This application is a 371 National Phase of PCT International Application No. PCT/FI2011/050773 filed on Sep. 9, 2011, and published in English as WO 2013/034797 A1 on Mar. 14, 2013, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a novel design of a hydraulic steering arrangement for a thruster of a marine vessel. The hydraulic steering arrangement of the invention is specifically designed for thrusters intended to operate in an arctic environment where ice is present. As a consequence, the use and the requirements for the steering arrangement are significantly different compared to the standard steering arrangements for thrusters operating in open waters only.
A thruster as here understood is a steerable propulsion device arranged mainly beneath the hull of a marine vessel (see
Normally the steering arrangement of a thruster is intended to control the azimuth angle of the unit. The positioning of the mechanical thruster part is done by one or more hydraulic motors. JP52-77397 (Kawasaki Heavy Industries) for instance discusses a traditional hydraulic steering arrangement of a thruster. A proportional directional valve controls the oil flow from the hydraulic pump to the hydraulic steering motor. Once the correct azimuth angle is reached, the proportional valve is used to close the flow connection from the pump to the hydraulic motor as well as from the hydraulic motor back to the oil tank. The azimuth angle of the thruster is then maintained as both flow paths from the hydraulic motor are closed and the motor is, thus, not able to rotate.
A somewhat more detailed illustration of a hydraulic steering arrangement of a thruster is shown in
The counterbalance valve arrangements have been coupled to the hydraulic pipes connected to the ports of the hydraulic motor farther away than the safety valve arrangement. The counterbalance valve arrangement includes a check valve and a hydraulically operated pressure relief valve. The purpose of the counterbalance valve arrangements is to lock the steering i.e. maintain the thruster in the direction it has been turned by the proportional valve with the help of the hydraulic steering motor/s. At a steering phase the counterbalance valve arrangements function as follows. The first valve arrangement positioned at the inlet pipe of the steering motor/s allows the pressurized oil to flow via the check valve to the inlet port of the steering motor/s with a minimal pressure loss. In the second valve arrangement at the outlet pipe of the steering motor/s the pressure of the returning oil affects the pressure relief valve and opens it together with the pilot pressure from the pressure pipe between the proportional directional valve and the first counterbalance valve arrangement. Thus the returning oil has a certain counter pressure, i.e. a pressure loss takes place in the second counterbalance valve. When the steering action is stopped for maintaining the thruster at its direction, the proportional directional valve is moved to its centre position whereby the proportional valve forms a connection from the counter balance valves to the tank. Thus the connection from the pump to the counterbalance valve is closed. In such a case the steering motor/s is/are subjected to no internal load. However, the thruster may be subjected to external loads from the sea, whereby the thruster acts on the steering motor/s and tries to rotate such. In practice this means that the motor/s start/s acting as pump/s. The motor/s create/s oil pressure that acts on both the safety valve and one of the counterbalance valves of the counterbalance block. As long as the hydraulic motor/s has/have no internal leakage the thruster is not able to turn until the pressure exceeds the predetermined value required to open the safety or counterbalance valve. When the value is exceeded the pressurized oil flows from the outlet port of the steering motor/s to the inlet port/s or to the tank.
However, now that the thrusters have gained acceptance in marine vessels that are used in arctic conditions, too, the loads, and especially the torque ice subjects to thrusters have to be taken in careful consideration. The torque exerted by ice loads on the thrusters may reach an unacceptable magnitude for the structure of the thrusters or the entire steering arrangement. As discussed above the prior art hydraulic steering arrangements have safety valves aiming at taking care of the oil flows and pressures related to hydrodynamic loading with a limited safety margin only.
However, the prior art safety valves have not been designed and positioned in view of the sudden loads created by hard and large solid objects like for instance ice. The loads associated with contact with ice have a profound dynamic character. A typical aspect is that these loads can lead in a very short time to a torque load on the steering system above a value the construction can accommodate. Also if the vessel containing the thruster is sailing at a certain speed at the moment the thruster comes in contact with ice the speed at which the ice block (or other large solid object) tries to rotate the thruster is easily 5 to 10 times the normal steering speed. The forced rotation of the thruster results in the hydraulic motors acting as pumps and generating a flow significantly larger, also 5 to 10 times, than the one required for steering purposes. The prior art safety valves have been selected to accommodate a flow corresponding to the normal steering speed upon blockage of the steering system. The same is true for the dimensioning of the oil pipes between the hydraulic motors and the safety valve. Also the positioning of the valves arranged at, possibly, a considerable distance from the steering motor/s has been based on the requirements associated with the steering purposes. In other words, the main design parameter has been the requirement of the steering of the thruster that its speed of rotation is of the order of 2 rpm whereby the oil pipes to and from the steering motor/s should be able to handle such flows. On the one hand, when the hydraulic steering system is subjected to the significantly increased flows as generated by the hydraulic motors the limited diameter of the piping results in high flow velocities within the pipes, whereby the oil friction in the pipes creates a substantial pressure loss within the entire hydraulic pipeline between the hydraulic motor and the safety valve. The maximum pressure within the steering system is limited by the maximum mechanical strength of the steering system or thruster with respect to the torque load. A higher load leads to damage of the steering system or the thruster. Given the maximum allowable torque or pressure on the steering system, the pressure loss within the piping would require a lower setting of the safety valve. In other words, the higher rotational speeds of the thruster are desired to be taken into account, the lower the opening pressure of the safety valve should be. The lowering of the opening pressure of the safety valve would however interfere with the normal steering operation. In a similar manner the quick rotation of the hydraulic motor/s as pump/s creates in the inlet port of the steering motor/s reduced pressure, which easily leads to non-controlled cavitation, as the pipes leading to the inlet port/s of the hydraulic motor/s do not allow oil to flow quickly enough into the motor/s.
On the other hand, if the hydraulic pipes and safety valve are sized with respect to the maximal imaginable flow, and the distance between the hydraulic motor/s and the counterbalance block, where the pressure relief valve is positioned, is several meters, then the hydraulic pipelines are relative larger volumes. Those volumes may introduce undesired dynamic behavior such as pressure pulses and time delays. Especially in case of large external loads, which appear as impact loads, the undesired dynamic phenomena may occur. Pressure pulses are highly undesired as they can cause chattering of the pressure relief valve, i.e. the valve opens and closes in very short time periods. This may result in damage for the pressure relief valve and hydraulic motor. Also, for normal steering operations, pressure pulses and time delay may influence the steering behavior in a negative way such that the steering movement is non-smo.
A first object of the present invention is to offer a solution to one or more of the above discussed problems.
A second object of the present invention is to suggest an improvement in the hydraulic steering arrangement of a thruster. The main part of the hydraulic system remains unchanged (or can even be made smaller or simplified), which means the dynamic behavior for normal steering remains the same. The position of the pressure relief valve is as close to hydraulic motor as possible such that high pressure introduced by large loads is relieved as soon as possible, which is a good measure to prevent the origination of pressure waves.
A third object of the present invention is to provide the hydraulic steering arrangement of a thruster with safety valve/s located as close to the hydraulic motor/s as practically possible.
A fourth object of the present invention is to provide the hydraulic steering arrangement of a thruster with a combination of a counter balance valve block and a set of cross-over safety valves arranged close to the hydraulic steering motor.
A fifth object of the present invention is to dimension the cross-over safety valves to allow a high rotation speed of the steering units while maintaining system pressure within acceptable limits.
A sixth object of the present invention is to provide the hydraulic steering arrangement of a thrusters with steering motors, which may be operated as a brake during an overload of the steering arrangement.
At least one of the above and other objects of the invention are met by a hydraulic steering arrangement for a thruster of a marine vessel, the steering arrangement comprising a hydraulic oil tank, at least one hydraulic pump, a control valve block, a counterbalance block, at least one hydraulic motor having two ports for the hydraulic oil the at least one hydraulic motor being used for steering the thruster, wherein a cross-over safety block is arranged in close communication with the at least one hydraulic motor.
Other characteristic features of the present will become apparent from the appended dependent claims.
The present invention, when solving at least one of the above-mentioned problems, improves the operability and reliability of marine vessels especially in arctic waters where ice may be present. The cross-over safety block makes sure that the thrusters start rotating before the torque acting on the steering arrangement becomes unacceptable. An important aspect is that the pressure increase created by the ice in the hydraulic steering arrangement is minimized by arranging the cross-over safety block as close to the hydraulic steering motor/s as possible. A further advantage is that the modifications made in the hydraulic system are limited. The benefit of this is that the dynamic properties of the system for normal operation remain more or less unaffected.
In the following, the hydraulic steering arrangement of a thruster is explained in more detail with reference to the accompanying Figures, of which
The control block 20 of the thruster 1 comprises a proportional directional valve 22 (4 ports, 3 positions) Depending on the flows and pressures applied the operation of the valve may be performed with pilot operated valves. The hydraulic steering arrangement has at least one hydraulic pump 26 for pressurizing the oil stored in the hydraulic oil tank 28. Normally the number of hydraulic pumps 26 is at least two, for instance for safety and redundancy purposes. In such a case, one pump may be capable of fulfilling the need of oil of all the consumers, or both pumps may be used simultaneously. In non-steering conditions the proportional valve (and the optional pilot valves) is in neutral position blocking oil flow through the valves, whereby the oil pressure created by the pump/s 26 acts on the valves only. When the direction of the thruster 1 needs to be changed the proportional valve is moved to the desired direction. Now a flow communication from the pump/s 26 towards the steering motor 8 is opened resulting in rotation of the steering motor 8 and turning of the thruster 1. The oil flow returning from the steering motor 8 flows through the proportional directional valve 22 back to the oil tank 28. When the desired azimuth angle of the thruster 1 is reached the proportional directional valve 22 is then returned to its neutral position. As a result it is blocking the oil flow from the pump/s 26 to the steering motor 8. This function locks the steering angle of the thruster (assuming negligible leakage from the hydraulic motor).
The safety and counterbalance block 30 includes a safety valve arrangement 32 and two, i.e. a first and a second, counterbalance valve arrangements 40′ and 40″. The purpose of the safety valve arrangement 32 is to open a flow path from one port of the hydraulic steering motor 8 to the other port thereof in such a case that the motor 8, for some reason, starts acting as a pump and raises pressure in one of its ports. The safety valve arrangement 32 is formed of four check valves 34′, 34″ and 36′, 36″ and a safety or pressure relief valve 38. When the motor 8 acts as a pump and creates an oil pressure exceeding the predetermined opening pressure of the safety valve 38 one of the first two check valves 34′ and 34″ i.e. one of the two check valves 34′ and 34″ (depending in which direction the motor is rotated) in the flow paths between the hydraulic motor 8 and the safety valve 38 opens and as a result, the oil flows through the safety valve 38, passes one of the second check valves 36′ and 36″ and enters the pipe of the hydraulic motor 8 prevailing at a lower pressure, i.e. the one acting as the inlet pipe of the hydraulic motor.
The first and second counterbalance valve arrangement 40′ and 40″ have been coupled farther away than the safety valve arrangement 38 to the hydraulic pipes 50 and 52 connected to the ports of the hydraulic steering motor 8. The first counterbalance valve arrangement 40′ includes a check valve 42 and a pilot-operated pressure relief valve 44 and the second counterbalance valve arrangement 40″ includes a check valve 46 and a pilot-operated pressure relief valve 48. The purpose of the counterbalance valve arrangements 40′ and 40″ is to lock the steering i.e. maintain the thruster 1 in the direction it has been turned by the hydraulic steering motor/s 8 controlled by the proportional directional valve 22. In other words, the counterbalance valve arrangements 40′ and 40″ take the pressure load, if the hydraulic motor 8 starts to act as a pump, whereby the proportional directional valve 22 is not subjected to any pressure load from the direction of the hydraulic motor 8.
At a steering phase the counterbalance valve arrangements 40′ and 40″ function as follows assuming that a first pipe portion 50′ and a second pipe portion 50″, allows oil flow to the motor and pipe 52 takes care of the return flow. The first valve arrangement 40′ positioned at the inlet pipe 50 of the steering motor/s 8 allows the pressurized oil to flow via the check valve 42 to the inlet port/s of the steering motor/s 8 with a minimal pressure loss. In the second valve arrangement 40″ the pressure of the returning oil at the first outlet pipe portion 52′ of the steering motor/s 8 affects the pilot-operated pressure relief valve 48 and opens it, assisted by the pilot pressure from the pressure pipe 50″ between the proportional directional valve 22 and the pilot-operated pressure relief valve 44. Thus the returning oil has a certain counterpressure, i.e. a pressure loss takes place in the second counterbalance valve arrangement 40″.
When the desired thruster direction, i.e. angular position is reached, and the steering action thus ceased the thruster is maintained at its desired direction. As explained already above, the proportional directional valve 22 is moved to its neutral position whereby no flow through the proportional valve 22 takes place from the supply side to the hydraulic motor side. However, due to the presence of the counterbalance valve arrangements it is not the proportional directional valve 22 that prevents the steering motor from rotating, as is the case in the steering arrangement of the above cited Japanese reference, but the counterbalance valve arrangements 40′ and 40″. In this case the steering motor/s 8 is/are subjected to no internal load. However, the thruster 1 may be subjected to external loads from the sea or any objects therein, whereby the thruster 1 acts on the steering motor/s 8 through the steering gear transmission (discussed in connection with
In
The hydraulic powerpack 60, thus, contains hydraulic pumps 26, an oil tank 28, and the control block (discussed in connection with
The counterbalance block 70 contains the counterbalance valves, i.e. the pilot-operated pressure relief valves 44 and 48, the check valves 42 and 46 in cooperation therewith, the pressure relief valve, i.e. the safety valve 38 with its check valves (34′, 34″, 36′ and 36″) and the cavitation protection system 76 utilizing check valve 36′ or check valve 36″.
The counterbalance block 70 has three functions. The main function is accomplished by the counterbalance valves, i.e. the pilot-operated pressure relief valves 44 and 48 and the check valves 42 and 46 in cooperation therewith. For instance, a path to the hydraulic motor/s 8 is arranged via a check valve 42 i.e. with a low pressure drop. However, the return path back to the proportional directional valve 22 is arranged via a pilot-operated pressure relief valve 48, i.e. with a large pressure drop. In fact, the counterbalance block 70 shown in
Another function of the counterbalance block 70 is the pressure relief in case of too high pressure prevailing in one of the pipe portions 50′ or 52′ coming from the steering motor 8. A certain pressure makes the pressure relief valve, i.e. the safety valve 38 open so that oil may flow to the oil tank 28 or to the other pipe portion 52′ or 50′.
The third main part is the hydraulic steering motor 8, which is connected to the gear transmission and mounted on the support frame (as shown in
The hydraulic powerpack 60 and the counterbalance block 70 are sized to handle the flow corresponding to a desired thruster steering speed of around 2 rpm (hydraulic motors 8 will naturally rotate faster because of the steering gear transmission). Since the thruster steering speed may be imposed by an ice block or some other solid object and this speed may be much higher than the design steering speed, the steering arrangement of the present invention has been provided with a cross-over safety block 80. The safety block 80 comprises pressure relief valves 82 and 84, which are preferably arranged as close to the steering motor 8 as practically possible. In other words, the cross-over safety block 80 is preferably attached to the hydraulic motor 8. In case one safety block 80 is coupled to several hydraulic motors the safety block is preferably arranged so that the cross-over oil passage lengths between the motors and the block are minimized. The pressure relief valves 82 and 84 are sized to handle a much larger flow than the corresponding pressure relief valves 38, 44 and 48 in the counterbalance block 70. The main reason for this kind of sizing is the goal to keep the hydraulic oil pressure at an acceptable level in the entire hydraulic arrangement, and to prevent pressure pulses and their negative effects in the hydraulic steering arrangement.
The cross-over safety block 80 comprises further two cross-over oil passage 54 and 56, which are connected at their one ends to the ports of the hydraulic motor 8 and at their opposite ends to the pressure relief valves 82 and 84. The cross-over oil passage 54 and 56 have a diameter allowing high volumetric flows from the hydraulic motor 8 to the pressure relief valves 82 and 84 and from these valves back to the motor 8. The dimensioning of the cross-over oil passage 54 and 56 is to be based on a significant higher flow capacity, 5- to 10-fold compared to the hydraulic pipe portions 50′ and 52′ branching from the cross-over oil passage 54 and 56 and connecting the cross-over safety block 80 to the counterbalance block 70. Thus the hydraulic pipe portions 50′ and 52′ may be dimensioned as in prior art hydraulic steering arrangements. The higher flow capacity of the cross-over oil passage 54 and 56 ensure that the pressure in said cross-over oil passage is maintained within acceptable limits.
The cross-over safety block 80 functions as follows: Once the hydraulic steering arrangement, normally due to ice or some other solid object tending to turn the thruster 1, is subjected to an unacceptable load whereby the hydraulic steering motors 8 are driven and rotated by the load, i.e. the hydraulic steering motors 8 start operating as pumps, one of the cross-over safety valves, for instance pressure relief valve 82, opens. Thus, the flow generated by the hydraulic steering motors 8 goes through one of the cross-over safety valves 82 and 84. The obtainable steering speeds, when the hydraulic motors 8 are driven mechanically, i.e. by the thruster 1, are easily higher than the steering speeds, which are normally imposed by the hydraulic motors 8. It has been estimated that such a speed may easily be 5-fold, and sometimes even 10-fold compared to ordinary steering speed. Thus both the pressure relief valves 82 and 84 as well as the cross-over oil passage 54 and 56 of the cross-over safety block 80 are dimensioned to 5-fold, preferably to 10-fold volumetric flows compared to pipes 50′ and 52′ leading from the cross-over safety block 80 to the counterbalance block 70, for instance.
The safety valve 38 in the counterbalance valve block 70 is optional. The flow capacity required during ice contact of the complete hydraulic system is increased by adding the valve. The setting of the valves should be slightly higher than that of the cross over safety valves 82 and 84 on the steering motors. The sizing of the cross-over safety valves i.e. the pressure relief valves 82 and 84 close to the hydraulic motors 8 and the optional safety valve 38 in the counterbalance block is made in such a way that the pressure increase within the hydraulic steering arrangement is restricted to a limited value.
Given the pressure settings on the pressure relief valves 82 and 84 the hydraulic motors 8 need to generate a significant pressure to be able to open one of the valves and thus to enable the oil flow through the valve. A beneficial result is that the hydraulic motors 8 need to be rotated by a significant load moment to enable the rotation. The hydraulic motors still generate a torque opposing the external ice load. The hydraulic motors 8 act, thus, as brakes. As a consequence the azimuth rotation speed of the arrangement is, to a certain degree, limited.
In
In
In
In
It should be understood that the above is only an exemplary description of a novel and inventive hydraulic steering arrangement of a thruster and a method of arrangement. It should be understood that the above description discusses only a few preferred embodiments of the present invention without any purpose to limit the invention to the discussed embodiments and their details only. Thus the above specification should not be understood as limiting the invention by any means but the entire scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims only. From the above description it should be understood that separate features of the invention may be used in connection with other separate features even if such a combination has not been specifically shown in the description or in the drawings.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2011/050773 | 9/9/2011 | WO | 00 | 5/29/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/034797 | 3/14/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4522109 | Marchi | Jun 1985 | A |
4878864 | Van Bentem | Nov 1989 | A |
5018935 | Gage | May 1991 | A |
5183071 | Ogawa | Feb 1993 | A |
6938719 | Ishimaru | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20060278152 | Nickerson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
52077397 | Jun 1977 | JP |
738944 | May 1980 | SU |
Entry |
---|
Decision on Grant dated Apr. 13, 2015 from corresponding Russian application No. 2014113854/11(021666), filed Sep. 9, 2011. |
International Search Report for PCT/FI2011/050773 dated Apr. 4, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140299030 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |