The present application is a national stage of and claims priority of International patent application Serial No. PCT/EP2017/061851, filed May 17, 2017, and published in English as WO/2017/198718.
The present invention relates to a hydraulic device comprising a housing having a shaft which is mounted in the housing and rotatable about a first axis of rotation. The shaft has a flange extending transversely to the first axis. A plurality of pistons is fixed to the flange at equiangular distance about the first axis of rotation. A plurality of cylindrical sleeves having sleeve bottoms and sleeve jackets, respectively, cooperate with the pistons to form respective compression chambers of variable volume. The cylindrical sleeves are rotatable about a second axis of rotation which intersects the first axis of rotation by an acute angle such that upon rotating the shaft the volumes of the compression chambers change between bottom dead center and top dead center of the pistons within the sleeves. Each piston has a piston head including a circumferential wall of which the outer side is ball-shaped, hence forming a sealing line within the cooperating sleeve jacket, where the inner side surrounds a cavity.
In the afore-mentioned device, the radial deformation of the sleeve jacket depends on the depth that the piston is inserted in the sleeve, but the radial expansion at the sealing line can almost be constant at different positions of the piston within the sleeve. Furthermore, the asymmetric hydrostatic load on the outer side of the piston head, the thin-wailed piston head deforms to an oval shape during the compression phase, i.e. when the distance between the piston head and the sleeve bottom decreases. Under operating conditions the piston expansion more or less follows the piston sleeve expansion during the compression phase. Consequently, leakage flow between the piston head and the sleeve jacket at the sealing line is minimized.
Since the sleeve bottom causes increased stiffness or a portion of the sleeve jacket which is adjacent to the sleeve bottom, radial deformation of the sleeve jacket at the sealing line decreases when the distance between the sleeve bottom and the piston head becomes smaller. As a consequence, the piston and sleeve jacket may scratch each other near the sleeve bottom, i.e. when top dead center lies close to the sleeve bottom. For this reason the dimensions of the pistons and cooperating sleeves are matched on the basis of the critical condition when the piston head and the sleeve bottom approach each other.
An aspect of the invention is to provide a hydraulic device with tight tolerances between the pistons and the cooperating sleeves whereas minimizing the risk of scratching between the piston heads and the sleeve jackets.
In an embodiment of a hydraulic device, each sleeve jacket has such a thin wall and/or is elastically movable with respect to the sleeve bottom such that at a fixed pressure in the compression chamber the radial deformation of the sleeve jacket at the sealing line is substantially constant at piston positions ranging from bottom dead center to a position where the distance between the sleeve bottom and the sealing line is less than 50% of the distance between the sleeve bottom and the sealing line at bottom dead center.
Due to a relatively thin wall of the sleeve jacket its stiffness is also relatively low such that the radial deformation at the sealing line remains substantially constant at a fixed pressure in the compression chamber at different positions of the piston in the direction from bottom dead center to top dead center over a relatively long distance. A similar effect is achieved when the sleeve jacket is elastically movable in radial direction with respect to the sleeve bottom. This means that the risk of contact between the piston head and the sleeve jacket upon approaching the sleeve bottom is relatively low. Furthermore, the relatively small stiffness allows a relatively tight tolerance between the piston head and the sleeve jacket near top dead center. Even if the piston head tends to contact the sleeve jacket, the sleeve jacket may be deformed and/or moved with respect to the sleeve bottom by the piston head at a relatively low force. In that case the piston may deform to a less oval shape and the sleeve jacket may deform to a more oval shape. It is noted that the radial deformation of the sleeve jacket between the sleeve bottom and the sealing line may be relatively large due to the small stiffness, but that is not relevant since it is the radial deformation at the sealing line which dictates leakage flow and not the radial deformation between the sleeve bottom and the sealing line. It is noted that the sleeve can be a single part.
An additional advantage of a relatively thin wall of the sleeve jacket is a relatively low weight of the sleeve. Particularly, for hydraulic devices which are operated at high rotational speed centrifugal forces on the sleeves are minimized causing reduced tendency of the sleeves to tilt with respect to a barrel place by which they are supported.
