The invention relates to hydrogen production in a built environment, for example a building or a collection of buildings.
Power and heating for buildings has primarily been provided by hydrocarbons in the form of oil and gas, but alternatives to this approach are being sought as use of hydrocarbons for such purposes is now being steadily reduced. Electricity provision is increasingly provided from renewable sources, but this is not always the most efficient approach—local power generation would often be desirable for control and for management of cost. Hydrogen is increasingly attractive for use as a fuel, as it releases energy very efficiently and without harmful waste products. Hydrogen boilers for use in buildings are currently entering production. Electricity can also be generated from hydrogen, for example using solid oxide fuel cells.
Processes have been developed to obtain hydrogen from hydrocarbons—this has typically been done up to now in large reactors which are not suitable for use within most built environments. It would be desirable to be able to provide hydrogen into a built environment in a way that did not rely on offsite creation of hydrogen and hydrogen delivery. It would be particularly desirable to do this in a way that enabled a hydrogen production system to be integrated as effectively as possible into a built environment.
In a first aspect, the invention provides an energy provision system for a building or system of buildings, the system comprising: a hydrocarbon processing system adapted to provide a hydrogen gas output and a carbon solids output from a hydrocarbon input; wherein the hydrogen gas output is provided to one or more hydrogen consumers for providing energy; and the carbon solids output is provided to a waste water system for removing contaminants or pollutants from waste water.
This hydrocarbon processing system may comprise a pyrolysis reactor. The pyrolysis reactor may comprise a plasma torch reactor for processing hydrocarbons, wherein the plasma torch reactor has a hydrocarbon gas input and a hydrogen and carbon gas output; and a liquid metal system for receiving the hydrogen and carbon gas output from the plasma torch reactor, and for conveying the hydrogen and carbon to a separation system for providing the hydrogen gas output and the carbon solids output.
The benefits of using a liquid metal system in this way include the possibility of starting the plasma torch without need for contact or high-voltage ignition. The use of this approach also avoids carbon deposition as the carbon is carried through to the next stage of the system—this obviates the need for frequent cleaning of the torch.
The one or more hydrogen consumers may comprise a hydrogen-fired boiler, a fuel cell to provide electricity from a hydrogen input, or both. If a fuel cell is provided, an electrical system of the building or system of buildings may be configured such that electricity from the fuel cell may be provided to either the energy provision system, an electrical supply grid, or both. The hydrocarbon input may be a methane input.
In a second aspect, the invention provides a method of operating a building or a system of buildings, the method comprising: processing hydrocarbons from a hydrocarbon input to produce a hydrogen gas output and a carbon solids output; providing the hydrogen gas output to one or more hydrogen consumers for providing heating or power to the building or system of buildings; and providing the carbon solids output to a waste water system for removing contaminants or pollutants from waste water.
This approach is extremely effective for integration of hydrogen production in a built environment, as it can provide a number of additional benefits beyond the production of hydrogen. The hydrogen produced can be used by hydrogen consumers such as a hydrogen boiler for heating the building or buildings, and a fuel cell (such as a solid oxide fuel cell) for converting hydrogen to electricity for use in the building or for returning to the grid when there is an excess. The carbon produced in the process can be used directly to address the significant practical issue of waste management. The environmental impact of new developments is now assessed carefully, and the effect of groundwater contaminants (such as nitrates, nitrites and phosphates) carefully considered. By depositing carbon into the sewage supply—particularly if this is done in the form of a fine powder with a very large surface area available for interaction, but without risk of clogging drainage channels—the hydrogen production system provides a system for removal of such contaminants from waste water. The result is effectively the same as in the use of activated carbon for removal of contaminants from groundwater. Use of this approach to hydrogen generation and consumption on site can therefore be used to reduce the environmental impact of new building developments significantly.
Existing uses of carbon for treatment of groundwater generally require a significant facility—typically the relatively long residence time for removal of contaminants requires use of a large basin and the use of stirring or agitation mechanisms. The use of the sewerage system effectively provides these conditions without the need for developing a separate facility—the sewer system provides a large volume for interaction between carbon and wastewater, and the normal action of the sewerage system promotes this interaction.
For preference, methane is used as the hydrocarbon in this system. Methane is abundant and is of significant concern as a greenhouse gas both in itself and if combusted (as carbon dioxide is a reaction product). Using a plasma torch to decompose methane into carbon and hydrogen removes greenhouse gases from the system—hydrogen can be used without resulting harmful reaction products, and the carbon can be used for environmentally positive purposes. Providing methane in the built environment is relatively straightforward, requiring less infrastructural adaptation than provision of hydrogen.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying Figures, of which:
General and specific embodiments of the invention will be described below with reference to the Figures.
The approach shown in
The hydrocarbon provided through the hydrocarbon input 23 may be methane—as methane is a polluting gas, conversion of methane to carbon and hydrogen has a clear environmental benefit, as hydrogen burns without a polluting by-product. The reactor stage 21 may comprise a plasma torch reactor used to decompose methane, and the separator stage 22 may comprise a liquid metal system to carry reaction products away from the plasma torch and to provide them to separate outputs. As is further discussed below, a more complex reactor arrangement is possible—for example, the liquid metal stage may have both a reactor and a separation function.
