The present invention relates to a hydroelectric turbine recovery system, and in particular a system that significantly reduces the complexity of recovering a base mounted hydroelectric turbine from a deployment site on the seabed or the like.
Due to the environmental damage that has been inflicted on the planet as a result of the burning of fossil fuels, renewable energy has finally begun to be given significant attention, with many projects being developed around solar energy, wind energy, and tidal power. Of these alternative forms of energy, tidal power is arguably the most attractive, given that tidal flows are entirely predictable and constant, unlike wind or solar energy which are relatively intermittent and therefore less dependable.
However, harnessing tidal energy does provide its own challenges, in particular with respect to the installation, maintenance and retrieval of tidal power generators, for example hydro-electric turbines, which by the very nature of the operation of same must be located in relatively fast flowing tidal currents, and more than likely located on the seabed. In addition, in order to be economically viable these turbines must be built on a large scale. As a result the turbines and associated bases/supports are large components, and require heavy lifting and transport equipment in order to achieve both deployment and recovery thereof. The use of such heavy lifting equipment is normally a hazardous undertaking, and is rendered even more dangerous when this equipment is operated at sea under difficult and unsteady conditions.
The above processes are further complicated by an increasing shortage in the market of suitable vessels and equipment to perform such work and the extreme danger of engaging divers in high tidal flow sites.
DE102008032625 discloses a lifting device for a turbine generator unit that is adapted to lift a turbine off a seabed mounted base with the base being left fixed on the seabed. The device has an immersion component (1) comprising a transverse centering device (9) and a gripping device (10). The transverse centering device comprises movable enclosure elements that are opened outwardly while the lifting device is brought into position about the generator unit, and are then closed in order to centre the lifting device relative to a turbine generator unit (2). The turbine generator unit can then be lifted off the base, which remains in position on the seabed.
The present invention has therefore been developed with a view to simplifying the recovery of a base mounted hydroelectric turbine system, and in particular reducing the complexity and the time taken to effect recovery of the base and turbine, as a single unit, from the seabed.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a hydroelectric turbine recovery system for recovering a base mounted hydroelectric turbine, the system comprising a frame having an opening permitting the frame to be advanced around the turbine via the opening; characterised in that the frame comprises a plurality of couplers engagable with the base.
Preferably, the base comprises corresponding couplers engagable with the plurality of couplers on the frame.
Preferably, the couplers on the frame and the couplers on the base are arranged to be brought into registration through vertical movement relative to one another.
Preferably, the frame is substantially U shaped.
Preferably, the frame comprises one or more guides to assist in aligning the frame with the base.
Preferably, the one or more guides are immovably fixed in position.
Preferably, at least one of the guides comprises a buffer positioned to engage the turbine and/or base when the frame is substantially aligned with the base in order to arrest further displacement of the fame relative to the base.
Preferably, the buffer comprising a cross member extending between a pair of opposed arms of the frame.
Preferably, the buffer is resiliently deformable in order to prevent damage to the turbine and/or base on contact therewith.
Preferably, the couplers on the frame each comprise a hydraulically actuated lifting tool and the couplers on the base each comprise a corresponding dock within which the lifting tool is reversibly lockable.
Preferably, the couplers on the frame and/or base are secured by mountings which permit limited displacement of the couplers.
Preferably, the system comprises one or more sensors operable to detect contact and correct alignment between the frame and the turbine and/or base.
Preferably, the system comprises one or more imaging sensors.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of recovering a base mounted hydroelectric turbine from the seabed, the method comprising the steps of:
lowering a recovery frame having an opening from a deployment vessel into a position laterally adjacent the base mounted turbine;
advancing the frame around the turbine via the opening;
coupling the frame to the base; and
lifting the base and turbine off the seabed as a single unit.
Preferably, the method comprises, prior to the step of coupling the frame to the base, substantially vertically lowering the frame into engagement with the base.
Preferably, the method comprises the step of:
arresting the lateral displacement of the frame, when substantially aligned with the base, through contact with the turbine of a buffer mounted to the frame.
Preferably, the method comprises, in the step of coupling the frame to the base, inserting a plurality of couplers on the frame into a corresponding plurality of couplers on the base.
Preferably, the method comprises the step of performing the method in a running tide; and positioning the recovery frame down tide of the turbine prior to lowering the frame into position laterally adjacent the turbine.
Preferably, the method comprises the step of providing power to the recovery frame via a power cable connected between the deployment vessel and the frame; and managing the cable by positioning the cable in the water down tide of the frame.
Referring now to the accompanying drawings there is illustrated a hydroelectric turbine recovery system, generally indicated as 10, for use in retrieving a hydroelectric turbine T and base B, in a single operation, from a deployment site on the seabed or the like.
The recovery system 10 comprises a frame 12 that is suspended beneath a deployment vessel such as a barge (not shown) or the like and can be raised and lowered relative to the barge on a number of guidelines 14. The guidelines 14 may also carry power, whether electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or the like, from the barge to the frame 12, for reasons set out hereinafter. It is however preferred that a dedicated power line or umbilical (not shown) is provided between the deployment vessel and the frame 12. Each of the guidelines 14 is preferably wound onto a suitable winch or the like located on the barge, in order to allow the frame 12 to be raised and lowered relative to the barge. The frame 12, in the embodiment illustrated, is manufactured from tubular steel, although it will be appreciated that the materials and design of the frame 12 may vary once retaining the underlying functionality as described hereinafter.
Referring in particular to
The recovery system 10 additionally comprises three couplers 28 provided on and projecting vertically downward from the frame 12, one at the free end of each of the arms 16 and the remaining coupler 28 at the apex 18. The base B is provided with co-operating and correspondingly positioned couplers 30 which form an integral part of the base B, and are therefore capable of bearing the combined load of the turbine T and base B as the two are being raised from the seabed, again as will be described in detail hereinafter. The couplers 30 on the base are preferably in the form of a cylindrical sleeve into which the couplers 28 may be located and then locked in position as described below. In the embodiment illustrated the couplers 30 are defined by and formed in the legs of the base B, although it will be appreciated that the position of each of the couplers 30 may be varied depending on the overall design and/or dimensions of the base B.
In the embodiment illustrated the couplers 28 on the frame 12 each comprise a lifting tool 28 comprising a cylindrical gripping member 32 which projects vertically downwards from the arm 16 of the frame 12. The gripping member 32 comprises an array of gripping elements (not shown) covering a substantial area of the outer surface of the gripping member 32, and which may be displaced outwardly to stand proud of said surface, preferably via hydraulic actuation. In use each of the gripping members 32 is positioned internally of the respective coupler 30 provided on the base B, and the gripping elements (not shown) are then displaced outwardly in order to engage and grip the interior surface of said coupler 30. The hydraulic or other power to effect operation of the lifting tools 28 may be provided from the barge (not shown) via the guidelines 14 or secondary lines (not shown), but preferably via a dedicated power cable or umbilical (not shown). The open upper end of the couplers 30 may taper outwardly to define a funnel shaped opening via which the gripping member 32 are introduced, in order to assist in guiding the gripping members 32 into the couplers 30. It is envisaged that the lifting tools 28 and/or the couplers 30 may be secured to the frame 12 or base B via floating mountings (not shown) which will allow some play in order to reduce the accuracy required to effect registration of the lifting tools 28 with the couplers 30.
Turning then to the operation of the recovery system 10, the frame 12 is initially fastened directly to the underside of the barge, at a suitable location such as a dock or the like. The power cable or umbilical (not shown) may then be connected between the deployment vessel and the frame 12, which during the recovery operation will provide power to the lifting tools 28, in addition to any sensors on board the frame 12. The barge is then transported to the deployment site of the turbine T and base B, whether being towed by a tug (not shown) or under its own power source. The exact position of the turbine T is known, and is maintained using GPS and a marker buoy for reference or by Dynamic Positioning (DP) on the surface of the sea above the deployment site. The barge can then be accurately positioned relative to the turbine T, in order to begin recovery of both the turbine T and base B in a single operation.
On reaching the turbine T the barge is preferably positioned slightly downstream or down tide of the turbine T and base B relative to the direction of tidal flow. The frame 12 is then lowered on the guidelines 14 until the frame 12 is at the same horizontal co-ordinate as the turbine T, and as illustrated in
At this point the barge, with the frame 12 suspended therebeneath, is advanced towards the turbine T and base B, preferably in a direction substantially parallel with the longitudinal axis L of the frame 12, and with the mouth 22 leading. The frame 12 may be advanced by advancing the tug to which the barge is tied, or as an alternative the tug may be correctly positioned and then winch the barge and frame upstream. It is preferable that the frame 12 is provided with a number of sensors (not shown) for monitoring the position/condition of the frame 12 during the recovery operation. These sensors may be in the form of one or more cameras or imaging sonar, in order to provide visual feedback during the operation, even when the water is not clear, has high turbidity, or during night time operations.
The frame 12 will thus slowly approach the turbine T, and if there is any misalignment between the two the pair of guides 20, which are only illustrated in
At this point the barge is halted and maintained in position directly above the turbine T and base B. The guidelines 14 are then used to slowly lower the frame 12 in the vertical direction, whereby each of the lifting tools will be inserted into the respective coupler 30 on the base B, as illustrated in
It is envisaged that the vertical orientation of the couplers 28, 30 could be altered, for example being in a horizontal orientation. With such an arrangement it would then only be necessary to advance the frame 12 horizontally into engagement with the base 12, although a greater degree of accuracy in the initial horizontal positioning of the frame 12 would be required. It should also be appreciated that the lifting tools 28 and corresponding couplers 30 could be substituted with any other suitable means of connecting and securing the frame 12 to the base B, for example using hooks, collets, or other forms of mechanical fasteners. It is also to be understood that while the system 10 of the embodiment illustrated is designed to recover a triangular base B, and is thus comprises of three lifting tools 28, the system 10 may be reconfigured to recovery alternative styles of base, for example a rectangular base or the like, and may therefore comprise more or less that the three lifting tools 28 of the embodiment illustrated.
The frame 12 is now securely locked to the base B, and on which the turbine T is itself fixed. The winches can now be reversed in order to haul up the guidelines 14, thereby lifting the turbine T and base B as a single unit, off the seabed. It may be necessary to lift each leg of the base B individually in order to help break any settling effects at the legs. This can be achieved by individually raising each guideline 14 until the respective leg breaks free of the seabed, at which point that leg can then be lowered back down and the next leg then raised. Once all of the legs have been freed from the seabed the frame 12 is preferably raised fully against the underside of the barge, which is designed to allow the turbine T to pass upwardly through an opening therein. At this point the frame 12 is safely secured to the barge, which can then transport the base B and turbine T ashore.
It will thus be appreciated that by using an open sided frame having a mouth 22 to accept the turbine T, and the provision of the guides 20 and cross member 26, the frame 12 can be positioned and secured to the base B with relative ease and without the requirement for divers or other personnel to be on the seabed during the operation. As a result the turbine T and base B can be recovered as a single unit, avoiding the need to separate the two while on the seabed. This also ensures that once transported ashore, the turbine T is still fixed to the base B, and so the turbine T can remain fully supported by the base B on land, where an inspection and/or suitable repairs can then be made. This avoids the requirement for transferring the turbine T to a separate support, which would be a difficult and time consuming operation, and increases the risk of damage to the turbine T.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10190576 | Nov 2010 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/069623 | 11/8/2011 | WO | 00 | 8/27/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/062739 | 5/18/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
228467 | Maclay | Jun 1880 | A |
928536 | Pino | Jul 1909 | A |
1710103 | Nelson | Apr 1929 | A |
2054142 | Sharp | Sep 1936 | A |
2470797 | Thomas | May 1949 | A |
2501696 | Souczek | Mar 1950 | A |
2563279 | Rushing | Aug 1951 | A |
2658453 | Walters | Nov 1953 | A |
2782321 | Fischer | Feb 1957 | A |
2792505 | Baudry | May 1957 | A |
2874547 | Fiore | Feb 1959 | A |
3078680 | Wapsala | Feb 1963 | A |
3209156 | Struble, Jr. | Sep 1965 | A |
3292023 | Korber | Dec 1966 | A |
3342444 | Nelson | Sep 1967 | A |
3355998 | Roemisch | Dec 1967 | A |
3384787 | Schwartz | May 1968 | A |
3422275 | Braikevitch et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3433024 | Diamond et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3477236 | Burrus | Nov 1969 | A |
3487805 | Satterthwaite et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3603386 | Talley, Jr. | Sep 1971 | A |
3708251 | Pierro | Jan 1973 | A |
3986787 | Mouton, Jr. et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3987638 | Burkhardt et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4095918 | Mouton et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4163904 | Skendrovic | Aug 1979 | A |
4219303 | Mouton, Jr. et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4274009 | Parker, Sr. | Jun 1981 | A |
4367413 | Nair | Jan 1983 | A |
4421990 | Heuss et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4427897 | Migliori | Jan 1984 | A |
4496845 | Ensign et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4523878 | Richart et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4541367 | Lindberg | Sep 1985 | A |
4541755 | Castel | Sep 1985 | A |
4613762 | Soderholm | Sep 1986 | A |
4720640 | Anderson | Jan 1988 | A |
4740711 | Sato et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4744697 | Coppens | May 1988 | A |
4744698 | Dallimer et al. | May 1988 | A |
4810135 | Davenport et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4867605 | Myers et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868408 | Hesh | Sep 1989 | A |
4868970 | Schultz et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4990810 | Newhouse | Feb 1991 | A |
5495221 | Post | Feb 1996 | A |
5592816 | Williams | Jan 1997 | A |
5606791 | Fougere et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609441 | Khachaturian | Mar 1997 | A |
5656880 | Clark | Aug 1997 | A |
5662434 | Khachaturian | Sep 1997 | A |
5715590 | Fougere et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5800093 | Khachaturian | Sep 1998 | A |
5998905 | Fougere et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6039506 | Khachaturian | Mar 2000 | A |
6109863 | Milliken | Aug 2000 | A |
6113314 | Campbell | Sep 2000 | A |
6166472 | Pinkerton | Dec 2000 | A |
6168373 | Vauthier | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6232681 | Johnston et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242840 | Denk et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6293734 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300689 | Smalser | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309179 | Holden | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6367399 | Khachaturian | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6406251 | Vauthier | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409466 | Lamont | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6445099 | Roseman | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476709 | Wuidart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6612781 | Jackson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6648589 | Williams | Nov 2003 | B2 |
RE38336 | Williams | Dec 2003 | E |
6729840 | Williams | May 2004 | B2 |
6756695 | Hibbs et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770987 | Sogard et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6777851 | Maslov | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6806586 | Wobben | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6840713 | Schia et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6843191 | Makotinsky | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6857821 | Steenhuis et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6957947 | Williams | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7190087 | Williams | Mar 2007 | B2 |
D543495 | Williams | May 2007 | S |
7223137 | Sosnowski | May 2007 | B1 |
7275891 | Owen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7352078 | Gehring | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7378750 | Williams | May 2008 | B2 |
7425772 | Novo Vidal | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7471009 | Davis et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7527006 | Khachaturian | May 2009 | B2 |
7611307 | Owen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7845296 | Khachaturian | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7874788 | Stothers et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7976245 | Finnigan | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8022581 | Stiesdal | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8308422 | Williams | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8310077 | Pearce | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8350400 | Rosefsky | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8466595 | Spooner | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020034437 | Williams | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020062644 | Rosefsky | May 2002 | A1 |
