1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of piston engines.
2. Prior Art
Historically, piston engines have used mechanically actuated poppet type intake and exhaust valves operated by way of an engine driven camshaft. While such systems are in a high state of development and usually provide reliable performance for the life of the engine, they have the disadvantage of providing a fixed relationship between crankshaft angle and valve position. Accordingly, the timing for valve opening and closing, the valve lift obtained, etc., are predetermined and fixed throughout the operating range of the engine, thus providing a substantial engine performance compromise under most engine operating conditions.
More recently, considerable work has been done in the development of alternate engine valve actuation systems, generally with a goal of allowing the varying of valve opening and closing crankshaft angle with varying engine operating conditions, and in some cases, of varying the valve lift based on engine operating conditions. One such alternate actuation system comprises hydraulic valve actuation using a spring return, a hydraulic return, or a combination of both. Generally, such valve actuation systems use either a single stage or a two-stage electrically controlled valving system for operation of the hydraulic actuator, the valving system being operative between three states, the first coupling the hydraulic actuator to a source of hydraulic fluid under pressure, the second blocking hydraulic fluid communication to or from the hydraulic engine valve actuator, and the third coupling the hydraulic engine valve actuator to a low pressure drain or vent. Thus engine valve lift may be controlled by controlling the timing between initiating valve opening by coupling the hydraulic engine valve actuator to the source of fluid under pressure and the blocking of the flow of hydraulic fluid to or from the hydraulic engine valve actuator. This, in theory, provides the desired result, though in practice may not provide the accuracy and uniformity in valve lift desired for smooth engine operation under all conditions.
Systems are also known for controlling the valving based on actual measurement of valve position. This has certain advantages, but also adds to the complexity of the system.
One aspect of the present invention is an engine valve hydraulic actuation system allowing a selection of valve lifts, each being determined by a fixed stop, thereby providing excellent repeatability in valve lift. Another aspect of the present invention provides hydraulic deceleration or braking of engine valve velocity, not only on engine valve closure but also at attainment of higher lift or lifts. Thus, by way of example, in a diesel engine while idling or when running at low load and low rpm, the intake valve or valves, or intake and exhaust valves, may be operated with the lower lift, thereby providing adequate aspiration while at the same time reducing the hydraulic energy used for engine valve actuation. By way of another example, in engines having multiple intake valves such as two per cylinder, one intake valve might be opened to a high lift and the other intake valve opened to a low lift to increase turbulence within the combustion chamber for better mixing of the fuel and air charge. In the embodiments to be described herein, systems for the choice of two engine valve lifts are described, though the concept is readily extendable to more than two engine valve lifts, if desired. The hydraulic fluid used may be engine oil, fuel or some third fluid, as desired.
One embodiment of the present invention is shown schematically in
Hydraulic pressure is provided for the system of this embodiment by a positive displacement pump 42, pumping through a kidney or manifold arrangement 44 and through a check valve 46 to a high pressure rail 48, which may be a fixed pressure rail, or a variable pressure high pressure rail. Pressure in the high pressure rail 48 is controlled by a bypass valve 50, electrically controlled by an actuator 52 to couple the output of the positive displacement pump 42 back to the input of the pump as required to balance pump output with hydraulic system usage.
Pressure over piston 40 is controlled in this embodiment by three-way valve 54, actuated by one or more actuators 56. Valve 54 controllably couples pressure from the high pressure rail 48 through restriction 58 to the region over piston 40, or alternatively, couples the region over piston 40 through restriction 58 to vent 60. In one preferred embodiment, valve 54 is a three-way spool valve using an integral single coil, spring return actuator. However, other types of actuators, such as dual coil magnetic latching actuators, etc., as well as other types of valve, such as poppet valves may be used. In that regard, two two-way valves could be used in place of the single three-way valve 54 if desired.
An identical or similar valve 62 is used to control pressure over piston 38, the valve being controlled by an actuator or actuators 64. In this embodiment valve 62, when coupling hydraulic fluid from the high pressure rail 48 to the region over piston 38, couples that high pressure hydraulic fluid through restriction 66 and check valve 68.
The system operates as follows. With no pressure in the system, return spring 24 assures that the valve 20 (all valves in the engine) are closed. As pressure builds in the high pressure rail 48, the closing force of the return spring 24 is aided by the coupling of the pressure in the high pressure rail to the region below pins 70, which also encourage member 28, and thus valve 20, upward to the closed position. Pressure from the high pressure rail is provided under pins 70 through a restriction 72 and a check valve 74. When the valve 20 is to be opened to the first, lower lift, valve 54 is actuated to couple pressure in the high pressure rail 48 through restriction 58 to the region over piston 40. Restriction 58 provides some restriction on the valve opening velocity, though since the valve lift itself is substantially restricted, sufficiently short engine valve opening times are still achieved for all engine operating conditions. Then when the engine valve 20 is to be closed, valve 54 is switched back to the position shown, venting the region above piston 40 through restriction 58 to the vent or drain 60. Restriction 58 again restricts the engine valve closing velocity, and particularly the landing velocity, yet because of the limited lift used for this first lift position, adequately fast engine valve closing times are achieved for all engine operating conditions. Preferably the vent or drain 60 is at an adequate pressure to assure backfilling of any increasing volumes in the system with hydraulic fluid during operation of the system.
When the engine valve is to be opened to the greater lift position, valve 62 may be operated to couple the region over piston 38 to the high pressure rail 48 through restriction 66 and check valve 68, which opens to allow free flow of the high pressure fluid to the region over piston 38. As the engine valve moves downward, so do member 28 and pins 70, which are substantially smaller in total cross-sectional area than piston 38 or 40. Accordingly, the high pressure fluid under pins 70 is initially returned to the high pressure rail through line 76. However, as the lower ends of pins 70 pass the opening for line 76, the pins close off that opening so that the pressure below pins 70 rises above that of the high pressure rail. This closes check valve 74, with the further flow of hydraulic fluid through restriction 72 providing a dashpot type action to slow the engine valve opening to a soft landing, in the embodiment shown as limited by the total stroke of pins 70. The pins 70 could provide a hard or fixed stop associated with the actuator providing the second or larger lift. In a preferred embodiment to be described, a different hard stop is provided just before the pins 70 reach their lowermost limit.
Now when the engine valve 20 is to be closed from the higher lift position, valve 62 is moved to the position shown to couple the region over piston 38 to the low pressure drain or vent 60. Now high pressure fluid from the high pressure rail will be provided through now open check valve 74 and soon also through line 76, with the combination of pins 70 and return spring 74 accelerating the engine valve toward the engine valve closed position. As the engine valve starts to close, the region above piston 38 is vented through line 78, as well as restriction 66, to vent or drain 60. However, as piston 38 moves above the port to line 78, flow through that line is blocked, with pressure above piston 38 rising above the vent or drain pressure, closing check valve 68 to allow flow now only through restriction 66, thereby also providing a form of dashpot effective on final closing of the engine valve 20. Thus in this embodiment, one may select either of two engine valve lifts, and for the greater engine valve lift, unidirectional dashpot type damping is provided not only as the engine valve approaches the closed position, but also as the engine valve approaches the fixed or hard stop open position, the dashpots not limiting acceleration of the engine valve either from the closed position toward the open position, or from the fully open position toward the closed position.
Another embodiment of the present invention is shown in
In the embodiments heretofore disclosed, two independent pistons are shown schematically, one on top of the other, one piston having a limited stroke with the stroke of the second piston being limited by the allowable stroke of the engine valve hydraulic return pins 70. While such a series arrangement of actuator pistons could be used, a more attractive packaging of a dual piston arrangement is by way of concentric or parallel pistons. Such an arrangement is shown in
When the engine valve is to be closed, the respective actuator couples port 102 to the vent or drain. Now the upward motion of member 98 and the resulting flow forces cause ball 104 to seat as shown in
Now referring again to
In a preferred embodiment, the system is operated by either pressurizing the region over annular piston 96 and plug 92 for the shorter lift, or both the region over annular piston 96 and plug 92 and the region over member 98 for the larger lift, but not just the region over member 98 alone. While this is not a limitation of the invention, it provides better performance of a specific embodiment, and has the advantage of always providing a rapid engine valve opening by always providing the maximum initial engine valve opening force.
Now referring to
An overall system generally in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention may be seen in
It should be noted that many engines have multiple exhaust valves or multiple intake and exhaust valves. In such cases, separate hydraulic control valves and actuators may be used for each valve of each cylinder to provide independent selection of lift for each valve, or the same control valves may be used to control all hydraulic engine valve actuators for all valves of the same type (intake or exhaust) for a particular cylinder. As a still further alternative, all valves of the same type may be mechanically coupled so that a single set of control valves may be used to control a single set of hydraulic engine valve actuators to control all valves of the same type for a particular cylinder. These and other variations and combinations of these and other variations will be obvious to those skilled in the art.
In the previously described embodiments, two specific engine valve lifts could be selectively achieved, each being defined by a hard stop, with at least the greater lift having a dashpot type damping or deceleration of the engine valve, both upon approaching the maximum lift position and upon approaching the closed position, the dashpots being unidirectional dashpots allowing rapid engine valve movement away from either the engine valve closed position or the maximum lift position of the engine valve. However the aspect of the invention providing this dashpot damping is also applicable to hydraulic engine valve actuation systems having a single hard stop defined lift, such as by way of example, systems using a pair of pistons for initial engine valve opening, after which a single drive piston continues to move the engine valve to its full lift position. The dashpot damping at the full lift position may be provided in such systems, by way of example, using the structure of
To open the engine valve, the high pressure rail is coupled to ports 144. This couples the high pressure through ports 150 in the annular boost piston 138 and openings 152 in the drive piston 142, forcing ball 146 off the seat to allow free flow of the high pressure hydraulic fluid to the region above a drive piston 142 and the annular boost piston 138, forcing the combination of the two pistons downward to initiate opening of the engine valve. After initial downward movement of the boost piston 138, land 158 of the boost piston moves downward to also allow flow around the upper part of the boost piston. When flange 154 on the lower end of the annular boost piston 138 hits stop 156, the annular boost piston stops moving, though the drive piston 142 continues its downward motion to open the engine valve to its full lift open position, an assembly such as that of
For valve closure, ports 144 are coupled to a vent or drain. Now the drive piston 142 is forced upward by the combined forces of the engine valve return spring and the hydraulic return on the engine valve through pins 70 (
An overall system generally in accordance with the single lift embodiment hereinbefore described with respect to
While certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed and described herein for purposes of illustration and not for purposes of limitation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/553,325 filed Mar. 15, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3209737 | Omotehara et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
4821689 | Tittizer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5048489 | Fischer et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5241935 | Beck et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5463987 | Cukovich | Nov 1995 | A |
5598871 | Sturman et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5638781 | Sturman | Jun 1997 | A |
5640987 | Sturman | Jun 1997 | A |
5713315 | Jyoutaki et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713316 | Sturman | Feb 1998 | A |
5829396 | Sturman | Nov 1998 | A |
5960753 | Sturman | Oct 1999 | A |
5970956 | Sturman | Oct 1999 | A |
6109284 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6148778 | Sturman | Nov 2000 | A |
6173685 | Sturman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6308690 | Sturman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6340009 | Boecking | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360728 | Sturman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374784 | Tischer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6415749 | Sturman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6505584 | Lou | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6557506 | Sturman | May 2003 | B2 |
6575126 | Sturman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584885 | Lou | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6668773 | Holtman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6739293 | Turner et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6886511 | Tong et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO - 0246582 | Jun 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050211201 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60553325 | Mar 2004 | US |