This invention relates to an improved hydro-mechanical variable valve actuation system.
In
In
The closest prior art is the multiair (or UniAir) system of Fiat, U.S. Pat. No. 6,918,364 etc, a lost motion hydro-mechanical VVA currently in mass production, wherein a cam,
The main advantages claimed by the multiair system are the reduction of the pumping loss and the variable modes the system can operate in order to optimize the operation of the engine. The present system,
In the prior art the intake valves of a cylinder close at a crankshaft angle to prevent more air from entering the cylinder, so that the load is controlled by controlling the “ingoing air”, so that the engine operates according the “ingoing air control” mode. As the piston moves towards BDC, the trapped air both expands and comes into contact with the walls. The expansion lowers the temperature of the air that increases the convection of heat from the walls to the air. The temperature of the air increases causing the respective pressure increase, i.e. the pressure at a crankshaft angle after BDC is higher than the pressure at an equal crankshaft angle before BDC, because in the meantime the walls warm the relatively colder air. The wider the crankshaft angle before and after BDC, the more the difference. A further temperature increase is caused by the pressure increase owing to the piston motion: the piston delivers more mechanical energy to the air because of the higher pressure, thereby causing even higher temperature.
In the present invention, the same intake valves stay open until a crankshaft angle before TDC. Air enters into the cylinder as the piston moves towards BDC with the intake valves open, then a part of the air exits from the cylinder as the piston moves towards TDC with the intake valves still open, until the crankshaft angle where the intake valves close, so that the engine load is controlled by controlling the “outgoing air”, so that the engine operates according the “outgoing air control” mode.
In this “outgoing air control” mode there is neither expansion of the trapped air before BDC, nor compression of trapped air after BDC and before the intake valves closing. The intake valves close with the pressure and temperature of the trapped air near to those of the intake manifold, and with the minimum mechanical energy spent for this intake stroke. I.e. replacing the “ingoing air control” mode of the closest prior art by the “outgoing air control” mode, the pumping energy reduces and the temperature of the air lowers. The swirl and turbulence resulting from the late closing of the intake valves of the “outgoing air control” mode can sustain until the combustion, whereas the swirl and turbulence resulting from the early closing of the intake valves of the “ingoing air control” mode of the prior art, have more time to die out before the combustion.
In this invention, the engine can operate either in the closest prior art mode,
I.e. the present system can do everything the prior art does, and many more, without additional cost or complication.
In order to upgrade the existing multiair system of Fiat into the present system, what it takes is a reprogramming of the digital unit and a substantially different cam contour for the camshaft, as shown in
The digital control enables various modes of operation. It enables even the use of different modes for different cylinders, for instance it makes possible the operation with some cylinders running according the “ingoing air control” mode, with some others running according the “outgoing air control” mode and with the rest cylinders deactivated.
The proper design of the cam contour, for instance as in the
An additional limb-home mode becomes available: the camshaft continues to close the intake valves a little before the combustion dead center, trapping into the cylinder a minimum quantity of charge and allowing the engine to keep on; by advancing the camshaft the engine load is controlled.
The “outgoing control” mode enables the over-expansion Atkinson/Miller cycle for economy and low emissions; combined with a Variable Compression Ratio system, like those disclosed in the patent applications U.S. Ser. No. 12/553,975, U.S. Ser. No. 12/546,714 and U.S. Ser. No. 12/404,355, the overall result is a variable capacity engine capable to provide better “overall fuel efficiency” and lower emissions as compared to the state-of-the-art hybrid cars. Applied on a Diesel engine, this system enhances the volumetric efficiency when it is advantageous, controls the actual compression ratio, enables the controllable exhaust gas recirculation, etc.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated in detail, the spirit and scope of the present invention are to be limited only by the terms of the appended claims.