20020088222 | Vauthier | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030044272 | Addie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030137149 | Northrup et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030155829 | McMullen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030168864 | Heronemus et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030193198 | Wobben | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030218338 | O'Sullivan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040021386 | Swett | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040021437 | Maslov et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040201299 | Naritomi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227500 | O'Meara | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232792 | Erfourth | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040262926 | Hansen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005592 | Fielder | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031442 | Williams | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060261597 | Gehring | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070018459 | Williams | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070063448 | Kowalczyk | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070164626 | Taniguchi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070231072 | Jennings et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070241566 | Kuehnle | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070262668 | Brisson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070291426 | Kasunich et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080012538 | Stewart et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090162144 | Ayre | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090278357 | Williams | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100068037 | Ives | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100133838 | Borgen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148513 | Susman | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172698 | Ives et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100201129 | Holstein et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232885 | Ives et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100295388 | Ives et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110018274 | Ives et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110088253 | Ives et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110770 | Spooner et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110155682 | Grassow | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110291419 | Dunne et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110293399 | Dunne et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298216 | Ives et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304148 | Dunne et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305518 | Pearce et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120027522 | Ives et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120175877 | Ives et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120187680 | Spooner et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120235412 | Dunne et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120280506 | Ives et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140102189 | Dunne et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2388513 | Aug 2000 | CA |
2352673 | Jan 2003 | CA |
260699 | Apr 1947 | CH |
146935 | Aug 1983 | CH |
3116740 | Nov 1982 | DE |
3638129 | May 1988 | DE |
3718954 | Dec 1988 | DE |
19948198 | Apr 2001 | DE |
10101405 | Jul 2002 | DE |
20308901 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10244038 | Apr 2004 | DE |
102007016380 | Oct 2008 | DE |
102008032625 | Aug 2009 | DE |
102008020965 | Oct 2009 | DE |
1318299 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1564455 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1691377 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1876350 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1878912 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1878913 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1879280 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1878911 | Sep 2008 | EP |
1980670 | Oct 2008 | EP |
1992741 | Nov 2008 | EP |
1885047 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2088311 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2110910 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2112370 | Oct 2009 | EP |
1980746 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2199199 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2199598 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2199599 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2199601 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2199602 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2199603 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2200170 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2071709 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2209175 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2241749 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2302204 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2302755 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2302766 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2823177 | Oct 2002 | FR |
2880389 | Jan 2005 | FR |
2859495 | Mar 2005 | FR |
204505 | Oct 1923 | GB |
924347 | Apr 1963 | GB |
980575 | Jan 1965 | GB |
1131352 | Oct 1968 | GB |
1413835 | Nov 1975 | GB |
2316461 | Feb 1998 | GB |
2344843 | Jun 2000 | GB |
2408294 | May 2005 | GB |
2431628 | May 2007 | GB |
2434413 | Jul 2007 | GB |
2447514 | Sep 2008 | GB |
2471257 | Dec 2010 | GB |
WO 2009127415 | Oct 2009 | IE |
59203881 | Nov 1984 | JP |
63055370 | Mar 1988 | JP |
01043908 | Feb 1989 | JP |
2000341818 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2005069025 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005248822 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006094645 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007255614 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007291882 | Nov 2007 | JP |
WO9844372 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9852819 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO9966623 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO0077393 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0134973 | May 2001 | WO |
WO0134977 | May 2001 | WO |
WO02099950 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO03014561 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO03025385 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO03046375 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO2004015264 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004027257 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004107549 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2004113717 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2005045243 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005061887 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2005078233 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2005080789 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005116443 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006029496 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2007043894 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007055585 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007083105 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2007086814 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007125349 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008004877 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008006614 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008050149 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008081187 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008110811 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO2008127114 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009016409 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2010118766 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO2011039249 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO2011039255 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO2011039267 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Megson, T.H.G. Structural and Stress Analysis. Elsevier. p. 101-113. 1996. |
International Search Report completed Feb. 15, 2012, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2011/069623. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130343869 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |