This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present invention, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Well completion operations in the oil and gas industry often involve hydraulic fracturing (often referred to as fracking or fracing) to increase the release of oil and gas in rock formations. Hydraulic fracturing involves pumping a fluid (e.g., frac fluid) containing a combination of water, chemicals, and proppant (e.g., sand, ceramics) into a well at high pressures. The high pressures of the fluid increases crack size and crack propagation through the rock formation releasing more oil and gas, while the proppant prevents the cracks from closing once the fluid is depressurized. Fracturing operations use high-pressure pumps to increase the pressure of the frac fluid. Unfortunately, the proppant in the frac fluid increases wear and maintenance on the high-pressure pumps.
Various features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying figures in which like characters represent like parts throughout the figures, wherein:
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. These described embodiments are only exemplary of the present invention. Additionally, in an effort to provide a concise description of these exemplary embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
As discussed in detail below, the frac system or hydraulic fracturing system includes a hydraulic energy transfer system that transfers work and/or pressure between a first fluid (e.g., a pressure exchange fluid, such as a substantially proppant free fluid) and a second fluid (e.g., frac fluid, such as a proppant-laden fluid). For example, the first fluid may be at a first pressure between approximately 5,000 kPa to 25,000 kPa, 20,000 kPa to 50,000 kPa, 40,000 kPa to 75,000 kPa, 75,000 kPa to 100,000 kPa or greater than the second pressure of the second fluid. In operation, the hydraulic energy transfer system may or may not completely equalize pressures between the first and second fluids. Accordingly, the hydraulic energy transfer system may operate isobarically, or substantially isobarically (e.g., wherein the pressures of the first and second fluids equalize within approximately +/−1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 percent of each other).
The hydraulic energy transfer system may also be described as a hydraulic protection system, hydraulic buffer system, or a hydraulic isolation system, because it blocks or limits contact between a frac fluid and various hydraulic fracturing equipment (e.g., high-pressure pumps), while still exchanging work and/or pressure between the first and second fluids. By blocking or limiting contact between various pieces of hydraulic fracturing equipment and the second fluid (e.g., proppant containing fluid), the hydraulic energy transfer system reduces abrasion/wear, thus increasing the life/performance of this equipment (e.g., high-pressure pumps). Moreover, it may enable the frac system to use less expensive equipment in the fracturing system, for example high-pressure pumps that are not designed for abrasive fluids (e.g., frac fluids and/or corrosive fluids). In some embodiments, the hydraulic energy transfer system may be a hydraulic turbocharger, a rotating isobaric pressure exchanger (e.g., rotary IPX), or a non-rotating isobaric pressure exchanger (e.g., bladder, reciprocating isobaric pressure exchanger). Rotating and non-rotating isobaric pressure exchangers may be generally defined as devices that transfer fluid pressure between a high-pressure inlet stream and a low-pressure inlet stream at efficiencies in excess of approximately 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, or 90% without utilizing centrifugal technology.
As explained above, the hydraulic energy transfer system transfers work and/or pressure between first and second fluids. These fluids may be multi-phase fluids such as gas/liquid flows, gas/solid particulate flows, liquid/solid particulate flows, gas/liquid/solid particulate flows, or any other multi-phase flow. Moreover, these fluids may be non-Newtonian fluids (e.g., shear thinning fluid), highly viscous fluids, non-Newtonian fluids containing proppant, or highly viscous fluids containing proppant. The proppant may include sand, solid particles, powders, debris, ceramics, or any combination therefore.
In order to block contact between the first and second fluids, the hydraulic turbocharger 40 includes a wall 62 between the first and second sides 42, 46. The wall 62 includes an aperture 64 that enables the shaft 58 (e.g., cylindrical shaft) to extend between the first and second impellers 50 and 56 but blocks fluid flow. In some embodiments, the hydraulic turbocharger 40 may include gaskets/seals 66 (e.g., annular seals) that may further reduce or block fluid exchange between the first and second fluids.
In some embodiments, a controller using sensor feedback may control the extent of mixing between the first and second fluids in the rotary IPX 160, which may be used to improve the operability of the fluid handling system. For example, varying the proportions of the first and second fluids entering the rotary IPX 160 allows the plant operator to control the amount of fluid mixing within the hydraulic energy transfer system 12. Three characteristics of the rotary IPX 160 that affect mixing are: (1) the aspect ratio of the rotor channels 190, (2) the short duration of exposure between the first and second fluids, and (3) the creation of a fluid barrier (e.g., an interface) between the first and second fluids within the rotor channels 190. First, the rotor channels 190 are generally long and narrow, which stabilizes the flow within the rotary IPX 160. In addition, the first and second fluids may move through the channels 190 in a plug flow regime with very little axial mixing. Second, in certain embodiments, the speed of the rotor 166 reduces contact between the first and second fluids. For example, the speed of the rotor 166 may reduce contact times between the first and second fluids to less than approximately 0.15 seconds, 0.10 seconds, or 0.05 seconds. Third, a small portion of the rotor channel 190 is used for the exchange of pressure between the first and second fluids. Therefore, a volume of fluid remains in the channel 190 as a barrier between the first and second fluids. All these mechanisms may limit mixing within the rotary IPX 160. Moreover, in some embodiments, the rotary IPX 160 may be designed to operate with internal pistons that isolate the first and second fluids while enabling pressure transfer.
In
In
In
In
As illustrated, the first fluid low-pressure pump 234 fluidly couples to the first fluid high-pressure pump 236. In operation, the first fluid low-pressure pump 234 receives the first fluid (e.g., proppant free fluid, substantially proppant free fluid) and increases the pressure of the first fluid for use by the first fluid high-pressure pump 236. The first fluid may be a combination of water from a water tank 244 and chemicals from a chemical tank 246. However, in some embodiments, the first fluid may be only water or substantially water (e.g., 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 95, or more percent water). The first fluid high-pressure pump 236 then pumps the first fluid through a high-pressure inlet 240 and into the hydraulic energy transfer system 12. The pressure of the first fluid then transfers to the second fluid (e.g., proppant laden fluid, frac fluid), which enters the hydraulic energy transfer system 12 through a second fluid low-pressure inlet 242. The second fluid is a frac fluid containing proppant (e.g., sand, ceramic, etc.) from a proppant tank 248. After exchanging pressure, the second fluid exits the hydraulic energy transfer system 12 through a high-pressure outlet 250 and enters the well 14, while the first fluid exits at a reduced pressure through the low-pressure outlet 252. In some embodiments, the frac system 10 may include a boost pump 254 that further raises the pressure of the second fluid before entering the well 14.
After exiting the outlet 252 at a low-pressure, the first fluid may be recirculated through the first fluid pumps 18 and/or pass through the mixing tank 256. For example, a three-way valve 258 may control whether all of or a portion of the first fluid is recirculated through the first fluid pumps 18, or whether all of or a portion of the first fluid is directed through the mixing tank 256 to form the second fluid. If the first fluid is directed to the mixing tank 256, the mixing tank 256 combines the first fluid with proppant from the proppant tank 248 to form the second fluid (e.g., frac fluid). In some embodiments, the mixing tank 256 may receive water and chemicals directly from the water tank 244 and the chemical tank 246 to supplement or replace the first fluid passing through the hydraulic energy transfer system 12. The mixing tank 256 may then combine these fluids with proppant from the proppant tank 248 to produce the second fluid (e.g., frac fluid).
In order to control the composition (e.g., the percentages of chemicals, water, and proppant) and flow of the first and second fluids, the frac system 10 may include a controller 260. For example, the controller 260 may maintain flow, composition, and pressure of the first and second fluids within threshold ranges, above a threshold level, and/or below a threshold level. The controller 260 may include one or more processors 262 and a memory 264 that receives feedback from sensors 266 and 268; and flow meters 270 and 272 in order to control the composition and flow of the first and second fluids into the hydraulic energy transfer system 12. For example, the controller 260 may receive feedback from sensor 266 that indicates the chemical composition of the second fluid is incorrect. In response, the controller 260 may open or close valves 274 or 276 to change the amount of chemicals entering the first fluid or entering the mixing tank 256 directly. In another situation, the controller 260 may receive a signal from the flow meter 272 in the first fluid flow path that indicates a need for an increased flow rate of the first fluid. Accordingly, the controller 260 may open valve 278 and valve 274 to increase the flow of water and chemicals through the frac system 10. The controller 260 may also monitor the composition (e.g., percentage of proppant, water, etc.) of the second fluid in the mixing tank 256 with the level sensor 268 (e.g., level control). If the composition is incorrect, the controller 260 may open and close valves 258, 274, 276, 278, 280, and 282 to increase or decrease the flow of water, chemicals, and/or proppant into the mixing tank 256. In some embodiments, the frac system 10 may include a flow meter 270 coupled to the fluid flow path of the second fluid. In operation, the controller 260 monitors the flow rate of the second fluid into the hydraulic energy transfer system 12 with the flow meter 270. If the flow rate of the second fluid is too high or low, the controller 260 may open and close valves 258, 274, 276, 278, 280, and 282 and/or control the second fluid pumps 20 to increase or reduce the second fluid's flow rate.
In operation, the first fluid low-pressure pump 234 receives the first fluid (e.g., proppant free fluid, substantially proppant free fluid) and increases the pressure of the first fluid for use by the first fluid high-pressure pump 236. The first fluid may be water from the water tank 244, or a combination of water from the water tank 244 and chemicals from the chemical tank 246. The first fluid high-pressure pump 236 then pumps the first fluid through a high-pressure inlet 240 and into the rotary IPX 160. The pressure of the first fluid then transfers to the second fluid (e.g., proppant containing fluid, such as frac fluid), entering the rotary IPX 160 through a second fluid low-pressure inlet 242. After exchanging pressure, the second fluid exits the rotary IPX 160 through a high-pressure outlet 250 and enters the well 14, while the first fluid exits at a reduced pressure through the low-pressure outlet 252. In some embodiments, the frac system 10 may include a boost pump 254 that further raises the pressure of the second fluid.
As the first and second fluids exchange pressures within the rotary IPX 160, some of the second fluid (e.g., leakage fluid) may combine with the first fluid and exit the rotary IPX 160 through the low-pressure outlet 252 of the rotary IPX 160. In other words, the fluid exiting the low-pressure outlet 252 may be a combination of the first fluid plus some of the second fluid that did not exit the rotary IPX 160 through the high-pressure outlet 250. In order to protect the first fluid pumps 18, the frac system 10 may direct a majority of the combined fluid (i.e., a mixture of the first and second fluids) to the mixing tank 256 where the combined fluid is converted into the second fluid by adding more proppant and chemicals. Any excess combined fluid not needed in the mixing tank 256 may be sent to a separator 300 (e.g., separator tank, hydro cyclone) where proppant is removed, converting the combined fluid into the first fluid. The substantially proppant free first fluid may then exit the separator 300 for recirculation through the first fluid pumps 18. The remaining combined fluid may then exit the separator tank 300 for use in the mixing tank 256. The ability to direct a majority of the combined fluid exiting the rotary IPX 160 into the mixing tank 256 enables the frac system 10 to use a smaller separator 300 while simultaneously reducing thermal stress in the frac system 10. For example, as the high-pressure pump 236 pressurizes the first fluid, the pressurization heats the first fluid. By sending a majority of the previously pressurized first fluid through the mixing tank 256 and then into the well 14, the frac system 10 reduces thermal stress on the first fluid pumps 18, the rotary IPX 160, and other frac system 10 components. Moreover, a smaller separator may reduce the cost, maintenance, and footprint of the frac system 10.
In the mixing tank, water 256, chemicals, and proppant are combined in the proper percentages/ratios to form the second fluid (e.g., frac fluid). As illustrated, the mixing tank 256 couples to the proppant tank 248, the chemical tank 246, the rotary IPX 160 through the low-pressure outlet 252, the separator 300, and the water tank 244. Accordingly, the mixing tank 256 may receive fluids and proppant from a variety of sources enabling the mixing tank 256 to produce the second fluid. For example, in the event that the combined fluid exiting the rotary IPX 160 through the low-pressure outlet 252 is insufficient to form the proper mixture of the second fluid, the frac system 10 may open a valve 302 enabling water from the water tank 244 to supplement the combined fluid exiting the rotary IPX 160. In order to block the flow of fluid from the water tank 244 into the separator 300 the frac system 10 may include check valves 303. After obtaining the proper percentages/ratios to form the second fluid (e.g., frac fluid), the second fluid exits the mixing tank 256 and enters the second fluid pumps 20. The second fluid pumps 20 then pump the second fluid (e.g., proppant-laden fluid, frac fluid) into the rotary IPX 160. In the rotary IPX 160, the first fluid contacts and increases the pressure of the second fluid driving the second fluid out of the rotary IPX 160 and into the well 14.
In order to control the composition (e.g., percentages of chemicals, water, and proppant) and flow of the first and second fluids, the frac system 10 may include a controller 260. For example, the controller 260 may maintain flow, composition, and pressure of the first and second fluids within threshold ranges, above a threshold level, and/or below a threshold level. The controller 260 may include one or more processors 262 and a memory 264 that receive feedback from sensors 266 and 268; and flow meters 270 and 272 to control the composition and flow of the first and second fluids into the rotary IPX 160. For example, the controller 260 may receive feedback from sensor 266 that indicates the chemical composition of the second fluid is incorrect. In response, the controller 260 may open or close a valve 274 to change the amount of chemicals entering the mixing tank 256. In some embodiments, the controller 260 may also monitor the percentage of proppant, water, etc. in the second fluid in the mixing tank 256 with the level sensor 268 (e.g., level control). If the composition is incorrect, the controller 260 may open and close valves 274, 282, and 302 to increase or decrease the flow of water, chemicals, and/or proppant into the mixing tank 256. In another situation, the controller 260 may receive a signal from the flow meter 272 that indicates the flow rate of the first fluid is too high or low. The controller 260 may then increase or decrease the speed of the low-pressure pump 234 to change the flow rate of the first fluid. The frac system 10 may also monitor the flow rate of the second fluid with the flow meter 270. If the flow rate of the second fluid is too high or low, the controller 260 may manipulate the valves 302 and 304; and/or increase/decrease the speed of the second pumps 20. In some embodiments, the controller 260 may also monitor a sensor 306 (e.g., vibration, optical, magnetic, etc.) that detects whether the rotary IPX 160 is no longer rotating (e.g., stalled). If the rotary IPX 160 stalls, the controller 160 may open a bypass valve 308 and close valves 304, 310, and 312 to block the flow of fluid from the low-pressure outlet 252 to the mixing tank 256, as well as block the flow of the first fluid through the first fluid pumps 18. The controller 260 may then open the valve 302 to pump water directly into the mixing tank 256 to produce the second fluid. The second fluid low-pressure pump 238 will then pump the second fluid through the rotary IPX 160 and bypass valve 308 to the first fluid pumps 18. The first fluid pumps 18 will then increase the pressure of the second fluid driving the second fluid through the rotary IPX 160 and into the well 14 for fracing. In this manner, the frac system 10 of
While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 17/013,318, entitled “Frac System with Hydraulic Energy Transfer System,” filed Sep. 4, 2020, which is a divisional of U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 15/935,478, entitled “Frac System with Hydraulic Energy Transfer System,” filed Mar. 26, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 14/505,885, entitled “Frac System with Hydraulic Energy Transfer System,” filed on Oct. 3, 2014, which claims priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/886,638, entitled “Isobaric Pressure Exchanger Protection for Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Pumps,” filed Oct. 3, 2013, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/033,080, entitled “Frac System with Hydraulic Energy Transfer System,” filed Aug. 4, 2014, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2897762 | Houvener | Aug 1959 | A |
3489394 | Stogner | Jan 1970 | A |
3560053 | Ortloff | Feb 1971 | A |
3773438 | Hall et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3967542 | Hall et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3981622 | Hall et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4478561 | Elliston | Oct 1984 | A |
5797429 | Shumway | Aug 1998 | A |
5899272 | Loree | May 1999 | A |
6659731 | Hauge | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6773226 | Al-Hawaj | Aug 2004 | B2 |
8573309 | Simmons | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8678514 | Efthymiou et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8727004 | Bull et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
9328743 | Hirosawa et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9546671 | Hirosawa et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20020025264 | Polizos et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020146325 | Shumway | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050166978 | Brueckmann et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060037895 | Shumway | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037907 | Shumway | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20090071902 | Stover et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090301719 | Bull et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090301725 | Case et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110008182 | Krogsgard | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110176936 | Andrews | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120217011 | Dotson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20150184502 | Krish et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150292310 | Ghasripoor et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160032691 | Richter et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160061185 | Vad | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160160889 | Hoffman et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2773019 | Sep 2013 | CA |
2004076742 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2012193578 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2013076379 | Apr 2013 | JP |
2016105653 | Jul 2006 | RU |
57434 | Oct 2006 | RU |
2352844 | Apr 2009 | RU |
Entry |
---|
Australian Examination Report for AU Application No. 2014331601 dated Nov. 23, 2017; 3 pages. |
Australian Examination Report for AU Application No. 2014331601 dated Sep. 8, 2017; 4 pages. |
Russian Office Action for RU Application No. 2016117063 dated Jun. 15, 2017; 13 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for CA Application No. 2,932,691 dated Mar. 1, 2017; 3 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US2014/059157; dated Jun. 23, 2015; 14 pages. |
Farooque, A.M., et al.; “Comparative Study of Various Energy Recovery Devices used in SWRO Process”, Saline Water Desalination Research Institute, issued as Technical Report No. TR.3807/EVP02005 in Dec. 2004; pp. 1-44. |
Yihui, Zhou, et al., “Rotary Pressure Exchanger for SWRO”, School of Chemical Machinery, Dalian University of Technology, China (www.intechopen.com), Expanding Issues in Desalination, 2011, pp. 1-20. |
Guirguis, Mageed Jean; “Energy Recovery Devices in Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plants with Emphasis on Efficiency and Economical Analysis of Isobaric versus Centrifugal Devices” Scholar Commons, Graduate Thesis and Dissertations, 2011 (Part 1, 1-62 pgs; Part 2, 1-61 pgs). |
El-Ghonemy, A.M.K.; “Waste Energy Recovery in Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plants”, Elsevier, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, 2012, pp. 4016-4028. |
EP Ofice Action, Application No. 14787331.9-1005, dated Dec. 9, 2019; pp. 1-7. |
European Examination Report for EP Application No. 14787331.9 dated Feb. 13, 2018; 9 pages. |
Lozier J et al.: “The Hydraulic Turbocharger: A New Type of Device for the Reduction of Feed Pump Energy Consumption in Reverse Osmosis Systems”, Desalination, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 75, No. 1/03, Nov. 1, 1989 (Nov. 1, 1989), pp. 71-83, XP000201291, ISSN: 0011-9164, DOI: 10.1016/0011-9164(89)85006-4. |
Stover et al. “Seawater reverse osmosis with isobaric energy recovery devices”, Desalinat, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 203, No. 1-3, Jan. 24, 2007 (Jan. 24, 2007), pp. 168-175, XP005856949, ISSN: 0011-9164, DOI: 10.1016/J.DESAL.2006.03.528. |
Rief et al: “Solar-thermal powered desalination: its significant challenges and potential”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Nov. 14, 2005 (Nov. 14, 2005), pp. 152-165, XP055447505, DOI: 10.2016/j.rser.2015.03.065; Retrieved from the internet: URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267771476_ENERGY_RECOVERY_DEVICE_PERFORMANCE_ANALYSIS (retrieved on Feb. 2, 2018). |
Sun J. et al: “Energy Recovery Device with a Fluid Switcher for Seawater Reverse Osmosis System”, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, CN, vol. 16, No. 2, Apr. 1, 2008 (Apr. 1, 2008), pp. 329-332, XP022856577, ISSN: 1004-95401, DOI: 10.2016/S1004-9541 (08)60083-X (retrieved on Apr. 1, 2008). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210140292 A1 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62033080 | Aug 2014 | US | |
61886638 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15935478 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 17013318 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17013318 | Sep 2020 | US |
Child | 17152612 | US | |
Parent | 14505885 | Oct 2014 | US |
Child | 15935478 | US |