Identification documents and authentication of such documents

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8280101
  • Patent Number
    8,280,101
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 22, 2009
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 2, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates generally to identification documents. One claim recites an apparatus to authentic an identification document. The identification document comprising first machine-readable information including a first plural-bit message, and semantic information carried on or in the identification document. The apparatus includes: a first reader to read the first machine-readable information to obtain the first plural-bit message; a second reader to obtain information from the semantic information carried on or in the identification document; an electronic processor programmed as a decryption unit to decrypt the first plural-bit message or the information obtained from the semantic information; and an electronic processor programmed as a decision unit to determine whether the identification document is authentic based at least in part on the first plural-bit message and the semantic information. Other claims and combinations are provided as well.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to security documents such as passports, driver's licenses, credit cards, etc. and to systems for producing and validating such documents.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many security documents contain a picture of the owner of the document. For example, a driver's license generally includes a picture of the driver and a passport generally includes a picture of the owner of the passport. Validation of such documents is performed by comparing the actual physical appearance of the person possessing the document to the picture on the document. A common counterfeiting technique involves replacing the picture on a security document with a picture of someone who is not the owner of the document.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,886 which will issue Nov. 24, 1998 describes a technique whereby a digital watermark is included in the picture on a security document. The security document contains human readable text that is related to the data contained in the watermark. The document can be inserted into a scanner which will read the watermark and the operator can compare the output of watermark reader to the text to insure that the person possessing the document is the legitimate owner.


Custom printing systems are available which accept data from multiple sources and which produce documents which are tailored to individual customer characteristics or to information concerning an individual customer. Such systems can for example produce personalized documents that include both fixed information that is on each document that is printed and variable information such as personal information about an individual's account at an institution such as a bank. One such system is commercially marketed under the trademark “PageFlex” by Bitstream Inc. or Cambridge Mass.


Likewise the technology for producing images which contain steganographic information in the form of digital watermarks is well developed. For example see U.S. Pat. No. 5,636,292, U.S. Pat. No. 5,748,783 or the “Communications of the ACM” published July 1998 Vol. 41. No. 7 pages 31 to 77. Commercial products which can store and read digital watermarks are also widely available. Examples of such products include “Adobe PhotoShop” Versions 4.0 and 5.0 and “Adobe ImageReady” Version 1.0 which are marketed by Adobe Corporation, “CorelDRAW” Versions 7 and 8, and “Corel PHOTO-PAINT” Versions 7 and 8 which are marketed by Corel Corporation, and Micrografx Webtricity” Versions 1 and 2, “Micrografx Graphics Suite 2”, and “Micrografx Picture Publisher” Versions 7 and 8 which are marketed by Micrografx Corporation.


Security documents such as passports and drivers licenses have traditionally contained both images and printed text. However, the images and the text in such documents are generally prepared in separate processes and merely merged at a final step in the overall production.


The present invention is directed to an improved security document which has several correlated multi-level self validating features. The present invention is also directed to an improved overall method and system for producing security documents and to automatic authentication systems for such documents. With the present invention the document contains a number of different kinds of information that is hidden from normal view and which can be correlated to validate the document. The validation can be done entirely automatically decreasing the need for human intervention.


With the prior art systems, a human being such as an immigration officer must examine a passport to determine if the person presenting the document is the rightful owner of the document. With the present invention, the authentication can be done entirely automatically, leaving the human operator free to handle non-routine situations.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides security documents which has multiple fields or areas each of which contains information that is perceptible in more than one way. For example, one field can contain a visually perceptible image and a digital watermark that can be detected when the image is scanned and processed, another field can contain machine readable OCR text that can be read by both a human and by a programmed computer, and still another field can contain watermark data which can be correlated to the output of a fingerprint reader or apparatus which scans a user's iris.


Documents in accordance with the present invention are produced by a system and method which begins with a template which defines the placements of elements on the document and the interrelationships between hidden and visual information on the document. That is, the template specifies the placement of elements such as images, photographs, and text and it also specifies the interrelationship between information that is visually perceptible to a user of the document and information that is hidden (not perceptible to a user) by means of digital watermarks. Different hidden digital watermark data is included in multiple elements of the document. The watermarks in the different graphic elements of the document are correlated to each other and correlated to the visual material on the document. In this way the document can not be forged by replacing one element (such as a picture) with a similar element from another document. In order to produce a document defined by a particular template, appropriate pictures, graphics and digital data are extracted from a data bank, and watermark data is embedded in the pictures and graphics as appropriate. The merged digital data is then sent to a printing engine and the final document is produced.


An automatic validation system of the present invention reads multiple fields on the document, and it also automatically detects information about the user. The various information is correlated to validate the document.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a security document in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 2 is an overall diagram of a preferred embodiment of a system to produce security documents in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a diagram of a document validation system that operates in accordance with the present invention.





DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

A diagram of a security document in accordance with the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. The security features on the document are a pre-printed background 11 which has an image or pattern (not visible in FIG. 1) which contains a digital watermark. The image in background 11 may contains lines the width of which are varied to carry a watermark in accordance with the technique described in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/074,034 filed May 6, 1998 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,449,377), the disclosure of which in incorporated herein in its entirety.


The document also contains a photograph 12 which shows the owner of the document. This photograph 12 contains a watermark such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,886 which will issue Nov. 24, 1998. The personalized background 14 can for example be a background image which corresponds to the image 12. While the personalized image 14 corresponds to the photograph 12, in area 14 the image is printed as a background image. Background images of various types are conventional, for example personal checks frequently have background images of animals, mountains, etc. The background text makes it hard to change the human readable text 15 which is printed over the background text. The bottom of the document has machine readable OCR-B text 16 and a Bar code 17.


It should be clearly understood that the document shown in FIG. 1 is merely illustrative of the various elements that can be combined to form a security document. The exact layout can vary depending upon the needs of the particular application. If desired for a particular application, the document can be much more complex than the document shown in FIG. 1. The document can have many more fields and elements than does the document shown in FIG. 1. Furthermore the document could contain the various other known technology for preventing counterfeiting such as special paper and special ink.


Document shown in FIG. 1 can for example be a document such as a driver's license in which case the picture 12 would be a picture of the owner of the license. Graphic image 11 could for example be a state seal. The text 15 could for example include the driver's license number, the owner's age, and the owner's address.


Document 10 can be a passport. In a passport, the hidden digital watermark data in picture 12 and in the other fields could be coordinated as follows:
















Watermark contains
Correlates to


















Pre-printed
unique document “batch”



background 11
number


Photo 12:
Batch number and passport
OCR-B version of passport



number (cryptographically
number, Human readable



encoded)
passport number, Master




document


Personalized
“hash” of fingerprint
fingerprint of the holder


background 14

which is automatically read


Bar code 17
Passport number
Watermark in photo 12



(in code not in watermark)


OCR-B text 16
Passport number Batch
Info in photo 12, back-



number (in text not
ground 11 And Bar code 17



in watermark)









An important point is that the various elements of hidden and visual information are coordinated in such a manner that the document is self authenticating. The hidden data in one field can be correlated with the hidden data in another field to insure that the document has not been altered.


If for example one tried to alter a document by replacing picture 12 with a different picture, the new picture would either contain no hidden data, or if it were a picture taken from a different document, the numbers stored in the picture would not match the printed information in text field 15.


If the picture from one document were substituted for the picture in a second document, the cryptographically encoded serial numbers could be used to determine the origin of the picture. It is noted that while in the example shown above, both the Batch number and passport number are cryptographically encoded, other numbers such as a serial number or an ID number could also be encoded in a special manner.



FIG. 2 shows an overall diagram of a system for producing document 10. The system includes a number of units, the operation of which is controlled and coordinated by a control computer 20. The following explanation will illustrate how the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 can be used to produce a document such as the document shown in FIG. 1.


A template 21 is used to define the overall characteristics of a document. The characteristics specified by template 21, including the fields on the document, the data printed in any text fields and the watermarks included in each image included on the document.


The template 21 is used by document layout device 26 to layout a particular document for production. Data which is to be included in the watermarks in any image field are stored in Watermark data store 22. Any pictures, text data, and Graphics are stored in units 23, 24 and 25 respectively.


The document layout from unit 26, the digital watermark data from unit 22 and the pictures, text data and graphics from units 23, 24, and 25 are sent to Merging and watermarking unit 27. Unit 27 applies watermarks to pictures and graphics as specified by the layout information from unit 11. Application of the watermarks to the pictures and graphics can be done in a conventional manner; however, prior to sending the watermark payload (i.e. the data stored in the watermark) to the watermarking engine, the data can be passed through a conventional encryption program. Encrypting the payload data provides an added assurance that a counterfeiter could not make a counterfeit document. The level of encryption could be any level appropriate to the value of the document.


The output from the Merging and watermarking unit 27 is then sent to a conventional printing engine 28 which produces a final document 10.


Watermark Data storage 22, picture storage 23, digital data storage 24 and graphics storage 25 can be conventional data storage servers. Physically they could all be provided by one physical storage unit. Template input unit 21 is a conventional interactive terminal or personal computer with a graphic design program. Merging and watermarking unit 27 can be a conventional watermarking engine.


The system shown in FIG. 2 produces various parts of the security document in a single step, thereby making it much harder to replace one element on a security document with a similar element from another document.



FIG. 3 is a diagram of a document self authentication unit in accordance with the present invention. The system has three input units, each of which is conventional and commercially available. The input units are a magnetic stripe reader 301, a high resolution image scanner 302, and a fingerprint reader 303. The document 10, shown in FIG. 1 does not include a magnetic stripe, but one of the alternatives for such a document is to include a magnetic stripe.


The output from scanner 302 goes to three units (that is, to three computer programs) 305, 307 and 311. Alternatively, the bar code reader 305 could be a separate unit which directly reads the bar code and provides information to comparison and authentication unit 312.


If the bar code reader 305 is a computer program which receives information from the output of scanner 302, the program 305 will read the bar code 17. OCR program 307 reads the text 15 and the text 16 and watermark detector 311 reads the watermarks in images 11, 12 and 14.


An authentication and comparison unit 312 compares the data from units 301, 303, 305, 307 and 311 to determine if the data matches. If the data in some of the watermarks is encrypted, the comparison and authentication unit 312 would include an appropriate decryption program. The decryption program in unit 312 could obtain the decryption key from remote data base 314 in response to the number read by one of the devices. Alternatively, the encrypted data could be automatically sent to a central facility for decryption. The unit 312 can also access a remote data base 314 to determine if there is any special handling that is required for the document that has been presented. For example data base 314 could contain information about passports that have been cancelled for various reasons. The resulting information is displayed on a display unit 320.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus to authenticate an identification document, the identification document comprising: an image including steganographically encoded first machine-readable information including a first plural-bit message,a background including steganographically encoded second machine-readable information including a second plural-bit message, andsemantic information including authentication information carried on or in the identification document,the apparatus comprising:a first reader configured to determine the first plural-bit message based on the first machine-readable information and determine the second plural-bit message based on the second machine-readable information;a second reader configured to determine authentication information from the semantic information carried on or in the identification document; andan electronic processor configured to: decrypt the first plural-bit message or the authentication information; anddetermine whether the identification document is authentic based at least in part on the first plural-bit message, the second plural-bit message, and the authentication information,wherein the second plural-bit message comprises information from the first plural-bit message and the authentication information.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the semantic information comprises optical character recognition (OCR) characters.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the semantic information comprises data representing a photograph.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first reader and the second reader are configured to process optical scan data.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first machine-readable information comprises a digital watermark.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the electronic processor is further configured to access a decryption key stored in a remote location that is associated with the identification document via an identifier carried on or in the identification document.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the identifier is carried by machine-recognizable indicia on or in the identification document.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the machine-recognizable indicia comprises a digital watermark.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first plural-bit message comprises information from the authentication information.
  • 10. A method of authenticating an identification document, the identification document comprising: an image including steganographically encoded first machine-readable information including a first plural-bit message,a background including steganographically encoded second machine-readable information including a second plural-bit message, andsemantic information including authentication information carried on or in the identification document,the method comprising:determining, using a processor, the first plural-bit message based on the first machine-readable information;determining the second plural-bit message based on the second machine-readable information;determining the authentication information from the semantic information carried on or in the identification document;decrypting the first plural-bit message or the authentication information; anddetermining whether the identification document is authentic based at least in part on the first plural-bit message, the second plural-bit message, and the authentication information,wherein the second plural-bit message comprises information from the first plural-bit message and the authentication information.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the first plural-bit message comprises information from the authentication information.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the semantic information comprises optical character recognition (OCR) characters.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the semantic information comprises data representing a photograph and the first machine-readable information comprises a digital watermark.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the first reader and the second reader are configured to process optical scan data.
  • 15. The method of claim 10, further comprising accessing a decryption key stored in a remote location that is associated with the identification document via an identifier carried on or in the identification document.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the identifier comprises a digital watermark.
  • 17. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that, if executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform operations for authenticating an identification document, the identification document comprising: an image including steganographically encoded first machine-readable information including a first plural-bit message,a background including steganographically encoded second machine-readable information including a second plural-bit message, andsemantic information including authentication information carried on or in the identification document,the operations comprising:determining the first plural-bit message based on the first machine-readable information;determining the second plural-bit message based on the second machine-readable information;determining the authentication information from the semantic information carried on or in the identification document;decrypting the first plural-bit message or the authentication information; anddetermining whether the identification document is authentic based at least in part on the first plural-bit message, the second plural-bit message, and the authentication information,wherein the second plural-bit message comprises information from the first plural-bit message and the authentication information.
  • 18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the first plural-bit message comprises information from the authentication information.
  • 19. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the semantic information comprises optical character recognition (OCR) characters.
  • 20. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the semantic information comprises data representing a photograph and the first machine-readable information comprises a digital watermark.
  • 21. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the first reader and the second reader are configured to process optical scan data.
  • 22. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the operations further comprise accessing a decryption key stored in a remote location that is associated with the identification document via an identifier carried on or in the identification document.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/626,150, filed Jan. 23, 2007 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,837) which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/286,154, filed Nov. 23, 2005 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,269,275) which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/011,129 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,970,573) which are each hereby incorporated by reference. The 10/011,129 application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/422,780, filed Nov. 18, 1999 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,151) which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/109,259, filed Nov. 19, 1998. The 09/442,780 application is also a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/074,034, filed May 6, 1998 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,449,377). The 10/011,129 application is also a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/198,022, filed Nov. 23, 1998 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,546,112) which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/763,847, filed Dec. 4, 1996 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,886) which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/512,993, filed Aug. 9, 1995 (now abandoned).

US Referenced Citations (253)
Number Name Date Kind
4359633 Bianco Nov 1982 A
4568936 Goldman Feb 1986 A
4590366 Rothfjell May 1986 A
4675746 Tetrick et al. Jun 1987 A
4689477 Goldman Aug 1987 A
4790566 Boissier et al. Dec 1988 A
4837422 Dethloff et al. Jun 1989 A
4965568 Atalla et al. Oct 1990 A
4972476 Nathans Nov 1990 A
5237164 Takada Aug 1993 A
5284364 Jain Feb 1994 A
5319453 Copriviza et al. Jun 1994 A
5321751 Ray et al. Jun 1994 A
5337361 Wang et al. Aug 1994 A
5351302 Leighton et al. Sep 1994 A
5379344 Larsson et al. Jan 1995 A
5379345 Greenberg Jan 1995 A
5384846 Berson et al. Jan 1995 A
5432506 Chapman Jul 1995 A
5436970 Ray et al. Jul 1995 A
5469506 Berson et al. Nov 1995 A
5471533 Wang et al. Nov 1995 A
5490217 Wang et al. Feb 1996 A
5499293 Behram et al. Mar 1996 A
5499294 Friedman Mar 1996 A
5505494 Belluci et al. Apr 1996 A
5509692 Oz Apr 1996 A
5515451 Tsuji et al. May 1996 A
5636292 Rhoads Jun 1997 A
5646997 Barton Jul 1997 A
5652626 Kawakami et al. Jul 1997 A
5659726 Sandford, II et al. Aug 1997 A
5664018 Leighton Sep 1997 A
5694471 Chen et al. Dec 1997 A
5719948 Liang Feb 1998 A
5721788 Powell et al. Feb 1998 A
5740244 Indeck et al. Apr 1998 A
5745604 Rhoads Apr 1998 A
5748763 Rhoads May 1998 A
5748783 Rhoads May 1998 A
5760386 Ward Jun 1998 A
5768426 Rhoads Jun 1998 A
5786587 Colgate, Jr. Jul 1998 A
5787186 Schroeder Jul 1998 A
5790662 Valerij et al. Aug 1998 A
5799092 Kristol et al. Aug 1998 A
5822432 Moskowitz et al. Oct 1998 A
5825892 Braudaway et al. Oct 1998 A
5838814 Moore Nov 1998 A
5841886 Rhoads Nov 1998 A
5850481 Rhoads Dec 1998 A
5862218 Steinberg Jan 1999 A
5864622 Marcus Jan 1999 A
5864623 Messina et al. Jan 1999 A
5890742 Waller Apr 1999 A
5907149 Marckini May 1999 A
5912974 Holloway et al. Jun 1999 A
5949885 Leighton Sep 1999 A
5951055 Mowry, Jr. Sep 1999 A
5984366 Priddy Nov 1999 A
5995625 Sudia et al. Nov 1999 A
6024287 Takai et al. Feb 2000 A
6026193 Rhoads Feb 2000 A
6040783 Houvener et al. Mar 2000 A
6064764 Bhaskaran et al. May 2000 A
6086707 Waller Jul 2000 A
6104812 Koltai et al. Aug 2000 A
6122392 Rhoads Sep 2000 A
6122403 Rhoads Sep 2000 A
6154571 Cox et al. Nov 2000 A
6185312 Nakamura et al. Feb 2001 B1
6185316 Buffam Feb 2001 B1
6229924 Rhoads et al. May 2001 B1
6243480 Zhao et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266430 Rhoads Jul 2001 B1
6268058 Tahon et al. Jul 2001 B1
6285776 Rhoads Sep 2001 B1
6289108 Rhoads Sep 2001 B1
6292092 Chow et al. Sep 2001 B1
6321981 Ray et al. Nov 2001 B1
6330335 Rhoads Dec 2001 B1
6343138 Rhoads Jan 2002 B1
6353672 Rhoads Mar 2002 B1
6363159 Rhoads Mar 2002 B1
6369904 Bhattacharjya et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389151 Carr et al. May 2002 B1
6400827 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6404898 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6411392 Bender et al. Jun 2002 B1
6430302 Rhoads Aug 2002 B2
6449377 Rhoads Sep 2002 B1
6449379 Rhoads Sep 2002 B1
6463416 Messina Oct 2002 B1
6496591 Rhoads Dec 2002 B1
6496933 Nunally Dec 2002 B1
6519352 Rhoads Feb 2003 B2
6522770 Seder et al. Feb 2003 B1
6522771 Rhoads Feb 2003 B2
6535618 Rhoads Mar 2003 B1
6539095 Rhoads Mar 2003 B1
6542618 Rhoads Apr 2003 B1
6542620 Rhoads Apr 2003 B1
6546112 Rhoads Apr 2003 B1
6560349 Rhoads May 2003 B1
6567534 Rhoads May 2003 B1
6567535 Rhoads May 2003 B2
6567780 Rhoads May 2003 B2
6574350 Rhoads et al. Jun 2003 B1
6580819 Rhoads Jun 2003 B1
6587821 Rhoads Jul 2003 B1
6590997 Rhoads Jul 2003 B2
6647129 Rhoads Nov 2003 B2
6654480 Rhoads Nov 2003 B2
6654887 Rhoads Nov 2003 B2
6674886 Davis et al. Jan 2004 B2
6675146 Rhoads Jan 2004 B2
6694041 Brunk Feb 2004 B1
6724912 Carr et al. Apr 2004 B1
6738495 Rhoads et al. May 2004 B2
6744907 Rhoads Jun 2004 B2
6750985 Rhoads Jun 2004 B2
6751336 Zhao Jun 2004 B2
6754377 Rhoads Jun 2004 B2
6757406 Rhoads Jun 2004 B2
6760464 Brunk Jul 2004 B2
6768808 Rhoads Jul 2004 B2
6771796 Rhoads Aug 2004 B2
6778682 Rhoads Aug 2004 B2
6782116 Zhao et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788800 Carr et al. Sep 2004 B1
6804377 Reed et al. Oct 2004 B2
6804379 Rhoads Oct 2004 B2
6882738 Davis et al. Apr 2005 B2
6944298 Rhoads Sep 2005 B1
6959100 Rhoads Oct 2005 B2
6959386 Rhoads Oct 2005 B2
6961444 Levy Nov 2005 B2
6965873 Rhoads Nov 2005 B1
6970573 Carr et al. Nov 2005 B2
6978036 Alattar et al. Dec 2005 B2
6983051 Rhoads Jan 2006 B1
6987862 Rhoads Jan 2006 B2
6993152 Patterson et al. Jan 2006 B2
6993154 Brunk Jan 2006 B2
7003132 Rhoads Feb 2006 B2
7020303 Levy et al. Mar 2006 B2
7020349 Brunk Mar 2006 B2
7027612 Patterson et al. Apr 2006 B2
7043052 Rhoads May 2006 B2
7054462 Rhoads et al. May 2006 B2
7054463 Rhoads et al. May 2006 B2
7076084 Davis et al. Jul 2006 B2
7016516 Rhoads Sep 2006 B2
7113569 Okumura et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113615 Rhoads et al. Sep 2006 B2
7116781 Rhoads Oct 2006 B2
7130087 Rhoads Oct 2006 B2
7142691 Levy Nov 2006 B2
7181022 Rhoads Feb 2007 B2
7184570 Rhoads Feb 2007 B2
7197164 Levy Mar 2007 B2
7239734 Alattar et al. Jul 2007 B2
7242790 Rhoads Jul 2007 B2
7246239 Rodriguez et al. Jul 2007 B2
7248715 Levy Jul 2007 B2
7263203 Rhoads et al. Aug 2007 B2
7266217 Rhoads et al. Sep 2007 B2
7269275 Carr et al. Sep 2007 B2
7277468 Tian et al. Oct 2007 B2
7286684 Rhoads et al. Oct 2007 B2
7305117 Davis et al. Dec 2007 B2
7313253 Davis et al. Dec 2007 B2
7321667 Stach Jan 2008 B2
7340076 Stach et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346776 Levy et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349555 Rhoads Mar 2008 B2
7359528 Rhoads Apr 2008 B2
7372976 Rhoads et al. May 2008 B2
7415129 Rhoads Aug 2008 B2
7418111 Rhoads Aug 2008 B2
7424132 Rhoads Sep 2008 B2
7499564 Rhoads Mar 2009 B2
7532741 Stach May 2009 B2
7536555 Rhoads May 2009 B2
7539325 Rhoads et al. May 2009 B2
7548643 Davis et al. Jun 2009 B2
7555139 Rhoads et al. Jun 2009 B2
7567686 Rhoads Jul 2009 B2
7570784 Alattar Aug 2009 B2
7602940 Rhoads et al. Oct 2009 B2
7602977 Rhoads et al. Oct 2009 B2
7606390 Rhoads Oct 2009 B2
7607016 Brunk et al. Oct 2009 B2
7620200 Rhoads Nov 2009 B2
7639837 Carr et al. Dec 2009 B2
7643649 Davis et al. Jan 2010 B2
7656930 Tian et al. Feb 2010 B2
7672477 Rhoads Mar 2010 B2
7676059 Rhoads Mar 2010 B2
7693965 Rhoads Apr 2010 B2
7697719 Rhoads Apr 2010 B2
7702511 Rhoads Apr 2010 B2
7711143 Rhoads May 2010 B2
7720249 Rhoads May 2010 B2
7720255 Rhoads May 2010 B2
7724919 Rhoads May 2010 B2
7760902 Rhoads Jul 2010 B2
7763179 Levy et al. Jul 2010 B2
7770013 Rhoads et al. Aug 2010 B2
7796826 Rhoads et al. Sep 2010 B2
7806322 Brundage et al. Oct 2010 B2
7822225 Alattar Oct 2010 B2
7831062 Stach Nov 2010 B2
7856116 Rodriguez et al. Dec 2010 B2
20010007975 Nyberg, Jr. et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010022848 Rhoads Sep 2001 A1
20020080995 Rhoads Jun 2002 A1
20020136429 Stach et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030021440 Rhoads Jan 2003 A1
20030133592 Rhoads Jul 2003 A1
20030138128 Rhoads Jul 2003 A1
20040057581 Rhoads Mar 2004 A1
20040128514 Rhoads Jul 2004 A1
20040181671 Brundage et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040263911 Rodriguez et al. Dec 2004 A1
20060028689 Perry et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060062386 Rhoads Mar 2006 A1
20070016790 Brundage et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070172098 Rhoads et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070180251 Carr et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070201835 Rhoads Aug 2007 A1
20080016360 Rodriguez et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080131083 Rhoads Jun 2008 A1
20080131084 Rhoads Jun 2008 A1
20080149713 Brundage Jun 2008 A1
20080253740 Rhoads Oct 2008 A1
20080270801 Levy et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080275906 Rhoads et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090252401 Davis et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100008534 Rhoads Jan 2010 A1
20100008536 Rhoads Jan 2010 A1
20100008537 Rhoads Jan 2010 A1
20100021004 Rhoads Jan 2010 A1
20100027969 Alattar Feb 2010 A1
20100040255 Rhoads Feb 2010 A1
20100042843 Brunk et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100119108 Rhoads May 2010 A1
20100131767 Rhoads May 2010 A1
20100142752 Rhoads et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100146285 Rhoads et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100163629 Rhoads et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100172538 Rhoads Jul 2010 A1
20110013802 Rhoads Jan 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
29 43 436 May 1981 DE
0 629 972 Dec 1994 EP
0 650 146 Apr 1995 EP
0 730 242 Sep 1996 EP
0 642 060 Apr 1999 EP
0 736 860 Oct 2002 EP
3-185585 Aug 1991 JP
WO 9513597 May 1995 WO
WO 9603286 Feb 1996 WO
WO 9626494 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9636163 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9843152 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9936876 Jul 1999 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110002503 A1 Jan 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60109259 Nov 1998 US
Continuations (6)
Number Date Country
Parent 11626150 Jan 2007 US
Child 12644534 US
Parent 11286154 Nov 2005 US
Child 11626150 US
Parent 10011129 Nov 2001 US
Child 11286154 US
Parent 09442780 Nov 1999 US
Child 10011129 US
Parent 08763847 Dec 1996 US
Child 09198022 US
Parent 08512993 Aug 1995 US
Child 08763847 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 09074034 May 1998 US
Child 09442780 US
Parent 09198022 Nov 1998 US
Child 10011129 US