This application is a national stage application of International Application No. PCT/JP2008/057992, filed 18 Apr. 2008, which claims priority to Japanese Application No. 2007-109632, filed 18 Apr. 2007, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a method of hydroforming a metal pipe used for the production of an exhaust part, a suspension part, a body part, etc. for an automobile.
In recent years, in the automobile industry, metal pipe is increasingly being used as one means for reducing weight. Hollow metal pipe, compared with a solid material, offers the same rigidity while enabling the cross-sectional area to be reduced. Further, an integral structure of metal pipe, compared with a T-shaped structure obtained by welding two metal plates, enables a reduction of weight by the elimination of the need for a welded flange part.
However, auto parts are placed in narrow spaces in the automobiles. Therefore, metal pipe is seldom used as is as a straight pipe. It is almost always attached after being secondarily worked. As secondary working, bending is used most often, but in recent years the increasing complexity of the shapes of auto parts has led to an increase in hydroforming as well (fastening a metal pipe in a mold and, in that state, using inside pressure and axial direction compression to work the pipe into the mold shape) and, further, an increase in working comprised of these working processes overlaid. Hydroforming itself, as shown in
As the method of hydroforming with a large expansion ratio, as for example described in Japanese Patent Publication (A) No. 2002-153917, there is the method of using a movable mold to obtain a hydroformed part having a high branch pipe height. However, this method can only be applied to shapes in the case of expansion in only a certain direction such as with T-forming.
Further, Japanese Patent Publication (A) No. 2002-100318 discloses the method of expansion in one certain direction, then expansion in a direction perpendicular to that direction. If using this method, it is possible to obtain a hydroformed part expanded not only in one certain direction, but overall. However, while this can be easily applied if expanding the pipe to a simple rectangular cross-section, if a complicated cross-sectional shape, a further hydroforming step becomes necessary for finishing the part to the detailed shape. A total of three steps of hydroforming become necessary.
If performing both bending and hydroforming, in general the part is bent, then loaded into the hydroforming mold and hydroformed, but with this method, it is difficult to increase the expansion ratio of the bent part. Therefore, the method of hydroforming, then bending is also proposed in for example Japanese Patent Publication (A) No. 2002-219525. This method expands the pipe overall in the first step of hydroforming, then bends it while applying internal pressure in the second step, and finally hydroforms the part while crushing it in the direction perpendicular to the bending direction in the third step. If using this method, compared with the general method of bending, then hydroforming, it becomes possible to increase the expansion ratio of the bent part. However, the expansion ratio is limited by the limit value of the first step of hydroforming. With hydroforming expanding the pipe overall like with this method, not that large an expansion ratio can be expected.
In addition, as in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-006693, the method of hydroforming, then rotary bending has also been proposed. However, with this method, the scope of application is limited since only rotary draw bending is covered as a bending method.
As explained above, in the past, it was difficult to obtain a hydroformed part of a large expansion ratio and complicated shape. As the only method, as the method shown in Japanese Patent Publication (A) No. 2002-100318, there is the method of performing the hydroforming in three steps, but with this method, there are many steps. This is disadvantageous cost wise and production efficiency wise.
Therefore, the present invention provides a method of working a hydroformed part with a large expansion ratio and complicated shape by two hydroforming steps. Further, even when bending and hydroforming are superposed, a method obtaining a shaped part in the case of a large expansion ratio of the bent part—difficult in the past—is provided.
The present invention was made for solving the above problems and has as its gist the following:
(1) A hydroforming method loading a metal pipe into a divided mold, clamping the mold, then applying an internal pressure and pushing force in the pipe axial direction to said metal pipe, which hydroforming method characterized by, in a first hydroforming step, expanding said metal pipe in one direction of said metal pipe cross-section to obtain an intermediate product having a circumferential length of 90% to 100% of the circumferential length of the product shape in all of the expanded part in the pipe axial direction and having a height greater than the height of the product in said one direction and at least part of the pipe axial direction, then, in a second hydroforming step, reducing the height in the one direction of said intermediate product in all or part of the pipe axial direction while shaping the product to the final product shape.
(2) A hydroforming method as set forth in (1) characterized in that a radius of curvature of a cross-section of the metal pipe and a radius of curvature of a cross-section in said one direction are substantially equal.
(3) A hydroforming method as set forth in (1) or (2) characterized by using a movable mold able to freely move in the axial direction of the metal pipe and a counter punch able to freely move in a direction perpendicular to the axial direction of the metal pipe to shape the intermediate product.
(4) A hydroforming method as set forth in (1), (2), or (3) characterized by bending the intermediate product in the pipe axial direction between the first hydroforming step and second hydroforming step.
Further, in the present invention (2), the “radii of curvature being substantially equal” means the radius of curvature of the cross-section of the intermediate product is a range of 90 to 110% with respect to the radius of curvature of the stock pipe (metal pipe).
a), (b), and (c) are explanatory views of a first hydroforming step in the present invention.
a) and (b) are views showing explanatory views of the first hydroforming step for working a pipe to various shapes of intermediate products in the present invention.
a), (b) show a side view of the shape finally required (X-Y plane), a top view (X-Z plane), and cross-sectional views (Y-Z planes). When producing a product of this shape from a pipe with an outside diameter of 2r (radius r) by hydroforming, it is necessary to expand the ranges of the cross-section A-A to cross-section G-G into complicated shapes as shown in the figure. In general, with hydroforming, internal pressure inside the pipe and axial pushing from the two pipe ends are used to expand the pipe into a complicated shape, but when expanding the pipe in both the Y-direction and Z-direction like with the above shape, shaping becomes extremely difficult. In particular, this is difficult with a material with a low shapeability (material with low n value, r value, elongation, etc.) or a shape with a large expansion ratio. Shaping sometimes even becomes impossible.
In such a case, in the past, the working process was divided into several steps and the expansion ratio was gradually increased. For example, when expanding the stock pipe from the circumferential length La to the circumferential length Lc of the final product shape, the circumferential length Lb of the intermediate product shape is set to a value of an intermediate extent between La and Lc (for example, (La+Lc)/2) and the process of pipe expansion is divided into two steps. Shape wise as well, the shape of the intermediate product was generally designed to an intermediate extent between the stock pipe and the final product shape. However, in the first hydroforming step, at the time of expansion from the circumferential length La of the stock pipe to the circumferential length Lb of the intermediate product shape, work hardening has also been imparted, so heat treatment is required for removing the working strain before the second hydroforming step. Cost wise and production efficiency wise, this is extremely disadvantageous. Further, as a method not involving heat treatment, as shown in Japanese Patent Publication (A) No. 2002-100318, it may be considered to expand the pipe in the Z-direction in the first hydroforming step, then expand it in the Y-direction in the second hydroforming step, but in the case of a complicated shape as with this shape, two steps are not enough for working the pipe to the final product shape. A third hydroforming step for finishing the pipe to a more detailed shape becomes essential.
To solve the above problem, in the working method according to the present invention, first the pipe is expanded in only one direction by the first hydroforming step. In the example of the bottom view of
On the other hand, if the circumferential length of the intermediate product shape is shorter than 90% of the circumferential length of the final product shape, the ratio of expansion by the second hydroforming step rises by that extent, so the working process of the second hydroforming step becomes difficult and cracks etc.
easily occur. For this reason, the pipe has to be expanded to give a circumferential length of the intermediate product shape in the first hydroforming of the present invention of at least 90% of the final product shape. If the above procedure is used to set the circumferential length of the intermediate product shape, the result becomes as in the graph of
As a result of the above, the intermediate product shape shown in
On the other hand, when the shape of the final product has a portion expanded in only the Y-direction, naturally the height of the intermediate product becomes lower than the height of the final product.
Further, the cross-sectional top part and bottom part may be flat in shape, that is, may be rectangular cross-sections, but in this case the thickness is easily reduced near the corner parts, so this becomes disadvantageous in the case of a large expansion ratio. Therefore, as shown in the figure, it is preferable to set a radius of curvature (in the figure, r) substantially equal to the stock pipe (aspect of invention according to above (2)).
The intermediate product designed by
When the final product has a portion expanded in only the Y-direction, the intermediate product is crushed so as to reduce the height in the Y-direction in part of the expanded cross-section.
Further, when the expansion ratio is large etc., it is also possible to provide a counter punch 8 able to move in a direction perpendicular to the pipe axial direction as shown in
The intermediate product 7 hydroformed by the procedure of
Further, the pipe expansion direction of
Next, an example of interposing bending between the first hydroforming and second hydroforming will be explained (aspect of invention according to above (4)). By the same procedure as in
After this, as shown in
Finally, the bent intermediate product 16 is loaded into the second hydroforming bottom mold 12 and the mold is clamped while crushing the product by the top mold 11 at least at part of the pipe axial direction (while reducing Y-direction height), then internal pressure and axial pushing are applied. These procedures are the same as the procedure explained with reference to
Below, an example of the present invention will be shown.
As the metal pipe, steel pipe of an outside diameter of 63.5 mm, a thickness of 2.3 mm, and a total length of 400 mm was used. The steel type is STKM11A of carbon steel pipe for machine structural use. The product shape is shown in
The intermediate product designed as explained above was worked by the mold shown in
Next, the intermediate product 7 was placed in the second hydroforming bottom mold 12 shown in
By the above series of working methods, it was possible to obtain a worked part expanded by an expansion ratio of 2.00 and further in cross-section in both the Y-direction and Z-direction. Further, working could be performed by only the two steps of the first hydroforming and second hydroforming.
Next, an example of a product with a shape including bends will be explained.
The pipe is worked to the shape of the intermediate product designed above by the first hydroforming step, but the cross-sectional shapes become the same as in Example 1. Further, since a straight shape, the first hydroforming step becomes exactly the same shape as Example 1. Therefore, the mold used in the first hydroforming step of Example 1 was used to obtain the intermediate product 7 by the procedure of
Next, the intermediate product 7 was bent by three-point bending. As shown in
The intermediate product 16 obtained by the above bending was placed on a bottom mold 12 of the second hydroforming step shown in
As a result of the above series of working steps, it was possible to obtain a shaped part with a bent part with an expansion ratio of 2.00 and greatly expanded in cross-section in both the Y-direction and Z-direction.
Industrial Applicability
According to the present invention, the scope of application of hydroforming is expanded compared with the past and the types of pipe shaped parts for automobiles are increased. Due to this, automobiles can be made further lighter in weight, the fuel economy can be improved, and suppression of global warming can be contributed to as well.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2007-109632 | Apr 2007 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2008/057992 | 4/18/2008 | WO | 00 | 10/15/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/130055 | 10/30/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5802899 | Klaas et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6105409 | Kojima et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6766678 | Schulze et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7204114 | Ni et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7337641 | Bruggemann | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7464572 | Miyanaga et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484393 | Tomizawa | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7695824 | Gejima et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002-153917 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-219525 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003-88927 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003-290845 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004-255445 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2007-185697 | Jul 2007 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Jul. 15, 2008 issued in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/JP2008/057992. |
Sosei-to-Kakou, Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity 45 (524): 21-26 (2004). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100116011 A1 | May 2010 | US |