It is noted that the term substantially constant may be defined as varying between ±10% or ±5% of the average value.
The radial deformation may be substantially constant to a position where the distance between the sleeve bottom and the sealing line is less than 40% of the distance between the sleeve bottom and the sealing line at bottom dead center.
The distance between the sleeve bottom and the sealing line at top dead center may be smaller than 30% of the distance between the sleeve bottom and the sealing line at bottom dead center. This means that the sealing line at top dead center may lie close to the sleeve bottom. When using a sleeve jacket of a larger wall thickness the distance between the sleeve bottom and cop dead center might be increased to achieve a comparable constant radial deformation profile over a long distance from bottom dead center, but this leads to a larger dead volume between the sleeve bottom and top dead center. This would be disadvantageous in terms of efficiency and noise emission.
In practice the sleeve may be made of steel whereas the wall thickness of the sleeve jacket can be smaller than 1.5 mm. For example, the sleeve jacket may have a wall thickness of 1.1 mm and an inner diameter of 11.8 mm, whereas the sleeve length may be 15 mm.
In more general terms, the wall thickness of the sleeve jacket may be smaller than 13% of the outer diameter of the sleeve jacket and/or smaller than 13% of the length of the sleeve jacket. For example, the wall thickness of the sleeve jacket lies within the range of 5-13% of the outer diameter of the sleeve jacket, or possibly within the range of 8-12% thereof.
The sleeve jacket can be elastically movable with respect to the sleeve bottom when the sleeve has a locally reduced wall thickness at the transition between the sleeve jacket and the sleeve bottom. In this case the sleeve jacket does not necessarily have an extremely thin wall. In fact, the locally reduced wall thickness functions as an elastic pivot between the sleeve jacket and the sleeve bottom.
The locally reduced wall thickness may be located in the sleeve jacket and may be formed, for example, by opposite circumferential recesses located at the inner side and outer side of the sleeve jacket.
Alternatively, the locally reduced wall thickness may be located in the sleeve bottom and may be formed, for example, by a circumferential recess located at the inner side of the sleeve.
It is noted that the angle between the first axis of rotation and the second axis of rotation may have a maximum value of 8-15′.
Aspects of the invention will hereafter be elucidated with reference to very schematic drawings showing embodiments of the invention by way of example.
The hydraulic device 1 comprises face plates 7 which are mounted inside the housing 27 at a distance from each other. The face plates 7 have a fixed position with respect to the housing 27 in rotational direction thereof. The shaft 2 extends through central through-holes in the face plates 7.
The shaft 2 is provided with a flange 8 which extends perpendicularly to the first axis of rotation 4. A plurality of pistons 9 are fixed at both sides of the flange 8 at equiangular distance about the first axis of rotation 4, in this case fourteen pistons 9 on either side. The pistons 9 have center lines which extend parallel to the first axis of rotation 4. The planes of the face plates 7 are angled with respect to each other and with respect to the plane of the flange 8.
Each of the pistons 9 cooperates with a cylindrical sleeve 10 to form a compression chamber 11 of variable volume. The hydraulic device 1 as shown in
The sleeve bottoms 12 of the respective cylindrical sleeves 10 are supported by respective barrel plates 15 which are fitted around the shaft 2 by means of respective ball hinges 16 and are coupled to the shaft 2 by means of keys 17. Consequently, the barrel plates 15 rotate together with the shaft 2 under operating conditions. The barrel plates 15 rotate about respective second axes which are angled with respect to the first axis of rotation 4. This means that the cylindrical sleeves 10 also rotate about the respective second axes of rotation. As a consequence, upon rotating the shaft 2 the volumes of the compression chambers 11 change. During rotation of the barrel plates 15 each cylindrical sleeve 10 makes a combined translating and swiveling motion around the cooperating piston 9. Therefore, the outer side of each piston head 14 is ball-shaped. The ball-shape creates a sealing line between the piston 9 and the sleeve jacket 13.
The sides of the respective barrel plates 7 which are directed away from the flange 8 are supported by respective supporting surfaces of the face plates 7. Due to the inclined orientation of the supporting surfaces of the face plates 7 with respect to the flange 8 the barrel plates 15 pivot about the ball hinges 16 during rotation with the shaft 2. The angle between the first axis of rotation 4 and the respective second axes of rotation is approximately nine degrees in practice, but may be smaller or larger.
The barrel plates 15 are pressed against the respective face plates 7 by means of springs 18 which are mounted in holes in the shaft 2. The compression chambers 11 communicate via a central through-hole having a diameter D1 (
In the embodiment as shown in
An essential difference between the sleeve jackets 13 having different wall thicknesses is that the length along which the radial deformation remains substantially constant as measured from bottom dead center is relatively long for the sleeve jacket 13 having the thinnest wall. The radial deformation reaches its constant value at 8 mm from the sleeve bottom 12, whereas in case of the thin sleeve jacket the deformation reaches its constant value already at 5 mm from the sleeve bottom 12.
Due to the thin wall of the sleeve jacket 13 in the embodiment as shown in
From the foregoing it can be concluded that due to the thin wall of the sleeve jacket and/or elastically movability of the sleeve jacket with respect to the sleeve bottom, the sleeve jacket deformation of the sleeve jacket is not affected by the sleeve bottom or affected by the sleeve bottom to a limited extent.
The invention is not limited to the embodiment shown in the drawings and described hereinbefore, which may be varied in different manners within the scope of the claims and their technical equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16170442 | May 2016 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/061851 | 5/17/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/198718 | 11/23/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3434429 | Goodwin | Mar 1969 | A |
3648567 | Clark | Mar 1972 | A |
3948111 | Dittrich | Apr 1976 | A |
3958456 | Jacobson | May 1976 | A |
4223594 | Gherner | Sep 1980 | A |
4361077 | Mills | Nov 1982 | A |
4703682 | Hansen | Nov 1987 | A |
4776257 | Hansen | Oct 1988 | A |
5249506 | Willimczik | Oct 1993 | A |
5415530 | Shilling | May 1995 | A |
5636561 | Pecorari | Jun 1997 | A |
5794514 | Pecorari | Jun 1998 | A |
5778757 | Kristensen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5960697 | Hayase et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6283721 | Gollner | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293768 | Shintoku et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312231 | Kuhne et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6629822 | Larkin et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6663354 | Forster | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6802244 | Stoppek | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7311034 | Achten | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328647 | Achten | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7470116 | Dantlgraber | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7731485 | Achten | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8794938 | Frey | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20050017573 | Achten | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019171 | Achten | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050201879 | Achten | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060051223 | Mark et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060120881 | Dantlgraber | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060222516 | Achten | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070251378 | Nelson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090007773 | Zhu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090084258 | Stoezer | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090196768 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090290996 | Ishizaki | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100119394 | Frey | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101313148 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101523052 | Sep 2009 | CN |
2130514 | Dec 1972 | DE |
3519783 | Dec 1986 | DE |
102006021570 | Oct 2007 | DE |
102008012404 | Sep 2009 | DE |
1508694 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1855002 | Nov 2007 | EP |
2012010 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2446348 | Aug 2008 | GB |
2005514552 | May 2005 | JP |
2005522631 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2009531590 | Sep 2009 | JP |
1019736 | Jul 2003 | NL |
1020932 | Jul 2003 | NL |
8600662 | Jan 1986 | WO |
2003058035 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004055369 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2006083163 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007060822 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, dated Aug. 8, 2017 for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2017/061851, filed May 17, 2017. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 8, 2017 for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2017/061851, filed May 17, 2017. |
“Volumetric losses of a multi piston floating cup pump”, Peter A.J. Achten; Proceedings of the National Conference on Fluid Power; 337-348; Proceedings of the 50th National conference on fluid power by National Fluid Power Association; 2005, NCFP I05-10.2. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/099,366, filed Nov. 6, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/099,369, filed Nov. 6, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190211811 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |