This application relates to the identification of users of an instant-messaging system that share common characteristics.
In instant-messaging applications, users may communicate with each other by exchanging instant messages. An individual user may have a buddy list that includes the names of other users, known as “buddies,” with whom the user may communicate regularly. The user may send instant messages to any of the buddies, as well as other users not included in the buddy list, that are logged on to their respective computing stations. Any one of these buddies may store electronic content that can be shared with other users. For example, a buddy may store an “away” message that can be provided as an auto-response to other users to indicate that the buddy is presently away from his or her computing station or is otherwise unavailable to send and receive instant messages.
Away messages can serve several purposes. Many people use them to let others, such as their buddies, know exactly where they are. Others use away messages to provide creative expression, such as by publishing the lyrics of the song they just wrote or a funny quote they just heard in a movie. Recent studies have shown that individuals of certain age groups (such as college-aged adults) not only invest a fair amount of time creating multiple away messages per day, but they also spend a great deal of time reading the away messages of their buddies.
A very common use of away messages is to post your current location or activity so that buddies can easily keep track of where you are and be informed enough to join in your activity if they are up to it. Users often trust this service as a place to keep their personal information, such as contact information, so their friends can get in touch with them at any time. They use it to share information such as links to pictures, web logs (blogs), funny articles, declarations of love to a boyfriend/girlfriend, a countdown until the day they graduate, and other things of value. It is a quick way to provide a glimpse into the user's life and, in most cases, it also may provide a way to get more information about the user if a buddy wants to spend the time to do so.
In one general aspect, displaying electronic information in an instant-messaging application includes accessing a first electronic message that provides information describing a first user that has an identifier included in a set of identifiers of users of an instant messaging application. A second electronic message that provides information describing a second user that has an identifier included in the set of identifiers of users of an instant messaging application is accessed. Content contained within the first and second electronic messages is analyzed to determine that at least a portion of the content is common to both the first and second electronic messages. Based upon the content analysis, an indication of whether the first and second electronic messages include common content is provided to the user.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. For example, indicating that the first and second electronic messages included common content may include audibly indicating that the first and second electronic messages include common content. Audibly indicating that the first and second messages include common content may include playing a recorded message indicating that the first and second messages include common content, or leaving a voice message to this effect on a voicemail system used by the user.
Indicating that the first and second electronic messages include common content may include visually indicating that the first and second electronic messages include common content. Visually indicating that the first and second electronic messages include common content may include highlighting the identifiers of the first and second users within the set of identifiers, or displaying a graphical icon in proximity to the identifiers of the first and second users within the set of identifiers.
Visually indicating that the first and second electronic messages include common content also may include adding identifiers of the first and second users to a group identifying users with electronic messages that include the common content. The group may be added to the set of identifiers, for example, when more than a threshold number of identifiers of users are to be included in the group.
Indicating that the first and second electronic messages include common content may include displaying a graphical user interface that includes indications of the first and second users as users with electronic messages that include common content.
At least a portion of the first and second electronic messages may be provided to the user. The first and second users both may be available to send and receive electronic messages, or at least one of the first user and the second user may not be available to send and receive electronic messages. The first and second electronic messages may indicate locations of the first and second users, respectively.
Analyzing content contained within the first and second electronic messages may include analyzing the content to determine whether the content indicates that the first and second users are attending a common event. Analyzing content contained within the first and second electronic messages also may include analyzing the content to determine whether the content indicates that the first and second users are participating in a common activity, share a common characteristic, are at a common location, or are within a threshold distance from one another.
Accessing the first electronic message may include accessing the first electronic message from a store of electronic messages that provide information describing the first user.
Other electronic messages for other users may be accessed. Content included in the other electronic messages may be analyzed to determine whether one or more of the other electronic messages include the common content. An indication that the one or more of the other messages include the common content may be provided to the user.
A change in the first electronic message may be detected before accessing the first electronic message. The set of users may be a list of users for which presence information is monitored, or a set of users sharing a common characteristic.
