The present invention relates generally to an improved structural configuration and method for assembling structures with hyperbolic paraboloid faces.
There have long been efforts to construct buildings and tents that span a floor area without the need for intrusive interior supports. The typical approach is to assemble a framework of rigid linear materials, which is then covered with a surfacing material, or skin.
Stresses must be carried by a combination of tension and compression members, organized into a system that carries the distributed loads of the skin, and focuses them onto several support points on the ground. The total of all compression forces equals the total of all tensile forces. When seen together, the pathways of these forces form triangular patterns within the whole structure, and these patterns are best managed by designing triangles directly into the framework.
From the simplest to more complex space-enclosing shapes:
(1) The traditional pup-tent, (a prism-shape, or, alternatively, a pyramid shape), had to be anchored to the ground, in part to make more usable interior space by pulling the sagging skin outward. This puts additional tension on the skin, and compression on the poles. It also takes up space on the exterior, making it difficult to walk around the tent without tripping on these tension lines. Other prism shapes, such as the “A-frame” buildings, also have problems, one of the biggest being their large surface areas, through which heat is lost.
(2) Another traditional solution has been to use a cubical configuration, in which the walls are vertical, and are made rigid by the application of sheathing materials or diagonals inserted into the framing. The roof is typically constructed by means of trussing, resulting in either a peaked or a flat roof. A big drawback is that this type of building requires more lumber per square foot of usable space than either a geodesic dome, or a “hypershelter”. A lot of material is used in the trusses, and the over-all building is thus top-heavy. A volume of the covered space is unusable, being inside the jungle of triangles in the attic. The instant invention contains a greater usable volume for a given surface area than any cubical structure, and is therefore more economical both in the expenditure of materials, and in the amount of labor required.
(3) A solution recently employed has been to use a dome shape with the outward forces being supplied by very long tent-poles, held under constant stress by being bent. This is very workable on small scales, and yields good strength-to-weight ratios as well as high volume-to-surface-area ratios because of the near-hemispherical shape. However, such stressed arches are not effective when rigidity is desired, and it is difficult to apply to larger structures for two reasons: (A): Assembling long, continuous, stressed framing members becomes more unwieldy as size increases, and (B): Strength-to-weight ratios decrease as overall size increases, because weight goes up on a function of the cube of the increase, whereas strength only increases on a squaring function. This makes it difficult to find the appropriate material of sufficient resiliency to support its own weight when used as a stressed arch.
(4) The use of panel constructions which can be assembled into building structures of various sizes, shapes, and types. Systems for attaching the panels to each other; and building structures of panel-type construction, are well known in the art. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 3,945,160 to Grosser.
(5) Also known in the art is the assembling of panel constructions into geodesic dome structures. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 4,160,345 to Nalick. The connectors for forming the structures by joining panel construction together is also well known in the art. For example see U.S. Pat. No. 6,173,547 to Lipson. When constructing a geodesic dome type structure such as in U.S. Pat. No. 2,682,235 to Fuller, or U.S. Pat. No. 6,295,785 to Herrman, a bottom edge is created that is typically raised over a substantially cylindrical portion into which doors and windows are fitted. As with these references and with U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,564 to Fahey, cells are typically arranged in circular rows. Each cell has edges, and as with triangles, they require special connectors and edge materials, which increase the cost of construction.
The geodesic dome, (U.S. Pat. No. 2,682,235 to Fuller,) has many advantages which are achieved by means of straight-member, all-triangle framing where all stress problems are dealt with directly, the forces being sent predictably along straight struts. The weight is distributed downward and outward along these, and rests on the base at many points. The curved shape, and the orientation of the struts means that most struts act in compression to carry weight loads, though any strut can also come under tension, depending on specific forces acting on the whole structure.
On a large scale, the dome is assembled from a multiplicity of smaller pieces, and is usually covered with some rigid surfacing material, which acts, at shared edges, to reinforce the struts. While not containing quite the volume per unit surface area of the geodesic dome, the instant invention, hypershelter has the above advantages of the geodesic dome, but avoids the following disadvantages:
Problems arising in construction of a geodesic dome:
1) The triangles, though mass-producible in repeating patterns in a geodesic dome, create challenges in cutting covering materials, because these are commonly produced in rectangular forms, and require cutting to specifications which inevitably entail waste of unusable scraps.
2) The erection of the framework of a geodesic dome usually involves assembling the struts into successive courses of triangles, which, on large scales, requires the use of a crane and/or scaffolding. These initial courses are very unstable until the succeeding courses are assembled on them.
3) There are a large number of edges between triangles in a geodesic dome, and these constitute a very great length, simply because the triangle is the shape with the most perimeter to surface area. Although the planes join at obtuse angles so the ridges are less sharp, these edge lengths constitute a serious problem for the geodesic dome. The instant invention requires a minimum of such ridges, or edges. An N-way hypershelter has only N ridges.
4) Associated with the above is the difficulty of creating openings such as windows and doors, which must either be restricted within given triangles, or require the radical shape and re-engineering required in the creation of dormers or other protrusions. Openings such as skylights made in roof panels also engender the care and expense required in waterproofing.
5) Another drawback of the geodesic dome structures is that highly sophisticated crews and specialized connecting hardware must be employed for construction.
The hypershelter configuration has the capability of spanning large areas without the requirement that there be any internal supports. In this regard, it resembles a dome structure, such as the geodesic, which can be varied to span larger areas per height by taking a shallower slice of the sphere. In the hypershelter, a similar variation can be achieved by using shorter leg members, and varying the height of the apex. But, the hypershelter spans these large areas while allowing large openings at the periphery for the ingress and egress of goods and people. These openings are triangular, making them rigid by design, and can be varied down to lower profiles while remaining vertical. Additional vertical supports can then be added without interfering with the over-all utility of the structure. The shape of the over-all structure sweeps out to these openings along the smooth curvature of the hyperbolic paraboloid faces, so that there is no need for sudden protrusions and sharp-edged valleys, as in the typical dormer constructions.
The main spanning members in the roof are at the ridges, so each is at the edge of two convergent planes. The planes are leaning in compression against each other. Thus, their own weight is being supported by the structural members of these planes, and distributed downward across their faces. The great spanning capacity is thus accomplished without the need for the multiplicity of faces, edges, struts, or connectors occurring in the geodesic dome. Related to these benefits is that the hypershelter can be covered in large, continuous areas, rather than piecemeal.
Other structures, most notably roofs, have been made using hyperbolic paraboloids for the beauty and great strength afforded by such. See H. H. Charles, U.S. Pat. No. 3,186,128. Also, Eugene Pryor, U.S. Pat. No. 3,757,478 and Paul T Hodess, U.S. Pat. No. 3,846,953, beams hinged for erection of hyperbolic paraboloid roofs; and Harry L Guzelimian, U.S. Pat. No. 3,280,518, Curved roof support system; and. Daniel F. Tully U.S. Pat. No. 4,137,679, Inverted, doubly-curved umbrella hyperbolic paraboloid shells with structurally integrated upper Diaphragm; and Ray A Woods U.S. Pat. No. 5,020,287 Structural Building Components; and Solomon Kirschen U.S. Pat. No. 4,320,603 Roof construction; and Arthur T Brown, U.S. Pat. No. 3,200,026 Method of producing a Shell Roof structure; and Peter E. Ellen, U.S. Pat. No. 5,069,008 Building panel.
But, in those constructions, the builders have resorted to the use of expensive pre-formed panels to achieve the compound curvature required in a hyperbolic paraboloid shape, or other elaborate preforms, or have designed complex connectors. The instant invention achieves the hyperbolic paraboloid shape by the use of commonly available framing materials, applied successively to an under-framing, and covered with strips of roofing material (such as sheet metal, plywood, thatching, etc) successively bent into place while being applied. In the preferred hypershelter, the completed structure efficiently encloses volumes, as well as providing roofing for covering areas, because the lower portions of the hyperbolic paraboloid faces act partly as walls. Problems in the erection of the frameworks are also overcome in the instant invention by the pre-assembly on the ground, and wholesale, umbrella-like deployment of the framework as described herein.
It would therefore be beneficial to have a structural configuration and method for erecting same that encloses a large volume per unit surface area, and minimizes the need for edge connectors, specialized strut connectors, or custom dormers, and provides for openings that can be used as windows or doors, and is capable of being constructed by average unskilled or semi-skilled crews. This is possible with the instant invention.
The hypershelter is a structural configuration and method for assembling structures of widely various scales for such uses as playground equipment, hanging ornaments, and for shelters, such as tents, barns, commercial buildings, residences, stadiums, airplane hangars, etc, by the construction of three or more joined hyperbolic paraboloid elements created from commonly available materials.
The instant invention may be used as a structure which collects the distributed load of the roof, focusing it continuously downward to the three or more points of support at the base, the ground, a suitable foundation or set of support walls, so it requires no intrusive interior supports, and methods are provided herein for creating these structures using commonly available materials.
The curvature of each face is achieved by the succession of progressively oriented, near-parallel, straight framing members together with successively applied strips of covering materials. The covering materials are joined to the framing, and to each other, making the entire structure a continuous whole. To accommodate the gradual curvature only requires a slight twisting of each sheet of the covering materials as they are applied to the framing. The hyperbolic paraboloid curvature thus achieved allows the covering materials to play a role in supporting their own weight.
In medium to larger scales, a tension member (“tension restraining member”), attached at the peaks of the triangular openings, and running circumferentially around the structure stabilizes the framework during construction, and restrains the outward thrust imposed by weight such as a snow-load resting on the roof.
Each face has a compound curvature, arching inward vertically, and curving outward horizontally (a hyperbolic paraboloid) in the preferred embodiment. Within the framing, a series of optional radial braces connecting each pair of successive members from the base to the peak may be attached, following a locus of lines forming an arch, capable of carrying great loading forces to the ground. Additional such arches can be formed, each running substantially parallel to the primary ones. The tension restraining member also exerts an upward force on the framing in the hyperbolic paraboloid spans, which adds to the load-bearing capability. For some uses, semi-liquid materials such as cement, foam, or fiberglass with resin, which are designed to harden when cured, may be applied onto the hyperbolic paraboloid surfaces.
Optional vertical support posts may be added around the periphery, attaching to leg members. Besides carrying weight, these will provide framing to which doors, windows, and surfacing materials may be attached, completing the enclosure.
The subject matter of the present invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. However, both the organization and method of operation, together with further advantages and objects thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in connection with accompanying drawings wherein like reference characters refer to like elements.
Hypershelters have three or more hyperbolic paraboloid faces. A hypershelter of N faces is generally N-way symmetrical, with N being greater than 3. For each hypershelter symmetry, there are innumerable variations. The preferred embodiment, a variation in symmetry N=4, has equal leg and ridge members and is chosen for its ease of construction, and for its high volume-to-surface-area ratio.
Now referring to
Now referring to
Now referring to
Now referring again to
Now referring to
Now referring to
Now referring again to
The tension restraining member, 40, is applied between peak joints and adjusted until a prescribed distance is reached. In the preferred four-way embodiment, the distance between peak joints is four-thirds the chosen length, C. The tension restraining member, connecting each of the peak joints to the two nearest, is to stabilize the assembled framework during and after construction. It is recommended that the cable be positioned under the in-framing members to avoid interference with the roofing, and to help support the area around the center of each hyperbolic paraboloid face. In the procedure wherein the under-frame is to be fully erected without the in-framing, temporary braces running congruent with or parallel to the pyramid lines, 11, may be connected, one end near the apex, and one end near the foot joint. After erection of the underframing, and after the inframing, the tension restraining member and the sheathing are in place, these temporary braces should be removed, as they intrude into the usable volume of the hypershelter.
Finally, the entire framework is raised to a given height by the application of upward force on the peak joints. The foot joints are then adjusted to previously-marked positions at the base, and the framework takes its final shape. Now referring again to
Additional layers of in-framing
The last step is the application of covering materials
Now referring to
Referring again to
An enclosure which is spherically symmetrical can be formed with this embodiment, having a total of 12 hyperbolic paraboloid faces, on 12 a-planar quadrilaterals in a symmetry similar to that of a rhombic dodecahedron by the following method: Two of the structures of the preferred embodiment are connected at the foot joints, forming four pairs of triangular openings between them. Each pair forms an a-planar quadrilateral which is the same as the initial ones. When in-framing is added, the same hyperbolic paraboloid loci are thereby formed. One use for these might be as Christmas tree ornaments, with the chosen length, C, at 2 or 3 inches.
In a 5-way embodiment,
An interesting five-way might be one in which the foot joint distances are equal to the pyramid lines, or 1.618 (Known as “phi”, or the golden proportion) times C. This would enable the construction of another enclosure which is spherically symmetrical, with a total of 30 hyperbolic paraboloid faces, symmetrically similar to a rhombic triacontahedron.
In a 6-way, the pyramid line lengths can be arbitrarily reduced from the initial layout in order to achieve vertical triangular openings. This will accommodate their use as modules, fitting together to form clusters.
There are two separate operations which may be applied to vary the over-all shape of a hypershelter: The first is to vary the positions of the peak joints, and the second is to vary those of the foot joints. These variants can be modeled simply in the underframing, without reference to the inframing, as the inframing will follow the forms of the resulting quadrilateral frames.
Beginning with the model of any hypershelter, without varying the positions of the foot joints, the peak joints may be varied outward to the limit in which the ridge lines are parallel to the base plane. At this point, the apex height is equal to that of the peak joints. With the apex either above or below them, the peak joints may be varied inward to the limit in which they meet at the axis.
Similarly, the foot joints reach their outwardly varied limit when the legs become parallel to or lie on the base plane. With foot joints either above or below the peak joints, the foot joints may be varied inward to the limit in which they meet at the central axis.
Either operation may be applied to any given position of the other. Certain embodiments may thereby be formed which are simply mirror images, or upside-down versions of certain others.
Embodiments Derived at the Varied Foot Joint Positions
The leanings of the triangular openings and the a-planarity of the quadrilaterals also change when one adjusts the positions of the foot joints. When the foot and peak joints are varied to a certain point, the planes formed by the ridge members have slopes equal to those formed by the legs, and the quadrilaterals are simply planar. If the apex is above the peak joints, a new a-planarity forms as the foot joints are moved outward, and the ridge members slope more steeply than the legs.
This results in the hyperbolic paraboloid faces having reversed curvatures, and is described herein as a “flying hypershelter” in reference to its aesthetics. A point is reached wherein the legs are horizontal. At this point there are no longer any triangular openings and the structure then appears as in
If instead, one moves the foot joints inward when they are below the peak joints, the triangular openings lean further outward, and the a-planarity of the quadrilaterals increases. The limit is reached when the foot joints meet at a point on the central axis, forming a configuration having no triangular openings, thus forming another variation usable in ornamental applications.
Variations in Relative Lengths of Legs and Ridge Members
Constructing the legs shorter than the ridges makes the triangular openings lean inward less, which may be desired for higher values of N, where one may wish to have vertical triangular openings. The shorter legs also allow more base area per height, or greater spanning capability.
In symmetries where N is even, leg members and their opposite ridge members may be varied, while remaining equal to each other, while the other two members of each a-planar quadrilateral are unchanged. This results in a set of a-planar parallelograms, and the symmetry becomes N/2 of the original.
Needs of Structure Determines Embodiment to be Used
By modifying the relationships as above one can find a hypershelter configuration to fit a wide variety of purposes.
Construction Procedures in the Preferred Embodiment
Referring again to
There are five parameters which can be varied to achieve a desired configuration: 1) height along the axis, from apex to base, 88, 2) heights of peak joints, 68, 3) distances between foot joints, 29, 4) distances between peak joints, 31, and 5) the pyramid lines, 11.
A hypershelter may be created by the following steps: (a) generating a model of a hypershelter, (b) choosing components with which to form a hypershelter according to the model; and (c) fastening the components to each other according to the model, and raising it into place for completion.
A model may be established by arranging N triangles (triangular openings) symmetrically around the axis, positioning them substantially vertically, so that each pair of the 2N legs is joined to the next at the base to form the N foot joints. Connected to the N peaks of these triangles (peak joints) are the N ridge members, which then join at the apex. In the preferred example, this would be: 4 triangles, formed of the 8 leg members, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, each pair joined to the next at the base to form 4 foot joints, 21,23,25,27. Connected to the 4 peak joints, 22,24,26,28, are the 4 ridge members, 42,44,46,48, which join at the apex, 20. Together these form the outline, or the “underframing” of a hypershelter.
A variation in the form of the hypershelter may be obtained in which the leg members are unequal, the lengths of which are chosen according to the effect desired. If N is an even number, and half of the leg members are to be shorter, the ridge members opposite may also be of the same length, to maintain parallelism. However, the preferred form is that in which all leg members are equal.
The triangular openings may be arranged leaning outward, leaning inward, or vertical, depending on desired results. The outward lean of the preferred isosceles right triangles is approximately 70.5 degrees from the planar base, in which the resulting height, 68, at the peak joints is ⅔ of the leg or ridge length. In this preferred position, the ridge members, 42,44,46,48, join the leg members, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, at the peak joints, 22,24,26,28 at 90 degrees to each, have lengths equal to those of the leg members, and have an angle of 70.5 degrees to the vertical axis, whereat they join each other, forming a point called herein the apex, 20. Preferred length of ridge members is equal to that of the leg members, and the height, 88, from planar base to apex is also that same length, herein referred to as the “chosen length”, C.
Variations to the preferred can also be had, wherein the lengths of the ridge members are greater than or less than the leg members, depending again on results desired. Lengths so chosen will also affect the leaning angles of the triangular openings. Other variations involve the relationships of the inward or outward positioning of the foot joints or the peak joints, and whether the apex or the foot joints are above or below the peak joints. (See Variations, above).
Constructions Made by Folding Sheet Material
Another method may be used to create hypershelter structures, especially on small scales where the tension members are difficult to apply within tiny margins of error. Smaller structures, which may be used as ornaments, or as models for larger hypershelters, can be constructed by the following procedures:
Step 1: On sheet material, such as cardboard, plywood, sheet metal, or paper, draw a set of N quadrilaterals meeting at an apex in the center, as in
Step 2: Cut the sheet material along the outer edges of your pattern (legs) and along the inner edges (ridges) at any gaps.
Step 3: Fold the sheeting upward along pyramid lines, 11. Fold the sheeting downward along the ridge lines (42,44,46,48 in the 4-way). If you are using heavier material such as plywood, the folds must be done after cutting along the appropriate lines, and connecting as in step 4.
Step 4: If there are gaps, or added quadrilaterals, connect these with materials such as tape or tie plates.
Step 5: Establish the desired shape by placing the foot joints (21,23,25,27 in the preferred) at the desired positions on a base. Various embodiments may be made by choosing positions further inward or outward from the center.
Step 6: Attach inframing (51,53,55,57,59 in the preferred) between the upper folds, which represent ridges (42,44,46,48 in the 4-way), and the cut edges, which represent legs. For very small models, toothpicks may be used as inframing, being glued in place substantially parallel to each other at equal intervals along the “legs” and “ridges”.
Step 7: Narrow strips of covering material may be added, running substantially perpendicular to the inframing, each strip being applied with a slight twist. On very small scales, however, it is usually sufficient just to attach many pieces of inframing to represent the hyperbolic paraboloid curvature.
The folded sheet material is not a necessary part of the hypershelter, but is primarily used as a means to arrive at defined configurations for the underframing. Nevertheless, it may be left in the structures for various purposes, such as for ornamental uses.
Volumes: For any hypershelter of symmetry N, there is a variation in height-to-base-area ratios, wherein the volume-to-surface-area ratio is a maximum. The volume may be estimated by adding the volume of the inner pyramid, and the N tetrahedrons whose outer corners are the peak joints. For the preferred embodiment, the inner pyramid is formed between the base and the imaginary lines between the apex and the foot joints, (pyramid lines, 11). The faces of this pyramid are equilateral triangles, each bordered by two pyramid lines, 11, and a foot joint line, 29. Its volume is: Area of the base times height divided by 3.(?2×?2×⅓). There are 4 right tetrahedrons inside the pyramid along the axis, and there are 4 identical ones outside it, (outlined by, for example, members 17,18,42, and lines 11,11,29). sharing the above equilateral triangles. Thus the total of the tetrahedral volumes is equal to that of the pyramid, and the total volume of the under-framing, as defined above is then 4/3 times C cubed. There is an additional bit of volume between this and the hyperbolic paraboloid surfaces. A line connecting the peak joints, 31, the a-planar quadrilateral lines, (for example, 16,17, and 42,48,) and the pyramid line, 11, form the edges of a smaller tetrahedron which volume is divided in half by the hyperbolic paraboloid surface of the hypershelter. So, 4/27 times C cubed is added to the total, making the hypershelter volume equal to 40/27 times C cubed. The surface area, including that of the triangular openings, is approximately 5.975 times C squared. An additional bit of volume lies under the peak joints, between the outwardly leaning triangular openings, 2, and the base, 1 and vertical support posts which may be added along the peak joint height lines, 68. The volume of each of these extra tetrahedrons is 1/27 times C cubed, so another 4/27 is added, for a grand total of 44/27. The Vol/surface=. 3/11, or 0.272727 C.
The range of variations having the greatest volumes per surface area are those between a “tall” hypershelter with an apex height of twice the peak joint heights, and a “flat” one with an apex height equal to the peak joint heights, where the ridge members are horizontal. In examples using N=4, the ratio in the preferred is 0.2727 C. Using the same base area, in the “tall” embodiment, it is 0.2588 C. The “flat” one is 0.24536 C. It is within these ranges that the best anti-kiting effects may also be obtained.
A variation may be obtained wherein the foot joints are moved outward until there are no more triangular openings. The legs are then horizontal, as in
The above describes how a set of leg members and ridge members can be chosen to be joined together to form what is herein called the under-framing of a hypershelter. This under-framing is then the substrate onto which is attached additional framing, called herein the in-framing. There are four under-frame members: two leg members, and two ridge members, outlining the space between a foot joint, the two nearest peak joints, and the apex. It is these four which form the “a-planar quadrilateral frames” across which are to be fitted the in-framing, which in turn defines the curvature of the hyperbolic paraboloid faces. The number of inframing members to be attached depends on the frequency and scale of the desired hypershelter. Inframing members (for example,
In an example wherein the chosen length is to be, say, 12′, one may wish to place the in-framing members at a distance of 2′ apart from each other, and from the underframing members, making six equal separations. Thus, in the following example, there will be five equally-spaced points placed along one leg member, and one opposite ridge member, to which the inframing is to be attached.
Instructions For Assembling An Example of the Preferred Embodiment
Erection Method 1: Raising the Structure at the Peak Joints.
The assembled framework can be erected in a one-operation procedure, once the tension restraining members, 40 are attached. For small to medium-sized structures, if four workers are available, one is stationed at each of the four peak joints,
Erection Method 2: Moving the Foot Joints Inward by Means of Cables.
The second umbrella-like erection method requires that a second, lower cable be attached through slideable attachments, such as pulleys, at the foot joints, 21,23,25,27. The end of the cable is attached at one foot joint, passed through each of the others, and returns to the same foot joint and into a tool capable of exerting great tension, such as a winch. After the tension restraining member is firmly in place, lift and temporarily support each of the peak joints at a convenient height above ground level, to create a non-zero slope for the faces. Then, tighten said lower cable gradually, pulling the foot joints inward to their appropriate locations. This procedure may also be done without pulleys, using N cables connecting each pair of foot joints, and N winches, and tightening each in turn progressively. After the foot joints are securely mounted on their support blocks (or floor positions, etc) the lower cable(s) can be released, and removed.
Erection Method 3: Tilting Up of Tetrahedral Sections.
For the larger hypershelters, or when working in a confined space, it may be advisable to take a more step-wise approach: First, three structural members are assembled by laying out two legs and a ridge member for each, (for example,
The sheeting
It may be advisable to attach the uppermost sheets first, as a ladder may need to protrude between the framing during construction, and one would not want to block access. Screws or nails can be used in the sheeting attachment. When complete, such rigidity is achieved that, in an experiment, a prototype using 10′ chosen lengths framed in 2″×2″s on 2½ foot centers, and covered in light sheet metal, supported the whole weight of a workman on the top, fastening the ridge caps. This prototype then endured a windstorm with 65 mph gusts, having no part of it tied down or anchored to footings, and suffered no damages.
Other Embodiments Possible
While several embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention in its broader aspects.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3016115 | Harrison et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3049785 | Chiado et al. | Aug 1962 | A |
3092932 | Wilson | Jun 1963 | A |
3252469 | Peake | May 1966 | A |
3502091 | Corbin | Mar 1970 | A |
3846953 | Hodess | Nov 1974 | A |
5000211 | Speare et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5331780 | Tully | Jul 1994 | A |
6578593 | Leonarz | Jun 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080244992 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |