Identifying sources of packet drops in a service function chain environment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10778551
  • Patent Number
    10,778,551
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 14, 2019
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 15, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Embodiments are directed to a service function configured to receive, from a service function forwarder, a data packet comprising a bit field to indicate that a packet drop is to be monitored; apply a policy for the data packet; determine that the data packet is to be dropped based on the policy; set a drop-propagate bit in a header of the data packet; and transmit the data packet to the service function forwarder. Embodiments are directed to a service function forwarder configured to receive a data packet from a service function, the data packet comprising a bit set to indicate that a packet drop is to be monitored; generate an Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) message, the ICMP message comprising a destination address for the ICMP message identified from the data packet; transmit the ICMP message to the destination address; and drop the data packet from the service function chain.
Description
FIELD

This disclosure pertains to identify a cause of a packet drop, and in particular, to detecting and differentiating a packet drop due to policy versus a packet drop due to a malfunctioning service function, in a service function chain environment.


BACKGROUND

In computer networking, network administrators are often concerned with how to best route traffic flows from one end point to another end point across a network. When provisioning a route for a traffic flow, administrators may implement policies to ensure that certain service functions are applied to the packet or the traffic flow as it traverses across the network. Service functions can provide security, wide area network (WAN) acceleration, and loadbalancing. These service functions can be implemented at various points in the network infrastructure, such as the wide area network, data center, campus, etc. Network elements providing these service functions are generally referred to as “service nodes.”


Traditionally, service node deployment is dictated by the network topology. For instance, firewalls are usually deployed at the edge of an administrative zone for filtering traffic leaving or entering the particular zone according to a policy for that zone. With the rise of virtual platforms and more agile networks, service node deployment can no longer be bound by the network topology. To enable service nodes to be deployed anywhere on a network, a solution called Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture (IETF draft-ietf-sfc-architecture-04, Sep. 20, 2014) and Network Service Header (NSH) (IETF draft-quinn-sfc-nsh-03, Jul. 3, 2014) have been provided to encapsulated packets or frames to prescribe service paths for traffic flows through the appropriate service nodes. Specifically, Network Service Headers provide data plane encapsulation that utilizes the network overlay topology used to deliver packets to the requisite services.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

To provide a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and features and advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts.



FIG. 1A illustrates a Service Function Chain (SFC), which may include an initial Classification function, as an entry point into a Service Function Path (SFP), according to some embodiments of the disclosure;



FIGS. 1B-C illustrate different service paths realized using service function chaining, according to some embodiments of the disclosure;



FIG. 2 shows a system view of a Service Chain Function-aware network element for prescribing a service path of a traffic flow, according to some embodiments of the disclosure;



FIG. 3 shows a system view of a service node, according to some embodiments of the disclosure;



FIGS. 4A-B are schematic diagrams of an example service function forwarder handling a data packet in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;



FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) message in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;



FIGS. 6A-6B are process flow diagrams for handling a packet by a service function forwarder in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure; and



FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example header that includes a reserved bit that can be used for a validation bit in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Aspects of the embodiments are directed to a method for packet drop handling in a service function chain environment, the method including receiving a data packet from a service function, the data packet comprising a bit set to indicate that a packet drop is to be monitored; generating an Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) message, the ICMP message comprising a destination address for the ICMP message identified from the data packet; transmitting the ICMP message to the destination address; and dropping the data packet from the service function chain.


Aspects of the embodiments are directed to a service function forwarder network element of a service function chain, the service function forwarder including at least one memory element having instructions stored thereon and at least one processors coupled to the at least one memory element and configured to execute the instructions to cause the service function forwarder network element to receive a data packet from a service function, the data packet comprising a bit set to indicate that a packet drop is to be monitored; generate an Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) message, the ICMP message comprising a destination address for the ICMP message identified from the data packet; transmit the ICMP message to the destination address; and drop the data packet from the service function chain.


Aspects of the embodiments are directed to a computer-readable non-transitory medium comprising one or more instructions for handling packet drops in a service function chain, the instructions when executed on a processor are operable to receive, from a service function forwarder network element, a data packet comprising a bit field to indicate that a packet drop is to be monitored; apply one or more policies for the data packet; determine that the data packet is to be dropped based on at least one of the one or more policies; set a drop-propagate bit in a header of the data packet; and transmit the data packet to the service function forwarder network element.


Aspects of the embodiments are directed to a computer-readable non-transitory medium comprising one or more instructions for handling packet drops in a service function chain, the instructions when executed on a processor are operable to receive, from a service function forwarder network element, a data packet comprising a bit field to indicate that a packet drop is to be monitored; apply one or more policies for the data packet; determine that the data packet is to be dropped based on at least one of the one or more policies; set a drop-propagate bit in a header of the data packet; and transmit the data packet to the service function forwarder network element.


Aspects of the embodiments are directed to a method performed at a service function of a service function chain, the method including receiving, from a service function forwarder network element, a data packet comprising a bit field to indicate that a packet drop is to be monitored; applying one or more policies for the data packet; determining that the data packet is to be dropped based on at least one of the one or more policies; setting a drop-propagate bit in a header of the data packet; and transmitting the data packet to the service function forwarder network element.


Aspects of the embodiments are directed to a computer-readable non-transitory medium comprising one or more instructions for handling packet drops in a service function chain, the instructions when executed on a processor are operable to receive a data packet from a service function, the data packet comprising a bit set to indicate that a packet drop is to be monitored; generate an Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) message, the ICMP message comprising a destination address for the ICMP message identified from the data packet; transmit the ICMP message to the destination address; and drop the data packet from the service function chain.


Some embodiments also include receiving a data packet destined for the service function, the data packet comprising the bit set to indicate that the packet drop is to be monitored; and forwarding the data packet to the service function.


In some embodiments, generating the ICMP message comprises generating the ICMP message with the data packet payload and the destination address from a reply-to field from the data packet header.


In some embodiments, generating the ICMP message comprises generating the ICMP message with an error code identifying one or more policies causing the drop of the packet.


In some embodiments, the instructions further operable when executed to receive a data packet destined for the service function, the data packet comprising the bit set to indicate that the packet drop is to be monitored; and forward the data packet to the service function.


In some embodiments, wherein generating the ICMP message comprises generating the ICMP message with the data packet payload and the destination address from a reply-to field from the data packet header.


In some embodiments, wherein generating the ICMP message comprises generating the ICMP message with an error code identifying one or more policies causing the drop of the packet.


In some embodiments, the instructions are further operable when executed to receive a data packet destined for the service function, the data packet comprising the bit set to indicate that the packet drop is to be monitored; and forward the data packet to the service function.


In some embodiments, generating the ICMP message comprises generating the ICMP message with the data packet payload and the destination address from a reply-to field from the data packet header.


In some embodiments, generating the ICMP message comprises generating the ICMP message with an error code identifying one or more policies causing the drop of the packet.


In some embodiments, the instructions are further operable to apply one or more service functions to the data packet.


In some embodiments, the instructions are further operable to determine whether the bit field that indicates that a packet drop is to be monitored is set, and if the bit field is set, then set the drop-propagate bit in the header of the data packet.


In some embodiments, the instructions are further operable to determine that the bit field that indicates that a packet drop is to be monitored is not set, and drop the packet.


Some embodiments also include applying one or more service functions to the data packet.


Some embodiments also include determining whether the bit field that indicates that a packet drop is to be monitored is set, and if the bit field is set, then setting the drop-propagate bit in the header of the data packet.


Some embodiments also include determining that the bit field that indicates that a packet drop is to be monitored is not set, and dropping the packet.


In a service function chain (SFC) environment, a packet can flow over a set of Service Functions (SFs) for packet treatment. A packet flowing over a specific service function path (SFP) might be dropped due to different reasons, such as:


Service Functions like Firewall drop a packet due 1. to firewall policy;


2. Service Functions like DPI, Anomaly detection, etc., might drop a packet on detecting certain signature etc.;


3. Malfunctioning Service Function (abruptly dropping it).


This disclosure describes detecting and differentiating whether a packet drop is due to policy (expected) or a malfunctioning SF (unexpected).


This disclosure describes leveraging a header bit added into the data plane traffic packet that can be used between a service function forwarder (SFF) and an SF so that an Operator can differentiate such failures. The use of an indicator bit can facilitate troubleshooting activities within the service function path.


This disclosure describes an source (such as an operator or other cloud-computing operator) selecting to know about whether to receive specific drop errors and causes. An operator can elect to check if data traffic is dropped due to policy or unexpected behavior, and can set a Validation bit (V), an O bit, or another bit in header, that serves as a flag to an SF to provide information on a policy-based drop. The validation bit, O bit, or other bit, can be set by a classifier network element or a mid-stream SFF. In embodiments, the V-bit can be one of the reserved bits from the packet header. The SF that is instructed by local policy to drop the packet will set a new bit (DP or Drop Propagate bit) in the header and forward back to SFF. SFF will drop the packet and will generate error message stating “Drop due to policy.” In case of unexpected or malfunctioning drop, the initiator (OAM server or Classifier) will not receive any such error message that differentiates such two types of drops.


Basics of Network Service Chaining or Service Function Chains in a Network


To accommodate agile networking and flexible provisioning of network nodes in the network, Service Function Chains (SFC) can be used to ensure an ordered set of Service Functions (SF) to be applied to packets and/or frames of a traffic flow. SFCs provides a method for deploying SFs in a way that enables dynamic ordering and topological independence of those SFs. A service function chain can define an ordered set of service functions that is applied to packets and/or frames of a traffic flow, where the ordered set of service functions are selected as a result of classification. The implied order may not be a linear progression as the architecture allows for nodes that copy to more than one branch. The term service chain is often used as shorthand for service function chain.



FIG. 1A illustrates a Service Function Chain (SFC), which may include an initial service classification function 102, as an entry point into a Service Function Path (SFP) 104 (or service path). The (initial) service classification function 102 prescribes a service path, and encapsulates a packet or frame with the service path information which identifies the service path. The classification potentially adds metadata, or shared context, to the SFC encapsulation part of the packet or frame. The service function path 104 may include a plurality of service functions (shown as “SF1”, . . . , “SFN”).


A service function can be responsible for specific treatment of received packets. A service function can act at the network layer or other OSI layers (e.g., application layer, presentation layer, session layer, transport layer, data link layer, and physical link layer). A service function can be a virtual instance or be embedded in a physical network element such as a service node. When a service function or other modules of a service node is executed by the at least one processors of the service node, the service function or other modules can be configured to implement any one of the methods described herein. Multiple service functions can be embedded in the same network element. Multiple instances of the service function can be enabled in the same administrative SFC-enabled domain. A non-exhaustive list of SFs includes: firewalls, WAN and application acceleration, Deep Packet Inspection (DPI), server load balancers, NAT44, NAT64, HOST_ID injection, HTTP Header Enrichment functions, TCP optimizer, etc. An SF may be SFC encapsulation aware, that is it receives, and acts on information in the SFC encapsulation, or unaware in which case data forwarded to the service does not contain the SFC encapsulation.


A Service Node (SN) can be a physical network element (or a virtual element embedded on a physical network element) that hosts one or more service functions (SFs) and has one or more network locators associated with it for reachability and service delivery. In many standardization documents, “service functions” can refer to the service nodes described herein as having one or more service functions hosted thereon. Service Function Path (SFP) (or sometimes referred simply as service path) relates to the instantiation of a SFC in the network. Packets follow a service path from a classifier through the requisite service functions.



FIGS. 1B-C illustrate different service paths realized using service function chaining. These service paths can be implemented by encapsulating packets of a traffic flow with a network service header (NSH) or some other suitable packet header which specifies a desired service path (e.g., by identifying a particular service path using service path information in the NSH). In the example shown in FIG. 1B, a service path 120 can be provided between end point 160 and endpoint 180 through service node 106 and service node 110. In the example shown in FIG. 1C, a service path 130 (a different instantiation) can be provided between end point 170 and endpoint 190 through service node 106, service node 108, and service node 112.


Network Service Header (NSH) Encapsulation


Generally speaking, an NSH includes service path information, and NSH is added to a packet or frame. For instance, an NSH can include a data plane header added to packets or frames. Effectively, the NSH creates a service plane. The NSH includes information for service chaining, and in some cases, the NSH can include metadata added and/or consumed by service nodes or service functions. The packets and NSH are encapsulated in an outer header for transport. To implement a service path, a network element such as a service classifier (SCL) or some other suitable SFC-aware network element can process packets or frames of a traffic flow and performs NSH encapsulation according to a desired policy for the traffic flow.



FIG. 2 shows a system view of SFC-aware network element, e.g., such as a (initial) service classifier (SCL), for prescribing a service path of a traffic flow, according to some embodiments of the disclosure. Network element 202 includes processor 204, (computer-readable non-transitory) memory 206 for storing data and instructions. Furthermore, network element 202 includes service classification function 208 and service header encapsulator 210 (both can be provided by processor 204 when processor 204 executes the instructions stored in memory 206).


The service classification function 208 can process a packet of a traffic flow and determine whether the packet requires servicing and correspondingly which service path to follow to apply the appropriate service. The determination can be performed based on business policies and/or rules stored in memory 206. Once the determination of the service path is made, service header encapsulator 210 generates an appropriate NSH having identification information for the service path and adds the NSH to the packet. The service header encapsulator 210 provides an outer encapsulation to forward the packet to the start of the service path. Other SFC-aware network elements are thus able to process the NSH while other non-SFC-aware network elements would simply forward the encapsulated packets as is. Besides inserting an NSH, network element 202 can also remove the NSH if the service classification function 208 determines the packet does not require servicing.


Network Service Headers


A network service header (NSH) can include a (e.g., 64-bit) base header, and one or more context headers. Generally speaking, the base header provides information about the service header and service path identification (e.g., a service path identifier), and context headers can carry opaque metadata (such as the metadata described herein reflecting the result of classification). For instance, an NSH can include a 4-byte base header, a 4-byte service path header, and optional context headers. The base header can provide information about the service header and the payload protocol. The service path header can provide path identification and location within a path. The (variable length) context headers can carry opaque metadata and variable length encoded information. The one or more optional context headers make up a context header section in the NSH. For instance, the context header section can include one or more context header fields having pieces of information therein, describing the packet/frame. Based on the information in the base header, a service function of a service node can derive policy selection from the NSH. Context headers shared in the NSH can provide a range of service-relevant information such as traffic classification. Service functions can use NSH to select local service policy.


Service Nodes and Proxy Nodes


Once properly encapsulated, the packet having the NSF is then forwarded to one or more service nodes where service(s) can be applied to the packet/frame. FIG. 3 shows a system view of a service node, according to some embodiments of the disclosure. Service node 300, generally a network element, can include processor 302, (computer-readable non-transitory) memory 304 for storing data and instructions. Furthermore, service node 300 includes service function(s) 306 (e.g., for applying service(s) to the packet/frame, classifying the packet/frame) and service header processor 308. The service functions(s) 306 and service header processor 306 can be provided by processor 302 when processor 302 executes the instructions stored in memory 304. Service header processor 308 can extract the NSH, and in some cases, update the NSH as needed. For instance, the service header processor 308 can decrement the service index if a service index=0 is used to indicate that a packet is to be dropped by the service node 300. In another instance, the service header processor 308 or some other suitable module provide by the service node can update context header fields if new/updated context is available.


Example Implementations

This disclosure describes a Service Function (such as a Firewall, DPI, etc.) that when the SF is expected to drop a packet due to policy and if a new bit is set by the classifier (e.g., a Data Validation bit or an O bit), the SF will set a new bit (e.g., Drop-Propagate bit) set in the header of the packet, and forward the packet to the SFF.


The SFF can generate an Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) message and forward to the relevant node (Classifier/Initiator/Server, etc.) using a new ICMP code and include the header from the to-be-dropped packet.


The classifier will be instructed to include Validation bit (or the O bit) in traffic flows that needs drop monitoring and differentiate if the missing packets are due to policy or unexpected drop. The classifier in addition will include a “reply-to” address in Metadata. This address is used to send the ICMP reply back from the SFF.



FIGS. 4A-B are schematic diagrams of an example service function forwarder handling a data packet in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 4A is a schematic diagram 400 of a service function forwarder (SFF) 402 that receives a data packet 406 that includes a bit set in the data packet header indicating a request to report data packet drop due to policy. For example, the data packet header can have an O bit set or a data validation bit set that indicates to a service function (SF) 404 to report a packet drop due to policy reasons to the SFF 402.


Upon receiving the packet 406, the SFF 402 can process the packet 406 based on the intended SF 404 from the SFP and SI information from the packet header. The SF 404 can process the packet in accordance to the SF's function. In some embodiments, the SF 404 can determine that policy enforcement indicates that the SF 404 should drop the packet. The SF 404 can set another bit in the packet header that indicates to the SFF 402 that the SFF 402 should generate an Internet Control Message Protcol (ICMP) message. This bit can be a drop propagate (DP) bit in the packet header. The SF 404 can then forward the packet back to the SFF 402.


In embodiments where a data validation bit or O bit (or other bit) is not set, then the SF 404 can drop the packet and forgo setting the DP bit and forgo forwarding the packet to the SFF 402.


In FIG. 4B, the SFF 402 can receive a packet from the SF 404 that includes a DP bit set. The SFF 402, upon receiving a packet with DP flag, will drop the packet and generate an Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) message with a new code and include the dropped packet header and forward the ICMP message to the “reply-to” address identified from the packet header.


The concepts described herein are applicable for probe packets and data packets and is scalable as it is not required to be done on all flows/packets.



FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) message 500 in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. The ICMP message 500 can include an IP header 502 that identifies the reply-to address and the source IP from the service function forwarder. The ICMP message 500 can also include as much as the initial packet payload 504 as is possible within the payload of the ICMP message 500.



FIGS. 6A-6B are process flow diagrams for handling a packet by a service function forwarder in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 6A is a process flow diagram 600 for processing a data packet. At the outset, an operator can use a classifier or a service function forwarder to set a data validation bit or an O bit or another bit flag in a data packet header (602). The data packet can be sent through a service function chain based on the service path identifier and service index identified in the data packet header (604).


A service function forwarder (SFF) can receive the data packet and forward the packet to a service function (606). The service function (SF) can process the data packet based on the information from the data packet header; the SF can also apply one or more policies for the data packet based on the information from the data packet header (608). In embodiments, the policy or policies implemented can indicate that the data packet should be dropped (610).


The SF can determine from the data packet header whether the validation bit or the O bit (or other bit flag is set that indicates the operator's election to monitor causes of dropped packets, but for ease, this bit is referred to here as a validation bit) (612). If the SF determines that the validation bit is not set, then the SF can drop the data packet and take no further action for that data packet (618).


If the SF determines that the validation bit is set, then the SF can set a drop-propagate (DP) bit in the data packet header (614). The SF can then send the data packet with the DP bit set to the SFF (616).



FIG. 6B is a process flow diagram 650 for handling a data packet that includes a drop-propagate (DP) bit set. The service function forwarder (SFF) can receive a data packet from the service function (SF), the data packet including a DP bit set (652). The SFF can identify from the data packet header that the DP bit has been set (654) The SFF can generate an Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) message with the reply-to information from the data packet header (656). The ICMP message can also include new coding, data packet payload, header information, etc. The SFF can send the ICMP to the destination identified in the reply-to address (658). The SFF can drop the data packet (660).


In some embodiments, the last SFF in a service function chain can decapsulate the data packet's NSH header, and can send a positive notification message (ICMP with a new code) when the Validation bit is set, that confirms that the packet has successfully flowed through the service function chain. When an operator sets the validation bit in a data traffic, the operator can receive the following:


1. If allowed by policies will receive a positive response from last SFF.


2. If dropped by policies, will receive an error code from connected SFF.


3. If dropped abruptly, will not receive any response.


If the packet drops, but the source that requested the monitoring does not receive the ICMP message, then the source can determine that the packet drop was in error (e.g., due to a malfunctioning SF or other issue with the service function chain, or with the packet itself). If the source does receive the ICMP message, then the source can determine the cause of the packet drop, such as which policy was enforced and where in the service function chain the policy was enforced.



FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example packet header 700 that includes a reserved bit that can be used for a validation bit in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. The packet header 700 includes one or more reserve bits 702. One of the reserved bits 702 can be used as a validation bit (V). When V=1, the SF is signaled to track the source of a packet drop, as described above. Also shown in FIG. 7 is the O bit 704. In embodiments, the O bit 704 can be used to signal the SF to monitor packet drop sources, though is used for other operations, as well.


Variations and Implementations


Within the context of the disclosure, a network used herein represents a series of points, nodes, or network elements of interconnected communication paths for receiving and transmitting packets of information that propagate through a communication system. A network offers communicative interface between sources and/or hosts, and may be any local area network (LAN), wireless local area network (WLAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), Intranet, Extranet, Internet, WAN, virtual private network (VPN), or any other appropriate architecture or system that facilitates communications in a network environment depending on the network topology. A network can comprise any number of hardware or software elements coupled to (and in communication with) each other through a communications medium.


In one particular instance, the architecture of the present disclosure can be associated with a service provider deployment. In other examples, the architecture of the present disclosure would be equally applicable to other communication environments, such as an enterprise wide area network (WAN) deployment. The architecture of the present disclosure may include a configuration capable of transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP) communications for the transmission and/or reception of packets in a network.


As used herein in this Specification, the term ‘network element’ is meant to encompass any of the aforementioned elements, as well as servers (physical or virtually implemented on physical hardware), machines (physical or virtually implemented on physical hardware), end user devices, routers, switches, cable boxes, gateways, bridges, loadbalancers, firewalls, inline service nodes, proxies, processors, modules, or any other suitable device, component, element, proprietary appliance, or object operable to exchange, receive, and transmit information in a network environment. These network elements may include any suitable hardware, software, components, modules, interfaces, or objects that facilitate the network service header features/operations thereof. This may be inclusive of appropriate algorithms and communication protocols that allow for the effective exchange of data or information.


In one implementation, nodes with NSH capabilities may include software to achieve (or to foster) the functions discussed herein for providing the NSH-related features/functions where the software is executed on one or more processors to carry out the functions. This could include the implementation of instances of service functions, service header processors, metadata augmentation modules and/or any other suitable element that would foster the activities discussed herein. Additionally, each of these elements can have an internal structure (e.g., a processor, a memory element, etc.) to facilitate some of the operations described herein. In other embodiments, these functions may be executed externally to these elements, or included in some other network element to achieve the intended functionality. Alternatively, these nodes may include software (or reciprocating software) that can coordinate with other network elements in order to achieve the functions described herein. In still other embodiments, one or several devices may include any suitable algorithms, hardware, software, components, modules, interfaces, or objects that facilitate the operations thereof.


In certain example implementations, the NSH-related functions outlined herein may be implemented by logic encoded in one or more non-transitory, tangible media (e.g., embedded logic provided in an application specific integrated circuit [ASIC], digital signal processor [DSP] instructions, software [potentially inclusive of object code and source code] to be executed by one or more processors, or other similar machine, etc.). In some of these instances, one or more memory elements can store data used for the operations described herein. This includes the memory element being able to store instructions (e.g., software, code, etc.) that are executed to carry out the activities described in this Specification. The memory element is further configured to store databases or metadata disclosed herein. The processor can execute any type of instructions associated with the data to achieve the operations detailed herein in this Specification. In one example, the processor could transform an element or an article (e.g., data) from one state or thing to another state or thing. In another example, the activities outlined herein may be implemented with fixed logic or programmable logic (e.g., software/computer instructions executed by the processor) and the elements identified herein could be some type of a programmable processor, programmable digital logic (e.g., a field programmable gate array [FPGA], an erasable programmable read only memory (EPROM), an electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM)) or an ASIC that includes digital logic, software, code, electronic instructions, or any suitable combination thereof.


Any of these elements (e.g., the network elements, service nodes, etc.) can include memory elements for storing information to be used in achieving the NSH-related features, as outlined herein. Additionally, each of these devices may include a processor that can execute software or an algorithm to perform the NSH-related features as discussed in this Specification. These devices may further keep information in any suitable memory element [random access memory (RAM), ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, ASIC, etc.], software, hardware, or in any other suitable component, device, element, or object where appropriate and based on particular needs. Any of the memory items discussed herein should be construed as being encompassed within the broad term ‘memory element.’ Similarly, any of the potential processing elements, modules, and machines described in this Specification should be construed as being encompassed within the broad term ‘processor.’ Each of the network elements can also include suitable interfaces for receiving, transmitting, and/or otherwise communicating data or information in a network environment.


Additionally, it should be noted that with the examples provided above, interaction may be described in terms of two, three, or four network elements. However, this has been done for purposes of clarity and example only. In certain cases, it may be easier to describe one or more of the functionalities of a given set of flows by only referencing a limited number of network elements. It should be appreciated that the systems described herein are readily scalable and, further, can accommodate a large number of components, as well as more complicated/sophisticated arrangements and configurations. Accordingly, the examples provided should not limit the scope or inhibit the broad techniques of using and augmenting NSH metadata, as potentially applied to a myriad of other architectures.


It is also important to note that the various steps described herein illustrate only some of the possible scenarios that may be executed by, or within, the nodes with NSH capabilities described herein. Some of these steps may be deleted or removed where appropriate, or these steps may be modified or changed considerably without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In addition, a number of these operations have been described as being executed concurrently with, or in parallel to, one or more additional operations. However, the timing of these operations may be altered considerably. The preceding operational flows have been offered for purposes of example and discussion. Substantial flexibility is provided by nodes with NSH capabilities in that any suitable arrangements, chronologies, configurations, and timing mechanisms may be provided without departing from the teachings of the present disclosure.


It should also be noted that many of the previous discussions may imply a single client-server relationship. In reality, there is a multitude of servers in the delivery tier in certain implementations of the present disclosure. Moreover, the present disclosure can readily be extended to apply to intervening servers further upstream in the architecture, though this is not necessarily correlated to the ‘m’ clients that are passing through the ‘n’ servers. Any such permutations, scaling, and configurations are clearly within the broad scope of the present disclosure.


Numerous other changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be ascertained to one skilled in the art and it is intended that the present disclosure encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications as falling within the scope of the appended claims. In order to assist the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and, additionally, any readers of any patent issued on this application in interpreting the claims appended hereto, Applicant wishes to note that the Applicant: (a) does not intend any of the appended claims to invoke paragraph six (6) of 35 U.S.C. section 112 as it exists on the date of the filing hereof unless the words “means for” or “step for” are specifically used in the particular claims; and (b) does not intend, by any statement in the specification, to limit this disclosure in any way that is not otherwise reflected in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for packet drop handling in a service function chain environment, the method comprising: receiving a data packet from a service function in response to the data packet comprising a first bit set to indicate that a packet is to be monitored and a second bit set to indicate that a packet is to be dropped;generating, in response to the receiving, a second message comprising a destination address for a first message identified from the data packet;transmitting the second message to the destination address; anddropping the data packet from the service function chain;wherein the second message represents a communication to the destination address that the drop of the data packet was intentional.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a data packet destined for the service function, the data packet comprising the first and second bits; andforwarding the data packet to the service function.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein generating the second message comprises generating the second message with a data packet payload and the destination address from a reply-to field from a data packet header.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein generating the second message comprises generating the second message with an error code identifying one or more policies causing a drop of the packet.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the data packet comprises one or more reserved bits in a packet header, and the first bit set is one of the reserved bits from the packet header.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the one or more reserved bits in the data packet comprises a validation bit.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the data packet comprises a packet header comprising an 0 bit, wherein the first bit set is the 0 bit.
  • 8. A computer-readable non-transitory medium comprising one or more instructions for handling packet drops in a service function chain, the instructions when executed on a processor are operable to perform operations comprising: receiving a data packet from a service function in response to the data packet comprising a first bit set to indicate that a packet is to be monitored and a second bit set to indicate that a packet is to be dropped;generating, in response to the receiving, a second message comprising a destination address for a first message identified from the data packet;transmitting the second message to the destination address; anddropping the data packet from the service function chain;wherein the second message represents a communication to the destination address that the drop of the data packet was intentional.
  • 9. The computer-readable non-transitory medium of claim 8, the instructions further operable when executed to receive a data packet destined for the service function, the data packet comprising the first and second bits, and forward the data packet to the service function.
  • 10. The computer-readable non-transitory medium of claim 8, wherein generating the second message comprises generating the second message with a data packet payload and the destination address from a reply-to field from a data packet header.
  • 11. The computer-readable non-transitory medium of claim 8, wherein generating the second message comprises generating the second message with an error code identifying one or more policies causing a drop of the packet.
  • 12. The computer-readable non-transitory medium of claim 8, wherein the data packet comprises one or more reserved bits in a packet header, and the first bit set is one of the reserved bits from the packet header.
  • 13. The computer-readable non-transitory medium of claim 12, wherein the one or more reserved bits in the data packet comprises a validation bit.
  • 14. The computer-readable non-transitory medium of claim 8, wherein the data packet comprises a packet header comprising an 0 bit, wherein the first bit set is the 0 bit.
  • 15. A service function forwarder network element of a service function chain, the service function forwarder network element comprising: at least one memory element having instructions stored thereon;at least one processors coupled to the at least one memory element and configured to execute the instructions to cause the service function forwarder network element to perform operations comprising: receiving a data packet from a service function in response to the data packet comprising a first bit set to indicate that a packet is to be monitored and a second bit set to indicate that a packet is to be dropped;generating, in response to the receiving, a second message comprising a destination address for a first message identified from the data packet;transmitting the second message to the destination address; anddropping the data packet from the service function chain;wherein the second message represents a communication to the destination address that the drop of the data packet was intentional.
  • 16. The service function forwarder network element of claim 15, the instructions further operable when executed to receive a data packet destined for the service function, the data packet comprising the first and second bits set.
  • 17. The service function forwarder network element of claim 15, wherein generating the second message comprises generating the second message with an error code identifying one or more policies causing a drop of the packet.
  • 18. The service function forwarder network element of claim 15, wherein generating the second message comprises generating the second message with a data packet payload and the destination address from a reply-to field from a data packet header.
  • 19. The service function forwarder network element of claim 15, wherein the data packet comprises one or more reserved bits in a packet header, and the first bit set is one of the reserved bits from the packet header.
  • 20. The service function forwarder network element of claim 19, wherein the one or more reserved bits in the data packet comprises a validation bit.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/244,369 filed on Aug. 23, 2016, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (356)
Number Name Date Kind
3629512 Yuan Dec 1971 A
4769811 Eckberg, Jr. et al. Sep 1988 A
5408231 Bowdon Apr 1995 A
5491690 Alfonsi et al. Feb 1996 A
5557609 Shobatake et al. Sep 1996 A
5600638 Bertin et al. Feb 1997 A
5687167 Bertin et al. Nov 1997 A
6115384 Parzych Sep 2000 A
6167438 Yates et al. Dec 2000 A
6400681 Bertin et al. Jun 2002 B1
6661797 Goel et al. Dec 2003 B1
6687229 Kataria et al. Feb 2004 B1
6799270 Bull et al. Sep 2004 B1
6888828 Partanen et al. May 2005 B1
6993593 Iwata Jan 2006 B2
7027408 Nabkel et al. Apr 2006 B2
7062567 Benitez et al. Jun 2006 B2
7095715 Buckman et al. Aug 2006 B2
7096212 Tribble et al. Aug 2006 B2
7139239 Mcfarland et al. Nov 2006 B2
7165107 Pouyoul et al. Jan 2007 B2
7197008 Shabtay et al. Mar 2007 B1
7197660 Liu et al. Mar 2007 B1
7209435 Kuo et al. Apr 2007 B1
7227872 Biswas et al. Jun 2007 B1
7231462 Berthaud et al. Jun 2007 B2
7333990 Thiagarajan et al. Feb 2008 B1
7443796 Albert et al. Oct 2008 B1
7458084 Zhang et al. Nov 2008 B2
7472411 Wing et al. Dec 2008 B2
7486622 Regan et al. Feb 2009 B2
7536396 Johnson et al. May 2009 B2
7552201 Areddu et al. Jun 2009 B2
7558261 Arregoces et al. Jul 2009 B2
7567504 Darling et al. Jul 2009 B2
7571470 Arregoces et al. Aug 2009 B2
7573879 Narad et al. Aug 2009 B2
7596097 McCowan et al. Sep 2009 B1
7610375 Portolani et al. Oct 2009 B2
7643468 Arregoces et al. Jan 2010 B1
7644182 Banerjee et al. Jan 2010 B2
7647422 Singh et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657898 Sadiq Feb 2010 B2
7657940 Portolani et al. Feb 2010 B2
7668116 Wijnands et al. Feb 2010 B2
7684321 Muirhead et al. Mar 2010 B2
7738469 Shekokar et al. Jun 2010 B1
7751409 Carolan Jul 2010 B1
7793157 Bailey et al. Sep 2010 B2
7814284 Glass et al. Oct 2010 B1
7831693 Lai Nov 2010 B2
7852785 Lund et al. Dec 2010 B2
7860095 Forissier et al. Dec 2010 B2
7860100 Khalid et al. Dec 2010 B2
7895425 Khalid et al. Feb 2011 B2
7899012 Ho et al. Mar 2011 B2
7899861 Feblowitz et al. Mar 2011 B2
7907595 Khanna et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908480 Firestone et al. Mar 2011 B2
7983174 Monaghan et al. Jul 2011 B1
7990847 Leroy et al. Aug 2011 B1
8000329 Fendick et al. Aug 2011 B2
8018938 Fromm et al. Sep 2011 B1
8094575 Vadlakonda et al. Jan 2012 B1
8095683 Balasubramanian Jan 2012 B2
8116307 Thesayi et al. Feb 2012 B1
8166465 Feblowitz et al. Apr 2012 B2
8180909 Hartman et al. May 2012 B2
8191119 Wing et al. May 2012 B2
8195774 Lambeth et al. Jun 2012 B2
8238241 Samuels Aug 2012 B2
8280354 Smith et al. Oct 2012 B2
8281302 Durazzo et al. Oct 2012 B2
8291108 Raja et al. Oct 2012 B2
8305900 Bianconi Nov 2012 B2
8311045 Quinn et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316457 Paczkowski et al. Nov 2012 B1
8355332 Beaudette et al. Jan 2013 B2
8442043 Sharma et al. May 2013 B2
8451817 Cheriton May 2013 B2
8464336 Wei et al. Jun 2013 B2
8473981 Gargi Jun 2013 B1
8479298 Keith et al. Jul 2013 B2
8498414 Rossi Jul 2013 B2
8520672 Guichard et al. Aug 2013 B2
8601152 Chou Dec 2013 B1
8605588 Sankaran et al. Dec 2013 B2
8612612 Dukes et al. Dec 2013 B1
8627328 Mousseau et al. Jan 2014 B2
8645952 Biswas et al. Feb 2014 B2
8676965 Gueta Mar 2014 B2
8676980 Kreeger et al. Mar 2014 B2
8700892 Bollay et al. Apr 2014 B2
8724466 Kenigsberg et al. May 2014 B2
8730980 Bagepalli et al. May 2014 B2
8743885 Khan et al. Jun 2014 B2
8751420 Hjelm et al. Jun 2014 B2
8762534 Hong et al. Jun 2014 B1
8762707 Killian et al. Jun 2014 B2
8792490 Jabr et al. Jul 2014 B2
8793400 Mcdysan et al. Jul 2014 B2
8812730 Vos et al. Aug 2014 B2
8819419 Carlson et al. Aug 2014 B2
8825070 Akhtar et al. Sep 2014 B2
8830834 Sharma et al. Sep 2014 B2
8904037 Haggar et al. Dec 2014 B2
8984284 Purdy, Sr. et al. Mar 2015 B2
9001827 Appenzeller Apr 2015 B2
9071533 Hui et al. Jun 2015 B2
9077661 Andreasen et al. Jul 2015 B2
9088584 Feng et al. Jul 2015 B2
9130872 Kumar et al. Sep 2015 B2
9143438 Khan et al. Sep 2015 B2
9160797 Mcdysan Oct 2015 B2
9178812 Guichard et al. Nov 2015 B2
9189285 Ng et al. Nov 2015 B2
9203711 Agarwal et al. Dec 2015 B2
9253274 Quinn et al. Feb 2016 B2
9300579 Frost et al. Mar 2016 B2
9300585 Kumar et al. Mar 2016 B2
9311130 Christenson et al. Apr 2016 B2
9319324 Beheshti-Zavareh et al. Apr 2016 B2
9325565 Yao et al. Apr 2016 B2
9338097 Anand et al. May 2016 B2
9344337 Kumar et al. May 2016 B2
9374297 Bosch et al. Jun 2016 B2
9379931 Bosch et al. Jun 2016 B2
9385950 Quinn et al. Jul 2016 B2
9398486 La Roche, Jr. et al. Jul 2016 B2
9407540 Kumar et al. Aug 2016 B2
9413655 Shatzkamer et al. Aug 2016 B2
9424065 Singh et al. Aug 2016 B2
9436443 Chiosi et al. Sep 2016 B2
9444675 Guichard et al. Sep 2016 B2
9473570 Bhanujan et al. Oct 2016 B2
9479443 Bosch et al. Oct 2016 B2
9491094 Patwardhan et al. Nov 2016 B2
9537836 Maller et al. Jan 2017 B2
9558029 Behera et al. Jan 2017 B2
9559970 Kumar et al. Jan 2017 B2
9571405 Pignataro et al. Feb 2017 B2
9608896 Kumar et al. Mar 2017 B2
9614739 Kumar et al. Apr 2017 B2
9660909 Guichard et al. May 2017 B2
9723106 Shen et al. Aug 2017 B2
9774533 Zhang et al. Sep 2017 B2
9794379 Kumar et al. Oct 2017 B2
9882776 Aybay et al. Jan 2018 B2
9929945 Schultz et al. Mar 2018 B2
10003530 Zhang et al. Jun 2018 B2
20010023442 Masters Sep 2001 A1
20020085562 Hufferd et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020131362 Callon Sep 2002 A1
20020156893 Pouyoul et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020167935 Nabkel et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030023879 Wray Jan 2003 A1
20030026257 Xu et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037070 Marston Feb 2003 A1
20030088698 Singh et al. May 2003 A1
20030110081 Tosaki et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120816 Berthaud et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030214913 Kan et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030226142 Rand Dec 2003 A1
20040109412 Hansson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040148391 Shannon, Sr. et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040199812 Earl Oct 2004 A1
20040213160 Regan et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040264481 Darling et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268357 Joy et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050044197 Lai Feb 2005 A1
20050058118 Davis Mar 2005 A1
20050060572 Kung Mar 2005 A1
20050086367 Conta et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050120101 Nocera Jun 2005 A1
20050152378 Bango et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050157645 Rabie et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050160180 Rabje et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050204042 Banerjee et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050210096 Bishop et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050257002 Nguyen Nov 2005 A1
20050281257 Yazaki et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050286540 Hurtta et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289244 Sahu et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060005240 Sundarrajan et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060031374 Lu et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060045024 Previdi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074502 Mcfarland Apr 2006 A1
20060092950 Arregoces et al. May 2006 A1
20060095960 Arregoces et al. May 2006 A1
20060112400 Zhang et al. May 2006 A1
20060155862 Kathi et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060168223 Mishra et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060221844 Subramanian et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060233106 Achlioptas et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060233155 Srivastava Oct 2006 A1
20070061441 Landis et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067435 Landis et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070094397 Krelbaum et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070143851 Nicodemus et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070237147 Quinn et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250836 Li et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080056153 Liu Mar 2008 A1
20080080509 Khanna et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080080517 Roy et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080170542 Hu Jul 2008 A1
20080177896 Quinn et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181118 Sharma et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080196083 Parks et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080209039 Tracey et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080219287 Krueger et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080225710 Raja et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080291910 Tadimeti et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090003364 Fendick et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090006152 Timmerman et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037713 Khalid et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090094684 Chinnusamy et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090204612 Keshavarz-nia et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090271656 Yokota et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090300207 Giaretta et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090305699 Deshpande et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090328054 Paramasivam et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100058329 Durazzo et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100063988 Khalid Mar 2010 A1
20100080226 Khalid Apr 2010 A1
20100165985 Sharma et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191612 Raleigh Jul 2010 A1
20100211658 Hoogerwerf et al. Aug 2010 A1
20110023090 Asati et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110032833 Zhang et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110055845 Nandagopal et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110131338 Hu Jun 2011 A1
20110137991 Russell Jun 2011 A1
20110142056 Manoj Jun 2011 A1
20110161494 Mcdysan et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110222412 Kompella Sep 2011 A1
20110255538 Srinivasan et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110267947 Dhar et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120131662 Kuik et al. May 2012 A1
20120147894 Mulligan et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120324442 Barde Dec 2012 A1
20120331135 Alon et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130003735 Chao et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130003736 Szyszko et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130040640 Chen et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130044636 Koponen et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130121137 Feng et al. May 2013 A1
20130124708 Lee et al. May 2013 A1
20130163594 Sharma et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130163606 Bagepalli et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130238806 Moen Sep 2013 A1
20130272305 Lefebvre et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130311675 Kancherla Nov 2013 A1
20130329584 Ghose et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140010083 Hamdi et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140010096 Kamble et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140036730 Nellikar et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140050223 Foo et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140067758 Boldyrev et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140105062 McDysan et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140181267 Wadkins et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140254603 Banavalikar et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140259012 Nandlall et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279863 Krishnamurthy et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140280836 Kumar et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140317261 Shatzkamer et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140321459 Kumar et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140334295 Guichard et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140344439 Kempf et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140362682 Guichard et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140362857 Guichard et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140369209 Khurshid et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140376558 Rao et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150003455 Haddad et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150012584 Lo et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150012988 Jeng et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150029871 Frost et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150032871 Allan et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150052516 French et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150071285 Kumar et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150074276 DeCusatis et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150082308 Kiess et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150085635 Wijnands et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150085870 Narasimha et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150089082 Patwardhan et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150092564 Aldrin Apr 2015 A1
20150103827 Quinn et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150117308 Kant Apr 2015 A1
20150124622 Kovvali et al. May 2015 A1
20150131484 Aldrin May 2015 A1
20150131660 Shepherd et al. May 2015 A1
20150156035 Foo et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150163150 Beheshti-Zavareh et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150180725 Varney et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150180767 Tam et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150181309 Shepherd et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150188949 Mahaffey et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150195197 Yong et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150222516 Deval et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150222533 Birrittella et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150236948 Dunbar et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150319078 Lee et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150319081 Kasturi et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150326473 Dunbar et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150333930 Aysola et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150334027 Bosch et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150341285 Aysola et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150365495 Fan et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150381465 Narayanan et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150381557 Fan et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160028604 Chakrabarti et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160028640 Zhang et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160043952 Zhang et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160050117 Voellmy et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160050132 Zhang Feb 2016 A1
20160080263 Park et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160080496 Falanga et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160099853 Nedeltchev et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160119159 Zhao et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160119253 Kang et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160127139 Tian et al. May 2016 A1
20160134518 Callon et al. May 2016 A1
20160134535 Callon May 2016 A1
20160139939 Bosch et al. May 2016 A1
20160149784 Zhang et al. May 2016 A1
20160164776 Biancaniello Jun 2016 A1
20160165014 Nainar et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160173373 Guichard et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160173464 Wang et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160182336 Doctor et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160182342 Singaravelu et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160182684 Connor et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160212017 Li et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160226742 Apathotharanan et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160248685 Pignataro et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160277250 Maes Sep 2016 A1
20160285720 Mäenpää et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160323165 Boucadair et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160352629 Wang et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160380966 Gunnalan et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170019303 Swamy et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170031804 Ciszewski et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170078175 Xu et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170187609 Lee et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170208000 Bosch et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170214627 Zhang et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170237656 Gage et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170250917 Ruckstuhl et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170272470 Gundamaraju et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170279712 Nainar et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170310611 Kumar et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170331741 Fedyk et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180013841 Nainar et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180026884 Nainar et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180026887 Nainar et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180041470 Schultz et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180062991 Nainar et al. Mar 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
10376123 Apr 2014 CN
103716137 Apr 2014 CN
3160073 Apr 2017 EP
2016149686 Aug 2016 JP
WO 2011029321 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2012056404 May 2012 WO
WO 2015065353 May 2015 WO
WO 2015180559 Dec 2015 WO
WO 2015187337 Dec 2015 WO
WO 2016004556 Jan 2016 WO
WO 2016058245 Apr 2016 WO
WO 2017011607 Jan 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (65)
Entry
Aldrin, S., et al. “Service Function Chaining Operation, Administration and Maintenance Framework,” Internet Engineering Task Force, Oct. 26, 2014, 13 pages.
Alizadeh, Mohammad, et al., “CONGA: Distributed Congestion-Aware Load Balancing for Datacenters,” SIGCOMM '14, Aug. 17-22, 2014, 12 pages.
Author Unknown, “ANSI/SCTE 35 2007 Digital Program Insertion Cueing Message for Cable,” Engineering Committee, Digital Video Subcommittee, American National Standard, Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, © Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Inc. 2007 All Rights Reserved, 140 Philips Road, Exton, PA 19341; 42 pages.
Author Unknown, “AWS Lambda Developer Guide,” Amazon Web Services Inc., May 2017, 416 pages.
Author Unknown, “CEA-708,” from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Nov. 15, 2012; 16 pages http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CEA-708&oldid=523143431.
Author Unknown, “Cisco and Intel High-Performance VNFs on Cisco NFV Infrastructure,” White Paper, Cisco and Intel, Oct. 2016, 7 pages.
Author Unknown, “Cloud Functions Overview,” Cloud Functions Documentation, Mar. 21, 2017, 3 pages; https://cloud.google.com/functions/docs/concepts/overflow.
Author Unknown, “Cloud-Native VNF Modelling,” Open Source Mano, © ETSI 2016, 18 pages.
Author Unknown, “Digital Program Insertion,” from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Jan. 2, 2012; 1 page http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Digital_Program_Insertion&oldid=469076482.
Author Unknown, “Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP,” from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Oct. 25, 2012; 3 pages, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dynannic_Adaptive_Streanning_over_HTTP&oldid=519749189.
Author Unknown, “GStreamer and in-band metadata,” from RidgeRun Developer Connection, Jun. 19, 2012, 5 pages. https://developersidgerun.conn/wiki/index.php/GStreanner_and_in-band_nnetadata.
Author Unknown, “IEEE Standard for the Functional Architecture of Next Generation Service Overlay Networks, IEEE Std. 1903-2011,” IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, Oct. 7, 2011; 147 pages.
Author Unknown, “ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29, Information Technology—Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH)—Part 1: Media Presentation Description and Segment Formats,” International Standard © ISO/IEC 2012—All Rights Reserved; Jan. 5, 2012; 131 pages.
Author Unknown, “M-PEG 2 Transmission,” © Dr. Gorry Fairhurst, 9 pages [Published on or about Jan. 12, 2012] http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/future-net/digital-video/mpeg2-trans.html.
Author Unknown, “MPEG Transport Stream,” from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Nov. 11, 2012; 7 pages, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MPEG_transport_streann&oldid=522468296.
Author Unknown, “Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV); Use Cases,” ETSI, GS NFV 001 v1.1.1, Architectural Framework, © European Telecommunications Standards Institute, Oct. 2013, 50 pages.
Author Unknown, “OpenNebula 4.6 User Guide,” Jun. 12, 2014, opennebula.org, 87 pages.
Author Unknown, “Understanding Azure, A Guide for Developers,” Microsoft Corporation, Copyright © 2016 Microsoft Corporation, 39 pages.
Author Unknown, “3GPP TR 23.803 V7.0.0 (Sep. 2005) Technical Specification: Group Services and System Aspects; Evolution of Policy Control and Charging (Release 7),” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), 650 Route des Lucioles—Sophia Antipolis Val bonne—France, Sep. 2005; 30 pages.
Author Unknown, “3GPP TS 23.203 V8.9.0 (Mar. 2010) Technical Specification: Group Services and System Aspects; Policy and Charging Control Architecture (Release 8),” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), 650 Route des Lucioles—Sophia Antipolis Val bonne—France, Mar. 2010; 116 pages.
Author Unknown, “3GPP TS 23.401 V13.5.0 (Dec. 2015) Technical Specification: 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) enhancements for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) access (Release 13),” 3GPP, 650 Route des Lucioles—Sophia Antipolis Valbonne—France, Dec. 2015, 337 pages.
Author Unknown, “3GPP TS 23.401 V9.5.0 (Jun. 2010) Technical Specification: Group Services and Systems Aspects; General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) Enhancements for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) Access (Release 9),” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), 650 Route des Lucioles—Sophia Antipolis Valbonne—France, Jun. 2010; 259 pages.
Author Unknown, “3GPP TS 29.212 V13.1.0 (Mar. 2015) Technical Specification: 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control (PCC); Reference points (Release 13),” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), 650 Route des Lucioles—Sophia Antipolis Valbonne—France, Mar. 2015; 230 pages.
Author Unknown, “Service-Aware Network Architecture Based on SDN, NFV, and Network Intelligence,” 2014, 8 pages.
Baird, Andrew, et al. “AWS Serverless Multi-Tier Architectures; Using Amazon API Gateway and AWS Lambda,” Amazon Web Services Inc., Nov. 2015, 20 pages.
Bi, Jing, et al., “Dynamic Provisioning Modeling for Virtualized Multi-tier Applications in Cloud Data Center,” 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, Jul. 5, 2010, pp. 370-377, IEEE Computer Society.
Bitar, N., et al., “Interface to the Routing System (I2RS) for the Service Chaining: Use Cases and Requirements,” draft-bitar-i2rs-service-chaining-01, Feb. 14, 2014, pp. 1-15.
Bottorff, P., et al., “Ethernet MAC Chaining,” draft-fedyk-sfc-mac-chain-01.txt, Network Working Group, Broadcom, Jan. 20, 2016, pp. 1-23.
Boucadair, M., et al., “Service Function Chaining: Framework & Architecture,” Internet Draft draft-boucadair-sfc-framework-02, Feb. 12, 2014, 25 pages.
Boucadair, Mohamed, et al., “Differentiated Service Function Chaining Framework,” Network Working Group Internet Draft draft-boucadair-network-function-chaining-03, Aug. 21, 2013, 21 pages.
Bremler-Barr, Anat, et al., “Deep Packet Inspection as a Service,” CoNEXT '14, Dec. 2-5, 2014, pp. 271-282.
Cisco Systems, Inc. “Cisco NSH Service Chaining Configuration Guide,” Jul. 28, 2017, 11 pages.
Cisco Systems, Inc. “Cisco VN-LINK: Virtualization-Aware Networking,” 2009, 9 pages.
Dunbar, et al., “Architecture for Chaining Legacy Layer 4-7 Service Functions,” IETF Network Working Group Internet Draft, draft-dunbar-sfc-legacy-14-17-chain-architecture-03.txt, Feb. 10, 2014; 17 pages.
Ersue, Mehmet, “ETSI NFV Management and Orchestration-An Overview,” Presentation at the IETF# 88 Meeting, Nov. 3, 2013, 14 pages.
Farrel, A., et al., “A Path Computation Element (PCE)—Based Architecture,” RFC 4655, Network Working Group, Aug. 2006, 40 pages.
Fayaz, Seyed K., et al., “Efficient Network Reachability Analysis using a Succinct Control Plane Representation,” 2016, ratul.org, pp. 1-16.
Halpern, J., et al., “Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC 7665, Oct. 2015, 32 pages.
Hendrickson, Scott, et al. “Serverless Computation with OpenLambda,” Elastic 60, University of Wisconson, Madison, Jun. 20, 2016, 7 pages, https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/hotcloud16/hotcloud16_hendrickson.pdf.
Jiang, Y., et al., “An Architecture of Service Function Chaining,” IETF Network Working Group Internet Draft, draft-jiang-sfc-arch-01.txt, Feb. 14, 2014; 12 pages.
Jiang, Yuanlong, et al., “Fault Management in Service Function Chaining,” Network Working Group, China Telecom, Oct. 16, 2015, 13 pages.
Katsikas, Goergios P., et al., “Profiling and accelerating commodity NFV service chains with SCC,” The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 127, Jan. 2017, pp. 12-27.
Kumar, Surendra, et al., “Service Function Path Optimization: draft-kumar-sfc-sfp-optimization-00.txt,” Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF; Standard Working Draft, May 10, 2014, 14 pages.
Kumbhare, Abhijit, et al., “Opendaylight Service Function Chaining Use-Cases,” Oct. 14, 2014, 25 pages.
Li, Hongyu, “Service Function Chaining Use Cases”, IETF 88 Vancouver, Nov. 7, 2013, 7 pages.
Mortensen, A., et al., “Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Open Threat Signaling Requirements,” DOTS, Mar. 18, 2016, 16 pages; https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-dots-requirements-01.pdf.
Newman, David, “Review: FireEye fights off multi-stage malware,” Network World, May 5, 2014, 7 pages.
Nguyen, Kim-Khoa, et al. “Distributed Control Plane Architecture of Next Generation IP Routers,” IEEE, 2009, 8 pages.
Penno, Reinaldo, et al. “Packet Generation in Service Function Chains,” draft-penno-sfc-packet-03, Apr. 29, 2016, 25 pages.
Penno, Reinaldo, et al. “Services Function Chaining Traceroute,” draft-penno-sfc-trace-03, Sep. 30, 2015, 9 pages.
Pierre-Louis, Marc-Arhtur, “OpenWhisk: A quick tech preview,” DeveloperWorks Open, IBM, Feb. 22, 2016, modified Mar. 3, 2016, 7 pages; https://developer.ibm.com/open/2016/02/22/openwhisk-a-quick-tech-preview/.
Pujol, Pua Capdevila, “Deployment of NFV and SFC scenarios,” EETAC, Master Thesis, Advisor: David Rincon Rivera, Universitat Politecnica De Catalunya, Feb. 17, 2017, 115 pages.
Quinn, P., et al., “Network Service Header,” Network Working Group, Mar. 24, 2015, 42 pages; https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-00.pdf.
Quinn, P., et al., “Network Service Chaining Problem Statement,” draft-quinn-nsc-problem-statement-03.txt, Aug. 26, 2013, 18 pages.
Quinn, Paul, et al., “Network Service Header,” Network Working Group, draft-quinn-sfc-nsh-02.txt, Feb. 14, 2014, 21 pages.
Quinn, Paul, et al., “Network Service Header,” Network Working Group, draft-quinn-nsh-00.txt, Jun. 13, 2013, 20 pages.
Quinn, Paul, et al., “Network Service Header,” Network Working Group Internet Draft draft-quinn-nsh-01, Jul. 12, 2013, 20 pages.
Quinn, Paul, et al., “Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture,” Network Working Group Internet Draft draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05.txt, May 5, 2014, 31 pages.
Quinn, Paul, et al., “Service Function Chaining: Creating a Service Plane via Network Service Headers,” IEEE Computer Society, 2014, pp. 38-44.
Wong, Fei, et al., “SMPTE-TT Embedded in IDS for HTTP Live Streaming, draft-smpte-id3-http-live-streaming-00,” Informational Internet Draft, Jun. 2012, 7 pages http://ietf.org/htnnl/draft-snnpte-id3-http-live-streaming-00.
Xu, X., et al., “Service Function Chaining Using MPLS-SPRING,” draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-01, Network Working Group, Telefonica I+D, Oct. 8, 2014, pp. 1-7.
Yadav, Rishi, “What Real Cloud-Native Apps Will Look Like,” Crunch Network, posted Aug. 3, 2016, 8 pages; https://techcrunch.com/2016/08/03/what-real-cloud-native-apps-will-look-like/.
You, J., et al., “Service Function Chaining OAM in MPLS-SPRING Networks,” draft-you-mpls-spring-sfc-oam-01, MPLS Working Group, Huawei, Jan. 11, 2015, pp. 1-9.
Zhang, Cathy, et al., “L4-L7 Service Function Chaining Solution Architecture,” Open Networking Foundation, Version 1.0, Jun. 14, 2015, pp. 1-36.
Zhang, Ying, et al. “StEERING: A Software-Defined Networking for Inline Service Chaining,” IEEE, 2013, IEEE, p. 10 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190149441 A1 May 2019 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15244369 Aug 2016 US
Child 16247048 US