The present application relates to processing of medical instruments prior to reuse, and more particularly to pretreatment of the instruments with hydrogen peroxide foam and defoaming and deactivating the hydrogen peroxide foam.
Medical instruments after use are typically contaminated with blood and other body matter as well as potentially contaminated with infectious microorganisms. Before being reused in a future medical procedure these instruments must be washed and sterilized. The process of washing and sterilization becomes complicated when blood and other matter are allowed to dry onto the instruments. Blood in particular becomes much more difficult to remove once it has dried.
It has been suggested that after use instruments be placed into a liquid filled container to maintain moisture and prevent foreign matter thereon from drying and becoming more difficult to remove. However, such containers can be quite heavy and difficult to move and the liquid therein can become contaminated and it is not desirable to spill this liquid. One solution that has been proposed is an enzymatic foam which is prayed onto instruments after use and prior to eventual sterilization. The foam weighs less than a liquid and purports to enhance cleaning by initiating some degree of cleaning at the early stage when the foam is placed upon the instrument. Such foams provide little or no antimicrobial activity. We have found the hydrogen peroxide foam improves upon enzymatic foams having superior cleaning ability against dried blood and providing a substantial measure of antimicrobial activity to start the decontamination process and to thereby enhance its effectiveness and provide some measure of protection to personal against infection from the instruments when they are removed from the container.
The present invention further enhances protection of the user at the time of instrument removal by reducing the physical volume of the foam and by decreasing its chemical strength.
A system, according to the present invention, provides for treatment of a hydrogen peroxide foam covering a medical device. The system comprises a liquid spray comprising a defoaming agent and a neutralizing agent to inactivate hydrogen peroxide.
Preferably, the system includes instructions for use instructing a user to apply the spray to a hydrogen peroxide foam covering one or more instruments prior to handling the instruments.
Preferred defoaming agents include silicone emulsions and siloxane polymers.
Preferably, the neutralizing agent comprises a catalyst for decomposing hydrogen peroxide. Suitable catalysts include: catalase, a cobalt salt, an iodide salt, a titanium salt, a ceric salt, and a permanganate salt.
In one aspect of the invention the liquid comprises a solvent, such as methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, toluene, xylene, perchloroethylene, or water. It may further comprise an emulsifier and/or a surfactant.
The defoaming agent can comprise an organic-based defoamer, a silicone-based defoamer, or a combination thereof A method, according to the present invention, of treating an instrument after contamination of a surface thereof includes the steps of: covering the surface with a foam comprising hydrogen peroxide; subsequently, reducing volume of the foam via application of a defoaming agent to the foam; and deactivating the hydrogen peroxide via application of a neutralizing agent for hydrogen peroxide.
During a medical procedure, one or more medical instruments may be employed. These instruments become contaminated with blood, tissue and potentially contaminating microorganisms. Typically the instruments are set aside after use to await washing and sterilization. This waiting period can be several hours or much longer. During this waiting period blood and other matter which dries upon the instrument becomes much more difficult to remove during the subsequent cleaning procedure. This can be a particular problem when a procedure lasts many hours and uses many different instruments or when due to limited personnel time, it is difficult to process the instruments in a timely fashion.
Turning to the drawings, and in particular to
One method of dispensing the hydrogen peroxide foam 14 would be to spray the foam 14 from a foaming aerosol spray can 16. Such cans employing a propellant are well known to those of skill in the art. Also, the container 12 preferably includes an insert or tray 18 having a plurality of apertures therethrough to allow easy rinsing of the instruments 10 and for efficient diffusion of vapor sterilants into contact with the instruments 10 when the container 12 is used in a sterilization procedure. A lid 20 is also preferably provided.
Instruments 10 are placed into the container 12 as they are finished being used in a procedure. A quantity of foam 14 is sprayed over the instruments 10 to keep them moist and inhibit drying of blood thereon, to start dissolving the blood thereon and to disinfect the instruments. The foam 14 preferably contains between 1 to 15 percent hydrogen peroxide by weight and more preferably between about 3 to 8 percent. Such concentration may not achieve a level of sterilization sufficient for immediate reuse on a patient, but will substantially reduce the load of microorganisms on the instrument surfaces so as to minimize the chances that personal handling the instruments, especially during cleaning, will get infected from them. The lid 20 is preferably placed on the container 12 prior to transporting the instruments from the location of the procedure, such as an operating room, to the location of the washing. When the instruments 10 are ready for washing, the insert 18 can be lifted out and the foam 14 rinsed off while the instruments 10 are still in the insert 18. Normal washing and sterilization may then occur. Washing may comprise treatment with enzymatic cleansers, detergents or other cleaning agents, preferably in combination with mechanical scrubbing or agitation, including optionally treatment with water jets, ultrasonic vibration or the like. Following washing the instrument should be sterilized, preferably in the container 12, such as by chemical vapor or steam autoclaving.
It is particularly convenient if the container 12 with the insert 18 is adapted for use in the terminal sterilization such as a STERRAD® hydrogen peroxide/gas plasma system or a steam system. Suitable materials, such as liquid crystal polymers, and construction details for such containers, especially containers adaptable to either steam or hydrogen peroxide, are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,379,631 and 6,692,693 to Wu incorporated herein by reference. Such containers are typically wrapped with CSR wrap or incorporate semi-permeable membrane filters to allow sterilization of instruments therein with vapor sterilants while protecting the against ingress of potentially contaminating microorganisms after sterilization.
