The present invention generally relates to identification card manufacturing systems and, more particularly, to a diagnostic reports and supply ordering method for said systems.
Identification card manufacturing systems generally include a computer, at least one card manufacturing application running on the computer, and at least one identification card manufacturing device such as an identification card printer or laminator. In the case of an identification card printer, the card manufacturing application can combine textual and graphical information to form a print job corresponding to an image that is to be printed by the identification card printer. The print job can then be processed by the identification card printer by printing an image to a card substrate fed from a card supply using a thermal print mechanism or an ink jet print mechanism. The thermal print mechanism utilizes a thermal print ribbon supply, whereas the ink jet print mechanism utilizes an ink cartridge supply. When the identification card manufacturing device is a laminator, the card producing application can control the operation of the identification card laminator to laminate the printed card using an overlaminate supply. Other identification card processing devices, such as data encoders and card flippers, can also be controlled by the identification card manufacturing application.
Such systems are typically shipped with the components configured in accordance with default factory settings. The settings relate to driver settings for the card manufacturing device, component settings for the card manufacturing device (e.g., printer settings), and other default settings. The user of the system has the ability to modify some of the default settings of the system to tailor the system to his or her needs. Unfortunately, modifications to the default settings can complicate troubleshooting efforts should problems arise. It would, therefore, be desirable to be able to quickly identify how the system has been modified from the default settings to assist support personnel in the troubleshooting process.
In an effort to provide improved security from identification card counterfeiting, some consumable supplies are now customized for the user by providing them with a memory containing supply information that can be used to limit the use of the supply with only the user's identification card manufacturing system. One purpose of such a practice is to prevent the generation of fraudulent cards through the unauthorized use of the supplies with other card manufacturing systems.
The supplies and the card manufacturing systems are preferably customized for the user by a particular dealer. It is preferable for the user to contact the same dealer for submitting orders for new supplies as well as to receive support for the user's card manufacturing system.
There is a continuing need to make the use of identification card manufacturing systems as convenient for the user as possible. For example, it would be desirable to improve the ordering process for the consumable supply through use of the supply information contained in the memory of the supply to direct the user to their particular dealer.
One aspect of the present invention is generally directed to a method of ordering a consumable supply produced by a card manufacturing device of an identification card manufacturing system. In the method, a request to order the consumable supply is received from a user. Next, supply information relating to the supply is retrieved and the supply information is provided to a first web address. Finally, a second web address, which is different from the first web address and is associated with the supply, is retrieved through the first web address based upon the supply information.
Another aspect of the present invention is directed to a diagnostic report for a card manufacturing system that includes a card manufacturing device. The diagnostic report includes a list of current settings including current default settings that match default settings for the device. The current default settings also include modified settings that are different from the default settings for the device. The modified settings are highlighted to thereby visibly distinguish them from the current default settings. Additional embodiments of the invention are directed to a method of generating the diagnostic report.
Other features and benefits that characterize embodiments of the present invention will be apparent upon reading the following detailed description and review of the associated drawings.
Identification card printers utilize card processing devices 106 in the form of thermal printheads that are configured to apply dye from a print ribbon supply 108 to a surface of the card substrate 104, or ink jet printheads that are configured to apply an ink supply 108 from an ink cartridge to the surface of the card substrate. Identification card laminators, on the other hand, typically utilize overlaminate supplies 108 including those having security marks, such as holograms, that are applied to printed surfaces of the card substrate 104 using a card processing device 106 in the form of a heated roller and platen.
The consumable supplies 108 preferably include a memory 110, in which supply information 112 is contained. The supply information 112 includes information that identifies the supply 108, such as a part number, dealer information, a default quantity (e.g., starting amounts) of the supply, a customer number, and a price for the supply 108, for example. Additionally, the consumable supply 108 can be a customized supply that includes security data, such as a customer specific security code, which is used to determine whether the supply is authorized for use with the card manufacturing device 102. Unlike traditional supplies, such customized supplies and systems are preferably sold to the user by a specific dealer, who the user must return to for additional customized supplies 108, new card manufacturing devices 102, and other products relating to the user's system 100. Additionally, support for the user's system is preferably provided by the user's dealer. Examples of such supplies 108 are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/372,011 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/722,377, both of which are assigned to Fargo Electronics, Inc., and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Typical card manufacturing devices 102 operate to process a card processing job, such as a print job, that is produced by a card producing application 114 stored in memory 116 that is accessible by a computer 118. Alternatively, memory 119 of the card manufacturing device 102 can include the card processing application 114. The user of the system 100 can view an application interface provided on a display 120 and operate the application 114 through an input device 122 of the computer 118, such as a keyboard, mouse, etc., to form the card processing job.
The card-processing job is presented to a controller 124 of the card manufacturing device 102 through a suitable driver application stored in memory 114 of the computer 118 or memory 119 of the card manufacturing device 102. The controller 124 controls the card processing devices 106 of the card manufacturing device 102 to perform the desired operation on the card substrate 104 and complete the processing of the card processing job, in accordance with conventional methods.
Supply Ordering
One aspect of the present invention is directed to a method of ordering the consumable supply 108 for the card manufacturing device 102. The method is generally implemented by a computer application or program, such as the card producing application 114, in combination with a web browser 126. Those skilled in the art understand that other computer programs and applications including applications that may not directly relate to identification card production, such as a security application, could be executed to implement the supply ordering method of the present invention. Accordingly, the card producing application 114, as used herein, is not intended to describe only computer applications that are used to manufacture identification cards, but to also describe computer applications that may serve other purposes than card manufacture.
As with the application 114, the card manufacturing device 102 can include the web browser 126 in the memory 119, as shown in
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, an authorization routine is triggered following the generation of the order request and a security check is made to determine whether the user is authorized to order the consumable supply 108. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the authorization routine includes prompting the user to enter an identification of the card manufacturing device 102 and/or a customer number, and a password, as shown in the screen shot of
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a supply ordering option is provided to the user automatically when the amount of the consumable supply 108 is determined to be low. For instance, periodic checks of the supply 108 are made to determine whether the amount of remaining supply has dropped below a threshold level. This can be accomplished through decrementing an initial amount of the supply 108 that is stored in the memory 110 as the supply 108 is used, and notifying the user of the low supply amount once it has dropped below the threshold level. Alternatively, sensors can be used to measure a level of the consumable supply 108, such as ink, and notify the user that the supply 108 has dropped below a threshold level.
Upon detection of the low amount of the supply 108, the driver application or card producing application 114 can display a supply information window 142 to the user, such as that illustrated in
The supply information can also be displayed to the user prior to the remaining consumable supply 108 dropping below the threshold, through the selection of a print supplies option within the driver application or card producing application 114, the selection of which can produce the window 142 of
Referring again to the flowchart of
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, at least some of the supply information 112 is retrieved from the memory 110 that is attached to the supply 108. A discussion of such a supply and the methods of customizing card manufacturing devices 102 and supplies 108 for limited use is provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/372,011, which is assigned to Fargo Electronics, Inc. and is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Additional supply information can be retrieved from other conventional sources, such as memory 116 that is accessible by the computer 118, memory 119 of the device 102, and other sources.
At step 154 of the method, the retrieved supply information 112 is provided to a first web address. The first web address generally corresponds to a master web site whose server has access to a preferably secure database that contains information that is associated with the retrieved supply information 112.
At step 156, a second web address is obtained through the first web address based upon the retrieved supply information 112. The second web address is different from the first web address and generally corresponds to a dealer web site where the supply 108 can be ordered by the user in accordance with conventional methods. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the second web address is retrieved from the secure database and is associated with the retrieved supply information 112. In addition to the second web address, the secure database can also retrieve other information based upon the supply information 112, such as dealer contact information, order history, and other information relating to the supply 108 and/or the customer of the supply 108.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the user is linked to the second web address, at step 158 of the method. An exemplary web page corresponding to the second web address is illustrated in
Diagnostic Report
Another aspect of the present invention relates to a diagnostic report 200 for the system 100, an exemplary display of which is provided in
The information contained in the diagnostic report can be retrieved from the memory 119 of the device 102, the memory 110 of the supply 108, the memory 116 that is accessible by the computer 118, provided to the user on a CD, or otherwise accessible by the system 100.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, an option, such as a button 209, for generating the diagnostic report 200 is provided in a diagnostics window 210 (
One embodiment of the diagnostic report 200 includes a list of current settings, generally designated as 212, that includes current default settings 214 and modified settings 216 for the card manufacturing device 102. The current default settings 214 match the default settings for the card manufacturing device 102 that are set at the manufacturing facility or dealer. The modified settings 216 are different from the default settings for the card manufacturing device 102, including the current default settings 214, and are highlighted in the diagnostic report 200 to thereby visibly distinguish them from the current default settings 214.
The highlighting of the modified settings 216 allows the reviewer of the diagnostic report 200 to quickly assess where modifications have been made to the system 100 in order to speed up the troubleshooting process. Many different methods of highlighting the modified settings 216 can be used to visibly distinguish them from the current default settings 214. For example, the modified settings 216 can be presented in a different color (see e.g., the current “Die Sub Intensity” setting) as compared to the current default settings 214 (see e.g., the current “Temp” setting), or the modified settings 216 can be presented in a different font or size (see e.g., the current “Overlay Print-Areal” setting) as compared to the current default settings 214.
Additional techniques that can be applied to either the modified settings 216 or the current default settings 214 to highlight and visibly distinguish the modified settings 216 from the current default settings 214 include, for example, underlining (see e.g., the current “Image Darkness” setting), surrounding the setting in a text box (see e.g., the current “Firmware Version” setting), or presenting the modified settings 216 with a different colored background than the current default settings 214 (see e.g., the current “Firmware Version” setting). It should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the above list of highlighting techniques and that many other techniques can be used to provide the desired visibly distinguishing characteristic to the modified settings as compared to the current default setting.
Diagnostic report 200 can also include a list of the default settings 230 that were originally set at the factory. The default settings 230 are preferably positioned adjacent to the corresponding current setting 212. Alternatively, the default setting 230 can be provided adjacent to only the modified settings 216.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, additional troubleshooting assistance can be provided by listing a date 232 at which the modified settings 216 came into effect adjacent each modified setting 216.
One embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method of generating the diagnostic report 200, a flowchart of which is provided in
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application is based on and claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/501,932, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3193430 | Messmer et al. | Jul 1965 | A |
3446415 | Bromley | May 1969 | A |
3761079 | Azure, Jr. | Sep 1973 | A |
3887106 | Charlson et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3889472 | Guillaud | Jun 1975 | A |
3960072 | Ahlgren et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4021032 | Gross et al. | May 1977 | A |
4068028 | Samonides | Jan 1978 | A |
4146900 | Arnold | Mar 1979 | A |
4179732 | Khan et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4282583 | Khan et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4313683 | Brown et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4393386 | De Giulio | Jul 1983 | A |
4471885 | Mucciarone | Sep 1984 | A |
4534313 | Louvel | Aug 1985 | A |
4604631 | Jinnai et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4617080 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4680596 | Logan | Jul 1987 | A |
4685702 | Kazuharu | Aug 1987 | A |
4686540 | Leslie et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4716346 | Matsuo | Dec 1987 | A |
4719626 | Ogasawara | Jan 1988 | A |
4734868 | DeLacy | Mar 1988 | A |
4750743 | Nicoletti | Jun 1988 | A |
4781985 | Desjarlais | Nov 1988 | A |
4938830 | Cannistra | Jul 1990 | A |
4961088 | Gilliland et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5018614 | Ruckert | May 1991 | A |
5027135 | Negishi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5161233 | Matsuo et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5184181 | Kurando et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5238524 | Seki et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5266968 | Stephenson | Nov 1993 | A |
5267800 | Petteruti et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5277501 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5290067 | Langen | Mar 1994 | A |
5318369 | Ishii | Jun 1994 | A |
5318370 | Nehowig | Jun 1994 | A |
5326179 | Fukai et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5327201 | Coleman et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5368677 | Ueda et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5373146 | Lei | Dec 1994 | A |
5378884 | Lundstrom et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5410642 | Hakamatsuka et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412779 | Motoyama | May 1995 | A |
5413532 | Raby | May 1995 | A |
5437960 | Nagate et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441921 | Verdonck et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455611 | Simon et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466319 | Zager et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5484502 | Bozanic | Jan 1996 | A |
5516218 | Amano et al. | May 1996 | A |
5537554 | Motoyama | Jul 1996 | A |
5544289 | Motoyama | Aug 1996 | A |
5550735 | Slade et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550984 | Gelb | Aug 1996 | A |
5552994 | Cannon et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558449 | Morgavi | Sep 1996 | A |
5568618 | Motoyama | Oct 1996 | A |
5573621 | Boreali | Nov 1996 | A |
5630581 | Rodesch | May 1997 | A |
5637174 | Field et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646388 | D'Entremont et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649120 | Motoyama | Jul 1997 | A |
5673076 | Nardone et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5695589 | German et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709484 | Dorner | Jan 1998 | A |
5709485 | Kohno | Jan 1998 | A |
5715381 | Hamilton | Feb 1998 | A |
5717776 | Watanabe | Feb 1998 | A |
5727137 | LeClair et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5745036 | Clare | Apr 1998 | A |
5758184 | Lucovsky et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768143 | Fujimoto | Jun 1998 | A |
5768483 | Maniwa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768495 | Campbell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771058 | Kobayashi | Jun 1998 | A |
5771071 | Bradley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771382 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774678 | Motoyama | Jun 1998 | A |
5783024 | Forkert | Jul 1998 | A |
5785224 | Nowakowski | Jul 1998 | A |
5790162 | Adams et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796420 | Kaerts et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805810 | Maxwell | Sep 1998 | A |
5807461 | Hagstrom | Sep 1998 | A |
5819110 | Motoyama | Oct 1998 | A |
5822534 | Yamunachari et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828567 | Eryurek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835911 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837991 | LaManna et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860068 | Cook | Jan 1999 | A |
5862260 | Rhoads | Jan 1999 | A |
5873606 | Haas et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874145 | Waller | Feb 1999 | A |
5884014 | Huttenlocher et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886334 | D'Entremont et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887216 | Motoyama | Mar 1999 | A |
5889866 | Cyras et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5936542 | Kleinrock et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941414 | Kasper | Aug 1999 | A |
5941522 | Hagstrom et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5962832 | Dorner | Oct 1999 | A |
5973692 | Knowlton et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980011 | Cummins et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6022429 | Hagstrom | Feb 2000 | A |
6033832 | Wingender | Mar 2000 | A |
6070146 | Mimata | May 2000 | A |
6100804 | Brady et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6182136 | Ramanathan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189103 | Nevarez et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196459 | Goman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199753 | Tracy et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219669 | Haff et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220511 | Holec et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233683 | Chan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6272472 | Danneels et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292092 | Chow et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298336 | Davis et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335799 | Provost | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6380965 | Sims et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386772 | Klinefelter et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6412991 | Klinefelter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6554512 | Heno et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6582141 | Meier et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584290 | Kurz et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6629134 | Hayward et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631967 | Saruta | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6644771 | Silverbrook | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647871 | Morand | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663100 | Crowley | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6694884 | Klinefelter et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6758616 | Pribula et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6788800 | Carr et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6816968 | Walmsley | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6850901 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6929413 | Schofield | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20020051167 | Francis et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072998 | Haines et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091585 | Asauchi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116301 | Chapman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118243 | Forman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020171728 | Pribula et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020180993 | Klinefelter et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023703 | Hayward et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028766 | Gass et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046171 | Whale | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059050 | Hohberger et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030139973 | Claremont et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152409 | Pribula et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167213 | Jammes et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182587 | Morrison et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030216826 | Klinefelter et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040022572 | Bungert et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
FY 25 35 699 | Mar 1977 | DE |
196 44 306 | May 1998 | DE |
0 195 104 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0 562 979 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0 597 135 | May 1994 | EP |
0 659 588 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 278 517 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0 887 197 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 924 597 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1488303 | Mar 2003 | EP |
2 667 416 | Apr 1992 | FR |
2 120 821 | Dec 1983 | GB |
8-187921 | Jul 1996 | JP |
2001-24838 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-215231 | Aug 2001 | JP |
WO 8607480 | Dec 1986 | WO |
WO 9509084 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9639656 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9852762 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9851508 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9921713 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9949379 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0043932 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 03059632 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03060811 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2003019459 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03079168 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004011268 | Feb 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050060239 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60501932 | Sep 2003 | US |