The invention will be described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Short peptides such as RIP do not have a fixed conformation in solution. However, the active conformation of RIP can be deduced from the corresponding sequence segment in RAP since RIP competes with RAP for binding to the same receptor. This suggests that RIP is structurally similar to a segment of RAP and that probably RAP acts as an agonist and RIP as an antagonist of RAP. The sequence of RIP (YSPWTNF) is similar to the sequence of residues 4-9 of RAP (YKPITN). Consequently, it is reasonable to assume that the structure of RIP is very similar to the corresponding segment in RAP, if not entirely identical. Therefore, it would be best to build a model of RIP based on the corresponding segment in the RAP structure. However, a crystal structure or a solution NMR structure of RAP is not available. Fortunately, there is another way to build a model of the active conformation of RIP. A crystal structure of a protein similar to RAP is available. This is the crystal structure of ribosomal protein L2 from Deinococcus radiodurans (PDB code 1 NKW). The structure of protein L2 from S. aureus is expected to be very similar to the structure of L2 from Dienococcus radiodurans because L2 is a highly conserved protein. A model of RIP was built based on the crystal structure of ribosomal protein L2 from Dienococcus radiodurans (PDB code 1 NKW). This homology-built model of RIP was subjected to energy minimization with program CNS (
Amino acid residues 1, 3, and 5 in RIP are entirely conserved, and in residues 2 and 4 the sequence differences are conservative, i.e. an arginine instead of a serine and a tyrosine instead of a tryptophan. RIP homologs with such conservative amino acid replacements in these positions are known to retain their inhibitory activity.
Screening for small molecule nonpeptide analogs of RIP was carried out by a computer search with the ISIS software (Integrated Scientific Information System) from Elsevier MDL against the Available Chemicals Database (ACD), a library of 300,000 commercially available small molecule compounds. The model of RIP served as the basis for the search. Our first approach was to carry out similarity searches with the RIP models against the ACD. As this search yielded only peptides it was abandoned. Next we turned to a search of the ACD based on a pharmacophore (
The basis for the pharmacophore design was the RIP model. The pharmacophore was defined in terms of distances in the RIP model between aromatic moieties, distances between aromatic moieties and hydrogen donors or acceptors and distances between pairs of hydrogen bond donors/acceptors. Different pharmacophores were used in the search for a suitable RIP analog.
To test if hamamelitannin is a quorum sensing inhibitor and thus suppresses RNAIII synthesis, 2×107 cells were incubated with increasing amounts (0-50 μg) of hamamelitannin (or RIP). RNAIII levels were measured as β-lactamase activity as a reporter gene product by the addition of nitrocefin as substrate. As shown in
To test for the effect of hamamelitannin on bacterial attachment in vitro, S. aureus cells were incubated with 0-50 μg hamamelitannin or RIP in polystyrene plates for 3 hrs at 37° C. Adherent bacteria were stained with methylene blue and OD determined at 595 nm. As shown in
To measure the amount of hamamelitannin necessary to prevent device-associated infections, bacteria (2×107 MRSA or MRSE) were pre-incubated with increasing amounts of hamamelitannin for 30 min at room temperature. Grafts were implanted and rats were challenged with the pre-incubated bacteria. Seven days later the graft was removed and bacterial load determined. As shown in
In the testing reflected in
To test if hamamelitannin could inhibit graft-associated infection, grafts (1 cm2 collagen coated Dacron) were soaked for 1 h in increasing hamamelitannin concentrations. The graft was then implanted into the animal, and bacteria injected onto the graft. Seven days later the graft was removed and bacteria on the graft counted. All rats included in the untreated control groups demonstrated evidence of graft infections, with quantitative culture results showing 7.0×106±1.7×106 CFU/ml MRSE and 6.8×107±1.5×107 CFU/ml MRSA. Significant (p<0.05) decrease in bacterial load was found when the grafts were presoaked with hamamelitannin (0-50 mg/L). As shown in
As shown, the analog identification method of the invention presents a powerful new tool for identifying agents for the treatment and prevention of virulent staphylococcal infections. RIP has been previously shown to act as a powerful agent suppressing virulence in staphylococcal infections, likely through suppression of normal responses to quorum sensing. Hamamelitannin exhibits similar inhibitory activity. Similar mechanisms may well be in play, in light of the inhibition of RNAIII production shown.
Hamamelitannin (2,5-di-O-galloyl-hamamelose) is an ester of hamamelose (2-hydroxymethyl-D-ribose) with two molecules of gallic acid (
Hamamelitannin is a natural product found in the bark and the leaves of Hamamelis virginiana (witch hazel), a deciduous shrub native to damp woods in eastern North America and Canada. The concentration of hamamelitannin in the bark and the leaves is 5 and less than 0.04% (w/w), respectively. Witch hazel extracts were used by Native Americans for pain relief, colds and fever, and they are currently used in skin care products and in dermatological treatment of sun burn, irritated skin, atopic eczema as well as to promote wound healing via anti-inflammatory effects. Hamamelitannin also was shown to inhibit tumor necrosis factor α-mediated endothelial cell death at concentrations less than 100 uM. Hamamelitannin, at a minimum concentration of 50 uM, was also found to have a high protective activity against cell damage induced by peroxides or UVB radiation. In addition, some antibacterial properties of witch hazel have been reported, where aqueous extracts of the bark or the leaves inhibited the growth of E. coli, S. aureus, B. subtilis and E. faecalis. In contrast, we have determined that hamamelitannin has no effect on bacterial growth in vitro even at concentrations as high as 2.5 mM per 1000 bacteria, 13,000 times the MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) of ampicillin to the same S. aureus strain (0.2 uM per 1000 bacteria).
Hamamelitannin and RIP inhibit RNAIII production at minimal doses of 0.2 and 0.5 picomoles per 1000 bacteria, respectively. Hamamelitannin and RIP also inhibit cell attachment in vitro, both at doses equal or greater than 0.4 picomoles per 1000 bacteria.
Hamamelitannin presents a non-peptide small molecule alternative to RIP as an excellent inhibitor of device-associated infections in vivo, in line with its inhibitory effect on RNAIII and cell attachment in vitro. Inhibition of infection is concentration dependent. Grafts pre-soaked with at least 30 mg/L (˜60 uM) hamamelitannin, show no signs of infection even though the animals were challenged with a high bacterial load of 2×107 CFU. These results are similar to those observed with RIP. Device-associated infections are prevented by merely soaking a graft in the hamamelitannin solutions, suggesting that hamamelitannin can be used to coat medical devices to prevent staphylococcal infections, including those caused by drug resistant strains MRSA and MRSE.
Although the present invention has been fully described in conjunction with several embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that various changes and modifications may be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications are to be understood as included within the scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims, unless specifically and expressly excluded thereby.
This application claims benefit of the filing date of provisional U.S. Patent Application 60/814,067, filed Jun. 16, 2006. The entire disclosure and contents of U.S. Ser. No. 60/814,067 are hereby incorporated by reference.
Work on the invention disclosed and claimed herein may have been supported in part by federal funds pursuant to contract NIH 5R21AI059061-02. To that extent, the federal government may enjoy rights in this invention and the patents that protect it.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60814067 | Jun 2006 | US |