Turning also now to
Turning also now to
Turning also now to
Turning also now to
Turning also to
Turning also now to
Formulation 1
Formulation 2
Formulation 3
Formulation 4
Formulation 5
Formulation 6 (for ˜6% Peroxide)
Formulation 7 (for ˜3% Peroxide)
Formulation 8 (Defoaming and Neutralizing Solution)
Preferably, a defoaming solution such as Formulation 8 is provided in a spray dispenser, either manually pumped or with a propellant gas and is provided with instructions for defoaming a hydrogen peroxide foam 14 which covers instruments 10. Prior to defoaming the instruments 10 are covered by the hydrogen peroxide foam 14 making it difficult for a user to see the instruments 10 and remove them from the container 12. If the instruments 10 have sharp points or edges the user might risk injury by reaching into the foam 14 without being able to adequately see the instruments 10. Preferably, the defoaming solution comprises both a defoaming agent and agent for inactivating the hydrogen peroxide. Thus, upon spraying the defoaming solution over the foam 14 the foam's volume is reduced so that the instruments can be seen for safe removal and the concentration of hydrogen peroxide in the foam 14 is reduced to minimize any detrimental effects its contact with a user might present.
The two most common types of defoamers are organic-based defoamers such as polypropylene based polyether dispersions (Sigma antifoam 204) and fatty acid esters (Sigma antifoam 0-30), and silicone-based defoamers such as siloxane polymers (Sigma antifoams A, B, C, Y-30, SE-15). Silicone based defoamers are somewhat preferred due to the ease with which they can be cleaned from an instrument 10 compared with organic based defoamers. However, either type may be used. One appropriate defoaming agent is SILSENSE Copolyol-1 silicone which is a polyethylene glycol (organic) and dimethicone (silicone) copolyol. Additional appropriate defoaming agents include: carboxylates (organic based), monoamides (organic based), phosphoric acid esters (organic based), mineral oil blends (organic based), long chain alcohols (organic based), fluorosurfactants (organic based), hydrophobed silicon/hydrophilic oil mixtures (silicone based), Silicas (such as polydimethylsiloxane polymer with silica) (silicone based), diethylene glycol (organic based), polydiethylenemethyl silicones (silicone based).
For neutralizing hydrogen peroxide in the foam 14 catalase is preferred due to its ease of use, potent action against hydrogen peroxide, ease of removal and low toxicity. Other agents include cobalt salts, idodide salts, titanium salts, ceric salts and permanganate salts.
Formulation 9 (Foaming Mousse (3% H2O2))
Final pH = 6.1
Modified Formulation 7 (with pH Adjustor)
Final pH = 6.0
Modified Formulation 6 (with pH Adjustor)
Final pH = 5.6
Preferred Formulation
Tests
(A) Test with Fresh Blood
A drop of fresh blood, approximately four millimeters in diameter was applied to a Petri dish. One was left untreated and the other treated with a peroxide foam of formulation 7 generated with Airspray F2-L11 Finger Pump Foamer. Within ten minutes the untreated blood had dried whereas the treated blood had reacted and dissolved in the peroxide foam.
(B) Tests with Dried Blood
A drop of dried blood was treated with room temperature tap water for ten minutes and another drop of dried blood was treated with a 3% hydrogen peroxide foam of formulation 7 generated with Airspray F2-L11 Finger Pump Foamer. The drop of dried blood treated with tap water remained after ten minutes. After ten minutes, the drop of dried blood treated with the hydrogen peroxide foam had dissolved.
An additional test was conducted comparing a commercially available enzyme foam, Prepzyme XF enzyme foam, available from Ruhof Corporation of Mineola, N.Y. A drop of dried blood was treated with the Prepzyme XF and another drop of dried blood was treated with a 6% hydrogen peroxide foam of formulation 6. After ten minutes the blood treated with the Prepzyme XF remained whereas the blood treated with the hydrogen peroxide foam was dissolved within five minutes.
(C) Foam Stability Test
A foam prepared according to formulation 9 was placed into a Petri dish of dimensions 150 mm diameter and 15 mm deep. Prepzyme XF was placed into a similar Petri dish. The foams were allowed to rest for one hour whereupon they were inspected. The foam of formulation 9 maintained substantially all of its volume over the period of one hour. The Prepzyme foam had fallen to the extent that a portion of the lower surface of the Petri dish was no longer covered by foam. After four hours the foam of formulation 9 still covered the bottom surface of the Petri dish.
(D) Tests against Microorganisms
Tests of efficacy in killing microorganisms were conducted comparing both a 3% hydrogen peroxide foam prepared according to formulation 7 and 6% hydrogen peroxide foam prepared according to formulation 6 against the Prepzyme XF enzymatic foam using the following test procedure:
Efficacy Results with Duplicated Samples:
Staphylococcus
Pseudomonas
aureus
aeruginosa
In practice, instruments 10 are placed into the container 12 as they are finished being used during a medical procedure. A small amount of hydrogen peroxide foam 14 can be added over each instrument 10 as it is placed in the container 12 if there will be lengths of time in between placing instruments therein. A user may wait until all instruments 10 are in the container to apply the foam 14 and cover the instruments 10 therewith and then place the cover on the container. The foam 14 is light allowing easy transport of the container 12 with instruments 10 and foam 14 therein from the site of the procedure to the site where terminal decontamination and sterilization will occur.
When a user is ready to process the instruments the cover is removed and the defoaming solution is sprayed onto the foam 14 covering the instruments 10. The defoaming agent in the solution breaks down the physical structure of the foam 14 and the deactivating agent breaks down the hydrogen peroxide, preferably into water and oxygen. If desired, they may be rinsed in the container with fresh water or other solvent. The user then processes the instruments in their usual manner.
The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation-in-art of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/396,186 filed Mar. 31, 2006, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11396186 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 11421288 | May 2006 | US |