Patent Grant
8290824
The present invention relates to a system and method that facilitates e-commerce volume pricing.
The buying and selling of goods and services (collectively referred to as “products”) has resulted in a vast array of costing schemes which are used to select the price at which such products are sold.
One of the most common costing schemes which consumers encounter everyday is known as fixed pricing. According to this costing scheme, sellers set a fixed price for their products based on a past demand for the product and/or anticipated future demand. Buyers desiring to purchase products from the seller are each required to pay the same fixed price regardless of the number of products purchased. If a seller finds that the demand for a given product is greater or less than expected, the seller can later adjust the fixed price of the product to account for such findings. Although the fixed pricing provides a simple way for a seller to conduct business with multiple buyers, one drawback of this costing scheme is that it fails to reward buyers willing to purchase greater quantities of products.
Another common costing scheme for pricing a product is an auction. In an auction, a seller sets an initial price for an item and then multiple buyers are given an opportunity to bid against each other for the product. The buyer having placed the highest bid for the product at the end of the auction purchases the product at the final price bid. Although auctions provide advantages when selling unique products for which customers are willing to competitively bid, the auction forum is not well suited for sellers desiring to sell large quantities of goods to multiple buyers given the inherent inefficiencies involved with selling one product at a time in a bidding environment.
Yet another costing scheme, which has been advanced in recent years, is buyer-driven bidding. According to this costing scheme, a single buyer desiring to obtain a product communicates a price at which the buyer is willing to purchase the product to multiple sellers. Each of the sellers is provided an opportunity to review the buyer's price. A sale is complete when one of the sellers agrees to sell the product to the buyer at the price suggested by the buyer. While the buyer-driven bidding scheme provides advantages for certain types of transactions when, for example, sellers may be willing to sell products at lower than normal prices, the uncertainties involved with whether a buyer's offer will be accepted is often problematic for high volume commercial transactions in which the reliability that a transaction will be complete is of paramount importance.
While the costing schemes described above have various advantages and disadvantages in different situations, a commonality among all of the costing schemes is that each buyer operates independently with one or more sellers to set a purchase price of a product in low volume transactions. Accordingly, there is a strong need in the art for a volume costing scheme which overcomes the above-mentioned drawbacks and others.
The following presents a simplified summary of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention. It is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of the invention nor delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a system and method that facilitates e-commerce volume pricing is provided. The e-commerce volume pricing system and methodology is structured to provide incentive for buyers to work together when purchasing products. By working together, buyers are able to take advantage of lower pricing due to quantity discounts. To facilitate buying and selling products using the e-commerce volume pricing system and methodology, an electronic forum is provided whereby buyers and sellers are able to conveniently exchange information and order products.
Thus, according to one aspect of the present invention, system for facilitating volume pricing is provided. The system includes an offers and orders component that receives and aggregates orders for a product from a plurality of buyers. The system also includes a logistics component that determines a shipping price for the product for a subset of the plurality of buyers. The shipping price is determined at least in part upon the subset of buyers sharing a shipping method.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a method of costing is provided. The method includes electronically offering a product for sale, receiving a first order for the product from a first set of buyers at a first price, and receiving a second order for the product from a second set of buyers at a second price. A total quantity of products ordered from the first set of buyers and the second set of buyers is calculated and the first order is filled at a third price and the second order is filled at a fourth price, the third and fourth prices being based upon the total quantity of products ordered.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method of costing is provided. The method includes electronically offering a product for sale by a seller and receiving orders for the product from a plurality of buyers. A final price is determined for the product based upon the total quantity of products ordered from the plurality of buyers and the final price is then compared to a contract price between the seller and at least one of the plurality of buyers. If the final price is less than the contract price, the orders are filled for all of the plurality of buyers at the final price. However, if the final price is greater than the contract price, the orders for the at least one of the plurality of buyers is filled at the contract price and the orders for the other of the plurality of buyers is filled at the final price.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a method of costing is provided. The method includes electronically offering a product for sale, receiving a first order for the product from a first set of buyers at a first price, and receiving a second order for the product from a second set of buyers at a second price. Third and fourth prices are determined for the first set of buyer and the second set of buyers, respectively, based upon the total quantity of products ordered. It is then determined whether the third price is less than a contract price between a seller and at least one of the first set of buyers. If the third price is not less than the contract price, the orders are filled for at least one of the first set of buyers at the contract price, the other of the first set of buyers at the third price, and the second set of buyers at the fourth price. Otherwise, the orders are filled at the third price for the first set of buyers and at the fourth price for the second set of buyers.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention a volume pricing system is provided which includes a server configured to receive orders for a product from a plurality of different buyers via at least one remote computer system. The server includes a processor, a memory coupled to the processor, and a network interface coupled to the processor for transmitting and receiving data with the at least one remote computer system. The memory is utilized to store a first price schedule and a second price schedule, the first price schedule operable to determine a first price for the product for at least one of the plurality of different buyers and the second price schedule operable to determine a second price for the product for the other plurality of different buyers.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method of costing is provided. The method includes electronically offering a product for sale in accordance with a price schedule, the price schedule setting a price for the product which varies in accordance with a quantity of the product ordered and receiving orders for the product from a plurality of different buyers. The total quantity of products ordered from the plurality of different buyers is calculated. A shipping price is then determined from at least one of the plurality of different buyers sharing a shipping method with at least another of the plurality of different buyers. A final price for the product is determined from the price schedule based on the total quantity of products ordered and the determined shipping price and the orders are filled for the plurality of different buyers at the final price.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a data packet is provided. The data packet is adapted to be transmitted between two or more computer processes and includes, one or more first fields adapted to store at least one pricing structure for a product, one or more second fields adapted to store orders from a plurality of buyers for the product, and one or more third fields adapted to store a final price for the product based upon the total quantity of products ordered from the plurality of buyers or a Not To Exceed (NTE) contract price between the seller and at least one of the plurality of buyers.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the invention then, comprises the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of the invention. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed and the present invention is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents. Other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
In the annexed drawings:
The present invention is now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It may be evident, however, that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block form in order to facilitate describing the present invention.
Referring initially to
Each of the buyers 15 and sellers 20 can access the central server 25 in any of a variety of ways. For example, each buyer 15 and seller 20 is shown to be part of separate establishments 30 which include one or more respective computer systems 35 and local servers 40. The computer systems 35 can, for example, be a desktop or laptop computer with a local area network (LAN) interface for communicating over a network backbone 45 to the local server 40. The local servers 40, in turn, interface with the central server 25 via a network cable 50 or the like. It will be appreciated that while the computer system 35 is depicted as communicating with the central server 25 via hardwired network connections, alternatively, the computer system 35 can interface with the central server 25 using a modem, wireless local area and/or wide area networks, etc. Further, it will be appreciated, that while the buyers 15 and sellers 20 are shown to communicate with the central server 25 via different computer systems 35, it will be appreciated that the buyers 15 and/or sellers 20 can access the central server 25 from the same computer system 25.
As used in this application, the terms “component” and “module” are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component and/or module may be, but is not limited to, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a server and the server can be a component and/or module.
The underlying architecture of the software system used to provide buyers and sellers with a forum for conducting business is created as a collection of components. Component-based architecture allows separate sections of code to stand alone from one another, thus allowing for easier replacement, debugging, removal, updating, etc. Components also allow multiple users to work independently on separate components without interference from other components. For example, a component could be reprogrammed to enhance its speed without necessitating the recoding of half of the system as might be required in a non-component based system. Furthermore, custom components can be developed for specific customers based upon the requirements of the customers. Such components can be further customized to interact directly with the customers' systems. The component-based system also has the ability to recognize when two or more users are simultaneously making changes to a component or module. Thus, the system can accommodate for the simultaneous changes to mitigate any problems that might occur. For example, a locking or change comparison process can prevent a first user from writing over new data, entered by a second user, with old data.
The kernel component is the central component in the operating system. Typically, the kernel is responsible for memory management, process and task management, and disk management. In the present invention, the kernel component is divided into twelve functional modules. However, it is to be appreciated that the number of modules is not essential to the invention. Thus, a kernel containing more or less than twelve modules, which performs the functions as described herein, is contemplated as falling within the scope of the present invention.
The first module is an offers and orders module, which manages the offers and orders for products, such as posting, processing, storing, etc. The second module is a catalog module, which manages seller catalogs, product categories, and products. The third module is a users and groups module. This module allows for the storage, creation, editing, and deletion of users and groups and will generally be used by the deal rooms. The fourth module, an access control module, is responsible for enabling users and groups to see what they have been authorized to see and similarly, perform the tasks that they have been authorized to perform.
