Hydroxymethyl polyols

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application discloses material which is also disclosed in co-pending application Ser. No. 415,734, filed concurrently with this application by the same inventors now U.S. Pat. No. 4,423,162.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention describes polyols which are useful, among other purposes, in the manufacture of urethane polymers.
2. Description of the Art Practices
It is known that polyols may be formulated from many materials. For instance the work of Hostettler, and Hostettler et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 2,933,477 issued Apr. 19, 1960; U.S. Pat. No. 2,962,524 issued Nov. 29, 1960; and U.S. Pat. No. 2,962,455 issued Nov. 29, 1960, teaches that caprolactone may be utilized to form polyols which are then useful in the formation of other materials such as urethanes. However, the Hostettler, and Hostettler et al materials are solids and thus are of limited utility because they must be heated above their melting point in order to be capable of reacting effectively with other materials.
It is known from U.S. Pat. No. 2,599,468 issued June 3, 1952 to McKeever that 9(10)hydroxymethyloctadecanol may be prepared. This material is normally a solid although it is sometimes found as a super cooled liquid. While this material might be useful for several purposes it is expensive to obtain in that the normal route of processing is from oleic acid. That is, while the hydroxymethyl formation through the oxo process may be conducted relatively simply on this material, there is difficulty and expense involved in converting the carboxylic group to an alcohol. DeWitt et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,242,414 issued Mar. 29, 1966 discloses that electrically resistant materials may be formed from the alcohols described in the aforementioned McKeever patent. It is known that acrylic esters of the materials of McKeever may be formulated through the disclosures of Offenlegungsschrift No. 2,200,021 published July 26, 1973 by Wegemund. It is also known from U.S. Pat. No. 3,043,871 to Buchner et al. issued July 10, 1962 that the diacid corresponding to the alcohol of McKeever may be formed.
The work of the United States Department of Agriculture at the Northern Regional Laboratory at Peoria, Ill., has lead to the conversion number of unsaturated fatty compounds which may be further converted to useful materials. For instance, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,787,459 issued Jan. 22, 1974 to Frankel there is disclosed formyl derivatives of carboxylic acids. In U.S. Pat. No. 3,928,231 issued Dec. 23, 1975 to Frankel there is also disclosed the formation of polycarboxylic acids derived from fatty materials. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,093,637 issued June 6, 1978 to Miller the use of esters of fatty derived materials as polyvinylchloride plasticizers is disclosed. Esters of materials containing hydroxyl groups are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,083,816 issued Apr. 11, 1978 to Frankel et al.
There are further disclosures of materials by the United States Department of Agriculture in a paper entitled Carboxystearic Acid Esterification and Interchanges dated Nov. 11, 1971 by Dufek et al. A second publication of Dufek et al entitled Some Esters of Mono- Di- and Tricarboxystearic Acid as Plasticizers; Preparation and Evaluation, Volume 53 JAOCS, p. 198, May 1976 discusses the uses of polycarboxylate esters. The formation of a hydroxymethyl triglyceride product of hydroformylation and hydrogenation of oleic safflower oil is referred to by Frankel et al in JAOCS Vol. 48, No. 5, p. 248 entitled Methyl 9(10)-Formylstearate by Selective Hydroformylation of Oleic Oils. Hydroxymethyl fatty alcohols are also described in the work of Frankel et al in JAOCS Vol. 52, 12, p. 498, 1975, entitled Acyl Esters of Oxo-Derived Hydroxymethylstearates as Plasticizers for Polyvinyl Chloride.
It is also known from German Pat. No. 934889 published Nov. 10, 1955 that certain tricyclic esters may be formed. Similar work in this regard is found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 194,172 by Rogier filed Oct. 6, 1980. Similar disclosures of polycyclic alcohols are found in Offenlegungsschrift No. 2,200,022 laid open for inspection July 19, 1973. Further disclosures of such materials are found in derivatives of Dicyclopentadiene-Valuable Key Compounds, Cornils et al published in Chemiker Zeitung 98, (2), 70-76, 1974.
The disclosures of the foregoing references, to the extent that they are applicable to the present invention, are hereby incorporated by reference.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The subject invention is directed to non-gelled polyols of the general formula:
RXAH].sub.p
where
R is a polyol, polyamine or aminoalcohol residue;
X is O, N, or NH;
p is an integer from 2 to 6; and,
A, which may be the same or different, is selected from the group consisting of A.sub.1, A.sub.2, and A.sub.3 and combinations of A.sub.1, A.sub.2 and A.sub.3,
where ##STR1## where m, n, q, r, s, .alpha., .beta. and .gamma. are integers such that m is greater than 3, n is greater than or equal to zero, and the sum of m and n is from 11 to 19, inclusive; q is greater than 3, r and s are each greater than or equal to zero and the sum of q, r and s is from 10 to 18, inclusive; .alpha., .beta. and .gamma. are each from 0 to 10, inclusive, all .alpha.'s, .beta.'s and .gamma.'s are not zero.
The compounds of the invention do not include the hydroxymethyl triglyceride product referred to by Frankel in the article appearing in JAOCS, No. 48, No. 5, pp 248-253, at 249 (1971) entitled Methyl 9(10)--Formylstearate by Selective Hydroformylation of Oleic Oils. This product is referred to by Frankel as hydroxymethyl triglyceride product produced by hydrogenation of hydroformylated oleic safflower oil (90.5% formylstearate). Accordingly, the subject application is not intended to encompass compounds in which in the above formula R is the residue of glycerol, X is oxygen, p is 3, A is A.sub.1 and each .alpha. in A.sub.1 is 1. As the pertinent teachings of Frankel are limited to reactions conducted on oils of fatty acids to yield triglyceride products, they have no bearing on the polyol compounds of the invention. This fact will become more evident when the preparation of the compounds of the invention are described hereinafter.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The subject invention is directed to novel polyols of controlled structure such that cross-linking, often referred to as gelling, does not occur. The resulting products are useful in the manufacture of urethanes.
In preparing the compounds of the invention, a reaction of an A-B type hydroxy ester monomer such as methyl 9(10)-hydroxymethyloctadecanoate and a multifunctional compound having at least two active hydrogens of the type R(OH).sub.p, i.e., a polyol or R(NH.sub.2).sub.p or R(NH).sub.p, i.e., a polyamine is employed, R representing the residual proportion of the compound and p is as defined previously. The active hydrogens can also be present in compounds having both hydroxyl and amine groups, e.g., aminoalcohols.
The reaction can be represented by the following equation, using a polyol as the source of active hydrogens:
j(A-B)+R(OH)HD p.fwdarw.R[O(B-A).sub.j --H].sub.p
If A-B represents a hydroxyester, HO--R"--CO.sub.2 R"', then the reaction becomes ##STR2## The resulting multichain polyester polyols are composed of p chains and thus have a hydroxyl functionality of p which corresponds exactly with the functionality of the starting polyol R(OH).sub.p. Cross-linking is precluded since the terminal hydroxyl groups do not react with themselves under the reaction conditions. The average length j of the chains is controlled by the relative proportion of the hydroxy ester monomer to the multifunctional reactant and the extent of the condensation, which is generally carried to completion.
The reaction mechanism is the same when polyamines or aminoalcohols are employed as the sources of active hydrogens. Polyamines containing primary and secondary amines as well as combinations of primary and secondary amines function effectively to produce amide polyols.
The hydroxy ester monomer starting material is prepared by hydrogenation of hydroformylated unsaturated carboxylic acids or esters. The starting unsaturated acids are obtained most conveniently by splitting a triglyceride into its respective component fatty acids. Such sources of fatty acids which are unsaturated include tallow and most plant sources particularly soybean, sesame, sunflower, tall oil and other similar materials. For the purposes of processing, the starting fatty acids are conveniently obtained in the form of the methyl ester.
The introduction of the hydroxymethyl group can be readily accomplished by a hydroformylation process utilizing either cobalt or rhodium catalysts, followed by hydrogenation of the formyl group to obtain the hydroxymethyl group by catalytic methods or by chemical reduction. This procedure is described in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,216,343, 4,216,344, 4,304,945, and 4,229,562 of Rogier and references discussed therein and, to the extent necessary to the understanding of the subject invention, each of these patents and references is hereby incorporated by reference.
When a mono-unsaturated fatty acid ester is used as the starting material, a mono-hydroxymethyl ester of the following formula is obtained (using the methyl ester as an example): ##STR3## For most of the commonly available mono-unsaturated fatty acids, m>3 and n is a value such that the sum of m and n is between 11 and 19. Thus, for example, the product obtained when the methyl ester of oleic acid is the starting material is 9(10) methyl hydroxymethyloctadecanoate of the formula: ##STR4## where m is 8 or 7, and
n is 7 or 8.
The designation 9(10) in the name of this compound and the alternative designations for m and n in the formula indicate that the product is, in fact, a mixture of the 9 and 10 isomers with respect to the hydroxymethyl group, as a result of the alternative positioning of the formyl group in the hydroformylation process.
When a di-unsaturated fatty acid ester is selected as the starting material, a di-hydroxymethyl ester of the following formula is obtained via the rhodium catalyzed hydroformylation process (again using the methyl ester as an example): ##STR5## For most commonly available di-unsaturated fatty acids, q will be >3, r and s will be zero or greater, and the sum of q, r and s will be between 10 and 18, inclusive.
Thus, for example, if 9,12-linoleic acid ester is the starting material, the formylated ester will be a 9(10), 12(13) diformyloctadecanoate, that is, a mixture of the 9-12, 9-13, 10-12, 10-13 diformyl esters. When this mixture is hydrogenated the corresponding di-hydroxymethyloctadecanoates will be obtained.
A tri-unsaturated starting material will partially reduce giving a mixture of isomers. Without discussing all the particular isomers present when 9,12,15-linolenic acid ester is employed, the product will be a diformyl mixture of the 9(10), 12(13), and 15(16) isomers.
The hydroxymethyl monomer can also be prepared as a gem-bis(hydroxymethyl)ester of the formula (again using the methyl ester as an example): ##STR6## where m and n are as previously defined.
The preparation of these gem-bis(hydroxymethyl) compounds follows the procedure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,307,224 to Rogier, except that unsaturated esters as opposed to the unsaturated alcohol analogs are used as the starting material. Accordingly, to the extent necessary for the understanding of the subject invention, the disclosure of the foregoing patent is hereby incorporated by reference.
The multifunctional compounds containing at least two active hydrogens which are reacted with the hydroxymethyl compounds to obtain the polyols of the invention, may be generically identified by the formula:
R(XH).sub.p
where
X is O, N, or NH, and
p is 2 to 6.
In this formula, X may be the same in each moiety p or may differ in one or more moieties. The formula, therefore, encompasses polyols, polyamines containing primary and secondary amines and combinations of primary and secondary amines and aminoalcohols, i.e., compounds containing both hydroxy and amino groups. The component R then represents the residual portion of the compound. In this regard, it should be understood that when X represents N, so that the compound contains a secondary amino group, R represents both portions of the residual compound attached to the secondary amino group.
Polyols useful as the multifunctional compound include diols, triols, tetrols and even higher polyols. The choice of the polyol will depend upon the functionality desired in the product polyol of the invention.
Exemplary of useful diols include such materials as ethylene glycol, neopentylglycol, diols of the formula:
H(CH.sub.2).sub.h CH(CH.sub.2 OH)(CH.sub.2).sub.k CH.sub.2 OH
where
k is >3; and
h+k are non-zero integers, the sum of which is from 12 through 20.
An example of such material is 9(10)-hydroxymethyloctadecanol. Additional diol materials which may be used in the present invention include 1,4-bishydroxymethylcyclohexane. Further diol materials include a compound of the formula: ##STR7## wherein R.sub.1, R.sub.2, R.sub.3 and R.sub.4 have a total of from 30 to 38 carbon atoms and are each straight-chained alkyl groups having at least 5 carbon atoms, and wherein two of these alkyl groups have omega-hydroxyl substituents. Such later described materials are described in British Pat. No. 1,043,507.
Further useful diols which may be utilized in the present invention include compounds of the formula: ##STR8## and mixtures thereof.
Specific compounds within the scope of the foregoing formulas are 8,8-bis(hydroxymethyl)-tricyclo [5,2,1,0.sup.2,6 ]decane and 8,8(9,9)-bis(hydroxymethyl)-tricyclo [5,2,1,0.sup.2,6 ]decene.
Still further diol materials which may be used in the present invention include 2,5-hexanediol; 1,6-hexanediol; Dimerol alcohol, a 36 carbon diol available from the Henkel Corporation; 1,4-cyclohexane diol; Polybd R-45HT, a butadiene diol having an approximate molecular weight of 2800; hydrogenated bisphenol A, and other similar materials. An additional diol which may be employed is the diol which is a member selected from the group consisting of 3(4),8(9) -(bishydroxymethyl)-tricyclo[5,2,1,0.sup.2,6 ]decane.
Suitable triol materials include trimethylol propane and the triols disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,216,344 to Rogier. However, in some instances the presence of secondary hydroxyl groups can cause problems in the properties of the molecules such as sweating wherein the product appears to be wet and not fully cured. Therefore, as a practical matter, triols should contain no secondary hydroxyl groups and/or should preferably contain more than 3 carbon atoms so that any secondary hydroxyl group is not hindered by the close positioning of the primary hydroxyl groups within the molecule.
Further triols useful in the present invention include the triols described by Rogier in U.S. Pat. No. 4,216,344. A suitable example of such materials includes 9,9(10,10)-bishydroxymethyloctadecanol.
It is further noted that it is possible to use triols in combinations with other polyols, a particularly valuable blend being that found described by Rogier in U.S. Pat. No. 4,243,818. Additional examples of triols which may be employed include 1,2,6-hexanetriol and other similar materials.
Tetrols include such materials as pentaerythritol. Higher polyols include those pentols described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,216,344 issued to Rogier.
Further polyols which are useful include materials from the work of Rogier in U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 233,793, filed Feb. 12, 1981. Such compounds are shown below: ##STR9## and mixtures thereof wherein R.sub.1 and R.sub.2 are selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and methyl and mixtures thereof with the provision that one such member must be hydrogen; and R.sub.3 and R.sub.4 are hydrogen or hydroxymethyl provided that at least one of R.sub.3 and R.sub.4 must be hydroxymethyl, and further that x is an integer of from 3 through 6 and y is an integer from 6 through 9 and that the sum x+y is 12.
Polyols for use in preparing the compounds of the invention also include ester linked polyols and ether linked polyols such as tetramethylene glycol ethers. Similarly, diethylene glycol may be employed. It is also possible to use compounds containing both ester and ether linkages within the molecule, provided that at least two hydroxyl radicals remain. A preferred group of polyols within this class of linked polyols are those prepared by condensing a polyol with at least one mole of alkylene oxide per mole of hydroxyl on the polyol, according to the reaction (using ethylene oxide for illustration): ##STR10## While ethylene oxide is the preferred alkoxylating agent for preparing ether polyols, other alkylene oxides, notably propylene oxide, may be used as well as mixtures of alkylene oxides, most notably mixtures of ethylene and propylene oxides.
Polyamine compounds which are useful in preparing amide polyols according to the invention may contain primary and secondary amine groups and combinations thereof provided that there are at least two amino groups. They may be linear or branched chain, cyclic or aromatic in structure. Such compounds include, but are not limited to, diamines such as ethylene diamine, neopentyldiamine, 1,6-diaminohexane, bis-aminomethyltricyclodecane, bis-aminocyclohexane; triamines such as diethylene triamine; and tetramines such as triethylene tetramine.
Exemplary aminoalcohols which are useful in preparing polyols according to the invention are ethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine.
As discussed previously, the polyol compounds of the invention are prepared by a transesterification reaction. The starting materials comprising the hydroxymethyl ester monomer and the multifunctional compound, i.e., polyol, polyamine or aminoalcohol, are mixed together in proportions which are selected to achieve the desired product. Mixtures of different multifunctional reactants as well as mixtures of different hydroxymethyl ester monomers may be used as the starting materials for the reaction. Mixed hydroxymethyl esters generally occur when the starting material is derived from naturally occurring fatty oils.
The temperature of the reaction mixture is gradually raised until an alkanol is generated. The particular alkanol produced will depend upon the alkyl moiety of the ester group. Thus, when the hydroxymethyl ester reactant is a methyl ester, methanol is generated. The alkanol is preferably drawn off from the reaction mixture to encourage a substantially complete reaction. Ideally, no more than a minor amount of the starting hydroxymethyl ester should remain in the end product as this material is mono-functional in reactions with polyisocyanates, and therefore acts as a chain terminating agent. The product polyols of the invention are referred to as hydroxymethyl polyols since each hydroxyl group in the polyol exists as part of a hydroxymethyl moiety.
The optimum reaction temperature will vary depending upon the catalyst selected for the reaction, if any, and the reactivity of the reactants. Generally, reactions employing polyols as the multifunctional reactant are enhanced by the use of catalysts such as dibutyl tin oxide, butyltin tris(2-ethylhexoate), butylchlorotin dihydroxide, tetrabutyl orthotitanate, calcium acetate/antimony oxide and base catalysts such as sodium methoxide. Reactions involving polyamines as the multifunctional reactant do not generally require catalysts.
In the preparation of the products of this invention, it is important to avoid gellation, i.e., formation products of infinitely high viscosity and insolubility in all nondegrading solvents. Gellation can be avoided by limiting the extent of conversion or generally more preferably by using quantities of reactants far from the amounts required stoichiometrically. For a discussion of gellation see Flory, "Principles of Polymer Chemistry", Cornell University Press, 1953, p. 47, 347.
As previously noted, the polyols of the invention are particularly useful in the manufacture of urethanes through reaction with polyisocyanates. Suitable polyisocyanates include ethylene diisocyanate, trimethylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, propylene-1, 2-diisocyanate, ethylidene diisocyanate, cyclopentylene-1, 3-diisocyanate, the 1,2-, 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexylene diisocyanates, the 1,3- and 1,4-phenylene diisocyanates, diphenylmethane diisocyanates, polymethyleneisocyanates, the 2,4- and 2,6-toluene diisocyanates, the 1,3- and 1,4-xylylene diisocyanates, bis(4-isocyanatoethyl) carbonate, 1,8-diisocyanato-p-methane, 1-methyl-2, 4-diisocyanato-cyclohexane, the chlorophenylene diisocyanates, naphthalene-1,5-diisocyanate triphenylmethane-4,4', triisocyanate, isopropylbenzene-alpha-4-diisocyanate, 5,6-bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-ene diisocyanate, 5,6-diisocyanatobutylbicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-ene and similar polyisocyanates.
Of particular interest in the present invention are trimethylhexamethylene diisocyanate available from VEBA, heptadecyl (C17) diisocyanate, DDI 1410 an aliphatic C-36 diisocyanate available from the Henkel Corporation of Minneapolis, Minn. (generally such diisocyanates having from 12 to 40 carbons in the aliphatic radical may be used in the present invention). Further urethane components are isophorone diisocyanate available from VEBA and Desmodur N an aliphatic triisocyanate available from Mobay. Desmodur N is more particularly defined as the reaction product of 3 moles of hexamethylene diisocyanate and water having an isocyanate equivalent weight as later defined of 191. Other adducts or prepolymers of the polyisocyanate include Desmodur L and Mondur CB which are the adducts of toluene diisocyanate. The foregoing materials have an isocyanate equivalent weight of approximately 250.
The amount of the polyisocyanate utilized in forming the urethane compositions of the present invention is expressed on a percentage equivalent weight basis with respect to the hydroxyl functionality of the hydroxymethyl polyol. Desirably, each hydroxy functional group on the alcohol will react on a 1:1 stoichiometric basis with the isocyanate functionality on the polyisocyanate compound. It is quite feasible, however, to form the urethane linkage using from about 80% to 120% preferably from about 95% to 105% on a hydroxyl-isocyanate equivalent basis of the polyisocyanate to form the urethane product. The determination of the amount of polyisocyanate required for a given polyol reactant is readily made using hydroxyl or isocyanate equivalent weights as is well known to those of skill in the art. Cross-linking polyurethanes are obtained whenever the hydroxyl functionality of the polyol reactant(s) is greater than two. Otherwise thermoplastic polyurethanes are produced.
To form the urethane reaction product, the polyol of the present invention and the organic polyisocyanate are mixed together in the proper proportions. When utilized as a coating the compounds are then quickly spread with a knife blade, brush or spray over the surface of the article to be coated. Where molded articles are desired various techniques such as casting, injection molding, reaction injection molding may be employed.
If desired, various urethane catalysts may be employed to promote the reaction. Examples of such urethane catalysts include trimethylene diamine, N-ethylmorpholine, dimethyl piperazine, triethylamine, N,N,N',N'-tetramethylbutane-1,3-diamine, dibutyltin dilaurate, stannous octoate, stannous oleate, and stannous tallate, as well as other art recognized urethane catalysts. Typical levels of the urethane catalyst are from about 0.001% to about 5% by weight of the urethane components.
As the products of the present invention are liquid, additional heating is only required where lower viscosity for efficient mixing is desired. For convenience the urethane reactants may be heated to the temperature of reaction typically from about 0 to about 110.degree. C., preferably from about room temperature, i.e., 22.degree. C. to about 85.degree. C. The system is operated under a high vacuum to degas the reaction mixture for about 15 minutes. The reaction mixture is then cured for a time period of from about one to twenty-four hours depending upon the curing temperature and the particular polyurethane formed. Optimum curing cycles can be readily determined without undue experimentation by those of skill in the art.
One or more modifying agents may be included in the reaction mixture to modify the properties of the resulting polyurethane. Such modifying agents include polyols which act as soft and hard segment contributors, fillers, dyes and plasticizers.
The production of polyurethanes from hydroxymethyl polyols of the invention is the subject of copending patent application Ser. No. 415,522, filed concurrently with this application by the same inventors.
Many of the hydroxymethyl polyols of the present invention are particularly valuable because they are liquid materials at room temperature. A functional analog is a polycaprolactone. However, polycaprolactones are solid or semi-solid at room temperature thus requiring heating. The products of the present invention are therefore particularly important for reaction injection molding (RIM) applications where the product is reacted within the mold after being furnished to the mixing chamber and thus to the mold in a liquid state. Accordingly, products of the present invention do not require extraneous heating sources along the feed lines to a RIM apparatus as do the caprolactone polyols. This leads to savings on the cost of energy and equipment normally required to maintain urethane reactants in liquid or semi-solid form for reaction. It also eliminates the need for solvents which are often required to maintain the reaction medium liquid. Urethane products prepared from the polyols of the invention also exhibit strong hydrolytic stability.

To further illustrate various aspects of the invention, the following Examples are provided. However, it is to be understood that these Examples are purely illustrative and are in no way intended to limit the scope of the invention.
EXAMPLE 1
To 740 grams, 2.2 moles, of 9(10)-methylhydroxymethyloctadecanoate (referred to hereinafter as C.sub.19 HME) were added 97.5 grams, 1.1 moles, of 1,4 butanediol. These reactants were heated to 85.degree. C. and a vacuum of 0.5 mm Hg was applied to degas the polyols. The vacuum was released after 30 minutes with nitrogen and 0.05 grams of tetrabutyl orthotitanate (9 ppm Ti) was added. Heat was gradually applied until methanol began to evolve at 167.degree. C. Heating was continued at 170.degree.-180.degree. C. for 4 hours, 200.degree. C. for 3 hours. At this point analysis by gas chromatography indicated that less than 1% unreacted C.sub.19 HME remained based on the weight of the sample taken. Methanol remaining in the reaction was removed under vacuum at 85.degree. C., stripping for about 50 minutes.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 368 and the viscosity was 11.3 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 2
To 660 grams, 1.97 moles, of C.sub.19 HME were added 62 grams, 1.0 mole, of ethylene glycol, and 0.12 grams of butyltin tris(2-ethylhexoate) (35 ppm Sn) was added. Heat was gradually applied until methanol began to evolve at 204.degree. C. Heating was continued at 204.degree. C. for 4 hours, 215.degree. C. for 11/2 hours. At this point analysis by gas chromatography indicated that very little unreacted C.sub.19 HME remained based on the weight of the sample taken. Methanol remaining in the reaction was removed under vacuum, stripping for about 50 minutes.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 446 and the viscosity was 14.0 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 3
To 205 grams, 0.6 mole, of C.sub.19 HME were added 119 grams, 0.6 mole, of bishydroxymethyl tricyclodecane. These reactants were heated to 140.degree. C. and a vacuum of 0.5 mm Hg was applied to degas the polyols. The vacuum was released after 15 minutes with nitrogen and 0.04 grams of butyltin tris(2-ethylhexoate) (24 ppm Sn) was added. Heat was gradually applied until methanol began to evolve at 186.degree. C. Heating was continued at 200.degree. C. for 81/2 hours. At this point analysis by gas chromatography indicated that less than 1% unreacted C.sub.19 HME remained based on the weight of the sample taken. Methanol remaining in the reaction was removed under vacuum at 180.degree. C., stripping for about 35 minutes.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 260 and the viscosity was 81.4 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 4
To 205 grams, 0.6 mole, of C.sub.19 HME were added 182.4 grams, 0.6 mole, of 9(10)-hydroxymethyloctadecanol (hereinafter referred to as C.sub.19 Diol). These reactants were heated up to 100.degree. C. and a vacuum of 0.5 mm Hg was applied to degas the polyols. The vacuum was released after 30 minutes with nitrogen and 0.06 grams of butyltin tris(2-ethylhexoate) (30 ppm Sn) was added. Heat was gradually applied until methanol began to evolve at 200.degree. C. Heating was continued at 200.degree. C. for 5 hours. At this point analysis by gas chromatography indicated that less than 1% unreacted C.sub.19 HME remained, based on the weight of the sample taken. Methanol remaining in the reaction was removed under vacuum at 100.degree. C., stripping for about 30 minutes.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 307 and the viscosity was 12.2 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 5
To 409.8 grams, 1.2 moles, of C.sub.19 HME were added 136.8 grams, 0.4 mole, of 9,9(10,10)-bis(hydroxymethyl)octadecanol (hereinafter referred to as C.sub.20 Triol). These reactants were heated 90.degree.-130.degree. C. and a vacuum of 0.5 mm Hg was applied to degas the polyols. The vacuum was released after 60 minutes with nitrogen and 0.08 grams of butyltin tris(2-ethylhexoate) (30 ppm Sn) was added. Heat was gradually applied until methanol began to evolve at 200.degree. C. Heating was continued at 210.degree. C. for 5 hours. At this point analysis by gas chromatography indicated that very little unreacted C.sub.19 HME remained, based on the weight of the sample taken. Methanol remaining in the reaction was removed under vacuum at 70.degree.-80.degree. C., stripping for about 50 minutes.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 429 and the viscosity was 30.7 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 6
To 286.9 grams, 0.8 mole, of C.sub.19 HME were added 119.8 grams, 0.8 mole, of trimethylol propane, and 0.06 grams of butyltin tris(2-ethylhexoate) (31 ppm Sn) was added. Heat was gradually applied until methanol began to evolve at 205.degree. C. Heating was continued at 212.degree.-228.degree. C. for 5 hours. Methanol remaining in the reaction was removed under vacuum at 210.degree. down to 70.degree. C. for about 115 minutes.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 151 and the viscosity was 28.9 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 7
To 322.7 grams, 0.9 mole, of C.sub.19 HME were added 122.6 grams, 0.9 mole, of pentaerythritol, and 0.05 grams of butyl tin tris(2-ethylhexoate) (27 ppm Sn) was added. Heat was gradually applied until methanol began to evolve at 215.degree. C. Heating was continued at 230.degree.-250.degree. C. for 5 hours. Methanol remaining in the reaction was removed under vacuum at 150.degree. C., stripping for about 120 minutes.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 219.3 and the viscosity was 46.6 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 8
To 322.7 grams, 0.9 mole, of C.sub.19 HME were added 61.3 grams, 0.45 mole, of pentaerythritol, and 0.05 grams of butyltin tris(2-ethylhexoate) (32 ppm Sn) was added. Heat was gradually applied until methanol began to evolve at 220.degree. C. Heating was continued at 220.degree.-245.degree. C. for 31/4 hours. Methanol remaining in the reaction was removed under vacuum for about 120 minutes. The product was stripped to remove solids.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 294.7 and the viscosity was 36.2 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 9
To 358.6 grams, 1.0 mole, of C.sub.19 HME were added 45.4 grams, 0.33 mole, of pentaerythritol, and 0.05 grams of butyltin tris(2-ethylhexoate) (31 ppm Sn) was added. Heat was gradually applied until methanol began to evolve at 250.degree. C. Heating was continued at 250.degree.-260.degree. C. for 21/2 hours. Methanol remaining in the reaction was removed under vacuum, stripping for about 120 minutes, and cooling from this reaction temperature. The product was filtered to remove solids.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 366.7 and the viscosity was 22.9 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 10
To 683.0 grams, 2.0 moles, of C.sub.19 HME were added 68.0 grams, 0.5 mole, of pentaerythritol, and 0.12 grams of butyltin tris(2-ethylhexoate) (33 ppm Sn) was added. Heat was gradually applied until methanol began to evolve at 200.degree. C. Heating was continued at 200.degree.-220.degree. C. for 5 hours plus 235.degree.-255.degree. C. for 7 hours. No methanol remained because of this high reaction temperature. The product was filtered to remove solid material.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 442.1 and the viscosity was 45.3 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 11
The polyunsaturated methyl esters from sunflower fatty acids were hydroformylated and reduced to produce a product with about 70% methyl bis(hydroxymethyl)octadecanoate, about 28% methyl hydroxymethyl octadecanoate and a small residue of saturated methyl fatty esters. This product had a saponification equivalent weight of 409.8 and a hydroxy equivalent weight of 204.
These hydroxy methyl esters (1 mole by saponification equivalent weight) were reacted with 1.5 moles of 1,4 butane diol by heating for 7 hours at 185.degree. C. with stirring while distilling off the methanol evolved by transesterification. After the reaction was complete the excess diol was removed by heat at 120.degree.-164.degree. C. under a vacuum of 0.2-0.5 mm Hg. Analysis by gas chromatography showed the product to have 0.5% residual 1,4 butane diol and a trace of the starting hydroxymethyl ester.
The equivalent weight of the resultant polyester polyol by hydroxyl analysis was 264.2 and the viscosity was 68 poise at 23.degree. C.
The hydroxyl functionality of the polyester polyol was greater than two.
EXAMPLE 12
To 335.8 grams, 1.0 mole, of C.sub.19 HME were added 30 grams, 0.5 mole, of freshly distilled ethylene diamine. The reaction was stirred in a vessel equipped with heating source and distillation take-off with a short vigreaux column. At 130.degree. C. distillate began to come over. Over a period of 1.5 hours the pot temperature was increased to 185.degree. C. where it was maintained for 3 hours. It was then raised to 200.degree. C. for an additional hour after which time 28 grams of distillate had been collected. The product was stripped at 70.degree. C. at 1 mm Hg for 1.5 hours.
The resulting hydroxy amide had a softening point of 40.degree. C., a hydroxy equivalent weight of 322 and an amine number of 15. Its viscosity at 50.degree. C. was 17.5 poise.
EXAMPLE 13
Using similar equipment and technique as described in Example 12, 335.8 grams, 1.0 mole, of C.sub.19 HME was reacted with 97.4 grams, 0.5 mole, of bis(aminomethyl) tricycloadecane. The reactants were heated at 205.degree. C. for 1 hour, 225.degree. C. for 1 hour and 255.degree. C. for 1.5 hours before stripping at 70.degree. C. under 0.3 mm Hg vacuum for 1 hour. The total distillate collected was 35 grams.
The product was a viscous liquid of 5650 poise at 23.degree. C. and 212 poise at 50.degree. C. The hydroxyl equivalent weight was 408 and the amine number was 15.
EXAMPLE 14
Using similar equipment and technique as in Examples 12 and 13, a hydroxy amide was prepared from C.sub.19 HME and anhydrous hexamethylene diamine in a molar ratio of 2:1, respectively.
This product had a hydroxyl equivalent weight of 390, an amine number of 6 and a viscosity at 50.degree. C. of 120 poise.
EXAMPLE 15
An amide having both hydroxy and amine functionality was prepared by reacting 1.0 mole of C.sub.19 HME with 1.0 mole (103.5 grams) of diethylene triamine for 3.5 hours at a temperature starting at 155.degree. C. and ending at 180.degree. C. The reactants were stripped under 4 mm Hg vacuum at 100.degree. C. for 20 minutes.
The product had an amine number of 234 and a viscosity at 23.degree. C. of 67.3 poise.
EXAMPLE 16
An amide having both hydroxyl and amine functionality was prepared by reacting 1.0 mole of C.sub.19 HME with 1.0 mole (158 grams) of triethylene tetramine in a manner similar to that described in Example 15.
The product had an amine number of 318 and a viscosity at 23.degree. C. of 92.5 poise.
In Examples 17-33, the elastomer properties were determined in accordance with the following elastomer test procedures:
______________________________________Tensile ultimate strength, ASTM D 412Percentage Elongation, ASTM D 412Split Tear, ASTM D 1938Compression Set, ASTM D 395, Method B, Type 1Water Absorption, ASTM D 570. 70.degree. C. H.sub.2 O, 24 hrsTorsional Rigidity, T.sub.f, T.sub.4 ASTM D 1043Durometer Hardness, ASTM D 2240Hydrolytic Stability SATRA Method, 14 psi, 120.degree. C. steam______________________________________ T.sub.f = temperature at which modulus in torsion reaches 45,000 psi T.sub.4 = temperature at which modulus in torsion reaches 3333 psi
EXAMPLE 17
The polyester polyol of Example 1 was used to prepare a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer. It was blended with a polyol and reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.22 80.9Modifying polyol 1,4 butanediol 0.33 14.8Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.564 82.0(a modified diphenylmethanediisocyanate (MDI) containinga high percentage of MDI and alesser amount of polycarbodi-imide adducts)______________________________________
The polyols were blended and degassed under vacuum at 70.degree. C. for 90 minutes. After cooling to 30.degree. C. vacuum was released and the diisocyanate was added. While blending under vacuum the exotherm of reaction raised the temperature to 35.degree. C. After 1 minute it was poured into prepared molds and cured for 24 hours at 100.degree. C. After curing the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity.
The elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 55 DTensile strength, psi 3850Elongation, % 240Split tear, PI 326Compression set, % 66Water absorption, 24 hrs at 0.2970.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 100% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -29.5T.sub.4 .degree.C. +36______________________________________
EXAMPLE 18
The polyester polyol of Example 2 was used to prepare a crosslinked polyurethane elastomer. It was blended with polyols and reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.14 64.5Modifying polyol 1,4 butanediol 0.12 5.2Modifying polyol C.sub.19 Diol 0.15 22.5Crosslinking polyol - C.sub.20 Triol 0.10 11.4Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.52 76.43______________________________________
The polyols were blended and degassed under vacuum at 70.degree. C. for 30 minutes. After cooling to 32.degree. C. vacuum was released and the diisocyanate was added. While blending under vacuum the exotherm of reaction raised the temperature to 70.degree. C. After 4 minutes it was poured into prepared molds and cured for 24 hours at 100.degree. C. After curing the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity.
The elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 54 DTensile strength, psi 3425Elongation, % 145Split tear, PI 274Compression set, % 34Water absorption, 24 hrs at 0.570.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability 94% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -25T.sub.4 .degree.C. +24______________________________________
EXAMPLE 19
The polyester polyol of Example 3 was used to prepare a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer. It was blended with a polyol and reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.34 87.5Modifying polyol Teracol-1000 0.06 32.5(a polyoxytetramethylene glycolof MW near 1000)Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.41 60.0______________________________________
The polyols were blended and degassed under vacuum at 60.degree. C. for 30 minutes. After cooling to 24.degree. C. vacuum was released and the diisocyanate was added. While blending under vacuum the exotherm of reaction raised the temperature to 72.degree. C. After 15 minutes it was poured into prepared molds and cured for 24 hours at 100.degree. C. Aftering curing the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity.
The elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 90 ATensile strength, psi 6020Elongation, % 285Split tear, PI 258Compression set, % 87Water absorption, 24 hrs at 0.770.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 98% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -8T.sub.4 .degree.C. +17______________________________________
EXAMPLE 20
The polyester polyol of Example 4 was used to prepare a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer. It was blended with a polyol and reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.28 84.6Modifying polyol 1,4 butanediol 0.28 12.4Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.57 83.0______________________________________
The polyols were blended and degassed under vacuum at 60.degree. C. for 45 minutes. After cooling to 28.degree. C. vacuum was released and the diisocyanate was added. While blending under vacuum the exotherm of reaction raised the temperature to 70.degree. C. After 4 minutes it was poured into prepared molds and cured for 24 hours at 100.degree. C. After curing the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity.
The elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 57 DTensile strength, psi 4161Elongation, % 165Split tear, PI 275Compression set, % 80Water absorption, 24 hrs at 0.570.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 100% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -9T.sub.4 .degree.C. +22______________________________________
EXAMPLE 21
The polyester polyol of Example 5 was used to prepare a crosslinked polyurethane elastomer. It was blended with a polyol and reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.233 100.0Modifying polyol 1,4 butanediol 0.233 10.5Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.477 69.5______________________________________
The polyols were blended and degassed under vacuum at 70.degree. C. for 90 minutes. After cooling to 30.degree. C. vacuum was released and the diisocyanate was added. While blending under vacuum the exotherm of reaction raised the temperature to 50.degree. C. After 4 minutes it was poured into prepared molds and cured for 24 hours at 100.degree. C. After curing the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity.
The elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 94 ATensile strength, psi 2420Elongation, % 120Split tear, PI 72Compression set, % 31Water absorption, 24 hrs at 0.570.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 34% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -22T.sub.4 .degree.C. +17______________________________________
EXAMPLE 22
The polyester polyol of Example 6 was used to prepare a crosslinked polyurethane elastomer. It was blended with a polyol and reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.34 53.2Modifying polyol Teracol-1000 0.11 59.5Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.46 67.3______________________________________
The polyols were blended and degassed under vacuum at 70.degree. C. for 60 minutes. After cooling to 40.degree. C. vacuum was released and the diisocyanate was added. While blending under vacuum the exotherm of reaction raised the temperature to 66.degree. C. After 5 minutes it was poured into prepared molds and cured for 24 hours at 100.degree. C. After curing the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity.
The elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 93 ATensile strength, psi 2966Elongation, % 110Split tear, PI 83Compression set, % 21Water sbsorption, 24 hrs at 1.570.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 62% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -7T.sub.4 .degree.C. +21______________________________________
EXAMPLE 23
The polyester polyol of Example 7 was used to prepare a crosslinked polyurethane elastomer. It was blended with a polyol and reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.37 81.2Modifying polyol Teracol-1000 0.062 33.2Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.45 65.6______________________________________
The polyols were blended and degassed under vacuum at 70.degree. C. for 60 minutes. After cooling to 43.degree. C. vacuum was released and the diisocyanate was added. While blending under vacuum the exotherm of reaction raised the temperature to 68.degree. C. After 5 minutes it was poured into prepared molds and cured for 23 hours at 100.degree. C. After curing the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity.
The elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 53 DTensile strength, psi 1813Elongation, % 60Split tear, PI 46Compression set, % 19Water absorption, 24 hrs at 1.070.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 70% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -26T.sub.4 .degree.C. +26______________________________________
EXAMPLE 24
The polyester polyol of Example 8 was used to prepare a crosslinked polyurethane elastomer. It was reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.40 119.1Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.41 60.9______________________________________
The polyol was degassed under vacuum at 70.degree. C. for 60 minutes. After cooling to 39.degree. C. vacuum was released and the diisocyanate was added. While blending under vacuum the exotherm of reaction raised the temperature to 73.degree. C. After 7 minutes it was poured into prepared molds and cured for 23 hours at 100.degree. C. After curing the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity.
The elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 53 DTensile strength, psi 1560Elongation, % 50Split tear, PI 50Compression set, % 10Water absorption, 24 hrs at 0.570.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 82% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -37T.sub.4 .degree.C. +23______________________________________
EXAMPLE 25
The polyester polyol of Example 9 was used to prepare a crosslinked polyurethane elastomer. It was blended with a polyol and reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.30 110.8Modifying polyol 1,4 butanediol 0.12 5.5Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.43 63.8______________________________________
The polyols were blended and degassed under vacuum at 70.degree. C. for 60 minutes. After cooling to 42.degree. C. vacuum was released and the diisocyanate was added. While blending under vacuum the exotherm of reaction raised the temperature to 70.degree. C. After 4 minutes it was poured into prepared molds and cured for 24 hours at 100.degree. C. After curing the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity.
The elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 94 ATensile strength, psi 1440Elongation, % 55Split tear, PI 41Compression set, % 23Water absorption, 24 hrs at 0.570.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 84% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -37T.sub.4 .degree.C. +17______________________________________
EXAMPLE 26
The polyester polyol of Example 10 was used to prepare a crosslinked polyurethane elastomer. It was blended with a polyol and reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.25 110.0Modifying polyol 1,4 butanediol 0.16 7.5Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.43 62.0______________________________________
The polyols were blended and degassed under vacuum at 70.degree. C. for 90 minutes. After cooling to 30.degree. C. vacuum was released and the diisocyanate was added. While blending under vacuum the exotherm of reaction raised the temperature to 50.degree. C. After 8 minutes it was poured into prepared molds and cured for 24 hours at 100.degree. C. After curing the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity.
The elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 93 ATensile strength, psi 1480Elongation, % 75Split tear, PI 44Compression set, % 12Water absorption, 24 hrs at 0.570.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 70% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -34T.sub.4 .degree.C. +15______________________________________
EXAMPLE 27
The polyester polyol of Example 11 was used to prepare a crosslinked polyurethane elastomer. It was blended with a polyol and reacted with diisocyanate as follows:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________Polyester polyol 0.22 59.4Modifying polyol Teracol-1000 0.025 12.3Isonate 143L diisocyanate 0.25 37.2______________________________________
The polyols were blended and degassed under vacuum at 70.degree. C. for 90 minutes. The vacuum was broken with N.sub.2 and the product was cooled to room temperature. The diisocyanate was then added. After degassing under vacuum for 3 minutes, the reaction mixture was poured into prepared molds at a temperature of 35.degree. C. It set 10 minutes after pouring and was cured overnight at 100.degree. C. Aftering curing, the elastomer was conditioned for 7 days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity before testing.
The properties of the polyurethane elastomer were as follows:
______________________________________Tensile strength, psi 1871Elongation, % 75Split tear, PI 103Water absorption, 24 hrs at 0.870.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 100% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -11T.sub.4 .degree.C. +14______________________________________
EXAMPLE 28
The amide diol of Example 12 was reacted with isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) using 73 wt. % of the diol to 27 wt. % of the isocyanate plus 0.017% of dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) as catalyst. The amide diol was heated with stirring to 70.degree. C. under N.sub.2 for 15 minutes then degassed under vacuum for 80 minutes. The IPDI was then added after cooling to 50.degree. C. and vacuum pulled for 3 minutes at which time the temperature had increased to 70.degree. C. The partially reacted mixture was poured into molds and cured at 100.degree. C. for 24 hours.
The polyurethane elastomer thus produced had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 89 ATensile strength, psi 1111Elongation, % 355Split tear, PI 134Compression set, % 45Water absorption 24 hrs at 2.070.degree.C., %Hydrolytic stability, 100% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -26T.sub.4 .degree.C. +13______________________________________
EXAMPLE 29
Using substantially the same technique described in Example 28, the C.sub.19 HME/ethylene diamine amide diol of Example 12 was blended with two modifying polyols, degassed and reacted with isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) in the presence of dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) catalyst in the following ratio:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________(C.sub.19 HME).sub.2 EDA 0.27 86.2Hydroxymethyloctadecanol 0.15 23.2Bis(hydroxymethyl)octadecanol 0.10 11.7IPDI 0.54 58.8DBTDL 0.03______________________________________
The polyurethane elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 65 DTensile strength, psi 5162Elongation, % 275Split tear, PI 447Compression set, % 30Water absorption, 24 hrs at 1.770.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 81% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -9T.sub.4 .degree.C. +29______________________________________
EXAMPLE 30
Using substantially the same technique as described in Example 28, the C.sub.19 HME/bis(aminomethyl) tricyclodecane amide diol of Example 13 was blended with three modifying polyols, degassed and reacted with isophorone diisocyanate in the presence of dibutyltin dilaurate in the following ratio:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________(C.sub.19 HME) BAMTCD 0.15 61.3Teracol-1000 0.075 39.9Hydroxymethyl octadecanol 0.13 19.5Bis(hydroxymethyl)octadecanol 0.086 5.4IPDI 0.45 49.5DBTDL 0.0312______________________________________
This polyurethane elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 88 ATensile strength, psi 2806Elongation, % 365Split tear, PI 154Compression set, % 12Water absorption, 24 hrs at 1.470.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 68% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -29T.sub.4 .degree.C. +12______________________________________
EXAMPLE 31
Using substantially the same technique described in Example 28, the C.sub.19 HME/hexamethylene diamine amide diol of Example 14 was blended with two copolyols, degassed and reacted with isophorone diisocyanate in the presence of dibutyltin dilaurate in the following ratio:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________(C.sub.19 HME).sub.2 HMDA 0.24 94.9Hydroxymethyl octadecanol 0.14 21.1Bis(hydroxymethyl)octadecanol 0.092 10.6IPDI 0.49 53.4DBTDL 0.06______________________________________
This polyurethane elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 93 ATensile strength, psi 1090Elongation, % 330Torsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -10T.sub.4 .degree.C. +15______________________________________
EXAMPLE 32
It is generally preferred to prepare the polyester polyols of the invention with an excess of polyol reactant as exemplified by this Example.
1.0 mole of C.sub.19 HME and 5.0 moles of urethane grade 1,4-butanediol plus butyltin tris(2-ethylhexoate) at 50 ppm Sn per C.sub.19 HME were heated and stirred in a reactor fitted with a short vigreaux column. At 200.degree. C. methanol began to evolve and continued to evolve for 1.5 hours while the temperature in the pot rose to 220.degree. C. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and analyzed by gas chromatography indicating that essentially all of the C.sub.19 HME had reacted. The product was stripped under 0.2 mm Hg vacuum at 108.degree.-120.degree. C. until all excess 1,4-butanediol was removed. A 1/1 ester diol of the formula: ##STR11## where m is 8 or 7 and n is 7 or 8, respectively was obtained in high yield together with a small amount of 2/1 diester diol of the formula: ##STR12## where m is 8 or 7 and n is 7 or 8, respectively.
This product had a hydroxyl equivalent weight of 214 and a viscosity of 3.7 poise at 23.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 33
An ester diol made as described in Example 32 was blended with modifying polyols and reacted with modified diphenyl methane diisocyanate (Isonate 143L) according to the following ratio:
______________________________________ Equiv. Grams______________________________________(C.sub.19 HME)BD 0.172 66.39Hydroxymethyl octadecanol 0.147 22.41Bis(hydroxymethyl)octadecanol 0.098 11.30Isonate 143L 0.517 76.0______________________________________
The polyols were degassed under vacuum at 65.degree. C. for 2.5 hours. The diisocyanate was added, the reactants degassed 4 minutes under vacuum and then poured into molds and cured 24 hours at 100.degree. C.
After conditioning six days at 23.degree. C. and 50% relative humidity, the polyurethane elastomer had the following properties:
______________________________________Shore hardness 56 DTensile strength, psi 3579Elongation, % 160Split tear, PI 241Compression set, % 21Water absorption, 24 hrs at 0.270.degree. C., %Hydrolytic stability, 100% retained tensile strengthTorsional RigidityT.sub.f .degree.C. -8T.sub.4 .degree.C. +25______________________________________
From the foregoing detailed description and Examples, it should be apparent that the invention encompasses a wide range of polyol compounds. It should also be apparent that while the invention has been described in terms of various preferred embodiments, and exemplified with respect thereto, those of skill in the art will readily appreciate that various modifications, changes, omissions, and substitutions may be made without departing frorm the spirit of the invention. It is therefore intended that the present invention be limited solely by the scope of the following claims.

Number	Name	Date
2186464	Mauersberger	Jan 1940
2243329	Groote et al.	May 1941
2329086	Robinson et al.	Sep 1943
3224893	Floyd et al.	Dec 1965
3622605	De Jong	Nov 1971
3770643	Heiba et al.	Nov 1973
3904661	Pusch	Sep 1975
4083816	Frankel et al.	Apr 1978
4093637	Miller et al.	Jun 1978
4161482	Nema	Jul 1979
4216343	Rogier	Aug 1980
4216344	Rogier	Aug 1980
4229562	Rogier	Oct 1980
4243818	Rogier	Jan 1981
4292187	Hentschel et al.	Sep 1981
4304945	Rogier	Dec 1981

Hydroxymethyl polyols

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

US Referenced Citations (16)