). When the piston
66
begins to close off an opening
98
of conduit
96
, fluid flow is further restricted from portion
92
to portion
94
. This fluid restriction increases the damping force in chamber portion
92
which further reduces the velocity of piston
66
, damper stem
64
, and valve member
28
—during valve seating—which will be described in greater detail below.
Similarly, when damper stem
64
and piston
66
move axially downwardly, the volume of chamber portion
94
decreases and the volume of chamber portion
92
increases. Further, fluid in portion
92
is moved through conduit
96
to portion
94
. Because the fluid must travel through the conduit
96
before entering the chamber portion
92
, a pressure differential occurs where the pressure in portion
92
is lower than the pressure in portion
94
. This pressure differential between the chamber portions
92
,
94
produces a damping force in portion
94
opposing motion in a second axial direction (downward direction in FIG.
2
). When the piston
66
begins to close off an opening
100
of conduit
96
, fluid flow is further restricted from chamber portion
92
to portion
94
. This fluid restriction increases the damping force in chamber portion
94
which further reduces the velocity of piston
66
, damper stem
64
and valve member
28
—which will be described in greater detail below.
Referring to
FIGS. 2 and 4
, a detailed explanation of how the damper
22
operates prior to and during valve seating will now be discussed. As illustrated, conduit
96
includes valve openings
98
,
100
communicating with chamber portions
92
,
94
. Because openings
98
,
100
can have a similar shape and operating characteristic, only opening
98
will be discussed in detail. As shown, opening
98
includes first and second opening portions
102
,
104
. The second opening portion
104
tapers over a predetermined distance, such as 1 mm for example, to provide an increasing damping force in chamber
92
prior to valve seating. The portion
104
can also be configured to provide a linear or non-linear decrease in the velocity of valve member
28
as it approaches a seating position. For example, the portion
104
shown in
FIG. 4
provides a substantially linear decrease in the velocity of valve member
28
as it approaches the seating position against valve seat
60
. It should be noted that the taper angle (θ) and axial distance (D) of second opening portion
104
can be varied based upon a desired velocity profile prior to and during valve seating.
Referring to
FIG. 7
, a graph of the effective area of the second opening portion
104
is shown during the last
1
mm of travel of piston
66
, damper stem
64
, and valve member
28
before valve seating occurs. In particular, curve
106
illustrates the effective cross-sectional area of opening portion
104
decreasing substantially linearly toward a zero effective area as piston
66
approaches the seating position (SP) where valve head
58
is seated against valve seat
60
. Referring to
FIG. 6
, a graph of the damping force generated in chamber portion
92
during the last 1 mm of travel of damper stem
64
and valve member
28
is shown. As shown by curve
108
, the damping force in chamber portion
92
is maintained at over
280
Newtons, for example, prior to valve seating. This damping force causes the velocity of piston
66
, damper stem
64
, and valve member
28
, shown by curve
110
in
FIG. 5
, to smoothly approach 0 m/s during valve seating.
The inventive damper system provides a substantial advantage over known systems, such as the constant area orifice system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,832,883. Referring
FIG. 5
, the curve
112
represents the response of the conventional constant area orifice, assuming a piston size of 20 mm, during the final 1 mm of travel prior to valve seating. As shown, the velocity of the conventional system is approximately 0.8 m/s just prior to valve seating—as compared to a seating velocity of 0.1 m/s of the inventive damping system
22
. Thus, the inventive damper
22
substantially reduces the velocity of valve member
28
as compared to the conventional system.
Further, as shown in
FIG. 6
, the damping force in chamber portion
92
is maintained at approximately 280 N just prior to valve seating as compared to 180 N of damping force generated by the known system. Accordingly, the inventive system maintains a greater damping force prior to valve seating for a given piston diameter, as compared to the known systems. Thus, the piston size of the damper can be reduced as compared to known systems for a desired damping force—which reduces the reciprocating mass of the electromechanical valve and undesirable mid-travel drag and friction forces acting on the damper piston. Thus, overall power consumption of an electromechanical valve assembly is reduced.
Claims
- 1. A hydraulic damper for an electromechanical valve, the valve having a valve member, comprising:a housing defining a chamber for holding fluid extending along an axis; a damper stem disposed in said chamber configured to move along said axis, said damper stem configured to be directly coupled to the valve member; and a piston coupled concentrically around said damper stem dividing said chamber into a first chamber portion and a second chamber portion, said housing having a conduit extending between said first chamber portion and said second chamber portion, said conduit having a first non-circular opening communicating with said first chamber portion, wherein when said piston moves past at least a portion of said non-circular opening, the effective cross-sectional area of said non-circular opening decreases substantially linearly, restricting fluid flow from said first chamber to reduce a velocity of said piston.
- 2. The hydraulic damper of claim 1 wherein when said damper stem is moved in a first axial direction said piston displaces fluid from said first chamber portion through said conduit to said second chamber portion until said piston closes off said non-circular opening of said conduit.
- 3. The hydraulic damper of claim 1 wherein said first non-circular opening of said conduit includes a tapered portion.
- 4. The hydraulic damper of claim 1 wherein said conduit has a second non-cylindrical opening communicating with said second chamber portion.
- 5. The hydraulic damper of claim 1 wherein said housing is configured to be mounted to the electromechanical valve.
- 6. The hydraulic damper of claim 1 wherein said piston has no bypass orifices extending therethrough allowing fluid communication between said first chamber portion and said second chamber portion.
- 7. A hydraulic damper for an electromechanical valve, the valve having a valve member, comprising:a housing defining a chamber for holding fluid extending along an axis; a damper stem disposed in said chamber configured to move along said axis, said damper stem configured to be directly coupled to the valve member; and a piston coupled concentrically around said damper stem dividing said chamber into a first chamber portion and a second chamber portion, said housing having a conduit extending between said first chamber portion and said second chamber portion, said conduit having a first opening with a tapered portion communicating with said first chamber portion, wherein when said piston moves past said tapered portion of said first opening in a first direction, the effective cross-sectional area of said opening decreases, restricting fluid flow from said first chamber portion to reduce a velocity of said piston.
- 8. The hydraulic damper of claim 7 wherein the effective cross-sectional area of said first opening decreases substantially linearly when said piston moves past said tapered portion of said first opening.
- 9. The hydraulic damper of claim 7 wherein said piston has no bypass orifices extending therethrough allowing fluid communication between said first chamber portion and said second chamber portion.
US Referenced Citations (12)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
3853102 |
Myers et al. |
Dec 1974 |
A |
3887019 |
Reynolds et al. |
Jun 1975 |
A |
4883025 |
Richeson, Jr. |
Nov 1989 |
A |
5275136 |
Schechter et al. |
Jan 1994 |
A |
5832883 |
Bae |
Nov 1998 |
A |
6024060 |
Buehrle, II et al. |
Feb 2000 |
A |
6076490 |
Esch et al. |
Jun 2000 |
A |
6101992 |
Pischinger et al. |
Aug 2000 |
A |
6116570 |
Ulgatz et al. |
Sep 2000 |
A |
6192841 |
Vorih et al. |
Feb 2001 |
B1 |
6205964 |
Maisch et al. |
Mar 2001 |
B1 |
6237550 |
Hatano et al. |
May 2001 |
B1 |
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
2650362 |
Feb 1991 |
FR |