The fifth module is a messaging module, which allows various module functions to be invoked by the user interface and/or remote integrated systems. The messaging functionality may also be embedded into other modules. The sixth module is a terms and conditions module, which manages agreements between parties involved in each transaction, such as the terms and conditions agreed to between buyer and seller, buyer and system administrator, seller and system administrator, etc. The seventh module is a blanket pricing module. This module manages agreements between buyers and sellers as to product prices. The eighth module, a product relationships module, allows sellers to create relationships between related products. The ninth module is a logistics module, which allows for the management of the product shipment. A RFQ/RFO/RFP module manages quote, offer, and product requests. The eleventh module is an invoicing module, which manages administrative functions, such as record keeping, invoicing, credit checks, etc. Finally, an agents module is used to automate routine tasks and/or to provide decision support and guidelines.
Modules allow for greater flexibility and customization since they can be enabled or disabled for the entire system on a user-by-user, group-by-group, access point-by-access point basis. The purpose of allowing the enabling and disabling of modules is necessary because there may be some modules that a user does not require or is not licensed to use. Furthermore, modules may need to be disabled for maintenance, troubleshooting, or upgrading. Function enabling/disabling is designed to allow the system administrator or host to prevent user access to certain features. It is to be further noted that functions within one module can be dependent upon functions in another module. Thus, modules are able to communicate amongst each other. It is possible that modules may reside on separate servers, thus allowing the system to easily handle increases in volume.
The offers and orders module contains the logic necessary to perform functions in relation to offers and orders, such as creating, storing, editing, and deleting. This module can also manage options, smart offers, shopping carts, multiple line item orders, derived offers, the offer finder, order approval, commit-at-price orders, quote generation, multiple line item quotes, discounts, gift certificates/merchandise credits, and other related functions.
Offers are typically made to present product options to a buyer. Pricing for offers can be in terms of percent markup/markdown, flat fee/savings, fee-per-item/savings-per-item, or aggregate options. Two types of offers are available: single offers and aggregate offers. A single offer is one in which the final price of a product is determined by an individual buyer. The price can be dependent upon the volume of product that the individual buyer is purchasing or can be contractually negotiated between the seller and the individual buyer. On a single offer, once a final price has been determined and the individual buyer has placed an order, the offer is considered closed. However, it is possible for a buyer involved in a single offer transaction to benefit from an aggregate offer. For example, a buyer can require an earlier ship date than the date offered in the aggregate offer, thus the buyer can request a single offer from the seller. If the seller can manufacture the products ordered in the single offer in the same lot as the products ordered in the aggregate order, the seller can pass on the cost benefits in the single offer as well as in the aggregate offer.
An aggregate offer is one in which the final price of a product is determined by a plurality of buyers. The plurality of buyers can consist of individual buyers and/or purchasing groups. The plurality of buyers can place orders through an aggregation aware system, as described herein, as well as through a non-aggregation aware system. Generally, the net volume of product ordered by the plurality of buyers determines the final price of the product. A seller can provide a pricing structure/price curve or an equation to detail how the price of the product changes with the volume ordered. Additionally, or alternatively, the price of the product can change with respect to the time remaining on an open offer. For example, the seller can discount the product by 25% during the last five days of the offer or the price can be programmed to regularly drop by a percentage throughout the time period of the offer until a hidden price point is reached. Other factors which can affect the product pricing strategy include: market conditions, time remaining before shipment, the number of current orders on an offer, the quantity of product still available, and the number of buyers currently participating in the offer.
The final price for the product is not calculated until the order close date, which can be extended by the seller up until the ship date. Thus, based on the cumulative orders received at the end of an “open session” period, a seller can provide all buyers with the same quantity discount for the product regardless of what the price of the product was at the time each buyer placed the order. Therefore, each buyer is able to benefit from other buyers ordering the same product since the cumulative orders received at the end of the open session determines the price for all buyers placing orders during the open session. If a buyer cancels an order or reduces the quantity of the order, the seller maintains the final aggregate price as to the rest of the buyers. Alternatively, the seller can specify in his terms and conditions that the seller preserves the right to change the pricing structure, which can, in some instances, hold the buyer to a higher price than the buyer had originally agreed to. If the buyer cancels in either of the aforementioned situations, the buyer can be subject to a cancellation or penalty fee at the discretion of the seller. In both situations, when the buyer cancels or changes the order quantity, the cancelled or changed quantity can be immediately made available to the other buyers in the deal room.
However, the final price determined at the close of an open session period will not necessarily be the same for each buyer or group of buyers that participated in the aggregate offer. For example, the buyer and seller can have an agreement in which the seller has agreed that the buyer will not pay above a certain amount, a NOT TO EXCEED (NTE) price, for a product or order. Thus, if the aggregate final price is greater than the contract price between the buyer and seller, the buyer will only pay the agreed upon NTE price. This NTE price can be contracted to be available to an individual order, a predetermined quantity of orders, or any orders placed within a particular time frame. The contract between the parties can further specify that the NTE price can change automatically based upon the length of the relationship between the parties and/or the amount of volume the buyer places with the seller over time. Moreover, an individual buyer's NTE price can remain in effect for the individual although the individual is ordering as a member of a purchasing group.
Another instance in which the final price determined at the close of an aggregate offer can vary for each buyer or group of buyers is when one or more buyers take advantage of coupons and/or discounts offered by the seller. Such coupons and/or discounts can be applied to the aggregate final price, thus allowing the holder of the coupon and/or discount to receive a lower price than other buyers within the aggregate group. For example, a seller can award a discount to an individual buyer within a group for being the most significant contributor to the group's buying power. Thus, the final product price for the group is $4.00, but the price to the individual buyer within the group is $3.50. Coupons and/or discounts can take the form of a percentage off the final price, a pre-negotiated flat fee, step discount prices tied to volume, etc. Coupons and/or discounts will be given for a variety of reasons, such as: the length of the relationship between the buyer and seller; the order volume the buyer has placed with the seller; the seller's need to reduce inventory; the seller's need to sell product more rapidly; and any other reason desired by the seller. For example, if a buyer promises to buy product A from the seller exclusively for one year, the seller can afford the buyer a 5% discount off the final price. As an additional example, if a buyer registers to be part of a particular purchasing group for the next six months, the seller can afford the buyer a 5% discount off the group price.
Thus, according to one aspect of the present invention, a volume pricing methodology is shown with respect to
At 70, the system determines whether any of the plurality of buyers has a NTE price contract with the seller. If yes, at 72, the system determines whether the NTE price is lower than the calculated final price based upon the aggregation. If the NTE price is lower, the buyer(s) will receive the NTE price (74). If the NTE price is higher, the buyer(s) will receive the final aggregated price (76). If the buyers do not have a NTE price contract with the seller, the NTE price determination is skipped. At 78, the system determines whether the buyer is eligible to receive a coupon and/or discount from the seller. If yes, the coupon and/or discount are applied to the buyer's final price (80), the final price being either the calculated price based on the aggregation or the NTE price. Otherwise, no additional discount is given to the buyer(s) (82). Thus, although all the buyers are participating in an aggregated offer for the same product, the final price amongst the participating buyers can be different.
Furthermore, buyers within an aggregate group can be subject to different pricing structures, or price curves, for the same product. For example, a seller can access information about the buyers past purchasing history, such as the number or percentage of cancelled orders, on-time payments, and/or the number of orders the particular buyer has placed through the system. This information can be viewed in terms of the buyer's history with that particular seller, all sellers, that particular product or product category, or all products. Based on these criteria, a ranking is assigned to the buyer either manually or by default criteria set by the seller. This ranking can then determine the pricing structure that the buyer receives for a particular product. For instance, a buyer with a 100% rate of taking receipt of all orders online and 100% of paying within 30 days would be assigned a high ranking of AA. When this buyer returned to the site and entered a password, the AA rating would be denoted and a certain pricing structure would be made available to that buyer for placing an aggregate order. Likewise, a buyer with a low CC ranking could see a pricing structure with a 5% premium, simply based on their password and past performance. Additionally, a buyer can be grouped into a specific pricing structure according to the buyer's current or historical product volume consumption. Generally, a buyer within an aggregate group will only have access to view the pricing structures applicable that individual buyer, and not to other buyers within the same group. Movement between groups is possible for individual buyers upon achieving different ratings and/or volume consumption.
One method of achieving the aforementioned pricing strategy is shown with respect to
Alternatively, the seller can divide the capacity between the two deal rooms. Thus, in the example above, if the seller plans to produce 5000 pieces of product A, the seller can configure both deal room 1 and deal room 2 with 2500 pieces of product A. Thus, if a buyer places an order for 1000 pieces in deal room 1, the available quantity in deal room 1 becomes 1500 pieces, and the available quantity in deal room 2 remains at 2500 pieces. However, buyers participating in both deal rooms are still afforded the advantage of the demand aggregation on 5000 pieces. Throughout the open offer period, the seller maintains the ability to modify various aspects of the offer as deemed necessary. In the last example, if the seller is receiving significantly more activity in deal room 1 than in deal room 2, the seller can reduce the available capacity in deal room 2 by 1500 pieces and add that 1500 pieces to deal room 1. Thus, changing the available quantity in deal room 1 to 3000 pieces and the available quantity in deal room 2 to 1000 pieces. Similarly, the seller can opt to close deal room 2 prematurely and apply the entire available capacity to deal room 1. Sellers are only limited in their modification rights to the extent that any of the buyers would be disadvantaged. Furthermore, any modifications made to a deal room is done in real time; thus, allowing buyers to view the most up to date information at any time.
Two or more sellers of the same product can also utilize the aforementioned method of employing multiple deal rooms with multiple pricing structures. For example, both a manufacturer and a distributor can be engaged in selling the same products through the system. Since the manufacturer is supplying the distributor with the products, the manufacturer will realize production efficiencies in aggregating product volume between the both the manufacturer's deal rooms and the distributor's deal rooms. Thus, all parties involved in the transaction will realize cost benefits.
Moreover, a manufacturer and a distributor of the same product can take advantage of an auto post feature in the system. This feature will immediately post an open offer in the distributor's deal room upon the manufacturer posting an open offer in the manufacturer's deal room. This process includes a distributor receiving a list of products that will be offered in the deal room by the manufacturer. This list is tagged by the distributor to have these products automatically populate in the distributor's deal room along with the requisite lead-time (e.g., a three day difference) between the distributor's receipt of the product and the ship date posted to the buyers.
The distributor can also specify the price breaks to be added above those provided by the manufacturer (i.e., a starting price of $65/1000 pieces submitted by the manufacturer shows as 125% of that price/same volume to the distributor's customers). The figure applied can be a multiple (1.25), a percentage (125%), set price ($85), etc. along with the requisite price breaks or a flat price and all other information. The system provides the benefit of automatically posting open offers downstream from one deal room to another. Likewise, there can be multiple segments within one deal room based on different customer segments. For example, upon a manufacturer posting an offer in a deal room, three different deal rooms can open for the distributor for three different groups of buyers. The first deal room can specify 125% of the manufacturer's price and a lead-time of three days from the manufacturer's ship date; the second deal room can specify 110% of the manufacturer's price and a lead-time of three days from the manufacturer's ship date; and the third deal room can specify 105% of the manufacturer's price and a lead-time of two days from the manufacturer's ship date. In addition, or in the alternative, other features can also be varied within the different deal rooms, such as pay options and product options. It is to be appreciated that the auto post feature can be used by a plurality of sellers with related products and is not limited to a manufacturer and distributor relationship.
The feature described above can also work in the opposite direction with a distributor placing an order that triggers a single or aggregated offer from a manufacturer. For instance, a distributor in a family of regionally dispersed distributors has an order for 10,000 units of a product that is needed in five weeks. The distributor can request this order be an aggregated offer posted to the rest of their divisions/deal room participants for aggregation. An open offer is triggered by this request with any price breaks that have been predetermined by the manufacturer. The manufacturer can have an automatic check feature, which can check if the offer is already posted and alert the distributor. The automatic check feature can also check to see whether the offer is within a time frame specified by the manufacturer, whether any options are included in the offer, whether capacity is available to post the offer. Furthermore, a message can be sent directly to the manufacturer's messaging system for a confirmation request before it is posted as an open offer.
Once this open offer is posted, it will automatically have the requested amount specified by the distributor baseloaded within the offer, and other distributors are notified of the purchasing opportunity. Another offer can automatically populate in the distributor's deal room for their buyers as well. Moreover, the manufacturer can request that another open offer be created in a different deal room at a different pricing structure. For example, a large distributor with access to the trigger functionality requests and posts automatically an aggregated offer from a supplier. This open offer is then baseloaded with the order and presented to the rest of the buyers within that section of the deal room. As more buyers order, the price drops accordingly. The trigger function automatically populates a second open offer to other deal rooms provided by the manufacturer. The pricing structures and quantities can be predetermined in the system and can be changed at any time. A confirmation function can be engaged which requests that the manufacturer validate the option of posting the offer in another deal room.
Buyers also have the ability to rank the performance of any sellers with whom they have transacted. Sellers can be ranked on criteria such as, on-time delivery, quality of goods, communication, and response time to Requests for Quote (RFQ), Requests for Offers (RFO), and Requests for Product (RFP). Both buyers and sellers can allow other buyers and sellers to view their respective rankings. In addition, buyers and sellers are afforded the opportunity to leave feedback to a buyer or seller in response to a transaction between the parties. Such feedback can be available to the entire user community, thus affording a new buyer the opportunity to view a particular seller's on-time delivery history prior to placing an order with that seller.
An aggregate offer can have a fixed minimum order quantity or a variable minimum order quantity. In an offer that contains a variable minimum order quantity, a seller can fluctuate the minimum quantity that an individual buyer must order as the total aggregate order changes. For example, an offer can be established to automatically decrease the minimum order quantity from 500 pieces to 100 pieces as soon as the total aggregate order quantity reaches 5000 pieces. Then again, an offer can be created in which no minimum order quantity is required; however, the seller retains the right to cancel the entire order if the quantity does not reach a predetermined level by a specified date and time. Minimum order quantities can be specified per shipping location. This allows sellers to take advantage of shipping aggregation for different ship points.
The system also has the ability to automatically suggest or create offers based on history or user specifications. These offers can be time or quantity dependent. For example, the system automatically opens an offer for a specified product every two weeks or every time 1000 units of a product are ordered, the order closes and a new order for that product is opened. Offers can also be created automatically based upon a purchasing agreement between a buyer and seller for guaranteed acceptance of product orders throughout a predetermined time period. Thus, the seller can post planned inventory in advance. For example, if a buyer agrees to accept shipment of 100 racks of glass the first week of every month for the next six months, the seller then posts the availability of an additional 50 racks of the same glass for the same week. The original buyer provides a base that absorbs much of the fixed costs associated with the schedule while the incremental 50 racks represents proper capacity utilization at much higher profit margins.
Buyers have the ability to create conditional orders for a product. Conditional orders are created, for example, when a buyer agrees to place an order if the price drops below a specified level or if the aggregation reaches a certain percentage discount. If, or when, the condition is met, the buyer's order will be automatically placed by the system. Furthermore, the system will recognize when two or more conditional orders can be combined to perfect the condition and thus, place these orders. For example, buyer 1 wants to buy X units of a product if it falls below $5 and buyer 2 wants to buy Y units of the same product if it falls below $5. If quantity X plus quantity Y plus any quantity currently on order is enough to bring the price below $5, both buyer 1's and buyer 2's orders will be placed.
In view of the foregoing features described herein, exemplary web pages in accordance with various aspects of the present invention will be better appreciated with reference to
Turning now to
Turning now to
The product category page 150 includes the category name 170 and a brief description of the category 175. A list of the product's subcategories 180, if available, is shown with hyperlinks 185 to each of the product subcategory's pages (not shown). The product subcategory page is similar in structure and content to the product category page 150. A section containing a summary of products available under the product category is shown. This section includes information such as, the name of the product 190, whether the product has any open offers, aggregate 195 or single 200, how many open offers are available for each product, and a hyperlink 210 to the product details web page. If any open offers exist for this particular product category, a section with a summary of the open offers will be shown. This section can be split into a summary of the open single offers 215 and a summary of the open aggregate offers 220. This open offer summary includes information such as: the product name 225, a hyperlink 230 to an offer details web page, the shipping terms 235, the price 240, the shipping date 245, and a hyperlink 250 to a seller sponsored deal room. Shipping terms are included in both single and aggregate offers and are typically Free On Board (FOB) terms. However, other shipping terms can be provided, such as FAS, CIF, C&F, or any other applicable shipping term. The hyperlink 250 to the supplier sponsored deal room allows a buyer to place an order in connection with one of the offers.
