The present disclosure relates to hygienic systems. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to hygiene compliance systems for monitoring and communicating hygiene activities, such as hand washing activities.
Handwashing can be an effective approach to control hygiene. Environments, such as healthcare facilities, inherently have contamination risks and often have patients with higher sensitivity to contamination. Numerous handwashes may be required to conform with good hygiene practices. However, it can be difficult in practice for caregivers to remember to perform the numerous handwashes during a course of performing seemingly innocuous activities, for example upon entry to a patient room. Caregivers and visitors alike can pose hygiene risks that may be different in degree and/or impact. Further, in administering care in a large capacity facility, such as a hospital, narrowing the root cause of a hygiene issue is difficult during the execution of many different activities and with the presence of both caregivers and visitors.
The present application discloses one or more of the features recited in the appended claims and/or the following features which, alone or in any combination, may comprise patentable subject matter:
According to an aspect of the disclosure, a hygiene compliance system, includes a handwash sensor configured to transmit a handwash signal indicative of handwash device operation, at least one badge configured to transmit a signal, an occupant sensor configured to detect a number of persons in a predetermined proximity and to transmit an occupant signal indicative of the number of persons, and a remote computer configured to communicate with the handwash sensor and the occupant sensor, and the remote computer determines a hygiene compliance rate based on the handwash signal and the occupant signal.
In some embodiments, the remote computer includes a processor and a memory device, the memory device being configured to store instructions that when executed by the processor determine the hygiene compliance rate based on the handwash signal and the occupant signal.
In some embodiments, the hygiene compliance rate is based on a badged-handwash compliance rate comprising a number of badged-person handwash events compared to a number of required badged-person handwash events, and an unadjusted compliance rate comprising a number of total handwash events compared to a number of required total handwash events.
In some embodiments, the remote computer is configured to determine the number of required total handwash events based on the number of occupants detected by the occupant sensor.
In some embodiments, the hygiene compliance system further includes an interaction sensor, wherein the remote computer is configured to determine the number of required total handwash events based on an interaction signal from the interaction sensor indicative of interaction with a healthcare device.
In some embodiments, the hygiene compliance system further includes an interaction sensor configured to transmit an interaction signal indicative of interaction with the healthcare device.
In some embodiments, the healthcare device is a hospital bed and the interaction sensor is configured to detect interaction with the hospital bed and to transmit the interaction signal indicative of interaction with the hospital bed.
In some embodiments, the interaction sensor is configured to detect a movement of a siderail of the hospital bed and to transmit the interaction signal indicative of siderail movement.
In some embodiments, the interaction sensor is configured to transmit the interaction signal only if an exterior bed control is used to achieve the movement the siderail.
In some embodiments, the interaction sensor is configured to detect an adjustment of a position of a backrest of the hospital bed.
In some embodiments, the interaction sensor is configured to transmit the interaction signal only if an exterior bed control is used to achieve the adjustment of the position of the backrest of the hospital bed.
In some embodiments, the at least one badge, when within a predetermined proximity of the handwash sensor, receives a handwash sensor identification code and the handwash signal from the handwash sensor, and the at least one badge transmits a signal to the remote computer indicating the handwash sensor identification code, a badge identification code, and the handwash signal.
In some embodiments, the handwash sensor is configured to receive a badge identification code from the at least one badge being within a predetermined proximity of the handwash sensor, and to transmit a signal to the remote computer indicating a handwash sensor identification code, the badge identification code, and the handwash signal.
In some embodiments, the remote computer is configured to determine whether the hygiene compliance rate violates a threshold dictated by a hygiene operations scheme.
In some embodiments, the remote computer is configured to transmit an indicator signal indicating that the hygiene compliance rate violates the threshold to a local indicator to activate the local indicator to indicate non-compliance with the hygiene operation scheme.
In some embodiments, the predetermined proximity is a patient room of a hospital.
According to another aspect of the disclosure, a hygiene compliance system includes a handwash sensor configured to detect handwash device operation, at least one badge configured for signal transmission, an occupant sensor configured to detect a number of persons in a predetermined proximity, an interaction sensor configured to detect interaction with patient surroundings, and a remote computer configured to communicate with the handwash sensor, the occupant sensor, and the interaction sensor, and the remote computer determines a hygiene compliance rate based on the communications with the handwash sensor, the occupant sensor, and the interaction sensor.
In some embodiments, the predetermined proximity is a patient room of a hospital.
In some embodiments, the patient surroundings include a hospital bed and the interaction with patient surroundings includes adjustment of the position of the backrest of the hospital bed, and the interaction sensor is configured to communicate an interaction signal indicating the adjustment of the position of the backrest to the remote computer, and the remote computer determines the hygiene compliance rate based on the interaction signal.
According to another aspect of the disclosure, a hygiene compliance system includes a handwash sensor configured to transmit a handwash signal indicative of handwash device operation, at least one badge configured to transmit a signal, an occupant sensor configured to detect a number of persons in a predetermined proximity and to transmit an occupant signal indicative of the number of persons, and a remote computer configured to communicate with the handwash sensor and the occupant sensor. The remote computer determines a hygiene compliance rate based on the handwash signal, the occupant signal, and wash observation data from a third party observation information.
In some embodiments, the remote computer is configured to generate reports including a hygiene compliance rate associated with an individual caregiver and to automatically transmit a daily electronic message to the individual caregiver indicating the hygiene compliance rate associated with the individual caregiver.
In some embodiments, the remote computer is configured to automatically retrieve staff assignments from other hospital systems.
Additional features alone or in combination with any other feature(s), including those listed above and those listed in the claims and those described in detail below, can comprise patentable subject matter. Others will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the invention as presently perceived.
The detailed description particularly refers to the accompanying figures in which:
Good hygiene can be encouraged by reminding persons to wash their hands. Monitoring handwashing to control hygiene and indicating locally when handwashing is advisable can assist in reminding persons within the area to wash their hands appropriately. In a patient care facility, such monitoring and communication can decrease hygiene related issues. A hygiene compliance system monitors activities relevant to hygiene and determines, according to a hygiene operation scheme, whether to provide local indication that handwashing should be performed. In illustrative embodiments, a hygiene compliance system 10 monitors hygiene within a care facility, such as a hospital, and provides local indication of hygiene compliance or lack thereof.
An illustrative hygiene compliance system 10 is shown in
The handwash sensor 12 is configured to detect operation of a handwash device, such as a sink or a soap, foam or gel dispenser, as a handwash event and to communicate the detected operation of the handwash device to the remote computer 20. The handwash event is illustratively embodied as operation of a soap dispenser operation. The remote computer 20 determines a hygiene compliance rate and/or compliance index based on the information from at least one of the handwash sensor 12 and the occupant sensor 18 for local indication of compliance or non-compliance with a hygiene operation scheme.
The occupant sensor 18 of the hygiene compliance system 10 detects the number of occupants within a predetermined proximity as suggested in
The remote computer 20 receives communication signals from any of the handwash sensor 12, the badge 14, and the occupant sensor 18. The remote computer 20 is configured to monitor compliance with the hygiene operations scheme. The remote computer 20 compares information received from the communications signals and determines whether compliance with the hygiene operation scheme has been achieved. Upon successful compliance with the hygiene operation scheme, a local indicator 26 is operated to signal compliance.
When it is stated that the remote computer 20 receives signals from badge 14, it should be appreciated that badge 14 is included as part of a locating system, sometimes referred to as a real time locating system (RTLS), that includes intervening equipment between badge 14 and computer 20. For example, receivers of an RTLS are placed within rooms to receive signals from badges 14 and the receivers are coupled, either via wired connections or wirelessly, to gateways and/or servers. Thus, in some embodiments computer 20 is included as part of the RTLS and in other embodiments, computer 20 communicates with a server of the RTLS. Occupant sensor 18 is also considered to be part of the RTLS in some embodiments. However, its purpose is to sense all occupants in a room and not just those with badges 14. Thus, in the
The hygiene operations scheme is a system of hygiene compliance rules or protocols for maintaining and monitoring hygiene within a facility and/or system. For example, the hygiene operations scheme may require badged-room occupants (for example caregivers) of a hospital to wash their hands upon entry into a patient room. The hygiene operations scheme may be implemented through the remote computer 20 which receives information through communication signals from various sensors (such as those discussed above) and determines whether the information received indicates compliance with the hygiene operations scheme.
In illustrative embodiments, the hygiene operations scheme is stored on the remote computer 20. The hygiene operations scheme illustratively combines hygiene requirements of badged persons (such as caregivers) and hygiene requirements of general occupants (including all badged and non-badged persons such as caregivers and visitors) to dictate whether hygienic conditions are acceptable. Illustratively, the remote computer 20 monitors the hygiene of badged persons via communications from the badge 14 while general occupant hygiene is illustratively monitored for compliance by the remote computer 20 based on communications from the occupant sensor 18 and the handwash sensor 12. By monitoring hygiene for both badged persons (such as caregivers) and non-badged persons (such as visitors), hygiene monitoring system 10 can effectively monitor all persons occupying an area to provide a more complete hygiene assessment tool. Integrating badged hygiene tracking with general hygiene tracking can create a more accurate hygiene assessment tool by integrating high and low precision and/or resolution tools and can provide more accurate local indication of hygiene compliance. Such combined hygiene tracking can allow cost-effective implementation while providing an ability to narrow the source of contamination and create detailed reporting.
In illustrative embodiments, the remote computer 20 monitors badged persons' hygiene for compliance with the hygiene operations scheme as suggested in
In illustrative embodiments, the remote computer 20 monitors general person hygiene based on communications from the occupant sensor 18 and the handwash sensor 12 as suggested in
A general handwash event occurs when the handwash sensor 12 detects operation of the handwash device without a badge 14 within the wash proximity. The handwash sensor 12 communicates with the remote computer 20 to indicate operation of the handwash device. The remote computer 20 illustratively receives communication signals from the handwash sensor 12 indicating handwash device operation without a badge identification code, and from the occupant sensor 18 indicating the number of persons within the patient room.
In illustrative embodiments, the remote computer 20 determines a hygiene compliance rate based on the communication signals received. The remote computer 20 illustratively determines the hygiene compliance rate based on a combination of a badged-person compliance rate and an unadjusted compliance rate. The remote computer 20 illustratively determines the badged-person compliance rate based on the number of badged-person handwash events communicated by the handwash sensor 12 as a portion of the required badged-handwash events according to the hygiene operations scheme. For example, if the hygiene operations scheme dictates 13 required badged-person handwash events (caregiver handwash events) under given conditions, and only eleven badged-person handwash events were communicated to the remote computer 20 from two different badge identification numbers, the badged-person compliance rate, as a percentage is determined to be 100× 11/13=84.6%.
In illustrative embodiments, the remote computer 20 determines the unadjusted compliance rate based on the number of general occupants as determined by the occupant sensor 18 and the number of general handwash events as communicated from the handwash sensor 12 to the remote computer 20. For example, during the same period of time as the example above, if the occupant sensor 18 detects there are seven general occupants in the patient room and the remote computer 20 determines that the hygiene operation scheme dictates a required 25 general-person handwash events under the given conditions, and the handwash sensor 12 communicated 17 general handwash events, the unadjusted compliance rate, as a per centage, would be 100× 17/25=68%. However, as discussed above, because the badged-person compliance rate was determined to be 11/13, eleven of the 17 total sensed handwash events were badged-handwash events, the remote computer 20 would then determine a non-badged compliance rate, as a per centage, to be 100× 6/25=24%.
In this example, the remote computer 20 determines the hygiene compliance rate, as a per centage, to be 100×17 total handwashes/(25 general handwashes required+13 badged-handwashes required)=>100×17 achieved/38 total required handwashes)=44.7%. The given example is not intended to provide limitation to the methodology that may be used in determining compliance rates and is intended only to provide a baseline example. In some embodiments, any of the compliance rates may be determined by any number of statistical evaluations and/or adjustments based on historic, current, or predictive information and/or communications generated or received by the remote computer 20. In some embodiments, the remote computer 20 may consider the number of badge identification numbers contributing to the total badged-person compliance rate in determining any of the required general-person handwash events, the non-badged compliance rate, the unadjusted compliance rate, and/or the hygiene compliance rate.
In illustrative embodiments, the remote computer 20 receives communication signals from any of the handwash sensor 12, badge 14, and occupant sensor 18. The remote computer 20 stores information from the received communication signals and determines the compliance rates based on the stored information. The remote computer 20 illustratively includes a memory device 22 and processing unit 24 as suggested in
The memory device 22 is configured to store the instructions for execution by the processing unit 24. The memory device 22 illustratively stores the hygiene operations scheme for query by the processing unit 24 and response thereto. In illustrative embodiments, the instructions include at least one algorithm configured to determine the hygiene compliance rate based on the communication signals received by the remote computer 20. In some embodiments, the instructions may include reference charts, lookup tables, or the like and may be configured to be updated through a communication link (not shown) to support debugging, enhanced features, and or updated control design. In some embodiments, the memory device 22 may include one or more volatile and/or non-volatile storage devices including local and/or remote storage devices and may include one or more devices that are dedicated and/or shared between other hospital systems. For example, the memory device 22 may include multiple dedicated memory devices of different hospital systems that may be configured for communication therebetween, including importing and exporting of stored information, whether manually or automatically.
The processing unit 24 of the remote computer 20 is configured to receive communication signals from any of the handwash sensor 12, the badge 14, and the occupant sensor 18 for storage as information in the memory device 22; to query the memory device 22 and receive responses; to determine compliance with the hygiene operations scheme based on the information stored; and to output an indicator signal to communicate compliance or noncompliance with the hygiene operation scheme. In illustrative embodiments, the processing unit 24 is a microprocessor or a microcontroller. In some embodiments, the processing unit 24 may include one or more processing devices including local and/or remote processors and may include one or more devices that are dedicated and/or shared between other hospital systems. For example, the processing unit 24 may include multiple dedicated processing devices of different hospital systems that may be configured for communication therebetween and/or for communication with memory devices of other hospital systems.
In some embodiments as suggested in
As indicated at block 86 which follows block 84, the processing unit 24 determines whether the compliance rates are less than the minimum compliance rates. Minimum compliance rates are illustratively embodied as fixed values predetermined by configuration of the hygiene operations scheme, for example as set by an administrator. In some embodiments, minimum compliance rates may be determined by the processing unit 24 based on inputs from one or more hospital systems. In some embodiments, the processing unit 24 may execute hygiene operations instructions stored on the memory device 22 to determine the minimum required compliance rates and/or required handwash events as dictated by the hygiene operations scheme. The processing unit 24 illustratively compares the determined compliance rates to the required minimum compliance rates.
In illustrative embodiments as suggested in
In illustrative embodiments as suggested in
In some embodiments, the local indicator 26 illuminates green when all required minimum compliance rates have been achieved. The local indicator 26 illustratively illuminates red when any required minimum compliance rates have not been achieved. In some embodiments, the local indicator 26 may include any other component and/or process to indicate compliance and/or non-compliance with the hygiene operation scheme including but not limited to any visual and audio indications with varying rates and/or intensities and may be configured to indicate compliance and/or non-compliance with multiple requirements of the hygiene operations scheme through different and/or varying indications, for example, illuminating a yellow color to indicate achievement of minimally required, but not preferred, compliance rates. In some embodiments, a graphical user interface (GUI) included on the bed or mounted on a room wall serves as indicator 26. In such embodiments, textual information regarding compliance and non-compliance is displayed on the GUI.
The remote computer 20 illustratively can be accessed by an authorized user (such as a caregiver) to review historic hygiene information including handwashing events and types (e.g., types of handwash devices, badged and/or general handwash events), compliance rates, numbers of occupants and other information communicated thereto and may select criterion with which to delimit the return information. An authorized user can select a time period across which to review the historical hygiene information to provide an ability to narrow contamination sources and otherwise review overall hygiene compliance trends, for example by hour, shift, day, or month. An authorized user can select one or more occupant specific criterion across which to review the historical hygiene information to provide an ability to narrow contamination sources and otherwise review overall hygiene compliance trends, for example by badge number, caregiver role, hospital unit, floor, room, patient, etc. The remote computer 20 is configured to provide customizable hygiene reports indicating historical hygiene information for selected time periods. The remote computer 20 is configured to display a map of at least portions of the care facility, for example, a portion of a specific floor as selected by an authorized user, and to display the historic hygiene information as delimited including percentages on the map for review, as shown, for example, in
The remote computer 20 may be configured to output messages indicating the compliance reports including historic hygiene information with selected delimitations and to send such reports automatically to indicated users. For example, computer 20 is configurable to send an e-mail message to a designated computer device (e.g., personal computer, tablet computer, smart phone, etc.) of a caregiver with her daily compliance rate, and with the compliance rate of her overall unit for the week. The remote computer 20 is configured to permit user-configuration of the messages and the frequency of the messages (e.g., daily, hourly, at the end of each shift, and so forth) to assist in communicating hygiene information. In connection with the monitored and e-mailed compliance rate information, in some embodiments, this is a per centage as compared to an adherence goal that is less than 100%. For example, if a caregiver has an adherence goal of 70% but only washes his or her hands 35% of the time that a handwashing protocol dictates, then the caregiver is 50% adherent as compared to the goal of 70%. The % compliant toward an adherence goal is the % that is e-mailed to caregivers in some embodiments.
In illustrative embodiments, the handwash sensor 12 includes a radar-based activation sensor of a touchless soap dispenser that activates the dispenser and communicates its identification code and dispenser operation to the remote computer 20, as suggested in
In illustrative embodiments, the occupant sensor 18 is a dedicated thermal imaging device configured to detect the number of occupants in a patient room. In some embodiments, the occupant sensor 18 may be configured to detect entry and exit of occupants to and from a given area for recording entry and exit events respectively. In some embodiments, the occupant sensor 18 may include one or more beam counters, video/visual counters, any other combinations of hardware and/or software to detect the number of persons within the given area and/or entry and exit events form the given area, and/or any combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the occupant sensor 18 includes a processor and memory and/or may rely on the remote computer 20 for the same. In some embodiments, the occupant sensor 18 may be a combined sensor used with multiple systems requiring occupancy information.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends consideration of five moments of exposure including before touching a patient, before a clean procedure, after body fluid exposure, after touching a patient, and after touching patient surroundings as suggested in
In illustrative embodiments, the hygiene operations scheme dictates the required badged-person handwash events based on the locations within a patient room through which the badge 14 passes as detected by various badge proximity sensors 32 illustratively positioned in hygiene sensitive areas throughout the patient room as suggested in
In illustrative embodiments, the hygiene operations scheme dictates the required badged-person handwash events, the required general-person handwash events, and the minimum compliance rates based on patient surroundings events (PSE) as indicated by one or more interaction sensors 16 of the hygiene compliance system 10. The interaction sensors 16 are configured to detect interaction with patient surroundings for recording as PSE's by the remote computer 20 as suggested in
The interaction sensors 16 are illustratively configured to detect occupant interaction with a healthcare device and to communicate an interaction signal (illustratively shown as block 80d of
In illustrative embodiments, if a badge 14 is within a predetermined interaction proximity from the interaction sensor 16 during detection of the occupant interaction, the badge 14 receives an identification code of the interaction sensor 16 and the interaction signal for communication to the remote computer 20. Illustratively, if no badge 14 is within the predetermined interaction proximity from the interaction sensor 16 during detection of the occupant interaction, the interaction sensor 16 transmits the interaction signal to the remote computer 20. The remote computer 20 illustratively receives the interaction signal, stores information based on the interaction signal, determines the required handwash events as dictated by the hygiene operations scheme and determines the minimum required compliance rates based on the interaction signal. The remote computer 20 illustratively marks each PSE as “Compliant” or “Not Compliant” based on whether the required badged-person handwash events are satisfied by communication of badged person handwash operation.
In illustrative embodiments, the healthcare device is a hospital bed 28 as shown in
In illustrative embodiments as suggested in
In
In
In
In
In
In illustrative embodiments as suggested in
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In some embodiments, multiple entry events, exit events, PSE's, and/or combinations thereof may be satisfied by one or more handwash events conducted within overlapping predetermined amounts of time, for example, if two different PSE's are recorded in close time and a single handwash event occurs within the predetermined amounts of time from each PSE, the remote computer 20 may mark both PSE's as “Compliant.” In some embodiments, badge-person handwash events may only satisfy badged-person initiated PSE's, and general-person handwash events may only satisfy general occupant initiated PSE's.
In some embodiments, the hygiene operations scheme may be configured to be updated through a communication link (not shown) to support debugging, enhanced features, and or updated control design and may be configurable to turn on and off certain PSE triggering events and/or adjust the hygiene compliances rules via the remote computer 20. In some embodiments, the hygiene operations scheme may include qualitative factors for consideration in determining compliance rates, for example, a ranking of the hygienic risk associated with particular areas, healthcare devices, seasons, and/or other variables. The information regarding such variables is communicated to the remote computer 20 for storage and consideration in interpreting the hygiene operation scheme and determining the minimum compliance rates. In some embodiments, any of the minimum compliance rates may be determined by any number of statistical evaluations and/or adjustments based on historic, current, or predictive information and/or communications generated or received by the remote computer 20. A non-limiting example may include a weighted-matrix stored and maintained in the remote computer 20 that is updated based on historical hygiene data to apply weighted averages in determining the minimum compliance rates.
In some embodiments, the local indicator 26 may include a local display for showing text and/or images. The local indicator 26 may be configured to receive and display communications from a variety of hospital systems to provide visual communication of patient-specific information such as infection risk/isolation, allergies, and/or do not resuscitate instructions. The local indicator 26 may be configured to receive and display communications prescribing required assets such as lifts, stretchers, and/or wheelchairs, and may be implemented with asset tracking and/or detection sensor, for example on the bed 28, configured to trigger an audio and/or or visual alert if an occupant attempts to move a patient from the bed 28 without the proper asset in a proper location relative to the bed 28 to preempt and/or prevent improper lift attempts. An attempt to move a patient from the bed 28 may be inferred by the remote computer 20 based on the interaction sensor 16 detecting lowering of the siderail in combination with any other bed data information such as patient weight or movement of the patient on bed 28.
In some embodiments, the remote computer 20 receives information regarding hygiene observations from a third party. The remote computer 20 is illustratively configured to receive input from an authorized user that they have observed an action which requires subsequent handwashing. The authorized user may illustratively manually input on a hand held device any of the time, date, identifying information of the observed person, room number of the occurrence, type of occurrence (i.e., entrance/exit, other contamination), and whether a subsequent handwash was performed, and/or device used for handwashing.
The remote computer 20 is illustratively configured to incorporate the third party observation information into the determination of compliance rates. In some embodiments, the remote computer 20 may be configured to receive third party observation information from another device such as a tablet computer. Integration of third party observation information can assist in tracking, monitoring, revising, and trouble-shooting hygiene issues. Thus, system 10 receives some handwashing information automatically and receives other handwashing information via manual entry. For example, in a hospital, one wing may have the equipment installed for automatic monitoring of handwashing events (e.g., the equipment discussed herein in connection with
In some embodiments, the third party information is provided to computer 20 as a comma-separated values (CSV) file. In one embodiment, the CSV file information is imported into a spreadsheet by computer 20 having the column headings event_time, staff_member, room, enter_leave, and adherent. In the event_time column, the date and time that an event occurred is stored. In the staff_member column, the name of the staff member that performed the entry or exit is stored. In the room column, the name (or number) of the room the staff member entered or exited is stored. In the enter_leave column, the words “enter” or “leave” are stored depending upon whether the staff member was entering or leaving the room. In the adherent column, a “1” is stored if the staff member washed their hands and a “0” is stored if otherwise.
Based on the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the present disclosure contemplates a software rules engine that can establish a need for an indicator or protocol, updating an indicator on a bed utilizing bed connectivity. The rules engine would continue to monitor the indicator or protocol, and would modify the displayed status indicator appropriately. For example, a hygiene compliance rules engine would require that a staff member utilize a dispenser within a defined time period, such as a number of seconds, upon entering a patient room. When a staff member enters a room, the locating solution would register staff presence, and initiate the protocol. If the system did not receive an indication of a wash event, the bed status indicator would change to provide staff feedback to utilize a hygiene station prior to interacting with the patient. Non-locating based events could also be associated with the rule engine to interact with locating information. For example, using bed data (patient weight and/or siderail position), along with asset tracking (lift presence), an indicator can be triggered on the bed that if the siderails are lowered and the patient is above a safe weight, an audible and/or visual indicator preempts the staff member form attempting to lift the patient without a proper lift in the proper location. This leverages the indicator on the bed and can replace alerts such as text messages and/or staff tag tones to provide indication to the staff member. These notifications can provide proactive notification prior to patient interactions and can prevent possible unsafe conditions such as improper lifts and/or hygiene.
The present disclosure may also include updated backend reporting to support technology and usability improvements; the ability to specify individual compliance goals and generate reports reflecting percentage adherence to specified goals; may display on interfaces quickly; ability to access current map and reports from a mobile device; simplified web view that display group scores; third-party observation data import of wash observation data including importing of csv file that contains wash information, and including that data in reports; ability to automatically push and/or retrieve assignment information such as staff assignments between different hospital systems such as a nurse call system and the remote computer 20; ability to email individual compliance scores to each individual under a pre-configured email to be automatically appended to the user name (i.e., userA as userA@hill-rom.com).
In illustrative embodiments, PSE's include detection by interaction sensor 16 that a position of a bed siderail has been changed. In some embodiments, PSE's may including triggering of bed functionality including but not limited to percussion/vibration/rotation therapies on/off; bed exit on/off; bed exit type; bed exit silence (i.e., suppresses bed exit); alarm silence (i.e., turns the beeping off); head of bed angle; bed position (i.e., bed low/chair mode etc.); head rail status; foot rail status; nurse call indicator button press; weigh patient; capture weight in system; bed brakes on/off; patient movement magnitude; patient movement direction; patient detected; CPR mode switch; bed cleaned switch. Additional PSE triggers can be added as needed and the system is configured to turn on and off any of the PSE triggers.
In some embodiments, communications, signals, transmissions, and indications may be carried out, partly or wholly, through one or more of wireless and wired connections and may include one or more intermediary devices between the source and the destination. Wireless connections may include any type of wireless protocol such as Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11b/g/n), WiMax (IEEE 802.16e), Zigbee (e.g., 802.15.4), mobile communications technologies such as 3G or 4G technology, radio frequency (RF), and/or other wireless protocols. In some embodiments, proximity limitations may be enforced by configuration of the wireless connections to support only a limited range of communication, for example, by signal strength. Communications and communications signals may be communicated as secured and or encrypted in any known manner.
In illustrative embodiments, the handwash sensor 12, badge 14, interaction sensor 16, and occupant sensor 18 communicate directly with the remote computer 20. In some embodiments, one or more of the handwash sensor 12, badge 14, the interaction sensor 16, and occupant sensor 18 may communicate with the remote computer 20 through one or more intermediate communications devices, for example, the badge 14 may communicate received signals from any of the handwash sensor 12 and/or the interaction sensor 16 with the remote computer 20 through an intermediate device located within the patient room while the occupant sensor 18 communicates directly with the remote computer 20. In some embodiments, the handwash sensor 12 and/or the interaction sensor 16 may read the identification code of the badge 14 and may communicate both badged and non-badged operations of the handwash device and the identification codes of the respective sensor and the badge 14 to the remote computer 20, without transmission through the badge 14. In some embodiments, intermediary devices may receive one or more communication signals and may transmit any of one or more identical communication signals, combined communication signals, manipulated communication signals, duplicated communication signals and/or any combinations thereof. In some embodiments, intermediary devices may receive one or more types of communication signals and may transmit one or more different types of the communication signals, for example, if an intermediary device receives and transmits a signal both with wireless connections, the intermediary device may receive a signal as one type of wireless connection and transmit a signal of a different type of wireless connection.
In illustrative embodiments, the badge 14 is a single badge 14 that is Wi-Fi enabled for communication with the remote computer 20. In some embodiments, badge 14 may include one or more badges 14. Badges 14 may be assigned to each caregiver and other hospital personnel and may be used as a dedicated badge or as a badge for multiple systems. Badge identification codes are illustratively embodied as unique identifications code for each badge. In some embodiments, badge identification codes may be user (caregiver) specific and/or made indicate specific information about a user (caregiver), for example, badge identification codes may include indication of a caregiver's identity, assigned unit, assigned floor, and/or level of authority.
Sensors and other devices that explicitly and/or implicitly communicate, indicate, receive, and/or transmit any information, communications, indications, transmissions, and/or signals may include one or more receivers, transmitters, and/or combined receiver/transmitters as required to perform their functions.
According to this disclosure, the hygiene compliance system 10 receives information regarding caregiver-to-room and/or caregiver-to-patient assignments from another system within the healthcare facility. For example, some nurse call systems, such as the NaviCare® Nurse Call system available from Hill-Rom Company, Inc., have caregiver-to-room and/or caregiver-to-patient assignments or associations manually entered therein by a charge nurse or other staff member tasked with entering such information into the nurse call system. The nurse call system communicates, transfers, sends, or otherwise provides this information to system 10, according to this disclosure, so that the same caregiver-to-room and/or caregiver-to-patient associations do not have to be entered a second time. This increases caregiver efficiency by eliminating the need for redundant data entry in two different systems. Thus, this disclosure contemplates caregiver assignment integration between system 10 and one or more other systems within a network of a healthcare facility.
Although certain illustrative embodiments have been described in detail above, variations and modifications exist within the scope and spirit of this disclosure as described and as defined in the following claims.
The present application claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/197,898, which was filed Jul. 28, 2015, and which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4275385 | White | Jun 1981 | A |
4601064 | Shipley | Jul 1986 | A |
4896144 | Bogstad | Jan 1990 | A |
5016172 | Dessertine | May 1991 | A |
5095925 | Elledge et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5119104 | Heller | Jun 1992 | A |
5199118 | Cole et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5202666 | Knippscheer | Apr 1993 | A |
5265628 | Sage et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5276496 | Heller et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5291399 | Chaco | Mar 1994 | A |
5355222 | Heller et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5387993 | Heller et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5426425 | Conrad et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
RE35035 | Shipley | Sep 1995 | E |
5455851 | Chao et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465082 | Chao | Nov 1995 | A |
5515426 | Yacenda et al. | May 1996 | A |
5548637 | Heller et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5561412 | Novak et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572195 | Heller et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573041 | Skell et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5594786 | Chao et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5610589 | Evans et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5633742 | Shipley | May 1997 | A |
5670945 | Applonie | Sep 1997 | A |
5689229 | Chaco et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694323 | Koropitzer et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695091 | Winnings et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699038 | Urlich et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702115 | Pool | Dec 1997 | A |
5745272 | Shipley | Apr 1998 | A |
5771925 | Lewandowski | Jun 1998 | A |
5774865 | Glynn | Jun 1998 | A |
5781942 | Allen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785181 | Quartararo, Jr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793653 | Segal | Aug 1998 | A |
5808553 | Cunningham | Sep 1998 | A |
5812059 | Shaw et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818617 | Shipley | Oct 1998 | A |
5822418 | Yacenda et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822544 | Chao et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823447 | Maybach | Oct 1998 | A |
5838223 | Gallant et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5862546 | Kim | Jan 1999 | A |
5870105 | Jensen | Feb 1999 | A |
5900067 | Jones | May 1999 | A |
5900801 | Heagle et al. | May 1999 | A |
5939974 | Heagle et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945910 | Gorra | Aug 1999 | A |
5952924 | Evans et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954069 | Foster | Sep 1999 | A |
5960991 | Ophardt | Oct 1999 | A |
5966753 | Gauthier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6000429 | Van Marcke | Dec 1999 | A |
RE36530 | Heller et al. | Jan 2000 | E |
6031461 | Lynn | Feb 2000 | A |
6038331 | Johnson | Mar 2000 | A |
6104295 | Gaisser et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125482 | Foster | Oct 2000 | A |
6147607 | Lynn | Nov 2000 | A |
6154139 | Heller | Nov 2000 | A |
6195588 | Gauthier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211788 | Lynn et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219164 | Morgaine | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236317 | Cohen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236953 | Segal | May 2001 | B1 |
6278372 | Velasco, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283759 | Price et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6377868 | Gardner, Jr. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392546 | Smith | May 2002 | B1 |
6399853 | Roe et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404837 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426701 | Levy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6485979 | Kippenhan et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6519505 | Formon | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524390 | Jones | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6718341 | Berstis et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727818 | Wildman et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7015816 | Wildman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7248933 | Wildman | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7408470 | Wildman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7450024 | Wildman et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7812730 | Wildman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8368544 | Wildman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8598996 | Wildman et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
9349267 | Wildman et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9396638 | Wildman et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20040198158 | Driscoll et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060132316 | Wildman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080001763 | Raja | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100164728 | Plost | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110121974 | Tenarvitz et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20130120142 | Wildman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140266732 | Barbeau | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292518 | Wildman et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19903079 | Aug 2000 | DE |
2 985 739 | Feb 2016 | EP |
2324397 | Oct 1998 | GB |
2328867 | Mar 1999 | GB |
WO 9310311 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9731350 | Aug 1997 | WO |
2014145400 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report from related EP 16 18 1426 dated Jan. 9, 2017, 16 pages. |
Carol Hildenbrand, One Hand Better Wash the Other, CIO Enterprise, Oct. 15, 1997 (1 page). |
Kathleen G. Tatterson, Employees Can't Wash Away Restroom Sensor, Photonics Spectra, Jul. 1997 (1 page). |
Marian Burros, Wash Up: Big Brother Is Now in the Bathroom, New York Times, Nov. 19, 1997 (1 page). |
John Hendren, Hand-washing detection system to get dirt on employees, Business @marillo Globe-News, May 20, 1997 (3 pages). |
Robert O'Harrow Jr., Big Brother in the Bathroom?, Washingtonpost.com, Aug. 30, 1997; p. A01 (3 pages). |
Joni A. Mayer et al., Increasing Handwashing in an Intensive Care Unit, Infection Control 1986/vol. 7, No. 5 (4 pages). |
Elaine Larson et al., Effect of an Automated Sink on Handwashing Practices and Attitudes in High-Risk Units, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Jul. 1991 (7 pages). |
Elaine Larson, Hand Washing—It's Essential—Even When You Use Gloves, American Journal of Nursing, Jul. 1989 (8 pages). |
Marian K. Fox et al., How Good Are Hand Washing Practices?, American Journal of Nursing, Sep. 1974 (3 pages). |
William M. Marcil, Handwashing Practices Among Occupational Therapy Personnel, The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 47, No. 6, Jun. 1993 (6 pages). |
High-tech Hygiene: Monitoring System to Badger Employees Who Don't Wash Hands, The Spokesman-Review, Sep. 1, 1997 (2 pages). |
Business Wire, Net/Tech to unveil patented Hygiene Guard Hand-Washing Monitoring System at the National Restaurant Show, Apr. 3, 1997 (2 pages). |
Hygiene Guard description from the Captology website, Stanford University, http://www-pcd.standford.edu/captology/resources/cep/catalog/hg.html, Oct. 9, 1999 (“Captology”), available at https://web.archive.org/web/19991009104253/http0://www-pcd.stanford.edu/captology/resources/cep/catalog/hg.html (1 page). |
Broughall, et al., “An automatic monitoring system for measuring handwashing frequency in hospital wards,” Journal of Hospital Infection (1984) 5, 447-453 (7 pages). |
Pittet, “Improving Adherence to Hand Hygiene Practice: A Multidisciplinary Approach,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 7, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2001 (7 pages). |
“Cyro-Cell affiliate announces successful testing of world's first infrared hand washing monitoring system,” memo, Business Wire, Inc., May 13, 1997 (1 page). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170032656 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62197898 | Jul 2015 | US |