The present invention relates generally to hysteroscopy systems, and, more particularly, to a hysteroscopy system having a small size for use in an office setting.
Hysteroscopy refers generally to the inspection of a uterine cavity using a hysteroscope with access through the cervix. As such, hysteroscopy allows diagnosis of intrauterine pathology and, furthermore, can be used for surgical intervention. The hysteroscope typically includes a scope and a sheath.
One problem associated with some current hysteroscopy systems is that they must be used in an operating room setting with the patient being under some type of anesthesia. Anesthesia is required in particular because the size of current hysteroscopes is large and, as such, they can cause discomfort and pain to the patient. For example, a typical hysteroscope may have an outermost diameter of about 9 millimeters. Such hysteroscopes include a scope having a diameter of about 8 millimeters and a sheath having a diameter of about 9 millimeters. In comparison, scientific literature on the subject agrees that hysteroscopy can be performed using a vaginoscopic approach, which can be performed in an office setting, only when the outermost diameter of the hysteroscope is about 6 millimeters or less.
Another problem associated with current scopes is that they typically include a blunt flange at the scope distal end. The flange extends outwardly from the scope and make it difficult, if not impossible, to use the scope without the sheath and/or without an obturator. Accordingly, the size of some current hysteroscopes is limited to the size of the scope and the sheath, e.g., a diameter of 9 millimeters.
What is needed, therefore, is a hysteroscope system for an office setting that addresses the above-stated and other problems.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a hysteroscopy system is directed to performing a medical procedure in an office setting. The hysteroscopy system includes a scope having an outer surface, an internal channel defined by an inner surface, and a distal end. A sheath is removably coupled to the scope and has a tip at which a distal flange extends internally towards the outer surface of the scope. The sheath also has an inner surface and a plurality of outflow holes near the distal flange. An outflow channel is formed between the inner surface of the sheath and the outer surface of the scope, the distal flange forming a distal end of the outflow channel. An operative channel is formed within the internal channel of the scope for receiving at least one of a surgical tool and an inflow fluid, and a visualization channel is formed adjacent to the operative channel for receiving a visualization device.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a hysteroscopy system for a medical procedure includes a scope in the form of an elongated tubular member having an outer surface and an internal surface. The internal surface of the scope defines an internal channel of the scope. A sheath is in the form of an elongated tubular member removably coupled to the scope, the sheath having an outer surface and an internal surface. The sheath has a flange extending internally towards the outer surface of the scope at a distal end of the sheath. An operative member is located within the internal channel of the scope and is in the form of an elongated D-shape tubular member. The operative member has an outer surface and an internal surface, the outer surface being spaced away from the internal surface of the scope to form a visualization channel.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a hysteroscopy system includes a scope having an outer surface and an internal channel, and a sheath removably coupled to the scope. The sheath has an inner surface and a distal flange, the distal flange extending internally towards the outer surface of the scope. An outflow channel is formed between the inner surface of the sheath and the outer surface of the scope, the distal flange forming a distal end of the outflow channel between the scope and the sheath.
Additional aspects of the invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the detailed description of various embodiments, which is made with reference to the drawings, a brief description of which is provided below.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Referring to
According to some exemplary embodiments, the hysteroscope system 100 is intended for morcellation of uterine pathology with a scope and accessories having a sufficiently small diameter that can be inserted into a patient's uterus using the vaginoscopic approach. In particular, the hysteroscope system 100 provides a way to minimize patient pain because a tenanculum and speculum are not typically used.
Furthermore, anesthesia is not needed and the medical procedures can be performed in an office setting. This may result, for example, in a quicker surgery with less pain and quicker recovery, and may potentially lower the cost of the surgery. Yet another advantage of the hysteroscope system 100 is that a surgeon has the option to decide if they prefer greater flow instruments (e.g., with a coupled sheath 104) or smaller diameter instruments (e.g., with a removed sheath 104), depending on the patient case.
Referring to
The operative member 120 receives internally a surgical tool 122, which can be selected from a variety of different tools. For example, the surgical tool 122 can be a rotary morcellator, a reciprocating morcellator, or a morcellator having both reciprocal and rotary capabilities. The scope 118 further includes a visualization device 124. The visualization device 124 is adjacent to the operative member 120 and can include various image devices. For example, the visualization device 124 can include fiber-optic technology for illumination and image transmission.
To maintain continuous outflow, a plurality of outflow holes 126 are formed near the distal end 114 of the sheath 104. The inflow valve 106 (shown in
Referring to
According to the illustrated embodiment, the shape of the flange 130 is non-uniform. For example, a second side 130b extends a greater distance internally towards the center of the scope 118 than a first side 130a. Similarly, based on the symmetric features of this embodiment, a fourth side 130d extends a greater distance internally towards the center of the scope 118 than a third side 130c. In alternative embodiments, the flange 130 can have different shapes and sizes.
Referring to
The operative member 120 has an outer surface 120a, an internal surface 120b, and a flat outer surface 120c (clearly shown in
The outflow channel 128 is formed between the internal surface 104b of the sheath 104 and the outer surface 118a of the scope 118. An inflow channel 134 is formed in the internal channel of the scope 118. If the surgical tool 122 is removed, the inflow channel 134 is simply the entire internal channel of the scope 118. If the surgical tool 122 is in place, the inflow channel 134 is limited to the area between the surgical tool 122 and the internal surface 120b of the operative member 120.
Referring to
The scope 118 has an oval shape with a long diameter D3 of about 5.15 millimeters and a short diameter D4 of about 4.6 millimeters. The operative member 120 has a curvature dimension L1 of about 3.1 millimeters and a flat dimension L2 of about 3.95 millimeters.
The relatively small dimensions of the hysteroscopy system 100 allows a patient to be treated in an office setting. Generally, medical procedures may be provided to a patient with the use of the current hysteroscopy system 100 such that little or no anesthesia may be necessary. Clearly, one advantage of the hysteroscopy system 100 is that it is sufficiently small in diameter to be suitable for the vaginoscopic approach.
Referring to
In contrast to previous scopes, the scope 118 does not have a flange extending outwards from its distal end. The outward extending flange of the previous scopes unnecessarily increased the outermost diameter of the respective scopes and created an obtrusive distal end that made it difficult, if not impossible, to introduce into a patient without a sheath and obturator.
Referring to
The cannula 135 allows for continuous outflow but does not extend beyond the distal end of the scope 118. For example, the cannula 135 provides a replacement for the outflow channel 128, which is removed with the removal of the sheath 104. Specifically, the cannula 135 provides an alternative outflow channel 138 to replace the outflow channel 128 formed by the sheath 104. As such, continuous flow can be maintained even if the sheath 104 is removed.
Referring to
The distal ends of the tubular elements 142, 144 terminate at different points within the operative member 120. Preferably, the distal end of the inflow tubular element 142 terminates at the distal end 114 of the scope 118, and the distal end of the outflow tubular element 144 terminates some distance away from the distal end 114 within the operative member 120. The termination of tubular elements 142, 144 at different points along the operative member 120 eliminates the possibility of fluid short-circuit and provides better circulation and, hence, irrigation within the uterus.
According to one example, the flow device 140 is made of stainless steel and, as such, can be a reusable device. According to another example, the flow device 140 is made from a much more cost-effective material, such as a polymer. If a polymer is used, the flow device 140 will typically be considered a single-use device.
In practice, for example, a surgeon will insert the flow device 140 into the operative member 120 of the hysteroscope 102 prior to introduction into the uterus of a patient. After hysteroscope introduction into the uterus, an inflow valve 146 of the flow device 140 will be opened and the uterus will be distended. Then, by opening an outflow valve 148 of the flow device 140, irrigation is achieved. In the case of a diagnostic procedure, the flow device 140 could stay in place for the duration of the surgery. In the case of an operative procedure, the flow device 140 is removed and an operative tool (e.g., the morcellator 112) is inserted into the scope 118.
While the best modes for carrying out the present invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention within the scope of the appended claims. For example, the sheath 104, the scope 118, and the surgical tool 122 can be circular, oval, or any other smooth shape (i.e., an unobtrusive shape such as a shape that does not have a outward extending flange). In another example, the operative member 120 can have a circular shape or any other similar shape to the illustrated D-shape.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/358,848, filed on Mar. 20, 2019, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/846,198, filed on Sep. 4, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,251,539, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/892,355, filed on Sep. 28, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,155,454. The entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1585934 | Muir | May 1926 | A |
1666332 | Hirsch | Apr 1928 | A |
1831786 | Duncan | Nov 1931 | A |
2708437 | Hutchins | May 1955 | A |
3297022 | Wallace | Jan 1967 | A |
3686706 | Finley | Aug 1972 | A |
3734099 | Bender et al. | May 1973 | A |
3791379 | Storz | Feb 1974 | A |
3812855 | Banko | May 1974 | A |
3835842 | Iglesias | Sep 1974 | A |
3850162 | Iglesias | Nov 1974 | A |
3945375 | Banko | Mar 1976 | A |
3980252 | Tae | Sep 1976 | A |
3995619 | Glatzer | Dec 1976 | A |
3996921 | Neuwirth | Dec 1976 | A |
4011869 | Seiler, Jr. | Mar 1977 | A |
4108182 | Hartman et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4146405 | Timmer et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4198958 | Utsugi | Apr 1980 | A |
4203444 | Bonnell et al. | May 1980 | A |
4210146 | Banko | Jul 1980 | A |
4246902 | Martinez | Jan 1981 | A |
4247180 | Norris | Jan 1981 | A |
4258721 | Parent et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4261346 | Wettermann | Apr 1981 | A |
4294234 | Matsuo | Oct 1981 | A |
4316465 | Dotson, Jr. | Feb 1982 | A |
4369768 | Vukovic | Jan 1983 | A |
4392485 | Hiltebrandt | Jul 1983 | A |
4414962 | Carson | Nov 1983 | A |
4449538 | Corbitt et al. | May 1984 | A |
4493698 | Wang et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4517977 | Frost | May 1985 | A |
4543965 | Pack et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4567880 | Goodman | Feb 1986 | A |
4589414 | Yoshida et al. | May 1986 | A |
4601284 | Arakawa et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4601290 | Effron et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4606330 | Bonnet | Aug 1986 | A |
4630598 | Bonnet | Dec 1986 | A |
4644952 | Patipa et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646722 | Silverstein | Mar 1987 | A |
4649919 | Thimsen et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4667656 | Yabe | May 1987 | A |
4700694 | Shishido | Oct 1987 | A |
4706656 | Kuboto | Nov 1987 | A |
4718291 | Wood et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4737142 | Heckele | Apr 1988 | A |
4749376 | Kensey et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756309 | Sachse et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4779130 | Yabe | Oct 1988 | A |
4819635 | Shapiro | Apr 1989 | A |
4844064 | Thimsen et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4850354 | McGurk-Burleson et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4856919 | Takeuchi et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4867157 | McGurk-Burleson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4924851 | Ognier et al. | May 1990 | A |
4940061 | Terwilliger et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950278 | Sachse et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955882 | Hakky | Sep 1990 | A |
4986827 | Akkas et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4998527 | Meyer | Mar 1991 | A |
4998914 | Wiest et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5007917 | Evans | Apr 1991 | A |
5027792 | Meyer | Jul 1991 | A |
5037386 | Marcus et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5105800 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5106364 | Hayafuji et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5112299 | Pascaloff | May 1992 | A |
5116868 | Chen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5125910 | Freitas | Jun 1992 | A |
5133713 | Huang et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5152744 | Krause et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158553 | Berry et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163433 | Kagawa et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5169397 | Sakashita et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176677 | Wuchinich | Jan 1993 | A |
5195541 | Obenchain | Mar 1993 | A |
5226910 | Kajiyama et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5244459 | Hill | Sep 1993 | A |
5254117 | Rigby et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5269785 | Bonutti | Dec 1993 | A |
5270622 | Krause | Dec 1993 | A |
5275609 | Pingleton et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5288290 | Brody | Feb 1994 | A |
5304118 | Trese et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312399 | Takky et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312425 | Evans et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312430 | Rosenbluth et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320091 | Grossi et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5347992 | Pearlman et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350390 | Sher | Sep 1994 | A |
5364395 | West, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374253 | Burns, Sr. et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5390585 | Ryuh | Feb 1995 | A |
5392765 | Muller | Feb 1995 | A |
5395313 | Naves et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403276 | Schechter et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5409013 | Clement | Apr 1995 | A |
5409453 | Lundquist et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411513 | Ireland et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421819 | Edwards et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425376 | Banys et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429601 | Conley et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435805 | Edwards et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443476 | Shapiro | Aug 1995 | A |
5449356 | Walbrink et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5456673 | Ziegler et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456689 | Kresch et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5483951 | Frassica et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490819 | Nicholas et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5490860 | Middle et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5492537 | Vancaillie | Feb 1996 | A |
5498258 | Hakky et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5527331 | Kresch et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5549541 | Muller | Aug 1996 | A |
5556378 | Storz et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563481 | Krause | Oct 1996 | A |
5569164 | Lurz | Oct 1996 | A |
5569254 | Carlson et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569284 | Young et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575756 | Karasawa et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591187 | Dekel | Jan 1997 | A |
5601583 | Donahue et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601603 | Illi | Feb 1997 | A |
5602449 | Krause et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603332 | O'Connor | Feb 1997 | A |
5630798 | Beiser et al. | May 1997 | A |
5649547 | Ritchart et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669927 | Boebel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672945 | Krause | Sep 1997 | A |
5674179 | Bonnet et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676497 | Kim | Oct 1997 | A |
5695448 | Kimura et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702420 | Sterling et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709698 | Adams et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5730752 | Alden et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733298 | Berman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741286 | Recuset | Apr 1998 | A |
5741287 | Alden et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749885 | Sjostrom et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749889 | Bacich et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759185 | Grinberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5772634 | Atkinson | Jun 1998 | A |
5775333 | Burbank et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782849 | Miller | Jul 1998 | A |
5807240 | Muller et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807282 | Fowler | Sep 1998 | A |
5810770 | Chin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810861 | Gaber | Sep 1998 | A |
5814009 | Wheatman | Sep 1998 | A |
5833643 | Ross et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840060 | Beiser et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5857995 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5873886 | Larsen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5899915 | Saadat | May 1999 | A |
5911699 | Anis et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911722 | Adler et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913867 | Dion | Jun 1999 | A |
5916229 | Evans | Jun 1999 | A |
5925055 | Adrian et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928163 | Roberts et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944668 | Vancaillie et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947990 | Smith | Sep 1999 | A |
5951490 | Fowler | Sep 1999 | A |
5956130 | Vancaillie et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957832 | Taylor et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6001116 | Heisler et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004320 | Casscells et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007513 | Anis et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6024751 | Lovato et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032673 | Savage et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039748 | Savage et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042552 | Cornier | Mar 2000 | A |
6068641 | Varsseveld | May 2000 | A |
6086542 | Glowa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090094 | Clifford, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090123 | Culp et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113594 | Savage | Sep 2000 | A |
6119973 | Galloway | Sep 2000 | A |
6120147 | Vijfvinkel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120462 | Hibner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132448 | Perez et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149633 | Maaskamp | Nov 2000 | A |
6156049 | Lovato et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159160 | Hsei et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159209 | Hakky | Dec 2000 | A |
6203518 | Anis et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217543 | Anis et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224603 | Marino | May 2001 | B1 |
6244228 | Kuhn et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258111 | Ross et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277096 | Cortella et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6315714 | Akiba | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6358200 | Grossi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358263 | Mark et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6359200 | Day | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6402701 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428486 | Ritchart et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6443947 | Marko | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471639 | Rudischhauser et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6494892 | Ireland et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6585708 | Maaskamp | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610066 | Dinger et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626827 | Felix et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632182 | Treat | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6656132 | Ouchi | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6712773 | Viola | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6824544 | Boebel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837847 | Ewers et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7025720 | Boebel et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025732 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7150713 | Shener et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7226459 | Cesarini et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249602 | Emanuel | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7510563 | Cesarini et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7763033 | Gruber et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7922737 | Cesarini et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8061359 | Emanuel | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062214 | Shener et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8419626 | Shener-Irmakoglu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8663264 | Cesarini et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678999 | Isaacson | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8852085 | Shener-Irmakoglu et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8893722 | Emanuel | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8932208 | Kendale et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8951274 | Adams et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9060800 | Cesarini et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9060801 | Cesarini et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9066745 | Cesarini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9072431 | Adams et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9089358 | Emanuel | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9125550 | Shener-Irmakoglu et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9155454 | Sahney et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
10251539 | Sahney et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
20010039370 | Takahashi | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039963 | Spear et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047183 | Privitera et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020058859 | Brommersma | May 2002 | A1 |
20020165427 | Yachia et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030050603 | Todd | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050638 | Yachia et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078609 | Finlay et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114875 | Sjostrom | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040204671 | Stubbs et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220452 | Shalman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050043690 | Todd | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085692 | Kiehn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050234298 | Kucklick | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060036132 | Renner et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047185 | Shener | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060241586 | Wilk | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070073101 | Queyroux et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080015621 | Emanuel | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045859 | Fritsch | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058588 | Emanuel | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058842 | Emanuel | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097468 | Adams et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097469 | Gruber et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097470 | Gruber et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097471 | Adams et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080135053 | Gruber et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146872 | Gruber et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146873 | Adams et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080245371 | Gruber | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249366 | Gruber et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249534 | Gruber et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249553 | Gruber et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262308 | Prestezog et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090012362 | Kucklick | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082628 | Kucklick et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090270812 | Litscher et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270895 | Churchill et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270896 | Sullivan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270897 | Adams et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270898 | Chin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100087798 | Adams et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152647 | Shener et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110166419 | Reif et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120078038 | Sahney et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130131452 | Kuroda et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140031834 | Germain et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1695546 | Nov 2005 | CN |
101662993 | Mar 2010 | CN |
3206381 | Sep 1983 | DE |
3339322 | May 1984 | DE |
3601453 | Sep 1986 | DE |
3615694 | Nov 1987 | DE |
4038398 | Jun 1992 | DE |
4440035 | May 1996 | DE |
19633124 | May 1997 | DE |
19751632 | Sep 1999 | DE |
102006022827 | Dec 2006 | DE |
0310285 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0327410 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0557044 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0582295 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0606531 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0621008 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0806183 | Nov 1997 | EP |
1681022 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2093353 | Sep 1982 | GB |
2311468 | Oct 1997 | GB |
2001075416 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002529185 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002538889 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003245247 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2005319086 | Nov 2005 | JP |
1006944 | Mar 1999 | NL |
8101648 | Jun 1981 | WO |
20198101648 | Jun 1981 | WO |
9211816 | Jul 1992 | WO |
9307821 | Apr 1993 | WO |
20199307821 | Apr 1993 | WO |
9315664 | Aug 1993 | WO |
20199315664 | Aug 1993 | WO |
9426181 | Nov 1994 | WO |
20199426181 | Nov 1994 | WO |
9505777 | Mar 1995 | WO |
20199505777 | Mar 1995 | WO |
9510981 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9510982 | Apr 1995 | WO |
20199510981 | Apr 1995 | WO |
20199510982 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9522935 | Aug 1995 | WO |
20199522935 | Aug 1995 | WO |
9530377 | Nov 1995 | WO |
20199530377 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9611638 | Apr 1996 | WO |
20199611638 | Apr 1996 | WO |
9626676 | Sep 1996 | WO |
20199626676 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9709922 | Mar 1997 | WO |
20199709922 | Mar 1997 | WO |
9717027 | May 1997 | WO |
20199717027 | May 1997 | WO |
9719642 | Jun 1997 | WO |
20199719642 | Jun 1997 | WO |
9724071 | Jul 1997 | WO |
20199724071 | Jul 1997 | WO |
9734534 | Sep 1997 | WO |
20199734534 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9735522 | Oct 1997 | WO |
20199735522 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9809569 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9810707 | Mar 1998 | WO |
20199809569 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9846147 | Oct 1998 | WO |
20199846147 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9903407 | Jan 1999 | WO |
9903409 | Jan 1999 | WO |
20199903407 | Jan 1999 | WO |
20199903409 | Jan 1999 | WO |
9907295 | Feb 1999 | WO |
20199907295 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9911184 | Mar 1999 | WO |
20199911184 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9939648 | Aug 1999 | WO |
20199939648 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9944506 | Sep 1999 | WO |
20199944506 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9960935 | Dec 1999 | WO |
20199960935 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0012010 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0028890 | May 2000 | WO |
0033743 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0044295 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0047116 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0057797 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0135831 | May 2001 | WO |
0158368 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0195810 | Dec 2001 | WO |
02069808 | Sep 2002 | WO |
03022164 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03077767 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2005060842 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005096963 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2006105283 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006121968 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006121970 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007044833 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2012044705 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Jul. 24, 2012 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359 (1050 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Oct. 19, 2012 Request for Reconsideration of Certain Decisions Regarding Third Party Requestor's Request for Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359 (19 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Oct. 29, 2014 Comments on Second Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 27, 2014 (31 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Oct. 9, 2013 Comments on First Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 9, 2013 (25 pages). |
Reference AQ “Fishing Reel produced and sold by Shimano of Japan in to the U.S. prior to Oct. 26, 2001,” as cited in the IDS filed Oct. 17, 2005 in the prosecution file history of U.S. Appl. No. 09/983,810 (7 pages). |
Richard Wolf “‘Morce—Power 2306’ Electronic Morcellator” (2 pages). |
Richard Wolf “The Fluid Manager” (2 pages). |
Sheth, “Fiberoptic Light for Oophorectomy at Vaginal Hysterectomy”, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 119-122, 1998 (4 pages). |
Substantive Examination Report in the corresponding Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/003535, dated Aug. 20, 2015, 4 pages. |
Sugimoto “A Color Atlas of Hysteroscopy” Springer-Verlag Tokyo, 1999 (17 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/486,977, Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2005 (7 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/780,759, Applicant's Mar. 31, 2011 Response to Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2010 (15 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/780,759, Applicant's Oct. 25, 2010 Response to Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2010 (13 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/780,759, Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2011 (7 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/780,759, Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2010 (5 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/780,759, Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2010 (7 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,938, Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2011 (10 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,938, Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2010 (10 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,940, Advisory Action dated Sep. 10, 2010 (3 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,940, Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2009 (9 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,940, Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2010 (12 pages). |
Valle “Hysteroscopic Removal of Submucous Leiomyomas”, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 89-96, 1990 (9 pages). |
Weck “A Direct Path to Diagnostic and Operative Control: The Weck-Baggish Hysteroscopy System” Advertisement, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 7, No. 1, 1991 (2 pages). |
Williamson et al., Editorial 1 “Complications of hysteroscopic treatments of menorrhagia”, British Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 305-308, 1996 (4 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's May 5, 2015 Appeal Brief (47; pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Jun. 5, 2015 Respondent Brief (21 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Jul. 1, 2015 Corrected Appeal Brief (47 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Jul. 24, 2015 Resubmitted Respondent Brief (21 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Examiner's Answer dated Sep. 17, 2015 (3 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Oct. 19, 2015 Rebuttal Brief (25 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Apr. 24, 2015 Rebuttal Brief (8 pages). |
Notification on Results of Patentability Examination for Russian Application No. 2013119298/14(028553), dated Jan. 14, 2016, 8 pages, with English language translation. |
Notification of Second Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 201611020781.6 dated Jun. 1, 2018, 18 pages with English translation. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Appendices 14-28 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Claim Charts for VariousClaims in view of Various References (436 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Appendix 2 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Memorandum of Decision dated Apr. 21, 2011, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (14 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Appendix 6 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Opening Markman Brief of Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc. dated Oct. 13, 2010, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc., CivilAction No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (23 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Appendix 7 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Defendant Interlace Medical, Inc's Responsive Markman Brief (Redacted) dated Oct. 27, 2010, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (26 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Appendix 8 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Markman Brief dated Nov. 3, 2010, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. InterlaceMedical, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (8 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Examiner's Answer dated Mar. 25, 2015 (3 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Executed Expert Declaration of Hal Walbrink in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Executed Mar. 9, 2012 (42 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (37 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Litigation Search Report CRU 3999 dated Mar. 29, 2012 (24 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Order Granting Request for Reexamination dated Jun. 5, 2012 (29 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Apr. 14, 2014 Appeal Brief (334 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Feb. 13, 2014 Notice of Appeal (2 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Aug. 6, 2012 Response to First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (156 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Jun. 3, 2013 Response to Second Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2013 (37 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Oct. 21, 2013 Response to Action Closing Prosecution dated Sep. 19, 2013 (180 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Right of Appeal Notice mailed Jan. 14, 2014 (58 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Second Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2013 (56 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Dec. 19, 2012 Response to Notification of Defective Paper and Comments on First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (38 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Jul. 3, 2013 Comments on Second Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2013 (62 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Mar. 12, 2012 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459 (130 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Third Party's May 14, 2014 Respondent's Brief (303 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Nov. 20, 2013 Comments on Action Closing Prosecution mailed Sep. 19, 2013 (38 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Sep. 5, 2012 Comments on First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (210 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Appendix 19 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Opening Claim Construction Brief of Defendant Hologic, Inc., dated Feb. 24, 2012, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.,Civil ActionNo. 11-12064-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (24 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Appendix 20 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Opening Markman Brief of Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc., dated Feb. 24, 2012, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., CivilAction No. 11-12064-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (24 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Appendix 28 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Claim chart for anticipation of claims 1-8 based on U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,689 to Kresch (4 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Appendix 29 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Claim chart for anticipation of claims 1-8 based on U.S. Pat. No. 6,032,673 to Savage (13 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Appendix 30 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Claim chart for anticipation of claims 1-8 based on U.S. Pat. No. 3,945,375 to Banko (4 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Decision Denying Petition dated Sep. 28, 2012 (5 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Executed Expert Declaration of Dr. Henry A. Dominicis in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S Pat. No 8,061,359, Executed Apr. 1, 2012 (150 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Executed Expert Declaration of Hal Walbrink in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat No. 8,061,359, Executed Apr. 2, 2012 (22 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Litigation Search Report CRU 3999 dated Apr. 3, 2012 (33 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Order Denying Request for Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Jun. 4, 2012 (35 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, filed Apr. 2, 2012 (265 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,955, Request for Reconsideration of Third Party Requestor's Petition for Reexamination mailed Jul. 3, 2012 (32 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Executed Expert Declaration of Dr. Henry A. Dominicis in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Executed Jul. 24, 2012 (101 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, First Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 9, 2013 (34 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, First Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 (37 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Litigation Search Report CRU 3999 dated Aug. 13, 2012 (29 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Mar. 5, 2015 Notice of Appeal (2 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Jan. 22, 2013 Response to First Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 (379 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Mar. 24, 2014 Response to Second Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 (55 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Sep. 29, 2014 Response to Second Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 27, 2014 (12 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Sep. 9, 2013 Response to First Action Closing Prosecution dated Aug. 9, 2013 (159 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Reexam Order dated Sep. 19, 2012 (54 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Right of Appeal Notice mailed Feb. 4, 2015 (35 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Second Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 27, 2014 (35 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Second Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 (31 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Apr. 23, 2014 Comments on Second Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 (117 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Feb. 21, 2013 Comments on First Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 (771 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Jul. 24, 2012 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359 (1050 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Oct. 19, 2012 Request for Reconsideration of Certain Decisions Regarding Third Party Requestor's Request for Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359 (19 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Oct. 29, 2014 Comments on Second Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 27, 2014 (31 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Oct. 9, 2013 Comments on First Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 9, 2013 (25 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's May 5, 2015 Appeal Brief (47; pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Jun. 5, 2015 Respondent Brief (21 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Jul. 1, 2015 Corrected Appeal Brief (47 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Jul. 24, 2015 Resubmitted Respondent Brief (21 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Examiner's Answer dated Sep. 17, 2015 (3 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Oct. 19, 2015 Rebuttal Brief (25 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Apr. 24, 2015 Rebuttal Brief (8 pages). |
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180046921.6, dated Dec. 15, 2015, 3 pages, with English anguage translation. |
Emanuel et al., “Long-term Results of Hysteroscopic Myomectomy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding”, Obstetrics & Gynecoogy, vol. 93, No. 5, Part 1, pp. 743-748, 1999 (6 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,933, Action Closing Prosecution mailed Sep. 19, 2013 (41 pages). |
European examination report issued in corresponding EP application No. 11770261.3 dated Aug. 4, 2016. |
Notification of Reason for Refusal issued in corresponding Korean application No. 10-2013-7008294 dated Dec. 14, 2017. |
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180046921.6, dated Dec. 15, 2015, 3 pages, with English language translation. |
Inquiry Made in Course of Substantive Examination for Russian Patent Application No. 2013119298/14(028553) dated Sep. 29, 2015, 5 pages, with English language translation. |
ACMI Corporation, “Dolphin II Hysteroscopic Fluid Management Systems,” ACMI Corporation, 2002 (1 page). |
ACMI Corporation, “Dolphin II and DISTEN-U-FLO Fluid Management Systems for Hysteroscopy”, ACMI Corporation, 2002 (1 page). |
Bacsko “Uterine Surgery by Operative Hysteroscopy”, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 71, pp. 219-222, 1997 (4 pages). |
Baggish et al., “Diagnostic and Operative Hysterectomy,” Mosby, pp. 97-105, 123-125, 127-132, 353-355, and 394-398, 1999 (27 pages). |
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180046921.6, dated Dec. 23, 2014, 29 pages, with English language translation. |
C.R. Bard, Inc, “The HydroFlex HD System” (1 page). |
Cravello et al., “Hysteroscopic Resection of Fibroids: Results with a 6-Year Follow-up Period”, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 15, No. 1, 1-5 1999 (5 pages). |
Defendant Hologic Inc.'s Preliminary, Non-Binding List of Asserted Prior Art References, dated Feb. 8, 2012, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., Civil Action Nos. 11-12064-RWZ and 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District ofMassachusetts (7 pages). |
Dictionary definition of reciprocate, Merrian-Webster Dictionary, on-line edition, retrieved Mar. 20, 2013 (1 page). |
Dictionary definition of rotate, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, on-line edition, retrieved Mar. 20, 2013 (1 page). |
Dictionary definition of translate, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, on-line edition, retrieved Mar. 20, 2013 (1 page). |
Drews et al., “Surgical Approach to Myomas: Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy”, Seminars in Reproductive Endocrinology, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 367-377, 1992 (11 pages). |
Dumesic et al., “A New Approach to Hysteroscopic Cannulation of the Fallopian Tube”, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 7-9, 1991 (3 pages). |
Emanuel et al., “Long-term Results of Hysteroscopic Myomectomy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding”, Obstetrics & Gynecoogy, vol. 93, No. 5, Part I, pp. 743-748, 1999 (6 pages). |
European Patent Application No. 05 786 521.4-2305, Examination Report dated Apr. 21, 2010 (4 pages). |
European Patent Application No. 05 786 521.4-2305, Examination Report dated Sep. 26, 2012 (5 pages). |
European Patent Application No. 11 770 261.3-1657, Examination Report dated Feb. 11, 2014 (4 pages). |
Exhibit P to Hologic's Opposition to Smith & Nephew's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Redacted, filed Dec. 30, 2011, In Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-12064-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts(99 pages). |
First Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 213-531779 dated May 18, 2015, with English translation, 6 pages. |
Franchini et al., “Endometrial resection: a diagnostic tool in postmenopausal women”, Gynecological Endoscopy, 8, pp. 111-114, 1999 (5 pages). |
“From Distention to Deficit Monitoring Taking the All-In-One Approach”, W.O.M. World of Medicine (1 page). |
Gerber et al., “The Endoscapel: A new endoscopic instrument for supracervical hysterectomy and morcellation of masses; clinical evaluation”, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 86, p. S12, 1999 (1 page). |
Gynecare “Motor Drive Unit” Instructions for Use (3 pages). |
Gynecare X-Tract, “Tissue Morcellator”, Instructions for Use (3 pages). |
Gynecare, “Fluid Management System” Instructions for Use (26 pages). |
Gynescope Corporation “Laser Fiber Director”, Advertisement, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 6, No. 1, 1990 (2 pages). |
Hess et al., “Textbook of Bilio-Pancreatic Disease”, vol. III, PICCIN, e.g. Fig 6.5.1, pp. 1584-1586, 1997 (5 pages). |
Hologic's Opposition to Smith & Nephew's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Redacted, filed Dec. 30, 2011, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-12064-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (26 pages). |
“HysteRo-Purator 1143-1 Technical Data” WISAP (2 pages). |
International Application No. PCT/US2005/029807, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 28, 2007 (9 pages). |
International Application No. PCT/US2005/029807, International Search Report dated Jun. 13, 2006 (5 pages). |
International Application No. PCT/US2011/053753, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 2, 2013 (7 pages). |
International Application No. PCT/US2011/053753, International Search Report dated Dec. 20, 2011 (4 pages). |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-530014, Translation of Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2011 (10 pages). |
Karl Storz “Pilot a Course to Successful Outcomes”, Intermetro Industries Corporation, 2001 (2 pages). |
Karl Storz “Uterine Resectoscopes for Endometrial Ablation and Resection”, Advertisement, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 6, No. 1, 1990 (3 pages). |
Karl Storz, Advertisement, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 5, No. 4, 1989 (3 pages). |
Lin et al. “Clinical Applications of a New Fujinon Operating Fiberoptic Hysteroscope”, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 81-87, 1990 (7 pages). |
Mettler et al., “Pelviscopic uterine surgery” Surgical Endoscopy, 6, pp. 23-31, 1992 (9 pages). |
Neis et al., “Hysteroscopy: Textbook and Atlas”, Thieme Medical Publishers, pp. 91-103, 1994 (13 pages). |
Nisolle et al., “Endometrial ablation with the Nd-YAG laser in dysfunctional bleeding” Minimally Invasive Therapy, vol. 1, pp. 35-39, 1991 (5 pages). |
Olympus Product Catalogue: Part No. A2461—OP Nephroscope, Sep. 1991 (3 pages). |
Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201180046921.6, dated Aug. 4, 2015, 13 pages. |
Park et al., “Endoscopic Management of Uterine Myoma”, Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 583-588, 1999 (6 pages). |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2011308834 dated Jun. 11, 2015, 3 pages. |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Action Closing Prosecution mailed Sep. 19, 2013 (41 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Appendices 14-28 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Claim Charts for Various Claims in view of Various References (436 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Appendix 2 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Memorandum of Decision dated Apr. 21, 2011, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S.District Court for the District of Massachusetts (14 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Appendix 6 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Opening Markman Brief of Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc. dated Oct. 13, 2010, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc., CivilAction No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (23 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Appendix 7 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Defendant Interlace Medical, Inc's Responsive Markman Brief (Redacted) dated Oct. 27, 2010, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (26 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Appendix 8 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Markman Brief dated Nov. 3, 2010, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc.,Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (8 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Examiner's Answer dated Mar. 25, 2015 (3 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Executed Expert Declaration of Hal Walbrink in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Executed Mar. 9, 2012 (42 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (37 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Litigation Search Report CRU 3999 dated Mar. 29, 2012 (24 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Order Granting Request for Reexamination dated Jun. 5, 2012 (29 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Apr. 14, 2014 Appeal Brief (334 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Feb. 13, 2014 Notice of Appeal (2 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Aug. 6, 2012 Response to First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (156 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Jun. 3, 2013 Response to Second Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2013 (37 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Oct. 21, 2013 Response to Action Closing Prosecution dated Sep. 19, 2013 (180 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Right of Appeal Notice mailed Jan. 14, 2014 (58 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Second Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2013 (56 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Dec. 19, 2012 Response to Notification of Defective Paper and Comments on First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (38 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Jul. 3, 2013 Comments on Second Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2013 (62 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Mar. 12, 2012 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459 (130 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's May 14, 2014 Respondent's Brief (303 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Nov. 20, 2013 Comments on Action Closing Prosecution mailed Sep. 19, 2013 (38 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Sep. 5, 2012 Comments on First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (210 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Appendix 19 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Opening Claim Construction Brief of Defendant Hologic, Inc., dated Feb. 24, 2012, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., Civil ActionNo. 11-12064-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (24 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Appendix 20 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Opening Markman Brief of Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc., dated Feb. 24, 2012, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-12064-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (24 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Appendix 28 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Claim chart for anticipation of claims 1-8 based on U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,689 to Kresch (4 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Appendix 29 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Claim chart for anticipation of claims 1-8 based on U.S. Pat. No. 6,032,673 to Savage (13 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Appendix 30 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Claim chart for anticipation of claims 1-8 based on U.S. Pat. No. 3,945,375 to Banko (4 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Decision Denying Petition dated Sep. 28, 2012 (5 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Executed Expert Declaration of Dr. Henry A. Dominicis in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Executed Apr. 1, 2012 (150 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Executed Expert Declaration of Hal Walbrink in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Executed Apr. 2, 2012 (22 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Litigation Search Report CRU 3999 dated Apr. 3, 2012 (33 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Order Denying Request for Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Jun. 4, 2012 (35 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, filed Apr. 2, 2012 (265 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Request for Reconsideration of Third Party Requestor's Petition for Reexamination mailed Jul. 3, 2012 (32 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Executed Expert Declaration of Dr. Henry A. Dominicis in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Executed Jul. 24, 2012 (101 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, First Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 9, 2013 (34 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, First Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 (37 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Litigation Search Report CRU 3999 dated Aug. 13, 2012 (29 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Mar. 5, 2015 Notice of Appeal (2 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Jan. 22, 2013 Response to First Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 (379 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Mar. 24, 2014 Response to Second Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 (55 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Sep. 29, 2014 Response to Second Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 27, 2014 (12 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Sep. 9, 2013 Response to First Action Closing Prosecution dated Aug. 9, 2013 (159 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Reexam Order dated Sep. 19, 2012 (54 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Right of Appeal Notice mailed Feb. 4, 2015 (35 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Second Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 27, 2014 (35 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Second Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 (31 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Apr. 23, 2014 Comments on Second Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 (117 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Feb. 21, 2013 Comments on First Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 (771 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220133142 A1 | May 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16358848 | Mar 2019 | US |
Child | 17574759 | US | |
Parent | 14846198 | Sep 2015 | US |
Child | 16358848 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12892355 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 14846198 | US |