The product categories menu 155 can also link the user to a catalog (not shown). The catalog can be viewed and arranged by product type, by seller, and/or by pricing. Sellers have the option of blocking access to any or all of their product listings from specified system users. Sellers can also create custom templates for ease of adding a new product listing. A default template is also available by the system host for this purpose. The product listings in the catalog contain details about each product, including the manufacturer/distributor, default pricing and/or price curve, any available options and/or customizations, minimum order quantities, ship terms and links to related products. The catalog can also be accessed through alternate means, such as the search function, the favorites menu, the user's homepage, etc.
An example of a product details web page 260 is shown in
Turning now to
Based on the above information, if a buyer desires to place an order, the buyer selects an ‘order’ icon 350, displayed within the deal room, to continue the purchasing process. Alternatively, if the buyer is interested in the offer, but does not yet wish to place an order, the buyers can select a ‘watch this offer’ hyperlink 355 displayed within the deal room. The offer can then appear on a web page, such as the buyer's homepage, in which all of the buyer's watched offers will be displayed. Moreover, the system can be prompted to notify the buyer of any activity that can occur with respect to that particular offer. Furthermore, if the buyer has any questions about the offer, the buyer can choose the ‘contact seller’ hyperlink 360. This hyperlink 360 will direct the buyer to the seller's email, or messaging, screen.
If the order icon is selected, the buyer is then directed to an order web page 380, as shown in
The order page also contains an entry field 400 for a coupon or discount code. These codes are uniquely recorded by the system, thus providing that the buyer will not use the coupon or discount more than intended. Coupons or discounts can expire based on the number of times used, the date, and/or the order quantity. The system also supports an accruing discount function. This allows sellers to offer automatic discounts to buyers who achieve purchasing milestones. The number of units purchased, total dollar volume, total orders placed, and/or total time spent buying online can specify these milestones. Similarly, an entry field 405 for a gift certificate or merchandise credit code is provided on the order page (
Once the buyer has completed the order entry, the buyer selects a ‘continue’ icon 415. At this point, if the system determines that the buyer is not logged in, the system will require the buyer enter a login name and password, or alternatively, complete a registration process, such as that shown in
If the buyer is registered and logged into the system, he/she will be directed to an order confirmation page (not shown). Here the details of the order are shown and the buyer has the option of confirming, modifying, or canceling the order. If the buyer confirms, the order is placed with the seller or the order is sent to a shopping cart. Shopping carts can be seller specific. Thus, the buyer can have more than one shopping cart active simultaneously. It is to be appreciated that shopping carts can also be organized by product category. Moreover, the buyer can only have one shopping cart active that contains all orders made by the buyer. Shopping carts will typically be emptied once a buyer logs out of the system. However, a buyer has the option of saving the shopping cart for later verification. While orders are active within a shopping cart, the deal room can show the order quantity as on hold. Line items within the shopping cart based upon offers that have already closed will be considered invalid and ignored by the system. A shopping cart can also be created to save quotes received from a seller.
However, the system can determine that the order cannot be confirmed. An alert system can be employed to notify the buyer that the order, as placed, exceeds the buyer's authority. This can occur if the buyer is configured within the system to have limited purchasing authority. For instance, the buyer may only be permitted to order specified products, to remain within an account spending limit, and/or to not exceed a certain dollar amount per order. The buyer's supervisor, the seller, or any other user with appropriate authority can place such limits. The system can automatically cancel the order, alert the buyer to edit the order, or to forward the order to the seller or a supervisor for authorization if the buyer exceeds his authority. If the order is awaiting authorization, the system will hold the order for a predetermined time period. Thus, the quantity available will be reduced for other buyers. The other buyers may be aware of the quantity being held, but they will not have access to the identity of the buyer for whom the product is being held. If the order is cancelled, the hold quantity is released and made available again to the other buyers.
Regarding
Regarding
The users and groups module is capable of storing users, groups, and their details, such as demographic and marketing information. For example, a buyer is presented with a catalog item to determine whether the buyer would be interested in purchasing that item, and if so, when they would next need the item and at what quantity. This information could then be used to suggest or automatically create aggregate or single offers. Users are virtual representations of the physical users of the system and/or remote systems, such as corporate purchasing servers or sales-processing servers. Groups are collections of users with specific system roles and/or rights. For example, a seller group can be granted the right to manage a particular access group and a buyer group can be granted access to a particular set of offers and the right to place orders on particular products. Furthermore, groups can be offered different pricing structures and/or product quantities than individual users for a particular product. Groups can be contained within other groups, thus creating parent-child relationships. In these relationships, child groups inherit access permissions from their respective parent groups. The system host or administrator, the seller, or the individuals within the group can determine the makeup of the groups. Although the descriptions and examples herein commonly refer to transactions between an individual buyer and an individual seller, it is to be appreciated that such transactions can also occur between one buyer and a group of sellers, a group of buyers and a group of sellers, or a group of buyers and a group of sellers.
Both users and groups are identified by a login name and password, which are chosen by the users and groups upon registration. Passwords can be stored using MD5 encryption. MD5 uses one-way functions rendering it impossible to generate the password from knowing only the MD5 hash of the password. Therefore, users and groups will be prompted to choose a question and answer pair that will be used to identify a user or group in the event that the password is forgotten. Users and groups can choose to associate identifying characteristics to their login identity, such as a company name, shipping address, billing address, company logo, and/or biography. Some or all of this information can be required if the user and/or group chooses to buy and/or sell a product.
The access control module allows item creators to specify a set of rules, or permissions, as to who can access, modify and/or use the items, wherein the term item is used to denote categories, products, offers, etc. Read permissions allow users or groups to see, but not edit, item information. Edit permissions allows users the ability to make changes to the item, as well as, to the access control information relating to that item. Relate permissions are used to give a user the ability to create parent/child relationships among items; for example, the ability to create a derived product, an offer, or to place a product in a category. Place order permissions enable one to place an order on an offer or to use a line of credit/account to place an order. System administrators, or other similarly privileged users, have override permissions, which enable them to make modifications without being subject to edit rules. Override permissions can be global or specific. Global override permissions enable one to override all edit rules anywhere on the system, while specific override permissions enable one to modify data pertaining to specified, limited areas of the system.
The messaging module includes the ability for the system to communicate with users and other integrated systems. Users are notified of any change that occurs in an offer that they are involved in, such as a price change, an opportunity for further discount, change in shipping terms, and/or when the offer has been closed. Users can also request to be notified of similar changes in offers that they are interested in but have not yet participated. Likewise, users can request to be notified if any activity occurs on a particular product or product category, such as an additional options available for a product, new products offered within the category, new open offers, RFQs, RFOs, RFPs, and/or a price changes. Messages can also be sent regarding important changes to the system in general. Furthermore, this module contains the ability to turn messages off for the entire system, individual users, groups, access points, and/or remote systems. The notification and messaging system is also integrated within other modules.
Messages can be sent through email, fax, mobile devices, instant messages, bulletin boards, and/or through a user's homepage. An example of a user's homepage 450 is shown in
The terms and conditions module handles the entry, storage, and acceptance of system-wide, access point sponsor, and seller terms and conditions. Terms and conditions can be created by using a system template or through free text entry; and relate to the terms governing the sale of the product according to which both the buyer and seller are willing to conduct business. System-wide terms and conditions are those that apply to, and must be accepted by, all users and groups participating in the system. It is possible to have one set, more than one set, or no sets of active system-wide terms and conditions. Access point sponsors can require users of their access points to agree to one or more set of terms and conditions. Sellers can require buyers, which wish to purchase from them, to accept certain terms and conditions. Sellers can have different sets of terms and conditions for different buyers. For example, a seller can have stricter set of terms and conditions for first time buyers than for those which the seller has maintained a long relationship. Likewise, any other user requiring another user to accept certain terms and conditions can tailor the terms and conditions to apply to that particular user. Moreover, buyers can also require seller to accept the buyer's terms and conditions prior to purchasing. The terms and conditions agreed to between parties are stored in the system and can be modified as necessary.
The blanket pricing module allows a seller to provide discount pricing to individual buyers and/or groups of buyers for one or more items. The system always defaults to the lowest price available to a buyer when determining the final order cost. Thus, although buyers can have multiple blanket prices for a particular product, the lowest price will always take precedence. For example, a 15% discount can yield a lower overall cost than a $5 off discount in a particular order. Blanket pricing can be indefinite, dynamic, or fixed. Indefinite blanket pricing is in effect immediately after it is entered or beginning at a specified start date and will affect all future orders until the blanket price is manually revoked. A pricing sheet or equation is employed for dynamic blanket pricing. Here, the price can increase or decrease depending upon the buyers purchasing activities. Dynamic blanket pricing can apply to one product or an entire family of products. Fixed blanket pricing gives sellers the option of setting a start date and end date for which the blanket price is effective. Alternatively, the blanket price can only be effective for a specified quantity of products.
Blanket prices can be specified as a percentage or as a specified dollar amount to be discounted from the final price. Sellers can also use stepped blanket pricing. This allows the sellers to provide the buyers with a pricing sheet that details changes in the blanket prices with order quantity and/or time. The system has the ability to recommend pricing strategies for sellers to construct better blanket pricing. These strategies include calculation routines that use a maximum discount percentage, or fixed cost, to create a step structure such that when the buyer has purchased the required amount, the average price per unit is at the desired level. For example, a seller could offer a blanket price of $15/unit with a commitment of 5000 units. Rather than assuming that the purchasing commitment will be met, the seller could structure the pricing as $20 for the first 2000 units, $18 for the next 1000 units, and finally, $8.50 for the remaining 2000 units. Thus, if the buyer purchases the entire lot, the average price of $ 15/unit is attained; otherwise the buyer simply receives a tiered discount.
The system recognizes relationships between products. A manufacturer can identify a bill of materials for a product and configure the system so that an order for a product will, in turn, trigger orders for all of the product's component parts. Alternatively, the system can present order recommendations or place RFOs or RFQs instead of actually placing the order. Byproduct relationships are also recognized by the system. Here, the system automatically creates or suggests a byproducts offer when the primary product is ordered. For example, if an order for brass fittings is placed, the system will put out an offer for brass scrap metal produced by the machining process. As more orders are placed, the offer quantity increases. Furthermore, the system can recognize when two different products produce the same byproduct. For example, if an order for brass valves is placed, instead of creating a new offer for brass scrap metal, the system will increase the quantity of the brass scrap metal offer that has already been placed as a result of the order for brass fittings.
The system also recognizes products that share certain features and/or characteristics. Thus, when opening an offer for a particular product, a seller can be alerted of the manufacturing efficiencies available if he also opens an offer for other family members of that product. These manufacturing efficiencies can be based upon decreases in machine change over time when switching from one product to another, decreases in tooling and/or raw material cost, and/or increases in operator efficiencies. Also, products and/or product families can be shared between one or more sellers. The sellers could be two distributors of the same product, a manufacturer and a distributor of the same product, two manufacturers of the same product and/or one of the aforementioned combinations of related products that can be readily substituted. Thus, if one seller does not have the capacity for a buyer's requirements, the system can suggest or automatically split the buyer's order quantity among the different sellers.
Aggregation of shipping costs can be achieved with the logistics module. Thus, on an open offer, buyers can receive the benefits of product aggregation, as well as the benefits of shipping aggregation. Buyers and sellers can choose to share shipping costs with those who share single departure and arrival points and/or with those who share a common truck route. Truck filling based aggregation uses the truck dimensions to fill the truck to a specified percentage capacity. A pricing sheet, or pricing equation, will be used to determine the savings as different capacity levels are achieved. Moreover, the system can determine whether any buyers or sellers within a specified area are having product shipped on the same day. Such area-based truck sharing supports both multiple load and delivery points. The system can further divide the shipping area into zip codes. Rules are then used to determine how to best fit the items on the trucks. Furthermore, custom truck routes can be created by the system in order to achieve the most efficient shipping schedule, which, in turn, leads to significant cost benefits. For example, a preliminary route is provided with list of intervening zip codes. The system then searches for orders that can be picked up or delivered using that route. The system can also modify the route based on other orders as long as the modified route will not detrimentally affect the overall shipping schedule. This module can be integrated with shipping companies and can, alternatively, be available as a separate service.
The RFQ and RFO functions are designed to drive orders towards aggregation whenever possible. A buyer user, agent, or process initiates a RFQ and/or a RFO to predetermined sellers or all sellers of a particular product, specifying an existing product or a description of what is desired. If a specific product is requested by the buyer through a RFQ and/or RFO to a seller, other than the seller of the specified product, that seller will only receive a general description of the product. The RFQ and/or RFO can also include other buyer requirements, such as, quantity, cost range, delivery date or date range, and/or one or more delivery points. Upon receiving the RFQ and/or RFO the seller can accept the request and reply with a corresponding quote and/or offer, or the seller can reject the request. If the request is rejected, the seller has the option of notifying the buyer which requirements the seller was not able to meet, and further, make reasonable counter-offers to the buyer. Thus, the buyer and seller have the opportunity of negotiating for a successful transaction. As an alternative to a RFQ, the buyer can employ a quote generator to view various offer and option choices. The quote generator can return the same information as a formal RFQ but may not be binding upon a seller unless that seller confirms the quote.
An RFP allows a buyer user, agent, or process to request product from one or more sellers. The request can be for a one-time offering of the particular product or can be for a regular listing of the product. The RFP can detail which characteristics of the product the buyer is interested in, which can lead to a seller suggesting a similar product that the seller currently offers through the system. The RFP can also detail information such as, how often the buyer needs the product, in what quantities, what price range, whether any options are desired, and the next need date.
The invoicing module is utilized to store and update account information, create transaction summaries and invoices, and to process account status-dependant queries, such as those necessary for account spending limits. System-to-party invoices, such as transactions fees and recurring fees (e.g., the monthly hosting cost), can be automatically created through this module. The transaction fees are structured as per-transaction fees, fixed percentage fees, or variable fees. The per-transaction fee is set so that a user is charged a predetermined fee for each transaction, regardless of the total order cost. The fixed percentage fee is based on the total order cost for each transaction. The variable fee employs a pricing sheet to specify different transaction fees at different order volumes. These fees can be applied against a seller, a buyer, or both. Recurring fees are initialized to charge a user a predetermined amount and a regular frequency. The ability to set fee start dates, end dates, and waivers are also provided by the system.
The invoicing module also manages system-to-system invoicing and party-to-party invoicing. System-to-system invoicing allows the system to notify integration partners of the amounts that they or those who access the system through them owe. Party-to-party invoicing allows sellers and buyers to manage their account online, including account spending limits. If a buyer places an order, or any other fee-required transaction, and does not maintain an account with the system or the transaction exceeds the buyers spending limit, the buyer will be prompted to pay for the transaction through a credit card, electronic check, or other immediate-approved method. If such payment cannot be secured, the transaction will be cancelled. An account can be charged over-limit fees, late fees, interest, etc. at the discretion of the account lender. The invoicing module also provides interfaces for the system users to make payments and the account lenders to post payment receipts.
The agents module employs historical data and user input data to create and/or suggest various functions to buyers and sellers. Buyers and sellers can create customized agents based on their particular needs or use system default agents. Furthermore, agents can be turned on and off individually or as a group. A seller agent assists a seller maximize production efficiencies. The seller agent system uses information from the seller's previous offers and orders, such as the total capacity of product that went unpurchased for each open offer, to determine a price curve that is most likely to maximize profits for the seller. This agent also recommends the amount of time the seller should leave his offer open, the quantities the seller should offer, what options the seller should offer, the option costs, the shipping increments, and any other information necessary to allow for the greatest efficiencies and profits. Moreover, the seller can receive recommendations on which products should be offered as an aggregate offer and which products should be offered as a single offer. Offers can be automatically created for a seller on a regularly scheduled basis or alternatively, the seller agent can use the seller's inventory levels, forecast information, and open orders to determine when the next offer should be created. The seller can require that the offer be marked for review and manual activation; or the seller can allow the agent to create and activate the order without intervention.
The agent can also look at and make suggestions based on buying trends for a particular product. For example, the agent recognizes that one particular buyer always buys a product when it falls below a certain price. The agent can then recommend to the seller that the seller enter into a NTE contract price with that buyer, thus increasing the likelihood of more orders from that buyer. Furthermore, the system can track each time a buyer reviews a particular product and recommend a pricing strategy for the buyer with respect to that product. For example, a buyer reviews the price of a product at price m, price n, and price o, and places an order at price o. This information is stored whenever the buyer returns and looks at the product. Over time, the system will calculate every price the buyer ignored and accepted, and determine a customized curve for that buyer. The seller can instruct the system to reflect price increase a certain amount above the usually ordered price, or lock in a price at that point as well, creating a contract price variation in real time. As an additional example, the system recognizes that a buyer reviews a particular product three times without placing an order. The system, then, offers a coupon and/or discount to the buyer based upon such traffic patterns and products viewed in order to entice the buyer to purchase.
The seller agent can also be employed to analyze any open deal room activities. The seller can see the number of buyers that have entered the deal room and of those buyers, how many have actually placed an order. Thus, the seller agent can suggest how the seller can modify aspects of an open deal room in response to buyer activity. The seller can choose to close the deal room early, modify the available capacity, open a new deal room for the same product at a different pricing structure, or any other modification which allows the seller to best allocate his fixed resources. Seller agents can also display the seller's relative market share versus their competition with respect to a particular category, subcategory, or product in real time. Thus, the seller can choose to modify one or more open offers in order to increase his market share percentage.
Moreover, the seller agent can be used to suggest and/or create the seller's production and/or manufacturing schedule. The agent will take into consideration historical set-up times between different products (for example, how long it takes to change over a machine when switching from product A to product B as opposed to switching from product A to product C), run efficiencies associated with each machine, percent scrap associated with each machine, percent downtime for a machine, scheduled maintenance times, operator efficiencies, and any other applicable data, to determine which machines the products should run on and in what order. The agent can also recommend the best machine operator for the job and on which shifts the job should run. Moreover, the agent can use the seller's historical data and MRP information to forecast the seller's manufacturing plan by balancing anticipated demand with available capacity.
The seller agent is also capable of interacting with a buyer. Upon request from a buyer, the agent can create blanket prices, new aggregate offers, new single offers, add an order to existing offers, and/or reply to RFQs, RFOs, and RFPs. The goal of the agent is still to achieve the highest profit margin and manufacturing efficiencies for the seller. If the buyer terms and the seller terms are conflicting, the details will be forwarded to the seller for manual review and/or inform the buyer that the terms cannot be accepted. Shipping costs, carrying costs, transaction fees, and any other fees related to an offer and/or order are considered by the seller agent. Rewards and/or penalties are created based on time, the number of buyers on an offer to date, the quantity of product sold, the current price, and the number of cancellations, if any. The rewards can be in the form of a percent discount, flat discount, or bonus items. Penalties can be in the form of a percent markup, flat markup, or one time charge, and can be automatically given to any buyer that cancels an order or reduces the order quantity.
A buyer agent considers the needs of a buyer and assists in finding the best buy for a particular product. This agent looks at previous offer and order history for all sellers or specified sellers of a product and considers past offer percent aggregation, final price achieved, carrying cost vs. aggregation savings, transaction fees, any discounts that can be applied to a particular seller, and any other applicable factor to make a suggestion as to how and where the buyer should place an order. Current market information is also taken into consideration. Thus, the agent provides a comparison between the fair market value for a product and a reasonably anticipated price that can be achieved through the aggregation system.
Similar to the seller agent, the buyer agent interacts with sellers to create an aggregate order, a single order, a RFQ, a RFO, and/or a RFP. The agent can automatically place an order or provide a suggested order to the buyer and wait for manual interaction. The buyer can set up an automated process to place recurring orders, specifying maximum costs, quantity, required receipt dates, etc. The agent can also be configured to automatically place an order when the inventory level of a buyer falls below a predetermined level. Furthermore, the agent has the ability to analyze the buyer's production schedule and determine which products are needed and when in order to achieve the best buying opportunities. Shipping costs, carrying costs, lot sizes, seller quality, potential benefits of ordering early as opposed to waiting, and any other factor important in the buyer's decision making process are also considered by the buyer agent. The seller and buyer agents described above can perform the same functions with respect to a group of sellers or a group of buyers.
Agents are also used to assist the system host or administrator. An association agent is employed to analyze buyer behavior, including searches performed, orders placed, RFOs, RFQs, RFPs, and other similar actions to improve the product category structure. The association agent also generates aggregate sales information for deal rooms, categories, subcategories, products, etc. A content processing agent provides methods that intelligently associates content with products, categories, offers, and/or access points. This agent analyzes data on buyer and seller demographics, previous purchases, and other user behavior, as described above. A publisher/portal agent interfaces with the content processing agent and either suggests or automatically processes the addition and/or removal of content on the system.
All system users can make use of an exchange agent as it is concerned with activities such as, automation of billing, payment posting, and registration. This agent is also capable of overseeing the entire exchange process to identify any problem areas or system errors. For example, the exchange agent monitors deal room activities and if any manual intervention is necessary to troubleshoot the deal room, the exchange agent alerts the system administrator, host or deal room creator.
Although many aspect of the present invention have been largely described within the context of buying and selling goods; it is to be appreciated that buyers and sellers can sponsor deal rooms/transactions to aggregate selling of and purchasing of services, such as broadband, data storage, cell phones, electricity, gas, training programs, etc. For example, a service provider can contract with a group of buyers over a period of time to realize cost efficiencies tied to their usage and/or consumption. A pricing structure can be based upon time (seconds, days, months, years, etc.) and/or the quantity of usage and/or consumption over the specified time period and will be displayed in a deal room, similar to the examples above. A buyer can then visit the deal room at any point in time to track usage and/or consumption and also, view the current price, or billing schedule in real time. The buyer can view his/her individual usage and/or consumption, as well as, the usage and/or consumption of the entire buying group for that particular service. Furthermore, as above, the curves can vary for different buyers, based upon items such as rebate schedules, discounts, amount of usage and/or consumption, and length of contract between the buyer and the seller.
The system, as described above, is functional internationally. Thus, conversions are provided by the system for language, currency, units of measure, time and date, etc. in order to comply with a particular region's standard. Users can have the option of choosing which standards they prefer when registering with the system.
With reference to
The system bus 540 can be any of several types of bus structure including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of commercially available bus architectures. The system memory includes read only memory (ROM) 550 and random access memory (RAM) 560. A basic input/output system (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computer 510, such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 550. The computer 510 further includes a hard disk drive 570, a magnetic disk drive 580, e.g., to read from or write to a removable disk 590, and an optical disk drive 600, e.g., for reading a CD-ROM disk 610 or to read from or write to other optical media. The hard disk drive 570, magnetic disk drive 580, and optical disk drive 600 are connected to the system bus 540 by a hard disk drive interface 620, a magnetic disk drive interface 630, and an optical drive interface 640, respectively. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of data, data structures, computer-executable instructions, etc. for the server computer 510. Although the description of computer-readable media above refers to a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk and a CD, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of media which are readable by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, Bernoulli cartridges, and the like, can also be used in the exemplary operating environment. A number of program modules can be stored in the drives and RAM 560, including an operating system 650, one or more application programs 660, other program modules 670, and program data 680.
A user interface provides an interface through which the central server 25 can be directly programmed or accessed. The user interface can, for example, be an alphanumeric keyboard 690 and mouse 700. Other input devices (not shown) can include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 520 through a serial port interface 710 that is coupled to the system bus 540, but can be connected by other interfaces (not shown), such as a parallel port, game port or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 720 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 540 via an interface, such as a video adapter 730. In addition to the monitor 720, computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers and printers.
The computer 510 can operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote server or client computer 740. The remote computer 740 can be a workstation, a server computer, a router, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the computer 510, although only a memory storage device 750 has been illustrated in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 510 is connected to the local network 760 through a network interface or adapter 780. When used in a WAN networking environment, the server computer 520 typically includes a modem 790, or is connected to a communications server on the LAN 760, or has other means for establishing communications over the wide area network 770, such as the Internet. The modem 790, which can be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 540 via the serial port interface 710. In a networked environment, program modules 670 depicted relative to the computer 510, or portions thereof, can be stored in the remote memory storage device 750. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers can be used.
The present invention may be implemented via object oriented programming techniques. In this case each component of the system, could be an object in a software routine or a component within an object. Object oriented programming shifts the emphasis of software development away from function decomposition and towards the recognition of units of software called “objects” which encapsulate both data and functions. Object Oriented Programming (OOP) objects are software entities comprising data structures and operations on data. Together, these elements enable objects to model virtually any real-world entity in terms of its characteristics, represented by its data elements, and its behavior represented by its data manipulation functions. In this way, objects can model concrete things like people and computers, and they can model abstract concepts like numbers or geometrical concepts.
The benefit of object technology arises out of three basic principles: encapsulation, polymorphism and inheritance. Objects hide or encapsulate the internal structure of their data and the algorithms by which their functions work. Instead of exposing these implementation details, objects present interfaces that represent their abstractions cleanly with no extraneous information. Polymorphism takes encapsulation one step further—the idea being many shapes, one interface. A software component can make a request of another component without knowing exactly what that component is. The component that receives the request interprets it and figures out according to its variables and data how to execute the request. The third principle is inheritance, which allows developers to reuse pre-existing design and code. This capability allows developers to avoid creating software from scratch. Rather, through inheritance, developers derive subclasses that inherit behaviors, which the developer then customizes to meet particular needs.
In particular, an object includes, and is characterized by, a set of data (e.g., attributes) and a set of operations (e.g., methods), that can operate on the data. Generally, an object's data is ideally changed only through the operation of the object's methods. Methods in an object are invoked by passing a message to the object (e.g., message passing). The message specifies a method name and an argument list. When the object receives the message, code associated with the named method is executed with the formal parameters of the method bound to the corresponding values in the argument list. Methods and message passing in OOP are analogous to procedures and procedure calls in procedure-oriented software environments.
However, while procedures operate to modify and return passed parameters, methods operate to modify the internal state of the associated objects (by modifying the data contained therein). The combination of data and methods in objects is called encapsulation. Encapsulation provides for the state of an object to only be changed by well-defined methods associated with the object. When the behavior of an object is confined to such well-defined locations and interfaces, changes (e.g., code modifications) in the object will have minimal impact on the other objects and elements in the system.
Each object is an instance of some class. A class includes a set of data attributes plus a set of allowable operations (e.g., methods) on the data attributes. As mentioned above, OOP supports inheritance—a class (called a subclass) may be derived from another class (called a base class, parent class, etc.), where the subclass inherits the data attributes and methods of the base class. The subclass may specialize the base class by adding code which overrides the data and/or methods of the base class, or which adds new data attributes and methods. Thus, inheritance represents a mechanism by which abstractions are made increasingly concrete as subclasses are created for greater levels of specialization.
The present invention can employ abstract classes, which are designs of sets of objects that collaborate to carry out a set of responsibilities. Frameworks are essentially groups of interconnected objects and classes that provide a prefabricated structure for a working application. It should also be appreciated that the PCM and the shared memory components could be implemented utilizing hardware and/or software, and all such variations are intended to fall within the appended claims included herein.
According to an exemplary aspect of the present invention, Java and CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) are employed to carry out the present invention. Java is an object-oriented, distributed, secure, architecture neutral language. Java provides for object-oriented design, which facilitates the clean definition of interfaces and makes it possible to provide reusable “software ICs.” Java has an extensive library of routines for copying easily with TCP/IP protocols like HTTP and FTP. Java applications can open and access objects across a network via URLs with the same ease to which programmers are accustomed to accessing a local file system.
Furthermore, Java utilizes “references” in place of a pointer model and so eliminates the possibility of overwriting memory and corrupting data. Instead of pointer arithmetic that is employed in many conventional systems, the Java “virtual machine” mediates access to Java objects (attributes and methods) in a type-safe way. In addition, it is not possible to turn an arbitrary integer into a reference by casting (as would be the case in C and C++ programs). In so doing, Java enables the construction of virus-free, tamper-free systems. The changes to the semantics of references make it virtually impossible for applications to forge access to data structures or to access private data in objects that they do not have access to. As a result, most activities of viruses are precluded from corrupting a Java system.
Java affords for the support of applications on networks. Networks are composed of a variety of systems with a variety of CPU and operating system architectures. To enable a Java application to execute anywhere on the network, a compiler generates an architecture neutral object file format—the compiled code is executable on many processors, given the presence of the Java runtime system. Thus, Java is useful not only for networks but also for single system software distribution. In the present personal computer market, application writers have to produce versions of their applications that are compatible with the IBM PC and with the Apple Macintosh. However, with Java, the same version of the application runs on all platforms. The Java compiler accomplishes this by generating byte code instructions that have nothing to do with particular computer architecture. Rather, they are designed to be both easy to interpret on any machine and easily translated into native machine code on the fly.
Being architecture neutral, the “implementation dependent” aspects of the system are reduced or eliminated. The Java virtual machine (VM) can execute Java byte codes directly on any machine to which the VM has been ported. Since linking is a more incremental and lightweight process, the development process can be much more rapid and exploratory. As part of the byte code stream, more compile-time information is carried over and available at runtime.
Thus, the use of Java in the present invention provides a server to send programs over the network as easily as traditional servers send data. These programs can display and manipulate data on a client computer. The present invention through the use of Java supports execution on multiple platforms. That is the same programs can be run on substantially all computers—the same Java program can work on a Macintosh, a Windows machine, a Sun workstation, etc. To effect such multi-platform support, a network interface and a network browser (not shown) such as Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer may be used in at least one aspect of the present invention. It should be appreciated, however, that a Java stand-alone application might be constructed to achieve a substantially equivalent result. Although the present invention is described with respect to employing Java, it will be appreciated that any suitable programming language may be employed to carry out the present invention.
An Internet browser (e.g., Netscape, Microsoft Internet Explorer) is held within the memory of the client computer. The Internet Explorer enables a user to explore the Internet and view documents from the Internet. The Internet Explorer may include client programs for protocol handlers for different Internet protocols (e.g., HTTP, FTP and Gopher) to facilitate browsing using different protocols.
It is to be appreciated that any programming methodology and/or computer architecture suitable for carrying out the present invention may be employed and are intended to fall within the scope of the hereto appended claims.
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to a certain preferred aspect or aspects, equivalent alterations and modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon reading and understanding this specification and the annexed drawings. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described components (systems, assemblies, systems, etc.), the terms used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component which performs the specified function of the described component (i.e., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary aspect or aspects of the invention. In addition, while a particular feature of the invention may have been described above with respect to only one of several aspects, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other aspects, as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising”.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/324,391, entitled E-COMMERCE VOLUME PRICING filed on Jun. 3, 1999 now abandoned, which claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/133,769, filed May 12, 1999, and entitled E-COMMERCE VOLUME PRICING. This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/426,063 filed Oct. 22, 1999, entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL. This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending P.C.T. Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US00/11989, filed May 3, 2000, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL, AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPEN OFFER SHEETS, which claims priority to: U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/137,583, filed Jun. 4, 1999, and entitled E-COMMERCE AUTOMATED SELLER SELECTION SYSTEM; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/138,209, filed Jun. 9, 1999, and entitled SECURITIZATION OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/139,338, filed Jun. 16, 1999, and entitled REAL-TIME OPTIMIZED BUYING BLOCK; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/139,518, filed Jun. 16, 1999, and entitled REAL-TIME MARKET PURCHASING; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/139,519, filed Jun. 16, 1999, and entitled E-COMMERCE PURCHASING CARD; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/342,345, filed Jun. 29, 1999, and entitled CREDIT BASED TRANSACTION SYSTEM AND METHODOLOGY; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/142,371, filed Jul. 6, 1999, and entitled TIME VALUE OF MONEY BASED CREDIT CARD FOR MERCHANT; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/160,510, filed Oct. 20, 1999, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL, AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPEN OFFER SHEETS; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/426,063, filed Oct. 22, 1999, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/162,182, filed Oct. 28, 1999, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL, AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPEN OFFER SHEETS; and U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/173,409, filed Dec. 28, 1999, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL, AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPEN OFFER SHEETS. This application claims priority to co-pending U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/237,474, filed Oct. 2, 2000, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL, AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPEN OFFER SHEETS.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4887207 | Natarajan | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4947028 | Gorog | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4992940 | Dworkin | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5053956 | Donald et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5053957 | Suzuki | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5063506 | Brockwell et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5402336 | Spiegelhoff et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5414838 | Kolton et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5444630 | Dlugos | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5564115 | Clarkson | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5592375 | Salmon et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5615109 | Eder | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5623660 | Josephson | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5710887 | Chelliah et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5732400 | Mandler et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734890 | Case et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797127 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5822736 | Hartman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837071 | Andersson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5842178 | Giovannoli | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878400 | Carter | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5897620 | Walker et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5903830 | Joao et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5923741 | Wright et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933817 | Hucal | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940807 | Purcell | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5945653 | Walker et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950172 | Klingman | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5966697 | Fergerson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5970478 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974396 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974406 | Bisdikian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5987434 | Libman | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995943 | Bull et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6014638 | Burge et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016484 | Williams et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6026383 | Ausubel | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6035289 | Chou et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6052670 | Johnson | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055519 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6064981 | Barni et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6078906 | Huberman | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6101484 | Halbert et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108632 | Reeder et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108639 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112185 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112189 | Rickard et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6131087 | Luke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141653 | Conklin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151588 | Tozzoli et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6167383 | Henson | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6195646 | Grosh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6219653 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233566 | Levine et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236972 | Shkedy | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236977 | Verba et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236978 | Tuzhilin | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6249772 | Walker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6260019 | Courts | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6260024 | Shkedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266651 | Woolston | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269343 | Pallakoff | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6289348 | Richard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6323894 | Katz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6332127 | Bandera et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332135 | Conklin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6336105 | Conklin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6338050 | Conklin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6360205 | Iyengar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6397208 | Lee | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6415270 | Rackson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6418415 | Walker et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6418441 | Call | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6449601 | Friedland et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6450407 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6456986 | Boardman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466919 | Walker et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6496568 | Nelson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6507279 | Loof | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6519571 | Guheen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6553346 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553350 | Carter | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6560501 | Walser et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6578014 | Murcko, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6584451 | Shoham et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6587835 | Treyz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6598026 | Ojha et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601043 | Purcell | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6604089 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6606607 | Martin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6607136 | Atsmon et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6631356 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6647257 | Owensby | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6647373 | Carlton-Foss | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6658093 | Langseth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6662194 | Joao et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6716101 | Meadows et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6754636 | Walker et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6778968 | Gulati | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6782370 | Stack | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785661 | Mandler et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6847938 | Moore | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6847965 | Walker et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6850907 | Lutnick et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6868392 | Ogasawara | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6871140 | Florance et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6871190 | Seymour et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6876977 | Marks | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6876983 | Goddard | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6877655 | Robertson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6877665 | Gobburu et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6915275 | Banerjee et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6925446 | Watanabe | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6928416 | Bertash | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6934690 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6954734 | Kuelbs et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6990467 | Kwan | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6992794 | Keane et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7039603 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047206 | Schultze | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7062452 | Lotvin et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7065494 | Evans | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7069228 | Rose et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7072849 | Filepp et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7072853 | Shkedi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7076447 | Peyser et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7080030 | Eglen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7103565 | Vaid | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7107225 | McClung, III | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7107226 | Cassidy et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7120592 | Lewis | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7124099 | Mesaros | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7124107 | Pishevar et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7133835 | Fusz et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7143057 | Kuelbs et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7146330 | Alon et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7165045 | Kim-E | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7181419 | Mesaros | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7194427 | Van Horn et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7194442 | Flanagan et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7213754 | Eglen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7254833 | Cornelius et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7296001 | Ephrati et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7330826 | Porat et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7343317 | Jokinen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7349890 | Pathak et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7363246 | Van Horn et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7364086 | Mesaros | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7379899 | Junger | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7415428 | Garwood | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7415617 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7433832 | Bezos et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7464051 | Heggem | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7475024 | Phan | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7496543 | Bamford et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7539742 | Spector | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542927 | Mukai | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7552069 | Kepecs | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7584146 | Duhon | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7593871 | Mesaros | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7596509 | Bryson | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7599857 | Bishop et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7606731 | McClung, III | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7624044 | Wren | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7630919 | Obrecht | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7636672 | Angles et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7672870 | Haines et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7680696 | Murray | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7689463 | Mesaros | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7689468 | Walker et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689469 | Mesaros | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7693748 | Mesaros | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7698173 | Burge et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7698208 | Hirani et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7698240 | Chatterjee et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7706838 | Atsmon et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7725350 | Schlee | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7729977 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7747473 | Mesaros | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7792699 | Kwie | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7813955 | Ariff et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7814106 | Guido et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7815114 | Mesaros | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7818212 | Mesaros | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7860776 | Chin et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 7890373 | Junger | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7899707 | Mesaros | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7912761 | Vaid | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917386 | Christensen | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917416 | Quinn et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7937288 | Blaser et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7942316 | Bennett et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7958007 | Urbanski et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8005747 | Forlai | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8015583 | Bates et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8024226 | Fusz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8032409 | Mikurak | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8032422 | Pickard et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8036941 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8073762 | Sheth et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8140402 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8140405 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8140442 | Heyer | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8160931 | Mesaros | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8196811 | Mesaros | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8219460 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8249942 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 20010011264 | Kawasaki | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010014868 | Herz et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010018660 | Sehr | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010039514 | Barenbaum | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044751 | Pugliese, III et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047296 | Wyker | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047311 | Singh | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020026351 | Coleman | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032573 | Williams et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035536 | Gellman | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040352 | McCormick | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046105 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046147 | Livesay et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052782 | Landesmann | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065762 | Lee et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065769 | Irribarren et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069079 | Vega | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020080950 | Koko et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082881 | Price et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091580 | Wang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099643 | Abeshouse et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103741 | Boies et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107773 | Abdou | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116282 | Martin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143692 | Heimermann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147670 | Lange | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165771 | Walker et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165821 | Tree | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169703 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169759 | Kraft et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174051 | Wise | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188508 | Lee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004802 | Callegari | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030004808 | Elhaoussine et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028473 | Eso et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041002 | Hao et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055774 | Ginsberg | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093355 | Issa | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030109949 | Ikeda | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030111531 | Williams et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115100 | Teicher | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126040 | Mesaros | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126250 | Jhanji | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149619 | Stanley et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167222 | Mehrotra et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195832 | Cao et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208412 | Hillestad et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030216960 | Postrel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233276 | Pearlman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233557 | Zimmerman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015415 | Cofino et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039661 | Fuzell-Casey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039677 | Mura et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093276 | Nishio | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128197 | Bam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215500 | Monahan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021400 | Postrel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021401 | Postrel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038713 | Pickard et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149458 | Eglen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171918 | Eden et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197857 | Avery | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216337 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272442 | Miller et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273415 | Mathews et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060059062 | Wood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069619 | Walker et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095327 | Vaughn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095366 | Sheth et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106678 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129454 | Moon et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143080 | Garg et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178918 | Mikurak | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070150349 | Handel et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220169 | Silver et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080015711 | Charland et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052189 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082418 | Fordyce et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080126201 | Ullah | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20090055328 | Bamford et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090059856 | Kermoal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083136 | Blackwood | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089177 | Dayton et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187455 | Fernandes et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198622 | Temte et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276305 | Clopp | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090307073 | MirrokniBanadaki et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327034 | Petersen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327038 | Petersen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327101 | Sayed | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327140 | Kuo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100088174 | Cohagan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125525 | Inamdar | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004515 | Mesaros | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016010 | Mesaros | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040624 | Jhanji | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125592 | Mesaros | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213648 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213649 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213650 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213653 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238476 | Carr et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246271 | Mesaros | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246274 | Mesaros | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264499 | Abendroth et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110270699 | Mesaros | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110270700 | Mesaros | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120022970 | Mesaros | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120029993 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120029995 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120035999 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036000 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036031 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120041811 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120054012 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158475 | Mesaros | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179526 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179530 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197705 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197722 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 200050970 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 11-184910 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 9821713 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9821713 | May 1998 | WO |
| 200050970 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| 0070424 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 0070424 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 2008083371 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60133769 | May 1999 | US | |
| 60137583 | Jun 1999 | US | |
| 60138209 | Jun 1999 | US | |
| 60139338 | Jun 1999 | US | |
| 60139518 | Jun 1999 | US | |
| 60139519 | Jun 1999 | US | |
| 60142371 | Jul 1999 | US | |
| 60160510 | Oct 1999 | US | |
| 60162182 | Oct 1999 | US | |
| 60173409 | Dec 1999 | US | |
| 60237474 | Oct 2000 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09324391 | Jun 1999 | US |
| Child | 09922884 | US | |
| Parent | 09426063 | Oct 1999 | US |
| Child | 09324391 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US00/11989 | May 2000 | US |
| Child | 09426063 | US | |
| Parent | 09342345 | Jun 1999 | US |
| Child | PCT/US00/11989 | US |