A particularly suitable embodiment of a hydrogen production system will now be described—this approach uses a plasma torch to separate methane into hydrogen and carbon, and a liquid metal system to remove the hydrogen and carbon for separation into a hydrogen gas output and a solid carbon output. A reactor using this approach will now be described. The reactor is formed as a pressure vessel with electrical inputs to power a plasma torch or torches (further detail is provided in
In the multi-stage reactor approach, gaseous inputs—for example, hydrocarbons such as methane, and potentially additional hydrogen for cooling (though this may be recirculated from the output products)—are admitted into the plasma torch, and the plasma torch consumes the input feedstock gases providing a first set of output products, such as carbon and hydrogen. These first output products pass at high temperature as inputs into a liquid metal reactor, which then provides pyrolysis of further feedstock gas. Final output products—such as carbon, extracted through the liquid metal, and hydrogen, output as a gas—are provided from liquid metal reactor after a separation process—these final output products include the first output products from the plasma torch along with further output products produced from pyrolysis in the liquid metal reactor. The pyrolysis reaction is endothermic, but there is still sufficient heat present that the gaseous final output products are at significantly greater temperature than desired for storage, so there is excess heat to be used. Here, this heated gas output is used by a heat exchanger which controls the temperature of feedstock gases for different stages of the reactor process. As will be noted further below, this multi-stage reactor is only an exemplary hydrogen production system—embodiments of the invention may not require all the features described for the multi-stage reactor.
The plasma torch is shown in more detail in
Further strategies are used to prevent carbon build-up. The shaping of the anode can also be arranged such that a likely deposition point for carbon would be on the anode in the region of the spark gap with the torch in operation—spark action can then further erode any carbon build-up.
Another feature that prevents carbon build up is shown in
This arrangement allows for operation at high temperature (above 6000 degrees Centigrade at the point of reaction) and hyperbaric pressure in the torch, with a very high throughput of gaseous feedstock. For an input of 200 kW of power into the plasma torch, and with operating temperatures within the torch chamber in the region of 6000 degrees Centigrade at the point of reaction and pressures of 50 bar, approximately 72 kg/hour of methane can be processed using this design. The voltage across the electrodes will typically be between 150V and 600V, typically about 250V, with operating current between 100A and 500A, typically about 200A. Feedstock gases can be pre-heated by using a heat exchanger—taking advantage of the heat given out in the pyrolysis reaction (see further discussion below), though hydrogen used to cool the anode will be provided at a lower temperature.
Before describing the other elements of the reactor, an overall reaction flow for the multi-stage reactor will be described with respect to
Two inputs to the system are shown: electricity 1101 and hydrocarbon 1102 (in this case, methane). Two outputs are shown: hydrogen 1103 (though for other reactions, other output gases may be provided as well or instead—note also that some of the hydrogen generated is recirculated for use in the reaction processes) and carbon black 1104. These outputs are put to different uses, as will be indicated further below with reference to
The plasma torch 1105 itself acts as a second reactor 1122, providing high temperature hydrogen and (primarily) gasified carbon as outputs 1114. The plasma torch 1105 through its reaction products operates on the next reactor stage, which is a liquid metal pyrolysis reactor 1123. The plasma torch 1105 provides heat for this reaction, heating up the metal (here, lead) to reaction temperature, and also providing rotation to the lead, allowing the carbon to be extracted at the centre of the reactor. More high temperature hydrocarbon 1115 is provided from the heat exchanger 1121 as a feedstock for the liquid metal pyrolysis reactor 1123. The hydrogen output 1116, provided at very high temperature (approximately 1200 degrees Centigrade) from the exothermic reaction in the pyrolysis reactor, is returned to the heat exchanger 1121 and partly recirculated to the plasma torch 1105 while mainly provided (at a lower temperature) at the hydrogen gas output 1104.
The liquid metal pyrolysis reactor is shown in more detail in
The liquid (molten) metal is delivered into the swirl chamber 125 so as to give rotation to the liquid metal column, allowing the liquid metal both to initiate a pyrolysis reaction in the input gas and to act as a centrifugal separator, separating reaction products towards the centre of the rotating column. Carbon is then extractable from the base of the reactor in a carbon output 126. Hydrogen rises from the liquid metal and is released through a hydrogen output 127 from the top of the reactor. The reaction is carried out at elevated temperature and pressure (typically 800-1000 degrees Centigrade and 50 bar).
This functionality may be usefully combined with that of the plasma torch even if the liquid metal system is not itself a reactor—in that case, it only acts as a separator to separate the reaction products from the plasma torch, powered by the energy of the plasma torch output. This leaves significant excess heat, however, and it is found that making the liquid metal system itself a reactor, used for endothermic pyrolysis of further hydrocarbon, leads to a particularly effective reactor system.
The plasma torch is designed so that it will jet effectively into the liquid metal racetrack 122—in particular, the diffuser of the plasma torch is designed to match pressures with the outside of the torch. This will have the benefit of supporting linear rather than turbulent flow in the liquid metal racetrack. The liquid metal may be brought into a swirl or vortex which will act to stabilize the plasma jet. Reaction products from the plasma torch—in the example shown, hydrogen and carbon—will be carried in the liquid metal for subsequent separation in and output from the liquid metal reactor, as described below.
The liquid metal system may also serve to purge the outputs of the plasma torch reactor from impurities. For example, ethylene may be produced as a by-product but then be broken down again in the liquid metal system. The liquid metal from the liquid metal system may have other functions. For example, the diffuser of the plasma torch may extend sufficiently far into the liquid metal racetrack that the liquid metal will act to clean the diffuser and prevent carbon build-up there—in embodiments, the diffuser section may be porous in part to support liquid metal flow. If desired, the liquid metal from the racetrack could even be driven up to flood the plasma torches, rapidly quenching the reaction and stopping their operation. Liquid metal could thus be used to flood—and hence clean—the porous anode (and where used, cathode) structures.
Lead, or a mixture primarily containing lead, may be used as the liquid metal in the liquid metal system. Lead is a suitable choice as it is liquid at reaction temperatures without having a high vapour pressure, and it creates fewer toxicity issues than most other suitable metals. Gallium is another possible choice.
As noted above, the liquid metal system is here designed in this structure to act not only as a separator but also as a reactor.
Further details of the swirl chamber 125 are shown in
As has been described above, a heat exchanger system is provided which allows the heat generated in reaction to be used to provide input gases at the correct temperature for use in the reaction. The hydrogen output from the liquid metal reactor, which is at high temperature (1200 degrees Centigrade) is used to heat up methane feedstock for provision to both the plasma torch and to the liquid metal pyrolysis reactor. A part of this hydrogen output is cooled to a much lower temperature (for example 200 to 400 degrees Centigrade) and used to cool the anode and the cathode of the plasma torch, as described above.
While the reactor embodiment described here is adapted for pyrolysis of methane, this reactor structure can be employed for a number of reactions. As noted in the discussion of the feedstock system, for example, a variety of input gases may be used in different reactions, with input positions of gases chosen to achieve the correct circulation of gases throughout the plasma torch. Similarly, different inputs may be provided to the liquid metal reactor, rather than simply methane, to achieve different reactions.
It should be emphasised that the specific reactor structure described above is exemplary only of a hydrogen production system for use in embodiments of the invention. In particular, a multistage or composite reactor structure is not required—what is needed is an effective way to produce hydrogen and appropriately formed carbon at an appropriate scale, which can be achieved by use of a plasma torch for separation of hydrocarbon into hydrogen and carbon together with a liquid metal system to achieve effective separation.
The size of hydrogen production system will need to be appropriate to the built environment in which it is located—a system adapted to provide a 3 kW power output (through the hydrogen consumers) would be appropriate to meet the needs of a normal household (with energy demand of about 1 KW)—larger outputs would be needed for larger buildings or sets of buildings. Hydrogen production systems of the kind indicated above are highly scalable, so it will be possible to design a system appropriate to the requirements of the building in which it is located.
Hydrogen and hydrogen-ready boilers are currently undergoing full commercial development, with boilers at the prototype stage at least developed by Worcester Bosch, Viessman and Baxi, with some prototype boilers able to operate on a full hydrogen supply and others on a natural gas and hydrogen mix. A solid oxide fuel cell may be appropriate for use as a hydrogen consumer in this system—the skilled person will be aware of what fuel cell will be appropriate for use here for a hydrogen supply of the type indicated. The fuel cell may be run to provide electricity for the building or buildings, or for provision of electricity to the electrical grid. This can be used as a balancing mechanism, both locally and more widely to compensate for variability of a renewable-dominated set of sources for power supply to the electricity grid—hydrogen can be consumed by the boiler when electricity prices are low, but it can be consumed by the fuel cell to provide power to the grid when electricity prices are high.
For a 3 kW system of the type described, the carbon output will be of the order of 500 g per hour. The size of carbon output can be controlled to some degree by adjusting parameters of the process used to create it, but sizes will typically be of the order of 0.05-0.5 microns.
This is of comparable size to powdered activated carbon, which is already used to treat groundwater contamination. Contaminants such as nitrites, nitrates and phosphates are loosely bound to the carbon, which has a very high contact area enabling significant adsorption of such materials. The dwell time of the carbon in sewage systems is likely to be of the order of hours, providing good opportunity to adsorb material. The fine nature of the material means however that it is unlikely to block sewage systems, even downstream systems that are not specifically designed to receive materials of this type. The carbon acts as a filter effective to reduce the level of contaminants in groundwater—this may, for example, be necessary to enable developers of new properties to meet environmental impact requirements for a relevant development.
As the skilled person will appreciate, the approach taken here does not rely on the use of a specific type of hydrogen production system, provided that hydrogen and carbon are provided as outputs. The skilled person will also appreciate that variations can be made to this approach without digressing from the fundamental concept described here—for example, an alternative output gas to hydrogen could be produced by a modified “hydrogen production system” to power the heating system.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2112954.9 | Sep 2021 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2022/052218 | 8/30/2022 | WO |