The present invention relates generally to the field of linkage control systems, and more particularly to stabilizers for vehicle suspension systems. In the present invention, hydraulic assemblies are coupled to a plurality of movable suspension members to control movement between the movable suspension members.
All vehicles generally have some sort of suspension system to control movement of the vehicle during maneuvering, traveling through various terrains, loading the vehicle, and various other situations. Most vehicles have a combination of linkages, shock absorbers (e.g., air, gas, hydraulic, mechanical or spring, etc.), and stabilizer members arranged in a standard suspension architeture. In general, the linkages facilitate movement of the wheels relative to the vehicle, the shock absorbers provide cushioning between the linkages and the vehicle, while the stabilizer members are provided to distribute a load between the various linkages for balancing the vehicle.
The stabilizer members play an important role in balancing the vehicle during maneuvering and various load situations. For example, stabilizer members may be coupled between front and rear suspension assemblies to balance the vehicle during acceleration and deceleration. Stabilizer members also may be coupled between left and right suspension assemblies to balance the vehicle during maneuvering, such as left and right turns. The stabilizer members typically embody metallic bars and other members, which generally extend straight across from one suspension member to another. Accordingly, a pathway must exist between the desired suspension members for these stabilizer members to be installed in the vehicle. This configuration spatially constrains the positioning of other components of the vehicle, such as the engine and transmission. Installation of the stabilizer members is also complicated due to dimensional variations between vehicles and the suspension members. For example, a particular line of vehicles may have tolerances in various components that cause an overall dimensional variation in the distance between the suspension members.
There is a need, therefore, for an improved stabilizer system. There is a particular need for a stabilizer assembly that does not require a straight pathway between the suspension members and is relatively less sensitive to dimensional variations in the vehicle.
The present technique provides a stabilizer system comprising a plurality of piston cylinder assemblies, which have multiple interconnected chambers to provide cross compensation between suspension members coupled to those piston cylinder assemblies. The piston cylinder assemblies may have two or more chambers separated by pistons, which move in response to a load imposed on the suspension member coupled to that piston cylinder assembly. As the piston moves in response to movement of the corresponding suspension member, a fluid pressure is transmitted to another suspension member to distribute the load between the two suspension members. For example, the present technique may balance a load caused by maneuvering the vehicle between left and right suspension members or it may balance load caused by acceleration or deceleration between front and rear suspension members. Accordingly, the present technique is applicable to any vehicle having movable suspension members, including all sorts of automotive vehicles, motorcycles, bicycles, agricultural vehicles, public transportation vehicles, and any other suitable application.
In one aspect, the present technique provides a stabilizer system for a suspension system. The system comprises first and second piston-cylinder assemblies each comprising a set of variable chambers. The system also includes first and second conduits, each coupled to a desired chamber from each set of variable chambers. The first and second piston-cylinder assemblies are configured for coupling to, and load distribution between, first and second movable suspension members.
In another aspect, the present technique provides a vehicle suspension stabilizer, which comprises a plurality of piston-cylinder assemblies having variable chambers and linkage members configured for coupling to movable suspension members. In this vehicle suspension stabilizer, multiple sets of the variable chambers are fluidly coupled to distribute forces between the movable suspension members.
In another aspect, the present technique provides a method for stabilizing a suspension system. The method comprises mechanically coupling a plurality of pistoncylinder assemblies to a plurality of movable suspension members. The method further comprises fluidly intercoupling chambers from the plurality of piston-cylinder assemblies.
In another aspect, the present technique provides a method for stabilizing a vehicle. The method comprises hydraulically balancing orientations of a plurality of suspension members in response to a load exerted on a first member of the plurality of suspension members.
In another aspect, the present technique provides a method of forming a suspension stabilizer for a vehicle. The method comprises providing a piston-cylinder assembly having multiple chambers disposed about a piston assembly. The method further comprises intercoupling chambers of a plurality of the piston-cylinder assemblies to provide crosswise stabilization between vehicle suspension members connectable to the plurality of pistoncylinder assemblies.
The foregoing and other advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
Turning now to the drawings and referring first to
As illustrated in the front and top views of
In this exemplary embodiment of the stabilizer assembly 22, piston assemblies 32 & 34 are disposed centrally within the stabilizers 24 and 26 to form chambers 36 & 38 and 40 & 42, respectively. The piston assemblies 32 & 34 are then movably coupled to the suspension arms 18 via linkages 44 and 46, which are rotatably coupled to torque arms 48 and 50 at joints 52 and 54, respectively. The torque arms 48 and 50 are coupled to the suspension arms 18 at a desired angle (e.g., 90 degrees) to facilitate interaction between the suspension arms 18 and the stabilizers 24 and 26. The stabilizers 24 and 26 are also coupled to a central frame structure 56 via joints 58 and 60, respectively. Accordingly, the piston assemblies 32 & 34 of the stabilizers 24 and 26 are configured for movable interaction with the suspension arms 18.
The stabilizer assembly 22 operates to stabilize motion and distribute a load applied to the suspension arms 18 by flowing fluid between chambers of the stabilizers 24 and 26. Accordingly, the chambers 36 & 40 and 38 & 42 are intercoupled via the connectors 28 and 30, which may embody liquid, pneumatic, or other fluid conduits, as discussed above. The stabilizer assembly 22 also may have a variety of sensors for monitoring and controlling the stabilizers 22 and 26. For example, sensors 62 and 64 may be coupled to the connectors 28 and 30 for monitoring pressure. These sensors 62 and 64 also can be coupled to a control unit, such as a control unit for the vehicle 10 or for the stabilizer assembly 22.
As illustrated in
For example, the left suspension arm 18 may be forced to rotate upwardly, causing the piston assembly 32 to move rightwardly through the stabilizer 24. This rightward movement of the piston assembly 32 expands the chamber 36 and creates a vacuum, which draws fluid from the chamber 40 through the connector 28 and induces the piston assembly 34 to move leftwardly through the stabilizer 26. Accordingly, the leftward movement of the piston assembly 34 forces the right suspension arm 18 to rotate upwardly about the pivot joint 72. The rightward movement of the piston assembly 32 also contracts the chamber 38, thereby forcing fluid to flow through the connector 30 to the chamber 42 of the stabilizer 26. This fluid flow induces the piston assembly 34 to move leftwardly through the stabilizer 26. Again, this leftward movement of the piston assembly 34 forces the right suspension arm 18 to rotate upwardly about the pivot joint 72. Accordingly, as described above, the stabilizer assembly 22 distributes the motion or load on the left suspension arm 18 between the left and right suspension arms 18 to provide a desired balance and stabilization between the left and right suspension arms 18.
As mentioned above, the suspension arms 18, the torque arms 48 and 50, the linkages 44 and 46, and the stabilizers 24 and 26 may embody a variety of the configurations. As illustrated in
An alternate embodiment of the suspension arms 18 and the stabilizer assembly 22 is illustrated by the front and top views of
The stabilizers 24 and 26 also may be coupled directly to the suspension arms 18, as illustrated in FIG. 5. In this alternate embodiment, the stabilizers 24 and 26 are coupled to the suspension arms 18 and the vehicle body 12 at joints 82 and 84, respectively. The operation of the stabilizer assembly 22 is similar to that described above with reference to
The stabilizers 24 and 26 also may be coupled to upper and lower portions of the frame 14, as illustrated in FIG. 6. In this alternate embodiment, the stabilizers 24 and 26 are coupled to upper and lower mount structures 86 and 88 at joints 90 and 92, respectively. Additionally, the chambers 36 and 40 are intercoupled via the connector 30, while the chambers 38 and 42 are intercoupled via the connector 28. The operation of the stabilizer assembly 22 is similar to that described above with reference to
The stabilizer assembly 22 also may have multiple stabilizers coupled to each of the suspension arms 18, as illustrated in
In these alternate embodiments, only one chamber from each of the stabilizers 94-100 is intercoupled with a chamber from another one of the stabilizers 94-100. As illustrated, the stabilizers 94, 96, 98 and 100 include outer chambers 150, 152, 154 and 158, which are defined by the piston assemblies 102, 104, 106 and 108 opposite the piston linkages 110, 112, 114 and 116, respectively. In this quad-stabilizer configuration, the outer chamber 154 is coupled to the outer chamber 152 via the connector 28, while the outer chamber 150 is coupled to the outer chamber 156 via the connector 30.
As noted above, the embodiments of
The alternate embodiments illustrated in
As mentioned above, the present technique may utilize various volume and pressure compensators to accommodate volume differentials between intercoupled chambers and to provide additional stabilization between the stabilizers 24 and 26. Although the stabilizers 24 and 26 may simply embody dual chamber enclosures having a single piston assembly, the stabilizer assembly 22 may incorporate relief valves, pressure regulators, volume expansion/contraction chambers, diaphragms, overflow chambers, spring assemblies, and various other mechanisms to control volume and pressure differentials. The embodiment of
In the embodiment of
Operation of the stabilizer assembly 22 of
The rightward movement of the piston assembly 32 also contracts the chamber 38, thereby forcing fluid to flow through the connector 30 to the chamber 42 of the stabilizer 26. This fluid flow induces the piston assembly 34 to move leftwardly through the stabilizer 26, thereby forcing the right suspension arm 18 to rotate upwardly about the pivot joint 72. Again, the volumes of chambers 38 and 42 are not equal, because chamber 42 is partially consumed by the linkage 46. Accordingly, one or both of the piston assemblies 32 and 34 may operate to accommodate the volume differential between the chambers 38 and 42. In this scenario, the piston member 174 may contract inwardly in the central chamber 178 to accommodate the larger volume being transferred from the chamber 38 to the chamber 42. However, as the stabilizer assembly 22 transfers fluids simultaneously between the chambers 36 & 40 and 38 & 42, forces are exerted on both ends of the piston assemblies 32 and 34 due to the volume differentials between those respective chambers. Accordingly, these volume differentials may at least partially cooperate to facilitate the desired movement of the linkages 44 and 46, while the piston assemblies 32 and 34 may accommodate any remaining pressure differentials, volume differentials, or time response lags between the linkages 44 and 46. Again, as described above, the stabilizer assembly 22 distributes the motion or load exerted on one or both of the suspension arms 18 between the suspension arms 18 to provide a desired balance and stabilization between the suspension arms 18. During this balancing or stabilizing process, the piston assemblies 32 and 34 maintain a pressure or volume balance within the stabilizer assembly 22.
The embodiment illustrated in
The embodiment illustrated in
The embodiment illustrated in
While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1914814 | Mercier | Jun 1933 | A |
2869892 | Sahagian | Jan 1959 | A |
3399905 | Vogel | Sep 1968 | A |
3625321 | Lutz | Dec 1971 | A |
RE27623 | Millican | Apr 1973 | E |
3736000 | Capgras | May 1973 | A |
4270771 | Fujii | Jun 1981 | A |
4606551 | Toti et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4607861 | Eisenberg et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
5058868 | Sirven | Oct 1991 | A |
5066041 | Kindermann et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5087073 | Lund | Feb 1992 | A |
5174603 | Lund | Dec 1992 | A |
5447332 | Heyring | Sep 1995 | A |
5484218 | Fellows | Jan 1996 | A |
5489161 | Sugita et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5492427 | Ersoy et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5492428 | Hellon et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5498092 | Fellows | Mar 1996 | A |
5551722 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5568930 | Urbach | Oct 1996 | A |
5601305 | Nordloh et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609433 | Pazdirek et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611635 | Schütt et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615967 | Hellon | Apr 1997 | A |
5653545 | Moormann et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5672023 | Lieber et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5678947 | Urbach et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5713689 | Pazdirek et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5732969 | Spoto | Mar 1998 | A |
5752780 | Dorr | May 1998 | A |
5755526 | Stanevich | May 1998 | A |
5782573 | Dorr et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782574 | Henkel | Jul 1998 | A |
5794966 | MacLeod | Aug 1998 | A |
5813698 | Spoto et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813789 | Prickler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823306 | de Molina | Oct 1998 | A |
5836606 | Spoto et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851082 | Schmudde et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860757 | Sugiura | Jan 1999 | A |
5876149 | Dorr et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882137 | Epp et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5927891 | Trumbower et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931597 | Urbach | Aug 1999 | A |
5954353 | Kincaid et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6007079 | Kincaid et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007080 | Kincaid et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010271 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6010272 | Littman | Jan 2000 | A |
6030141 | Lieber et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038771 | Takehara et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042294 | Urbach | Mar 2000 | A |
6076840 | Kincaid et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098287 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113302 | Buhl | Sep 2000 | A |
6116113 | Pazdirek et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6161451 | Gleason, II | Dec 2000 | A |
6171012 | Westphal | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6267387 | Weiss | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270098 | Heyring et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296235 | Dalal | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318742 | Franzini | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6517094 | Kincaid et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
20010006285 | Franzini | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020027051 | Grundei | Mar 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 00 199 | Aug 2000 | DE |
1 138 531 | Oct 2001 | EP |
2 351 951 | Jan 2001 | GB |
2-296524 | Dec 1990 | JP |
11-291737 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2001-295876 | Oct 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030090080 A1 | May 2003 | US |