The transition to all digital content in collaborative settings and/or other organizational settings has become the preferred mechanism for project, task, and work flow management. Access to that shared content is needed for streamlined collaboration and sharing of digital content and documents. In such collaboration environments, multiple users share, access, and otherwise perform actions or tasks on content and files in shared workspaces.
In collaborative cloud-based environments, any number of updates may occur across the cloud-based platform at a given time. The updates may include any type of update, such as new files being created, modification of files by various collaborators, or even sharing permissions for a given file. When collaborators are continually accessing shared files, maintaining a local directory of those files may facilitate access to those files, however, local versions may not reflect the most recent updates to that file. As such, a collaborator may be required to access the shared filed via web-server and download the most recent version to see those updates. Still, if other collaborators are working on the shared file, the version is outdated and will not reflect the most recent version.
The following description and drawings are illustrative and are not to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or an embodiment in the present disclosure can be, but not necessarily are, references to the same embodiment; and, such references mean at least one of the embodiments.
Reference in this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.
The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms that are used to describe the disclosure are discussed below, or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner regarding the description of the disclosure. For convenience, certain terms may be highlighted, for example using italics and/or quotation marks. The use of highlighting has no influence on the scope and meaning of a term; the scope and meaning of a term is the same, in the same context, whether or not it is highlighted. It will be appreciated that same thing can be said in more than one way.
Consequently, alternative language and synonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, nor is any special significance to be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. Synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope and meaning of the disclosure or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the disclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.
Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples of instruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according to the embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note that titles or subtitles may be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control.
Embodiments of the present disclosure include systems and methods to automatically upgrade or update a synchronization client to a cloud-based platform. For example, the components of the present disclosure include a synchronization component, i.e., a Sync Executable Component and an Upgrade Component which may be implemented through the synchronization client to ensure locally accessed items are synchronized with the versions on the cloud-based platform as well as ensuring the correct version of the local synchronization client is being utilized.
The Sync Executable component can include instructions for performing methods to check for version updates, download the updates, store the updates in an appropriate source file location, and launch the Upgrade Component. The Upgrade Component can include instructions embodied on a computer readable medium for performing various method to upgrade the synchronization client, such as verifying certificates in the downloaded files, installing the downloaded updates in a destination file location, and restarting the synchronization process.
The synchronization client may be implemented in a cloud-based collaboration platform in which numerous collaborators are modifying work items which are accessed locally through the synchronization client. For example,
The client devices 102 (identified individually as client devices 102a-102f) can be any system and/or device, and/or any combination of devices/systems that is able to establish a connection, including wired, wireless, cellular connections with another device, a server and/or other systems such as host server 100 and/or notification server 110. Client devices 102 will typically include a display and/or other output functionalities to present information and data exchanged between the devices 102 and/or the host server 100 and/or notification server 110.
For example, the client devices 102 can include mobile, hand held or portable devices or non-portable devices and can be any of, but not limited to, a server desktop, a desktop computer, a computer cluster, or portable devices including, a notebook, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a palmtop computer, a mobile phone, a cell phone, a smart phone, a PDA, a Blackberry device, a Treo, a handheld tablet (e.g. an iPad, a Galaxy, Xoom Tablet, etc.), a tablet PC, a thin-client, a hand held console, a hand held gaming device or console, an iPhone, and/or any other portable, mobile, hand held devices, etc. running on any platform or any operating system (e.g., Mac-based OS (OS X, iOS, etc.), Windows-based OS (Windows Mobile, Windows 7, etc.), Android, Blackberry OS, Embedded Linux platforms, Palm OS, Symbian platform. In one embodiment, the client devices 102, host server 100, and notification server 110 are coupled via a network 106. In some embodiments, the devices 102 and host server 100 may be directly connected to one another.
The input mechanism on client devices 102 can include touch screen keypad (including single touch, multi-touch, gesture sensing in 2D or 3D, etc.), a physical keypad, a mouse, a pointer, a track pad, motion detector (e.g., including 1-axis, 2-axis, 3-axis accelerometer, etc.), a light sensor, capacitance sensor, resistance sensor, temperature sensor, proximity sensor, a piezoelectric device, device orientation detector (e.g., electronic compass, tilt sensor, rotation sensor, gyroscope, accelerometer), or a combination or variation of the above.
Signals received or detected indicating user activity at client devices 102 through one or more of the above input mechanism, or others, can be used in the disclosed technology by various users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) for accessing, through network 106, a web-based collaboration environment or online collaboration platform (e.g., hosted by the host server 100 via a web server). Alternatively, as within the disclosed technology, collaborators may access the cloud-based platform via a locally installed client software program, which automatically synchronizes work items having shared access. Collaborators may utilize client devices 102 to access the collaboration environment through various network interfaces.
The cloud-based collaboration platform or environment hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access (e.g., view, edit, update, revise, comment, download, preview, tag, or otherwise manipulate, etc.). A work item can generally include any type of digital or electronic content that can be viewed or accessed via an electronic device (e.g., device 102). Work items and workspaces can be accessed through various operating systems, such as Mac and Windows.
In general, the collaboration platform allows multiple users or collaborators to access and collaborate efforts on work items stored in a distributed database, such as a in a cloud network. Each user can see, remotely, edits, revisions, comments, or annotations being made to specific work items through their own user devices. For example, a user can upload a document to a work space for other users to access (e.g., for viewing, editing, commenting, signing-off, or otherwise manipulating). The user can login to the online platform and upload the document (or any other type of work item) to an existing work space or to a new work space. The document can be shared with existing users or collaborators in a work space. Any edits to a shared item are then synchronized on the cloud-database and reflected to each user capable of accessing that shared item.
In order to maintain a current contents of the aforementioned items on the cloud-based collaboration environment, a synchronization client is often installed on end-user device in order to maintain the most recent version of shared work items. Accordingly, any edits made locally to the shared item are automatically synchronized with the cloud-based platform, which may be accessed by various other end-user devices access those files locally through a synchronization client and/or directly via the cloud-based platform service provider (e.g., host).
Similar to most client applications, synchronization clients also require updating, or upgrades in order to, e.g., provide additional storage capacity or streamline the file sharing across the cloud-based platform on which the items are accessed, etc. The disclosed systems and methods allow for automatic updating and upgrading of the synchronization client to a cloud-based platform without user interaction and in a silent and secure implementation.
Referring to
In step 302, the Sync process checks the cloud-based platform for current version with a version checker component.
In step 304, if a new version exists, the Sync downloads the new version update archive via SSL.
In step 306, the Sync process verifies the archive hash.
In step 308, the new binaries are unpacked from the downloaded update archive to Source location.
In step 310, the Sync process launches the Upgrade Component and provides the Source path, Destination path, pid of the Sync process (for later re-launch).
In step 312, the Sync process ends.
On a Mac platform, for example, os.fork can be used to generate a new detached child process to run the Upgrade Component.
On a Windows platform, various install options exist for implementation. For example, in one embodiment, the components can be installed to Program Files rather than Appdata\Local on Windows. In order to enable silent updates in Program Files, only processes with appropriate privileges are launched. In another embodiment, the implementation includes a Windows service running with elevated privileges to proxy any upgrades.
A concern presented by installing into Program Files is that particular file location requires elevated privileges in order to write into it. The disclosed Update Component should be implemented on a Windows service that runs continuously with elevated privileges. So, in such an embodiment, the Windows service can install into Program Files on behalf of the Sync Executable component.
A concern presented by installing into Appdata\Local is that enterprise information technology (IT) groups typically do not prefer applications to be installed in any location other than Program Files. There may be deployment issues when installing into specific user contexts. However, with Appdata\Local a special Windows service to install on behalf of the disclosed components for auto upgrades is not needed.
The process implemented by the disclosed methods can pass the Upgrade Windows Service to the Upgrade Component along with any additional information requests, i.e., arguments, for the Upgrade Component (e.g., source, destination, pid). Communication to this ‘root’ service can be over insecure IPC because the process is a user process. In some embodiments, in order to ensure security, the Upgrade Component can both lock the source executable and verify its certificate.
The Upgrade Windows Service can be added and started during the initial install of the synchronization client to the cloud-based platform. In general, the synchronization client can be also updatable during a typical upgrade process.
Referring to
In step 402, of
In step 404, the Upgrade process can lock the source files of the downloaded executable in order to ensure that no interrupts occur during the installation process.
In step 406, the Upgrade process verifies certificate(s) of the executables ensure a secure install.
In step 408, the new binaries, or contents from the source directory are installed on the client device.
In step 410, the Upgrade process can unlock the source directly files and also clean up the files associated with the synchronization client to remove any unnecessary files and/or folders.
In step 412, the Upgrade process can re-launch the Sync process to check for new versions on the cloud-based platform.
In step 414, the Upgrade process ends.
The following embodiments provide an exemplary implementation of the Upgrade Component method. In general, the disclosed methods can be implemented in a shared script, such as Python. For example, the basic upgrade process and error handling may be performed in Python script-based processes. To perform OS-specific processes, there can be separate OS-specific delegate implementations which inherit from a base class. The base class can define, for example, an interface to be used within the upgrade script.
In some embodiments, certain processes or functions, such as the below-stated delegate.confirm_parent_process_is_dead( ), can be shared between different operating systems, e.g., Mac and Windows. However, certain processes or functions can be OS-specific, such as delegate.install_contents_into_destination( ). As mentioned previously, the particular destination location in which the Upgrade Component is installed may differ by platform and associated privileges.
An example of the upgrade script is outlined as follows:
In certain embodiments, the Upgrade Component process can differ in implementations of file locking, certificate verification, and placement/storage of files, based on the different platforms, or operating systems, where it is being installed and executed, e.g., Mac or Windows.
On a Mac platform, the downloaded archive file is formatted in a .dmg format which appears on the desktop of the user interface. The .dmg files are generally read-only. The .dmg archive can be mounted at a random location and verification can be performed in this mounted directory. The binary (*.app) can then be copied from this mounted directory to the install location immediately after verification. The fact that the mounted .dmg is read-only is sufficient security to verify signatures and copy the verified bits to install destination location just prior to launching the new bits.
On Windows platforms, a process with elevated privileges is used to run the disclosed Upgrade Component. To implement security, the verification and execution of the .msi file can be made atomic to any non-root process. In one embodiment, this can be achieved by locking the .msi before verification and execution.
On a Windows platform, the kind of locking can be implemented in Python script, for example, by calling the CreateFile command. An exemplary call command for CreateFile can be implemented in the following method:
The aforementioned method includes options to open the .msi with both read access and read share permissions using win32file.FILE_SHARE_READ.
Verification of certificates is understood by the Windows platform, so standard Windows APIs can be used in the verification process. Installation of the binaries (zipped program files) can be accomplished by running an .msi installer in silent mode. This will likely be the same .msi as a normal install. Using an .msi can take care of the transactional nature of installation and handles rollback on error. The .msi can be signed, which includes signing the installed binaries now located within the .msi.
The synchronization process is re-launched (e.g., step 412 in
In one embodiment, an alternative method can be utilized for updating instead of using an .msi. For example, in step the installation of the unpacked archive, includes a process of copying those unpacked files into the destination location. This is advantageous because the code in the Update process can be used cross-platform, e.g., on both Mac and Windows operating systems.
If an .msi is used, then the process is included with a standard Windows installation. The process may not be able to verify the certificates on the binaries inside the .msi. However, the Upgrade Component can sign the .msi and the certificate on the msiI can be verified as a whole.
The synchronization upgrade should only require administrative privileges for the first-time install. Automatic upgrades are implemented to not require admin rights. The synchronization upgrade process can also use a shim shell extension or finder injection that does not need to be updated, even if new features are added.
When an upgrade is available, the synchronization client can upgrade itself on a client device without a user's knowledge. For example, no finder and/or Internet engine (e.g., Explorer) restart are necessary, no visual indicators (e.g., icons should not blink), no re-scan of existing files, and no admin password entry are required. In general, a usually remains “signed in” to the synchronization client and all programs running at the time of an update. In one embodiment, the computer system tray icon or menu bar icon does not appear to remain “signed in” (e.g., selected or existing at all on tray/menu bar).
Feature updates can obey admin client settings, which can lock down enterprises to a specific version of the synchronization client. In some embodiments, minor version updates and security fixes do not need to obey this setting and those version updates and security fixes automatically upgrade on the client system.
In certain embodiments, specific versions can be upgraded to a subset of users. Such an embodiment is helpful in rolling out updates and to gradually provide them to all users while reducing the support load and issues (e.g., bugs) which arise and need to be fixed after an update is provided. In one embodiment, free users are provided the first roll out of new updates.
One embodiment of the present disclosure includes an automatic upgrade framework for a synchronization client which can be used across multiple platforms, or operating systems, i.e., MAC and Windows.
In an additional embodiment, the upgrade process can be fault tolerant. For example, if the download of the new executable file fails, or launching the new executable program file fails, the synchronization client does not fail and the user will not experience any client interrupts. This is because in these and other unanticipated error scenarios, the auto upgrade module is implemented to be fault tolerant by restoring the user to a functional synchronization client.
An example of the upgrade system can include, for example, a number of processes including a version checker, a downloader, and an installer. Each module is implemented at a certain stage in the upgrade process and is dependent on the prior module completing its task.
For example, the version checker is able to check if there is a newer version of the synchronization client available for the client system, or device. Since, in general, enterprises have the ability to set a maximum version to which their users can upgrade, the version checker can include an specific API call function to determine the allowable version of synchronization to which the user may upgrade. The API call function can use the username and/or authorization token on a client device and return, for example, a version number, a signature of a zipped binary (e.g., SH1 signature), and a download URL to the zipped executable program of the correct version.
The version checker then compares the current running version of the synchronization client to the version returned by the API call function to the host server and initiate a download if the version from the API call function is a newer version, e.g., greater than the currently installed version. In one embodiment, the version checker can execute at time intervals, such as every twenty-four hours, to check for a new and approved version.
In one embodiment, to prevent an infinite upgrade loop, the version checker can periodically check a file named launch_sync.<new_version> to determine a number of times an upgrade to the current <new_version> has been attempted. The installer can create the file in which it updates the number of attempts to upgrade to the <new_version>. If that number reaches a retry threshold limit, the version checker may not initiate the downloader (and, consequently, the installer), thus stopping any further upgrade to <new_version> until a newer version is released.
The downloader component can download the zipped executable to a temporary or source location and verify the signature (e.g., SH1) of zip, or archive program file in a secure sockets layer (SSL). The downloader component can also verify the archive hash of the zipped executable.
The installer component can be initiated once the download and signature verification is successful. For example, the processes can include the synchronization component's upgrade to generate a new process (e.g., a Python process) running an installation script. The installer can create (e.g., open an existing file) to a file named, for example, “launch_sync_<new_version>”. When this file is opened, the installer also updates the count of install attempts to <new_version>.
In step After the installation, the synchronization (Sync Executable,
If unzipping or copying fails, the installation script can copy the older version of synchronization back to the platform-specific directory, renaming it back to the prior version by removing the version number extension, and launching the synchronization component again.
If unzipping and copying the new executable succeeds, the installation script can launch the executable from the correct platform-specific directory. Upon launching successfully, the executable can send out a notification to the installation script stating that it launched correctly. This can likely be after the sync framework has launched successfully. Also, after the new executable has successfully launched, the installation script can then remove the files in temporary directory and can exit.
In some embodiments, if launching fails, the recovery plan to rename to older version of the synchronization client can be executed. A failure to launch can be remotely logged with sufficient information to diagnose the problem. In one embodiment, if a ‘successfully launched’ or similar notification is not received with in predetermined time period after the installation, e.g., a number of seconds, the installation can be deemed as a launch failure and the aforementioned recovery plan process may begin.
In an event that the installer itself needs to be patched and/or updated, a method can be implemented in the admin_client_settings API, or any other API which is utilized to determine a user's approved synchronization version. For example, admin_client_settings API can be called and can return a set of extra key value pairs that only the software developer can modify. One of the key value pair can include, for example, patch_installer=true/false.
Since admin_client_settings or other similar API can be called every few hours, it can obtain a key value pair instructing it to replace the installer. This can then trigger a download of a new installer script, which can replace the old installer script.
Ignored Items
Various of the disclosed embodiments include systems and methods for the management of file and folder synchronization in a cloud-based platform (e.g. Box). Some embodiments contemplate a system which synchronizes files and folders between a local machine and a cloud-based platform. In some instances, some objects should not be synchronized, e.g., should be ignored. These items (e.g., objects) may include, e.g., temporary or hidden files, folders, symbolic links, other special files or folders, etc. Certain embodiments contemplate systems and methods for identifying these ignored items and elegantly removing them from the synchronizing process.
Certain embodiments contemplate the ability to flag the appropriate items as “ignorable”. This flag may be a static definition in some embodiments. The flag may not be an end user feature allowing for ad hoc tagging of items as ignored, either locally or via the cloud-based platform. Neither is the tag used for files that fail to synchronize for some reason in some embodiments.
Based on the tag, these objects may be excluded from synchronization. This may be the case in both directions. For example, exclusion can be from the client device to the database, or storage system and from the storage system to the client device. The tag-based exclusion of these objects can prevent “ignored” local files from moving to the cloud-based platform and prevent “ignored” remote storage files from moving to local.
Some embodiments may handle transitions between “ignorable” and “syncable” states for a given object, effectively either creating or deleting the object in question. Some embodiments may provide the information necessary to support the synchronization operation. This may be achieved through “ignored item” notifications sent to all registered components, similar to notifications triggered by the SEQ.
In some embodiments, the following types of objects may be ignored for synchronization: Hidden (files only), System (files only), Temporary, Links (shortcuts, symbolic links, aliases, etc.), Web-based files (e.g. Box files), and similar file types.
In some embodiments, the implementation will normalize platform-specific behavior, defining a single notion of what is an ignorable item. For example, all files beginning with a ‘.’ (dot) may be treated as hidden files, regardless of the platform. If an item exists on the cloud-based platform that would be flagged as ignored were it to be pulled down locally, that item may be treated as “ignored”, and thus it will not be synchronized to the local system. For example, a cloud based platform/service file called “.Happy Days” may not be synchronized because files beginning with a ‘.’ are considered hidden, and thus they are ignored.
Some hidden or system folders may be synchronized (i.e. not flagged as “ignored,” “ignorable,” or “ignored item”). In alternative embodiments, only some hidden or system files may instead be marked “ignorable”.
In some embodiments, the synchronization is implemented in a File System (FS) adapter pipeline component for both local and cloud-based platform services. In general, raw_event may enter the File System adapter pipeline. File System attribute information may then be added to raw_event at the local pipeline only. The raw_event may flow through the filter pipeline as per normal operations, or the raw_events may be translated to synchronization events.
For example, a filter may tag “ignorable” synchronization events using a plurality of business rules. In some embodiments, the filter may perform various functions to synchronize events involving ignorable items. For example, the filter may provide a transition of ignorable→syncable may be rewritten as a CREATE, a transition of syncable→ignorable may be rewritten as a DELETE, and a transition of ignorable→ignorable event may be completely discarded.
The aforementioned process, and slight variations thereof, may exist in both the local and cloud-based platform. In some embodiments, the cloud-based platform service-side operation may exclusively be based on file naming conventions.
In some embodiments, the parameter Item State associated with an object will have a new property, e.g., syncability. In such an embodiment, the corresponding ItemSyncability enum data type may have values such as, SYNCABLE, IGNORABLE, and PROBLEMATIC.
An item whose item_state.syncability property has a value of IGNORABLE may indicate that this item is “ignorable”. This property and enum may be apart from the ItemSyncStatus enum data type and the notifications triggered by the IconManager, which also use the ItemSyncStatus enum data type.
Local FS Adapter
An extended API for the remote and/or local storage system software may include a function get_file_info_from_path( ). In some embodiments, the Mac and Windows version of this API will be extended to return all file attribute information pertaining to the Ignored Items feature. For example, in a Mac platform, this may include a ‘hidden’ attribute of kLSItemInfoIsInvisible or an ‘alias’ attribute of kLSItemInfoIsAliasFile. The attributes may be returned via the objc API in a Mac platform.
Similarly, in a Windows platform, a filter, such as LocalPopulateFileSystemStateFilter, can be utilized to pull the “hidden” and “system” attribute information determined by the objc API and subsequently to place it in the raw_event. The LocalPopulateFileSystemStateFilter filter may be based on an existing filter in the system.
A Tag Ignored Item Filter can set the item_state syncability property to “IGNORABLE” as appropriate. This may apply both to the naming convention rules and the attributes associated with the file.
An Ignored Item Rewrite Filter can perform a plurality of functions to compare the before and after states of a particular item. For example, in a syncable→syncable (technically: [syncable|no-state]→syncable) state, the filter performs no actions on items in this state. The events may simply be passed along. Similarly, in an ignorable→ignorable (technically: [ignorable|no-state]→ignorable) state, no action is performed on the item. However, a notification may be sent to all registered handlers that this item is being ignored. The event may then be discarded and may never reach the Sync Event Queue.
A transition state, such as ignorable→syncable can occur due to moves or edits to the item, such as when the file attributes changed. The event may be rewritten as a CREATE and passed along.
A transition state of syncable→ignorable can also occur due to moves or edits (e.g. file attributes changed). The event may be rewritten as a DELETE and passed along.
The item and its item_state parameter may be placed into the shadow, thus allowing this code to determine the aforementioned transitions during subsequent events that compare old and new states (e.g., item_state).
Cloud-Based Platform FS Adapter
The logic in the cloud-based platform (e.g., collaboration and/or storage, personal or enterprise) pipeline may be very similar to the local pipeline. Much, if not all, of the code in the filters may be shared with the local counterpart. For example, a Tag Ignored Item Filter may be a simplified version of the local filter. Only the file naming rules may be used to set the IGNORABLE flag. Additionally, an Ignored Item Rewrite Filter may be similar to its local filter counterpart and may perform analogous functions. For example, a syncable→syncable event may be passed along without further action. An ignorable→ignorable event may be discarded and a notification sent. An ignorable→syncable event may be rewritten as a CREATE. Finally, a syncable→ignorable event may be rewritten as a DELETE.
An alternate implementation may have Synchronization Events for “ignored” items flowing into the Synchronization Event Queue. This can leverage existing logic for getting an item's synchronization status into the IconManager or Iconizer. New logic for the Synchronization Executors may be included to drop various synchronization events for “ignored” items.
Further, in some embodiments, file system (FS) adapters and the filter or pipeline may normalize the stream of events coming from local or cloud-based platform (e.g., collaboration and/or storage, personal or enterprise) in order to filter out the noise, the platform specifics, etc. An atomic save transformation may happen in the pipeline, expansion of cloud-based platform raw_events into multiple sync_events may occur in the pipeline, etc. Handling ignorable files (hidden files, aliases, or web-based documents) in the file system adapters may be suitable given these considerations.
In some embodiments, platform-specific unit tests may be performed to verify that attributes are properly retrieved by the respective extended file system API's. For example, Item_state unit tests may verify that the new ‘syncability’ property is properly handled (copied, merged, etc). The unit tests may be implemented on the aforementioned filters or pipelines. Each of the new filters, both on the local side and on the cloud-based platform/service side (e.g., collaboration and/or storage, personal or enterprise), may have unit tests verifying their specific behavior.
In certain implementations, each of the filters or pipelines may have broader tests performed on them to verify behavior in some fundamental cases. For example, these cases can include: ignorable→syncable, syncable→ignorable, and ignorable→ignorable. The tests may verify proper results to ensure that the expected notifications are triggered.
On a Mac platform, a changing of the ‘hidden’ attribute (e.g., a command line of: chflags hidden <file-name>) does not trigger any watchdog events. In contrast, one may expect to see an “Edit” event. On a Windows platform an Edit event may be also generated. Various embodiments include adaptive techniques across the platforms, e.g. including OSx. In some embodiments, interoperability between ‘aliases’ and other linking on different platforms through symbolic links is provided.
In certain embodiments, cloud-based platform, or service events (e.g., collaboration and/or storage, personal or enterprise) may be expanded in some embodiments into multiple sync-events in order to transform an item from the old state to new state. In some embodiments, Ignore Filters may be placed subsequently, e.g., “after”, in the pipeline to accommodate transitions between ignored and syncable. For example, similar to an Ignored Item Rewrite Filter.
In some embodiments, folders that are hidden on the desktop are always synchronized. In addition, some embodiments may have the consequence that non-hidden files in a hidden folder will be synchronized.
In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or may be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine may operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.
The machine may be a server computer, a client computer, a personal computer (PC), a user device, a tablet PC, a laptop computer, a set-top box (STB), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, an iPhone, an iPad, a Blackberry, a processor, a telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a console, a hand-held console, a (hand-held) gaming device, a music player, any portable, mobile, hand-held device, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
While the machine-readable medium or machine-readable storage medium is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presently disclosed technique and innovation.
In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.
Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.
Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” As used herein, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” or any variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the teachings to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of these processes or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times. Further, any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations may employ differing values or ranges.
The teachings of the disclosure provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
Any patents and applications and other references noted, including any that may be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure.
These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes certain embodiments of the disclosure, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the teachings can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system may vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the subject matter disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the disclosure should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the disclosure with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the disclosure encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the disclosure under the claims.
While certain aspects of the disclosure are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the disclosure in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the disclosure is recited as a means-plus-function claim under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶6, other aspects may likewise be embodied as a means-plus-function claim, or in other forms, such as being embodied in a computer-readable medium. (Any claims intended to be treated under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶6 will begin with the words “means for”.) Accordingly, the applicant reserves the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the disclosure.
The present application claims priority benefit to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/822,170, entitled “Identification And Handling of Items To Be Ignored For Synchronization With A Cloud-Based Platform By A Synchronization Client,” filed on May 10, 2013, in the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
858619 | O'Farrell | Jul 1907 | A |
5043876 | Terry | Aug 1991 | A |
5742905 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748735 | Ganesan | May 1998 | A |
5774717 | Porcaro | Jun 1998 | A |
5787175 | Carter | Jul 1998 | A |
5799320 | Klug | Aug 1998 | A |
5848415 | Guck | Dec 1998 | A |
5864870 | Guck | Jan 1999 | A |
5926816 | Bauer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5999908 | Abelow | Dec 1999 | A |
6016467 | Newsted et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034621 | Kaufman | Mar 2000 | A |
6055543 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6073161 | DeBoskey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098078 | Gehani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6226618 | Downs et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233600 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260040 | Kauffman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279109 | Brundridge | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289345 | Yasue | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292803 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6336124 | Alam et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342906 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345386 | Delo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370543 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374260 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385606 | Inohara et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6396593 | Laverty et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6441641 | Pang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446091 | Noren | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449622 | LaRue et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6515681 | Knight | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539381 | Prasad et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6636872 | Heath et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636897 | Sherman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654737 | Nunez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662186 | Esquibel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687878 | Eintracht et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714968 | Prust | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735623 | Prust | May 2004 | B1 |
6742181 | Koike et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6947162 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952724 | Prust | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6996768 | Elo et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003667 | Slick et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010752 | Ly | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020697 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039806 | Friedman et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7069393 | Miyata et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080104 | Ring et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7130831 | Howard et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133834 | Abelow | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143136 | Drenan et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149787 | Mutalik et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152182 | Ji et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155483 | Friend et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7165107 | Pouyoul et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171468 | Yeung et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7178021 | Hanna et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7222078 | Abelow | May 2007 | B2 |
7233997 | Leveridge et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7275244 | Charles Bell et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7296025 | Kung et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310684 | Patrick et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7337193 | Mills et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7346778 | Guiter et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7353252 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7362868 | Madoukh et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363330 | Ellman et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7370269 | Prabhu et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7380120 | Garcia | May 2008 | B1 |
7386535 | Kalucha et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7401117 | Dan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7543000 | Castro et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7581221 | Lai et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7620565 | Abelow | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7650367 | Arruza | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653668 | Shelat | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7661088 | Burke | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665093 | Maybee et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676542 | Moser et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698363 | Dan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7734600 | Wise et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7735144 | Pravetz et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739411 | Messer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756843 | Palmer | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7774412 | Schnepel | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7814426 | Huesken et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7886287 | Davda | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7886295 | Burger et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890964 | Vogler-Ivashchanka et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7937663 | Parker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958353 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7958453 | Taing | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7996374 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8027976 | Ding et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
RE42904 | Stephens, Jr. | Nov 2011 | E |
8065739 | Bruening et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8090361 | Hagan | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103662 | Eagan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117261 | Briere et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126848 | Wagner | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140513 | Ghods et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8151183 | Chen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8185830 | Saha et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8200582 | Zhu | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8201230 | Day et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214747 | Yankovich et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8230348 | Peters et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8239918 | Cohen | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8326814 | Ghods et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8347276 | Schadow | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358701 | Chou et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8370803 | Holler et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8429540 | Yankovich et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8447820 | Gay | May 2013 | B1 |
8458128 | Khosravy et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8464161 | Giles et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8464167 | Saund et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473775 | Helmick et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8515902 | Savage | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527549 | Cidon | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8528087 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8549066 | Donahue et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8549511 | Seki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572022 | Hagan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8582777 | Urivskiy et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8583619 | Ghods et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8607306 | Bridge et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8650498 | Mihovilovic | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8713098 | Adya | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8719445 | Ko | May 2014 | B2 |
8719810 | Oh | May 2014 | B2 |
8745267 | Luecke et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8782637 | Khalid | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8819068 | Knote et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8825597 | Houston et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8832493 | Volvovski | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849955 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8868574 | Kiang et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8869235 | Qureshi et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8886925 | Qureshi et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8892679 | Destagnol et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8914856 | Velummylum et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8914900 | Smith et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918387 | Sokolov | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8949179 | Besen et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8949939 | Peddada | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8955103 | Kline, III et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8956103 | Gehring | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8959579 | Barton et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8966062 | Giese et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8990307 | Barreto et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8990955 | Hymel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9015248 | Barreto et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9054919 | Kiang et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9239846 | Besen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9244934 | Besen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9268655 | Chan et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9407664 | Banerjee | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9495434 | Walton et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9507795 | Dorman et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9535924 | Mackenzie et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9547658 | Fan et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9553758 | Mackenzie et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9558202 | Lockhart et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9563517 | Natanzon et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9575981 | Dorman et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9633037 | Smith et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9652741 | Goldberg et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9773051 | Smith | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20010027492 | Gupta | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020029218 | Bentley et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020091738 | Rohrabaugh et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099772 | Deshpande et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116544 | Barnard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133509 | Johnston et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147770 | Tang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194177 | Sherman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199024 | Givoly | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030041095 | Konda et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030073448 | Ozeki et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084306 | Abburi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093404 | Bader et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097374 | Himeno | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108052 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110264 | Whidby et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115326 | Verma et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135536 | Lyons | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135565 | Estrada | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154306 | Perry | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030204490 | Kasriel | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217171 | Von Stuermer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030228015 | Futa et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003104 | Boskovic et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021686 | Barberis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040076187 | Peled | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088647 | Miller et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098361 | Peng | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103147 | Flesher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111415 | Scardino et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117438 | Considine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122949 | Zmudzinski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128359 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162836 | Aronoff et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040177138 | Salle et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181579 | Huck et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196307 | Zak et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040201604 | Kraenzel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218214 | Kihara et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230624 | Frolund et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230652 | Estrada et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246532 | Inada | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260977 | Ji et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267825 | Novak et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267836 | Armangau et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005276 | Morgan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010860 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022175 | Sliger | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022229 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028006 | Leser et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033777 | Moraes et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038831 | Souder et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038997 | Kojima et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050073 | Demiroski et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050050228 | Perham et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055306 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063083 | Dart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097225 | Glatt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097434 | Storisteanu | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102328 | Ring et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108406 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114305 | Haynes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114378 | Elien et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138118 | Banatwala et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172284 | Dandekar | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182966 | Pham et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198299 | Beck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198452 | Watanabe | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223047 | Shah et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234864 | Shapiro | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234943 | Clarke | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261933 | Magnuson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060005163 | Huesken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026502 | Dutta | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026535 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036568 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041603 | Paterson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041752 | Tuvell et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047804 | Fredricksen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053088 | Ali et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070083 | Brunswig et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075071 | Gillette | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060117247 | Fite et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123062 | Bobbitt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133340 | Rybak et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168550 | Muller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173952 | Coyle | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174051 | Lordi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174054 | Matsuki | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179070 | George et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179309 | Cross et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060242204 | Karas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242206 | Brezak et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259524 | Horton | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265719 | Astl et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271510 | Harward et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288043 | Novak et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011469 | Allison et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016680 | Burd et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028291 | Brennan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038934 | Fellman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067349 | Jhaveri et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079242 | Jolley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100830 | Beedubail et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115845 | Hochwarth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118598 | Bedi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124460 | McMullen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124737 | Wensley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124781 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126635 | Houri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130143 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142039 | Bushnell et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157203 | Lim | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162610 | Un et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179993 | Arruza | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185885 | Tamura | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195779 | Judge et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198609 | Black et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208878 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214180 | Crawford | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220016 | Estrada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220590 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070240057 | Satterfield et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250762 | Mansfield | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256065 | Heishi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266304 | Fletcher et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282848 | Kiilerich et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283443 | McPherson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288290 | Motoyama et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005135 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005195 | Li | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016146 | Gan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021959 | Naghi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028323 | Rosen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040173 | Aleong et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040503 | Kleks et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040560 | Hall et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046828 | Bibliowicz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059474 | Lim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059656 | Saliba et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060080 | Lim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063210 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065881 | Dawson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077631 | Petri | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091763 | Devonshire et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091790 | Beck | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104277 | Tian | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114720 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133674 | Knauerhase et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140732 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147790 | Malaney et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151817 | Fitchett et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154873 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080182628 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183467 | Yuan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184130 | Tien et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080194239 | Hagan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195673 | Hamel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215883 | Fok et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222654 | Xu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243846 | Rasmussen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243855 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250333 | Reeves et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250348 | Alimpich et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263099 | Brady-Kalnay et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271095 | Shafton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276158 | Lim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281972 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294899 | Gazzetta et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306900 | Tamura | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090015864 | Hasegawa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019093 | Brodersen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019426 | Baeumer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030710 | Levine | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043848 | Kordun | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090044128 | Baumgarten et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049131 | Lyle et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090097374 | Shoji et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119322 | Mills et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125469 | McDonald et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132651 | Roger et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138808 | Moromisato et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150417 | Ghods et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158142 | Arthursson | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164438 | Delacruz | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171983 | Samji et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172201 | Carmel | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177754 | Brezina et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182989 | Rosenbluth | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193107 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193345 | Wensley et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198772 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210459 | Nair et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214115 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235167 | Boyer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235181 | Saliba et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235189 | Aybes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249224 | Davis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254589 | Nair et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260060 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265430 | Bechtel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271708 | Peters et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276660 | Griffith | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282212 | Peterson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282483 | Bennett | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300356 | Crandell | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300527 | Malcolm et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327358 | Lukiyanov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327405 | FitzGerald et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327961 | De Vorchik et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011292 | Marinkovich et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011447 | Jothimani | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017262 | Iyer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017619 | Errico | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036929 | Scherpa et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042720 | Stienhans et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057560 | Skudlark et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057785 | Khosravy et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076946 | Barker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082396 | Caldwell et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082534 | Sagar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082634 | Leban | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100083136 | Komine et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088150 | Mazhar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092126 | Kaliszek et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100093310 | Gbadegesin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107225 | Spencer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122184 | Vonog et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131868 | Chawla et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100151431 | Miller | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153835 | Xiong et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154025 | Esteve Balducci et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162365 | Del Real | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162374 | Nair | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179940 | Gilder et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185463 | Noland et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185932 | Coffman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191689 | Cortes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198783 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198871 | Stiegler et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198944 | Ho et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205392 | Schnapp et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205537 | Knighton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100212010 | Stringer | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218237 | Ferris et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223378 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100229085 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235526 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241611 | Zuber | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241972 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242028 | Weigert | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250120 | Waupotitsch et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257457 | De Goes | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262582 | Garcia-Ascanio et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262953 | Barboni et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267588 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269164 | Sosnosky et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274765 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274772 | Samuels | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281118 | Donahue et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100290623 | Banks et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293147 | Snow | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306379 | Ferris | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312615 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318893 | Matthews et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322252 | Suganthi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325155 | Skinner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325527 | Estrada et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325559 | Westerinen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325655 | Perez | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332401 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332818 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332962 | Hammer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333116 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001763 | Murakami | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016409 | Grosz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022559 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022812 | van der Linden et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029883 | Lussier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040812 | Phillips | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110041083 | Gabai et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047413 | McGill | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047484 | Mount et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052155 | Desmarais et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110054968 | Galaviz | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055299 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055721 | Jain et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061045 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061046 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110065082 | Gal et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066951 | Ward-Karet et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078243 | Carpenter et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083167 | Carpenter et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093567 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099006 | Sundararaman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099212 | Hahn et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107088 | Eng et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107205 | Chow et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113320 | Neff et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119313 | Sung et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125847 | Cocheu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131299 | Sardary | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137991 | Russell | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138479 | Jain et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142410 | Ishii | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145187 | Himmelsbach et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145282 | Moore et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145589 | Camenisch et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145744 | Haynes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154180 | Evanitsky et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161289 | Pei et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167125 | Achlioptas | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167353 | Grosz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167435 | Fang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185292 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202424 | Chun et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202599 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208958 | Stuedi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209064 | Jorgensen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213765 | Cui et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218964 | Hagan et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219419 | Reisman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225417 | Maharajh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238458 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238621 | Agrawal | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238759 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239135 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246294 | Robb et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246950 | Luna et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252071 | Cidon | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252312 | Lemonik et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252320 | Arrasvuori et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252339 | Lemonik et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258461 | Bates | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258561 | Ladouceur et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264621 | Burjoski | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276683 | Goldschlag et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277027 | Hayton et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282710 | Akkiraju et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289433 | Whalin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295798 | Shain | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110296022 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302571 | O'Farrell | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313803 | Friend et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314145 | Raleigh et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320197 | Conejero et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320936 | Mohan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120030187 | Marano et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057696 | Chew | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120064879 | Panei | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072436 | Pierre et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079095 | Evans et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089610 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089659 | Halevi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089710 | Rakowski et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120096521 | Peddada | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101995 | Agetsuma et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120108200 | Rubin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110005 | Kuo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110436 | Adler et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110443 | Lemonik et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117626 | Yates et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124306 | Abercrombie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124547 | Halbedel | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130900 | Tang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134491 | Liu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136936 | Quintuna | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143825 | Boehm et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120144283 | Hill et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150888 | Hyatt et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151265 | Bender et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151551 | Readshaw et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158908 | Luna et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159178 | Lin et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159310 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166516 | Simmons et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173612 | Vegesna-Venkata et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173625 | Berger | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179802 | Narasimhan | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179981 | Whalin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185355 | Kilroy | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185913 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192055 | Antebi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192086 | Ghods et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203670 | Piersol | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203908 | Beaty et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204032 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120206653 | Graves et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120207449 | Angquist et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209815 | Carson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209889 | Agnoli et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120214444 | McBride et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216242 | Uner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218885 | Abel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221789 | Felter | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224691 | Purohit | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226767 | Luna et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233155 | Gallmeier et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233205 | McDermott | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233543 | Vagell et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240061 | Hillenius et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240183 | Sinha | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120257249 | Natarajan | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259964 | Lin et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120263166 | Cho et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266203 | Elhadad et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120284290 | Keebler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284638 | Cutler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284664 | Zhao | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120291011 | Quine | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296790 | Robb | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309540 | Holme et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311157 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311499 | Dellinger et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317239 | Mulder et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317487 | Lieb et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120328259 | Seibert, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331177 | Jensen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331441 | Adamson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007245 | Malik et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007471 | Grab et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007894 | Dang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013560 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014023 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130042106 | Persaud et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054634 | Chakraborty et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055127 | Saito et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130067232 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073403 | Tuchman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073621 | Waddoups et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080765 | Mohanty | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080919 | Kiang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130110565 | Means, Jr. et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110961 | Jadhav | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117226 | Jain et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117337 | Dunham | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117376 | Filman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124458 | Barreto et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124638 | Barreto et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124984 | Kuspa | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138608 | Smith | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138615 | Gupta et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130151690 | Shah et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159411 | Bowen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163289 | Kim et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130167253 | Seleznev et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179947 | Kline, III et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185347 | Romano | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185452 | Burckart et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185558 | Seibert et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191339 | Haden et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198600 | Lockhart et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212067 | Piasecki et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212486 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218978 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219176 | Akella et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226876 | Gati et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227522 | Lerum et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130239049 | Perrodin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246901 | Massand | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246932 | Zaveri et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254699 | Bashir et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262210 | Savage et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262862 | Hartley | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268480 | Dorman | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268491 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268999 | Kiang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275398 | Dorman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275429 | York et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275509 | Micucci et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282658 | Besen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282830 | Besen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283106 | King et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304679 | Fleming et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304694 | Barreto et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304697 | Movida | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130305039 | Gauda | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325803 | Akirav et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130326344 | Masselle et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006357 | Davis et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006465 | Davis et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140007205 | Oikonomou | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013112 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019497 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019498 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032489 | Hebbar et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032616 | Nack | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033277 | Xiao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033291 | Liu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033324 | Kiang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040182 | Gilder | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040206 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047509 | Bhogal et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052939 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059002 | Lockhart et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059217 | Pizurica | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068589 | Barak | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074629 | Rathod | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082071 | Rexer | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140149461 | Wijayaratne et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140150023 | Gudorf et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156373 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172595 | Beddow et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172783 | Suzuki | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172799 | Dorman | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188798 | Mackenzie et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195485 | Dorman | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201138 | Dorman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201145 | Dorman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215303 | Grigorovitch et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140230011 | Drewry et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244600 | Schmidt | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140258350 | Duval et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280605 | Zhang | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140337291 | Dorman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140337482 | Houston et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140337491 | Barreto et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344456 | Buzbee et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359085 | Chen | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140359286 | Wen et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372376 | Smith et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379647 | Smith et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379760 | Martin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150019723 | Kweon et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039556 | Mackenzie et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150154156 | Meyers, Jr. et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186668 | Whaley | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150237406 | Ochoa et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160065672 | Savage et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160350326 | Simonetti | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170220596 | Smith et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180004831 | Smith | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180046644 | Benjamin et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2724521 | Nov 2009 | CA |
101997924 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102264063 | Nov 2011 | CN |
0348614 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0921661 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1349088 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1528746 | May 2005 | EP |
1933242 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2372574 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2610776 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2453924 | Apr 2009 | GB |
2471282 | Dec 2010 | GB |
09-101937 | Apr 1997 | JP |
11-025059 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2003273912 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004310272 | Nov 2004 | JP |
09-269925 | Oct 2007 | JP |
20020017444 | Mar 2002 | KR |
20040028036 | Apr 2004 | KR |
20050017674 | Feb 2005 | KR |
20060070306 | Jun 2006 | KR |
20060114871 | Nov 2006 | KR |
20070043353 | Apr 2007 | KR |
20070100477 | Oct 2007 | KR |
20100118836 | Nov 2010 | KR |
20110074096 | Jun 2011 | KR |
20110076831 | Jul 2011 | KR |
WO-0007104 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-2002019128 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-2004097681 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2006028850 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2007024438 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007035637 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007113573 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2008011142 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008076520 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2011109416 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO-2012167272 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO-2013009328 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013013217 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013041763 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013166520 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Exam Report for GB1410569.6 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jul. 11, 2014, 9 pages. |
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, Nov. 2004, 8 pages. |
Extended Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 25, 2014, 7 pages. |
Extended Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 26, 2014, 12pages. |
Search Report for EP 13189144.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Sep. 1, 2014, 9 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Sep. 26, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1415126.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 2, 2014, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1415314.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 7, 2014, 3 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1315232.7 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 9, 2014, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318789.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 30, 2014, 6 pages. |
Microsoft Windows XP Professional Product Documentation: How Inheritance Affects File and Folder Permissions, Apr. 11, 2014, 2 pages. |
“Average Conversion Time for a D60 RAW file?” http://www.dpreview.com, Jul. 22, 2002, 4 pages. |
“Conceptboard”, One-Step Solution for Online Collaboration, retrieved from websites http://conceptboard.com and https://www.youtube.com/user/ConceptboardApp?feature=watch, printed on Jun. 13, 2013, 9 pages. |
“How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” downloaded from the internet http://www.howtogeek.com, Apr. 23, 2013, 5 pages. |
“Microsoft Office SharePoint 2007 User Guide,” Feb. 16, 2010, pp. 1-48. |
“PaperPort Professional 14,” PC Mag. Com review, published Feb. 2012, Ziff Davis, Inc., 8 pages. |
“PaperPort,” Wikipedia article (old revision), published May 19, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
“Quickoffice Enhances Android Mobile office Application for Improved Productivity on latest Smartphone and Table Devices,” QuickOffice Press Release, Nov. 21, 2011, QuickOffice Inc., 2 pages. |
“QuickOffice,” Wikipedia Article (old revision), published May 9, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
“Revolving sync conflicts; frequently asked questions,” Microsoft Tech Support, Jul. 16, 2012, retrieved from the Internet: http://web.archive.org/web, 2 pages. |
“Troubleshoot sync problems,” Microsoft Tech Support: May 2, 2012, retrieved from the Internet, http://web. Archive.org/web, 3 pages. |
“Tulsa TechFest 2012—Agenda,” retrieved from the website, http://web.archive.org, Oct. 2, 2012, 2 pages. |
“Understanding Metadata,” National Information Standards Organization, NISO Press, 2004, 20 pages. |
Burns, “Developing Secure Mobile Applications for Android,” Oct. 2008, Version 1.0, 1-28 pages. |
Cisco, “FTP Load Balancing on ACE in Routed Mode Configuration Example,” DocWiki, Jun. 2011, 7 pages. |
Cohen, “Debating the Definition of Cloud Computing Platforms,” retrieved from the internet, http://forbes.com, Feb. 3, 2014, 7 pages. |
Comes, “MediaXchange User's Manual,” Version 1.15.15, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 1-90. |
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 24 pages. |
Delendik, “Evolving with Web Standards—The Story of PDF.JS,” retrieved from the internet, http://people.mozilla.org, Oct. 12, 2012, 36 pages. |
Delendik, “My PDF.js talk slides from Tulsa TechFest,” retrieved from the internet, http://twitter.com, Oct. 12, 2012, 2 pages. |
Duffy, “The Best File-Syncing Services,” pcmag.com, retrieved from the internet: http://www.pcmag.com, Sep. 28, 2012, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13158415.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jun. 4, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13168784.0, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 26, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jan. 28, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1300188.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 31, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1306011.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 18, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1308842.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Mar. 10, 2014, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1309209.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 30, 2013, 11 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1310666.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 30, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311417.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 23, 2013, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312095.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 12, 2013, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312264.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312874.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1313559.5, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Aug. 22, 2013, 19 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1314771.5, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 17, 2014, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316533.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 8, 2013, 9 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316971.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1317600.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 21, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318373.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 17, 2013, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318792.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 22, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1320902.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 20, 2013, 6 pages. |
Gedymin, “Cloud computing with an emphasis on Google App Engine,” Master Final Project, Sep. 2011, 146 pages. |
Google Docs, http://web. Archive.org/web/20100413105758/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_docs, Apr. 13, 2010, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/012973 dated Apr. 30, 2009, pp. 1-11. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/039126 dated Oct. 6, 2011, pp. 1-13. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/047530, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 22, 2013, pp.1-10. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/056472 dated Jun. 22, 2012, pp. 1-12. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/057938, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060875 dated Oct. 30, 2012, pp. 1-10. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/056955, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 1-11. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/063041, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/065617, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067126, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/070366, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Apr. 24, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020267, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated May 7, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/023889, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 24, 2013, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/029520, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034662, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated May 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034765, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jan. 20, 2014, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/035404, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 26, 2013, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/039782, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Aug. 28, 2013, 15 pages. |
Internet Forums, http://web.archive.org/web/20100528195550/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_forums, Wikipedia, May 30, 2010, pp. 1-20. |
John et al., “Always Sync Support Forums—View topic—Allway sync funny behavior,” Allway Sync Support Forum at http://sync-center.com, Mar. 28, 2011, XP055109680, 2 pages. |
Langfeld L. et al., “Microsoft SharePoint 2003 Unleashed,” Chapters 11 and 15, Jun. 2004, pp. 403-404, 557-561, 578-581. |
Lars, “35 Very Useful Online Tools for Improving your project Management and Team Collaboration,” Apr. 31, 2010, tripwiremagazine.com, pp. 1-32. |
Palmer, “Load Balancing FTP Servers,” BlogNav, Oct. 2008, 2 pages. |
Parr, “Google Docs Improves Commenting, Adds E-mail Notifications,” Apr. 16, 2011, mashable.com, pp. 1-6. |
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Feb. 27, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
Partial Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 8, 2014, 5 pages. |
Patent Court Document of Approved Judgment for GB0602349.3 and GB0623571.7; Mar. 3, 2009, 17 pages. |
Pyle et al., “How to enable Event logging for Offline Files (Client Side Caching) in Windows Vista,” Feb. 18, 2009, retrieved from the internet: http://blogs.technet.com, 3 pages. |
Rao, “Box Acquires Crocodoc to Add HTML5 Document Converter and Sleek Content Viewing Experience to Cloud Storage Platform,” retrieved from the internet, http://techcrunch.com, May 9, 2013, 8 pages. |
Search Report for EP13187217.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 8, 2014, 7 pages. |
Search Report for EP14151588.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
Search Report for EP14153783.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 3, 2014, 6 pages. |
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, 8 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report European Application No. EP 08 85 8563 dated Jun. 20, 2011 pp. 1-5. |
Tulloch et al., “Windows Vista Resource Kit,” Apr. 8, 2007, Microsoft Press, XP055113067, 6 pages. |
Walker, “PDF.js project meeting notes,” retrieved from the internet, http://groups.google.com, May 15, 2014, 1 page. |
Wayback, “Wayback machine,” Wayback, Jun. 1, 2011, 1 page. |
Wiki, http://web.archive.org/web/20100213004936/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki, Feb. 13, 2010, pp. 1-16. |
Yahoo! Groups, http://web.archive.org/web/20090320101529/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Groups, Wikipedia, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1-6. |
Exam Report for GB1317393.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311417.8 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311421.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316682.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 19, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312095.1 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 19, 2014, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1313559.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 4, 2014, 2 pages. |
User's Guide for Smart Board Software for Windows, published Dec. 2004, 90 pages. |
Zambonini et al., “Automated Measuring of Interaction with User Interfaces,” Published as WO2007113573 Oct. 2007, 19 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jan. 19, 2015, 6 pages. |
“Agilewords—How to Request Approval,” YouTube, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-Ov3DYNN3Q, Jan. 31, 2011, 2 pages. |
“Agilewords—Features, Powerful Features Yet Simple,” Jun. 1, 2011, http://web.archive.org/web/20110601223756/http://agilewords.com/product/features, 3 pages. |
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 42 pages. |
Exam Report for EP 13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 17, 2015, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312264.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jan. 30, 2015, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 10, 2015, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316685.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 17, 2015, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for EP 13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 13, 2015, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316532.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Mar. 27, 2015, 6 pages. |
Burney, “How to Move Document from Your Computer to Your iPad and Back Again,” May 31, 2011, 3 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311459.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 19, 2013, 6 pages. |
“Dropbox: Sync only specific folders,” posted on Feb. 9, 2012, available online at http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/20865/dropbox-sync-only-specific-folders/, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1220644.7 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 1, 2015, 4 pages. |
Invens, “Using and Troubleshooting Offline Files,” Jun. 23, 2002, Windows IT Pro, pp. 1-5. |
Invens, “Using and Troubleshooting Offline Files,” Jun. 23, 2002, Windows IT Pro, Figures 1 and 2, 2 pages. |
“How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” originally written on Jun. 1, 2010 and archived version retrieved from WaybackMachine as published online on Jul. 4, 2014 at http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/18285/sync-specific-folders-with-dropbox, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1413461.3; Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 21, 2015, 6 pages. |
Fu et al., “Efficient and Fine-Grained Sharing of Encrypted Files,” Quality of Service (IWQos), 2010 18th International Workshop on year 2010, pp. 1-2. |
Ivens, “Using and Troubleshooting Offline Files,” Jun. 23, 2002, Windows IT Pro, Figure 1. |
Ivens, “Configuring Offline Files,” Apr. 21, 2002, Windows IT Pro, pp. 1-5. |
Exam Report for GB1316532.9; Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 8, 2016, 3 pages. |
Cicnavi, “Offline Files in XP,” Nov. 29, 2010, UtilizeWindows, pp. 1-6. |
Kretzschmar et al., “Functional Components for a Security Manager within Future Inter-Cloud environments,” Copyright 2011 IEEE, 5 pages. |
Li et al., “CloudVO: Building a Secure Virtual Organization for Multiple Clouds Collaboration,” Copyright 2010 IEEE, 6 pages. |
Mont et al., “Risk Assessment and Decision Support for Security Policies and Related Enterprise Operational Processes,” Copyright 2011 IEEE, 4 pages. |
TaheriMonfared et al., “Monitoring Intrusions and Security Breaches in Highly Distributed Cloud Environments,” Copyright 2011 IEEE, 6 pages. |
Vimercati et al., “Managing and Accessing Data in the Cloud: Privacy Risks and Approaches,” Copyright 2012 CRiSIS, 9 pages. |
Wang et al., “Data Leakage Mitigation for Discretionary Access Control in Collaboration Clouds,” Copyright 2011 ACM, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150339113 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61822170 | May 2013 | US |