1. Field
The field of invention relates generally to blowout preventer (BOP) equipment, and specifically to creating redundancy in BOP equipment to prevent and reduce the need for downtime and repairs.
2. Description of the Related Art
BOP systems are hydraulic systems used to prevent blowouts from subsea oil and gas wells. BOP equipment typically includes a set of two or more redundant control systems with separate hydraulic pathways to operate a specified BOP function. The redundant control systems are commonly referred to as blue and yellow control pods. In known systems, a communications and power cable sends information and electrical power to an actuator with a specific address. The actuator in turn moves a hydraulic valve, thereby opening fluid to a series of other valves/piping to control a portion of the BOP.
At times, the hydraulic elements in each of these redundant systems may fail to operate as intended, and necessitate that the control system switch master controls from one pod to the other. At this point, the drilling operator loses redundancy in the system, because there is no functioning back-up pod. As a result, the operator may be required to suspend operations and pull the BOP stack from the sea floor for costly downtime and repairs.
One problem with creating redundancy in hydraulic systems is that hydraulic systems are typically hard-plumbed, and are not capable of being readily re-configured or repaired. Due to size and weight constraints, functionality of the control system has been limited in the industry to only the necessary functions, and internal hydraulic redundancy has not been built into existing systems.
Previous methods for addressing system redundancy include having multiple back-up systems. Remotely operated vehicles (ROV's) and acoustic control systems have been used as back-ups; they, however, require a different controls interface and often lead to a degradation in system performance. Thus, they are often a method of last resort.
Embodiments of the invention include a method for isolating leaking hydraulics in subsea equipment, wherein an operator reassigns electric controls from the surface to spare subsea valves that are connected to the equipment. The method includes isolating problem hydraulic elements so that the control pod does not require switching. Furthermore, a method of re-assigning electrical actuators to spare hydraulic valves makes it possible to replace functionality lost when a problem is isolated. After the problem is isolated and the re-assignment is completed, the original user interface remains unchanged, which mitigates risk of operator confusion. Other rig specific information is also maintained such as emergency disconnect sequences and safety interlocks, because the main controller is still active.
Also included are systems and methods of reconnecting the pod to a BOP function after isolation and re-assignment to maintain full system redundancy, performance, and interface. In the drawings submitted herewith, the following acronyms have the following meanings HVR—hydraulic variable ram, CSR—casing shear ram, BSR—blind shear ram, ROV—remotely operated vehicle.
Each of the parts shown in the system topology view may not be required in the exact configuration shown. In embodiments where a different “standard” flow path for a hydraulic system is used, the redundant flow paths of the present technology can be updated to look different, but act the same. For example, in some embodiments the flow path can be as follows: manual regulator to pod select to hydraulic regulator to solenoid to sub-plate mounted (SPM) component to shuttle to the BOP. In alternate embodiments, components can be removed, added, or reordered as desired in the flow path to create different redundant paths. Those elements shown in the drawings are typical, but other manifestations could be made.
Embodiments of the invention herein shown and described have many benefits and advantages. For example, with the ability to isolate, re-assign, and re-route hydraulic fluid on any of the BOP functions, the process effectively provides a means of subsea control pod repair while maintaining total system redundancy. In addition, the hydraulic pathways are also reconfigurable, allowing operators to readily adapt the control system for additional functions or new requirements over the life of the system. This built-in spare capacity is field ready because the software and electronics are suited to the changes, and do not require additional engineering software or hardware updates. Testing of the technology described herein indicates that the methods and systems of the present invention increase control system mean time between failure (MTBF) by a factor of about 2.56. In other words, if the MTBF were about 100 days for a particular system, using embodiments of the present systems and methods could increase the MTBF to about 256 days.
