The invention relates to a vessel as set forth in the introductory part to claim 1.
The vessel is for breaking ice drifting in a predominant direction relative to an off-shore installation such as eg a drilling vessel. The ice drifts with the current, but it is also influenced by the wind.
It is very important that off-shore installations in ice-filled waters are protected against the impacts of the ice. For instance, an oil or gas platform may be concerned.
In the following description, a drilling vessel will be used as an example of an off-shore installation. Upon impact, a drilling vessel must usually not be shifted more than about 2% of the depth of the water before the drilling operation has to be discontinued, and, if it is shifted more than about 5%, the drill pipe must usually be disconnected. It is therefore to be understood that impacts from ice, in particular in shallow waters, are extremely critical. Under no circumstances should large pieces of ice be allowed to hit the drilling vessel.
It is known within the prior art to use several, typically three, powerful icebreakers that cooperate (ice management) to ensure that large chunks of ice cannot drift towards the platform or that the ice is not capable of packing around it.
Pack ice and ridged ice are the types of ice that it takes the largest amount of energy to avoid. It is assumed that by means of conventional icebreakers it may be necessary with a machine power of upwards of 60-70 Megawatt, when the ice is thick and the current is heavy. That magnitude of machine power is comparable with nuclear-powered vessels, and in view of the fact that three vessels are often used, it will be understood that it is extremely resource-demanding and cost-intensive to secure a drilling vessel against the impacts of the ice.
The object of the invention is to provide a vessel which is considerably more resource-saving than the prior art.
The object is achieved by the opening through which the anchor line travels being located below (deeper than) the propeller shaft of the vessel.
By locating the opening through which the anchor line travels outwards below sea level, it is accomplished that the anchor line is not impacted by the ice, and hence the torquing on the vessel is avoided which might otherwise occur as a consequence of the ice influencing the anchor line.
According to the prior art one would, when one tethers a vessel to an anchor, secure the anchor line to the vessel at a large distance from the natural pivot point of the vessel. Thereby one hopes that the vessel will—due to the momentum created thereby between point of attachment and pivot point—seek to maintain a fixed orientation relative to the ice/current or wind that influences the vessel.
By positioning the opening in the vessel and there below, the anchor line is furthermore located in closer proximity to the natural pivot point of the vessel, and thereby it is accomplished that the above-referenced momentum is minimized whereby it becomes easier to freely select a suitable orientation of the vessel, while the latter—under the influence of the forces from the anchor—is moved through the ice, transversally to the direction of movement thereof and across the bed of the water under the influence of the ice.
According to an embodiment of the vessel, the opening through which the anchor line travels into the water is arranged—substantially—halfway between the midpoint of the vessel (ie the midpoint of the vessel in the longitudinal direction thereof, which is also designated the midship point) and the stern of the vessel.
Positioning of the opening in that place means that the vessel needs less fuel for manoeuvring, while simultaneously a sufficiently straightening momentum is maintained between the opening and the natural pivot point of the vessel.
In this embodiment, the vessel may thus be moved across a surface area of the water without the ice influencing the anchor line and without the need for inexpediently much energy for maintaining a course/orientation which is favourable for icebreaking.
In practice, the ice also changes direction, and often no one will know in advance which direction it will change into. Therefore, the vessel may be equipped to deploy two or more anchors. Thereby, the vessel may use to advantage the one or the other anchor line for icebreaking. Of course, according to such embodiment, the vessel may also use the pull from two or more anchor lines for icebreaking and, likewise, the anchor handling winches may—by suitable deployment of several anchors—be utilised as powering means for moving the vessel transversally to the direction of movement of the ice.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the vessel has two openings arranged below the water line, and both between the midship point of the vessel (which, as explained above is the centre of the vessel) and the stern.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the vessel has two openings arranged below the water line and both between the midship point of the vessel and the bow.
According to one embodiment, an icebreaking supply vessel with one or two azimuth propellers is used, ie propellers that can be rotated 360° about an essentially vertical axis. Usually, the vessel has lateral propellers, too, but they play a minor part compared to the azimuth propellers, in particular when it is the heel that is made to face towards the ice. Thereby the azimuth propellers may, on the one hand, grind the ice and, on the other, push the ice chunks away along with the propeller water.
When the heel is disposed against the ice, the anchor handling winch can be used to pull the vessel upwards against the movement of the ice to the effect that machine power is used only to grind the ice and to push the ice around the drilling vessel.
By using vessels according to the invention, a larger number of vessels can be anchored and operate quite closely to the drilling platform without an ensuring risk of them colliding. Thereby the water around the drilling vessel can be kept free of ice in a particularly efficient manner, and much money can be saved on ice-doublings of the drilling vessel.
Embodiments of the invention will be set forth in the dependent claims.
The invention also relates to a method as set forth in claim 18.
The text mentions the use of azimuth propellers; of course, they can also be other means providing motive force/thrusters/propellers known to the person skilled in the art.
By the phrase “expanse of the vessel” is intended the area comprised by:
The largest length and the largest width of the vessel are also designated: L.O.A.
The invention will now be explained in further detail with reference to a number of embodiments, reference being made to the drawing, wherein:
Icebreakers 2, 3 and 4 are in mutual communication with one another to obtain the most efficient icebreaking possible. However, this does not prevent the energy consumption onboard the three vessels to be high, see the explanation of this in the introduction. The invention entails a considerable reduction in the consumption of resources necessary for breaking the ice sufficiently.
The mere fact that the vessel 5 is still without active motive-power machinery will entail that the ice which is moving towards the drilling vessel 1 is broken. It will appear from the figure that the vessel turns the heel towards the ice, and by means of a pair of fixed propellers, it is easy to turn the vessel relative to the direction of movement of the ice (see below) and to thereby use to advantage the pressure exerted by the ice to shift the vessel 5 transversally of the direction of movement of the ice. In certain conditions, one single vessel operating in this manner suffices for protecting the drilling vessel 1.
According to one embodiment one (or more) icebreaking supply vessel(s) is (are) used that are provided with an azimuth propeller at both sides in the stern of the vessel. Those propellers that can be rotated 360° are particularly efficient for use in the exercise of the method according to the invention. When the anchor line holds the vessel up against the pressure of the ice, the propellers can be set in a transverse position to the effect that they both press the one side of the vessel towards the ice, the propeller close to the ice crushing it, while the other disposes of the ice with the propeller water.
The drilling vessel is still shown by 1, but now three icebreaking supply vessels 14, 15 and 16 are used that are anchored by means of respective anchor lines 17, 18 and 19, respectively. The figure also shows three large floes of ice 20, 21 and 22. The small chunks of ice are not shown. They were crushed by the six azimuth propellers of the three vessels to a size which is harmless for the drilling vessel 1.
The middle vessel is retained by its anchor line 18 and grinds ice off the ice floe 22 which is pushed away by the propeller water. The outermost vessels 14 and 16 also machine the ice floe 22 simultaneously with the floes 20 and 21 being pushed to each their side, around the drilling vessel 1. In this manner, the water around the drilling vessel can be kept free from ice to such degree that it is not necessary to ice-double the drilling vessel significantly. Thereby further economies can be obtained by the method according to the invention in addition to the great economies obtained on fuel and the ensuing reduction of pollution.
Of course, it is common that the direction of the current/the ice changes. It may therefore also be necessary to move anchors and vessels to continuously eliminate ice and/or render ice harmless around an off-shore installation. In order to monitor the movement of the ice, it is an option to deploy, in an area around the off-shore installation, one or more GPS apparatuses (loggers)—known per se—on the ice. Thus, by means of the GPS apparatuses, it is possible to monitor the movement of the ice around the off-shore installation and to obtain a (an early) warning of substantial changes to the direction of movement of the ice. Thereby it is also possible to issue a warning about and to implement movement of anchors in due time to the effect that it is possible to continuously render the ice harmless (or to keep the sea completely free from ice) around the off-shore installation.
The vessel comprises a bow (51) and a stern (52), both of which are configured with an icebreaking portion (54, 55). They are separated by and are situated above the most deeply situated part of the vessel which—in the embodiment shown, is the so-called flat bottom (53)—in the horizontal plane.
In the stern of the vessel, an internal passage (60) is shown which—in the embodiment shown—contains an anchor line 61. At the one end, the anchor line is wound around an anchor handling winch/wheel (62) and, at the other end, it is attached to an anchor (not shown). According to one embodiment of the invention, the opening through which the anchor line passes out into the water is located as far towards the stern as possible in the flat bottom of the vessel. As far towards the stern as possible usually means so far towards the stern that the opening is caused to be further up than the horizontal plane of the flat bottom.
This text uses the term anchor handling winch/wheel which is different from a conventional capstan in that it is usually designed for far greater forces than conventional capstans. Thus, an anchor handling winch may exert pulls of 600-1000 tons (corresponding to about 6,000,000-10,000,000 Newton) and have a braking power of 1,000-1,500 tons (corresponding to about 10,000,000-15,000,000 Newton).
The vessel comprises one or more thruster(s) (50) arranged in the stern of the vessel (52.) In the shown embodiment, the thruster is journalled rotatably about an axis (90). Of course, vessel and thruster(s) may also be made such that one or more thruster (s) is (are) not rotatable.
For the sake of stability as well as performance, the thrusters of the vessel are arranged such that the propellers are located above the horizontal plane of the flat bottom. It is realised by the invention that an anchor line can be conveyed out through that part of the bottom which is below the vessel's propellers (thrusters) without the line thereby coming into contact with the vessel's stern propellers (thrusters).
For the sake of good order, it should be mentioned initially that the vessel depicted in
To increase the performance of the stern propellers of an icebreaking vessel, they are, in a corresponding manner (as shown in
An actual icebreaking vessel can thus be made with “skeg” as shown in
Hereby it will be obvious to the person having skills within this art that a vessel with an icebreaking hull can be provided with a skeg. It is thus also possible to configure it with a passage for anchor line, wherein the opening conveying the anchor line into the water is arranged in “the skeg” and, more specifically, also to the rear thereof (towards the stern), as shown in
As will appear from
Other aspects of the invention are:
According to a first aspect of the invention, it is a method in the breaking of ice drifting with a predominant direction relative to an off-shore installation, characterized in that, by means of a vessel, an anchor is deployed in a position at a distance from the off-shore installation and in a direction with is, as seen from the off-shore installation, substantially in parallel with the direction of movement of the ice; and that the machinery of the vessel is used to adjust the direction of the anchor line.
According to a second aspect of the invention, it is a method like in the first embodiment, characterized in that a vessel is used, wherein the machinery comprises one or more azimuth propellers.
According to a third aspect of the invention, it is a method like in the first or the second aspect, characterized in that a vessel is used, wherein the machinery comprises side propellers.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention, it is a method like in the first to third aspects, characterized in that the machinery is used to adjust the direction of the vessel relative to the direction of the anchor line.
According to a fifth aspect of the invention, it is a method like in the first to fourth aspects, characterized in that the vessel is turned such that the heel is facing towards the ice.
According to a sixth aspect of the invention, it is a method like in the fifth aspect, characterized in that the anchor handling winch is used to pull the heel of the vessel upwards against the ice.
According to a seventh aspect of the invention, it is a method like in the first aspect, characterized in that several anchors are deployed in dissimilar directions relative to the off-shore installation.
According to an eighth aspect of the invention, it is a method like in the first to seventh aspects, wherein a number of GPS apparatuses are deployed on the ice, upstream of and at a distance from the off-shore installation, characterized in that information received from then GPS apparatuses are used to detect a change in the direction of movement of the ice; and that this information is used to decide whether one or more anchors are to be moved. Any of these aspects can be combined with the invention as set forth according to claim any of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2010 70136 | Mar 2010 | DK | national |
2010 70465 | Oct 2010 | DK | national |
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/DK2011/050104, having an international filing date of Mar. 31, 2011, which claims priority to Danish Patent Application No. PA 2010 70136, filed Mar. 31, 2010, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/319,474, filed Mar. 31, 2010, Danish Patent Application No. PA 2010 70465, filed Oct. 29, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/409,677, filed Nov. 3, 2010, the contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DK2011/050104 | 3/31/2011 | WO | 00 | 12/7/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/120527 | 10/6/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
704155 | Walters | Jul 1902 | A |
3656449 | Mead | Apr 1972 | A |
3837311 | Lea, Jr. | Sep 1974 | A |
3872814 | Rodriguez | Mar 1975 | A |
3881318 | Galloway | May 1975 | A |
3886882 | Thornburg et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3965835 | Bennett | Jun 1976 | A |
4215952 | Baardsen | Aug 1980 | A |
4547093 | Statham | Oct 1985 | A |
4596291 | Makinen et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4800831 | Hellmann et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4942837 | Hellmann et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5224800 | Mogridge | Jul 1993 | A |
5676083 | Korsgaard | Oct 1997 | A |
7681511 | Breivik et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8347801 | Denise | Jan 2013 | B2 |
9003987 | Saarinen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9056658 | Elmbo | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20030131777 | Fischer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20130087088 | Elmbo | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1232768 | Feb 1988 | CA |
2684772 | Nov 2008 | CA |
2924677 | Jun 2009 | FR |
2042568 | Aug 1995 | RU |
925752 | May 1982 | SU |
2007089152 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007136273 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008116964 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008140654 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009099337 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010103170 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/DK2011/50104, mailed Sep. 14, 2011. |
Written Opinion for PCT/DK2011/50104, mailed Sep. 14, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/DK2011/50104, mailed Oct. 2, 2012. |
Danish office action for PA 2010 70136, Completed Nov. 12, 2010. |
Danish office action for PA 2010 70154, Completed Nov. 8, 2011. |
Danish office action for PA 2010 70465, Completed Sep. 14, 2011. |
International Search Report for PCT/DK2011/050105, mailed Sep. 14, 2011. |
Written Opinion for PCT/DK2011/050105, mailed Sep. 14, 2011. |
International Type Search Report, mailed Sep. 30, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/DK2011/050105, mailed Oct. 2, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,772, mailed Jun. 19, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130074753 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61319474 | Mar 2010 | US | |
61409677 | Nov 2010 | US |