Hydrocarbon conversion process using a chromium substituted molecular sieve

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The instant invention relates to molecular sieve compositions, the method for their preparation and to processes employing them. More particularly it relates to molecular sieve compositions topologically related to prior known molecular sieves but which are characterized as containing framework atoms of at least one of chromium or tin, and preferably having a very low content of defect sites in the structure, as hereinafter disclosed. In general the preparative process involves contacting a molecular sieve preferably with an aqueous solution of at least one of a fluoro salt of chromium or a fluoro salt of tin, preferably a fluoro salt which does not form insoluble salts with aluminum, under conditions suitable to insert chromium and/or tin for aluminum in the framework.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The crystal structures of naturally occurring and as-synthesized zeolitic aluminosilicates are composed of AlO.sub.4.sup.- and SiO.sub.4 tetrahedra which are crosslinked by the sharing of oxygen atoms. The term AlO.sub.4.sup.-, SiO.sub.4 and the like, are used to depict the tetrahedral atoms Al, Si and others, in four-fold coordination with oxygen, within the framework of the zeolite. It is understood that each of the four oxygen atoms thus depicted is linked to an additional tetrahedral atom, thus completing the charge requirements placed on each tetrahedral unit. The electrovalence of each tetrahedron containing an aluminum atom is balanced by association with a cation. Most commonly this cation is a metal cation such as Na.sup.+ or K.sup.+ but organic species such as quaternary ammonium ions are also employed in zeolite synthesis and in some instances appear as cations in the synthesized product zeolite. In general the metal cations are, to a considerable extent at least, replaceable with other cations including H.sup.+ and NH.sub.4.sup.+. In many instances the organic cation species are too large to pass through the pore system of the zeolite and hence cannot be directly replaced by ion exchange techniques. Thermal treatments can reduce these organic cations to H.sup.+ or NH.sub.4.sup.+ cations which can be directly ion-exchanged. Thermal treatment of the H.sup.+ or NH.sub.4.sup.+ cationic forms of the zeolites can result in the substantial removal of these cations from their normal association with the AlO.sub.4.sup.- tetrahedra thereby creating an electrovalent imbalance in the zeolite structure which must be accompanied by structural rearrangements to restore the electrovalent balance. Commonly when AlO.sub.4.sup.- tetrahedra constitute about 40% or more of the total framework tetrahedra, the necessary structural rearrangements cannot be accommodated and the crystal structure collapses. In more siliceous zeolites, the structural integrity is substantially maintained but the resulting "decationized" form has certain significantly different properties from its fully cationized precursor.
The relative instability of aluminum in zeolites, particularly in the non-metallic cationic or the decationized form, is well recognized in the art. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,640,681, issued to P. E. Pickert on Feb. 3, 1972, there is disclosed a process for extracting framework aluminum from zeolites which involves dehydroxylating a partially cation deficient form of the zeolite and then contacting it with acetylacetone or a metal derivative thereof to chelate and solubilize aluminum atoms. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid has been proposed as an extractant for extracting aluminum from a zeolite framework in a process which is in some respects similar to the Pickert process. It is also known that calcining the H.sup.+ or NH.sub.4.sup.+ cation forms of zeolites such as zeolite Y in an environment of water vapor, either extraneous or derived from dehydroxylation of the zeolite itself, is effective in removing framework aluminum by hydrolysis. Evidence of this phenomenon is set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 3,506,400, issued Apr. 14, 1970 to P. E. Eberly, Jr. et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 3,493,519, issued Feb. 3, 1970 to G. T. Kerr et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 3,513,108, issued May 19, 1970 to G. T. Kerr. In those instances in which the crystal structure of the product composition is retained after the rigorous hydrothermal treatment infrared analysis indicated the presence of substantial hydroxyl groups exhibiting a stretching frequency in the area of about 3740, 3640 and 3550 cm.sup.-1. The infrared analytical data of U.S. Pat. No. 3,506,400 is especially instructive in this regard. An explanation of the mechanism of the creation of these hydroxyl groups is provided by Kerr et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,493,519, wherein the patentees state that the aluminum atoms in the lattice framework of hydrogen zeolites can react with water resulting in the removal of aluminum from the lattice in accordance with the following equation: ##STR1##
The aluminum removed from its original lattice position is capable of further reaction with cationic hydrogen, according to Kerr et al. to yield aluminum-containing i.e., hydroxoaluminum, cations by the equation: ##STR2##
It has been suggested by Breck, D. W. and Skeels, G. W., "Zeolite Chemistry II. The Role of Aluminum in the Hydrothermal Treatment of Ammonium-Exchanged Zeolite Y, Stabilization", Molecular Sieves - II, A. C. S. Symposium Series 40, pages 271 to 280 (1977), that stabilization of NH.sub.4 Y occurs through hydrolysis of sufficient framework aluminum to form stable clusters of these hydroxoaluminum cations within the sodalite cages, thereby holding the zeolite structure together while the framework anneals itself through the migration of some of the framework silicon atoms.
It is alleged in U.S. Pat. No. 3,594,331, issued Jul. 20, 1971 to C. H. Elliott, that fluoride ions in aqueous media, particularly under conditions in which the pH is less than about 7, are quite effective in extracting framework aluminum from zeolite lattices, and in fact when the fluoride concentration exceeds about 15 grams active fluoride per 10,000 grams of zeolite, destruction of the crystal lattice by the direct attack on the framework silicon as well as on the framework aluminum can result. A fluoride treatment of this type using from 2 to 22 grams of available fluoride per 10,000 grams of zeolite (anhydrous) in which the fluorine is provided by ammonium fluorosilicate is also described therein. The treatment is carried out for the purpose of improving the thermal stability of the zeolite. It is theorized by the patentee that the fluoride in some manner becomes attached to the constructional alkali metal oxide, thereby reducing the fluxing action of the basic structural Na.sub.2 O which would otherwise result in the collapse of the crystal structure. Such treatment within the constraints of the patent disclosure has no effect on either the overall silicon content of the zeolite product or the silicon content of a unit cell of the zeolite.
Since stability is quite obviously, in part at least, a function of the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 content of the zeolite framework, it would appear to be advantageous to obtain zeolites having lower proportions of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 while avoiding the structural changes inherent in framework aluminum extraction. Despite considerable effort in this regard, however, only very modest success has been achieved, and this has applied to a few individual species only.
A process for increasing the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ratio in zeolites is disclosed in: commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,503,023, issue date Mar. 5, 1985, commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,610,856, issue date Sep. 9, 1986, U.S. Pat. No. 4,711,770, issue date Dec. 8, 1987 (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 880,103, filed Jun. 30, 1986), and in Skeels, G. W. and Breck, D. W. "Proceedings of the Sixth International Zeolite Conference", edited by David Olson and Attilio Bisio, Butterworth & Co. Ltd., pages 87 to 96 (1984). The process disclosed therein comprises inserting silicon atoms as SiO.sub.4 tetrahedra into the crystal lattice of an aluminosilicate having a SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 molar ratio of at least 3 and pore diameters of at least 3 Angstroms with a fluoro- silicate salt in an amount of at least 0.0075 moles per 100 grams of the zeolitic aluminosilicate on an anhydrous basis, said fluorosilicate salt being in the form of an aqueous solution having a pH value within the range of 3 to about 7 and brought into contact with the zeolitic aluminosilicate at a rate sufficiently slow to preserve at least 60 percent of the crystallinity of the starting zeolitic aluminosilicate.
Commonly assigned European Patent Application Serial No. 85,902,354.1 describes ammonium fluoride salts of the metal cations iron and/or titanium which are used to treat the zeolites in an aqueous medium. Framework aluminum is complexed by the fluoride and removed from the zeolite. The metal cation is inserted into the framework in place of the aluminum.
Various attempts have been made to substitute chromium or tin into a zeolite framework via primary synthesis methods but none have been truly successful so far. Attempts to synthesize zeolites of the pentasil family of zeolites (ZSM-5 like) with a number of ions other than aluminum have been made. In some cases chromium or tin is found with the zeolite but not in the framework of the zeolite. The likelihood that either chromium or tin is not a part of the zeolite framework in primary synthesis products rests on the fact that such a high pH is required for synthesis that it is probable that the chromium or tin are present as oxides and/or hydrous oxides. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,405,502 (Klotz) discloses the presence of up to 12.40 weight percent of Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 with the crystalline chromosilicate (Example IV), but the Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 in the product is present as amorphous or crystalline oxides. The examples teach that the chromium, initially dissolved in water, is rapidly precipitated as the hydroxide before ever coming in contact with the silica source. Further, "these results show that as the chromium factor became larger, more and more Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 was detected in the product." (Column 24, lines 15-17.)
Marosi et al., in German Patent No. 2,831,630, disclose the presence of between 0.50 weight percent and 3.00 weight percent of Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 with a ZSM-5 type structure. The amount of chromium that would be included in the framework of the ZSM-5, if indeed it were located therein, would range from 0.4 to 2.5 atoms out of 100 framework tetrahedral atoms. In the only Example where a product composition is given (1), the solid product would contain only 0.7 Cr atoms out of 100 in the framework, a value less than the compositions of the present invention. In Example 2 of U.K. Patent Application GB 2,024,790, (Taramasso et al.), a 6.00 weight percent of Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 with a ZSM-5 type structure was obtained and which was designated "TRS-28". While the claims teach that the chromium atoms either, "entered the crystalline lattice in place of silicon atoms" or "in the form of salts of bisilicic or polysilicic acids", the evidence presented in the examples fairly teach that the chromium is not within the lattice framework of the ZSM-5 product. Surface areas of all of the products of the invention are given which indicate that there is a substantial reduction relative to a typical ZSM-5. This is evidence of some amorphous or dense phase present with the zeolite. Typically ZSM-5 or its' more siliceous analog silicalite will have a surface area, (BET), of greater than 400 square meters per gram. The chromium containing product of the U.K. Patent Application GB 2,024,790, had a surface area (BET) of 380 square meters per gram, a value at least 5% less than what might be expected of a pure zeolite sample. Additionally, the chromium containing product of said invention containing 6.0 weight percent Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 would be expected to have an ion exchange capacity of 0.79 meq/gram, providing all of the chromium atoms were to be positioned in the framework in tetrahedral coordination with four oxygen atoms. However, only 0.0058 meq/gram of cations were actually found in the calcined (550.degree. C.) product, a value at least two orders of magnitude less than what would be necessary to balance the framework negative charges, if chromium were indeed in the framework. In order for chromium to be in the framework in tetrahedral coordination with four oxygen atoms, it is a requirement that there be present a positively charged species or cation in order to balance the negative charge caused by the presence of the trivalent chromium ion sharing the negative charges on four separate oxygen atoms with silicon. Lacking the cation, it is not possible for the chromium to be tetrahedrally coordinated with oxygen in this way and hence, the chromium of this example is not in the framework of the zeolite synthesized in the example. The converse is not necessarily true, namely, that if a positively charged cation is found to balance the negative charge on the chromium to satisfy the requirement of tetrahedral coordination with oxygen, that the chromium is in the framework. It would be evident that the chromium is in tetrahedral coordination with oxygen, but it does not necessarily prove that the chromium is located in the zeolite framework. It is probable that, like amorphous alumino-silicates, the amorphous chromosilicates can have tetrahedrally coordinated chromium atoms and hence ion exchange capacity.
European Patent Application 13,630 (Rubin et al.) discloses the presence of between 0.63 weight percent and 2.90 weight percent of Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 with a ZSM-12 type structure. The samples described in the Tables of the patent application, particularly the products containing chromium, show a substantial loss of surface area. This indicates that the purity of the as-synthesized products is questionable and that they must contain amorphous material. A relative relationship can also be found in the Tables, namely that as the chromium content of the synthesis product increases, the reported X-ray crystallinity decreases.
In European Patent Application 14,059 (Rubin et al.) between 0.09 weight percent and 1.26 weight percent of Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 with a ZSM-11 type structure was obtained. Similar observations can be made with these products; that the products containing chromium have reduced X-ray crystallinity, substantially reduced adsorption capacity for n-hexane and cyclohexane and substantially lower surface areas when compared to a product which does not contain chromium. Each observation taken alone would not preclude the incorporation of chromium in the ZSM-11 framework. However, taken together, these data are substantive evidence for the precipitation of an amorphous chromium containing phase with the zeolite, which under the very basic synthesis conditions employed is the expected result.
Dwyer et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,941,871 disclose the presence of tin in place of or as part of the organic template in a ZSM-5 type of a structure but not as a part of the ZSM-5 framework structure itself. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,329,328 (McAnespic et al.) the synthesis of a stannosilicate is suggested, but no examples of such synthesis are given nor are any properties of such materials suggested.
The above-mentioned references, while they may suggest the incorporation of the chromium or tin metal ions into the frameworks of the respective zeolites, provide consistent evidence that the metal ions are not included in the framework, and are merely precipitated with the zeolite as some other probably amorphous phase during the course of the synthesis process. Tielen et al. in "Proceedings of the International Symposium on Zeolite Catalysis", Siofok, Hungary, May 13, 1985, commented on isomorphic substitution in zeolites, stating that, "Generally speaking these new materials are claimed based upon their novel chemical composition or XRD spectrum or both. This novelty does not necessarily mean that the new materials contain the new element, or at least part of it, substituted in the zeolite framework. As far as we are aware, only in the case of boron substitution sound proof is available for its presence in the zeolite lattice." The reason for this failure is then obvious, since the very synthesis conditions used to synthesize the zeolite products are such that a nearly insoluble metal hydroxide precipitates thereby limiting the ability of the metal oxide to incorporate into the silicate units during crystal growth. This feature was only recently pointed out by Szostak et al. in Journal of Chemical Society, Faraday Trans. I. page 83 (1987). By recognizing the critical nature of the pH they were able to, for the first time, synthesize the ferrisilicate analog of ZSM-5.
It should be further pointed out that Tielen at the top of page 9 states "based on this table and the evidence mentioned in the introduction, elements with ionic radii between 0.020 and 0.061 are potential candidates for incorporation into a framework . . . " Using the values given for the Shannon references (radii in tetrahedral coordination) it is observed that Sn.sup.+4 has an ionic radius of 0.069 nm or 0.69 .ANG. (note that Shannon reports this value as the crystal radii) which is outside the range stipulated by Tielen and thus would not be expected to be in the framework. Although values for Cr.sup.+3 and Sn.sup.+2 are not provided in Tielen, they are provided by R. D. Shannon in his original paper (Acta Cryst. A 32, 751-767 (1976)) as Cr.sup.+3 =0.755 and Sn.sup.+2 =1.36. It should be noted that the values for Cr.sup.+3 and Sn.sup.+2 are for octahedral coordination and the number for tetrahedral coordination would be expected to be smaller. Further, the numbers presented by Tielen are the crystal radii (see Shannon Table 1, page 752). Accordingly, none of these metal ions would be expected to be in the framework.
Another reference which has been cited in this art is Canadian Patent No. 1,127,134 to Morrison. This reference discloses an "alumino-silicate zeolite" which contains a metal oxide selected from the group consisting of indium, boron, ruthenium, platinum, chromium, rare earth, vanadium, palladium, molybdenum, mercury, tellurium, silver and mixtures thereof. However, there is no mention or hint that these metals are or could be in the framework. Indeed, on page 6, lines 1-7, the patentees state that it is not known whether the metal is present as a metal or as a metal compound. Given this uncertainty, it would be pure speculation to state that Morrison discloses an aluminosilicate zeolite where some of the aluminum in the framework has been replaced by chromium or some other metal. Accordingly, there is nothing in Morrison that suggests a zeolite having chromium as a framework metal.
Two other references which deal with novel structures and methods of preparation of zeolites and mention chromium in passing are U.S. Pat. No. 4,581,212 (Araya) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,420,467 (Whittam). Although both references include chromium in a long list of elements that allegedly can be incorporated into the framework, we have reproduced their preparation and have determined that chromium is not in the framework (see Examples 26 and 27).
The above mentioned references do suggest that it is desirable to synthesize zeolites or molecular sieves containing chromium or tin in the framework tetrahedral sites. However the methods employed in the references leave little doubt that the metal has been deposited with the zeolite either as an oxide or hydroxide or as an amorphous metal silicate. The references further demonstrate the difficulty involved in the incorporation of these metal ions in the zeolite tetrahedral framework positions. The uniqueness of the method of the current application which relies on the solubility of the chromium and tin metal ions in an acidic medium, and the Secondary Synthesis procedure to incorporate the metal ions into the framework is further demonstrated. As for the obviousness of the Secondary Synthesis procedure to incorporate any metal ion into the framework of an existing zeolite, all attempts to use this process with the ions of phosphorus or boron have thus far been unsuccessful. Boron is the only metal ion thus far that has been successfully incorporated into the pentasil zeolite framework via primary synthesis methods (Tielen et al.). Only by careful control of the Secondary Synthesis conditions can one be successful in incorporating iron and/or titanium (D-13733), or chromium and/or tin into the framework of existing zeolites or molecular sieves.
Secondary Synthesis as used herein means a process whereby a molecular sieve product is treated by some method (Secondary Synthesis) to obtain a molecular sieve product that is either not obtainable by primary synthesis methods or is prepared with great difficulty or is not normally found in nature.
The present invention relates to novel zeolite compositions which contain significant framework tetrahedral atoms, which are not found to any significant level either in naturally occurring zeolites or in synthetic zeolites.
In the present invention, zeolite Y, zeolite L, mordenite and zeolite LZ-202 (an omega type zeolite prepared without the use of a templating agent as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,840,779) are treated with aqueous ammonium fluoride salts of either or both chromium or tin. During the treatment aluminum is removed from the molecular sieve framework and the metal ion is incorporated therein. By means of this invention, the metal ions of chromium and/or tin can be incorporated into molecular sieve frameworks where they are not normally found in nature.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURE
FIG. 1 is a ternary diagram wherein parameters relating to the instant compositions are set forth as mole fractions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
As stated this invention relates to a molecular sieve, a process for preparing the molecular sieve and processes using the molecular sieve. Accordingly, one embodiment of the invention is a molecular sieve composition having a three-dimensional microporous framework structure which has an unit empirical formula on an anhydrous basis of:
(Cr.sub.w Al.sub.x Si.sub.y)O.sub.2
where "w", "x" and "y" represent the mole fractions of chromium, aluminum and silicon, respectively, present as framework tetrahedral oxide units said mole fractions being such that they are within the triagonal area defined by points A, B, and C of FIG. 1, which points have the following values of w, x and y:
______________________________________Point w x y______________________________________A 0.49 0.01 0.50B 0.01 0.49 0.50C 0.01 0.01 0.98.______________________________________
Another embodiment of the invention is a process for preparing the molecular sieve described above, the process comprising contacting a crystalline microporous aluminosilicate zeolite having a framework structure of aluminum and silicon tetrahedral oxide units, pore diameters of at least about 3 Angstroms and a molar ratio of SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 of at least 2, with a fluoro salt of chromium, said fluoro salt being in the form of an aqueous solution or slurry, at a pH of about 3 to about 7 whereby framework aluminum atoms of the zeolite are removed and replaced by extraneous chromium atoms.
Yet another embodiment of the invention is a molecular sieve prepared by the process described above and having an empirical formula on an anhydrous basis of
(Al.sub.(a-N) Si.sub.b Cr.sub.c z)O.sub.2
where "(a-N)" represents the mole fraction of aluminum atoms, "a" represents the mole fraction of aluminum atoms present in the framework of the zeolite and varies from about 0.01 to about 0.49, "N" represents the mole fraction of aluminum atoms removed from the framework of the zeolite and varies from about 0.01 to about 0.49, "b" represents the mole fraction of silicon and varies from about 0.5 to about 0.98, "c" represents the mole fraction of chromium atoms and varies from about 0.01 to about 0.49; " " represents the framework defect sites; "z" represents the mole fraction of defect sites in the framework of the molecular sieve and varies from greater than zero to about 0.2; the molecular sieve characterized in that it has a cation equivalency of at least about 0.8, and the difference between the mole fraction of framework defect sites of the zeolite and the molecular sieve (.DELTA.z) is less than about 0.10.
A further embodiment of the invention is a molecular sieve having a three-dimensional microporous framework structure of chromium, aluminum and silicon tetrahedral oxide units and which has a unit empirical formula on an anhydrous basis of
(Al.sub.u Si.sub.v Cr.sub.w z)O.sub.2
where u is the mole fraction of aluminum and ranges from about 0.01 to about 0.49, v is the mole fraction of silicon and ranges from about 0.5 to about 0.98, w is the mole fraction of chromium and ranges from about 0.01 to about 0.49, is framework defect sites and z is the mole fraction of defect sites in the framework and ranges from greater than zero to about 0.2.
These and other objects and embodiments will become more apparent after a more detailed description of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to new molecular sieve compositions and to the processes for their preparation. The molecular sieves of the instant invention have three-dimensional microporous crystal framework oxide structures of "MO.sub.2 ", AlO.sub.2 and SiO.sub.2 in tetrahedral units which have a unit empirical formula on an anhydrous basis of:
(M.sub.w Al.sub.x Si.sub.y)O.sub.2 (1)
wherein "M" represents at least one of chromium or tin; and "w", "x" and "y" are as defined above represent the mole fractions of "M", aluminum and silicon, respectively, present as tetrahedral oxides.
The term "unit empirical formula" is used herein according to its common meaning to designate the simplest formula which gives the relative number of moles of chromium and/or tin (M), aluminum and silicon which form "MO.sub.2 ", AlO.sub.2, and SiO.sub.2 tetrahedral units within the molecular sieve. The unit empirical formula is given in terms of chromium and/or tin, aluminum and silicon as shown in Formula (1), above, and does not include other compounds, cations or anions which may be present as a result of the preparation or the existence of other impurities or materials in the bulk composition not containing the aforementioned tetrahedral units.
The instant process generally comprises a method for removing framework aluminum from zeolites having SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 mole ratios of about 2 or greater and substituting therefore one or more elements selected from the group consisting of chromium and/or tin. The resulting molecular sieves contain chromium and/or tin and have crystal structures similar to that of the initial zeolite.
The process of the invention comprises contacting a crystalline zeolite having pore diameters of at least about 3 Angstroms and having a molar SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ratio of at least 2, with an effective amount of at least one of a fluoro salt of chromium or a fluoro salt of tin, preferably in an amount of at least 0.001 moles per 100 grams of zeolite starting material, said fluoro salt being in the form of an aqueous solution or slurry and brought into contact with the zeolite either incrementally or continuously at a slow rate (optionally in the presence of a buffer) whereby framework aluminum atoms of the zeolite are removed and replaced by chromium and/or tin atoms. It is desirable that the process be carried out such that at least 60 percent, preferably at least 80 percent, and more preferably at least 90 percent of the crystal structure of the starting zeolite is retained and that the Defect Structure Factor (hereinafter defined) is increased by less than 0.10, and preferably by less than 0.08.
Crystalline zeolite starting materials suitable for the practice of the present invention can be any naturally occurring or synthetically produced zeolite species which have pores large enough to permit the passage of water, chromium and/or tin fluoro salts and reaction products through their internal cavity system. These materials can generally be represented, in terms of molar ratios of oxides, as
M.sub.2/n O:Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 :x SiO.sub.2 : y H.sub.2 O
wherein "M" is a cation having the valence "n", "x" is a value of at least about 2, and preferably about 3, and "y" has a value of from zero to about 9. This value of "y" depends upon the degree of hydration and the capacity of the particular zeolite to hold adsorbed water. Alternatively, the framework composition of the naturally occurring or synthetic zeolite starting material can be expressed in terms of the mole fraction of framework tetrahedra, TO.sub.2, as:
(Al.sub.a Si.sub.b)O.sub.2 (2)
wherein "a" is the mole fraction of framework tetrahedral sites occupied by aluminum atoms and "b" is the mole fraction of framework tetrahedral sites occupied by silicon atoms. Should the framework of the starting material contain atoms in addition to silicon and aluminum, these materials may be similarly expressed in terms of their "TO.sub.2 " formula in terms of their fractional occupation of the framework of the starting material. The algebraic sum of all of the subscripts within the brackets is equal to 1. In the above example, a+b=1.
Representative of the crystalline aluminosilicate zeolite molecular sieves include, but are not limited to erionite, mordenite, clinoptilolite, zeolite Y, zeolite L, zeolite LZ-202 (an omega type zeolite prepared without the use of a templating agent as disclosed in European Patent U.S. Pat. No. 4,840,779), zeolite omega, zeolite beta, zeolite TMA offretite, LZ-105, ZSM-5, ZSM-34 and ZSM-35. Zeolite Y is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,130,007; zeolite L is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,216,789; LZ-105 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,257,885; zeolite omega is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,241.036; zeolite beta is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,308,069; ZSM-5 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,702,886; ZSM-34 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,086,186; and ZSM-35 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,992,466. Both naturally occurring and synthetically prepared zeolite molecular sieves can be used.
For reasons more fully explained hereinafter, the starting zeolite should be able to withstand the initial loss of framework aluminum atoms to at least a modest degree without collapse of the crystal structure unless the process is to be carried out at a very slow rate, or the process is to be buffered. In general the ability to withstand aluminum extraction and maintain a high level of crystallinity is directly proportional to the initial SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 molar ratio of the zeolite. Accordingly, it is preferred that the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ratio is preferably at least about 2.0, and more preferably about 3. It is also preferred that at least about 50 percent, and more preferably at least 95 percent of the AlO.sub.4.sup.- tetrahedra of the naturally occurring or as-synthesized zeolite are present in the starting zeolite. Most advantageously the starting zeolite contains as many as possible of its original AlO.sub.4.sup.- tetrahedra, i.e. the starting zeolite has not been subjected to any post-formation treatment which either extensively removes aluminum atoms from their original framework sites or converts them from the normal conditions of 4-fold coordination with oxygen.
The cation population of the starting zeolite is not a critical factor insofar as substitution of chromium and/or tin for framework aluminum is concerned, but since the substitution mechanism may involve the in situ formation of salts of at least some of the zeolitic cations, it is generally advantageous that these salts be water-soluble to a substantial degree to facilitate their removal from the molecular sieve product. It is found that ammonium or hydronium cations form the most soluble salts in this regard and it is accordingly preferred that partially or at least 50 percent, most preferably 85 or more percent, of the zeolite cations be ammonium or hydronium cations. Sodium, one of the most common cations present in zeolites, is found to form Na.sub.3 AlF.sub.6, which is only very sparingly soluble in either hot or cold water. When this compound is formed as precipitates within the structural cavities of the zeolite it is quite difficult to remove by water washing. Its removal, moreover, is important if thermal stability of the molecular sieve product is desired since substantial amounts of fluoride can cause crystal collapse at temperatures as low as 500 .degree. C.
For purposes of simplifying the description of the products of the above process, as above defined the framework composition of the zeolite starting material and the products of the instant process are expressed in terms of mole fractions of framework tetrahedra, i.e., the "TO.sub.2 ", where T represents the substituting tetrahedral atom in the framework. The starting zeolite may be expressed as:
(Al.sub.a Si.sub.b z)O.sub.2
whereas "a" is the mole fraction of aluminum tetrahedra in the framework; "b" is the mole fraction of silicon tetrahedra in the framework; " " denotes defect sites in the framework; and "z" is the mole fraction of defect sites in the zeolite framework. In many cases the "z" value for the starting zeolite is zero and the defect sites are simply eliminated from the expression. Numerically the sum of the values a+b+Z=1.
If defect sites are present, the molecular sieves of this invention can have a unit empirical formula expressed in terms of the mole fractions of framework tetrahedra (TO.sub.2) of:
(Al.sub.u Si.sub.v M.sub.w z)O.sub.2
where u is the mole fraction of aluminum and ranges from about 0.01 to about 0.5, v is the mole fraction of silicon and ranges from about 0.5 to about 0.98, M is chromium, tin or mixtures thereof, w is the mole fraction of M and ranges from about 0.01 to about 0.49, is framework defect sites and z is the mole fraction of defect sites in the framework and ranges from greater than zero to about 0.2.
When the molecular sieves of this invention are prepared by the specific process of this invention, then the molecular sieve can have a unit empirical formula expressed in terms of the mole fractions of tetrahedra (TO.sub.2) of:
(Al.sub.(a-N) Si.sub.b M.sub.c z)O.sub.2
wherein: "N" is defined as the mole fraction of aluminum tetrahedra removed from the framework during the treatment; "a" is the mole fraction of aluminum tetrahedra present in the framework of the starting zeolite; "b" is the mole fraction of silicon tetrahedra present in the framework of the zeolite; " " is the framework defect sites; "z" is the mole fraction of defect sites in the framework and varies from greater than zero to about 0.2; "M" denotes chromium and/or tin; and "c" is the mole fraction of chromium and/or tin tetrahedra resulting front the fluoro salt treatment of the instant process and varies from about 0.01 to about 0.5. Numerically, the sum of the values:
(a-N)+b+c+z=1;
The term "Defect Structure Factor" for any given zeolite is equivalent to the "z" value of that particular zeolite. The net change in Defect Structure Factors between the starting zeolite and the product zeolite is equivalent to ".sup..DELTA. z".
.sup..DELTA. z=z (product zeolite)-z (starting zeolite)
Theoretically, there should be no change in the silicon content and therefore "c" should equal (N-.sup..DELTA. z) where ".sup..DELTA. z" is the net change in the mole fraction of defect sites in the zeolite framework resulting from the treatment. However, in reality fluoride does sometimes react with silicon of the molecular sieve particularly on the surface of the crystals of the more siliceous molecular sieves causing etching and transport of silicon atoms to other defect sites of the crystal. Hence "c" will not always be actually equal to (N-.sup..DELTA. z).
The chromium and/or tin-containing molecular sieve compositions prepared by the instant processes have framework aluminum removed from the starting zeolite with substitution of chromium and/or tin. The process generally comprises:
(a) contacting at effective process conditions a zeolite with an effective amount of at least one of a fluoro salt of chromium or a fluoro salt of tin; and
(b) isolating the chromium and/or tin-containing molecular sieve product from the reaction mixture.
The instant process generally comprises contacting a crystalline zeolite having a pore diameter of at least about 3 Angstrome and having a molar SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ratio of at least 2, with at least 0.0075 moles of a fluoro salt of chromium or a fluoro salt of tin, per 100 grams of zeolite starting material, said fluoro salt being in the form of a solution or slurry. The fluoro salt is preferably provided as an aqueous solution or slurry but it is believed that solutions or slurries employing alcohols and other organic solvents may be employed.
It is necessary that the solution or slurry be maintained at an effective OH. The "effective pH" is a pH such that under effective process conditions: a) a monomeric species of the chromium and/or tin is present in the reaction solution; and b) the pH is high enough to avoid undue destructive acidic attack on the particular zeolite structure, apart from the intended reaction with an effective amount of the fluoro salt. The effective amount of fluoro salt is that amount which provides sufficient fluoride and chromium and/or tin for the process and the desired amount of chromium and/or tin in the final molecular sieve product. The effective pH value for this invention is generally greater than one (1), more preferably greater than 3 (three) and most preferably in the range of about 3 to about 7 (seven).
A pH of about 3 or more usually assures that no acid degradation of the zeolite occurs but it may not necessarily be the optimum pH for the formation of monomeric species of either chromium and/or tin in the solution. At pH values below about 3 crystal degradation of many zeolites is found to be unduly severe. Whereas at pH values higher than 7, insertion of the chromium and/or tin may be slow from a practical standpoint as a result of the solubility of chromium and/or tin at these pHs and as a result of certain polymerization reactions. A pH of 7 and above typically results in no monomeric species of either chromium and/or tin being present in the solution so that very little substitution of these metal atoms in the framework would occur. Frequently the polymeric species of chromium and/or tin will precipitate as solid oxides or hydrous oxides at pH 7 or above.
The fluoro salt solution or slurry is brought into contact with the zeolite either incrementally or continuously at a slow rate whereby framework aluminum atoms of the zeolite are removed and replaced by chromium and/or tin atoms from the fluoro salt.
The solution or slurry of the fluoro salt, preferably aqueous, is brought into contact with the zeolite either incrementally or continuously at an effective rate such that a portion of the framework aluminum atoms are removed and replaced by chromium and/or tin atoms at a rate which preferably retains at least 80 percent and more preferably at least 90 percent of the crystal structure of the starting zeolite.
The fluoro salt used as the aluminum extractant and also as the source of chromium and/or tin, which is inserted into the zeolite structure in place of the extracted aluminum, can be any of the fluoro salts having the general formula:
A.sub.2/b MF.sub.6 or A.sub.2/b MF.sub.4
where "M" is tin and "A" is a metallic or non-metallic cation, having the valence "b". Cations represented by "A" include alkylammonium, H.sup.+, NH.sub.4.sup.+, Mg.sup.++, Li.sup.+, Na.sup.+, K.sup.+, Ba.sup.++, Cd.sup.++, Cu.sup.+, Cu.sup.++, Ca.sup.++, Cs.sup.+, Fe.sup.++, Co.sup.++, Pb.sup.++, Mn.sup.++, Rb.sup.+, Ag.sup.+, Sr.sup.++, Tl.sup.+, and Zn.sup.++, or the formula A.sub.2/b MF.sub.5, where "M" is chromium. The ammonium and hydronium cation forms of the fluoro salt are generally preferred because of their solubility in water and also because these cations form water soluble by-product salts upon reaction with the zeolite, e.g., (NH.sub.4).sub.3 AlF.sub.6 and/or (NH.sub.4).sub.2 AlF.sub.5. Other salts which may be used include a combination of salts of MF.sub.3 and 3/2(NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2) or MF.sub.4 and NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 where M is chromium or tin. Preferred fluoro salts are (NH.sub.4).sub.3 CrF.sub.5 ; CrF.sub.3.3/2((NH.sub.4)HF.sub.2); NH.sub.4 SnF.sub.3 ; SnF.sub.2.3/2(NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2) and SnF.sub.4.NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2.
The manner in which the fluoro salt of chromium or the fluoro salt of tin and the starting zeolite are brought into contact and the overall process of substituting chromium and/or tin for aluminum in the zeolite framework is believed to be a two step process in which the aluminum extraction step tends to, unless controlled, proceed very rapidly while the insertion of chromium and/or tin is generally relatively slow. If dealumination becomes too extensive without the substitution of chromium and/or tin the crystal structure becomes seriously degraded and ultimately collapses. While not wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it appears that fluoride ion acts as the agent for extraction of framework aluminum in accordance with the equation: ##STR3##
It is important, therefore, that the initial dealumination step be inhibited and the step involving insertion of chromium and/or tin be promoted to achieve the desired molecular sieve product. It is found that the various zeolites have varying degrees of resistance toward degradation as a consequence of framework aluminum extraction without substitution of chromium and/or tin into the framework. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above the pH is preferably within the range of 3 to 7. The higher pH inhibits the rate and amount of dealumination. Also, increasing the reaction temperature tends to increase the rate of substitution of chromium and/or tin. Increasing the reaction temperature has been found to have less of an effect on dealumination than the pH of the solution. Therefore, the pH may be considered a means of controlling dealumination while temperature may be considered as a means of controlling the substitution rate.