Therefore, disclosed herein is a blowout preventer (BOP) system for providing additional redundancy and reliability. The system includes a first set of components including a BOP control pod with a primary regulator and a secondary regulator, where the primary regulator and the secondary regulator are arranged in a parallel configuration; a hydraulic supply line in communication with the BOP control pod; a pod select valve in communication with the primary regulator and the secondary regulator; and a bypassable hydraulic regulator in communication with the pod select valve; and a second set of components, the bypassable hydraulic regulator disposed between the pod select valve and the second set of components, where a hydraulic regulator bypass line bypasses the bypassable hydraulic regulator between the pod select valve and the second set of components.
In some embodiments, the system further includes an alternative BOP control pod, the alternative BOP control pod comprising an alternative primary regulator and an alternative secondary regulator, where the alternative primary regulator and the alternative secondary regulators are arranged in a parallel configuration; an alternative hydraulic supply line, in communication with the alternative BOP control pod; an alternative pod select valve, in communication with the alternative primary regulator and the alternative secondary regulator of the alternative BOP control pod; and an alternative bypassable hydraulic regulator, in communication with the alternative pod select valve, where the alternative bypassable hydraulic regulator is disposed between the alternative pod select valve and an alternative set of the second set of components, and where an alternative hydraulic regulator bypass line bypasses the alternative bypassable hydraulic regulator between the alternative pod select valve and the alternative second set of components.
In some other embodiments, the second set of components further comprises a primary hydraulic manifold comprising a valve, the primary hydraulic manifold in communication with BOP stack shuttles to perform at least one function; a spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold comprising a valve where the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold is operable to perform a function of the primary hydraulic manifold; and an isolation valve, where the isolation valve is operable to prevent flow from the hydraulic supply line to the primary hydraulic manifold and direct the flow from the hydraulic supply line to the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold.
Still in other embodiments, the alternative set of the second set of components further comprises: a primary hydraulic manifold comprising a valve, the primary hydraulic manifold in communication with BOP stack shuttles to perform at least one function; a spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold comprising a valve where the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold is operable to perform a function of the primary hydraulic manifold; and an isolation valve, where the isolation valve is operable to prevent flow from the alternative hydraulic supply line to the primary hydraulic manifold and direct the flow from the alternative hydraulic supply line to the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold.
In some embodiments, the second set of components further comprises: a primary hydraulic manifold comprising a valve, the primary hydraulic manifold in communication with BOP stack shuttles to perform at least one function; a spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold comprising a valve where the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold is operable to perform a function of the primary hydraulic manifold; and a flexible connection disposed between the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold and the BOP stack shuttles. In other embodiments, the flexible connection is connected between the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold and the BOP stack shuttles at remotely operated vehicle (ROV) stabs. In still other embodiments, the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold is supplied with hydraulic fluid from an alternative source selected from the group consisting of: an accumulator and a hot-line hose.
In some embodiments, the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold is hard-piped to ROV stabs through a selection valve. In other embodiments, the alternative set of the second set of components further comprises: a primary hydraulic manifold comprising a valve, the primary hydraulic manifold in communication with BOP stack shuttles to perform at least one function; a spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold comprising a valve where the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold is operable to perform a function of the primary hydraulic manifold; and a flexible connection disposed between the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold and the BOP stack shuttles. In some embodiments, the flexible connection is connected between the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold and the BOP stack shuttles at ROV stabs.
Further disclosed herein is a blowout preventer (BOP) system for providing additional redundancy and reliability, the system including a first BOP control pod and a second BOP control pod, the first and second BOP control pods each comprising at least two redundant manual regulators in a parallel configuration; a hydraulic supply line, in communication with the first and second BOP control pods; a first bypassable hydraulic regulator in communication with the first BOP control pod and a second bypassable hydraulic regulator in communication with the second BOP control pod; a primary hydraulic manifold comprising a valve, the primary hydraulic manifold in communication with BOP stack shuttles to perform at least one function; a spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold comprising a valve where the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold is operable to perform a function of the primary hydraulic manifold; and an isolation valve, where the isolation valve is operable to prevent flow from the hydraulic supply line to the primary hydraulic manifold and direct the flow from the hydraulic supply line to the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold.
Additionally disclosed herein is a method for increasing mean time between failures (MTBF) of a BOP system. The method includes the steps of supplying hydraulic fluid by a hydraulic supply line to components of the BOP system through a primary regulator; isolating the primary regulator when the primary regulator fails; and redirecting hydraulic fluid through a secondary regulator, where the primary regulator and secondary regulators are arranged in a parallel configuration.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of supplying hydraulic fluid to components of the BOP system through a hydraulic regulator bypass line when a hydraulic regulator fails. In other embodiments, the method further includes the steps of utilizing a primary hydraulic manifold comprising a valve, where the primary hydraulic manifold is in communication with BOP stack shuttles to perform at least one function; and increasing redundancy in the BOP system with a spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold comprising a valve where the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold is operable to perform a function of the primary hydraulic manifold.
Still in other embodiments, the method further comprises the steps of: utilizing a primary hydraulic manifold comprising a valve, where the primary hydraulic manifold is in communication with BOP stack shuttles to perform at least one function; increasing redundancy in the BOP system with a spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold comprising a valve where the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold is operable to perform a function of the primary hydraulic manifold; and connecting a flexible connection between the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold and the BOP stack shuttles.
In some embodiments, the method includes the step of connecting the flexible connection between the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold and the BOP stack shuttles at ROV stabs. Still in other embodiments, the method includes the step of supplying the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold fluid from an alternative source selected from the group consisting of: an accumulator and a hot-line hose. In other embodiments, the spare, re-assignable hydraulic manifold is hard-piped to ROV stabs through a selection valve.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present disclosure are better understood with regard to the following Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments, appended Claims, and accompanying Figures.
The Specification, which includes the Summary, Brief Description of the Drawings and the Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments, and the appended Claims refer to particular features (including process or method steps) of the disclosure. Those of skill in the art understand that the invention includes all possible combinations and uses of particular features described in the Specification. Those of skill in the art understand that the disclosure is not limited to or by the description of embodiments given in the Specification. The inventive subject matter is not restricted except only in the spirit of the Specification and appended Claims.
Those of skill in the art also understand that the terminology used for describing particular embodiments does not limit the scope or breadth of the disclosure. In interpreting the Specification and appended Claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context of each term. All technical and scientific terms used in the Specification and appended Claims have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs unless defined otherwise.
As used in the Specification and appended Claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The verb “comprises” and its conjugated forms should be interpreted as referring to elements, components or steps in a non-exclusive manner. The referenced elements, components or steps may be present, utilized or combined with other elements, components or steps not expressly referenced. The verb “couple” and its conjugated forms means to complete any type of required junction, including electrical, mechanical or fluid, to form a singular object from two or more previously non-joined objects. If a first device couples to a second device, the connection can occur either directly or through a common connector. “Optionally” and its various forms means that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur. The description includes instances where the event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not occur.
Referring first to
BOP control pod 100 includes certain upstream and downstream components, described in detail below with regard to
Leakage of an element within a hydraulic pathway typically leads to switching of the control pod, such as for example from the blue pod to the yellow pod or vice versa. Such a switch leads to loss of redundancy between the pods. For example, if an element within hydraulic pathway in BOP control pod 100 leaks, such as hydraulic regulator 112, BOP control pod 100 can be deactivated for repair, and an alternative control pod can be used. However, in deactivating BOP control pod 100 and activating an alternative BOP control pod, redundancy in the system would be lost. While some or all critical functions may remain fully redundant, loss of any function in the control pod may require a switch and subsequent loss of redundancy.
Field studies have shown that SPM valves and solenoids are generally more reliable than regulators, shuttles, hoses, and piping. Thus, an SPM valve that cuts off flow in one path and opens flow in another path will increase availability, as its reliability does not impact the system as much as the functional elements it is making redundant. In other words, adding more reliable components to increase redundancy is more effective than adding components with increased risk of failure. By using the most reliable components, such as SPM valves and solenoids, to isolate paths with a failed component and open a new path, system availability is increased.
Referring now to
Referring now to
As shown in
However, if the active regulator fails in the active control pod, the back-up blue manual regulator 314 or the back-up yellow manual regulator 318 takes the place of the failing, or otherwise not completely functional, manual regulator (depending on which pod is active), and redundancy is maintained between the blue BOP control pod 311 and yellow BOP control pod 313. The optional fluid communication between pod select valves 320, 322 provides additional redundancy in the redundant BOP arrangement 310, because both blue BOP control pod 311 and yellow BOP control pod 313 could use all four regulators 312, 314, 316, 318 if required.
The added redundancy within the manual regulators prevents downtime if a certain manual regulator needs repair, because even with the loss of one unit, redundancy is not lost between the blue and yellow pods.
Referring now to
Similarly, active yellow manual regulator 420 and back-up yellow manual regulator 422 are arranged in a parallel configuration between accumulators 424, 426. Valves 428, 430, 432, and 434 are also shown. Manual regulators 420, 422 are external to or outside of the yellow control pod. The added redundancy within the manual regulators prevents downtime if a certain manual regulator needs repair, because even with the loss of one unit, redundancy is not lost between the blue and yellow pods. In either circuit, the active manual regulators 400, 420 can be isolated by the valves in case of failure and replaced by a back-up manual regulator 402, 422. Thus, redundancy is maintained even with the failure of one or both active manual regulators 400, 420.
In the embodiment of
One of skill in the art will realize that while valves 408, 410, 412, 414, 428, 430, 432, and 434 are shown as hydraulically piloted, the valves could be manually actuated valves in other embodiments provided that they performed substantially similar mechanical and hydraulic functions. Additionally, in other embodiments other valve arrangements with more or fewer valves could be utilized. For example, instead of eight separated 2-position valves, there could be fewer valves that have more integral positions. For example, valves 408 and 410 could be replaced by a single valve with multiple ports and positions.
BOP control systems use a variety of hydraulic control valves to operate blow out preventers. Normally-closed, 3-way, 2-position solenoid valves can be attached to a multiplex electronic control system to pilot normally closed SPM valve functions. In some embodiments, two solenoids and two SPM valves are required to operate a function. Both are normally closed. One solenoid is on or active and one is off or inactive. This will open or close the associated SPM valves to direct fluid in the correct direction. Flow from either control pod can be supplied to the function through the use of a shuttle valve, which is self-piloting based on which control pod is selected. Additional valves provide increased availability through the use of additional flow paths and by creating re-configurable valves.
A normally open valve can be used for isolation of a leaking circuit. Such a valve can be a hydraulically actuated or manual valve of various types such as SPM, ball valve, or a shear seal. Hydraulically piloted valves show distinct safety and availability increases due to software control; however, manual valves can be selected for increased reliability and decreased maintenance of a BOP system. Two, three, or four way valves can suffice provided they can isolate upstream supply to the hydraulic leak and provide sufficient flow rates to the hydraulic circuit.
A selector valve may be used in place of shuttles to send hydraulic fluid to the function after reassignment. The selector valve normally supplies fluid through the upstream shuttle bank to the function but may be switched to a secondary position that allows fluid from the reassigned source. This source can be a hard-piped supply from the control pod, supply from an ROV port, or a separate subsea accumulator bank such as a set of stack mounted accumulators. Each method provides advantages of reliability, flexibility, and system safety.
Hydraulically isolating regulators in parallel is a useful feature to maintain stability. Without the circuit being implemented as designed with the ability to isolate before switching regulators, instability of the hydraulic flow can occur which will damage equipment. In the instance that both manual regulators 400, 402 would fail subsea, the option is available for them to both be isolated and for regulated pressure to be supplied from the opposite control pod.
In the embodiment of
Referring now to
In the embodiment of
Now referring to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Now referring to
If SPM valve 906 must be isolated, solenoid 914 can communicate with SPM valve 916, which can be reassigned the function of SPM valve 906. In one embodiment, a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) could then be used to put ROV stab 918 in communication with a polyflex hose 920, which would subsequently be connected by ROV stab 922 to shuttle 924. Shuttle 924 is then operable to carry out function 912. In this way, redundancy is created for carrying out function 912.
Referring now to
In the BOP system 1000, yellow control pod 1006 is the active control pod currently in use, and blue control pod 1004 has a leaking valve 1016. The leaking valve 1016 is isolated by isolation valve 1018 by an operator via the HMI screen 1002. However, in isolating valve 1016 by way of isolation valve 1018, the connection 1020 between blue control pod 1004 and the stack shuttles 1022 is no longer active. Thus, without an alternative connection, redundancy between the blue control pod 1004, yellow control pod 1006, and the stack shuttles 1022 is lost. Losing redundancy could cause long delays as portions of BOP system 1000 are brought to the surface for repairs, or as portions of BOP system 1000 are brought offline for repair by ROVs.
Regarding stack shuttles, multiple inlet pathways exist to move the piston used to actuate the different BOP stack functions, blue and yellow control pods, acoustic control system, autoshear system, and ROV system. Shuttle valves are used to tie-in the multiple control system supply methods back to a single function. They are graphically represented as an OR Gate. Multiple shuttle valves are ‘stacked’ together to produce multiple input pathways for hydraulic fluid to reach the function piston. For instance, when fluid is supplied from the blue control pod, the shuttle valve shifts internally to seal off the entry point from the other control system inlets and allows the blue control pod fluid to exit the shuttle valve towards the function. Simplification of this shuttle stack is desired as it can cause failure to operate from multiple systems.
BOP system 1000, however, has redundant downstream components, and spare valve bank 1024 provides reassignable valve 1026, which can take over the functions of leaking valve 1016 by being reassigned via the HMI screen 1002, either by a user or automatically by a program, upon malfunction by leaking valve 1016. Additional spare valves 1028, 1030, and 1032 are also in communication with blue control pod 1004 and available for reassignment when additional functions of the valves in blue control pod 1004 are lost. Hydraulic line 1023 from blue control pod 1004 supplies hydraulic fluid to spare valve bank 1024 when needed. In the embodiment of
Reassignable valve 1026 can be made communicable with stack shuttles 1022 by flexible connection 1036 between ROV stabs 1034, 1038. Flexible connection 1036 can be a flexible hose, such as a polyflex hose, or any other suitable flexible connection for fluid communication between the ROV stabs 1034, 1038. Complete system redundancy (power and communications) is maintained in BOP system 1000, unlike in prior art systems, and the stack shuttles 1022 and BOP 1040 are in fluid communication with the active yellow control pod 1006 and the spare valve bank 1024 of blue control pod 1004.
In the embodiment of
The spare function valves 1214, 1216, 1218, and 1220 can be hard-piped by lines 1222, 1224, 1226, and 1228, respectively, to BOP stack shuttles 1206, 1208, 1210, and 1212, and hard-piped to ROV stabs 1230, 1232, 1234, and 1236. This arrangement maintains the normal capabilities of an ROV to connect a flexible connection, while adding a degree of reliability to the system by way of hard-piping.
Hydraulic line 1213 and accumulator 1215 can supply hydraulic fluid by valve 1217 to hydraulic line 1219. Hydraulic line 1219 supplies spare function valves 1214, 1216, 1218, and 1220 with hydraulic fluid when blue control pod 1204 is inactive. The spare function valves are hard-piped to the stack shuttles, but can also be placed in fluid communication with the stack shuttles by ROV stabs 1230, 1232, 1234, and 1236 with flexible hoses or similar connections. In other embodiments, more or fewer spare function valves and/or more or fewer ROV stabs could be provided and used.
