1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to a process for hydrogenation of a middle distillate feedstock such as diesel fuel to produce improved quality diesel product.
2. Background of the Art
Petroleum distillates including gas oils boiling in the range of from about 330° F. to about 800° F., including straight run gas oils, visbreaker thermally cracked gas oil, coker gas oil, and FCC light cycle gas oil, are treated to produce improved quality diesel fuels. The diesel fuel must meet certain specifications relative to sulfur, nitrogen, olefins and aromatics content, cetane index, boiling point (distillation) and gravity. More stringent regulations will require refiners to produce ultra low sulfur content diesel (ULSD) in the coming years. Generally, this will force refiners to produce 10-50 wppm or lower sulfur content diesel fuel.
Desulfurization of hydrocarbon feedstocks by hydrotreating is known, i.e., by reacting the feedstock with hydrogen under appropriate conditions to remove the sulfur in the form of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). With recent catalyst advancements, refiners can reduce the sulfur in the treated distillate product in the existing unit, but not enough to meet the pending regulations.
Many existing hydrotreaters which are currently producing diesel fuel with sulfur levels greater than 50 wppm will require revamping and/or implementation of new units. To achieve the required diesel fuel specifications, it is necessary to treat the distillate feedstock in order to affect the chemical and physical properties of the distillates. The catalyst type and operating severity are a function of the desired diesel fuel specifications. The processing requires hydrogenation with an appropriate catalyst or a combination of different catalyst systems over a hydrogen rich environment. For sulfur, nitrogen, olefins and aromatics reduction, deep hydrogenation is required. For cetane and/or gravity improvement, both deep hydrogenation and selective ring opening is required.
Prior practice conventional processing schemes to revamp existing hydrotreaters to produce ultra low sulfur diesel will typically add a new co-current reactor in series or parallel with the existing reactor to implement additional catalyst volume. In addition, this type of revamp scheme poses significant modifications and/or replacement of existing equipment items in the high pressure reaction loop including, major piping/heat exchanger, amine scrubber, and recycle compressor. All of these existing unit modifications will result in major capital investment and down time.
A process is provided herein for the hydrogenation of a hydrocarbon feed. The process comprises contacting a major portion of the hydrocarbon feed with hydrogen in a counter-current manner in a first reaction zone under hydrogenation reaction conditions in the presence of a hydrogenation catalyst in at least a first catalyst bed wherein a liquid effluent exits at a bottom end of the first reaction zone and a hydrogen-containing gaseous effluent exits at a top end of the first reaction zone; and contacting a minor portion of the hydrocarbon feed with said hydrogen-containing gaseous effluent in a co-current manner in a second reaction zone having a catalyst bed positioned to receive said hydrogen-containing effluent of the first reaction zone.
In another embodiment the process comprises (a) co-current contacting of the petroleum fraction with hydrogen in a first reaction zone in the presence of a first hydrogenation catalyst to produce a first effluent having a reduced heteroatom content; and, (b) contacting the first effluent with hydrogen in a counter-current manner in a second reaction zone in the presence of a second hydrogenation catalyst to produce a product having a heteroatom content of no more than about 50 ppm by weight.
The process entails deep hydrogenation and achieves ultra low sulfur content diesel fuel for both new and existing facilities without major modifications typically associated with conventional processing schemes.
Various embodiments are described herein with reference to the drawings wherein:
The present invention can be used for hydrogenation of a petroleum fraction, particularly a middle distillate such as that to be used for diesel fuel. Hydrogenation can be employed for hydrotreatment, for example, to remove heteroatoms or for dearomatization (e.g., hydrodesulfurization, hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodearomatization).
The processing scheme of the present invention employs a counter-current reactor which can be integrated into an existing hydrotreatment system. The counter-current reactor is implemented “outside the high pressure reaction loop” thus offering additional processing advantages, including lower installed cost, simpler revamp, no major piping/heat integration, no impact to the existing scrubber or the recycle gas compressor and reduced down time. The alternate scheme utilizes low cost base metal catalyst and offers improved product properties including aromatics reduction, cetane improvement and catalyst stability.
For revamps, the existing reactor operation is optimized so as to prepare feed to the new counter-current reactor. The counter-current reactor further treats the effluent from the existing reactor to achieve the required processing objectives.
Referring now to
Feed F is a middle range petroleum fraction typically having the following properties as shown in Table 1:
These ranges are given for the purpose of illustration. Feeds having properties outside of these ranges can also be used when appropriate.
Hydrogen is added to the feed F via line 127, and the mixed feed plus hydrogen is sent to co-current reactor R-1 wherein at least partial hydrodesulfurization is accomplished. Co-current reactor includes a bed containing a suitable hydrodesulfurization catalyst such as nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), and combinations thereof (such as Ni—Mo, Co—Mo, Ni—W, Co—Mo—Ni, Co—Mo—W), on a support such as silica, alumina, or silica-alumina. Co-current hydrodesulfurization reaction conditions typically include a temperature of from about 200° C. to about 450° C., a pressure of from about 300 psig to about 1,500 psig, and a space velocity of up to about 20 v/v/hr. The effluent 110 from reactor R-1 typically has a sulfur content of from about 100 ppm to about 1,000 ppm by weight. The at least partially desulfurized effluent (line 110) is cooled by heat exchanger 111 to a temperature of from about 200° C. to about 380° C. and sent to drum D-11 via line 110 where it is separated into a vapor and a liquid. The liquid is drawn off via line 112 and heated in heat exchanger 113 to a temperature of from about 225° C. to about 370° C. and then sent to countercurrent reactor R-2. The vapor from drum D-11 is further cooled by heat exchanger 115 and sent via line 114 to drum D-12 for further separation of vapor and liquid components. The vapor, containing hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, and light hydrocarbon components, is added via line 120 to line 118 for transfer to drum D-13. The liquid is drawn off and sent via line 122 to stream 112 to be sent to reactor R-2.
Counter-current reactor R-2 preferably includes two or more beds of catalyst, B-1 and B-2. Reactor R-2 includes two reaction zones: a first zone in which counter-current contacting of hydrocarbon and hydrogen takes place, and a second reaction zone wherein co-current contacting of hydrocarbon and hydrogen takes place. As shown in
A major portion of the hydrocarbon feed to the reactor flows downward into the first reaction zone occupied by bed B-1. The hydrogen entering at the bottom of reactor R-2 travels upward in a counter-current manner against the downflow of liquid through the catalyst bed B-1. However, the hydrogen-containing gas exiting as an effluent from bed B-1 at the top of the first reaction zone entrains a minor portion of the hydrocarbon feed to the reactor. Any entrained hydrocarbon mist or vapor is reacted with the hydrogen-containing gas in the presence of the catalyst in bed B-2. Since both the hydrocarbon portion and the hydrogen-containing gas flow upward through bed B-1, the contacting is conducted in a co-current manner. The positioning of a catalyst bed B-2 above the feed inlet so as to receive the effluent hydrogen-containing gas from the first reaction zone insures that no hydrocarbon passes through reactor R-2 without contacting hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst, thereby achieving the requirements of ultra low sulfur content. The overhead 116 from reactor R-2 is combined with the bottom liquid, and the total effluent of reactor R-2 is cooled in heat exchanger 117 and sent via line 118 to drum D-13.
Liquid product P is separated and drawn off from drum D-13 via line 126, and the vapor is removed via line 124. The process and equipment described herein will provide a product P, useful as a diesel fuel component, having have a sulfur content of below 50 ppm by weight.
The vapor overhead from drum D-13 (containing hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide and some hydrocarbon components) is drawn off via line 124 and sent through heat exchanger 125 for cooling and then through air cooling unit 130 and into drum D-14 for further separation of liquid and vapor. The liquid from drum D-14 is drawn off the bottom through line 134 and added to stream 126 to form the product stream P of ultra low sulfur content petroleum fraction. The vapor from drum D-14 (containing hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, and some light hydrocarbons such as methane ethane, etc.) is sent via line 132 to the bottom the absorber A wherein the upflow of vapor is contacted in a counter-current fashion with a downflowing absorbent to remove the hydrogen sulfide from the vapor stream. More particularly, a lean amine absorbent A-1 is introduced at the top of absorber 150. The amine absorbent is preferably, for example, an aqueous solution of an alkanolamine such as ethanolamine, diethanolamine, diisopropanolamine, methyldiethanolamine, triethanolamine, and the like.
The overhead hydrogen rich vapor (including some light hydrocarbon components) from the absorber A is sent via line 136 to a compressor C-1 where it is compressed to a pressure of from about 400 psig to about 1,600 psig. The stream 128 exiting the compressor C-1 can be divided into stream 129 which is mixed with make-up hydrogen stream H for transfer to reactor R-2, and stream 127 which is sent through unit 125 for heat exchange with stream 124 to feed stream F.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The vapor stream 313 from drum D-31 is cooled by heat exchange in heat exchanger 325 and further cooled by air cooler 330 before being sent to drum D-34 for separation of vapor and liquid. The liquid bottom stream 344 from drum D-34 is combined with liquid stream 328 from drum D-32 to form a product stream P of ultra low sulfur content petroleum fraction. The overhead vapor stream from drum D-34 is combined with vapor stream 326 from drum D-33 and sent via line 334 to absorber A wherein it is counter-current contacted with a stream of downflowing amine H2S absorbent such as described above. The overhead H2S-free vapor stream 336 containing mostly hydrogen with some light hydrocarbons is sent to compressor C-1 for compression to about 400 psig to about 1,600 psig. The compressor output stream 338 can be divided into stream 340, which is added to make-up hydrogen stream H, and stream 342, which is heat exchanged against stream 313 in exchanger 325 and then added to feed stream F for introduction into reactor R-1.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The Example below illustrates aspects of the invention.
A feedstock was provided having the following range of properties:
The feedstock was treated in a hydrogenation system having a counter-current reactor in accordance with the invention. The reaction conditions included a temperature of 346° C., a pressure of 750 psig, a space velocity of 1.6 LHSV, and a hydrogenation catalyst comprising NiMo on a silica support. The resulting product had an API Gravity of 38.6, a sulfur content of 8 ppm by weight, and a nitrogen content of less than 1 ppm by weight.
While the above description contains many specifics, these specifics should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but merely as exemplifications of preferred embodiments thereof. For example, the first and second reaction zones can be situated in different reactor shells as well as a single reactor shell. Those skilled in the art will envision many other possible variations that are within the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3761399 | Kinney et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3767562 | Sze et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3846278 | Sze et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
4021330 | Satchell, Jr. | May 1977 | A |
4530753 | Shiroto et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4530754 | Shiroto et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4576709 | Miller et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
5183556 | Reilly et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5522983 | Cash et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5643442 | Sweet et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5730860 | Irvine | Mar 1998 | A |
5942197 | Gupta et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6153086 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6241876 | Tsao et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6312586 | Klanes et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6402940 | Rappas | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406616 | Rappas et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6444116 | Galiasso et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444118 | Podrebarac et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6495029 | Schorfheide et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6623621 | Iaccino et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623622 | Gupta | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623628 | Bronner et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
20010001450 | Markley et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20020050466 | Shih et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0034416 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040238409 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |