None.
The present invention relates generally to downhole drilling operations and in particular to an apparatus for stabilizing and/or centralizing a pressure housing in a drill collar.
In recent years there has been a marked increase in the sophistication of downhole tools, and in particular, downhole tools deployed in the bottom hole assembly (BHA) of a drill string. A typical BHA commonly includes, for example, one or more logging while drilling (LWD) and/or measurement while drilling (MWD) tools. Such tools are well known to include various electronic sensors such as gamma ray sensors, neutron sensors, resistivity sensors, formation pressure and temperature sensors, ultrasonic sensors, audio-frequency acoustic sensors, magnetic sensors, acceleration sensors, and the like. LWD and MWD tools typically further include an electronic controller including at least one microprocessor and electronic memory. Moreover, a typical BHA further includes other tools, such as a telemetry tool, a formation sampling tool, and/or a rotary steerable tool, which include electronic controllers disposed to control, monitor, and record various tool functions during drilling.
It is also well known in the art that severe dynamic conditions are often encountered during drilling. Commonly encountered dynamic conditions include, for example, bit bounce, lateral shock and vibration, and stick/slip. Bit bounce includes axial vibration of the drill string, often resulting in temporary lift off of the drill bit from the formation (“bouncing” of the drill bit off the bottom of the borehole). Lateral shocks and vibrations are those which are transverse to the axis of the drill string and are often due to impact of the BHA with the borehole wall. Stick/slip refers to a torsional vibration induced by friction between drill string components and the borehole wall. Stick/slip causes rapid rotational acceleration and deceleration of the drill string and is known to produce instantaneous drill string rotation speeds many times that of the nominal rotation speed of the table. Bit bounce, lateral shock and vibration, and stick/slip are commonly recognized as leading causes of electronic failures in downhole tools. These electronic failures often result in costly trips (tripping the drill string in and out of the borehole) to repair or replace damaged tools and/or tool components.
Due in part to the above described dynamic conditions, the use of electronic sensors and controllers in downhole tools poses no small challenge. Moreover, it is commonly desirable to deploy MWD sensors (e.g., accelerometers, magnetometers, and gyroscopes) and certain LWD sensors (e.g., gamma ray sensors, neutron sensors, and density sensors) as close as possible to the longitudinal axis of the drill string. These sensors are typically deployed in a pressure housing that is centralized in the bore of a drill collar. In such configurations, it is typically desirable for the pressure housing to be both securely fixed to the drill collar and easily removable from the drill collar (e.g., for servicing the sensors between drilling operations). The centralizing mechanism should also be streamlined so as to enable drilling fluid to flow through the annulus between the inner surface of the drill collar and the outer surface of the pressure housing with minimal restriction.
Various centralizer configurations are known in the art. For example, one type of centralizer includes a pressure housing having metallic fins and/or rings sized and shaped to nearly contact the inner wall of the drill collar. This configuration may also employ o-rings for vibration dampening. While such an arrangement tends to adequately centralize the pressure housing(s), the necessary gap between the fins and drill collar tends to damage the inner surface of the collar under vibration and can actually amplify the shock and vibration seen by the electronics. Moreover, removal of the centralizer can be problematic due to mud packing between the ring and collar ID.
Another adaption of the metal finned or ring-type centralizer incorporates a wedge-locking device. These wedge-locking devices are typically energized using conventional screws. These devices often provide adequate locking and centralization of the pressure housing(s). However the screws have been known to loosen in service thereby unlocking the device and allowing motion of the device due to the downhole dynamic conditions. The screws have even been known to completely unscrew and fall down through the BHA to the bit where they can plug nozzles and causes drilling problems.
Another commercially available configuration utilizes molded rubber fins which are sized and shaped for a slight interference fit with the ID of the drill collar. While this arrangement tends to adequately dampen vibrations, installation and removal of the centralizer can be problematic due to the high coefficient of friction between rubber and steel. Moreover, the rubber fins are susceptible to tearing and chemical degradation which can lead to excessive movement of the pressure housings in service.
Pressure actuated, wedge locking centralizers are also known in the art. While such pressure actuated wedging mechanisms (provided by an inclined plane) increase the mechanical holding force of the stabilizer in the drill collar they tend to be bulky and therefore tend to significantly restrict the flow of drilling fluid through the drill collar. This restriction increases local fluid velocity and turbulence which in turn can lead to serious erosion and cavitation damage to the drill collar and pressure housing. Wedging mechanisms are further problematic in that a significant portion of the force exerted by the piston can be needed just to overcome the frictional forces between the wedge and the ramp and the movement needed between the wedge and the collar. The wedge style approach can also be problematic when trying to remove the system from the collar due to friction locking.
Therefore, there is a need in the art for an improved centralizer, for example, for centralizing and/or stabilizing pressure housings in a drill collar.
The present invention addresses one or more of the above-described shortcomings of prior art stabilizers for use in downhole tools. Aspects of this invention include a downhole tool having a pressure housing deployed in the bore of a drill collar. The pressure housing may include, for example, one or more MWD or LWD sensors deployed therein. At least three circumferentially spaced fins are deployed on the housing and in the annulus between an outer surface of the housing and an inner surface of the drill collar. In the preferred configuration two of the fins are rigid and configured to physically contact the drill collar and thereby stabilize and/or centralize the housing in the collar. A floating blade is deployed on the third fin. The blade includes a plurality of radial pistons deployed therein. The pistons are configured such that the surface area of the radially outward facing piston surfaces is greater than the surface area of the radially inward facing piston surfaces. This piston configuration causes the surface area of the radially outward facing blade surface to be less than the radially inward facing blade surface.
In operation, these surface area differences cause a differential force to be applied to the pistons and the blade when the tool is deployed in a subterranean borehole. In particular, the pistons are urged radially inward towards the housing and the blade is urged radially outward towards the drill collar under the influence of hydrostatic pressure. This stabilizing force tends to be directly proportional to the hydrostatic pressure.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention advantageously provide several technical advantages. For example exemplary embodiments of this invention provide a strong stabilizing force between the pressure housing and the drill collar when the downhole tool is deployed in a subterranean borehole. Moreover, the use of radial pistons minimizes frictional losses. The invention also enables easy removal of the pressure housing from the drill collar when the tool has been removed from the borehole.
Certain embodiments of the invention, for example those employing longitudinally spaced and circumferentially aligned radial pistons, are further advantageous in that they tend to impart minimal obstruction to the flow of drilling fluid through the tool annulus while also providing a strong stabilizing force to the housing. Enabling unobstructed fluid flow advantageously reduces erosion, which in turn can extend the service life of the downhole tool.
In one aspect this invention includes a downhole tool. The tool includes a substantially cylindrical drill collar having a longitudinal bore and a housing deployed in the bore. At least three axial fins are deployed on the housing. A floating blade is deployed on at least one of the fins. The floating blade is configured to extend radially outward into contact with an inner surface of the drill collar. The floating blade has radially inward and radially outward facing blade surfaces. The surface area of the radially inward facing blade surface is greater than the surface area of the radially outward facing blade surface. A plurality of radial pistons is deployed in the blade. Each of the pistons has corresponding radially inward and radially outward facing piston surfaces. The surface area of the radially inward facing piston surfaces is less than the surface area of the radially outward facing piston surfaces.
In another aspect, this invention includes an apparatus for stabilizing a pressure housing in a drill collar. The apparatus includes at least three axial fins deployed on the housing. A floating blade is deployed on at least one of the fins. The floating blade is configured to extend radially outward into contact with an inner surface of the drill collar. The floating blade has radially inward and radially outward facing blade surfaces. The surface area of the radially inward facing blade surface is greater than the surface area of the radially outward facing blade surface. A plurality of radial pistons is deployed in the blade. Each of the pistons has corresponding radially inward and radially outward facing piston surfaces. The surface area of the radially inward facing piston surfaces is less than the surface area of the radially outward facing piston surfaces.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter, which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring first to
It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention is not limited to use with a semisubmersible platform 12 as illustrated in
Turning now to
In the exemplary embodiment depicted, the inventive centralizer 200 includes a sleeve 210 having three or more radial fins 220. The sleeve 210 is deployed about a tandem sub 150 which is in turn connected to the pressure housing 120. The fins are configured to contact and apply force to the inner surface 112 of the tool body 110 and thereby stabilize the pressure housing 120 in the drill collar. As described in more detail below with respect to
In the exemplary embodiment depicted on
Turning now to
With continued reference to
With reference now to
A plurality of radial pistons 260 (preferably 4 or more) are deployed in corresponding recesses in the blade 250. In the exemplary embodiment shown, the pistons 260 are both longitudinally (axially) spaced and circumferentially aligned. This configuration in which the pistons 260 are longitudinally spaced and circumferentially aligned advantageously enables the use of a long, slender blade 250, which minimizes obstruction to the flow of drilling fluid as described above. The use of multiple (e.g., 4 or more) pistons 260 advantageously increases the magnitude of the radial force that may be applied to the blade 250, which in turn tends to improve the stabilization of the pressure housing 120. Moreover, the use of multiple pistons 260 is further advantageous in that it provides redundancy and improved tool reliability in service. Longitudinally spacing and/or circumferentially aligning the pistons 260 advantageously enables multiple pistons to be employed while also ensuring minimal fluid flow obstruction. As further depicted, the pistons 260 and blade 250 are configured to reciprocate with respect to one another in a substantially purely radial direction. This obviates the need for the use of a wedging mechanism and advantageously enables the blade motion to be purely radial.
With reference now to
As described above, stabilizer 200 is configured for hydrostatic pressure actuation. As is known to those of ordinary skill in the art, the annulus 115 fills with drilling fluid upon deployment of downhole tool 100 in a borehole, with the hydrostatic pressure of the drilling fluid increasing with increasing total vertical depth of the borehole. As depicted in
Upon removal of the tool 100 from the borehole, the pressure housing 120 and stabilizer(s) 200 may be readily removed from the drill collar 110. In the absence of hydrostatic pressure, the blade 250 floats on retaining pins 255 and therefore advantageously offers little (or no) resistance to such removal. The fins 220 being slightly under-gauge or in-gauge slide freely out of the collar 110.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alternations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3080924 | Baker et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3131769 | Rochmont | May 1964 | A |
3305021 | Lebourg | Feb 1967 | A |
3448805 | Brown | Jun 1969 | A |
3599712 | Magill | Aug 1971 | A |
4377207 | Kofahl | Mar 1983 | A |
4681160 | Fineberg | Jul 1987 | A |
4693328 | Furse et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
5168933 | Pritchard, Jr. et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181576 | Askew et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5293945 | Rosenhauch | Mar 1994 | A |
5379838 | Wilson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5417288 | Melenyzer et al. | May 1995 | A |
5603386 | Webster | Feb 1997 | A |
6019182 | Rountree et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6173786 | Sampson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6257356 | Wassell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6315041 | Carlisle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6419024 | George et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6488104 | Eppink | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497288 | George et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6877567 | Hirth | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7143848 | Armell | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7188689 | Maxwell et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7252152 | LoGiudice et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7413034 | Kirkhope et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422069 | Richard et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7503398 | LoGiudice et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7681665 | Eppink | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20020166664 | Lauritzen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040237640 | Meister et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244967 | Armell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256113 | LoGiudice et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050224227 | Hendrie | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060243435 | Faul | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272808 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080169107 | Redlinger et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080223573 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100276138 | Wittman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2381280 | Mar 2006 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110000665 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |