The present invention relates to improvements in ice skate blades, and more particularly to improvements in ice skate blade profiles which enhance skating performance.
In winter sports such as ice skating and hockey, the blades of an ice skate are the point of contact for all of the forces generated in turns, spins, jumps, etc. Known ice skate blade profiles typically have a convex shape along a length of the skate blade known as a rocker radius (often along with a second portion near each edge having a second radius or entry radius). Known ice skate blade profiles also have a concave (circular) profile across the bottom of the blade, and this profile defines two edges along the length of the blade. A skater can use either of these two edges in executing maneuvers on the ice surface.
Skate blades for different uses differ from one pair to another. Competing requirements for different applications has made the manufacture of skate blade profiles considered to be part art and part science. The operator of a machine which makes a blade profile is required to first dress the grinding wheel to have the desired contour and then ensure that during the grinding process a centerline of the profile on the wheel coincides with a centerline of the blade along its full length. If this is not done, then an irregular groove will be created along the length of the blade, with one edge being higher/lower than the other.
The dressing of the skate sharpening grinding wheel is traditionally carried out using a single point diamond dresser that is swung in a circular arc across the surface of the spinning grinding wheel about an axis perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the grinding wheel to give the wheel a convex surface with a radius of between ¼ inch and 2 inches. This technique creates the circular arc profile on the grinding wheel for grinding a complimentary concave profile across the width of the skate blade.
Limiting the blade profile to a circular, concave shape restricts a range between the maximum depth of the concave, circular profile, h, and the included angle, θ measured between the vertical side edge and a line formed generally tracking the concave profile near a bottom of the side edge. These two variables, h and θ, are interconnected by the following equation for the edges even condition:
r—is the radius of the circular arc in the bottom of the skate blade,
w—is the width of the skate blade,
h—is the maximum depth of the circular arc,
θ—is the edge angle between the vertical side edge of the skate blade and a tangent line formed tracking the circular arc at the bottom of the side edge.
h=r(1−cos {a sin [w/2r]}) (1)
θ=90°−a sin(w/2r) (2)
For a hockey skate blade, typically w=0.110 inches. Given this limitation on the width, and that the known profiles have a radius, a table can be developed with a list of corresponding r, h and θ values:
Smaller radii provide better turning ability along with slower glide speeds, while larger radii provide superior glide speeds along with poorer turning ability. However, with a circular blade profile, the range of edge angles, θ, and depths, h, is very limited. It would be desirable to provide an ice skate blade with profiles having greater variation.
Some alternative ice skate blade profiles are known. For example, Canadian Patent Publication 2,173,001 to Danese discloses an ice skate blade with multiple irregular angled edges along the bottom of the blade. Such an ice skate blade profile is impractical in that it will be very slow and provide poor turning ability. Canadian Patent Publication 1,179,696 to Redmond et al discloses various ice skate blade profiles many of which impractically have a center portion of the bottom extending below the side edges. Below is understood here to refer to the direction towards the ice when a skater is wearing a skate with an ice skate blade. Such ice skate blade profiles will be very unstable and provide questionable lateral control.
In accordance with a first aspect, an ice skate blade for an ice skate comprises a length adapted to be attached to the ice skate and an ice engaging surface adapted to contact ice, a profile extending along at least a portion of the length, the profile having a width between a first side edge and a second side edge. At least one of the side edges ends at a bottom end at the ice engaging surface, a vee is defined by one of the side edges and a flat meeting at the bottom end, wherein a first acute edge angle is formed between the one of the side edges and the flat, and a flat angle is formed between the one of the side edges and a bottom, wherein the bottom has a distance which extends from the flat to one of a second flat and a second one of the side edges.
From the foregoing disclosure and the following more detailed description of various preferred embodiments it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention presents a significant advance in the technology of ice skate blade profiles. Particularly significant in this regard is that the invention provides high quality ice skate blade profiles which can be suitably tailored for a wide variety of skating applications. Additional features and advantages of various preferred embodiments will be better understood in view of the detailed description provided below.
It should be understood that the appended drawings are not necessarily to scale, presenting a somewhat simplified representation of various preferred features illustrative of the basic principles of the invention. Certain features of the illustrated embodiments have been enlarged or distorted relative to others to improve visualization and clear understanding. In particular, thin features may be thickened, for example, for clarity of illustration. All references to direction and position, unless otherwise indicated, refer to the orientation illustrated in the drawing.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art, that is, to those who have knowledge or experience in this area of technology that many uses and design variations are possible for the improved ice skate blade profiles disclosed here. The following detailed discussion of various alternatives and preferred features and embodiments will illustrate the general principles of the invention with reference to the ice skate blade groove profiles particularly suited for skaters in hockey, figure skating, and speed skating. Other embodiments suitable for other applications will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art given the benefit of this disclosure.
Turning now to the drawings,
The width of the ice skate blade w is the distance between the two generally vertical side edges 41, 42 of the ice skate blade 101. The height under the blade h is the vertical distance (with vertical understood to be as shown in
As was noted in the background, the edge angle θ and the maximum height hmax under the blade 101 can advantageously be varied by relating the edge angle with the blade width, w, and the groove arc radius r. There are a few geometric properties that define the shape of the FBV ice skate blade profile; the blade width, w, the width of the bottom, d, and the depth of the bottom, h. The edge angle θ at the blade edge, in the case of a symmetrical (central to the blade width) location of the blade bottom 44 (as shown in
θ=a tan {(w−d)/2h} (3)
As can be seen from this formula; once a blade width, w, is known, a value of blade bottom width, d, can be chosen in conjunction with the depth of the flat, h, to obtain a wide range of desirable edge angle θ values. For example an ice skate blade 101 having a bottom width d of 0.090 inches can have a depth of flat h of 0.00075 inches. Testing of hockey ice skates with bottom vee profiles has shown that superior ice skating performance can be achieved using bottom vee designs with a width of 0.110″ and the bottom distanced ranges from 0.080″ to 0.105″, and the height is 0.001 to 0.0005″. It will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the bottom 44 does not have to be perfectly flat but only flat within the manufacturing and machining tolerances associated with crush roll forming tool, its abrasive coating, and the profile transfer processes associated with dressing the grinding wheel and grinding the ice skate blade according to the tooling and process discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/114,191 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
(2x/w)2+(y/h)2=1 (4)
Where: w is the width of the ice skate blade 801 and h is the maximum height of the profile under the skate blade or more precisely a vertical distance between a line tangent to the ellipse at the centerline and a line formed between the bottom ends 604, 605. The variables x and y are understood to be standard references with respect to the view in
There are however two practical considerations that must be addressed in grinding an elliptical profile 601 on the bottom of the ice skate blade, 101. These practical considerations are; first, the width, w, of all skate blades has a nominal value for each of the ice sports. In hockey, hockey goalie, figure skating, and speed skating, there is variation in tolerance for the blade width w within each sport classification. Also, an edge angle of 0° is not practical as it will have zero width at the blade side edge, with a resultant tendency for the edge to break off. In order to overcome these limitations in a practical manner, the x axis of the ellipse described above can be lowered by an amount d below the line joining the two blade bottom edges 604, 605, and the length of the elliptical axis along the x axis can be increased by an amount 2a. This ellipse will have the following equation:
{x/(w/2+a)}2+{y/(h+d)}2=1 (5)
Where all of the terms in the equation for the ellipse are defined as noted above. The blade bottom edges 604, 605, will be located at the coordinate points (w/2, d) and (−w/2, d). The edge angle θ can then be calculated as:
θ=90°+a tan [(h+d){[(w/2)/(w/2+a)]/[1−[(w/2)/(w/2+a)]2]1/2}] (6)
The edge angle θ is shown below to have a preferred range of about 62° to 87° for several combinations of a, d, h, with w=0.110 inches as is typical for hockey skates.
The fact that the height under the profile h, and the edge angle (θ), can be varied independently allows elliptical profiles, 601, to be selected that can provide superior performance over known circular arc profiles.
The embodiments discussed were chosen and described to provide the best illustration of the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to use the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally, and equitably entitled.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/114,191 filed on May 2, 2008.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12114191 | May 2008 | US |
Child | 12402838 | US |