1. Field of the Invention
The field of the present invention relates to embedded system devices, and more particularly the digital fingerprinting of embedded system devices.
2. Description of the Related Art
Embedded system devices are becoming more and more prevalent in everyday life. Examples of such devices include traffic signals, traffic cameras, digital cameras, digital video cameras, telephones, cellular phones, televisions, vehicles, vehicle navigation systems, and wireless routers, to name just a very few. Embedded system devices generally are designed to perform one, or just a few, dedicated functions, and perform them using a combination of hardware and software that is optimized for task. Such optimization often allows embedded system devices to be smaller, more cost efficient, more power efficient, and more reliable. With the explosion of embedded system devices in society, they are also increasingly being network enabled so that they can communicate, whether wired or wirelessly, with other devices and with designated servers. Given the connectedness of embedded system devices, it is becoming increasingly important to both authenticate the devices themselves at the outset of communications, and in some instances, to establish secure communications with the devices. Serial numbers, Media Access Control (MAC) addresses, and other forms of assigned identifiers can be limiting and are easily spoofed.
The present invention is directed toward the identification of embedded system devices. Identification is achieved by having the embedded system self-generate a device identifier based at least upon non-user-configurable parameters.
In a first separate aspect of the present invention, an embedded system device comprises a processor operatively coupled to a first memory space, a second memory space, and a plurality of user controls. The processor is configured to execute only executable code residing within the first memory space, and the executable code includes authentication routine configured to generate the device identifier. The second memory space includes user configurable options for use by the processor when executing the executable code. The user controls are adapted to configure the user configurable options within the second memory space, but the user controls cannot configure the first memory space.
In a second aspect of the present invention, building upon the first separate aspect, the device may further comprise a communication port, also operatively connected to the processor. Through the communication port, the first memory space may be accessed and altered. Further, the authentication routine may utilize the communication port to establish a communication link with a server and transmit the device identifier to the server.
In a third aspect of the present invention, also building upon the first separate aspect, the non-user-configurable parameters may include any one or more of the following: information about the device hardware; information about the executable code; information derived from the device hardware; and information derived from the executable code.
In a fourth separate aspect of the present invention, a system for authenticating an embedded system device comprises an authentication server with which the embedded system device communicates. In response to a communication link being available between the authentication server and the embedded system device, the authentication server is configured to first receive from the embedded system device an authentication request, which includes an assigned device identifier and a generated device identifier. Both identifiers identify the embedded system device, and the generated device identifier is based upon non-user-configurable parameters of the embedded system device. The server then accesses a database including records of known assigned device identifiers and known generated device identifiers. With both the authentication request and the database records available, the server compares the two data sources to authenticate the embedded system device.
In a fifth separate aspect of the present invention, building upon the fourth separate aspect, the embedded system device is configured to send the authentication request upon the communication link being established.
In a sixth separate aspect of the present invention, building upon the fourth separate aspect, the server may follow authentication of the embedded system device by establishing a secure communication link with the embedded system device.
In a seventh separate aspect of the present invention, any of the foregoing aspects may be employed in combination.
Accordingly, improved identification of embedded system devices is disclosed. Advantages of the improvements will appear from the drawings and the description of the preferred embodiment.
In the drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to similar components:
Turning in detail to the drawings,
The communication links between the network 107, on the one hand, and the embedded system devices 101, 103 and the authentication server 105, on the other hand, may take any form desired. For example, any of the communication links may be established through intermediaries such as a private communications network or over a public communications network, the Internet being an example of the latter. Alternatively, a private communications network, a public communications network, or any combination of one or more of such networks may form the network 107. Also, any of the communication links may be established directly or indirectly, permanent or transitory, wired and/or wireless. In some instances, the communication links may be established as needed.
With respect to the first embedded system device 101, during the authentication process, which is described in greater detail below, a communication link is established between the embedded system device 101 and the server 105. Either the embedded system device 101 or the server 105 may initiate the communication link as necessary or desired. After the communication link is established, the embedded system device 101 sends an authentication request to the server 105, and the server uses the records stored within the database 111 to provide authentication. The database 111 may reside on the server 105, or it may reside on another computing device that is communicatively connected with the server 105, as desired. The database 111 includes records of known embedded system devices, including at least the device identifier and the associated assigned identification for each known device. Other information, such as user, location, manufacturer, and the like may also be stored within the database and associated with the records for each embedded system device. Further, the database may be constructed from known embedded system devices as they are produced by a manufacturer, but before they are sold, or it may be constructed by adding data to the database from embedded system devices as authentication requests are received from devices that have already been placed into use. The database 111 thus serves as a master record for known embedded system devices, from which the server 105 draws information during the authentication process. Once authentication has been achieved, other communications may occur between the embedded system device 101 and the server 105, or between the embedded system device 101 and any other similarly authenticated device or system, with assurances that the authenticated devices and/or systems are not being spoofed or otherwise being falsely represented.
Hereinafter, any embedded system device, including the embedded system devices 101, 103 shown, will be referred to simply as a “device”, with the understanding that they may be any machine or device capable of communication with a computer network, either directly or indirectly, such as a game console, a personal digital assistant, a mobile phone, a wireless communication device, an onboard vehicle computer, a camera, a GPS system, and the like. Embedded system devices are less than computers that are fully programmable by the user. Such devices may be fully programmable, but not using the controls through which the user operates the device. For example, the user controls on a digital camera may allow the user to control the functionality and operation of the camera, but they do not permit the user to modify the underlying executable code that makes the camera function as a camera. The executable code, if it is alterable, may be accessed through a communication port, such as a Universal Serial Bus (USB) port, and then only after manufacturer codes are supplied to the camera's processor, thereby opening up the memory space holding the executable code to modification.
Other devices may operate in the same manner as the aforementioned digital camera, but with different controls and/or different types of communication ports. Such embedded devices are well-known in the relevant arts, and as such are only described in overview herein. The common technological similarities between all such embedded system devices include user controls that, under normal operating conditions, give the user no access to the executable code that provides functionality to the hardware of the device.
The second memory space 207 is reserved for storing user configurable options which are used by the processor 203 when executing the executable code stored within the first memory space 205. These user configurable options are selected by the user controls 209 and may enhance the functionality of the device 200 and its specific hardware components. The user controls 209, however, are limited to selection of the user configurable options, and cannot be used to modify the executable code stored within the first memory space 205. The user controls 209 may include any of buttons, scroll wheels, touch screens, sliders, switches, and the like as desired and/or needed for the device 200 to perform its desired function(s).
An authentication routine is one of the specific processes that is stored as executable code within the first memory space 205. The authentication routine may be called as needed or as desired. For example, the kernel 211 may be configured to call the authentication routine when a network connection is first obtained, regardless of whether the network connection is directly established or indirectly established through an intermediary device. As another example, the kernel 211 may be configured to call the authentication routine when prompted over an already established network connection.
The authentication routine assembles data from the hardware and/or the executable code stored within the first memory space 205 to generate a device identifier that forms part of the authentication request sent to the authentication server over an established communication link. The authentication request also preferably includes an assigned identifier for the device, with the device identifier, when generated in the manner described below, to serve as a verification on the assigned identifier. Any other desired information about the device may be included as part of the authentication request. Once the device identifier is generated, it is sent as part of the authentication request to the authentication server.
The authentication routine includes a device identifier subroutine that collects information regarding the embedded system device by checking a number of parameters which, collectively, are expected to uniquely identify the embedded system device. The description below presumes that the software includes a routine which generates the device identifier. The parameters checked may include, for example, hard disk volume name, user name, device name, user password, hard disk initialization date, etc. The collected information includes information that identifies the hardware of the device, such as, for example, CPU number, or unique parameters associated with the firmware in use. The system information may further include system configuration information, such as amount of memory, type of processor, software or operating system serial number, etc.
Based on the collected information, the routine generates a device identifier that uniquely identifies the embedded system device. The device identifier may be stored in memory included within of the device, and/or it may be generated each time authentication is required. The device identifier is generated by a process which operates on data indicative of the embedded system device's configuration and hardware.
The device identifier is generated using non-user-configurable machine parameters as input to a process that results in the device identifier, which may be expressed in digital data as a binary number. Each machine parameter is data determined by a hardware component, software component, or data component specific to the device that the unique identifier pertains to. This data may be invariable and/or variable. Machine parameters may be selected based on the embedded system device configuration such that the resulting device identifier has a very high probability (e.g., greater than 99.999%) of being unique to the embedded system device. In addition, the machine parameters may be selected such that the device identifier includes at least a stable unique portion up to and including the entire identifier, that has a very high probability of remaining unchanged during normal operation of the embedded system device. Thus, the resulting device identifier should be highly specific, unique, reproducible and stable as a result of properly selecting the machine parameters.
The identifier subroutine that generates the device identifier may also operate on the collected parameters with one or more algorithms to generate the device identifier. This process may include at least one irreversible transformation, such as, for example, a cryptographic hash function, such that the input machine parameters cannot be derived from the resulting device identifier. Each device identifier, to a very high degree of certainty, cannot be generated except by the suitably configured device identifier routine operating or otherwise having had access to the same embedded system device for which the device identifier was first generated. Conversely, each identifier, again to a very high degree of certainty, can be successfully reproduced by the suitably configured device identifier routine operating or otherwise having access to the same embedded system device on which the identifier was first generated.
The identifier subroutine may operate by performing a system scan to determine a present configuration of the embedded system device. The routine may then select the machine parameters to be used as input for generating the unique device identifier. Selection of parameters may vary depending on the system configuration. Once the parameters are selected, the routine may generate the identifier. Alternatively, for purposes of optimization, the machine parameters may be selected in advance, with the selection being preprogrammed into the identifier subroutine.
Further, generating the device identifier may also be described as generating a device fingerprint and may entail the sampling of physical, non-user configurable properties as well as a variety of additional parameters such as uniquely generated hashes and time sensitive values. Physical device parameters available for sampling may include, for example, unique manufacturer characteristics, carbon and silicone degradation and small device failures.
The process of measuring carbon and silicone degradation may be accomplished by measuring a chip's ability to process complex mathematical computations, and its ability to respond to intensive time variable computations. These processes measure how fast electricity travels through the carbon. Using variable offsets to compensate for factors such as heat and additional stresses placed on a chip during the sampling process allows for each and every benchmark to reproduce the expected values. During a standard operating lifetime, the process of passing electricity through the various switches causes a computer chip to degrade. These degradations manifest as gradually slower speeds that extend the processing time required to compute various benchmarking algorithms.
In addition to the chip benchmarking and degradation measurements, the process for generating a device identifier may include measuring physical, non-user-configurable characteristics of disk drives and solid state memory devices. Each data storage device has a large variety of damage and unusable data sectors that are nearly unique to each physical unit. The ability to measure and compare values for damaged sectors and data storage failures provides a method for identifying storage devices.
Device parameter sampling, damage measurement and chip benchmarking make up just a part of device fingerprinting technologies described herein. These tools may be further extended by the use of complex encryption algorithms to convolute the device identifier values during transmission and comparisons. Such encryption processes may be used in conjunction with random sampling and key generations.
The device identifier may be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: machine model; machine serial number; machine copyright; machine ROM version; machine bus speed; machine details; machine manufacturer; machine ROM release date; machine ROM size; machine UUID; and machine service tag.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: CPU ID; CPU model; CPU details; CPU actual speed; CPU family; CPU manufacturer; CPU voltage; and CPU external clock.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: memory model; memory slots; memory total; and memory details.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: video model; video details; display model; display details; audio model; and audio details.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: network model; network address; Bluetooth address; BlackBox model; BlackBox serial; BlackBox details; BlackBox damage map; BlackBox volume name; NetStore details; and NetStore volume name.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: optical model; optical serial; optical details; and the types and serial numbers of user controls that are incorporated into the device.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: baseboard manufacturer; baseboard product name; baseboard version; baseboard serial number; and baseboard asset tag.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: chassis manufacturer; chassis type; chassis version; and chassis serial number.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: IDE controller; SATA controller; RAID controller; and SCSI controller.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: port connector designator; port connector type; port connector port type; and system slot type.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: cache level; cache size; cache max size; cache SRAM type; and cache error correction type.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: fan; PCMCIA; modem; portable battery; tape drive; USB controller; and USB hub.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: device model; device model IMEI; device model IMSI; and device model LCD.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: wireless 802.11; camera; silicone serial; and PCI controller.
In one example, the device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: machine model, processor model, processor details, processor speed, memory model, memory total, network model of each Ethernet interface, network MAC address of each Ethernet interface, BlackBox Model, BlackBox Serial (e.g., using Dallas Silicone Serial DS-2401 chipset or the like), OS install date, nonce value, and nonce time of day.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing machine parameters associated with one or more of the following: numbers of process threads; assigned ID's of process threads, kernel information; driver information; the size of any and/or all embedded software and/or software threads.
The device identifier may also be generated by utilizing information about and/or signatures derived from the executable code, or any portion thereof, that is stored within the first memory space.
In addition to the above identified possibilities for parameters, the device identifier may be generated by utilizing any machine parameter, including embedded software, or parts thereof, that is identifiable and quantifiable.
Thus, identification of embedded system devices is disclosed. While embodiments of this invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the following claims.
As used in this application, the terms “component,” “module,” “system,” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, firmware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component can be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a computing device and the computing device can be a component. One or more components can reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component can be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers. In addition, these components can execute from various computer readable media having various data structures stored thereon. The components can communicate by way of local and/or remote processes such as in accordance with a signal having one or more data packets (e.g., data from one component interacting with another component in a local system, distributed system, and/or across a network such as the Internet with other systems by way of the signal).
It is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the processes disclosed herein in an example of exemplary approaches. Based upon design preferences, it is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the processes may be rearranged while remaining within the scope of the present disclosure. The accompanying method claims present elements of the various steps in sample order, and are not meant to be limited to the specific order or hierarchy presented.
Moreover, various aspects or features described herein can be implemented as a method, apparatus, or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques. The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device, carrier, or media. For example, computer-readable media can include but are not limited to magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips, etc.), optical discs (e.g., compact disc (CD), digital versatile disc (DVD), etc.), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EPROM), card, stick, key drive, etc.). Additionally, various storage media described herein can represent one or more devices and/or other machine-readable media for storing information. The term “machine-readable medium” can include, without being limited to, wireless channels and various other media capable of storing, containing, and/or carrying instruction(s) and/or data.
Those skilled in the art will further appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, methods and algorithms described in connection with the examples disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, methods and algorithms have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/218,605 which was filed Jun. 19, 2009 and which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4246638 | Thomas | Jan 1981 | A |
4351982 | Miller et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4658093 | Hellman | Apr 1987 | A |
4704610 | Smith et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4779224 | Moseley et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4796220 | Wolfe | Jan 1989 | A |
4891503 | Jewell | Jan 1990 | A |
5210795 | Lipner et al. | May 1993 | A |
5235642 | Wobber et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239166 | Graves | Aug 1993 | A |
5241594 | Kung | Aug 1993 | A |
5291598 | Grundy | Mar 1994 | A |
5414269 | Takahashi | May 1995 | A |
5418854 | Kaufman et al. | May 1995 | A |
5440635 | Bellovin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5490216 | Richardson, III | Feb 1996 | A |
5666415 | Kaufman | Sep 1997 | A |
5745879 | Wyman | Apr 1998 | A |
5754763 | Bereiter | May 1998 | A |
5790664 | Coley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5925127 | Ahmad | Jul 1999 | A |
5974150 | Kaish et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6009401 | Horstmann | Dec 1999 | A |
6041411 | Wyatt | Mar 2000 | A |
6044471 | Colvin | Mar 2000 | A |
6158005 | Bharathan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6230199 | Revashetti et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233567 | Cohen | May 2001 | B1 |
6243468 | Pearce et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6294793 | Brunfeld et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6330608 | Stiles | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330670 | England et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6418472 | Mi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449645 | Nash | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6536005 | Augarten | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6785825 | Colvin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6826690 | Hind et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6859793 | Lambiase | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6920567 | Doherty et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6976009 | Tadayon et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7032110 | Su et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7069440 | Aull | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069595 | Cognigni et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7082535 | Norman et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7085741 | Lao et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100195 | Underwood | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7178025 | Scheidt et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188241 | Cronce et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203966 | Abburi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206765 | Gilliam et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7272728 | Pierson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7305562 | Bianco et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7310813 | Lin et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319987 | Hoffman et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7327280 | Bachelder et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337147 | Chen et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343297 | Bergler et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7418665 | Savage | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7463945 | Kiesel et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7653899 | Lindahi et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7836121 | Elgressy et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8171287 | Villela | May 2012 | B2 |
8327448 | Eldar et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20010034712 | Colvin | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044782 | Hughes et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020019814 | Ganesan | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020065097 | Brockenbrough et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082997 | Kobata et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091937 | Ortiz | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020161718 | Coley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030065918 | Willey | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097331 | Cohen | May 2003 | A1 |
20030156719 | Cronce et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172035 | Cronce et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182428 | Li et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040024860 | Sato et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030912 | Merkle, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049685 | Jaloveczki | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059929 | Rodgers et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040107360 | Herrmann et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117321 | Sancho | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143746 | Ligeti et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148601 | Kroening | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172531 | Little et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172558 | Callahan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177255 | Hughes | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187018 | Owen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050034115 | Carter et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050108173 | Stefik et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138155 | Lewis | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050166263 | Nanopoulos et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172280 | Ziegler et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050213768 | Durham et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050265446 | Elgressy et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268087 | Yasuda et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278542 | Pierson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005237 | Kobata et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036766 | Baupin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064756 | Ebert | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072444 | Engel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080534 | Yeap et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085310 | Mylet et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060090070 | Bade et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095454 | Shankar et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060161914 | Morrison et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168580 | Harada et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060265337 | Wesinger, Jr. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265446 | Elgressy et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282511 | Takano et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070061566 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078785 | Bush et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070113090 | Villela | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124689 | Weksel | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143408 | Daigle | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143838 | Milligan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168288 | Bozeman | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174633 | Draper et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198422 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203846 | Kavuri et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070207780 | McLean | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070209064 | Qin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219917 | Liu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070260883 | Giobbi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282615 | Hamilton et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080052775 | Sandhu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065552 | Elazar et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086423 | Waites | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097924 | Carper et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104683 | Nagami et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120195 | Shakkarwar | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120707 | Ramia | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147556 | Smith et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152140 | Fascenda | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177997 | Morais et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228578 | Mashinsky | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242405 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261562 | Jwa et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268815 | Jazra et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080289025 | Schneider | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080320607 | Richardson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090019536 | Green et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090083730 | Richardson | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083833 | Ziola et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090113088 | Illowsky et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119744 | Lange et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132813 | Schibuk | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138643 | Charles et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138975 | Richardson | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158396 | Baum et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20030125975 | Ortiz | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
678985 | Jun 1997 | AU |
1637958 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1637961 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1670188 | Jun 2006 | EP |
2312483 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2323062 | May 2011 | EP |
2355322 | Apr 2001 | GB |
2434724 | Aug 2007 | GB |
WO 9209160 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 9220022 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9301550 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9535533 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 0058895 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0067095 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0190892 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 03032126 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 2004054196 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2005104686 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO2007060516 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2008013504 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008127431 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008157639 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO2009039504 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO2009065135 | May 2009 | WO |
WO2009076232 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2009105702 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO2009143115 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO2009158525 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2011032605 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
NIKON; Nikon Coolpix S52/S52c User's Manual; Apr. 21, 2008. |
Jasen et al.; Assigning and Enforcing Security Policies on handheld devices; Journal Article; 2000, pp. 1-8. |
Housley et al., “Internet ×.509 Public Key Infracstructure Certificate and CRL Profile,” The Internet Society, Network Working Group, 1999, 75 pages [RFC 2459]. |
Muncaster et al., “Continous Multimodal Authentication Using Dynamic Baysian Networks,” Second Workshop on Multimodal User Authentication, Toulouse, France, May 11-12, 2006. XP55003041. |
Sim et al. “Continous Verification Using Multimodal Biometrics”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 29, No. 4, Apr. 1, 2007, IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 687-700. XP011168507. |
Williams, R., “A Painless Guide to CRC Error Detection Algorithms”, Ver. 3, Aug. 19, 1993. |
Angha, F. et al., “Securing Transportation Network Infrastructure with Patented Technology of Device Locking—Developed by Uniloc USA”, avail. at: http://www.dksassociates.com/admin/paperfile/ITS%20World%20Paper%20Submission—Uniloc%20—2—.pdf, Oct. 24, 2006. |
Econolite, “Econolite and Uniloc Partner to Bring Unmatched Infrastructure Security to Advanced Traffic Control Networks with Launch of Strongpoint”, avail. at: http://www.econolite.com/docs/press/20080304—Econolite—StrongPoint.pdf, Mar. 4, 2008. |
Johnson et al. “Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks,” Mobile Computing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996. |
David J-L, “Cookieless Data Persistence in Possible,” Apr. 23, 2003, Internet Article retrieved on Sep. 21, 2010. XP002603490. |
Iovation, “Using Reputation of Devices to Detect and Prevent Online Retail Fraud,” White Paper, Apr. 2007. |
Iovation, “Controlling High Fraud Risk of International Transactions,” Iovation Reputation Services, White Paper, May 2007. |
Posting from Slashdot on the article “Smart Cards for Windows XP Login” Comment “Re: PIN” posted Dec. 3, 2001. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Two-factor—authentication&ildid=216794321. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100325704 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61218605 | Jun 2009 | US |