Hydrocarbon gas processing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11428465
  • Patent Number
    11,428,465
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 24, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 30, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
A process and an apparatus are disclosed for a compact processing assembly to improve the recovery of C2 (or C3) and heavier hydrocarbon components from a hydrocarbon gas stream. The preferred method of separating a hydrocarbon gas stream generally includes producing at least a substantially condensed first stream and a cooled second stream, expanding both streams to lower pressure, and supplying the streams to a fractionation tower. In the process and apparatus disclosed, the tower overhead vapor is directed to an absorbing means and a heat and mass transfer means inside a processing assembly. The outlet vapor from the processing assembly is compressed to higher pressure and cooled, then a portion is substantially condensed in a heat exchange means inside the processing assembly, expanded to lower pressure, and supplied to the heat and mass transfer means to provide cooling. Condensed liquid from the absorbing means is fed to the tower.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a process and apparatus for improving the separation of a gas containing hydrocarbons. Assignees S.M.E. Products LP and Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. were parties to a joint research agreement that was in effect before the invention of this application was made. The applicants claim the benefits under Title 35, United States Code, Section 119(e) of prior U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/513,860 which was filed on Jun. 1, 2017 and prior U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/674,928 which was filed on May 22, 2018.


Ethylene, ethane, propylene, propane, and/or heavier hydrocarbons can be recovered from a variety of gases, such as natural gas, refinery gas, and synthetic gas streams obtained from other hydrocarbon materials such as coal, crude oil, naphtha, oil shale, tar sands, and lignite. Natural gas usually has a major proportion of methane and ethane, i.e., methane and ethane together comprise at least 50 mole percent of the gas. The gas also contains relatively lesser amounts of heavier hydrocarbons such as propane, butanes, pentanes, and the like, as well as hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and/or other gases.


The present invention is generally concerned with improving the recovery of ethylene, ethane, propylene, propane, and heavier hydrocarbons from such gas streams. A typical analysis of a gas stream to be processed in accordance with this invention would be, in approximate mole percent, 78.6% methane, 12.5% ethane and other C2 components, 4.9% propane and other C3 components, 0.6% iso-butane, 1.4% normal butane, and 1.1% pentanes plus, with the balance made up of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Sulfur containing gases are also sometimes present.


The historically cyclic fluctuations in the prices of both natural gas and its natural gas liquid (NGL) constituents have at times reduced the incremental value of ethane, ethylene, propane, propylene, and heavier components as liquid products. This has resulted in a demand for processes that can provide more efficient recoveries of these products, for processes that can provide efficient recoveries with lower capital investment, and for processes that can be easily adapted or adjusted to vary the recovery of a specific component over a broad range. Available processes for separating these materials include those based upon cooling and refrigeration of gas, oil absorption, and refrigerated oil absorption. Additionally, cryogenic processes have become popular because of the availability of economical equipment that produces power while simultaneously expanding and extracting heat from the gas being processed. Depending upon the pressure of the gas source, the richness (ethane, ethylene, and heavier hydrocarbons content) of the gas, and the desired end products, each of these processes or a combination thereof may be employed.


The cryogenic expansion process is now generally preferred for natural gas liquids recovery because it provides maximum simplicity with ease of startup, operating flexibility, good efficiency, safety, and good reliability. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,292,380; 4,061,481; 4,140,504; 4,157,904; 4,171,964; 4,185,978; 4,251,249; 4,278,457; 4,519,824; 4,617,039; 4,687,499; 4,689,063; 4,690,702; 4,854,955; 4,869,740; 4,889,545; 5,275,005; 5,555,748; 5,566,554; 5,568,737; 5,771,712; 5,799,507; 5,881,569; 5,890,378; 5,983,664; 6,182,469; 6,578,379; 6,712,880; 6,915,662; 7,191,617; 7,219,513; 8,590,340; 8,881,549; 8,919,148; 9,021,831; 9,021,832; 9,052,136; 9,052,137; 9,057,558; 9,068,774; 9,074,814; 9,080,810; 9,080,811; 9,476,639; 9,637,428; 9,783,470; 9,927,171; 9,933,207; and 9,939,195; reissue U.S. Pat. No. 33,408; and co-pending application Ser. Nos. 11/839,693; 12/868,993; 12/869,139; 14/714,912; 14/828,093; 15/259,891; 15/332,670; 15/332,706; 15/332,723; and 15/668,139 describe relevant processes (although the description of the present invention in some cases is based on different processing conditions than those described in the cited U.S. Patents and co-pending applications).


In a typical cryogenic expansion recovery process, a feed gas stream under pressure is cooled by heat exchange with other streams of the process and/or external sources of refrigeration such as a propane compression-refrigeration system. As the gas is cooled, liquids may be condensed and collected in one or more separators as high-pressure liquids containing some of the desired C2+ components. Depending on the richness of the gas and the amount of liquids formed, the high-pressure liquids may be expanded to a lower pressure and fractionated. The vaporization occurring during expansion of the liquids results in further cooling of the stream. Under some conditions, pre-cooling the high pressure liquids prior to the expansion may be desirable in order to further lower the temperature resulting from the expansion. The expanded stream, comprising a mixture of liquid and vapor, is fractionated in a distillation (demethanizer or deethanizer) column. In the column, the expansion cooled stream(s) is (are) distilled to separate residual methane, nitrogen, and other volatile gases as overhead vapor from the desired C2 components, C3 components, and heavier hydrocarbon components as bottom liquid product, or to separate residual methane, C2 components, nitrogen, and other volatile gases as overhead vapor from the desired C3 components and heavier hydrocarbon components as bottom liquid product.


If the feed gas is not totally condensed (typically it is not), the vapor remaining from the partial condensation can be split into two streams. One portion of the vapor is passed through a work expansion machine or engine, or an expansion valve, to a lower pressure at which additional liquids are condensed as a result of further cooling of the stream. The pressure after expansion is essentially the same as the pressure at which the distillation column is operated. The combined vapor-liquid phases resulting from the expansion are supplied as feed to the column.


The remaining portion of the vapor is cooled to substantial condensation by heat exchange with other process streams, e.g., the cold fractionation tower overhead. Some or all of the high-pressure liquid may be combined with this vapor portion prior to cooling. The resulting cooled stream is then expanded through an appropriate expansion device, such as an expansion valve, to the pressure at which the demethanizer is operated. During expansion, a portion of the liquid will vaporize, resulting in cooling of the total stream. The flash expanded stream is then supplied as top feed to the demethanizer. Typically, the vapor portion of the flash expanded stream and the demethanizer overhead vapor combine in an upper separator section in the fractionation tower as residual methane product gas. Alternatively, the cooled and expanded stream may be supplied to a separator to provide vapor and liquid streams. The vapor is combined with the tower overhead and the liquid is supplied to the column as a top column feed.


In the ideal operation of such a separation process, the residue gas leaving the process will contain substantially all of the methane in the feed gas with essentially none of the heavier hydrocarbon components, and the bottoms fraction leaving the demethanizer will contain substantially all of the heavier hydrocarbon components with essentially no methane or more volatile components. In practice, however, this ideal situation is not obtained because the conventional demethanizer is operated largely as a stripping column. The methane product of the process, therefore, typically comprises vapors leaving the top fractionation stage of the column, together with vapors not subjected to any rectification step. Considerable losses of C2, C3, and C4+ components occur because the top liquid feed contains substantial quantities of these components and heavier hydrocarbon components, resulting in corresponding equilibrium quantities of C2 components, C3 components, C4 components, and heavier hydrocarbon components in the vapors leaving the top fractionation stage of the demethanizer. The loss of these desirable components could be significantly reduced if the rising vapors could be brought into contact with a significant quantity of liquid (reflux) capable of absorbing the C2 components, C3 components, C4 components, and heavier hydrocarbon components from the vapors.


In recent years, the preferred processes for hydrocarbon separation use an upper absorber section to provide additional rectification of the rising vapors. For many of these processes, the source of the reflux stream for the upper rectification section is a recycled stream of residue gas supplied under pressure. The recycled residue gas stream is usually cooled to substantial condensation by heat exchange with other process streams, e.g., the cold fractionation tower overhead. The resulting substantially condensed stream is then expanded through an appropriate expansion device, such as an expansion valve, to the pressure at which the demethanizer is operated. During expansion, a portion of the liquid will usually vaporize, resulting in cooling of the total stream. The flash expanded stream is then supplied as top feed to the demethanizer. Typical process schemes of this type are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,889,545; 5,568,737; 5,881,569; 9,052,137; and 9,080,811 and in Mowrey, E. Ross, “Efficient, High Recovery of Liquids from Natural Gas Utilizing a High Pressure Absorber”, Proceedings of the Eighty-First Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Dallas, Tex., Mar. 11-13, 2002. Unfortunately, in addition to the additional rectification section in the demethanizer, these processes also require surplus compression capacity to provide the motive force for recycling the reflux stream to the demethanizer, adding to both the capital cost and the operating cost of facilities using these processes.


Another means of providing a reflux stream for the upper rectification section is to withdraw a distillation vapor stream from a lower location on the tower (and perhaps combine it with a portion of the tower overhead vapor). This vapor (or combined vapor) stream is compressed to higher pressure, then cooled to substantial condensation, expanded to the tower operating pressure, and supplied as top feed to the tower. Typical process schemes of this type are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,476,639 and co-pending application Ser. Nos. 11/839,693; 12/869,139; and Ser. No. 15/259,891. These also require an additional rectification section in the demethanizer, plus a compressor to provide motive force for recycling the reflux stream to the demethanizer, again adding to both the capital cost and the operating cost of facilities using these processes.


However, there are many gas processing plants that have been built in the U.S. and other countries according to U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,157,904 and 4,278,457 (as well as other processes) that have no upper absorber section to provide additional rectification of the rising vapors and cannot be easily modified to add this feature. Also, these plants do not usually have surplus compression capacity to allow recycling a reflux stream. As a result, these plants are not as efficient when operated to recover C2 components and heavier components from the gas (commonly referred to as “ethane recovery”), and are particularly inefficient when operated to recover only the C3 components and heavier components from the gas (commonly referred to as “ethane rejection”).


The present invention is a novel means of providing additional rectification that can be easily added to existing gas processing plants to increase the recovery of the desired C2 components and/or C3 components without requiring additional residue gas compression or a separate recycle compressor. The incremental value of this increased recovery is often substantial. For the Examples given later, the incremental income from the additional recovery capability over that of the prior art is in the range of US$690,000 to US$4,720,000 [€ 580,000 to € 3,930,000] per year using an average incremental value US$0.10-0.58 per gallon [€ 22-129 per m3] for hydrocarbon liquids compared to the corresponding hydrocarbon gases.


The present invention also combines what heretofore have been individual equipment items into a common housing, thereby reducing both the plot space requirements and the capital cost of the addition. Surprisingly, applicants have found that the more compact arrangement also significantly increases the product recovery at a given power consumption, thereby increasing the process efficiency and reducing the operating cost of the facility. In addition, the more compact arrangement also eliminates much of the piping used to interconnect the individual equipment items in traditional plant designs, further reducing capital cost and also eliminating the associated flanged piping connections. Since piping flanges are a potential leak source for hydrocarbons (which are volatile organic compounds, VOCs, that contribute to greenhouse gases and may also be precursors to atmospheric ozone formation), eliminating these flanges reduces the potential for atmospheric emissions that may damage the environment.


In accordance with the present invention, it has been found that C2 recoveries in excess of 99% can be obtained. Similarly, in those instances where recovery of C2 components is not desired, C3 recoveries in excess of 96% can be maintained. The present invention, although applicable at lower pressures and warmer temperatures, is particularly advantageous when processing feed gases in the range of 400 to 1500 psia [2,758 to 10,342 kPa(a)] or higher under conditions requiring NGL recovery column overhead temperatures of −50° F. [−46° C.] or colder.





For a better understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following examples and drawings. Referring to the drawings:



FIGS. 1 and 2 are flow diagrams of prior art natural gas processing plants in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 4,157,904 or 4,278,457;



FIGS. 3 and 4 are flow diagrams of natural gas processing plants adapted to use the process of co-pending application Ser. No. 15/332,723;



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a natural gas processing plant adapted to use the present invention; and



FIGS. 6 through 11 are flow diagrams illustrating alternative means of application of the present invention to a natural gas processing plant.





In the following explanation of the above figures, tables are provided summarizing flow rates calculated for representative process conditions. In the tables appearing herein, the values for flow rates (in moles per hour) have been rounded to the nearest whole number for convenience. The total stream rates shown in the tables include all non-hydrocarbon components and hence are generally larger than the sum of the stream flow rates for the hydrocarbon components. Temperatures indicated are approximate values rounded to the nearest degree. It should also be noted that the process design calculations performed for the purpose of comparing the processes depicted in the figures are based on the assumption of no heat leak from (or to) the surroundings to (or from) the process. The quality of commercially available insulating materials makes this a very reasonable assumption and one that is typically made by those skilled in the art.


For convenience, process parameters are reported in both the traditional British units and in the units of the Système International d'Unités (SI). The molar flow rates given in the tables may be interpreted as either pound moles per hour or kilogram moles per hour. The energy consumptions reported as horsepower (HP) and/or thousand British Thermal Units per hour (MBTU/Hr) correspond to the stated molar flow rates in pound moles per hour. The energy consumptions reported as kilowatts (kW) correspond to the stated molar flow rates in kilogram moles per hour.


DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART


FIG. 1 is a process flow diagram showing the design of a processing plant to recover C2+ components from natural gas using prior art according to U.S. Pat. No. 4,157,904 or U.S. Pat. No. 4,278,457. In this simulation of the process, inlet gas enters the plant at 120° F. [49° C.] and 815 psia [5,617 kPa(a)] as stream 31. If the inlet gas contains a concentration of sulfur compounds which would prevent the product streams from meeting specifications, the sulfur compounds are removed by appropriate pretreatment of the feed gas (not illustrated). In addition, the feed stream is usually dehydrated to prevent hydrate (ice) formation under cryogenic conditions. Solid desiccant has typically been used for this purpose.


The feed stream 31 is cooled in heat exchanger 10 by heat exchange with cool residue gas (stream 39a), pumped liquid product at 20° F. [−7° C.] (stream 42a), demethanizer reboiler liquids at 0° F. [−18° C.] (stream 41), demethanizer side reboiler liquids at −45° F. [−43° C.] (stream 40), and propane refrigerant. Stream 31a then enters separator 11 at −29° F. [−34° C.] and 795 psia [5,479 kPa(a)] where the vapor (stream 32) is separated from the condensed liquid (stream 33).


The vapor (stream 32) from separator 11 is divided into two streams, 34 and 37. The liquid (stream 33) from separator 11 is optionally divided into two streams, 35 and 38. (Stream 35 may contain from 0% to 100% of the separator liquid in stream 33. If stream 35 contains any portion of the separator liquid, then the process of FIG. 1 is according to U.S. Pat. No. 4,157,904. Otherwise, the process of FIG. 1 is according to U.S. Pat. No. 4,278,457.) For the process illustrated in FIG. 1, stream 35 contains about 15% of the total separator liquid. Stream 34, containing about 30% of the total separator vapor, is combined with stream 35 and the combined stream 36 passes through heat exchanger 12 in heat exchange relation with the cold residue gas (stream 39) where it is cooled to substantial condensation. (In this context, “combining” is simply mixing together two or more streams by joining the piping or conduits containing the separate streams into a single pipe or conduit, most commonly with a piping toe, as shown in FIG. 3) The resulting substantially condensed stream 36a at −158° F. [−106° C.] is then flash expanded through expansion valve 13 to the operating pressure (approximately 168 psia) of fractionation tower 17. During expansion a portion of the stream is vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream. In the process illustrated in FIG. 1, the expanded stream 36b leaving expansion valve 13 reaches a temperature of −176° F. [−115° C.] and is supplied to separator section 17a in the upper region of fractionation tower 17. The liquids separated therein become the top feed to demethanizing section 17b.


The remaining 70% of the vapor from separator 11 (stream 37) enters a work expansion machine 14 in which mechanical energy is extracted from this portion of the high pressure feed. The machine 14 expands the vapor substantially isentropically to the tower operating pressure, with the work expansion cooling the expanded stream 37a to a temperature of approximately −126° F. [−88° C.]. The typical commercially available expanders are capable of recovering on the order of 80-85% of the work theoretically available in an ideal isentropic expansion. The work recovered is often used to drive a centrifugal compressor (such as item 15) that can be used to re-compress the residue gas (stream 39b), for example. The partially condensed expanded stream 37a is thereafter supplied as feed to fractionation tower 17 at an upper mid-column feed point. The remaining separator liquid in stream 38 (if any) is expanded to the operating pressure of fractionation tower 17 by expansion valve 16, cooling stream 38a to −85° F. [−65° C.] before it is supplied to fractionation tower 17 at a lower mid-column feed point.


The demethanizer in tower 17 is a conventional distillation column containing a plurality of vertically spaced trays, one or more packed beds, or some combination of trays and packing. As is often the case in natural gas processing plants, the fractionation tower may consist of two sections. The upper section 17a is a separator wherein the partially vaporized top feed is divided into its respective vapor and liquid portions, and wherein the vapor rising from the lower distillation or demethanizing section 17b is combined with the vapor portion of the top feed to form the cold demethanizer overhead vapor (stream 39) which exits the top of the tower. The lower, demethanizing section 17b contains the trays and/or packing and provides the necessary contact between the liquids falling downward and the vapors rising upward. The demethanizing section 17b also includes reboilers (such as the reboiler and the side reboiler described previously and supplemental reboiler 18) which heat and vaporize a portion of the liquids flowing down the column to provide the stripping vapors which flow up the column to strip the liquid product, stream 42, of methane and lighter components.


The liquid product stream 42 exits the bottom of the tower at 7° F. [−14° C.], based on a typical specification of a methane concentration of 0.5% on a volume basis in the bottom product. It is pumped to higher pressure by pump 21 (stream 42a) and then heated to 95° F. [35° C.] (stream 42b) as it provides cooling of the feed gas in heat exchanger 10 as described earlier. The residue gas (demethanizer overhead vapor stream 39) passes countercurrently to the incoming feed gas in heat exchanger 12 where it is heated from −176° F. [−115° C.] to −47° F. [−44° C.] (stream 39a) and in heat exchanger 10 where it is heated to 113° F. [45° C.] (stream 39b). The residue gas is then re-compressed in two stages. The first stage is compressor 15 driven by expansion machine 14. The second stage is compressor 19 driven by a supplemental power source which compresses the residue gas (stream 39d) to sales line pressure. After cooling to 120° F. [49° C.] in discharge cooler 20, the residue gas product (stream 39e) flows to the sales gas pipeline at 765 psia [5,272 kPa(a)], sufficient to meet line requirements (usually on the order of the inlet pressure).


A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in FIG. 1 is set forth in the following table:









TABLE I





(FIG. 1)


Stream Flow Summary - Lb. Moles/Hr [kg moles/Hr]




















Stream
Methane
Ethane
Propane
Butanes+
Total





31
17,272
2,734
1,070
657
21,961


32
15,282
1,678
360
76
17,613


33
1,990
1,056
710
581
4,348


34
4,541
499
107
23
5,233


35
298
158
107
87
652


36
4,839
657
214
110
5,885


37
10,741
1,179
253
53
12,380


38
1,692
898
603
494
3,696


39
17,236
90
2
0
17,556


42
36
2,644
1,068
657
4,405










Recoveries*













Ethane
96.69%



Propane
99.84%



Butanes+
99.99%










Power














Residue Gas Compression
15,204 HP
[24,995 kW]



Refrigerant Compression
 3,548 HP
 [5,833 kW]



Total Compression
18,752 HP
[30,828 kW]





*(Based on un-rounded flow rates)







FIG. 2 is a process flow diagram showing one manner in which the design of the processing plant in FIG. 1 can be adjusted to operate at a lower C2 component recovery level. This is a common requirement when the relative values of natural gas and liquid hydrocarbons are variable, causing recovery of the C2 components to be unprofitable at times. The process of FIG. 2 has been applied to the same feed gas composition and conditions as described previously for FIG. 1. However, in the simulation of the process of FIG. 2, the process operating conditions have been adjusted to reject nearly all of C2 components to the residue gas rather than recovering them in the bottom liquid product from the fractionation tower.


In this simulation of the process, inlet gas enters the plant at 120° F. [49° C.] and 815 psia [5,617 kPa(a)] as stream 31 and is cooled in heat exchanger 10 by heat exchange with cool residue gas stream 39a and flashed separator liquids (stream 38a). (One consequence of operating the FIG. 2 process to reject nearly all of the C2 components to the residue gas is that the temperatures of the liquids flowing down fractionation tower 17 are much warmer, to the point that side reboiler stream 40 and reboiler stream 41 are too warm to be used to cool the inlet gas, so that all of the column reboil heat must be supplied by supplemental reboiler 18. The pumped bottom product (stream 42a) is also too warm to be used to cool the inlet gas. In the FIG. 2 process, the flashed separator liquids are used in heat exchanger 10 in lieu of the side reboiler liquids in order to provide some cooling of the inlet gas while simultaneously reducing the duty required from supplemental reboiler 18.) Cooled stream 31a enters separator 11 at −14° F. [−26° C.] and 795 psia [5,479 kPa(a)] where the vapor (stream 32) is separated from the condensed liquid (stream 33).


The vapor (stream 32) from separator 11 is divided into two streams, 34 and 37, and the liquid (stream 33) is optionally divided into two streams, 35 and 38. For the process illustrated in FIG. 2, stream 35 contains about 36% of the total separator liquid. Stream 34, containing about 33% of the total separator vapor, is combined with stream 35 and the combined stream 36 passes through heat exchanger 12 in heat exchange relation with the cold residue gas (stream 39) where it is cooled to partial condensation. The resulting partially condensed stream 36a at −72° F. [−58° C.] is then flash expanded through expansion valve 13 to the operating pressure (approximately 200 psia [1,380 kPa(a)]) of fractionation tower 17. During expansion some of the liquid in the stream is vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream. In the process illustrated in FIG. 2, the expanded stream 36b leaving expansion valve 13 reaches a temperature of −138° F. [−94° C.] and is supplied to fractionation tower 17 at the top feed point.


The remaining 67% of the vapor from separator 11 (stream 37) enters a work expansion machine 14 in which mechanical energy is extracted from this portion of the high pressure feed. The machine 14 expands the vapor substantially isentropically to the tower operating pressure, with the work expansion cooling the expanded stream 37a to a temperature of approximately −103° F. [−75° C.] before it is supplied as feed to fractionation tower 17 at an upper mid-column feed point. The remaining separator liquid in stream 38 (if any) is expanded to slightly above the operating pressure of fractionation tower 17 by expansion valve 16, cooling stream 38a to −61° F. [−51° C.] before it is heated to 103° F. [39° C.] in heat exchanger 10 as described previously, with heated stream 40a then supplied to fractionation tower 17 at a lower mid-column feed point.


Note that when fractionation tower 17 is operated to reject the C2 components to the residue gas product as shown in FIG. 2, the column is typically referred to as a deethanizer and its lower section 17b is called a deethanizing section. The liquid product stream 42 exits the bottom of deethanizer 17 at 137° F. [58° C.], based on a typical specification of an ethane to propane ratio of 0.020:1 on a volume basis in the bottom product. The residue gas (deethanizer overhead vapor stream 39) passes countercurrently to the incoming feed gas in heat exchanger 12 where it is heated from −91° F. [−68° C.] to −29° F. [−34° C.] (stream 39a) and in heat exchanger 10 where it is heated to 103° F. [39° C.] (stream 39b) as it provides cooling as described previously. The residue gas is then re-compressed in two stages, compressor 15 driven by expansion machine 14 and compressor 19 driven by a supplemental power source. After stream 39d is cooled to 120° F. [49° C.] in discharge cooler 20, the residue gas product (stream 39e) flows to the sales gas pipeline at 765 psia [5,272 kPa(a)].


A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in FIG. 2 is set forth in the following table:









TABLE II





(FIG. 2)


Stream Flow Summary - Lb. Moles/Hr [kg moles/Hr]




















Stream
Methane
Ethane
Propane
Butanes+
Total





31
17,272
2,734
1,070
657
21,961


32
16,003
1,991
498
120
18,835


33
1,269
743
572
537
3,126


34
5,225
650
163
39
6,149


35
457
268
206
193
1,125


36
5,682
918
369
232
7,274


37
10,778
1,341
335
81
12,686


38/40
812
475
366
344
2,001


39
17,272
2,715
116
8
20,338


42
0
19
954
649
1,623










Recoveries*













Propane
89.20%



Butanes+
98.81%










Power














Residue Gas Compression
15,115 HP
[24,849 kW]



Refrigerant Compression
 3,625 HP
 [5,959 kW]



Total Compression
18,740 HP
[30,808 kW]





*(Based on un-rounded flow rates)






DESCRIPTION OF CO-PENDING APPLICATION

Co-pending application Ser. No. 15/332,723 describes one means of improving the performance of the FIG. 1 process to recover more of the C2 components in the bottom liquid product. FIG. 1 can be adapted to use this process as shown in FIG. 3. The operating conditions of the FIG. 3 process have been adjusted as shown to reduce the methane content of the liquid product to the same level as that of the FIG. 1 process. The feed gas composition and conditions considered in the process presented in FIG. 3 are the same as those in FIG. 1. Accordingly, the FIG. 3 process can be compared with that of the FIG. 1 process.


Most of the process conditions shown for the FIG. 3 process are much the same as the corresponding process conditions for the FIG. 1 process. The main difference is the disposition of substantially condensed stream 36a and column overhead vapor stream 39. In the FIG. 3 process, column overhead vapor stream 39 is divided into two streams, stream 151 and stream 152, whereupon stream 151 is compressed from the operating pressure (approximately 174 psia [1,202 kPa(a)]) of fractionation tower 17 to approximately 379 psia [2,616 kPa(a)] by reflux compressor 22. Compressed stream 151a at −81° F. [−63° C.] and substantially condensed stream 36a at −81° F. [−63° C.] are then directed into a heat exchange means in cooling section 117a of processing assembly 117. This heat exchange means may be comprised of a fin and tube type heat exchanger, a plate type heat exchanger, a brazed aluminum type heat exchanger, or other type of heat transfer device, including multi-pass and/or multi-service heat exchangers. The heat exchange means is configured to provide heat exchange between stream 151a flowing through one pass of the heat exchange means, substantially condensed stream 36a flowing through another pass of the heat exchange means, and a further rectified vapor stream arising from rectifying section 117b of processing assembly 117, so that stream 151a is cooled to substantial condensation (stream 151b) and stream 36a is further cooled (stream 36b) while heating the further rectified vapor stream.


Substantially condensed stream 151b at −171° F. [−113° C.] is then flash expanded through expansion valve 23 to slightly above the operating pressure of fractionation tower 17. During expansion a portion of the stream may be vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream. In the process illustrated in FIG. 3, the expanded stream 151c leaving expansion valve 23 reaches a temperature of −185° F. [−121° C.] before it is directed into a heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b of processing assembly 117. This heat and mass transfer means may also be comprised of a fin and tube type heat exchanger, a plate type heat exchanger, a brazed aluminum type heat exchanger, or other type of heat transfer device, including multi-pass and/or multi-service heat exchangers. The heat and mass transfer means is configured to provide heat exchange between a partially rectified vapor stream arising from absorbing section 117c of processing assembly 117 that is flowing upward through one pass of the heat and mass transfer means, and the flash expanded substantially condensed stream 151c flowing downward, so that the partially rectified vapor stream is cooled while heating the expanded stream. As the partially rectified vapor stream is cooled, a portion of it is condensed and falls downward while the remaining vapor continues flowing upward through the heat and mass transfer means. The heat and mass transfer means provides continuous contact between the condensed liquid and the partially rectified vapor stream so that it also functions to provide mass transfer between the vapor and liquid phases, thereby providing further rectification of the partially rectified vapor stream to form the further rectified vapor stream. This further rectified vapor stream arising from the heat and mass transfer means is then directed to the heat exchange means in cooling section 117a of processing assembly 117 to be heated as described previously. The condensed liquid from the bottom of the heat and mass transfer means is directed to absorbing section 117c of processing assembly 117.


The flash expanded stream 151c is further vaporized as it provides cooling and partial condensation of the partially rectified vapor stream, and exits the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b at −178° F. [−117° C.]. The heated flash expanded stream discharges into separator section 117d of processing assembly 117 and is separated into its respective vapor and liquid phases. The vapor phase combines with the remaining portion (stream 152) of overhead vapor stream 39 to form a combined vapor stream that enters a mass transfer means in absorbing section 117c of processing assembly 117. The mass transfer means may consist of a plurality of vertically spaced trays, one or more packed beds, or some combination of trays and packing, but could also be comprised of a non-heat transfer zone in a fin and tube type heat exchanger, a plate type heat exchanger, a brazed aluminum type heat exchanger, or other type of heat transfer device, including multi-pass and/or multi-service heat exchangers. The mass transfer means is configured to provide contact between the cold condensed liquid leaving the bottom of the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b and the combined vapor stream arising from separator section 117d. As the combined vapor stream rises upward through absorbing section 117c, it is contacted with the cold liquid falling downward to condense and absorb C2 components, C3 components, and heavier components from the combined vapor stream. The resulting partially rectified vapor stream is then directed to the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b of processing assembly 117 for further rectification as described previously.


The liquid phase (if any) from the heated flash expanded stream leaving rectifying section 117b of processing assembly 117 that is separated in separator section 117d combines with the distillation liquid leaving the bottom of the mass transfer means in absorbing section 117c of processing assembly 117 to form combined liquid stream 154. Combined liquid stream 154 leaves the bottom of processing assembly 117 and is pumped to higher pressure by pump 24 (stream 154a at −170° F. [−112° C.]). Further cooled stream 36b at −169° F. [−112° C.] is flash expanded through expansion valve 13 to the operating pressure of fractionation tower 17. During expansion a portion of the stream may be vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream to −177° F. [−116° C.]. Flash expanded stream 36c then joins with pumped stream 154a to form combined feed stream 155, which then enters fractionation column 17 at the top feed point at −176° F. [−116° C.].


The further rectified vapor stream leaves the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b of processing assembly 117 at −182° F. [−119° C.] and enters the heat exchange means in cooling section 117a of processing assembly 117. The vapor is heated to −96° F. [−71° C.] as it provides cooling to streams 36a and 151a as described previously. The heated vapor is then discharged from processing assembly 117 as cool residue gas stream 153, which is heated and compressed as described previously for stream 39 in the FIG. 1 process.


A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in FIG. 3 is set forth in the following table:









TABLE III





(FIG. 3)


Stream Flow Summary - Lb. Moles/Hr [kg moles/Hr]




















Stream
Methane
Ethane
Propane
Butanes+
Total





31
17,272
2,734
1,070
657
21,961


32
15,276
1,676
359
76
17,604


33
1,996
1,058
711
581
4,357


34
3,247
356
76
16
3,742


35
499
264
178
145
1,089


36
3,746
620
254
161
4,831


37
12,029
1,320
283
60
13,862


38
1,497
794
533
436
3,268


39
17,608
179
3
0
18,020


151
1,610
16
0
0
1,647


152
15,998
163
3
0
16,373


154
373
144
3
0
521


155
4,119
764
254
161
5,352


153
17,235
35
0
0
17,499


42
37
2,699
1,070
657
4,462










Recoveries*













Ethane
98.70%



Propane
100.00%



Butanes+
100.00%










Power














Residue Gas Compression
14,660 HP
[24,101 kW]



Refrigerant Compression
 3,733 HP
 [6,137 kW]



Reflux Compression
  354 HP
  [582 kW]



Total Compression
18,747 HP
[30,820 kW]





*(Based on un-rounded flow rates)






A comparison of Tables I and III shows that, compared to the FIG. 1 process, the FIG. 3 process improves ethane recovery from 96.69% to 98.70%, propane recovery from 99.84% to 100.00%, and butane+ recovery from 99.99% to 100.00%. Comparison of Tables I and III further shows that these increased product yields were achieved without using additional power.


The process of co-pending application Ser. No. 15/332,723 can also be operated to reject nearly all of the C2 components to the residue gas rather than recovering them in the liquid product. The operating conditions of the FIG. 3 process can be altered as illustrated in FIG. 4 (including the idling of the heat exchange means in cooling section 117a of processing assembly 117) to reduce the ethane content of the liquid product to the essentially the same level as that of the FIG. 2 process. The feed gas composition and conditions considered in the process presented in FIG. 4 are the same as those in FIG. 2. Accordingly, the FIG. 4 process can be compared with that of the FIG. 2 process.


Most of the process conditions shown for the FIG. 4 process are much the same as the corresponding process conditions for the FIG. 2 process. The main differences are again the disposition of substantially condensed stream 36a and column overhead vapor stream 39. In the FIG. 4 process, substantially condensed stream 36a is flash expanded through expansion valve 23 to slightly above the operating pressure (approximately 200 psia [1,381 kPa(a)]) of fractionation tower 17. During expansion a portion of the stream is vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream. In the process illustrated in FIG. 4, the expanded stream 36b leaving expansion valve 23 reaches a temperature of −156° F. [−104° C.] before it is directed into the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b of processing assembly 117.


The flash expanded stream 36b is further vaporized as it provides cooling and partial condensation of the combined vapor stream, and exits the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b at −83° F. [−64° C.]. The heated flash expanded stream discharges into separator section 117d of processing assembly 117 and is separated into its respective vapor and liquid phases. The vapor phase combines with overhead vapor stream 39 to form the combined vapor stream that enters the mass transfer means in absorbing section 117c as described previously, and the liquid phase combines with the condensed liquid from the bottom of the mass transfer means in absorbing section 117c to form combined liquid stream 154. Combined liquid stream 154 leaves the bottom of processing assembly 117 and is pumped to higher pressure by pump 24 so that stream 154a at −73° F. [−58° C.] can enter fractionation column 17 at the top feed point. The further rectified vapor stream leaves the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b and discharges from processing assembly 117 at −104° F. [−76° C.] as cold residue gas stream 153, which is then heated and compressed as described previously for stream 39 in the FIG. 2 process.


A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in FIG. 4 is set forth in the following table:









TABLE IV





(FIG. 4)


Stream Flow Summary - Lb. Moles/Hr [kg moles/Hr]




















Stream
Methane
Ethane
Propane
Butanes+
Total





31
17,272
2,734
1,070
657
21,961


32
15,902
1,943
474
112
18,652


33
1,370
791
596
545
3,309


34
3,263
399
97
23
3,827


35
507
293
221
202
1,224


36
3,770
692
318
225
5,051


37
12,639
1,544
377
89
14,825


38/40
863
498
375
343
2,085


39
13,802
2,765
294
16
17,061


154 
300
744
575
241
1,861


153 
17,272
2,713
37
0
20,251


42
0
21
1,033
657
1,710










Recoveries*













Propane
96.50%



Butanes+
100.00%










Power














Residue Gas Compression
15,114 HP
[24,847 kW]



Refrigerant Compression
 3,621 HP
 [5,953 kW]



Reflux Compression
   0 HP
   [0 kW]



Total Compression
18,735 HP
[30,800 kW]





*(Based on un-rounded flow rates)






A comparison of Tables II and IV shows that, compared to the FIG. 2 process, the FIG. 4 process improves propane recovery from 89.20% to 96.50% and butane+ recovery from 98.81% to 100.00%. Comparison of Tables II and IV further shows that these increased product yields were achieved without using additional power.


DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Example 1

In those cases where it is desirable to maximize the recovery of C2 components in the liquid product (as in the FIG. 1 prior art process described previously, for instance), the present invention offers significant efficiency advantages over the prior art process depicted in FIG. 1 and the process of co-pending application Ser. No. 15/332,723 depicted in FIG. 3. FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of the FIG. 1 prior art process that has been adapted to use the present invention. The operating conditions of the FIG. 5 process have been adjusted as shown to increase the ethane content of the liquid product above the level that is possible with the FIGS. 1 and 3 processes. The feed gas composition and conditions considered in the process presented in FIG. 5 are the same as those in FIGS. 1 and 3. Accordingly, the FIG. 5 process can be compared with that of the FIGS. 1 and 3 processes to illustrate the advantages of the present invention.


Most of the process conditions shown for the FIG. 5 process are much the same as the corresponding process conditions for the FIG. 1 process. The main difference is the disposition of substantially condensed stream 36a and column overhead vapor stream 39. In the FIG. 5 process, column overhead vapor stream 39 at −141° F. [−96° C.] and 236 psia [1,625 kPa(a)] (the operating pressure of fractionation tower 17) is directed to separator section 117d inside single equipment item processing assembly 117. Substantially condensed stream 36a at −105° F. [−76° C.] and partially cooled recycle stream 151a at −95° F. [−71° C.] are directed into a heat exchange means in cooling section 117a inside processing assembly 117. This heat exchange means may be comprised of a fin and tube type heat exchanger, a plate type heat exchanger, a brazed aluminum type heat exchanger, or other type of heat transfer device, including multi-pass and/or multi-service heat exchangers. The heat exchange means is configured to provide heat exchange between substantially condensed stream 36a flowing through one pass of the heat exchange means, partially cooled recycle stream 151a flowing through another pass of the heat exchange means, and a combined stream arising from rectifying section 117b inside processing assembly 117, so that stream 36a is further cooled (stream 36b) and stream 151a is cooled to substantial condensation (stream 151b) while heating the combined stream.


Absorbing section 117c inside processing assembly 117 contains a mass transfer means. This mass transfer means may consist of a plurality of vertically spaced trays, one or more packed beds, or some combination of trays and packing, but could also be comprised of a non-heat transfer zone in a fin and tube type heat exchanger, a plate type heat exchanger, a brazed aluminum type heat exchanger, or other type of heat transfer device, including multi-pass and/or multi-service heat exchangers. The mass transfer means is configured to provide contact between cold condensed liquid leaving the bottom of a heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b inside processing assembly 117 and column overhead vapor stream 39 arising from separator section 117d inside processing assembly 117. As the column overhead vapor stream rises upward through absorbing section 117c, it is contacted with the cold liquid falling downward to condense and absorb C2 components, C3 components, and heavier components from the vapor stream. The resulting partially rectified vapor stream is then directed to the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b inside processing assembly 117 for further rectification.


Substantially condensed stream 151b at −168° F. [−111° C.] is flash expanded through expansion valve 23 to slightly above the operating pressure of fractionation tower 17. During expansion a portion of the stream may be vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream. In the process illustrated in FIG. 5, the expanded stream 151c leaving expansion valve 23 reaches a temperature of −174° F. [−114° C.] before it is directed into the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b inside processing assembly 117. This heat and mass transfer means may also be comprised of a fin and tube type heat exchanger, a plate type heat exchanger, a brazed aluminum type heat exchanger, or other type of heat transfer device, including multi-pass and/or multi-service heat exchangers. The heat and mass transfer means is configured to provide heat exchange between the partially rectified vapor stream arising from absorbing section 117c inside processing assembly 117 that is flowing upward through one pass of the heat and mass transfer means, and the flash expanded substantially condensed stream 151c flowing downward, so that the partially rectified vapor stream is cooled while heating the expanded stream. As the partially rectified vapor stream is cooled, a portion of it is condensed and falls downward while the remaining vapor continues flowing upward through the heat and mass transfer means. The heat and mass transfer means provides continuous contact between the condensed liquid and the partially rectified vapor stream so that it also functions to provide mass transfer between the vapor and liquid phases, thereby providing further rectification of the partially rectified vapor stream to form a further rectified vapor stream. The condensed liquid from the bottom of the heat and mass transfer means is directed to absorbing section 117c inside processing assembly 117.


The flash expanded stream 151c is further vaporized as it provides cooling and partial condensation of the partially rectified vapor stream, and exits the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b inside processing assembly 117 at −172° F. [−113° C.]. The heated flash expanded stream then mixes with the further rectified vapor stream to form a combined stream at −172° F. [−113° C.] that is directed to the heat exchange means in cooling section 117a inside processing assembly 117. The combined stream is heated as it provides cooling to streams 36a and 151a as described previously.


The distillation liquid leaving the bottom of the mass transfer means in absorbing section 117c discharges from the bottom of processing assembly 117 (stream 154) and is pumped to higher pressure by pump 24 (stream 154a at −146° F. [−99° C.]). Further cooled substantially condensed stream 36b at −157° F. [−105° C.] is flash expanded through expansion valve 13 to the operating pressure of fractionation tower 17. During expansion a portion of the stream may be vaporized and thereby cool the total stream, but in this instance there is no significant vaporization and the stream instead warms slightly to −156° F. [−104° C.]. Flash expanded stream 36c then joins with pumped stream 154a to form combined feed stream 155, which enters fractionation column 17 at the top feed point at −154° F. [−103° C.].


The heated combined stream 152 is discharged from the heat exchange means in cooling section 117a inside processing assembly 117 at −109° F. [−79° C.] and is divided into two portions, stream 156 and stream 157. Stream 157 is heated in heat exchangers 12 and 10 as described previously for stream 39 in the FIG. 1 process. Stream 156 is directed to heat exchanger 22 where it is heated to 91° F. [33° C.] (stream 156a) as it provides cooling to recycle stream 151. Heated stream 156a rejoins heated stream 157b to form stream 152a at 102° F. [39° C.], which is then compressed as described previously for stream 39 in the FIG. 1 process. After cooling to 120° F. [49° C.] in discharge cooler 20, stream 152d is divided into the residue gas product (stream 153) and the recycle stream (stream 151). Stream 153 flows to the sales gas pipeline at 765 psia [5,272 kPa(a)], while recycle stream 151 is directed to heat exchanger 22 to be cooled as described previously.


A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in FIG. 5 is set forth in the following table:









TABLE V





(FIG. 5)


Stream Flow Summary - Lb. Moles/Hr [kg moles/Hr]




















Stream
Methane
Ethane
Propane
Butanes+
Total





31
17,272
2,734
1,070
657
21,961


32
15,258
1,669
356
75
17,576


33
2,014
1,065
714
582
4,385


34
1,910
209
45
9
2,200


35
1,208
639
428
349
2,631


36
3,118
848
473
358
4,831


37
13,348
1,460
311
66
15,376


38
806
426
286
233
1,754


39
17,964
407
12
1
18,515


151
3,790
3
0
0
3,843


152
21,025
16
0
0
21,320


156
5,306
4
0
0
5,380


157
15,719
12
0
0
15,940


154
629
394
12
1
1,038


155
3,747
1,242
485
359
5,869


153
17,235
13
0
0
17,477


42
37
2,721
1,070
657
4,484










Recoveries*













Ethane
99.51%



Propane
100.00%



Butanes+
100.00%










Power














Residue Gas Compression
14,118 HP
[23,210 kW]



Refrigerant Compression
 3,988 HP
 [6,556 kW]



Total Compression
18,106 HP
[29,766 kW]





*(Based on un-rounded flow rates)






A comparison of Tables I and V shows that, compared to the prior art of FIG. 1, the present invention improves ethane recovery from 96.69% to 99.51%, propane recovery from 99.84% to 100.00%, and butane+ recovery from 99.99% to 100.00%. The economic impact of these improved recoveries is significant. Using an average incremental value $0.10/gallon [€ 21.9/m3] for hydrocarbon liquids compared to the corresponding hydrocarbon gases, the improved recoveries represent more than US$690,000 [€ 580,000] of additional annual revenue for the plant operator. Comparison of Tables III and V shows that the present invention is also an improvement over co-pending application Ser. No. 15/332,723, increasing the ethane recovery from 98.70% to 99.51%. Comparison of Tables I, III, and V further shows that these increased product yields were achieved using less power than the FIGS. 1 and 3 processes. In terms of the recovery efficiency (defined by the quantity of C2 components and heavier components recovered per unit of power), the present invention represents more than a 5% improvement over the prior art of the FIG. 1.


The improvement in recovery efficiency provided by the present invention over that of the prior art of the FIG. 1 process is primarily due to the supplemental indirect cooling of the column overhead vapor provided by flash expanded stream 151c in rectifying section 117b inside processing assembly 117, in addition to the direct-contact cooling provided by stream 36b in the prior art process of FIG. 1. Although stream 36b is quite cold, it is not an ideal reflux stream because it contains significant concentrations of the C2 components, C3 components, and C4+ components that demethanizer 17 is supposed to capture, resulting in losses of these desirable components due to equilibrium effects at the top of column 17 for the prior art process of FIG. 1. For the present invention shown in FIG. 5, however, the supplemental cooling provided by flash expanded stream 151c has no equilibrium effects to overcome because there is no direct contact between flash expanded stream 151c and the column overhead vapor stream to be rectified.


The present invention has the further advantage of using the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b to simultaneously cool the column overhead vapor stream and condense the heavier hydrocarbon components from it, providing more efficient rectification than using reflux in a conventional distillation column. As a result, more of the C2 components, C3 components, and heavier hydrocarbon components can be removed from the column overhead vapor stream using the refrigeration available in flash expanded stream 151c than is possible using conventional mass transfer equipment and conventional heat transfer equipment.


The present invention offers two other advantages over the prior art in addition to the increase in processing efficiency. First, the compact arrangement of processing assembly 117 of the present invention incorporates what would normally be three separate equipment items (the heat exchange means in cooling section 117a, the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b, and the mass transfer means in absorbing section 117c) into a single equipment item (processing assembly 117 in FIG. 5 of the present invention). This reduces the plot space requirements and eliminates the interconnecting piping, reducing the capital cost of modifying a processing plant to use the present invention. Second, elimination of the interconnecting piping means that a processing plant modified to use the present invention has far fewer flanged connections, reducing the number of potential leak sources in the plant. Hydrocarbons are volatile organic compounds (VOCs), some of which are classified as greenhouse gases and some of which may be precursors to atmospheric ozone formation, which means the present invention reduces the potential for atmospheric releases that may damage the environment.


One additional advantage of the present invention is how easily it can be incorporated into an existing gas processing plant to effect the superior performance described above. As shown in FIG. 5, only six connections (commonly referred to as “tie-ins”) to the existing plant are needed: for substantially condensed stream 36a (represented by the dashed line between stream 36a and stream 36b that is removed from service), for column feed line 155 (represented by the connection with stream 154a), for column overhead vapor stream 39 (represented by the dashed line between stream 39 and stream 152 that is removed from service, the connection with stream 156, and the connection with stream 157b), and for residue gas line 153 (represented by the connection with stream 151). The existing plant can continue to operate while the new processing assembly 117 is installed near fractionation tower 17, with just a short plant shutdown when installation is complete to make the new tie-ins to these six existing lines. The plant can then be restarted, with all of the existing equipment remaining in service and operating exactly as before, except that the product recovery is now higher with no increase in compression power.


The main reason the present invention is more efficient than our co-pending application Ser. No. 15/332,723 depicted in FIG. 3 is that it removes nearly all of the heat of compression added by reflux compressor 22 in the FIG. 3 process by withdrawing recycle stream 151 in the FIG. 5 process downstream of discharge cooler 20 after the residue gas has been compressed. In the FIG. 3 process, compressor discharge stream 151a is much hotter than compressor suction stream 151 (−81° F. [−63° C.] for stream 151a versus −167° F. [−110° C.] for stream 151). This additional heat in the compressed stream must be removed in cooling section 117a inside processing assembly 117 in the FIG. 3 process, meaning less cooling is available for streams 36a and 151a. Contrast this with the FIG. 5 embodiment of the present invention, where the cooled compressed recycle stream 151 is nearly the same temperature as compressor suction stream 152a (120° F. [49° C.] for stream 151 versus 102° F. [39° C.] for stream 152a). This allows streams 151 and 36 to be cooled to significantly lower temperatures by cool residue gas stream 152 in heat exchangers 22 and 12 before entering processing assembly 117. This means more cooling is available in cooling section 117a inside processing assembly 117 of the present invention, allowing more flow for flash expanded stream 151c (more than twice the flow compared to stream 151c in FIG. 3), which in turn allows more reflux flow to the top of demethanizer 17 (10% higher flow for stream 155 in FIG. 5 compared to stream 155 in FIG. 3).


Example 2

The present invention also offers advantages when product economics favor rejecting the C2 components to the residue gas product. The present invention can be easily reconfigured to operate in a manner similar to that of our U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,637,428 and 9,927,171 as shown in FIG. 6. The operating conditions of the FIG. 5 embodiment of the present invention can be altered as illustrated in FIG. 6 to reduce the ethane content of the liquid product to the same level as that of the FIG. 2 prior art process and of co-pending application Ser. No. 15/332,723 depicted in FIG. 4. The feed gas composition and conditions considered in the process presented in FIG. 6 are the same as those in FIGS. 2 and 4. Accordingly, the FIG. 6 process can be compared with that of the FIGS. 2 and 4 processes to further illustrate the advantages of the present invention.


When operating the present invention in this manner, many of the process conditions shown for the FIG. 6 process are much the same as the corresponding process conditions for the FIG. 2 process, although most of the process configuration is like the FIG. 5 embodiment of the present invention. The main difference relative to the FIG. 5 embodiment is that the flash expanded stream 36b directed to the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b inside processing assembly 117 for FIG. 6 originates from substantially condensed stream 36a, rather than from the compressed residue gas stream 152d as in FIG. 5. As such, there is no recycle, and heat exchanger 22 can be taken out of service (as indicated by the dashed lines) when operating in this manner.


For the operating conditions shown in FIG. 6, combined stream 36 is cooled to −92° F. [−69° C.] in heat exchanger 12 by heat exchange with cool residue gas stream 152. The substantially condensed stream 36a is flash expanded through expansion valve 23 to slightly above the operating pressure (approximately 200 psia [1,381 kPa(a)]) of fractionation tower 17. During expansion a portion of the stream may be vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream. In the process illustrated in FIG. 6, the expanded stream 36b leaving expansion valve 23 reaches a temperature of −156° F. [−104° C.] before it is directed into the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b inside processing assembly 117.


The flash expanded stream 36b is further vaporized as it provides cooling and partial condensation of the partially rectified vapor stream, and exits the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b inside processing assembly 117 at −83° F. [−64° C.]. The heated flash expanded stream 36c is then mixed with pumped liquid stream 154a to form combined feed stream 155, which enters fractionation column 17 at the top feed point at −82° F. [−64° C.].


The further rectified vapor stream leaves the heat and mass transfer means in rectifying section 117b inside processing assembly 117 at −104° F. [−76° C.]. Since the heat exchange means in cooling section 117a inside processing assembly 117 has been idled, the vapor simply discharges from processing assembly 117 as cool residue gas stream 152, which is heated and compressed as described previously for stream 39 in the FIG. 2 process.


A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in FIG. 6 is set forth in the following table:









TABLE VI





(FIG. 6)


Stream Flow Summary - Lb. Moles/Hr [kg moles/Hr]




















Stream
Methane
Ethane
Propane
Butanes+
Total





31
17,272
2,734
1,070
657
21,961


32
15,902
1,943
474
112
18,652


33
1,370
791
596
545
3,309


34
3,263
399
97
23
3,827


35
507
293
221
202
1,224


36
3,770
692
318
225
5,051


37
12,639
1,544
377
89
14,825


38/40
863
498
375
343
2,085


39
13,802
2,765
294
16
17,061


154 
300
744
575
241
1,861


155 
4,070
1,436
893
466
6,912


153 
17,272
2,713
37
0
20,251


42
0
21
1,033
657
1,710










Recoveries*













Propane
96.50%



Butanes+
100.00%










Power














Residue Gas Compression
15,114 HP
[24,847 kW]



Refrigerant Compression
 3,621 HP
 [5,953 kW]



Reflux Compression
   0 HP
   [0 kW]



Total Compression
18,735 HP
[30,800 kW]





*(Based on un-rounded flow rates)






A comparison of Tables II and VI shows that, compared to the prior art, the FIG. 6 process improves propane recovery from 89.20% to 96.50% and butane+ recovery from 98.81% to 100.00%. Comparison of Tables II and VI further shows that these increased product yields were achieved without using additional power. The economic impact of these improved recoveries is substantial. Using an average incremental value $0.58/gallon [€ 129/m3] for hydrocarbon liquids compared to the corresponding hydrocarbon gases, the improved recoveries represent more than US$4,720,000 [€ 3,930,000] of additional annual revenue for the plant operator. A comparison of Tables IV and VI shows that the FIG. 6 process has essentially the same performance as co-pending application Ser. No. 15/332,723 when rejecting C2 components to the residue gas product.


OTHER EMBODIMENTS

Some circumstances may favor mounting the liquid pump inside the processing assembly to further reduce the number of equipment items and the plot space requirements. Such embodiments are shown in FIGS. 7 and 10, with pump 124 mounted inside processing assembly 117 as shown to send the distillation liquid stream from separator section 117d via conduit 154 to combine with stream 36c and form combined feed stream 155 that is supplied as the top feed to column 17. The pump and its driver may both be mounted inside the processing assembly if a submerged pump or canned motor pump is used, or just the pump itself may be mounted inside the processing assembly (using a magnetically-coupled drive for the pump, for instance). For either option, the potential for atmospheric releases of hydrocarbons that may damage the environment is reduced still further.


Some circumstances may favor locating the processing assembly at a higher elevation than the top feed point on fractionation column 17. In such cases, it may be possible for distillation liquid stream 154 to flow by gravity head and combine with stream 36c so that the resulting combined feed stream 155 then flows to the top feed point on fractionation column 17 as shown in FIGS. 8 and 11, eliminating the need for pump 24/124 shown in the FIGS. 5 through 7, 9, and 10 embodiments.


Some circumstances may favor eliminating cooling section 117a from processing assembly 117, and using a heat exchange means external to the processing assembly for feed cooling, such as heat exchanger 25 shown in FIGS. 9 through 11. Such an arrangement allows processing assembly 117 to be smaller, which may reduce the overall plant cost and/or shorten the fabrication schedule in some cases. Note that in all cases exchanger 25 is representative of either a multitude of individual heat exchangers or a single multi-pass heat exchanger, or any combination thereof. Each such heat exchanger may be comprised of a fin and tube type heat exchanger, a plate type heat exchanger, a brazed aluminum type heat exchanger, or other type of heat transfer device, including multi-pass and/or multi-service heat exchangers.


The present invention provides improved recovery of C2 components, C3 components, and heavier hydrocarbon components per amount of utility consumption required to operate the process. An improvement in utility consumption required for operating the process may appear in the form of reduced power requirements for compression or re-compression, reduced power requirements for external refrigeration, reduced energy requirements for supplemental heating, or a combination thereof.


While there have been described what are believed to be preferred embodiments of the invention, those skilled in the art will recognize that other and further modifications may be made thereto, e.g. to adapt the invention to various conditions, types of feed, or other requirements without departing from the spirit of the present invention as defined by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for the separation of a gas stream containing methane, C2 components, C3 components, and heavier hydrocarbon components into a volatile residue gas fraction and a relatively less volatile fraction containing a major portion of said C2 components, C3 components, and heavier hydrocarbon components or said C3 components and heavier hydrocarbon components, in said apparatus there being (a) one or more inlet gas heat exchangers and one or more inlet dividers to cool said gas stream under pressure, thereby producing a substantially condensed first stream, and a cooled second stream;(b) a first expansion device connected to receive said substantially cooled first stream under pressure and expand said substantially condensed first stream to a lower pressure, whereby said first stream is further cooled, thereby forming an expanded further cooled first stream;(c) a distillation column connected to said first expansion device to receive said expanded further cooled first stream at a top feed position, with said distillation column producing at least an overhead vapor stream and a bottom liquid stream;(d) a second expansion device connected to receive said cooled second stream under pressure and expand said cooled second stream to said lower pressure, thereby forming an expanded second stream;(e) said distillation column further connected to said second expansion device to receive said expanded second stream at a mid-column feed position;(f) a heater connected to said distillation column to receive and heat said overhead vapor stream, thereby forming a heated gas stream;(g) a compressor connected to said heater to receive and compress said heated gas stream to a higher pressure, thereby forming a compressed gas stream;(h) a cooler connected to said compressor to receive and cool said compressed gas stream, thereby forming a cooled compressed gas stream that is thereafter discharged as said volatile residue gas fraction; and(i) said distillation column adapted to fractionate at least said expanded further cooled first stream and said expanded second stream at said lower pressure whereby the components of said relatively less volatile fraction are recovered in said bottom liquid stream;wherein said apparatus further includes(1) an absorbing section comprising one or more packed beds and trays, wherein said absorbing section is housed in a single equipment item processing assembly and connected to said distillation column to receive and contact said overhead vapor stream with a condensed stream, thereby condensing less volatile components in said overhead vapor stream and forming a partially rectified vapor stream;a rectifying section providing simultaneous heat transfer selected from one or more of a fin and tube type exchanger, a plate type exchanger, a brazed aluminum type exchanger and other type of heat transfer device with said rectifying section housed in said single equipment item processing assembly and connected to said absorbing section to receive said partially rectified vapor stream from an upper region of said absorbing section, whereby said partially rectified vapor stream is cooled while simultaneously condensing the less volatile components in said partially rectified vapor stream, thereby forming a further rectified vapor stream and said condensed stream, said rectifying section being further connected to said absorbing section to direct said condensed stream to said absorbing section(3) a first combiner connected to said rectifying section to receive said further rectified vapor stream and a heated flash expanded stream and form a combined stream;(4) an additional heat exchanger selected from one or more of a fin and tube type exchanger, a plate type exchanger, a brazed aluminum type exchanger, and other type of heat transfer device connected to said first combiner to receive and heat said combined stream forming a heated combined stream;(5) said heater being adapted to be connected to said additional heater to receive and further heat said heated combined stream, thereby forming said heated gas stream;(6) an additional divider connected to said cooler to receive and divide said cooled compressed gas stream into a recycle stream and said volatile residue gas fraction;(7) said additional heat exchanger further connected to said additional divider means to receive and cool said recycle stream to substantial condensation, thereby to supply at least a portion of the heating of step (4) and forming a substantially condensed stream;(8) a third expansion device connected to said additional heat exchanger to receive and expand said substantially condensed stream to said lower pressure, thereby forming a flash expanded stream;(9) said rectifying section further connected to said third expansion device to receive and heat said flash expanded stream, thereby to supply the cooling of step (2) and forming said heated flash expanded stream;(10) said additional heat exchanger further connected to said one or more inlet gas heat exchangers and said at least one or more inlet dividers to receive and further cool under pressure said substantially condensed first stream, thereby to supply at least a portion of the heating of step (4) and forming a further cooled substantially condensed first stream;(11) said first expansion device being adapted to connect to said additional exchanger to receive and expand said further cooled substantially condensed first stream to said lower pressure, thereby forming said expanded further cooled first stream;(12) a second combiner connected to said absorbing section and to said first expansion device to receive a distillation liquid stream from a lower region of said absorbing means and said expanded further cooled first stream and form a combined feed stream, said second combiner being further connected to said distillation column to supply said combined feed stream at said top feed position of said distillation column; andsaid distillation column being adapted to fractionate at least said combined feed stream and said expanded second stream at said lower pressure whereby the components of said relatively less volatile fraction are recovered in said bottom liquid stream.
  • 2. The apparatus according to claim 1 wherein (1) said one or more inlet gas heat exchangers is adapted to cool said gas stream under pressure sufficiently to be partially condensed, thereby forming a partially condensed gas stream;(2) a separator is connected to said one or more inlet gas heat exchangers to receive and separate said partially condensed gas stream into a vapor stream and at least one liquid stream;(3) said at least one inlet dividers is connected to said feed separating means and adapted to receive and divide said vapor stream into at least said first stream and said cooled second stream;(4) said one or more inlet gas heat exchangers is connected to said at least one inlet dividers and adapted to receive and cool said first stream sufficiently to substantially condense said first stream, thereby forming said substantially condensed first stream;(5) said second expansion device is connected to said at least one inlet dividers and adapted to receive and expand said cooled second stream to said lower pressure, thereby forming said expanded second stream; and(6) said distillation column is adapted to fractionate at least said combined feed stream, said expanded second stream, and said expanded liquid stream at said lower pressure whereby the components of said relatively less volatile fraction are recovered in said bottom liquid stream.
  • 3. The apparatus according to claim 2 wherein (1) said at least one inlet dividers is adapted to divide said vapor stream into at least a further vapor stream and said second cooled stream;(2) a vapor-liquid combiner is connected to said at least one inlet dividers and to said separator to receive said further vapor stream and at least a portion of said at least one liquid stream and form said first stream;(3) said one or more inlet gas heat exchangers is connected to said vapor-liquid combiner and adapted to receive and cool said first stream sufficiently to be substantially condensed, thereby forming said substantially condensed first stream; and(4) said fourth expansion means is adapted to receive and expand any remaining portion of said at least one liquid stream to said lower pressure, whereupon said expanded liquid stream is supplied to said distillation column at said lower mid-column feed position.
  • 4. The apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said additional heat exchanger is housed in said processing assembly.
  • 5. The apparatus according to claim 2 wherein said additional heat exchanger is housed in said processing assembly.
  • 6. The apparatus according to claim 3 wherein said additional heat exchanger is housed in said processing assembly.
  • 7. The apparatus according to claim 1, 2, or 3 wherein (1) a pump is connected to said absorbing section to receive and pump said distillation liquid stream from said lower region of said absorbing section to an intermediate pressure, thereby forming a pumped distillation liquid stream; and(2) said second combiner is adapted to be connected to said pump and to said first expansion device to receive said pumped distillation liquid stream and said expanded further cooled first stream and form said combined feed stream.
  • 8. The apparatus according to claim 7 wherein said pump is housed in said processing assembly.
US Referenced Citations (262)
Number Name Date Kind
33408 Turner et al. Oct 1861 A
311402 Withington Jan 1885 A
2603310 Gilmore Jul 1952 A
2880592 Davison et al. Apr 1959 A
2952984 Marshall Sep 1960 A
2952985 Brandon Sep 1960 A
3292380 Bucklin Dec 1966 A
3292980 Gustafsson et al. Dec 1966 A
3477915 Gantt et al. Nov 1969 A
3507127 De Marco Apr 1970 A
3508412 Yearout Apr 1970 A
3516261 Hoffman Jun 1970 A
3524897 Kniel Aug 1970 A
3625017 Hoffman Dec 1971 A
3656311 Kaiser Apr 1972 A
3675435 Jackson et al. Jul 1972 A
3724226 Pachaly Apr 1973 A
3763658 Gaumer, Jr. et al. Oct 1973 A
3797261 Juncker et al. Mar 1974 A
3837172 Markbreiter et al. Sep 1974 A
3902329 King, III et al. Sep 1975 A
3920767 Carter Nov 1975 A
3969450 Hengstebeck Jul 1976 A
3983711 Solomon Oct 1976 A
4002042 Pryor et al. Jan 1977 A
4004430 Solomon et al. Jan 1977 A
4033735 Swenson Jul 1977 A
4061481 Campbell et al. Dec 1977 A
4065278 Newton et al. Dec 1977 A
4115086 Jordan et al. Sep 1978 A
4127009 Phillips Nov 1978 A
4132604 Alexion et al. Jan 1979 A
4140504 Campbell et al. Feb 1979 A
4157904 Campbell et al. Jun 1979 A
4171964 Campbell et al. Oct 1979 A
4185978 McGalliard et al. Jan 1980 A
4203741 Bellinger et al. May 1980 A
4251249 Gulsby Feb 1981 A
4278457 Campbell et al. Jul 1981 A
4284423 Eakman et al. Aug 1981 A
4318723 Holmes et al. Mar 1982 A
4322225 Bellinger et al. Mar 1982 A
4356014 Higgins Oct 1982 A
4368061 Mestrallet et al. Jan 1983 A
4404008 Rentler et al. Sep 1983 A
4430103 Gray et al. Feb 1984 A
4445916 Newton May 1984 A
4445917 Chiu May 1984 A
4453958 Gulsby et al. Jun 1984 A
4507133 Khan et al. Mar 1985 A
4519824 Huebel May 1985 A
4525185 Newton Jun 1985 A
4545795 Liu et al. Oct 1985 A
4592766 Kumman et al. Jun 1986 A
4596588 Cook Jun 1986 A
4600421 Kummann Jul 1986 A
4617039 Buck Oct 1986 A
4657571 Gazzi Apr 1987 A
4676812 Kummann Jun 1987 A
4687499 Aghili Aug 1987 A
4688399 Reimann Aug 1987 A
4689063 Paradowski et al. Aug 1987 A
4690702 Paradowski et al. Sep 1987 A
4698081 Aghili Oct 1987 A
4705549 Sapper Nov 1987 A
4707170 Tyres et al. Nov 1987 A
4710214 Sharma et al. Dec 1987 A
4711651 Sharma et al. Dec 1987 A
4718927 Bauer et al. Jan 1988 A
4720294 Lucadamo et al. Jan 1988 A
4738699 Apffel Apr 1988 A
4746342 DeLong et al. May 1988 A
4752312 Prible Jun 1988 A
4755200 Liu et al. Jul 1988 A
4793841 Burr Dec 1988 A
4851020 Montgomery, IV Jul 1989 A
4854955 Campbell et al. Aug 1989 A
4869740 Campbell et al. Sep 1989 A
4881960 Ranke et al. Nov 1989 A
4889545 Campbell et al. Dec 1989 A
4895584 Buck et al. Jan 1990 A
RE33408 Khan et al. Oct 1990 E
4966612 Bauer Oct 1990 A
4970867 Herron et al. Nov 1990 A
5114451 Rambo et al. May 1992 A
5114541 Bayer May 1992 A
5255528 Dao Oct 1993 A
5275005 Campbell et al. Jan 1994 A
5282507 Tongu et al. Feb 1994 A
5291736 Paradowski Mar 1994 A
5316628 Collin et al. May 1994 A
5325673 Durr et al. Jul 1994 A
5335504 Durr et al. Aug 1994 A
5339654 Cook et al. Aug 1994 A
5363655 Kikkawa et al. Nov 1994 A
5365740 Kikkawa et al. Nov 1994 A
5367884 Phillips et al. Nov 1994 A
5410885 Smolarek et al. May 1995 A
5421165 Paradowski et al. Jun 1995 A
5537827 Low et al. Jul 1996 A
5546764 Mehra Aug 1996 A
5555748 Campbell et al. Sep 1996 A
5566554 Vijayaraghavan et al. Oct 1996 A
5568737 Campbell et al. Oct 1996 A
5600969 Low Feb 1997 A
5615561 Houshmand et al. Apr 1997 A
5651269 Prevost et al. Jul 1997 A
5669234 Houser et al. Sep 1997 A
5675054 Manley et al. Oct 1997 A
5685170 Sorensen Nov 1997 A
5713216 Erickson Feb 1998 A
5737940 Yao et al. Apr 1998 A
5755114 Foglietta May 1998 A
5755115 Manley May 1998 A
5771712 Campbell et al. Jun 1998 A
5799507 Wilkinson et al. Sep 1998 A
5881569 Campbell et al. Mar 1999 A
5890377 Foglietta Apr 1999 A
5890378 Rambo et al. Apr 1999 A
5893274 Nagelvoort et al. Apr 1999 A
5942164 Tran Aug 1999 A
5950453 Bowen et al. Sep 1999 A
5970742 Agrawal et al. Oct 1999 A
5983664 Campbell et al. Nov 1999 A
5992175 Yao et al. Nov 1999 A
6014869 Elion et al. Jan 2000 A
6016665 Cole et al. Jan 2000 A
6023942 Thomas et al. Feb 2000 A
6053007 Victory et al. Apr 2000 A
6062041 Kikkawa et al. May 2000 A
6077985 Stork Jun 2000 A
6116050 Yao et al. Sep 2000 A
6119479 Roberts et al. Sep 2000 A
6125653 Shu et al. Oct 2000 A
6182469 Campbell et al. Feb 2001 B1
6237365 Trebble May 2001 B1
6244070 Lee et al. Jun 2001 B1
6250105 Kimble Jun 2001 B1
6269655 Roberts et al. Aug 2001 B1
6272882 Hodges et al. Aug 2001 B1
6308531 Roberts et al. Oct 2001 B1
6324867 Fanning et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336344 O'Brien Jan 2002 B1
6347532 Agrawal et al. Feb 2002 B1
6361582 Pinnau et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363744 Finn et al. Apr 2002 B2
6367286 Price Apr 2002 B1
6401486 Lee et al. Jun 2002 B1
6417420 Stewart et al. Jul 2002 B1
6453698 Jain et al. Sep 2002 B2
6516631 Trebble Feb 2003 B1
6526777 Campbell et al. Mar 2003 B1
6550274 Agrawal Apr 2003 B1
6564579 McCartney May 2003 B1
6565626 Baker et al. May 2003 B1
6578379 Paradowski Jun 2003 B2
6604380 Reddick et al. Aug 2003 B1
6694775 Higginbotham et al. Feb 2004 B1
6712880 Foglietta Mar 2004 B2
6742358 Wilkinson et al. Jun 2004 B2
6889523 Wilkinson et al. May 2005 B2
6907752 Schroeder et al. Jun 2005 B2
6915662 Wilkinson et al. Jul 2005 B2
6941771 Reddick et al. Sep 2005 B2
6945075 Wilkinson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6986266 Narinsky Jan 2006 B2
7010937 Wilkinson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7069743 Prim Jul 2006 B2
7107788 Patel et al. Sep 2006 B2
7155931 Wilkinson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7159417 Foglietta et al. Jan 2007 B2
7165423 Winningham Jan 2007 B2
7191617 Cuellar et al. Mar 2007 B2
7204100 Wilkinson et al. Apr 2007 B2
7210311 Wilkinson et al. May 2007 B2
7216507 Cuellar et al. May 2007 B2
7219513 Mostafa May 2007 B1
7273542 Duhon et al. Sep 2007 B2
7278281 Fang et al. Oct 2007 B2
7310971 Eaton et al. Dec 2007 B2
7316127 Huebel et al. Jan 2008 B2
7357003 Ohara et al. Apr 2008 B2
7475566 Schroeder et al. Jan 2009 B2