Hydraulic regulator 1318 has a bypass line 1320 (similar to that described earlier with regard to
Solenoid 1324 is in fluid communication with SPM function valve 1328, which itself is in fluid communication with wedge, or piping, 1330 to shuttles 1332. Shuttles 1332 are in fluid communication to carry out a function 1334 in the BOP system 1300. Solenoid 1326, which can be reassigned if solenoid 1324 is lost, is in communication with reassigned SPM function valve 1336, which is also in communication with the shuttles 1332 to carry out the function 1334 in the BOP system 1300.
Referring now to
Lower stack 1404 further includes shuttle panel 1434, blind shear ram BOP 1436, casing shear ram BOP 1438, first pipe ram 1440, and second pipe ram 1442. BOP stack 1400 is disposed above wellhead connection 1444. Lower stack 1404 further includes optional stack-mounted accumulators 1446 containing a necessary amount of hydraulic fluid.
Each of the parts shown in the system topology view may not be required in the exact configuration shown. In embodiments where a different “standard” flow path for a hydraulic system is used, the redundant flow paths of the present technology can be updated to look different, but act the same. For example, in some embodiment the flow path can be as follows: manual regulator to pod select to hydraulic regulator to solenoid to sub-plate mounted (SPM) component to shuttle to the BOP. In alternate embodiments, components can be removed, added, or reordered as desired in the flow path to create different redundant paths. Those elements shown in the drawings are typical, but other manifestations could be made.
The invention herein shown and described has many benefits and advantages. For example, with the ability to isolate, re-assign, and re-route hydraulic fluid on any of the BOP functions, the process effectively is a means of subsea control pod repair while maintaining total system redundancy. In addition, the hydraulic pathways are also reconfigurable, allowing operators to readily adapt the control system for additional functions or new requirements over the life of the system. This built-in spare capacity is field ready because the software and electronics are suited to the changes, and do not require additional engineering software or hardware updates. Testing of the technology described herein indicates that the methods and systems of the present invention increase control system mean time between failure (MTBF) by about a factor of 2.56.
The new hydraulic architecture was analyzed for its availability using reliability block diagram analysis software simulations. The availability of the system was defined by the probability of the system to perform without the consequence of a BOP stack pull. The analysis showed that the new hydraulic architecture improved system probability to perform functions on demand and decreased down-time for drilling operations significantly. The mean time between failure (MTBF) for the system increased by a factor of 2.56 while unplanned down time decreased by a margin of 60%, and improvement in mean availability of 3.5% was shown. The results validate the increased complexity and cost associated with the design architecture to provide industry leading performance at a lower total cost and with enhanced safety.
A reliability block diagram is constructed and used to evaluate the reliability of the existing and proposed design concepts. A reliability block diagram (RBD) is a diagrammatic method for showing how component reliability contributes to the success or failure of a complex system. A RBD is drawn as a series of blocks connected in parallel or series configuration. Parallel paths are redundant, meaning that all of the parallel paths must fail for the parallel network to fail. By contrast, any failure along a series path causes the entire series path to fail. Each block represents a component of the system with a failure rate. Corrective and preventive maintenance can be defined for an individual block. A large number of simulations can be performed on an RBD to calculate various reliability metrics, including Mean Time between Failures, System Availability, System Downtime, Criticality Index of each block, etc.
This application is a non-provisional application and claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/155,671, filed on May 1, 2015, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3664376 | Watkins | May 1972 | A |
3865142 | Begun | Feb 1975 | A |
3902554 | Hooper | Sep 1975 | A |
3957079 | Whiteman | May 1976 | A |
4095421 | Silcox | Jun 1978 | A |
4109938 | Mitchell | Aug 1978 | A |
4174000 | Milberger | Nov 1979 | A |
4413642 | Smith | Nov 1983 | A |
4453566 | Henderson, Jr. | Jun 1984 | A |
4524832 | Roche | Jun 1985 | A |
4565349 | Tomlin | Jan 1986 | A |
4597447 | Roche | Jul 1986 | A |
4618173 | Dopyera | Oct 1986 | A |
4709726 | Fitzgibbons | Dec 1987 | A |
5314024 | Rodgers | May 1994 | A |
5778918 | McLelland | Jul 1998 | A |
5781192 | Kodimer | Jul 1998 | A |
5867150 | Bricklin | Feb 1999 | A |
6012518 | Pringle | Jan 2000 | A |
6040969 | Winch | Mar 2000 | A |
6041804 | Chatufale | Mar 2000 | A |
6053202 | Cunningham | Apr 2000 | A |
6070668 | Parks | Jun 2000 | A |
6102124 | Skeels | Aug 2000 | A |
6227300 | Cunningham | May 2001 | B1 |
6293344 | Nixon | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6491106 | Simonds | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6622799 | Dean | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6761222 | Wilson | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6835292 | Sato | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6957205 | Liongosari | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961226 | Mason, Jr. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990498 | Fenton | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000890 | Bell | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7111874 | Smith, III | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113668 | Sorum | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7216715 | Reynolds | May 2007 | B2 |
7222674 | Reynolds | May 2007 | B2 |
7261162 | Deans | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7337848 | Fraser | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7410003 | Ravensbergen | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7558684 | Patten | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7571772 | Reams | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7760670 | Causier | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7832706 | Judge | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849599 | Huff | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7887103 | Evans | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7913767 | Larson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7975770 | Keener | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8011436 | Christie | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8020623 | Parks | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8054593 | Reid | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8157025 | Johnson | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8157295 | Krywitsky | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8230735 | Chouzenoux | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8322436 | Maa | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8376051 | McGrath | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8388255 | Larson | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8403053 | Judge | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8464797 | Singh | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469048 | Bresnahan | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8602108 | Mathis | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8684092 | McGrath | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8708054 | Dailey, Jr. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8724957 | Oisel | May 2014 | B2 |
8781743 | McKay | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8812274 | Virkar | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8944403 | Jurena | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9057751 | Spencer | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9085948 | Egeland | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9151794 | Radan | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20030024705 | Whitby | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050199286 | Appleford | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070107904 | Donahue | May 2007 | A1 |
20090095464 | McGrath | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100300696 | McCalvin | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110266002 | Singh | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120018165 | Crossley | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120197527 | McKay | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120205561 | Baugh | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233128 | Solmer | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120234416 | McMiles | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120312546 | Bussear | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120318517 | Christensen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130054034 | Ebenezer | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130118755 | Kotrla | May 2013 | A1 |
20130253872 | Curtis | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130255956 | Gilmore | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283919 | Coonrod | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140048274 | Reynolds | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140061516 | Gustafson | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140064029 | Jaffrey | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140321341 | Kristiansen | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140361785 | Radan | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150015066 | Dong | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150041122 | Valsecchi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150101674 | Gustafson | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150129233 | Gaude | May 2015 | A1 |
20150184505 | Panicker-Shah | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198001 | McWhorter | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150233202 | Caldwell | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150260203 | Launonen | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201250646 | Jun 2009 | CN |
0001915 | Jan 2000 | WO |
2013192494 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
John S. Holmes et al., filed Sep. 30, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/870,249. |
John Steven Holmes et al., filed Oct. 15, 2015. U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,563. |
John S. Holmes et al., filed Nov. 11, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/938,074. |
Alex David Stibich et al., filed Dec. 9, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/963,849. |
Glen Allen Scott et al., filed Dec. 17, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/972,848. |
Michael James Connor et al., filed Dec. 16, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/971,381. |
William James Hatter et al., filed Dec. 17, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/972,266. |
Thomas David Beales et al., filed Dec. 16, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/971,669. |
Thomas David Beales et al., filed Dec. 16, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/971,305. |
Shanks et al., “OTC 23480 Enhanced Subsea Safety Critical Systems”, Offshore Technology Conference, pp. 1-10, May 3, 2012. |
Montague et al., “Summary of Blowout Preventer (BOP) Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) Analyses for the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement”, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, pp. 1-48, Jun. 27, 2013. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with corresponding Application No. PCT/US2016/023651 dated Jun. 13, 2016. |
McCord, “A Multiplex System for a Small Remotely Manned Submersible”, IEEE Ocean 1975, pp. 361-364, 1975. |
Hickok, “Practical Experience of Control Valve Behavior”, Subsea Control and Data Acquisition: Proceedings of an international conference, London, UK, pp. 195-203, Apr. 4-5, 1990. |
Martin et al., “A Proven Oil/Water/Gas Flowmeter for Subsea, Offshore Technology Conference”, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, pp. 589-596, May 6-9, 1991. |
Ali et al., “Subsea Valve Actuator for Ultra Deepwater”, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 1996 proceedings, pp. 799-809, May 6-9, 1996. |
Altamiranda et al., “Intelligent Supervision and Integrated Fault Detection and Diagnosis for Subsea Control Systems”, Oceans 2007 Europe, pp. 1-6, Jun. 18-21, 2007. |
Wang et al., “Water Hammer Effects on Water Injection Well Performance and Longevity”, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control,Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, pp. 1-10, Feb. 13-15, 2008. |
Vetcogray, “Capital Drilling Equipment”, Retrieved from http://site.ge-energy.com/businesses/ge—oilandgas/en/iterature/en/downloads/capital—drilling—equipment.pdf, pp. 1-15, 2008. |
Altamiranda et al., “Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis for Subsea Control Systems. A Subsystem Prototype”, Oceans 2009 Europe, pp. 1-6, May 11-14, 2009. |
Whitby et al., “20KSI BOP Stack Development”, SPE International, pp. 1-5, Feb. 2-4, 2010. |
Tang et al., “A Dynamic Simulation Study of Water Hammer for Offshore Injection Wells to Provide Operation Guidelines”, SPE Production & Operations, vol. No. 25, Issue No. 4, pp. 509-523, Nov. 2010. |
Shanks et al., “OTC 23473 New Generation Control System for 20 KSI Subsea BOP”, Offshore Technology Conference, pp. 1-12, May 3, 2012. |
Levine et al., “BSEE and BOEM Workshop with Government of Israel Application for Permit to Drill”, pp. 1-40, Jul. 24, 2012. |
Cai et al., “Reliability Analysis of Subsea Blowout Preventer Control Systems Subjected to Multiple Error Shocks”, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. No. 25, Issue No. 6, pp. 1044-1054, Nov. 1, 2012. |
Cai et al., “Application of Bayesin Networks to Reliability Evaluation of Software Systems for Subsea Blowout Preventers”, International Journal of Control and Automation, pp. 47-60, Feb. 28, 2013. |
Umofia., “Risk-Based Reliability Assessment of Subsea Control Module for Offshore Oil and Gas production”, Cranfield University, School of Engineering, Department of Offshore, Process and Energy Engineering, pp. 1-284, Sep. 2014. |
Chazal et al., “Enhancements in Fraction Measurements and Flow Modeling for Multiphase Flowmeters” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, pp. 1-19, Oct. 27-29, 2014. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with Related Application No. PCT/US2015/053238 dated Feb. 1, 2016. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with Related Application No. PCT/US2015/055915 dated Feb. 2, 2016. |
GE Oil & Gas, “GE's 20-ksi” BOP Completely Re-Engineered to Meet Demands of HPHT Reservoirs, Drilling Contractor, pp. 1-2, Feb. 17, 2016. |
Cameron., “Mark III Subsea MUX BOP Control System”, Drilling Pressure Control Equipment, Retrieved from http://www.c-a-m.com/products-and-services/drilling/drilling-pressure-control-equipment/mark-iii-subsea-mux-bop-control-system, pp. 1-4, Feb. 19, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160319622 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62155671 | May 2015 | US |