1. Field of the Disclosure
The embodiments described herein relate to a system for the prevention of the formation of ice and/or the removal of ice from an external surface of a vehicle, such as an aircraft, or another structure using an electro-active polymer (EAP).
2. Description of the Related Art
The formation of ice on an external surface of a vehicle or another structure can be problematic. As an example, the formation of ice on an external surface of an aircraft, such as the leading edge of a wing or a tail is less than desirable.
There are a number of systems that have been used in an attempt to remove ice from external surfaces, such the leading edges, of aircraft. One type of system is a deicing boot, which is a thick rubber membrane that is installed on the leading edges of a wing. When ice forms on the leading edges, a pneumatic system fills the deicing boot with compressed air, causing the deicing boot to expand and break up the ice. The airflow past the leading edges then removes the ice from the wings. Once the ice has been removed, the deicing boots are deflated until needed again. The rubber membrane may be subject to ultraviolet degradation. Deicing boots are not practical on transonic aircraft because of the potential leaks, limited durability, and variations in surface contour.
Another existing system used to remove ice from the leading edges of an aircraft is a heater system. This system uses heat to melt the ice from the leading edges of the aircraft. Heater systems use large amounts of energy, which limits ice protection to only the most critical areas. Another problem associated with conventional thermal systems is run-back ice, formed if the melted ice re-freezes on the aircraft.
Shakers or thumpers are other systems used to remove ice from the leading edges of an aircraft. Shakers and thumpers are only used intermittently and may have less than desired results in removing all of the ice accumulated on the leading edges of an aircraft.
The preceding described methods and systems for the prevention and/or removal of ice from an aircraft have less than desired results.
The present disclosure is directed to providing a system that consumes a low amount of energy to prevent and/or remove ice from external surfaces, such as leading edges, of an aircraft and potentially overcome some of the problems and disadvantages discussed above.
One embodiment of the present disclosure is a method of protecting an external surface from ice, the method comprising preventing the formation of ice on an external surface by oscillating at least a portion of a plurality of actuators on an electro-active polymer (EAP) surface. The method may include applying the EAP surface to an external surface. The method may include detecting that conditions exists that are conducive to the formation of ice on the external surface. The method may include sending a signal to a signal generator to oscillate at least a portion of the plurality of actuators based on detecting conditions conducive to the formation of ice. The external surface may be an external surface of an aircraft, such as the leading edge of the aircraft. The method may include oscillating each of the plurality of actuators at the same frequency to prevent the formation of ice. The plurality of actuators may be oscillated at frequencies on the order of about 1 Hz to more than 1 kHz. The actuators may be dimple actuators, bump actuators, and/or wrinkle actuators. The method may include individually oscillating a portion of the plurality of actuators to form a pattern on the external surface to prevent the formation of ice on the external surface. The method may include individually oscillating the plurality of actuators to form a wave on the external surface to prevent the formation of ice on the external surface.
The method may further include detecting the formation of ice on the external surface, sending a signal to a signal generator based on the detection of the formation of ice, and oscillating at least a portion of the actuators to remove the formation of ice from the external surface. The method may include oscillating each of the plurality of actuators at the same frequency to remove the formation of ice from the external surface. The method may include individually oscillating a portion of the plurality of actuators to form a pattern on the external surface to remove the formation of ice from the external surface. The method may include individually oscillating the plurality of actuators to form a wave on the external surface to remove the formation of ice from the external surface.
One embodiment of the present disclosure is an ice protection system for an external surface comprising an EAP surface having a plurality of actuators and a signal generator connected to the EAP surface. The signal generator may be adapted to individually oscillate the actuators. The EAP surface may be installed on an external surface of a vehicle, such as on a leading edge of the aircraft. The actuators may be dimple actuators, bump actuators, and/or wrinkle actuators. The signal generator may be adapted to oscillate the plurality of dimple actuators in a first mode to prevent the formation of ice on an external surface of the aircraft and to oscillate the plurality of dimple actuators in a second mode to remove ice formed on an external surface of an aircraft. The first mode of the signal generator may oscillate each of the actuators at the same frequency, may individually oscillate a portion of the actuators to form a pattern, and/or may oscillate the actuators to form a wave. The second mode of the signal generator may oscillate each of the actuators at the same frequency, may individually oscillate a portion of the actuators to form a pattern, and/or may oscillate the actuators to form a wave. The system may include a sensor adapted to detect the formation of ice on an external surface of an aircraft.
While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The present application involves the use of electro-active polymers (EAPs), which are a category of materials that are well-known in the art. The EAP surface comprises a compliant capacitor that includes an elastomer dielectric film sandwiched between two compliant electrodes. In operation, an electric field is applied to the compliant electrodes creating an electrostatic pressure, also referred to as Maxwell Stress, compressing the elastomer film. The compression of the elastomer film results in an elongation of the elastomer film because of incompressibility of the elastomer film. An application of an electric field between two oppositely charged electrodes causes a mechanical compression between the two electrodes. Likewise, an application of an electric field between two like charged electrodes causes a mechanical expansion between the two electrodes.
The EAP surface may be adapted to create a dimple or depression actuator in the elastomer film upon an application of an electric field to the electrodes. Depending on the configuration of the elastomer film and the electrodes, the elastomer film buckles, bends, or elongates upon the application of an electric field. The electric field may be applied from a signal generator. However, various means may be used to apply an electric field to the elastomer field as would be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. Clamps may secure the elastomer film in place and define the dimensions of the actuator. Because the periphery of the actuator is fixed, no in-plane movement of the elastomer film can occur. Thus, the mechanical force due to the electrostatic pressure causes an out-of-plane movement, such as a depression or dimple as shown in the actuator 50 of
Referring again to the embodiment shown in
The signal generator 30 is preferably adapted to individually control the oscillation of each actuator 20 on the EAP surfaces 10. The signal generator 30 may apply a time-varying current to actuate the actuators 20 of the EAP surface 10. The signal generator 30 may be adapted to actuate the actuators 20 in a first mode to prevent the accumulation of ice on the leading edges of the aircraft 100. The first mode may comprise applying an electrical pulse at a frequency on the order of 1 Hz to more than one 1 kHz. The electrical pulse may be used to oscillate the actuators 20 of the EAP surface 10. The first mode may be activated upon the detection of any atmospheric conditions likely to lead to the formation of ice upon the leading edges of the aircraft 100. The signal generator 30 may be adapted to actuate the actuators 20 in a second mode to remove ice from the EAP surface 10. The second mode may comprise oscillating the actuators 20 of the EAP surface 10 at a different frequency than the first mode or in a different geometrical pattern than the first mode, to break the bond between the ice and the leading edge of the aircraft 100.
The EAP surface 10 may include dimple actuators 50 (as shown in
As shown in
In a next step 220, the decision may be made to manually oscillate the actuators. If the decision is made to oscillate the actuators of the EAP surface, the actuators may be oscillated at step 230. The actuators may be oscillated under to control of a signal generator at various frequencies and in various patterns to prevent to formation of ice and/or remove the formation of ice from an external surface. The actuators may oscillate for a short period of time and the method may return to step 220. Optionally, the actuators may be turned off in step 270 and the method may return to step 220.
If the decision at step 220 is to not oscillate the actuators, the next step 240 is whether conditions conducive to the formation of ice are detected. In some embodiments, this detection step 240 is performed by a suitable environmental sensor, such as ice conditions sensor 70. When ice formation conditions are detected, in a next step 230, one or more actuators of the EAP surface are oscillated to prevent the formation of ice on the external surface. As described above, the actuators of the EAP surface can be oscillated under the control of a signal generator at various frequencies and in various patterns to prevent ice formation. The actuators may oscillate for a short period of time and the method may return to step 220. After oscillating the actuators at step 230, the actuators may optionally be turned off at step 270 and the process may return to step 220.
Although it is often desirable to prevent the formation of ice on the external surface, in some cases, ice may form despite the attempts to avoid it. In such cases, the method 200 may include a step 250, in which the formation of ice is detected by a suitable sensor, such as ice sensor 60. When ice is detected, in a next step 260, one or more actuators of the EAP surface are oscillated to remove the ice from the external surface. As described above, the actuators of the EAP surface can be oscillated under the control of a signal generator at various frequencies and in various patterns to remove ice form the external surface. The actuators may oscillate for a short period of time and the method may return to step 220. Optionally, the actuators may be turned off at step 270 after oscillating the actuators at step 260 and the process may return to step 220.
The method may include a next step to determine whether the ice prevention system has been turned off or remains on. If no formation of ice is detected and the system remains on at step 280, the method may return to step 220 to determine whether to manually oscillate the actuators. If no formation of ice is detected and the system has been turned off at step 280, then the method ends at step 290.
Although various embodiments have been shown and described, the present disclosure is not so limited and will be understood to include all such modifications and variations as would be apparent to one skilled in the art.