Whether it is necessary or desirable to buffer the reaction system or select a particular fluoro salt concentration to control the pH is readily determined for each zeolite species by routine observation and evaluation. The question of whether the reaction system may advantageously be buffered will in large part depend on the selection of the particular starting zeolite, since zeolites have varying tolerances to acid and base media. For example, some zeolites such as mordenite and clinoptilolite can withstand very low pH conditions and a high level of dealumination without collapse of the crystal structure. When it is advantageous to buffer the reaction mixture in a particular pH range the reaction mixture may be buffered in a manner as generally heretofore employed in the art. The use of buffering salts, such as ammonium acetate, or use of an inert solid to react with excess acid or base, e.g. clays or aluminas, may be suitable to buffer the pH of the reaction mixture.
Theoretically, there is no lower limit for the concentration of fluoro salt of chromium and/or tin in the aqueous solution or slurry employed. A slow rate of addition of the fluoro salt generally provides adequate time for the insertion of chromium and/or tin as a framework substitute for extracted aluminum before excessive aluminum extraction occurs with consequent collapse of the crystal structure. Practical commercial considerations, however, may require that the reaction proceed as rapidly as possible, and accordingly the conditions of reaction temperature and reagent concentrations will necessarily be optimized with respect to each zeolite starting material and with respect to commercial operation. In general it is believed that the more highly siliceous the zeolite, the higher the permissible reaction temperature and the lower the pH conditions which may be employed in the instant process. In general the preferred effective reaction temperature is within the range between about 10.degree. C. and about 99.degree. C., preferably between about 20.degree. C. and 95.degree. C., but temperatures of 125.degree. C. or higher and as low as 0.degree. C. are believed employable in some instances with some zeolite starting materials and with fluoro salts in a form other than aqueous solutions or slurries. The maximum concentration of fluoro salt in the aqueous solution employed is, of course, interrelated to the temperature and pH factors and also with the time of contact between the zeolite and the solution and the relative proportions of zeolite and fluoro salt. Solutions having fluoro salt concentrations of between about 10.sup.-3 moles per liter of solution and up to saturation of the solution can be employed, but it is preferred that concentrations in the range of between about 0.5 and about 1.0 moles per liter of solution be used. In addition, as hereinbefore discussed, slurries of the fluoro salts of chromium and/or tin may be employed. The aforementioned concentration values are with respect to true solutions, and are not intended to apply to the total fluoro salts in slurries of the salts in water. Even very slightly soluble fluoro salts can be slurried in water and used as a reagent, the undissolved solids being readily available to replace dissolved molecular species consumed in reaction with the zeolite. As stated hereinabove, the amount of dissolved fluoro salts employed with respect to the particular zeolite being treated will depend to some extent upon the physical and chemical properties of the individual zeolites and other effective process conditions. However, the minimum value for the amount of fluoro salt to be added is preferably at least equivalent to the minimum mole fraction of aluminum to be removed from the zeolite.
In specifying the proportions of the zeolite starting material or adsorption properties of the zeolite product and the like herein, the "anhydrous state" of the zeolite will be intended unless otherwise stated. The term "anhydrous state" is employed herein to refer to a material substantially devoid of both physically adsorbed and chemically adsorbed water. In general a zeolite may be prepared in the anhydrous state by heating the zeolite in dry air at about 450.degree. C. for about 4 hours.
It is apparent from the foregoing that, with respect to effective process conditions, it is desirable that the integrity of the zeolite crystal structure be substantially maintained throughout the process, and that, in addition to having chromium and/or tin atoms inserted into the lattice, the zeolite retains at least 60 percent, preferably at least 80 and more preferably at least 90 percent of its original crystallinity. A convenient technique for assessing the crystallinity of the products relative to the crystallinity of the starting material is the comparison of the relative intensities of the d-spacings of their respective X-ray powder diffraction patterns. The sum of the peak heights, in terms of arbitrary units above background, of the starting material is used as the standard and is compared with the corresponding peak heights of the products. When, for example, the numerical sum of the peak heights of the molecular sieve product is 85 percent of the value of the sum of the peak heights of the starting zeolite, then 85 percent of the crystallinity has been retained. In practice it is common to utilize only a portion of the d-spacing peaks for this purpose, as for example, five of the six strongest d-spacings. In zeolite Y these d-spacings correspond to the Miller Indices 331. 440, 533, 642 and 555. Products of the instant invention will have a certain fraction of the framework tetrahedra replaced by tin and/or chromium atoms. Because atoms of these heavier elements are incorporated there may be a decrease in the X-ray crystallinity values due to scatter because of the heavier elements. In this case, more reliable indicia of the crystallinity retained by the zeolite product are the degree of retention of surface area or the degree of retention of the adsorption capacity. Surface areas can be determined by the well-known Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method (B-E-T). See for example, Journal of American Chemical Society, Volume 60, page 309 (1938) using nitrogen as the adsorbate. In determining the adsorption capacity, the capacity for oxygen at 90.degree. K. (-183.degree. C.) at 100 Torr is preferred. Accordingly, the compositions of this invention are characterized in that they retain at least 60, preferably 70 and most preferably 90 percent of the oxygen adsorption capacity of the starting zeolite. Since it is preferred that the starting zeolite be highly crystalline and not have any defect, it is preferred that the instant compositions have at least 60, preferably 70 and most preferably 90 percent of its theoretical oxygen adsorption capacity as measured at 100 torr and 90.degree. K.
The present compositions are also characterized in that they have a cation equivalency of at least 0.8. Cation equivalency is the molar ratio of M'.sup.+ /Al in the molecular sieve. Four-fold coordination of aluminum in the zeolite framework produces a net negative charge on the zeolite framework, requiring a cation M.sup.+ to balance the charge. The Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al, can be a direct measure of the amount of framework aluminum in the zeolite. Cations, here represented as the monovalent species, M.sup.+, can be any cation capable of entering the zeolite pores and balancing the framework charges. Representative of such cation species are Na.sup.+, K.sup.+, NH4.sup.+, Ca.sup.++, Mg.sup.++, Rare Earth.sup.+++, H.sup.+, and even hydroxoaluminum cation species Al(OH)2.sup.+, Al(OH)2.sup.+, AlO.sup.+. etc. Of course, hydroxoaluminum cations are not framework atoms, and thus when present they will have the effect of reducing the measured Cation Equivalent M.sup.+ /Al, since Al is taken to represent all of the aluminum present in the zeolite composition. Other non-cationic aluminum species such as forms of amorphous Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 may also be present with the zeolite composition. This form of amorphous Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 results from degradation to the zeolite that may occur as the result of a particular treatment. Presence of an amorphous Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 phase will also have the effect of reducing the value of the Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al, since Al is taken to represent all of the Al present in the zeolite composition. It is obvious then, that a low value for the Cation Equivalent indicates the presence of a substantial amount of zeolite degradation or the presence of a substantial amount of cationic aluminum. The higher the value for the Cation Equivalent, the greater the amount of the compositional Al present in the framework of the zeolite.
It is highly desirous that the residual Al be present in the framework of the molecular sieve instead of as an aluminum cation species or as amorphous Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, especially if the desired utility of the chromium substituted product is in a catalytic application. Cation Equivalency can be directly related to the ion exchange capacity of the zeolite. The catalytic application would require that the Cr substituted zeolite product be acid exchanged (either H.sup.+ or an NH4.sup.+ form) to produce the catalytically active form of the zeolite on calcination. Since the Secondary Synthesis process has already reduced the aluminum content of the zeolite by substitution of the Cr for Al, it is important that as many as possible of the remaining Al be present at framework Al, thus insuring that the exchange capacity for the potential acidic species H.sup.+ and NH4.sup.+ is maximized.
It is advantageous to perform the routine chemical analysis on a form of the zeolite in which M' is an equivalent monovalent cation other than hydrogen. This avoids the uncertainty which can arise in the case of divalent or polyvalent metal zeolite cations as to whether the full valence of the cation is employed in balancing the net negative charge associated with each AlO.sub.4.sup.- tetrahedron.
Analysis of the Substitution Mechanism
The following is a hypothetical description of the mechanism involved and may not be the actual mechanism that is taking place. This description is based upon the present available data and analysis of the substitution products of this invention. This hypothetical description seems to be consistent with that data and may help to explain this unique process.
All available evidence, to date, indicates that the above described process of this invention is unique in being able to produce zeolites essentially free of defect structure and having chromium and/or tin inserted into the framework by a secondary synthesis process. In untreated, i.e. naturally occurring or as-synthesized zeolites the original tetrahedral structure is conventionally represented as ##STR4##
After treatment with a complexing agent such as ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid (H.sub.4 EDTA) in which a stoichiometric reaction occurs whereby framework aluminum atoms along with an associated cation such as sodium is removed as NaAIEDTA, it is postulated that the tetrahedral aluminum is replaced by four protons which form a hydroxyl "nest", as follows: ##STR5##
In the practice of this invention, a two-step process is envisioned. In the first step of the treatment, tetrahedral aluminum atoms are first hydrolyzed and removed from the zeolite framework, whereupon they immediately react to form a more stable aluminum species or compound (i.e. aluminum fluoride species).
In the second step, ions of suitable size and coordination number are inserted into the vacant tetrahedral sites created by the dealumination.
85,902,354.1 (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 604,179) (Attorney Docket No. 13,733), involves replacement of framework aluminum by either iron and/or titanium. The present work involves replacement by either tin atoms or chromium atoms or both into vacant framework sites created by the dealumination.
The individual steps of the process can be accomplished in separate operations. However, it is more desirable to perform both steps in a single efficient operation. A particularly efficient class of compounds which can effect the dealumination and framework substitution steps in a single operation can be designated by J.sub.x TF.sub.y, where T represents the substituting tetrahedral atom. The substituting tetrahedral atom (T) when hydrolyzed in solution forms a hydroxylated species and an acid. The acid subsequently attacks the Al in the framework to cause the dealumination. The fluoride (F) serves to complex with the removed aluminum atoms, and J is the charge-balancing cation or cations. While the process is carried out in an aqueous system, it is not necessary that the J.sub.x TF.sub.y compound be dissolved in the solution. It is only necessary that it be sufficiently soluble to initiate the reaction with the zeolite. It is important that the reaction by-product (the aluminum fluoride) be in a form that is readily removed from the zeolite by a washing step, subsequent to the substitution reaction. The presence of fluoride in the zeolite product in concentrations as low as 1 weight percent (or even lower), results in decreased thermal stability of the zeolite crystals. The residual fluoride can react with Si in the zeolite at elevated temperatures to cause the zeolite crystal to collapse.
Salts of the class of compounds J.sub.x TF.sub.y which have been used in the practice of this invention are:
NH.sub.4 SnF.sub.3 ; 3(NH.sub.4 F).CrF.sub.3 ; 3(NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2).CrF.sub.3, SnF.sub.2.NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 ; SnF.sub.4.NH.sub.4.NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 ; and CrF.sub.3.NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2.
Among the list of zeolites known to react with one or more of the above listed compounds to effect framework substitution are: the synthetic zeolite Y, mordenite, zeolite L and zeolite LZ-202 (an omega type zeolite prepared without the use of a templating agent as disclosed in (U.S. Pat. No. 4,840,779). With all of these zeolites, the reaction to dealuminate the starting zeolite and replace the removed aluminum atoms with a different tetrahedral atom did take place, at least to some extent, although the resulting zeolite may not have been the optimum product.
The chemistry of the process can be envisioned approximately in the following way. In the first step an aqueous slurry of the zeolite is contacted with a solution of J.sub.x TF.sub.y salt. In some cases, because of the limited solubility of J.sub.x TF.sub.y, the zeolite and the salt can be slurried together. The salt hydrolyzes in aqueous solution to form acid, H.sub.3 O.sup.+ and free fluoride. One example of this hydrolysis where T=Sn and J=NH.sub.4 can be depicted as follows:
a) (NH.sub.4).sub.2 SnF.sub.6. . . 2(NH.sub.4).sup.+ +2F.sup.- +SnF.sub.4
b) SnF.sub.4 +2H.sub.2 O . . . SnF.sub.3 OH+H.sub.3 O.sup.+ +F.sup.-
c) SnF.sub.3 OH+2H.sub.2 O . . . SnF.sub.2 (OH).sub.2 +H.sub.3 O.sup.+ +F.sup.-
d) SnF.sub.2 (OH).sub.2 +2H.sub.2 O . . . SnF(OH).sub.3 +H.sub.3 O.sup.+ +F.sup.-
e) SnF(OH).sub.3 +2H.sub.2 O . . . Sn(OH).sub.4 +H.sub.3 O.sup.+ +F.sup.-
The acid thus formed (H.sub.3 O).sup.+, reacts rapidly to dealuminate the zeolite. The removed aluminum rapidly reacts with the free fluoride to form aluminum fluoride salts such as AlF.sub.3, (NH.sub.4).sub.2 AlF.sub.5, and (NH.sub.4).sub.3 AlF.sub.6.
This reaction is the most crucial part of the process, since the dealumination step is very rapid. If too much dealumination occurs (without substitution into the vacant tetrahedral sites), the zeolite quickly loses its crystal structure. The use of a buffer such as ammonium acetate, thereby keeping the pH greater than about 6.0, can be used to slow down the hydrolysis so that the slower substitution step can take place. Another method of controlling the dealumination step is to add the J.sub.x TF.sub.y solution very slowly to the zeolite slurry. In this manner, some substitution can occur before the zeolite framework is excessively dealuminated to the point of causing crystal collapse. With the slow addition of the J.sub.x TF.sub.y solution, the zeolite itself acts as a "buffer" in the system.
The second step is the substitution of a new tetrahedral atom into the zeolite structure in place of the removed aluminum atom. This step has been found to be the overall rate-limiting or slow step. Increasing the temperature of the system increases the rate of substitution, but it may also speed up the rate of other undesirable side reactions such as the dealumination or the continued hydrolysis of T to form a polymeric species which will no longer be able to substitute in the framework defect sites. The exact chemistry of the substitution step is not known in detail. It can be suggested that dealumination of the zeolite leaves a hydroxyl nest in the vacant site, which in turn reacts with the hydrolyzed form of the substituting tetrahedral atom.
The stepwise reaction can be depicted as follows: ##STR6## The overall reaction can be stated as: ##STR7##
The Experimental Conditions
The infrared spectrum of the aluminum depleted zeolite will show a broad nondescript absorption band beginning at about 3750 cm.sup.-1 and extending to about 3000 cm.sup.-1. The size of this absorption band or envelope increases with increasing aluminum depletion of the zeolite. The reason that the absorption band is so broad and without any specific absorption frequency is that the hydroxyl groups in the vacant sites in the framework are coordinated in such a way that they interact with each other (hydrogen bonding). The hydroxyl groups of adsorbed water molecules are also hydrogen-bonded and produce a similar broad absorption band as do the "nest" hydroxyls. Also, certain other zeolitic hydroxyl groups, exhibiting specific characteristic absorption frequencies within the range of interest, will if present, cause infrared absorption bands in these regions which are superimposed on the band attributable to the "nest" hydroxyl groups. These specific hydroxyls are created by the decomposition of ammonium cations or organic cations present in the zeolite.
It is, however, possible to treat zeolites, prior to subjecting them to infrared analysis, to avoid the presence of the interfering hydroxyl groups and thus be able to observe the absorption attributable to the "nest" hydroxyls only. The hydroxyls belonging to adsorbed water are avoided by subjecting the hydrated zeolite sample to vacuum activation at a moderate temperature of about 200.degree. C. for about 1 hour. This treatment permits desorption and substantially complete removal of the adsorbed water. Complete removal of adsorbed water can be ascertained by noting when the infrared absorption band at about 1640 cm.sup.-1, the bending frequency of water molecules, has been removed from the spectrum.
The decomposable ammonium cations can be removed, at least in large part, by ion-exchange and replaced with metal cations, preferably by subjecting the ammonium form of the zeolite to a mild ion exchange treatment with an aqueous NaCl solution. The OH absorption bands produced by the thermal decomposition of ammonium cations are thereby avoided. Accordingly the absorption band over the range of 3745 cm.sup.-1 to about 3000 cm.sup.-1 for a zeolite so treated is almost entirely attributable to hydroxyl groups associated with defect structure and the absolute absorbance of this band can be a measure of the degree of aluminum depletion.
It is found, however, that the ion-exchange treatment, which must necessarily be exhaustive even though mild, required considerable time. Also the combination of the ion-exchange and the vacuum calcination to remove adsorbed water does not remove every possible hydroxyl other than defect hydroxyls which can exhibit absorption in the 3745 cm.sup.-1 to 3000 cm.sup.-1 range. For instance, a rather sharp band at 3745 cm.sup.-1 has been attributed to the Si-OH groups situated in the terminal lattice positions of the zeolite crystals and to amorphous (non-zeolitic) silica from which physically adsorbed water has been removed. For these reasons it is preferred to use a somewhat different criterion to measure the degree of defect structure in the zeolite products of this invention.
In the absence of hydrogen-bonded hydroxyl groups contributed by physically adsorbed water, the absorption frequency least affected by absorption due to hydroxyl groups other than those associated with framework vacancies or defect sites is at 3710.+-.5 cm.sup.-1. Thus the relative number of defect sites remaining in a zeolite product of this invention can be gauged by first removing any adsorbed water from the zeolite, determining the value of the absolute absorbance in its infrared spectrum at a frequency of 3710 cm.sup.-1, and comparing that value with the corresponding value obtained from the spectrum of a zeolite having a known quantity of defect structure. The following specific procedure has been arbitrarily selected and used to measure the amount of defect structure in the products prepared in the Examples appearing hereinafter. Using the data obtained from this procedure it is possible, using simple mathematical calculation, to obtain a single and reproducible value hereinafter referred to as the "Defect Structure Factor", denoted hereinafter by the symbol "z", which can be used in comparing and distinguishing the present novel zeolite compositions from their non-chromium and/or tin containing counter-parts.
DEFECT STRUCTURE FACTOR "Z"
(A) Defect Structure Zeolite Standard: Standards with known amounts of defect structure can be prepared by treating a crystalline zeolite of the same species as the product sample with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid by the standard procedure of Kerr as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,442,795. In order to prepare the standard it is important that the starting zeolite be well crystallized, substantially pure and free from defect structure. The first two of these properties are readily determined by conventional X-ray analysis and the third by infrared analysis using the procedure set forth in part (B) hereof. The product of the aluminum extraction should also be well crystallized and substantially free from impurities. The amount of aluminum depletion, i.e., the mole fraction of tetrahedral defect structure of the standard samples can be ascertained by conventional chemical analytical procedure. The molar SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ratio of the starting zeolite used to prepare the standard sample in any given case is not narrowly critical, but is preferably within about 10% of the molar SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ratio of the same zeolite species used as the starting material in the practice of the process of the present invention.
(B) Infrared Spectrum of Product Samples and Defect Structure Zeolite Standard: Fifteen milligrams of the hydrated zeolite to be analyzed are pressed into a 13 mm. diameter self-supporting wafer in a KBr die under 5000 lbs, pressure. The wafer is then heated at 200.degree. C. for 1 hour at a pressure of not greater than 1.times.10.sup.-4 mm Hg to remove all observable traces of physically adsorbed water from the zeolite. This condition of the zeolite is evidenced by the total absence of an infrared absorption band at about 1640 cm.sup.-1. Thereafter, and without contact with adsorbable substances, particularly water vapor, the infrared spectrum of the wafer is obtained on an interferometer system at 4 cm.sup.-1 resolution over the frequency range of at least 3745 to 3000 cm.sup.-1. Both the product sample and the standard sample are analyzed using the same interferometer system to avoid discrepancies in the analysis due to different apparatus. The spectrum, normally obtained in the transmission mode of operation is mathematically convened to and plotted as wave number vs. absorbance.
(C) Determination of the Defect Structure Factor: The defect structure factor (z) is calculated by substituting the appropriate data into the following formula: ##EQU1## wherein AA.sub.(ps) is the infrared absolute absorbance measured above the estimated background of the product sample at 3710 cm.sup.-1 ; AA.sub.(std) is the absolute absorbance measured above the background of the standard at 3710 cm.sup.-1 and the mole fraction of defects in the standard are determined in accordance with part (A) above.
Once the defect structure factor, z, is known, it is possible to determine from the wet chemical analysis of the product sample for SiO.sub.2, Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, chromium and/or tin and the cation content as M.sub.2/n O whether chromium and/or tin has been substituted for aluminum in the zeolite as a result of the treatment and also the efficiency of the substitution of chromium and/or tin.
The essential X-ray powder diffraction patterns appearing in this specification and referred to in the appended claims are obtained using either: 1) standard X-ray powder diffraction techniques; or 2) computer based techniques using copper K-alpha radiation and using Siemens D-500 X-ray powder diffractometers with Siemens Type K-805 X-ray sources, available from Siemens Corporation, Cherry Hill, N.J., with appropriate computer interface. When employing the standard X-ray technique the radiation source is a high-intensity, copper target, x-ray tube operated at 50 Kv and 40 ma. The diffraction pattern from the copper K alpha radiation and graphite monochromator is suitably recorded by an X-ray spectrometer scintillation counter, pulse-height analyzer and strip-chart recorder. Flat compressed powder samples are scanned at 2.degree. (2 theta) per minute, using a 2 second time constant. Interplanar spacings (d) are obtained from the position of the diffraction peaks expressed as 2 theta, where 2 theta is the Bragg angle as observed on the strip chart. Intensities are determined from the heights of diffraction peaks after subtracting background.
All of the zeolite samples were evaluated according to standard analytical procedures. The x-ray crystallinity of most samples was measured using the Siemens D-500 where peak areas as well as peak intensities of all major reflections were measured and compared against untreated samples of the starting materials. It was expected that the product of a successful experiment would maintain a major fraction of its x-ray crystallinity. Unit cell values were measured on materials possessing cubic unit cells (a.sub.o).
Framework infrared spectra of the treated zeolites were compared to the framework spectra of the respective starting materials. A general overall shift of the framework absorption frequencies to higher wave numbers is a good indication of a higher silicon content in the framework. Shift of the asymmetric stretch band at about 950-1250 cm.sup.-1 accompanies dealumination. The symmetric stretch band, 750-835 cm.sup.-1 is more sensitive to the actual silicon content in the framework, shifting to higher wave numbers as the silicon content increases. Very little is known about the effect of substitution of atoms other than silicon into the zeolite framework on the position of these bands. Very little effect on the position of the symmetric stretch band has been observed as a result of simple dealumination. However, because there are not studies of the effect of dealumination on the positions or shifts of the framework infrared bands with zeolites other than Y and perhaps mordenite; the lack of a substantial shift of the symmetric stretch band was not used as the sole criterion to judge the degree of metal atom substitution.
More specifically, there are no studies of the effect of substituting either chromium or tin or both for aluminum in the zeolite framework on shifts of framework infrared bands. A general assumption would be that ions larger than Al would increase the unit cell size causing a decrease in framework infrared absorption band positions. Conversely, substitution of ions smaller than Al into the zeolite framework would cause a decrease in unit cell size and an increase in framework infrared absorption band positions.
The hydroxyl region infrared spectrum was used to evaluate the relative amount of framework defect sites in the zeolite product of this invention. For a more thorough description of this method of evaluation see U.S. Pat. No. 4,503,023. Briefly, using standard procedures, the absolute absorbance (above background) at 3710 cm.sup.-1 was measured and compared to a standard sample of aluminum-depleted NaY which contained a known number of defects. The defect structure factor (z) of the reference standard was 0.140 and gave rise to an absolute absorbance value of 0.330 at 3710 cm.sup.-1 of the infrared spectrum. The reference value of z in this case is the mole fraction of vacant tetrahedral sites in the zeolite framework of the aluminum-depleted NaY. Fourteen percent of all of the tetrahedral sites do not contain a tetrahedral atom (Si or Al), but rather, some o form of hydrogen-bonded OH groups.
In determining the cation equivalency, i.e. the molar ratio M.sup.+ /Al in each zeolite product, it is advantageous to perform the routine chemical analysis on a form of the zeolite in which "M" is an equivalent monovalent cation other than hydrogen. This avoids the uncertainty which can arise in the case of divalent or polyvalent metal zeolite cations as to whether the full valence of the cation is employed in balancing the net negative charge associated with each AlO.sub.4.sup.- tetrahedron.
EXAMPLES
The following examples are provided to illustrated the invention and are not intended to be limiting thereof.
Practice of the invention is demonstrated by the following examples. After the substitution of Sn and Cr in place of Al in the framework of zeolites via treatment with aqueous ammonium fluoride salts, all the zeolite products were washed well in hot distilled water following reaction. Samples of the dried powders were examined by x-ray powder diffraction techniques for retention of crystallinity. Those samples judged to be crystalline were further examined by differential thermal analysis methods (DTA), measurement of O.sub.2 adsorption isotherms at -183.degree. C. (90.degree. K.), measurement of H.sub.2 O adsorption capacity at 4.6 torr and 25.degree. C., infrared analyses of both the OH region and the mid-range (framework) region, and finally by complete chemical analysis.
In some of the X-ray patterns reported, the relative intensities of the d-spacings are indicated by the notations vs, s, m, w and vw which represent very strong, strong, medium, weak and very weak, respectively.
Examples 1 through 5 disclose the substitution of Cr.sup.3+ in the framework of Zeolite Y and the resulting product was designated LZ-239.
EXAMPLE 1
Two gm NH.sub.4 Y (anhydrous weight) containing 8.544 millimoles of Al were slurried in 100 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. Fifty ml of a second solution containing 21.36 millimoles CrF.sub.3 and 64.08 millimoles NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 in 250 ml distilled water, was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 2 ml every 5 minutes. Following the addition of the chrome solution, the temperature was raised to 95.degree. C. and the slurry was digested for 3 hours at 95.degree. C. A green colored product was obtained which was filtered, washed free of soluble fluoride with hot distilled water, dried and characterized. The product contained 11 weight percent Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3, it showed substantially reduced X-ray crystallinity, and an estimated unit cell value of 24.55 .ANG. and a substantial increase in the Defect Structure Factor, z. Reduced crystallinity may have been caused by two factors in this case. A certain amount of apparent disorder in the structure is to be expected due to the larger chromium cation which can be present both in the framework and as a hydroxylated cation [Cr(OH).sup.2+, Cr(OH).sub.2.sup.+ ]. Incorporation of the heavier chromium atoms into the structure should cause loss of peak intensity and area due to the scattering of X-rays by the heavier atoms of chromium. In addition, the acidic nature of the bifluoride anion probably caused some degradation to the acid sensitive Y zeolite framework structure.
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting NH.sub.4 Y and the LZ-239 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting NH.sub.4 Y: (Al.sub.0.277 Si.sub.0.705 0.018)O.sub.2 LZ-239 Product: (Al.sub.0.115 Cr.sub.0.075 Si.sub.0.634 0.176)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N: 0.162
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 58
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : 0.158
(e) Moles of Chromium Substituted per Mole of Aluminum Removed, c/N :0.463
EXAMPLE 2
Two gm NH.sub.4 Y (anhydrous weight) containing 8.544 millimoles of Al were slurried in 100 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. Fifty mi of a second solution containing 21.36 millimoles CrF.sub.3 and 64.08 millimoles NH.sub.4 F in 250 ml distilled water, was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 2 mi every 5 minutes. Following the addition of the chrome solution, the temperature was raised to 95.degree. C. and the slurry was digested for 3 hours at 95.degree. C. The product was filtered, washed free of soluble fluoride with hot distilled water, dried and characterized. A green colored product which was obtained contained 10 weight percent Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3. It showed good retention of X-ray crystallinity, and an estimated unit cell value of 24.58 .ANG..
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting NH.sub.4 Y and the LZ-239 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting NH.sub.4 Y: (Al.sub.0.277 Si.sub.0.705 0.018)O.sub.2 LZ-239 Product: (Al.sub.0.210 Cr.sub.0.080 Si.sub.0.660 0.050)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N: 0.067
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 24
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : 0.032.
(e) Moles of Chromium Substituted per Mole of Aluminum Removed, c/N: 1.19
EXAMPLE 3
Two gm NH.sub.4 Y (anhydrous weight) containing 8.544 millimoles of Al were slurried in 100 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. Fifty ml of a second solution containing 21.36 millimoles CrF.sub.3 and 64.08 millimoles NH.sub.4 F in 250 ml distilled water, was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 2 mi every 5 minutes. Following the addition of the chrome solution, the temperature was raised to 95.degree. C. and the slurry was digested for half an hour. The product was filtered, washed free of soluble fluoride with hot distilled water, dried and characterized. The product contained 10 weight percent Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3, showed good retention of X-ray crystallinity, and an estimated unit cell value of 24.63 .ANG..
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting NH.sub.4 Y and the LZ-239 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting NH.sub.4 Y: (Al.sub.0.277 Si.sub.0.705 0.018)O.sub.2 LZ-239 Product: (Al.sub.0.206 Cr.sub.0.082 Si.sub.0.665 0.047)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N/a: 0.071
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 26
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : 0.029.
(e) Moles of chromium Substituted per Mole of Aluminum Removed, c/N: 1.15
EXAMPLE 4
Two gm NH.sub.4 Y (anhydrous weight) containing 8.544 millimoles of Al were slurried in 100 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. Fifty ml of a second solution containing 21.36 millimoles CrF.sub.3 and 64.08 millimoles NH.sub.4 F in 250 ml distilled water, was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 2 ml every 5 minutes. The slurry was digested for half an hour at 75.degree. C. The product was filtered, washed free of soluble fluoride with hot distilled water, dried and characterized. The product contained 10 weight percent Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3, showed good retention of X-ray crystallinity, and an estimated unit cell value of 24.64 .ANG..
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting NH.sub.4 Y and the LZ-239 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting NH.sub.4 Y: (Al.sub.0.277 Si.sub.0.705 0.018)O.sub.2 LZ-239 Product: (Al.sub.0.204 Cr.sub.0.079 Si.sub.0.658 0.059)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N: 0.073
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 26
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : 0.041
(e) Moles of chromium Substituted per Mole of Aluminum Removed, c/N: 1.08
The molecular sieves denominated herein as LZ-239 have the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite Y as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings as set forth in Table A.
TABLE A______________________________________LZ-239 Cr.sup.3+ Substituted Zeolite YD(A) Relative Intensity______________________________________13.9-14.3 vs8.4-8.8 m7.2-7.6 m5.5-5.7 s4.6-4.8 m4.3-4.5 m3.7-3.9 s3.2-3.4 m2.7-2.9 m______________________________________
The summary of the Chemical Analyses and Product Properties of Examples 1, 2, 3 and 4 are disclosed in Table B.
TABLE B__________________________________________________________________________Summary of the Chemical Analysesand Product Properties of Examples 1-4 Starting Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 NH.sub.4 Y (LZ-239) (LZ-239) (LZ-239) (LZ-239)__________________________________________________________________________Chemical Analyses:Na.sub.2 O, wt. % 2.32 1.06 1.97 1.64 1.66(NH.sub.4).sub.2 O, wt. % 9.92 2.60 6.77 6.00 5.79Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % 21.78 11.47 18.62 17.05 17.38Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % -- 11.15 10.58 10.10 9.93SiO.sub.2, wt. % 65.21 74.45 68.83 64.80 65.93F.sub.2, wt. % -- 0.40 0.87 0.80 0.61SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 5.08 11.01 6.27 6.45 6.53SiO.sub.2 /[Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 + Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 ] 5.08 6.67 4.54 4.62 4.65M.sup.+ /Al 1.07 0.60 0.89 0.85 0.81X-Ray Crystallinity:% by Area 100 24 57 57 57% by Intensity 100 22 55 57 56Unit Cell, a.sub.O in A 24.71 24.55 24.58 24.63 24.64Framework Infrared:Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.- 1 : 1019 1050 1029 1029 1028Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 787 799 793 793 792Hydroxyl Region Infrared:Absorb. @ 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.042 0.415 0.117 0.111 0.139Defect Factor, z: 0.018 0.176 0.050 0.047 0.059McBain Absorption Values:wt. % O.sub.2 @ 100 torr 32.7 22.0 26.8 25.8 29.2and 90K:wt. % H.sub.2 O @ 4.6 torr 30.6 22.2 26.5 26.4 28.9and 25.degree. C.:__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 5
The products of Examples 2, 3 and 4 above were examined by SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy) and EDAX analysis techniques. Using standard coating methods, the samples were first coated by carbon and examined, then coated with gold or silver and reexamined. The carbon coated samples provide better surfaces for EDAX analysis. Better resolution of the respective peaks of the different elements are obtained without interference from the large peaks due to gold or silver used to coat the samples. The gold or silver coating makes the sample a better conductor and better resolution of the details of the crystal surface is obtained. The crystals were examined first after carbon coating to obtain elemental analysis by EDAX. The substituting element, Cr, was located and the relative distribution of the element throughout the crystals was noted. Then the sample was coated with either gold or silver and the crystallite morphology was examined to ascertain whether there were unusual material deposits or whether the zeolite crystals had been altered. A sample showing the usual crystal morphology of the respective zeolite, with no spurious crystalline or amorphous "junk", and a relatively even distribution throughout the crystals of the substituting ion, was considered to be consistent with a conclusion that the substituting ion had indeed substituted into the zeolite framework. EDAX of the product of Example 2 showed that Cr was well dispersed throughout the zeolite crystals. Significant levels of Cr were found on crystals of all sizes. The amount of Cr was similar throughout the individual crystals in the sample and was no different from an EDAX area scan showing Cr distribution throughout the entire sample. The silver coated sample showed fairly clean crystal surfaces with no evidence of any extraneous material deposited on or with the zeolite as a result of the Secondary Synthesis treatment.
SEM and EDAX analyses of the product of Example 3 and Example 4 are consistent with the other properties measured on the samples showing Cr substituting for Al in the framework of the Y zeolite. Cr substituted Y zeolite is denoted LZ-239.
EXAMPLE 6
Example 6 discloses the substitution of Cr.sup.3+ in the framework of zeolite mordenite and the resulting product was designated LZ-249.
Twenty-five gm (anhydrous weight) of hydronium exchanged mordenite Zeolon was used. (Zeolon is a Trademark of Norton Co., Worcester, Mass., U.S.A. ), H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite, containing 49.85 millimoles of Al were slurried in 200 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. Fifty ml of a second solution containing 24.92 millimoles CrF.sub.3 and 74.78 millimoles NH.sub.4 F in 50 ml distilled water, was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 2 ml every 4 minutes. Following the addition of the chrome solution, the temperature was raised to 95.degree. C. and the slurry was digested for 3 hours at 95.degree. C. The product was filtered. The first filtrate was green in color but was clear on continued washing with water. The solid product was green and was washed free of soluble fluoride with hot distilled water, dried and characterized. The product contained 3.5 weight percent Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 and showed excellent retention of X-ray crystallinity. The molecular sieves denominated herein as LZ-249 have the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite mordenite as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings as set forth in Table C.
TABLE C______________________________________LZ-249 Cr.sup.3+ Substituted MordeniteD(A) Relative Intensity______________________________________13.3-13.7 m8.8-9.2 m6.4-6.6 s4.4-4.6 s3.9-4.1 s3.7-3.9 m3.4-3.6 vs3.3-3.5 s3.1-3.3 s______________________________________
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ and the LZ-249 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite: (Al.sub.0.097 Si.sub.0.715 0.188)O.sub.2 LZ-249 Product: (Al.sub.0.083 Cr.sub.0.026 Si.sub.0.777 0.114)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N: 0.014
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 14
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : -0.074
(e) Moles of Chromium Substituted per Mole of Aluminum Removed, c/N: 1.86
A comparison of the Cr.sup.3+ substituted product, designated LZ-249, with the starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite is shown in Table D.
TABLE D______________________________________Summary of the Chemical Analysesand Product Properties of Examples 1-4 Starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ Example 6 mordenite (LZ-249)______________________________________Chemical Analyses:Na.sub.2 O, wt. % 0.54 0.14(NH.sub.4).sub.2 O, wt. % -- 2.97Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % 10.17 7.78Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % -- 3.54SiO.sub.2, wt. % 88.01 85.53F.sub.2, wt. % -- 0.40SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 14.69 18.66SiO.sub.2 /[Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 + Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 ] 14.69 14.29M.sup.+ /Al 0.09 0.89X-Ray Crystallinity:% by Area 100 107% by Intensity 100 114Framework Infrared:Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1080 1080Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 788 793Hydroxyl Region Infrared:Absorb. @ 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.442 0.269Defect Factor, z: 0.188 0.114McBain Absorption Values:wt. % O.sub.2 @ 100 torr 18.68 18.27and 90K:wt. % H.sub.2 O @ 4.6 torr 15.68 14.03and 25.degree. C.:wt. % neopentane @ 5.96 5.08500 torr & 25.degree. C.:wt. % SF.sub.6 @ 400 torr 10.59 8.63and 25.degree. C.______________________________________
EXAMPLE 7
Example 7 discloses the substitution of Cr.sup.3+ in the framework of zeolite LZ-202 and the resulting product was designated LZ-250.
LZ-202 is an omega type zeolite, possessing structure and properties similar to zeolite omega, but synthesized in an organic-free medium. Twenty five gm (anhydrous weight) of ammonium exchanged LZ-202 containing 91.70 millimoles of Al were slurried in 200 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. A second solution containing 45.85 millimoles CrF.sub.3 and 137.55 millimoles NH.sub.4 F in 100 ml distilled water was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 5 ml every 5 minutes. Following the addition of the chrome solution, the temperature was raised to 95.degree. C. and the slurry was digested for 3 hours at 95.degree. C. The product was filtered. The first filtrate was green in color but was clear on washing with water. The solid product was green and was washed free of soluble fluoride with hot distilled water, dried and characterized. The product contained 8.5 weight percent Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 and showed fair retention of X-ray crystallinity. However, measurements of the McBain adsorption capacity showed almost complete retention of pore volume and is probably a better measure of crystallinity retention than X-ray. Incorporation of the heavier chromium atom into the framework would cause reduced intensity and area values due to scatter. The molecular sieves denominated herein as LZ-250 have the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite LZ-202 as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings as set forth in Table E.
TABLE E______________________________________LZ-250 Cr.sup.3+ Substituted Zeolite LZ-202D(A) Relative Intensity______________________________________15.4-15.8 m8.9-9.3 vs7.6-8.0 s6.6-7.0 s5.7-6.1 s4.6-4.8 m3.7-3.9 s3.6-3.8 m3.5-3.7 m3.4-3.6 s3.05-3.25 s2.98-3.18 s2.92-3.12 m2.81-3.01 s______________________________________
A comparison of the Cr.sup.3+ substituted product, LZ-250, with the starting NH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite LZ-202 is shown in the following Table F.
TABLE F______________________________________Summary of the Chemical Analysesand Properties of LZ-250 with the StartingNH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite LZ-202. Starting Example 7 NH.sub.4 LZ-202 (LZ-250)______________________________________Chemical Analyses:Na.sub.2 O, wt. % <0.02 --(NH.sub.4).sub.2 O, wt. % 8.78 7.06Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % 18.70 14.98Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % -- 8.53SiO.sub.2, wt. % 72.98 69.79F.sub.2, wt. % -- 0.83SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 6.62 7.91SiO.sub.2 /[Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 + Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 ] 6.62 5.72M.sup.+ /Al 0.92 0.92X-Ray Crystallinity:% by Area 100 55% by Intensity 100 61Framework Infrared:Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1038 1042Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 816 817Hydroxyl Region Infrared:Absorb. @ 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.114 0.118Defect Factor, z: 0.048 0.050McBain Absorption Values:wt. % O.sub.2 @ 100 torr 18.18 18.02and 90K:wt. % H.sub.2 O @ 4.6 torr 18.48 17.02and 25.degree. C.:wt. % neopentane @ 1.50 3.90500 torr & 25.degree. C.:wt. % SF.sub.6 @ 400 torr -- 3.18and 25.degree. C.______________________________________
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting NH.sub.4 -LZ-202 and the LZ-250 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting NH.sub.4 -LZ-202:(Al.sub.0.221 Si.sub.0.731 0.048)O.sub.2 LZ-250 Product: (Al.sub.0.178 Cr.sub.0.068 Si.sub.0.704 0.050)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N: 0.043
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 19
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : 0.002
(e) Moles of chromium Substituted per Mole of Aluminum Removed, c/N: 1.58
EXAMPLE 8
Example 8 discloses the substitution of Cr.sup.3+ in the framework of zeolite L and the resulting product was designated LZ-251.
Twenty-five gm (anhydrous weight) of ammonium exchanged zeolite L, NH4.sup.+ zeolite L, containing 95.25 millimoles of Al were slurried in 200 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. 100 ml of a second solution containing 47.62 millimoles CrF.sub.3 and 142.88 millimoles NH.sub.4 F in distilled water was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 5 ml every 5 minutes. Following the addition of the chrome solution, the temperature was raised to 95.degree. C. and the slurry was digested for 3 hours at 95.degree. C. The product was filtered and washed free of soluble fluoride. All of the filtrates were colorless. The solid product was green, contained 8.3 weight percent Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 and showed good retention of X-ray crystallinity. Again, measurement of the retention of adsorption capacity is a better measure of the retained crystallinity of the product due to scatter of X-rays by the heavier chromium atom. The molecular sieves denominated herein as LZ-251 have the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite L as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings as set forth in Table G.
TABLE G______________________________________LZ-251 Cr.sup.3+ Substituted Zeolite LD(A) Relative Intensity______________________________________15.6-16.0 vs5.9-6.1 s5.7-5.9 m4.5-4.7 s4.3-4.5 m4.2-4.4 m3.8-4.0 m3.56-3.76 m3.38-3.58 m3.18-3.38 m3.08-3.28 s2.97-3.17 m2.81-3.01 m______________________________________
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting NH.sub.4 L and the LZ-251 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting NH.sub.4 L: (Al.sub.0.248 Si.sub.0.732 0.020)O.sub.2 LZ-251 Product: (Al.sub.0.194 Cr.sub.0.069 Si.sub.0.690 0.047)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N: 0.054
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 22
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : 0.027
(e) Moles of chromium Substituted per Mole of Aluminum Removed, c/N: 1.28
A comparison of the Cr.sup.3+ substituted product, LZ-251, with the starting NH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite L is shown in the following Table H.
TABLE H______________________________________Summary of the Chemical Analyses and Propertiesof LZ-251 with the starting NH.sub.4 zeolite L Starting Example 8 NH.sub.4 L (LZ-251)______________________________________Chemical Analyses:K.sub.2 O, wt. % 3.51 2.98(NH.sub.4).sub.2 O, wt. % 7.89 5.71Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % 19.42 15.71Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % -- 8.33SiO.sub.2, wt. % 67.80 65.83F.sub.2, wt. % -- 0.89SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 5.92 7.11SiO.sub.2 /[Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 + Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 ] 5.92 5.24M.sup.+ /Al 1.00 0.92X-Ray Crystallinity:% by Area 100 64% by Intensity 100 64Framework Infrared:Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1028 1031Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 768 772Hydroxyl Region Infrared:Absorb. @ 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.048 0.111Defect Factor, z: 0.020 0.047McBain Absorption Values:wt. % O.sub.2 @ 100 torr 16.14 15.78and 90K:wt. % H.sub.2 O @ 4.6 torr 17.97 17.16and 25.degree. C.:wt. % neopentane @ -- 8.41500 torr & 25.degree. C.:wt. % SF.sub.6 @ 400 torr -- --and 25.degree. C.______________________________________
EXAMPLE 9
Example 9 discloses the substitution of Sn.sup.2+ in the framework of zeolite Y and the resulting product was designated LZ-238.
Two gm NH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite Y (anhydrous weight) containing 8.544 millimoles of Al were slurried in 100 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. Fifty five ml of a second solution containing 4.27 millimoles NH.sub.4 SnF.sub.3 in distilled water was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 5 ml every 5 minutes. Following addition of the fluorostannate solution, the slurry was digested for 3 hours at 95.degree. C. The solid product was filtered, washed free of soluble fluoride, dried and characterized. The LZ-238 product was yellow and contained 22.7 weight percent SnO as determined by chemical analysis. Based on the total characterization of the product, it is believed that a large fraction of the tin has replaced aluminum in the zeolite framework. The remainder of the tin is present both as cation and as a precipitated oxide, SnO. The X-ray powder pattern showed a trace of SnO in the background of the pattern and a substantial reduction in the X-ray crystallinity of the Y zeolite. However, McBain adsorption capacities measured on the product show that at least 80 percent of the void volume of the LZ-238 was retained. The reduced X-ray crystallinity may be due to scatter caused by incorporation of the heavier tin atom into the structure of the zeolite. The molecular sieves denominated herein as LZ-238 have the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite Y as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings as set forth in Table I.
TABLE I______________________________________LZ-238 Sn.sup.2+ Substituted Zeolite YD(A) Relative Intensity______________________________________13.9-14.3 vs8.4-8.8 m7.2-7.6 m5.5-5.7 s4.6-4.8 m4.3-4.5 m3.7-3.9 s3.2-3.4 m2.7-2.9 m______________________________________
A comparison of the Sn.sup.2+ substituted product, LZ-238, with the starting NH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite Y is shown in the following Table J.
TABLE J______________________________________Summary of the Chemical Analyses and Propertiesof LZ-238 with the Starting NH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite Y Starting Example 8 NH.sub.4 Y (LZ-238)______________________________________Chemical Analyses:Na.sub.2 O, wt. % 2.32 1.78(NH.sub.4).sub.2 O, wt. % 9.92 4.99Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % 21.78 14.96Sn.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % -- 22.68SiO.sub.2, wt. % 65.21 53.56F.sub.2, wt. % -- 0.07SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 5.08 6.07SiO.sub.2 /[Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 + SnO/2] 5.08 3.86M.sup.+ /Al; (Na.sup.+, NH.sub.4.sup.+): 1.07 0.85X-Ray Crystallinity:% by Area 100 30% by Intensity 100 29Unit Cell, a.sub.O in A: 24.71 24.54Framework Infrared:Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1019 1027Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 787 792Hydroxyl Region Infrared:Absorb. @ 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.042 0.123Defect Factor, z: 0.018 0.052McBain Absorption Values:wt. % O.sub.2 @ 100 torr 32.70 23.54and 90K:wt. % H.sub.2 O @ 4.6 torr 30.60 24.48and 25.degree. C.:wt. % neopentane @ -- --500 torr & 25.degree. C.:wt. % SF.sub.6 @ 400 torr -- --and 25.degree. C.______________________________________ *Sample contained some fraction of the Sn as SnO as observed in the Xray powder pattern.
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting NH.sub.4 Y and the LZ-238 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting NH.sub.4 Y: (Al.sub.0.277 Si.sub.0.705 0.018)O.sub.2 LZ-238 Product: (Al.sub.0.206 Sn.sub.0.118 Si.sub.0.624 0.052)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N: 0.071
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 26
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : 0.034
(e) Moles of chromium Substituted per Mole of Aluminum Removed, c/N: 1.66
EXAMPLE 10
Example 10 discloses the substitution of Sn.sup.2+ in the framework of zeolite mordenite and the resulting product was designated LZ-252.
Twenty-five gm (anhydrous weight) of hydronium exchanged mordenite Zeolon was used. (Zeolon is a Trademark of Norton Co., Worcester, Mass., U.S.A.), H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite, containing 49.85 millimoles of Al were slurried in 200 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. A second solution containing 24.92 millimoles NH.sub.4 SnF.sub.3 in 100 ml distilled water was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 5 ml every 5 minutes. Following the addition of the tin solution, the temperature was raised to 95.degree. C. and the slurry was digested for 3 hours at 95.degree. C. The product was filtered, washed free of soluble fluoride with hot distilled water, dried and characterized. The product was colorless, contained 12.3 weight percent SnO and showed good retention of X-ray crystallinity. No crystalline SnO was detected in the background of the X-ray powder pattern. The SEM and EDAX analyses of this sample show that tin is well dispersed throughout the zeolite crystals. The molecular sieves denominated herein as LZ-252 have the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite mordenite as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings as set forth in Table K.
TABLE K______________________________________LZ-252 Sn.sup.2+ Substituted MordeniteD(A) Relative Intensity______________________________________13.3-13.7 s8.8-9.2 vs6.4-6.6 s4.4-4.6 s3.9-4.1 s3.7-3.9 m3.4-3.6 vs3.3-3.5 s3.1-3.3 s______________________________________
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite and the LZ-252 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite: (Al.sub.0.097 Si.sub.0.715 0.088)O.sub.2 LZ-252 Product: (Al.sub.0.58 Sn.sub.0.052 Si.sub.0.764 0.126)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N: 0.039
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 40
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : -0.062
(e) Moles of chromium substituted per mole of aluminum Removed, c/N: 1.33
A comparison of the Sn.sup.2 + substituted product, LZ-252, with the starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite, is shown in the following Table L.
TABLE L______________________________________Summary of the Chemical Analyses and Propertiesof LZ-252 with the Starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite. Starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ Example 10 mordenite (LZ-252)______________________________________Chemical Analyses:Na.sub.2 O, wt. % 0.54 --(NH.sub.4).sub.2 O, wt. % -- 2.03Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % 10.17 5.18SnO, wt. % -- 12.27SiO.sub.2, wt. % 88.01 80.29F.sub.2, wt. % -- 0.10SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 14.69 26.31SiO.sub.2 /[Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 + SnO/2] 14.69 13.87M.sup.+ /Al 0.09 0.77X-Ray Crystallinity:% by Area 100 65% by Intensity 100 65Framework Infrared:Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1080 1082Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 788 804Hydroxyl Region Infrared:Absorb. @ 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.442 0.298Defect Factor, z: 0.188 0.126McBain Absorption Values:wt. % O.sub.2 @ 100 torr 18.68 14.99and 90K:wt. % H.sub.2 O @ 4.6 torr 15.68 11.29and 25.degree. C.:wt. % neopentane @ 5.96 1.43500 torr & 25.degree. C.:wt. % SF.sub.6 @ 400 torr 10.59 3.63and 25.degree. C.______________________________________
EXAMPLE 11
Example 11 discloses the substitution of Sn.sup.2 + in the framework of zeolite LZ-202 and the resulting product was designated LZ-253.
LZ-202 is an omega type zeolite, possessing structure and properties similar to zeolite omega, but synthesized in an organic-free medium. Twenty-five gm (anhydrous weight) of ammonium exchanged LZ-202 containing 91.70 millimoles of Al were slurried in 200 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. A second solution containing 45.85 millimoles NH.sub.4 SnF.sub.3 in 100 ml distilled water was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 5 ml every 5 minutes. Following the addition of the tin solution, the temperature was raised to 95.degree. C. and the slurry was digested for 3 hours at 95.degree. C. The product was filtered, washed free of soluble fluoride with hot distilled water, dried and characterized. The product contained 15.6 weight percent SnO and showed reduced X-ray crystallinity. McBain adsorption values indicate retention of at least 90 percent of the void volume showing that the reduced X-ray crystallinity is probably due to scatter caused by incorporation of the heavier tin atom into the framework structure of the zeolite. SEM and EDAX analyses were conducted and are reported in Example 13. The molecular sieves denominated herein as LZ-253 have the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite LZ-202 as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings as set forth in Table M.
TABLE M______________________________________LZ-252 Sn.sup.2+ Substituted Zeolite LZ-202D(A) Relative Intensity______________________________________15.4-15.8 m8.9-9.3 vs7.6-8.0 s6.6-7.0 s5.7-6.1 s4.6-4.8 m3.7-3.9 s3.6-3.8 s3.5-3.7 m3.4-3.6 s3.05-3.25 s2.98-3.18 s2.92-3.12 m2.81-3.01 s______________________________________
A comparison of the Sn.sup.2 + substituted product, zeolite LZ-253, with the starting NH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite LZ-202 is shown in the following Table N.
TABLE N______________________________________Summary of the Chemical Analyses and Propertiesof LZ-253 with the Starting NH.sub.4 zeolite LZ-202. Starting Example 11 NH.sub.4 -LZ-202 (LZ-253)______________________________________Chemical Analyses:Na.sub.2 O, wt. % <0.02 --(NH.sub.4).sub.2 O, wt. % 8.78 6.67Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % 18.70 13.66SnO, wt. % -- 15.63SiO.sub.2, wt. % 72.98 62.51F.sub.2, wt. % -- 0.11SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 6.62 7.77SiO.sub.2 /[Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 + SnO/2] 6.62 5.42M.sup.+ /Al 0.92 0.96X-Ray Crystallinity:% by Area 100 41% by Intensity 100 41Framework Infrared:Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1038 1042Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 816 815Hydroxyl Region Infrared:Absorb. @ 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.114 0.133Defect Factor, z: 0.048 0.056McBain Absorption Values:wt. % O.sub.2 @ 100 torr 18.18 15.99and 90K:wt. % H.sub.2 O @ 4.6 torr 18.48 16.40and 25.degree. C.:wt. % neopentane @ 1.50 1.40500 torr & 25.degree. C.:wt. % SF.sub.6 @ 400 torr -- --and 25.degree. C.______________________________________
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting NH.sub.4 -LZ-202 and the LZ-253 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting NH.sub.4 -LZ-202:(Al.sub.0.221 Si.sub.0.731 0.048)O.sub.2 LZ-253 Product: (Al.sub.0.177 Sn.sub.0.077 Si.sub.0.690 0.056)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N: 0.044
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 20
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : -0.008
(e) Moles of chromium Substituted per Mole of Aluminum Removed, c/N: 1.75
EXAMPLE 12
Example 12 discloses the substitution of Sn.sup.2 + in the framework of zeolite L and the resulting product was designated LZ-254.
Twenty-five gm (anhydrous weight) of ammonium exchanged zeolite L, NH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite L, containing 95.25 millimoles of Al were slurried in 200 ml distilled water heated at 75.degree. C. 90 ml of a second solution containing 47.62 millimoles NH.sub.4 SnF.sub.3 in distilled water was added incrementally to the zeolite slurry at a rate of 5 ml every 5 minutes. Following the addition of the tin solution, the temperature was raised to 95.degree. C. and the slurry was digested for 3 hours at 95.degree. C. The product was filtered and washed free of soluble fluoride. All of the filtrates were colorless. The solid product was yellow, contained 13.9 weight percent SnO and showed fair retention of X-ray crystallinity and excellent retention of McBain adsorption capacities. The molecular sieves denominated herein as LZ-254 have the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite L as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings as set forth in Table O.
TABLE O______________________________________LZ-254 Sn.sup.2+ Substituted Zeolite LD(A) Relative Intensity______________________________________15.6-16.0 vs5.9-6.1 s5.7-5.9 m4.5-4.7 s4.3-4.5 m4.2-4.4 m3.8-4.0 s3.56-3.76 s3.38-3.58 s3.18-3.38 m3.08-3.28 s2.97-3.17 s2.81-3.01 s______________________________________
The framework mole fractions of oxides are set forth below for the starting NH.sub.4 L and the LZ-254 product.
(a) Mole fractions of oxides (TO.sub.2): Starting NH.sub.4 L: (Al.sub.0.248 Si.sub.0.732 0.020)O.sub.2 LZ-254 Product: (Al0.210Sn.sub.0.072 Si.sub.0.685 0.033)O.sub.2
(b) Mole Fraction of Aluminum Removed, N: 0.038
(c) Percent of Aluminum Removed, N/a X 100: 15
(d) Change in Defect Structure Factor, .DELTA..sub.z : 0.013
(e) Moles of chromium Substituted per Mole of Aluminum Removed, c/N: 1.89
A comparison of the Sn.sup.2+ substituted product, LZ-254, with the starting NH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite L is shown in the following Table P.
TABLE P______________________________________Summary of the Chemical Analyses and Propertiesof LZ-254 with the Starting NH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite LZ. Starting Example 12 NH.sub.4.sup.+ L (LZ-254)______________________________________Chemical Analyses:K.sub.2 O, wt. % 3.51 2.72(NH.sub.4).sub.2 O, wt. % 7.89 6.09Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % 19.42 15.54SnO, wt. % -- 13.91SiO.sub.2, wt. % 67.80 59.67F.sub.2, wt. % -- 0.08SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 5.92 6.52SiO.sub.2 /[Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 + SnO/2] 5.92 4.87M.sup.+ /Al 1.00 0.93X-Ray Crystallinity:% by Area 100 48% by Intensity 100 49Framework Infrared:Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1028 1029Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 768 770Hydroxyl Region Infrared:Absorb. @ 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.048 0.078Defect Factor, z: 0.020 0.033McBain Absorption Values:wt. % O.sub.2 @ 100 torr 16.14 15.64and 90K:wt. % H.sub.2 O @ 4.6 torr 17.97 15.15and 25.degree. C.:wt. % neopentane @ -- 4.21500 torr & 25.degree. C.:wt. % SF.sub.6 @ 400 torr -- --and 25.degree. C.______________________________________
EXAMPLE 13
The products of Example 10 (Sn.sup.2+ substituted mordenite) and of Example 11 (Sn.sup.2+ substituted zeolite LZ-202) were examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy and EDAX techniques. The LZ-252, Sn substituted mordenite, samples were examined with only carbon coating. The SEM analyses clearly show clean crystals with mordenite morphology. There is no evidence of any other phase present with the zeolite that could be construed as SnO or other tin containing material. EDAX analyses were conducted on the entire area and on a spot on a zeolite crystal. The similarity between the EDAX area scan and spot probe analyses indicate that the Sn is equally distributed over the entire zeolite and not found in isolated areas of the zeolite. Since the X-ray powder patterns did not show the presence of any extraneous crystalline phase, the SEM and EDAX are taken as supportive evidence for substitution of Sn for Al in the zeolite framework of mordenite. Further, the analytical evaluations derived from the EDAX analyses, which are compared to the chemical analysis of the elements in the product in the following Table, confirm the even distribution of the tin over the entire sample.
TABLE Q______________________________________ Chemical EDAX EDAX Analysis Area Scan Spot Probe*______________________________________Wt. % Al: 5.37 5.1 5.6Wt. % Si: 73.47 74.2 70.8Wt. % Sn: 21.17 20.7 23.7______________________________________ *Average of (4) spots on (4) separate crystals.
SEM and EDAX analyses of the LZ-253, Sn substituted NH.sub.4 .sup.+ zeolite LZ-202 samples were also conducted. The crystals were observed to be clean and free of any debris. The crystal morphology had the appearance of the untreated NH.sub.4.sup.+ zeolite LZ-202. There was no apparent crystal degradation. A typical spot probe analysis of the crystals showed the expected level of tin in the sample. An EDAX area scan covering an entire clump of crystals showed the expected tin levels. These crystals are most probably SnO, since the X-ray powder pattern had shown a trace amount of SnO in the background. The SEM and EDAX evidence is quite clear in differentiating the precipitated SnO from the LZ-253 and shows the presence of Sn in the zeolite crystals.
EXAMPLE 14
The products of Examples 6, 7, 10 and 11 were tested for n-butane cracking activity as hereinafter described and found to be active catalysts. The reactor was a cylindrical quartz tube 254 mm in length and 10.3 mm I.D. In each test the reactor was loaded with particles of the test product which were 20-40 mesh (U.S. std.) in size and in an amount of from 0.5-5 grams. The products were activated in-situ in the reactor for one hour in a stream of either flowing helium or flowing air at the temperature indicated in the following tables. The reaction feedstock was a helium-n-butane mixture containing 2 mole percent n-butane and was passed through the reactor at a rate of 50 cc/minute with the reactor temperature maintained at 500.degree. C. Analysis of the feedstock and the reactor effluent was carried out using conventional gas chromatography techniques. The reactor effluent was analyzed after 10 minutes of on-stream operation. From the analytical data the pseudo-first-order rate constant (kA) was calculated. The results of those tests are shown in Tables R and S.
TABLE R______________________________________ Consumption Ex. Activation of n-butane % i-butaneProduct No. Temp. (.degree.C.) (%) in product KA*______________________________________H.sub.3 O.sup.+ -- 500, Helium 84.2 2.2 81Zeolon -- 600, Air 76.0 2.0 107LZ-249 6 500, Helium 86.3 2.0 56(Cr) 6 600, Air 49.2 3.8 39LZ-252 10 500, Helium 40.1 1.9 14(Sn) 10 600, Air 29.1 3.8 19______________________________________ *The lower the value for kA the lower the activity
TABLE S______________________________________ Consumption Ex. Activation of n-butane % i-butaneProduct No. Temp. (.degree.C.) (%) in product KA*______________________________________NH.sub.4.sup.+ -- 500, Helium 76.8 3.5 57LZ-202 -- 500, Air 82.1 4.1 71LZ-250 7 500, Helium 93.8 1.2 40(Cr) 7 500, Air 33.9 5.3 24LZ-253 11 500, Helium 47.1 2.3 14(Sn) 11 500, Air 74.5 2.7 52______________________________________ *The lower the value for kA the lower the activity
EXAMPLE 15
The products of Examples 3, 8, 9 and 12 were tested for n-butane cracking activity as described in Example 14 and found to be active catalysts. The results of those tests are shown in Tables T and U.
TABLE T______________________________________ Consumption Ex. Activation of n-butane % i-butaneProduct No. Temp. (.degree.C.) (%) in product KA*______________________________________NH.sub.4.sup.+ -- 500, Helium -- -- 2Zeolite Y -- 600, Air -- 6.6 1LZ-239 3 500, Helium 33.6 4.5 24(Cr) 3 500, Air 11.5 -- 6LZ-238 9 500, Helium 10.8 1.2 7(Sn) 9 500, Air 13.2 1.1 7______________________________________ *The lower the value for kA the lower the activity
TABLE U______________________________________ Consumption Ex. Activation of n-butane % i-butaneProduct No. Temp. (.degree.C.) (%) in product KA*______________________________________NH.sub.4.sup.+ -- 500, Helium -- 6.5 3.4Zeolite L -- 500, Air -- 6.7 4.6LZ-251 8 500, Helium 12.7 5.6 8.1(Cr)LZ-254 12 500, Helium 36.4 9.4 25.0(Sn)______________________________________ *The lower the value for kA the lower the activity
EXAMPLE 16
Twenty five gm. H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite, containing 0.0249 moles Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, was slurried in 250 ml distilled water and heated at 75.degree. C. A 100 ml. solution containing 0.0499 moles of NH.sub.4 SnF.sub.3 in water was added in 5 ml. increments every 5 minutes. The amount of Sn.sup.+2 added was sufficient to remove and replace 100% of the framework aluminum in the zeolite. The initial pH of the H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite was 4.11, which dropped to 3.56 during the addition of the NH.sub.4 SnF.sub.3 solution, and was 3.59 at the end of the addition. Following the addition, the slurry was digested at 95.degree. C. for 3 hours, filtered and washed free of soluble aluminum species and fluoride. The pH at the end of the digestion was 3.68. The resulting product was colorless and contained 12.28 wt. % SnO; the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was 26.3, (the starting ratio of the H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite was 14.7). The product properties are compared to the starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite in the following Table V:
TABLE V______________________________________ Starting LZ-252 H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite Product______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 14.69 26.31Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al: 0.09 0.77Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /(Al + 0.09 0.272Sn):wt. % Sn.sup.+2 as SnO: 0 12.28wt. % fluoride: 0 0.11X-ray Crystallinity, %: 100 65Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1080 1080Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 798 804McBain O.sub.2, wt. %: 19.0 15.0McBain H.sub.2 O, wt. %: 14.8 11.3McBain neopentane, wt. %: 4.4 1.4McBain SF.sub.6, wt. %: 9.1 3.6______________________________________
The data in the above Table indicate that Sn.sup.+2 has substituted into the zeolite framework, but there has been some loss in crystallinity as evidenced by the reduced adsorption capacities. Two samples of the Sn.sup.+2 substituted sample described above were treated in the following manner. One sample was treated in 3.5M NaCl solution at 75.degree. C. for two hours, filtered, washed and analyzed. The second sample was placed into 3.5M NaCl solution and titrated to pH 10 with 0.1N NaOH solution, filtered, washed and analyzed. The chemical analysis data for the two samples are shown below:
______________________________________ NaCl Treated Titrated with NaOH______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 23.87 24.96Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al: 1.62 1.64Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ / 0.76 0.58(Al + 2Sn):______________________________________
Ion exchange of the Sn.sup.+2 substituted mordenite shows a substantial excess in cations relative to the amount of aluminum contained in the framework. This indicates that an additional species in the framework is negatively charged, thus requiring a cation. The only probable species is Sn.sup.+2 in the framework.
EXAMPLE 17
Fifty gm. H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite, containing 0.0457 moles Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, was slurried in 500 ml distilled water and heated at 75.degree. C. A 200 ml. solution containing 0.0913 moles of SnF.sub.2 and 0.0913 moles NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 in water was added continuously at a rate of 2 ml. per minute. The amount of Sn.sup.+2 added was sufficient to remove and replace 100% of the framework aluminum in the zeolite. The initial pH of the H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite was 1.84, which increased to 2.77 at the end of the addition of the SnF.sub.2 solution. Following the addition, the slurry was digested at 95.degree. C. for 3 hours, filtered and washed free of soluble aluminum species and fluoride. The pH at the end of the digestion was 2.66. The resulting product was colorless and contained 6.39 wt. % SnO; the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was 30.9, (the starting ratio of the H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite was 16.4). The product properties are compared to the starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite in the following Table W:
TABLE W______________________________________ Starting LZ-252 H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite Product______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 16.45 30.93Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al: 0.08 0.73Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /(Al + 0.08 0.462Sn):wt. % Sn.sup.+2 as SnO: 0 6.39wt. % fluoride: 0 0.07X-ray Crystallinity, %: 100 88Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1082 1094Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 797 810Absorbance at 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.403 0.218"z" value: 0.171 0.093McBain O.sub.2, wt. %: 19.6 16.4McBain H.sub.2 O, wt. %: 15.2 10.1McBain neopentane, wt. %: 5.2 1.2McBain SF.sub.6, wt. %: 11.4 0.6______________________________________
The data in the above Table indicate that Sn.sup.+2 has substituted into the zeolite framework, but there has been some apparent loss in crystallinity as evidenced by the reduced adsorption capacities. However, the X-ray crystallinity value for the substituted product remains high and the amount of defects in the structure are reduced compared to the starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite.
Four samples of the Sn.sup.+2 substituted sample described above were treated in the following manner. One sample was titrated with 0.1N NaOH solution, filtered, washed and analyzed. A second sample was placed into 3.5M NH.sub.4 Cl solution, filtered, washed and analyzed. A third sample was treated at pH 9.0 with NH.sub.4 OH solution, filtered, washed and analyzed. A final sample was treated in 3.5M CaCl.sub.2 solution, filtered, washed and analyzed. The chemical analysis data for the four samples are shown below:
______________________________________Treatment: NaOH NH.sub.4 Cl NH.sub.4 OH CaCl.sub.2______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 31.30 32.27 30.32 33.01Cat. Eq., M.sup.+ /Al: 1.73 1.05 1.12 0.89Cat. Eq., M.sup.+ /(Al + 2Sn): 0.89 0.62 0.62 0.44______________________________________
Ion exchange of the Sn.sup.+2 substituted mordenite shows a substantial excess in cations relative to the amount of aluminum contained in the framework; particularly for the NaOH treated sample, while the Ca-exchanged sample did not exchange well. The increased ion exchange capacity indicates that Sn.sup.+2 in the framework also requires a cation. It was noticed that as the pH of the exchange is increased, the ion exchange capacity increases as well. This indicates that the original cations balancing the negative charges on the Sn.sup.+2 in the framework are protons. The protons are strongly held by the Sn.sup.+2, making the material weakly acidic, thus requiring the higher pH to exchange the protons.
EXAMPLE 18
Fifty nine gm. H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite, containing 0.0539 moles Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, was slurried in 500 ml distilled water and heated at 75.degree. C. A 200 ml. solution containing 0.0913 moles of SnF.sub.2 and 0.0915 moles NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 in water was added continuously at a rate of 2.5 ml. per minute. The amount of Sn.sup.+2 added was sufficient to remove and replace 85% of the framework aluminum in the zeolite. The initial pH of the H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite was 2.68, which decreased to 2.27 at the end of the addition of the SnF.sub.2 solution. Following the addition, the slurry was digested at 95.degree. C. for 3 hours, filtered and washed free of soluble aluminum species and fluoride. The resulting product was colorless and contained 6.95 wt. % SnO; the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was 31.0, (the starting ratio of the H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite was 16.4). The product properties are compared to the starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite in the following Table X:
TABLE X______________________________________ Starting LZ-252 H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite Product______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 16.45 31.93Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al: 0.08 0.68Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /(Al + 0.08 0.392Sn):wt. % Sn.sup.+2 as SnO: 0 6.95wt. % fluoride: 0 0.07X-ray Crystallinity, %: 100 83Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1082 1086Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 797 806Absorbance at 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.403 0.280"z" value: 0.171 0.119______________________________________
The data in the above Table indicate that Sn.sup.+2 has substituted into the zeolite framework. The X-ray crystallinity value for the substituted product remains high and the amount of defects in the structure are reduced compared to the starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite.
Four samples of the Sn.sup.+2 substituted sample described above were treated in the following manner. One sample was treated in 3.5M NaCl and titrated with 1.0N NaOH solution to pH 12, filtered, washed and analyzed. A second sample was placed into 3.5M KCl solution and titrated to pH 12 with 1.0 KOH, filtered, washed and analyzed. A third sample was treated at pH 10.0 with 10 N NH.sub.4 OH solution, filtered, washed and analyzed. A final sample was treated in 3.5M LaCl.sub.3 solution, filtered, washed and analyzed. The chemical analysis data for the four samples are shown below:
______________________________________Treatment: NaOH KOH NH.sub.4 OH LaCl.sub.3______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 31.03 33.92 33.36 32.40Cat. Eq., M.sup.+ /Al: 1.83 2.09 1.38 0.70Cat. Eq., M.sup.+ /(Al + 2Sn): 0.89 0.92 0.62 0.31______________________________________
Ion exchange of the Sn.sup.+2 substituted mordenite shows a substantial excess in cations relative to the amount of aluminum contained in the framework; particularly for the two samples titrated to pH 12. The La-exchanged sample did not exchange well, and the NH.sub.4.sup.+ exchanged only part of the Sn.sup.+2 protons. As stated above, the increased ion exchange capacity indicates that Sn.sup.+2 in the framework also requires a cation. Increased exchange capacity with increasing pH indicates that the original cations balancing the negative charges on the Sn.sup.+2 in the framework are protons which are strongly held by the Sn.sup.+2, making the material weakly acidic.
EXAMPLE 19
Five gm. H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite, containing 0.0062 moles Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, was slurried in 100 ml distilled water and heated at 75.degree. C. A 50 ml. solution containing 0.0061 moles of SnF.sub.4 and 0.0061 moles of NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 in water was added in 5 ml. increments every 5 minutes. The amount of Sn.sup.+4 added was sufficient to remove and replace 50% of the framework aluminum in the zeolite. The initial pH of the H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite was 2.09, which dropped to 1.98 during the addition of the SnF.sub.4 solution, but was 2.1 at the end of the addition. Following the addition, the slurry was digested at 75.degree. C. for 1 hour, filtered and washed free of soluble aluminum species and fluoride. The resulting product contained 16.34 wt. % SnO.sub.2 ; the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was 34.8, (the starting ratio of the H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite was 11.7); there was a small decrease in absorbance in the hydroxyl region of the infrared spectrum measured at 3710 cm.sup.-1 attributed to hydrogen bonded OH groups in dealuminated sites. The data indicate substitution of Sn.sup.+4 in framework tetrahedral sites. Comparison of the product properties with the starting H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite is shown in the following Table Y:
TABLE Y______________________________________ Starting LZ-252 H.sub.3 O.sup.+ mordenite Product______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 11.67 34.82Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al: 0.06 0.56wt. % Sn.sup.+4 : 0 16.34wt. % fluoride: 0 0.24X-ray Crystallinity, %: 100 62Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1069 1084Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 796 810Absorbance at 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.203 0.172"z" value: 0.086 0.073McBain O.sub.2, wt. %: 19.7 171McBain H.sub.2 O, wt. %: 16.3 9.5McBain neopentane, wt. %: 6.1 3.3McBain SF.sub.6, wt. %: 12.3 7.9______________________________________
The data in the above Table indicate that Sn.sup.+4 has substituted into the zeolite framework, but there has been some loss in crystallinity as evidenced by the reduced adsorption capacities.
EXAMPLE 20
Ten gm. NH.sub.4 Y, containing 0.0215 moles of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was slurried in 100 ml distilled H.sub.2 O and heated at 75.degree. C. A 25 ml. solution containing 0.0108 moles of SnF.sub.4 and 0.0107 moles of NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 in water was added in 1.4 ml. increments approximately every 5 minutes. The amount of Sn.sup.+4 added was sufficient to remove and replace 25% of the framework aluminum in the zeolite. The initial pH of the slurry at 75.degree. C. was 4.35, which decreased to 4.21 during the addition and was 4.54 at the end of the addition. Following the addition, the slurry was digested for three hours at 95.degree. C., filtered and washed free of soluble aluminum species and fluoride. The resulting product contained 14.56 wt. % SnO.sub.2 ; the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was 7.16 (the starting ratio of the NH.sub.4 Y was 5.09). There was substitution of Sn.sup.+4 and the sample was approximately 28% dealuminated. Comparison of the properties of the product zeolite with the starting NH.sub.4 Y is shown in the following Table Z:
TABLE Z______________________________________ Starting NH.sub.4 Y Product Zeolite______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 5.09 7.16Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al: 1.05 0.99wt. % SnO.sub.2 : 0 14.56wt. % fluoride: 0 0.14X-ray Crystallinity, %: 100 40Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1020 1032Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 786 791Absorbance at 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.038 0.124"z" value: 0.016 0.053McBain O.sub.2, wt. %: 32.1 23.5McBain H.sub.2 O, wt. %: 29.4 22.1McBain neopentane, wt. %: -- 10.2McBain SF.sub.6, wt. %: -- 17.5n-butane cracking, k.sub.A : 1.9 2.0______________________________________
The data indicate that Sn.sup.+4 is substituted into the tetrahedral sites in the framework. The low k.sub.A value for the product in butane cracking is consistent with this conclusion, since SnO.sub.2 deposited in the pores of the zeolite would show severe cracking activity due to presence of accessible Sn ions.
EXAMPLE 21
Five gm. NH.sub.4 -L zeolite, containing 0.0095 moles Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, was slurried in 100 ml distilled water and heated at 75.degree. C. A 50 ml. solution containing 0.0095 moles of SnF.sub.4 and 0.0095 moles of NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 in water was added in 5 ml. increments every 5 minutes. The amount of Sn.sup.+4 added was sufficient to remove and replace 50% of the framework aluminum in the zeolite. The initial pH of the NH.sub.4 -L slurry was 6.55, which dropped to 2.38 during the addition of the SnF.sub.4 solution, and was 2.38 at the end of the addition. Following the addition, the slurry was digested at 75.degree. C. for 1 hour, filtered and washed free of soluble aluminum species and fluoride. The pH at the end of the digestion was 2.93. The resulting product contained 17.04 wt. % Sn measured as SnO.sub.2 ; the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was 8.45, (the starting ratio of the NH.sub.4 -L was 5.92). There was an increase in absorbance in the hydroxyl region of the infrared spectrum measured at 3710 cm.sup.-1 attributed to hydrogen bonded OH groups in dealuminated sites. However, the measured amount of defects in the structure were insufficient to account for the amount of dealumination. The data indicate substitution of Sn.sup.+4 in framework tetrahedral sites. Comparison of the product properties with the starting NH.sub.4 -L is shown in the following Table A1:
TABLE A1______________________________________ Starting NH.sub.4 -L LZ-273 Product______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 5.92 8.45Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al: 0.99 1.00wt. % Sn.sup.+4 : 0 17.04wt. % fluoride: 0 0.34X-ray Crystallinity, %: 100 40Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1028 1032Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 770 771Absorbance at 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.078 0.220"z" value: 0.033 0.093McBain O.sub.2, wt. %: 16.2 16.6McBain H.sub.2 O, wt. %: 18.0 15.3McBain neopentane, wt. %: -- 7.9McBain SF.sub.6, wt. %: -- 11.8n-butane cracking, k.sub.A : 1.3 2.9______________________________________
The data in the above Table indicate that Sn.sup.+4 has substituted into the zeolite framework. Loss of structure as evidenced by the reduced X-ray crystallinity values can be explained by the incorporation of the larger Sn.sup.+4 ion into the zeolite framework and by fluorescence of that ion. A more accurate indication of crystal retention is evidenced by the retention of adsorption capacities, which show that both void volume and pore size have been maintained, despite incorporation of 17 wt. % of SnO.sub.2 into the zeolite. The n-butane cracking activity value, k.sub.A has also increased.
EXAMPLE 22
Ten gin. NH.sub.4 L, containing 0.0190 moles of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was slurried in 100 ml distilled H.sub.2 O and heated at 75.degree. C. A 25 ml. solution containing 0.0025 moles of SnF.sub.4 and 0.0025 moles of NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 in water was added in 1 ml. increments every 5 minutes. The amount of Sn.sup.+4 added was sufficient to remove and replace 7% of the framework aluminum in the zeolite. The initial pH of the slurry at 75.degree. C. was 5.73, which decreased to 2.98 during the addition and was 2.98 at the end of the addition. Following the addition, the slurry was digested for 1 hour at 75.degree. C., filtered and washed free of soluble aluminum species and fluoride. The resulting product contained 3.44 wt. % Sn measured as SnO.sub.2 ; the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was 6.95 (the starting ratio of the NH.sub.4 L was 5.92). Comparison of the properties of the product zeolite with the starting NH.sub.4 L is shown in the following Table A2:
TABLE A2______________________________________ Starting NH.sub.4 -L LZ-273 Product______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 5.92 6.95Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al: 0.99 0.95wt. % SnO.sub.2 : 0 3.44wt. % fluoride: 0 0.05X-ray Crystallinity, %: 100 91Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1028 1029Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 770 769Absorbance at 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.078 0.080"z" value: 0.033 0.034McBain O.sub.2, wt. %: 16.2 17.2McBain H.sub.2 O, wt. %: 18.0 17.1McBain neopentane, wt. %: -- 2.7McBain SF.sub.6, wt. %: -- 4.3n-butane cracking, k.sub.A : 1.3 2.7______________________________________
The data indicate that Sn.sup.+4 is substituted into the tetrahedral sites in the framework.
EXAMPLE 23
250 gm. NH.sub.4 -L zeolite, containing 0.4455 moles Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, was slurried in 2.5 liters distilled water and heated at 75.degree. C. A 250 ml. solution containing 0.0632 moles of SnF.sub.4 and 0.0633 moles of NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 in water was added at a constant rate of 5 ml. every 5 minutes by means of a peristaltic pump. The amount of Sn.sup.+4 added was sufficient to remove and replace 7% of the framework aluminum in the zeolite. The initial pH of the NH.sub.4 -L slurry was 7.93. Following addition of the SnF.sub.4 solution, the pH was 3.59. The slurry was digested at 75.degree. C. for 1 hour, filtered and o washed free of soluble aluminum species and fluoride. The pH at the end of the digestion was 3.75. The resulting product contained 3.19 wt. % Sn measured as SnO.sub.2 ; the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was 6.95, (the starting ratio of the NH.sub.4 -L was 6.74). There was a small increase in absorbance in the hydroxyl region of the infrared spectrum measured at 3710 cm.sup.-1 attributed to hydrogen bonded OH groups in dealuminated sites. However, the measured amount of defects in the structure were insufficient to account for the amount of dealumination. The data indicate substitution of Sn.sup.+4 in framework tetrahedral sites. Comparison of the product properties with the starting NH.sub.4 -L is shown in the following Table A3:
TABLE A3______________________________________ Starting NH.sub.4 -L LZ-273 Product______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 6.74 6.95Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al: 0.98 0.95wt. % Sn.sup.+4 : 0 3.19wt. % fluoride: 0 0.08X-ray Crystallinity, %: 100 84Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1033 1032Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 772 773Absorbance at 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.058 0.082"z" value: 0.025 0.035McBain O.sub.2, wt. %: 16.4 16.5McBain H.sub.2 O, wt. %: 17.1 16.2McBain neopentane, wt. %: 6.3 6.7McBain SF.sub.6, wt. %: 13.8 13.3n-butane cracking, k.sub.A : 3.4 3.6______________________________________
The data in the above Table indicate that Sn.sup.+4 has substituted into the zeolite framework.
EXAMPLE 24
250 gm. NH.sub.4 -L zeolite, containing 0.4455 moles Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, was slurried in 2.5 liters distilled water and heated at 75.degree. C. A 250 ml. solution containing 0.0105 moles of SnF.sub.4 and 0.0106 moles of NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 in water was added at a constant rate of 1.4 ml. every 5 minutes by means of a peristaltic pump. The amount of Sn.sup.+4 added was sufficient to remove and replace 1.2% of the framework aluminum in the zeolite. The initial pH of the NH.sub.4 -L slurry was 7.98. Following addition of the SnF.sub.4 solution, the pH was 4.12. The slurry was digested at 75.degree. C. for 1 hour, filtered and washed free of soluble aluminum species and fluoride. The pH at the end of the digestion was 4.49. The resulting product contained 0.78 wt. % Sn measured as SnO.sub.2 ; the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was 6.56, (the starting ratio of the NH.sub.4 -L was 6.74). There was no change in absorbance in the hydroxyl region of the infrared spectrum measured at 3710 cm.sup.-1 attributed to hydrogen bonded OH groups in dealuminated sites. The data indicate substitution of Sn.sup.+4 in framework tetrahedral sites. Comparison of the product properties with the starting NH.sub.4 -L is shown in the following Table A4:
TABLE A4______________________________________ Starting NH.sub.4 -L LZ-273 Product______________________________________SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 6.74 6.56Cation Equivalent, M.sup.+ /Al: 0.98 0.93wt. % Sn.sup.+4 : 0 0.78wt. % fluoride: 0 0.01X-ray Crystallinity, %: 100 93Asym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 1033 1002Sym. Stretch, cm.sup.-1 : 772 774Absorbance at 3710 cm.sup.-1 : 0.058 0.058"z" value: 0.025 0.025McBain O.sub.2, wt. %: 16.4 16.8McBain H.sub.2 O, wt. %: 17.1 17.0McBain neopentane, wt. %: 6.3 6.6McBain SF.sub.6, wt. %: 13.8 13.6n-butane cracking, k.sub.A : 3.4 2.8______________________________________
The data in the above Table indicate that Sn.sup.+4 has substituted into the zeolite framework.
EXAMPLE 25
This is a comparative example which reproduces Example 1 of Canadian Patent 1,127,134. Solution 1 containing 48 g of sodium silicate and 60 g of distilled water was prepared in a 250 mL, 3-necked, round bottomed flask. The flask was equipped with an electric stirrer and placed in a heating mantle with a temperature controller. A second solution (solution 2) was prepared by placing 82 g of water into a 150 mL beaker and then adding to the water 6 g of tetrapropyl ammonium bromide, 4 g of concentrated sulfuric acid and 2.45 g of potassium chromium sulfate (CrK(SO.sub.4).sub.2.12H.sub.2 O and 0.02 g of H-ZSM-5 seed. Upon addition of the potassium chromium sulfate, the solution turned dark blue.
Solution 2 was added to solution I with stirring resulting in a greenish-blue gelatinous and thick mixture. Stirring was increased until the mixture began to thin. At this point the mixture or slurry was heated to 96.degree. C. which thinned out the slurry further. The slurry was stirred at 96.degree. C. for 6 days. During this time, the slurry became green and finally a chalky green in color. After 6 days, the slurry was centrifuged to separate the solids and liquid. After the liquid was decanted, the solids were washed by mixing with distilled water and then centrifuged again. A total of 1,000 mL of water were used to wash the solids.
It was observed that after centrifugation, the solid product consisted of two distinct layers. The smaller top layer was dark green while the larger layer was light green in color. The upper layer readily dispersed in the wash water. After the last wash, the dark green layer was separated from the bottom layer by rinsing with a small amount of additional distilled water and the solids collected (Product A). The other, light green fraction of the sample was labeled Product B. Both solid products were dried in an air-purged oven at 70.degree. C. for 16 hours. The major fraction of Product B was further calcined in a muffle furnace at 500.degree. C. for 12 hours and cooled. It was labeled Product C. Following the calcination, the light green color became light yellow.
The respective Products had the following properties.
______________________________________ Product A Product B Product CColor Dark Green Light Green Light Yellow______________________________________X-ray Crystallinity, 54 90 >100% ZSM-5 Relativeto a StandardChemical Analyses(TPA).sub.2 O, wt. % 7.86 10.84 0.00Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % 14.25 0.59 0.66SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 260.0 321.6 316.0Ratios:(TPA).sub.2 O/Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 4.2 6.2 0.0(Na.sub.2 O/Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 9.5 5.1 4.8K.sub.2 O/Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.7 0.2 0.2Cation Equivalents:M+/Al 14.4 11.5 5.0M+/Al +Cr 0.7 6.2 2.8______________________________________
The dark green material, Product A, contained most of the chromium. If solids separation had been effected by filtration instead of by centrifugation, it would have been homogeneously blended with the bulk of the sample and would not have been easily identified. On drying it became a chunky mass. Besides chromium oxide, product A contains the major fraction of the potassium and sodium, and also contains a greater aluminum content. This is consistent with precipitation of hydrolyzed chromium species due to the high pH of the synthesis gel. On dehydration, the mass coalesces into a glue like material, causing the formation of the chunky mass.
All three products were examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy, (SEM). Product A showed small crystals of ZSM-5 packed together inside an amorphous mass. The amorphous mass was mostly chromium oxide while the zeolite crystals showed very little chromium oxide. The presence of the chromium oxide can be explained solely by the adherence of chromium oxide particles on the surface of the crystals.
Product B and Product C were similar to Product A in that larger crystals of ZSM-5 were found and a few showed some nondescript or amorphous particles adhering to the outside surface of the zeolite crystals. The amorphous particles contained high levels of chromium. The zeolite crystals were almost chromium free, with the chromium found mostly on or at the surface of the crystals.
All three products were examined by Analytical Transmission Electron Microscopy dry-brush techniques, (ATEM), with thin sections of both Products B and C also examined by the microtome technique. The dry-brush samples confirmed the findings of the SEM examination. Chromium was detected in amorphous masses outside the zeolite crystals. When the clean surfaces of the zeolite crystals were examined, only very trace quantities of chromium were detected. Examination of the thin sections of Product B, the light green material that had been dried only, did not show any detectable chromium in the interior portions of the zeolite crystals. However, trace levels of chromium were detected in the calcined material, Product C. The only explanation for the trace amounts of chromium is that the chromium was present with the template during synthesis. Thus, it was included inside the zeolite channels and not in the framework. This quantity of chromium is too low to detect by ATEM (2300 ppm), but upon calcination, the template is removed and the chromium agglomerates, thereby making it barely detectable by ATEM.
The only conclusion that can be drawn from the SEM and ATEM analysis is that chromium was not incorporated into the ZSM-5 framework. This is exactly what one would expect based on the high pH of the synthesis gel. The bulk of the chromium is precipitated as a hydrolyzed species which adheres to the outside surface of the zeolite crystals. On drying or calcining, the chrome agglomerates into amorphous particles that continue to adhere to the outside surface of the zeolite crystals. The barely detectable chromium found on the inside of the zeolite crystals are present as occluded chromium owing to the chromium being associated with the templating agent during synthesis. There was no evidence of tetrahedral chromium in the framework.
EXAMPLE 26
This example presents the preparation of a chromium and a non-chromium EU-7 per the procedure of U.S. Pat. No. 4,581,212 (Araya).
A. Synthesis of EU-7.
To 99.9 of a 50% (wt) solution of cesium hydroxide in water there was added 44.98 gm of distilled water. To this solution there were added 3.15 gm alumina trihydrate (35.34% H.sub.2 O, 64.68% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3) and the mixture was gently heated. In a 4 liter beaker 76.87 gm of M-5 Grade Cab-O-Sil were slurried in 899.7 gm distilled water and mixed for 5 minutes. To this slurry 24.04 gm of ethylenediamine were added.
The aluminate solution was slowly added to the silicate slurry; the residue of the aluminate solution was rinsed into the silicate slurry with an additional 76.98 gm distilled water and mixed well for 10 minutes to give a reaction mixture having the following ratios:
60.0 SiO.sub.2 : Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 8.3 Cs.sub.2 O: 20.0 Organic: 3000 H2O.
The slurry was poured into a 2-liter Parr bomb equipped with a stirring head with mixing begun at 300 RPM. The bomb was heated to 180.degree. C. for 58 hours, cooled to room temperature and the solid product washed. An x-ray powder pattern taken of the dried product indicated that EU-7 was prepared in this synthesis.
B. Synthesis of Cr containing EU-7.
The procedure outlined above was used with the following modifications: Instead of 3.15 g of alumina hydrate, there were added 1.5 g of alumina hydrate and 1.52 g of Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3. It was noted that upon addition of the Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3, the solution became dark green and cloudy.
The reaction mixture had the following ratio of oxides:
60 SiO.sub.2 : 0.5 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 0.5 Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 8.3 Cs.sub.2 O: 20 Organic: 3000 H.sub.2 O.
This reaction mixture has the same ratio of reactants as in part A since the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 +Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 =Y.sub.2 O.sub.3. This mixture was poured into a 2-liter Parr bomb, stirred at 300 RPM at a temperature of 180.degree. C. for 76 hours, cooled to room temperature and the solid product washed. The product was light green in color. The x-ray diffraction pattern was that of EU-7.
The sample of Cr-EU-7 was analyzed by wet chemical methods and the composition of the calcined product is shown below.
______________________________________ Cr-EU-7 Calcined______________________________________ Cs.sub.2 O 3.0 Organic -- Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 1.9 Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 2.8 SiO.sub.2 93.3______________________________________
The Cr-EU-7 product was examined using Analytical Transmission Electron Microscopy (ATEM) to determine the location of the chromium in the product. The results of this analysis showed that the product is composed of chromium only particles and particles containing only silicon, aluminum and cesium. All the chromium was located in a separate phase from the zeolite phase.
A portion of the Cr-containing product was calcined in air at 550.degree. C. for 16 hours and the resulting light green product was also examined by Analytical Transmission Electron Microscopy. The results were the same as those obtained with the as-synthesized sample.
EXAMPLE 27
This example shows the preparation and characterization of samples prepared as per U.S. Pat. No. 4,420,467 (Whittam).
To a beaker there were added 185.15 g of Grade 40 sodium silicate (clear waterglass) and 260 g of distilled water. To this solution there were added 27.23 g of pentaethythritol and the mixture stirred for 11/2 hours.
In a separate beaker 270.3 g of distilled water were mixed with 13.24 g of 98% sulfuric acid and 5.92 g of Al.sub.2 (SO.sub.4).sub.3.17H.sub.2 O. This solution was added to the silicate slurry with vigorous stirring. The resultant viscous gel had the following compositions.
89 SiO.sub.2 : Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 23.9 Na.sub.2 O: 20 Organic: 15.9 SO.sub.4 : 3600 H.sub.2 O
The slurry was poured into a 2-liter Parr bomb equipped with a stirring head with mixing begun at 300 RPM. The bomb was heated to 180.degree. C. for 48 hours, cooled to room temperature and the solid product washed. An x-ray powder pattern taken of the dried product indicated that a well crystallized NU-5 was prepared in this synthesis.
A Cr-NU-5 was prepared as above except for the following modifications. This modification is consistent with Example 7 of U.S. Pat. No. 4,420,467. To the aluminate solution there were added 5.0 g of CrK(SO.sub.4).sub.2. 12H.sub.2 O. The solution became purple colored with all of the chromium salt dissolving. The reaction mixture had the following composition.
89 SiO.sub.2 : Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 :0.5 Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 : 23.9 Na.sub.2 O: 20 Organic: 15.9 SO.sub.4 : 3600 H.sub.2 O
The slurry was poured into a 2-liter Parr bomb equipped with a stirring head with mixing begun at 100 RPM and increased to 300 RPM. The bomb was heated to 180.degree. C. for 96 hours, cooled to room temperature and tile solid light green product was washed. An x-ray powder pattern taken of the dried product indicated that a very poorly crystallized Cr-NU-5 was prepared in this synthesis.
The sample of Cr-NU-5 was analyzed by wet chemical methods and the compositions of the as-synthesized and the calcined materials compared to the data provided in the '467 patent for NU-5 (Ex. 1 ) and the Cr containing NU-5 (Ex. 7). The following Table shows the results of the chemical analyses:
______________________________________ Patent Examples Cr-NU-5 Cr-NU-5 Ex. 1 Ex. 7 As-Syn. Calcined______________________________________K.sub.2 O 0.5 -- 2.4 2.5Na.sub.2 O -- -- 0.3 0.3Organic 13.2 -- 6.7 --Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 2.1 -- 1.7 1.8Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 -- 0.5 1.2 1.2SiO.sub.2 84.3 -- 87.6 92.6______________________________________
The Cr-NU-5 product was examined by Analytical Transmission Electron Microscopy (ATEM) to determine the location and distribution of Cr in the product. The results showed that no separate phase of chromium was observed. The concentration of Cr (by EDS) was significantly greater at the exterior surface of the zeolite particles than at the center.
A portion of the Cr-containing product was calcined in air at 550.degree. C. for 17 hours and the resulting yellow product was also examined by Analytical Electron Transmission Microscopy. The ATEM results show that Cr has essentially been eliminated from the zeolite crystals as a result of the calcination treatment. The analytical data obtained at the center of the crystal show a Si/Cr ratio of 325, approximately 1/6 the Cr present in the as-synthesized material. Wet chemical analysis show that the bulk composition of each material, the as-synthesized and the calcined products, contain the same amount of Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3. If the chromium was part of the framework structure the concentration of the chromium at the center of the crystals would have been the same before and after calcination. Since after calcination the chromium concentration is barely above the background level, the only conclusion that one can draw is that the observed chromium is not part of the zeolite framework. The chromium is, therefore, present as a separate phase which was not detected by ATEM.
The presence of Cr in the as-synthesized product can be explained by the fact that it was present as a soluble phase during the crystallization process and was trapped in the zeolite cage. During burnoff of the organic, the Cr was transported out of the crystal and agglomerated into a separate phase, probably an oxide or hydroxide species. Since the Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 content of the Cr-NU-5 was only about 1 weight percent, very small particles of Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 would not be observable in the x-ray powder pattern, and it would be observable only with great difficulty by ATEM.
Clearly neither Cr-EU-7 nor Cr-NU-5 contain chromium in the framework.
PROCESS APPLICATIONS
The molecular sieves compositions of this invention have unique surface characteristics making them useful as molecular sieves and as catalyst or as bases for catalysts in a variety of separation, hydrocarbon conversion and oxidative combustion processes. These composition can be impregnated or otherwise associated with catalytically active metals by the numerous methods known in the art and used, for example, in fabricating catalysts compositions containing alumina or aluminosilicate materials.
The instant molecular sieve compositions may be employed for separating molecular species in admixture with molecular species of a different degree of polarity or having different kinetic diameters by contacting such mixtures with a molecular sieve composition having pore diameters large enough to adsorb at least one but not all molecular species of the mixture based on the polarity of the adsorbed molecular species and/or its kinetic diameter. When the instant compositions are employed for such separation processes the compositions are at least partially activated whereby some molecular species selectively enter the intracrystalline pore system thereof.
The hydrocarbon conversion reactions which may be catalyzed by the instant molecular sieve compositions include; cracking, hydrocracking; alkylation of both the aromatic and isoparaffin types; isomerization (including xylene isomerization); polymerization; reforming; hydrogenation; dehydrogenation; transalkylation; dealkylation; and hydration.
When catalyst composition containing the instant molecular sieve compositions also contains a hydrogenation promoter, such promoter may be platinum, palladium, tungsten, nickel or molybdenum and may be used to treat various petroleum stocks including heavy petroleum residual stocks, cyclic stocks and other hydrocrackable charge stocks. These stocks can be hydrocracked at temperatures in the range of between about 400.degree. F. and about 825.degree. F. using molar ratios of hydrogen to hydrocarbon in the range of between about 2 and about 80, pressures between about 10 and about 3500 p.s.i.g., and a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of between about 0.1 and about 20, preferably between about 1.0 and about 10.
Catalyst compositions containing the instant molecular sieve compositions may also be employed in reforming processes in which the hydrocarbon feedstocks contact the catalyst at temperatures between about 700.degree. F. and about 1000.degree. F., hydrogen pressures of between about 100 and about 500 p.s.i.g., LHSV values in the range between about 0.1 and about 10 and hydrogen to hydrocarbon molar ratios in the range between about 1 and about 20, preferably between 5 about 4 and about 12.
Further, catalysts containing the instant molecular sieve compositions which also contain hydrogenation promoters, are also useful in hydroisomerization processes wherein the feedstock(s), such as normal paraffins, is converted to saturated branched-chain isomers. Hydroisomerization processes are typically carried out at a temperature between about 200.degree. F. and about 600.degree. F., preferably between about 300.degree. F. and about 550.degree. F. with an LHSV value between about 0.2 and about 1.0. Hydrogen is typically supplied to the reactor in admixture with the hydrocarbon feedstock in molar proportions of hydrogen to the feedstock of between about 1 and about 5.
Catalyst compositions similar to those employed for hydrocracking and hydroisomerization may also be employed at between about 650.degree. F. and about 1000.degree. F., preferably between about 850.degree. F. and about 950.degree. F. and usually at somewhat lower pressures within the range between about 15 and about 50 p.s.i.g. for the hydroisomerization of normal paraffins. Preferably the paraffin feedstock comprises normal paraffins having a carbon number range of C.sub.7 -C.sub.20. The contact time between the feedstock and the catalyst is generally relatively short to avoid undesirable side reactions such as olefin polymerization and paraffin cracking. LHSV values in the range between about 0.1 and about 10, preferably between about 1.0 and about 6.0 are suitable.
The low alkali metal content of the instant compositions make them particularly well suited for use in the conversion of alkylaromatic compounds, particularly for use in the catalytic disproportionation of toluene, xylene, trimethylbenzenes, tetramethylbenzenes and the like. In such disproportionation processes it has been observed that isomerization and transalkylation can also occur. The catalysts containing the instant molecular sieve compositions and employed for such processes will typically include Group VIII noble metal adjuvants alone or in conjunction with Group VI-B metals such as tungsten, molybdenum and chromium which are preferably included in such catalyst compositions in amounts between about 3 and about 15 weight-percent of the overall catalyst composition. Extraneous hydrogen can, but need not be present in the reaction zone which is maintained at a temperature between about 400 and about 750.degree. F., pressures in the range between about 100 and about 2000 p.s.i.g. and LHSV values in the range between about 0.1 and about 15.
Catalysts containing the instant molecular sieve compositions may be employed in catalytic cracking processes wherein such are preferably employed with feedstocks such as gas oils, heavy naphthas, deasphalted crude oil residues etc. with gasoline being the principal desired product. Temperature conditions are typically between about 850 and about 1100.degree. F., LHSV values between about 0.5 and about 10 pressure conditions are between about 0 p.s.i.g. and about 50 p.s.i.g.
Catalysts containing the instant molecular sieve compositions may be employed for dehydrocyclization reactions which employ paraffinic hydrocarbon feedstocks, preferably normal paraffins having more than 6 carbon atoms, to form benzene, xylenes, toluene and the like. Dehydrocyclization processes are typically carried out using reaction conditions similar to those employed for catalytic cracking. For such processes it is preferred to use a Group VIII non-noble metal cation such as cobalt and nickel in conjunction with the molecular sieve composition.
Catalysts containing the instant molecular sieve compositions may be employed in catalytic dealkylation where paraffinic side chains are cleaved from aromatic nuclei without substantially hydrogenating the ring structure at relatively high temperatures in the range between about 800.degree. F. and about 1000.degree. F. at moderate hydrogen pressures between about 300 and about 1000 p.s.i.g. with other conditions being similar to those described above for catalytic hydrocracking. Catalysts employed for catalytic dealkylation are of the same type described above in connection with catalytic dehydrocyclization. Particularly desirable dealkylation reactions contemplated herein include the conversion of methylnaphthalene to naphthalene and toluene and/or xylenes to benzene.
Catalysts containing the instant molecular sieve compositions may be used in catalytic hydrofining wherein the primary objective is to provide for the selective hydrodecomposition of organic sulfur and/or nitrogen compounds without substantially affecting hydrocarbon molecules present therewith. For this purpose it is preferred to employ the same general conditions described above for catalytic hydrocracking. The catalysts are the same typically of the same general nature as described in connection with dehydrocyclization operations. Feedstocks commonly employed for catalytic hydroforming include: gasoline fractions; kerosenes; jet fuel fractions; diesel fractions; light and heavy gas oils; deasphalted crude oil residua; and the like. The feedstock may contain up to about 5 weight-percent of sulfur and up to about 3 weight-percent of nitrogen.
Catalysts containing the instant molecular sieve compositions may be employed for isomerization processes under conditions similar to those described above for reforming although isomerization processes tend to require somewhat more acidic catalysts than those employed in reforming processes. Olefins are preferably isomerized at temperatures between about 500.degree. F. and about 900.degree. F., while paraffins, naphthenes and alkyl aromatics are isomerized at temperatures between about 700.degree. F. and about 1000.degree. F. Particularly desirable isomerization reactions contemplated herein include the conversion of n-heptane and/or n-octane to isoheptanes, iso-octanes, butane to iso-butane, methylcyclopentane to cyclohexane, meta-xylene and/or ortho-xylene to para-xylene, 1-butene to 2-butene and/or isobutene, n-hexene to isohexane, cyclohexane to methylcyclopentene etc. The preferred cation form is a combination of a molecular sieve of this invention and polyvalent metal compounds (such as sulfides) of metals of Group II-A, Group II-B and rare earth metals. For alkylation and dealkylation processes the instant molecular sieve compositions having pores of at least 5 are preferred. When employed for dealkylation of alkyl aromatics, the temperature is usually at least 350.degree. F. and ranges up to a temperature at which substantial cracking of the feedstock or conversion products occurs, generally up to about 700.degree. F. The temperature is preferably at least 450.degree. F. and not greater than the critical temperature of the compound undergoing dealkylation.
Pressure conditions are applied to retain at least the aromatic feed in the liquid state. For alkylation the temperature can be as low as 250.degree. F. but is preferably at least 350.degree. F. In alkylation of benzene, toluene and xylene, the preferred alkylation agents are olefins such as ethylene and propylene.
The molecular sieve compositions of this invention may be employed in conventional molecular sieving processes as heretofore have been carried out using aluminosilicate, aluminophosphate or other commonly employed molecular sieves. The instant compositions are preferably activated, e.g. calcined in air or nitrogen, prior to their use in a molecular sieve process.
The molecular sieve compositions of this invention are also useful as adsorbents and are capable of separating mixtures of molecular species both on the basis of molecular size (kinetic diameters) and based on the degree of polarity of the molecular species. When the separation of molecular species is based upon selective adsorption based on molecular size, the instant molecular sieve composition is chosen in view of the dimensions of its pores such that at least the smallest molecular species of the mixture can enter the intracrystalline void space while at least the largest species is excluded. When the separation is based on degree of polarity it is generally the case that the more hydrophilic molecular sieve composition will preferentially adsorb the more polar molecular species of a mixture having different degrees of polarity even though both molecular species can communicate with the pore system of the molecular sieve composition.

Number	Name	Date
4299808	Klotz	Nov 1981
4420467	Whittam	Dec 1983
4581212	Araya et al.	Apr 1986

	Number	Date
Parent	645866	Jan 1991
Parent	450931	Dec 1989
Parent	133372	Dec 1987

Hydrocarbon conversion process using a chromium substituted molecular sieve

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

US Referenced Citations (3)

Continuation in Parts (3)