7565815 Wilkinson et al. Jul 2009 B2
7631516 Cuellar et al. Dec 2009 B2
7666251 Shah et al. Feb 2010 B2
7713497 Mak May 2010 B2
7714180 Duhon et al. May 2010 B2
7793517 Patel et al. Sep 2010 B2
8156758 Denton et al. Apr 2012 B2
8434325 Martinez et al. May 2013 B2
8590340 Pitman et al. Nov 2013 B2
8667812 Cuellar et al. Mar 2014 B2
8794029 Yokohata et al. Aug 2014 B2
8794030 Martinez et al. Aug 2014 B2
8850849 Martinez et al. Oct 2014 B2
8881549 Johnke et al. Nov 2014 B2
8919148 Wilkinson et al. Dec 2014 B2
9021831 Johnke et al. May 2015 B2
9021832 Pierce et al. May 2015 B2
9052136 Johnke et al. Jun 2015 B2
9052137 Johnke et al. Jun 2015 B2
9057558 Johnke et al. Jun 2015 B2
9068774 Johnke et al. Jun 2015 B2
9074814 Johnke Jul 2015 B2
9080810 Pitman et al. Jul 2015 B2
9080811 Johnke et al. Jul 2015 B2
9476639 Martinez et al. Oct 2016 B2
9637428 Hudson May 2017 B2
9740147 Lynch et al. Oct 2017 B2
9790147 Lynch et al. Oct 2017 B2
9927171 Hudson et al. Mar 2018 B2
9933207 Johnke et al. Apr 2018 B2
9939195 Johnke et al. Apr 2018 B2
9939196 Johnke et al. Apr 2018 B2
20010008073 Finn et al. Jul 2001 A1
20020166336 Wilkinson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030005722 Wilkinson et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030158458 Prim Aug 2003 A1
20040079107 Wilkinson et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040172967 Patel et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050061029 Narinsky Mar 2005 A1
20050155381 Yang et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050229634 Huebel et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050247078 Wilkinson et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050268649 Wilkinson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060032269 Cellar et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060086139 Eaton et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060130521 Patel Jun 2006 A1
20060260355 Roberts et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060283207 Pitman et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070001322 Aikhorin et al. Jan 2007 A1
20080000265 Cuellar et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080078205 Cuellar et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080141712 Verma Jun 2008 A1
20080190136 Pitman et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080271480 Mak Nov 2008 A1
20080282731 Cuellar et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090107174 Ambari et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090107175 Patel et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090113930 Patel et al. May 2009 A1
20090282865 Martinez et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090293538 Wilkinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100251764 Johnke et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100275647 Johnke et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287982 Martinez et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287983 Johnke et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287984 Johnke et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100326134 Johnke et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110067441 Martinez et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110067442 Martinez et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110067443 Martinez Mar 2011 A1
20110226011 Johnke et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110226013 Johnke et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110232328 Johnke et al. Sep 2011 A1
20130125582 Martinez et al. May 2013 A1
20150073194 Hudson et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150073195 Lynch et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150073196 Miller et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150253074 Pitman et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160069610 Anguiano et al. Mar 2016 A1
20180058755 Hudson et al. Mar 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
0182643 May 1986 EP
1114808 Jul 2001 EP
1535846 Aug 1968 FR
2102931 Feb 1983 GB
1606828 Oct 1986 SU
9923428 May 1999 WO
9937962 Jul 1999 WO
0033006 Jun 2000 WO
0034724 Jun 2000 WO
0188447 Nov 2001 WO
0214763 Feb 2002 WO
2002101307 Dec 2002 WO
2004076946 Sep 2004 WO
2004080936 Sep 2004 WO
2004109180 Dec 2004 WO
2005015100 Feb 2005 WO
2005035692 Apr 2005 WO
2007001669 Jan 2007 WO
2008066570 Jun 2008 WO
2009010558 Jan 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (104)
Entry
Lynch et al., Retrofitting the Williams Energy Services Ignacio Plant for Higher Throughput and Recovery, 78th Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Mar. 3, 1999.
Lynch et al., Retrofit of the Amerada Hess Sea Robin Plant for Very High Ethane Recovery, Gas Processors Association 84th Annual Convention, Mar. 13-16, 2005.
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,670, filed Oct. 24, 2016.
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,706, filed Oct. 24, 2016.
Amendment filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,693, dated Apr. 4, 2016 (146 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,693, dated Jul. 12, 2016 (29 pages).
Amendment and Declaration filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,993, dated May 18, 2016 (71 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,993, dated Sep. 8, 2016 (26 pages).
Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,472, dated May 16, 2016 (47 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,472, dated Aug. 23, 2016 (18 pages).
Amendment filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,259, dated May 17, 2016 (40 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,259, dated Aug. 23, 2016 (15 pages).
Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,136, dated May 17, 2016 (32 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,136, dated Aug. 22, 2016 (10 pages).
Amendment and Declaration filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/869,139, dated May 9, 2016 (54 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/869,139, dated Aug. 23, 2016 (17 pages).
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/259,891 filed Sep. 8, 2016.
Amendment filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,693, dated Jan. 12, 2017 (150 pages).
Amendment and Declaration filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,993, dated Mar. 8, 2017 (47 pages).
Amendment and Declaration filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,472, dated Feb. 23, 2017 (75 pages).
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,472, dated Mar. 13, 2017 (4 pages).
Amendment and Declaration filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,259, dated Feb. 23, 2017 (69 pages).
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,259, dated Mar. 15, 2017 (4 pages).
Amendment and Declaration filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,136, dated Feb. 22, 2017 (65 pages).
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,136, dated Mar. 13, 2017 (4 pages).
Amendment and Declaration filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/869,139, dated Feb. 23, 2017 (29 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,083, dated Dec. 29, 2016 (6 pages).
Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,083, dated Mar. 10, 2017 (3 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,069, dated Dec. 30, 2016 (6 pages).
Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,069, dated Mar. 10, 2017 (3 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,693, dated Apr. 10, 2017 (33 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,472, dated Mar. 24, 2017 (33 pages).
Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,472, dated Apr. 7, 2017 (86 pages).
Advisory Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,472, dated May 12, 2017 (3 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,259, dated Mar. 27, 2017 (23 pages).
Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,259, dated Apr. 12, 2017 (76 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,136 dated Mar. 27, 2017 (19 pages).
Statement of Substance of Interview filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,136, dated Apr. 13, 2017 (9 pages).
Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,136, dated Apr. 18, 2017 (67 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US17/45460 dated Oct. 27, 2017—17 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US17/45457 dated Nov. 6, 2017—17 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US17/45454 dated Oct. 25, 2017—17 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US18/34615 dated Aug. 29, 2018—16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US18/34624 dated Aug. 29, 2018—16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/062402 dated Feb. 25, 2011—11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US07/76199 dated Mar. 3, 2008—33 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2008/052154 dated Oct. 14, 2008—24 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US06/18932 dated Sep. 26,2007—8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2008/079984 dated Dec. 19, 2008—6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/034732 dated Jul. 15, 2010—11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/046953 dated Oct. 25, 2010—14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/046966 dated Oct. 15,2010—20 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/046967 dated Oct. 20, 2010—6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/029409 dated May 17, 2011—14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/038303 dated September 2,2011—9 pages.
FIG. 16-33 on p. 16-24 of the Engineering Data Book, Twelfth Edition, published by the Gas Processors Suppliers Association (2004).
Huang et al., “Select the Optimum Extraction Method for LNG Regasification; Varying Energy Compositions of LNG mports may Require Terminal Operators to Remove C2+ Compounds before Injecting Regasified LNG into Pipelines,” Hydrocarbon Processing, 83, 57-62, Jul. 2004.
Yang et al., “Cost-Effective Design Reduces C2 and C3 at LNG Receiving Terminals,” Oil and Gas Journal, 50-53, May 26, 2003.
Finn et al., “LNG Technology for Offshore and Mid-Scale Plants,” Proceedings of the Seventy-Ninth Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, pp. 429-450, Atlanta, Georgia, Mar. 13-15, 2000.
Kikkawa et al., “Optimize the Power System of Baseload LNG Plant,” Proceedings of the Eightieth Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, San Antonio, Texas, Mar. 12-14, 2001.
Price, Brian C., “LNG Production for Peak Shaving Operations,” Proceedings of the Seventy-Eighth Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, pp. 273-280, Nashville, Tennessee, Mar. 1-3, 1999.
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,348, dated Feb. 20, 2015 (4 pages).
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,792, dated Mar. 6, 2015 (4 pages).
Amendment, Statement of Interview, and Petition for Extension of Time filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,616, dated Nov. 6, 2014 (30 pages).
Supplemental Notice of Allowability issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,616, dated Feb. 10, 2015 (12 pages).
Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,616, dated Mar. 3, 2015 (7 pages).
Response and Statement of Interview filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,575, dated Mar. 16, 2015 (37 pages).
Response and Statement of Interview filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,348, dated Mar. 17, 2015 (37 pages).
Response and Statement of Interview filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,792, dated Mar. 18, 2015 (37 pages).
Response, Statement of Interview and Petition for Extension of Time filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/051,682, dated Mar. 19, 2015 (37 pages).
Response, Statement of Interview and Petition for Extension of Time filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/048,315, dated Mar. 20, 2015 (93 pages).
Amendment and Statement of Interview filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,348, dated Mar. 26, 2015 (23 pages).
Amendment and Statement of Interview filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/051,682, dated Mar. 26, 2015 (29 pages).
Amendment and Statement of Interview filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,792, dated Mar. 26, 2015 (25 pages).
Amendment and Statement of Interview filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,575, dated Mar. 26, 2015 (20 pages).
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,616, dated Jan. 9, 2015 (15 pages).
Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,616, dated Jan. 30, 2015 (8 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,348, dated Dec. 17, 2014 (13 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/051,682, dated Dec. 18, 2014 (13 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,792, dated Dec. 18, 2014 (20 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,575, dated Dec. 16, 2014 (16 pages).
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,616, dated Nov. 28, 2014 (3 pages).
Submission Under 37 C.F.R. §1.114, Statement of Interview, and Petition for Extension of Time filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,616, dated Dec. 8, 2014 (39 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/028872 dated May 18, 2011—7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/29234 dated May 20, 2011—30 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/029034 dated Jul. 27, 2011—40 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/029409 dated May 17, 2011—15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/029239 dated May 20, 2011—21 pages.
E. Ross Mowrey, “Efficient, High Recovery of Liquids From Natural Gas Utilizing a High Pressure Absorber,” Proceedings of the Eighty-First Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Dallas, Texas, Mar. 11-13, 2002.
“Dew Point Control Gas Conditioning Units,” SME Products Brochure, Gas Processors Assoc. Conference (Apr. 5, 2009).
“Fuel Gas Conditioning Units for Compressor Engines,” SME Products Brochure, Gas Processors Assoc. Conference (Apr. 5, 2009).
“P&ID Fuel Gas Conditioner,” Drawing No. SMEP-901, Date Drawn: Aug. 29, 2007, SME, available at http//www.sme-llc.com/sme.cfm?a=prd&catID=58&subID=44&prdID=155 (Apr. 24, 2009).
“Fuel Gas Conditioner Preliminary Arrangement,” Drawing No. SMP-1007-00, Date Drawn: Nov. 11, 2008, SME, available at http://www.sme-llc.com/sme.cfm?a=prd&catID=58&subID=44&prdID=155 (Apr. 24, 2009).
“Product: Fuel Gas Conditioning Units,” SME Associates, LLC, available at http://www.smellc.com/sme.cfm?a=prd&catID=58&subID=44&prdID=155 (Apr. 24, 2009).
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/21364 dated Mar. 29, 2010—20 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/26185 dated Jul. 9, 2010—20 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2010/29331 dated Jul. 2, 2010—15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/33374 dated July 9, 2010—18 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/35121 dated Jul. 19, 2010—18 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/37098 dated Aug. 17, 2010—12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US14/51544 dated Nov. 24, 2014—16 pages.
Huebel, R., et al., “New NGL-Recovery Process Provides Viable Alternative”, Oil & Gas Journal, Jan. 9, 2012 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US14/51547 dated Nov. 24, 2014—21 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US14/51548 dated Nov. 25, 2014—24 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180347898 A1 Dec 2018 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62674928 May 2018 US
62513860 Jun 2017 US