In another general aspect, displaying electronic information in an instant-messaging application includes detecting that a first user that has an identifier included in a set of users of an instant messaging application is in physical proximity to a geographic location. A detection that a second user that has an identifier included in the set of users of the instant messaging application is in physical proximity to the geographic location is made. Without receiving a request, an indication that the first and second users are each in physical proximity to the geographic location is provided.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. For example, detecting that the first user is in physical proximity to the geographic location may include detecting that the first user is within a threshold distance from the geographic location at a time when the detection is made. Detecting that the second user is in physical proximity to the geographic location may include detecting that the second user is within a threshold distance from the geographic location at a time when the detection is made.
Detecting that the first user is in physical proximity to the geographic location may include detecting that the first user is in physical proximity to the geographic location based on GPS signals indicating a position of the first user, or based on information included in an electronic message describing the first user.
A detection that the first user is not in physical proximity to the geographic location may be made. The indication that the first and second users are each in physical proximity to the geographic location may be updated based on the detection that the first user is not in physical proximity to the geographic location.
A detection that the user is in physical proximity to the geographic location may be made. Indicating that the first and second users are each in physical proximity to the geographic location may include indicating that the first and second users are each in physical proximity to the user. Detecting that the user is in physical proximity to the geographic location may include doing so based on GPS signals indicating a position of the user, or based on information included in an electronic message describing the user. Detecting that the user is in physical proximity to the geographic location may include receiving an indication that the user is in physical proximity to the geographic location from the user.
The geographic location may represent at least one from a group including a building, a street, an intersection, a business, and a residence. The set of users may be a list of users for which presence information is monitored, or a set of users sharing a common characteristic.
The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Users that share common characteristics are identified based on electronic content that is stored in association with the users. The electronic content of a user may be an electronic message indicating the availability of the user to send and receive electronic messages, or information describing the user. The users may be said to match when at least a portion of the electronic content of each of the users matches. For example, the electronic content may identify locations of the users, and the users may be identified when their locations match. The users may be included in a contact list, and an indication of the common characteristics may be presented on an interface in which the contact list is presented. Alternatively, the users may be included in another group of users that do not form a contact list, in which case the indication of the common characteristics may be presented on a standalone interface. For example, identifiers of the users with matching electronic content may be displayed in the participant list in a special group, or with nearby indications of the matching content.
During operation, the client device 108a may initiate an instant-messaging session with the client device 108b and send one or more IMs to the client device 108b during the instant-messaging session. To do so, the client device 108a invokes an IM application 110a.In one implementation, a first user manually invokes the IM application 110a.In another implementation, the client device 108a automatically invokes the IM application 110a at start-up. The client device 108a also may include various other applications that operate at run-time, such as word-processing applications, web-browser applications, or mail applications. When a first user on the client device 108a wishes to begin an instant-messaging session with a second user on the client device 108b, the first user initiates a request. This request includes an address associated with the client device 108b.The IM application 110a on the client device 108a sends this request to an IM manager application 104 on the IM server 102 using the network 106.
Upon receipt of this request from the client device 108a, the IM manager application 104 uses the address contained within the request to locate the client device 108b.The IM manager application 104 then routes the request to an IM application 110b on the client device 108b using the network 106. The IM application 110b then processes this request and initiates a new instant-messaging session with the IM application 110a on the client device 108a.The second user on the client device 108b is then notified by the IM application 110b of the new session, and the first and second users of the client devices 108a and 108b are capable of exchanging IMs during the course of the instant-messaging session. The client device 108b also may contain other applications, such as word-processing applications, web-browser applications, or mail applications.
In one implementation, the client device 108a is capable of sending messages to and receiving messages from the client device 108b through the network 106 without the use of the IM server 102. In this implementation, the IM applications 110a and 110b manage all of the IM functionality on the client devices 108a and 108b, respectively. Each of the IM applications 110a and 110b is capable of authenticating and locating other client devices to enable the exchange of messages to and from the client devices 108a and 108b, respectively.
The client devices 108a and 108b include away message repositories 112a and 112b.The away message repository 112a includes one or more away messages that have been specified by a user of the client device 108a.Each of the away messages may include information describing the user. For example, an away message may include an indication of a current location or activity of the user. In addition, the away message may include an indication of the availability of the user to send and receive instant messages. Furthermore, the away message may be identifiable by a title that may be considered to be part of the away message. In one implementation, the away message may include a profile of the user. The away messages included in the away message repositories 112a and 112b may include audio data, video data, graphical data, emoticons, and/or text.
The away message repositories 112a and 112b may include multiple types of away messages. For example, the repositories 112a and 112b may include online away messages for a user that are provided when the user is available to send and receive electronic messages. Similarly, the repositories 112a and 112b may include offline away messages for a user, which are away messages that are provided when the user is not available to send and receive electronic messages. The repositories also may include profiles that include information describing the user. Location away messages, which specify only user location, and mobile away messages, which are used when the client devices 112a and 112b are mobile devices, also may be stored within the repositories 112a and 112b.
The user of the client device 108a may make one of the away messages stored in the away message repository 112a accessible to the client device 108b such that the away message may be transferred to the client device 108b for processing or for presentation to a user of the client device 108b.The user of the client device 108a may select one of the away messages from the away message repository 112a based on the information included in the away message. If none of the stored away messages include desirable information, then the user may specify a new away message including the desirable information for storage in the repository 112a.In some implementations, the user of the client device 108a may make multiple away messages included in the repository 112a accessible for transfer to the client device 108b and other client devices. The away message that is provided to the other client device may depend on an identity of a user of the other client device. For example, a first away message may be provided when the user of the other client device is a mother of the user of the client device 108a, and a second away message may be provided when the user of the other client device is a friend of the user of the client device 108a.
In one implementation, the away message repositories 112a and 112b may include old away messages that are no longer applicable to the corresponding users. For example, when the user of the client system 108a modifies an original away message, the away message repository 112a may maintain a copy of the original away message as well as the modified away message. The old away messages may be made accessible, for example, in the form of a web log (e.g., blog) such that more than just a most recent away message is accessible. Consequently, other users or systems that access the web log may be provided with indications of previous events, activities, locations, or characteristics of the user, as well as indications of more recent events, activities, locations, or characteristics of the user.
In some implementations, the IM application 110a or the IM application 110b may be configured to respond automatically to instant messages received at the client devices 108a and 108b. In addition, the IM applications 110a and 110b may be configured to perform some function identified by the received instant messages. For example, the client device 108a may represent a mobile device used by a user, and the client device 108b may be a desktop computer used by the user. In such a case, the mobile device may not include the away message repository 112a, due to limited storage and processing capabilities. Instead, away messages for the user may be provided from the away message repository 112b included in the desktop computer. The user may send an instant message from the mobile device to the desktop computer identifying an away message included in the away message repository 112b to be made available to other users. The automatic response to the received instant message may indicate that the identified away message has been made available to the other users.
In some implementations, the users of the client devices 108a and 108b may specify user information feeds that periodically provide to other users information relating to the users. Alternatively or additionally, the IM server 102 may be configured to aggregate the information relating to the users into the user information feeds on behalf of the users. The user information feed for a user may include any information related to the user, such as entries included in an online journal of the user, an away message of the user, a profile of the user, media files of interest to the user, a playlist specifying an order in which the user listens to or watches the media files, recent communications sent and received by the user, and RSS feeds of interest to the user. The client devices 108a and 108b or the IM server 102 may periodically provide the user information feeds to other users who have subscribed to the information feeds. Alternatively or additionally, the client devices 108a and 108b or the IM server 102 may provide only portions of a user information feed that have been added or changed since a previous distribution of the user information feed.
Referring to
The participant list interface 200 includes a text box 205 that contains the participant list for the given user, who is identified by an identifier “MyUser,” as indicated in the title bar 203 of the participant list interface 200. The participant list in the participant list interface 200 includes multiple identifiers 210a-210h.More particularly, the participant list includes the identifiers “Buddy1 ” 210a, “Buddy2 ” 210b,
“Buddy3 ” 210c, “Mom” 210d, “Dad” 210e, “Sister” 210g, “Boss” 210e, and “Secretary” 210h.
Each of the identifiers 210a-210h may be selected to initiate communication with a corresponding user, or to retrieve information describing the corresponding user. In one implementation, selecting one of the identifiers 210a-210h displays a menu from which an option for initiating communication with a corresponding user or an option for retrieving information describing the corresponding user may be selected. In another implementation, an icon may be displayed next to one of the identifiers 210a-210h to indicate that a corresponding user has made available self-descriptive information. The self-descriptive information may include a profile of the other user, an electronic message describing the user, or an electronic message indicating the availability of the other user to send and receive instant messages.
The identifiers within the participant list shown by participant list interface 200 are organized into multiple groups 215a-215d. Each identifier within the participant list is associated with at least one of the groups 215a-215d. The participant list includes a “Buddies” group 215a, a “Family” group 215b, a “Work” group 215c and an “Offline” group 215d. The identifier 210a appears below the heading for the group 215a because the identifier 210a has been associated with the group 215a and the corresponding user is present, that is, logged into the instant messaging system. The heading for each of the groups 215a-215c indicates the number of users in the group currently logged into the instant messaging system, as well as the total number of users in the group. For example, three out of the three members of the group 215a are logged into the instant messaging system for which the participant list interface 200 is displayed. Similarly, the heading for the “Offline” group 215d indicates the number of other users on the participant list that are not logged into the system (i.e., 0) and the total number of other users on the participant list (i.e., 8). Typically, when users log into the instant messaging system, identifiers of the users are moved from the “Offline” group 215d to one of the other groups 215a-215c.
The participant list interface 200 also includes controls 220 that enable the given user to communicate with the other selected users corresponding to the identifiers 210a-210e. For example, the given user may send instant messages, chat invitations, text messages, or e-mail messages to the communications identities referenced in the participant list through use of the controls 220. The controls 220 also enable the user to obtain information describing the other users, as well as to modify the set of other users referenced in the participant list interface 200.
The participant list interface 200 also includes controls 225 that enable the given user to access other information not directly related to sending and receiving instant messages. For example, the given user may use the controls to access e-mail messages or other special features of the instant messaging system. The given user also may use the controls 225 to modify preferences for the participant list interface 200.
Referring to
The message list 305 includes a label for each of the away messages. When one of the labels is selected from the message list 305, a corresponding away message is displayed in the message text box 310. In addition, selecting a label from the message list 305 identifies a corresponding away message for distribution to other users desiring information describing the user. Selecting the remove button 325 after one of the away messages has been selected from the list 305 causes a corresponding away message to be removed from the set of away messages. Consequently, the selected label is removed from the list 305.
Referring also to
The away message specification interface 400 includes a label text box 405, a message text box 410, and text controls 412 with which the away message may be specified. A checkbox 422 causes the away message to be posted to a web log (blog) of the user when selected. A checkbox 415 causes the away message to be saved for later use when selected. Selecting a button 425 indicates that specification of the away message is complete, and selecting a button 430 dismisses the interface 400 without using the away message.
A label for the away message may be specified in the label text box 405. If the away message is added to the set of away messages, the label specified in the label text box 405 is listed in the message list 305. The text of the away message may be specified in the text box 410. The text controls 412 may be used to change the appearance of the text included in the text box. For example, the size, foreground color, background color, and typeface of the text may be modified with the controls 412. In addition, special characters and features, such as emoticons and hyperlinks may be inserted into the text with the controls 412.
Selecting the checkbox 415 causes the away message to be posted to a blog of the user. In one implementation, an indication of the time at which the away message was specified with the interface 400 also may be posted to the blog. Posting away messages to the blog of the user as the away messages are specified provides a history of previously specified away messages. Because each away message includes information describing the user, the blog includes historical information describing the user at various points in time. Access to the blog, or to particular away messages included in the blog, may be limited by privacy preferences set by the user. For example, the user may indicate that the blog is accessible to all users, to no users, or only to users included in the user's participant list.
Selecting the checkbox 420 causes the away message to be added to the set of away messages displayed in the interface 300. Specifically, the label specified in the label text box 405 is listed in the message list 305, and the text of the away message specified in the text box 410 may be displayed in the message text box 310 when the label is selected from the list 305.
Selecting the button 425 indicates that specification of the away message is complete. As a result, the away message may be provided to users desiring information describing the user. In one implementation, selecting the button 425 selects the away message for distribution to the users and also adds the away message to the set of away messages reflected by the interface 300. In another implementation, selecting the button 425 simply adds the away message to the set of away messages. In such an implementation, the user may use the interface 300 to select the away message for distribution, as described above.
Selecting the button 430 discards the away message that has been specified with the interface 400. For example, if a new message is being created, then the entire message is discarded when the button 430 is selected. If an existing away message is being edited, then changes made to the existing away message are discarded when the button 430 is selected. Selecting either of the buttons 425 and 430 causes the interface 400 to be dismissed.
Referring to
According to one or more embodiments, the interface 440 can provide a plurality of potential descriptions of the location of the mobile device based on location information associated with the mobile device. The geographic location indicator 445 can provide an indication of a geographic location of the mobile device. Based on the location information of the mobile device (e.g., GPS information), the interface 440 can provide a list of descriptions of one or more nearby entities or locations in the selection list 450. For example, the interface 440 can present the user with options that are known to correspond to the current geographic location of the user's mobile device. Additionally, or alternatively, the text box 455 can allow the user to provide a customized location near the location of the mobile device.
The user can select a description from the selection list 450 or enter a description in the text box 455 to indicate a geographic location associated with the location of the mobile device. Selecting a description from the selection list 450 (e.g., by choosing the description from the selection list 450 and pressing the button 460) can cause the away message to be updated with geographic location information for the user. For example, selecting a description causes the away message to be updated with the location, coordinate data, entity or address associated with the location of the selected description.
Referring to
Referring to
The instant messaging interface 600 includes a message history box 605 that lists the instant messages sent between the sender and the recipient. The message history box 605 also may be referred to as a message transcript box 605. Each message is presented with an indication of an identifier by which the sender or the recipient is identified as the sender of the message. Each message listed in the message history box 605 also includes the text of the instant message sent by the sender or the recipient. For example, the message history box 605 includes a message 610 sent by a user with a screen name “MyUser” and a message 615 sent by a user with a screen name “Buddy1.” In one implementation, each message listed in the message history box 605 includes a time stamp of when the message was sent. The users that sent the messages 610 and 615 are the recipient and the sender, respectively. In some implementations, the message history box may include automatically sent messages that were not specified manually by the sender of the recipient. For example, the automatically sent messages may inform the recipient that the sender has not used the instant messaging interface 600 for more than a threshold amount of time.
In typical implementations, the message history box 605 includes only those instant messages sent between the sender and the recipient after the interface 600 was displayed initially. In other implementations, the instant messages reflected in the message history box 605 may be saved when the interface 600 is dismissed, for example, such that the message history box 605 may be repopulated with those instant messages when the interface 600 is displayed again at a later time.
The instant messaging interface 600 also includes a message specification box 620 in which the sender may specify a message to be sent to the recipient. The sender may enter text to be sent to the recipient in the message specification box 620. The instant message interface 600 includes a set of format controls 625 that may be used to format the text entered in the message specification box 620. More particularly, the controls in the set of format controls 625 enable the user to change the size, foreground color, background color, style, and effects of the text entered in the message specification box 620. The set of format controls 625 also includes controls for inserting objects that are not plain text, such as hyperlinks and emoticons, into the message specification box 620.
After a message has been specified in the message specification box 620, the message may be sent by selecting a send button 625 included in a second control set 630. After the send button 635 has been selected, the text that has been entered in the message specification box 620 is sent to the recipient, and the message specification box 620 is cleared. The message is added to the message history box 605. The message also is displayed in a message history box 605 of an instance of the instant messaging interface 600 being viewed by the recipient. Also included in the second control set 630 are controls for warning instant message senders, blocking instant messages from particular senders, or adding the sender to a participant list used by the sender.
The recipient with the identifier “Buddy1 ” may be unavailable to send and receive instant messages at a time when the sender with the identifier “MyUser” sent the message 610. As a result, the recipient may have chosen a descriptive message to be sent automatically to other users, such as the sender, that send instant messages to the recipient. The message 615 may represent such a descriptive message, which is why the message 615 is identified as an “AutoResponse from Buddy1.” The message 615 may be processed or simply presented to the sender with the instant messaging interface 600. The sender may continue to send instant messages to the recipient, if so desired.
Referring to
Identifiers 705a-705d for the users are displayed on the left side of the interface 700. Away messages 710a-710d describing the users are displayed next to the identifiers 705a-705d. A profile or a user may be displayed next to the identifier of the user in the interface 700, for example, when the profile is not included in the away message for the user, or when the user has not otherwise indicated that the profile is not to be displayed.
For example, the interface 700 includes a profile 715a of the user corresponding to the identifier 705a and a profile 715b of the user corresponding to the identifier 705d. In the illustrated implementation, the profiles 715a and 715b are displayed next to the identifiers 705a and 705d.
In some implementations, a user of the interfaces 500, 600, and 700 may be enabled to submit comments on the away messages and profiles displayed in the interfaces 500, 600, and 700. The comments may be made available to other users that view the displayed away messages and profiles. For example, the comments may be included as part of the away messages and profiles, which will result in their automatic distribution to the other users.
Referring to
The client device accesses a first electronic message describing a first user from a set of users (805). The client device also accesses a second electronic message describing a second user from the set of users (810). The first and second electronic messages may include current and previous away messages of the first and second users, profiles of the first and second users, comments on the away messages or the profiles, a blog of previous away messages of the first and second users, or indications of the locations of the first and second users. In addition, the electronic content may include other information related to the first and second users, such as information included in user information feeds for the first and second users, histories of messages exchanged with the first and second users, and other information of interest to the first and second users. If the first or second electronic message includes a hyperlink, information located at the hyperlink may be accessed and included as part of the electronic message. Consequently, the electronic messages may indicate events, activities, characteristics, and locations of the first and second users. The client device may access the first and second electronic messages from away message repositories corresponding to client systems used by the first and second users. For example, if the first user uses the client system 108b of
In one implementation, the set of users may be a participant list used by the user for whom the process 800 is being executed. In such an implementation, the first user or the second user may be the user of the participant list rather than a user included in the participant list. In another implementation, the set of users may be a set of users that share a common characteristic, such as a set of users that attended a particular college or that work for a particular employer. Alternatively or additionally, the first and second users may be selected based on their use of an electronic messaging application, such as an instant messaging application. For example, the first and second users may be selected based on times since they were last available to send and receive electronic messages, times at which they last sent electronic messages, frequencies with which they send electronic messages, amounts of time for which they have been sending electronic messages, formats of the electronic messages that they send, content of electronic messages that they send, measurements of their popularity, or other indicators of a manner in which the first and second users exchange instant messages.
The first and second users may be selected manually by the user, or automatically by the client device, for example, while processing the entire set of users. The first user or the second user may be selected in response to a change in a corresponding electronic message. The first or second user may be selected in such a case to enable determination of whether the change in the first or second electronic message results in the first and second electronic messages having common content.
The client device analyzes content included in the first and second electronic messages (815). For example, the client device may extract text included in the electronic messages. If the accessed electronic messages include content that is not textual, then the client device may generate a textual description of the non-textual content. For example, if the accessed electronic messages include audio data, the client device may convert spoken words from the audio data to text. As another example, if the accessed electronic messages include video data or an image, the client device may generate a description of what is depicted in the video data or the image. In addition, the client device may access metadata associated with the electronic message or the components thereof. If the electronic messages are away messages, then the client device also may analyze the titles of the away messages. The client device may analyze the content included in the first and second electronic messages to identify events, activities, characteristics, and locations of the first and second users.
The client device determines whether at least a portion of content is common to both the first and second electronic messages (820). For example, the client device determines whether a portion of the text included in first electronic message matches a portion of the text included in the second electronic message. The client device may use standard search techniques when determining whether the first and second electronic messages include common content. Two portions of text may be said to match if the two portions exactly match, or if the two portions have similar meanings. For example, the portions “at the bar on Lake Street” and “going to the Lake Street Pub” may be said to match because the two portions have similar meanings. The client device also may determine that a portion of content is common to both the first and second electronic messages if the first and second electronic messages both include a particular portion of non-textual content, such as an image. The client device also may determine whether the first and second electronic messages indicate a common event that both the first and second users are attending, an activity in which the both the first and second users are participating, or a common characteristic shared by the first and second users. The client device also may determine whether the first and second electronic messages indicate a common location of both the first and second users, for example, because the first and second users are within a threshold distance from one another. In other implementations, other metrics may be used to determine whether the first and second electronic messages include common content.
The client device then provides an indication of whether the first and second messages include common content (825). In one implementation, the client device provides a visual indication of the common content. For example, if the set of users forms a participant list, the visual indication may be presented on a participant list interface in which the participant list is presented to the user, such as the interface 200 of
In another implementation, the client device may provide an audible indication of the common content. For example, the client device may audibly read the identifiers of the first and second users or the common content to the user. The client device also may present a pre-recorded message to the user. Alternatively or additionally, the client device may leave a voicemail for the user in which the identifiers of the first and second users or the common content are read.
In addition, the client device may provide an indication of the first and second messages. For example, the client device may provide an indication of the common content of the first and second messages. In some implementations, the client device may provide an indication of the common content in response to a request for the common content from the user. In other implementations, the indications of the first and second users that are presented when the first and second users maintain the common content may be selected to reveal the first and second messages.
The described implementation of the process 800 identifies content shared between a set of two users. Other implementations of the process 800 may be used to identify content shared among user sets of other sizes. For example, another implementation of the process 800 may be used to identify whether a portion of content included in electronic messages associated with three users is common to all three electronic messages, and to provide an indication of the common content.
Furthermore, the process 800 may be executed multiple times for multiple different sets of users, or for multiple different subsets of the set of users. Indications of common content for each of the multiple different sets may be provided simultaneously. For example, in implementations where the set of users is a participant list, indications of common content may be provided on the participant list interface as different groups, icons, or colors of highlighting.
The process 800 may be executed automatically or in response to a user request. For example, the process 800 may be executed periodically on a recurring basis. Each time that the process 800 is executed, the user may be asked to confirm whether an indication of users that maintain common content should be presented. Furthermore, a user may be enabled to indicate that the process 800 should not be executed automatically or without a user request.
Each execution of the process 800 may update an indication of users that maintain common content that was provided in response to a previous execution of the process 800. For example, an execution of the process 800 may result in users being added to or removed from a group in the participant list that was created in response to a previous execution of the process 800. If a group becomes empty, then the group may be removed from the participant list automatically. More generally, indications of users that maintain common content may be presented until the user indicates that they no longer should be presented, for a predetermined amount of time, or while other criteria for presentation remain satisfied.
Referring to
For example, in the implementation illustrated in
In the implementation illustrated in
Referring to
In the implementations illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
The IM server detects that a first user included in a participant list of a user is in physical proximity to a geographic location (1005). The IM server also detects that a second user included in the participant list of the user is in physical proximity to the geographic location (1010). The geographic location may be a building, a street, an intersection, a business, a residence, or another location. The first and second users both may be in physical proximity to the geographic location if the first and second users are both within a threshold distance of the geographic location or of one another. The IM server may detect the geographic locations of the first and second users as the geographic locations of mobile devices used by the first and second users. The mobile devices may include Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers that may be used to detect the geographic locations of the mobile devices. Alternatively or additionally, the mobile devices may determine their geographic locations through triangulation based on distances to at least three systems with which the mobile devices communicate, such as cellular telephone towers.
In one implementation, the mobile devices may provide the geographic locations to the IM server directly. In another implementation, the mobile devices may include indications of the geographic locations in electronic messages including information describing the first and second users, and the IM server may access the geographic location from the electronic messages. In some implementations, the first and second users may be enabled to modify or augment the automatically identified geographic locations, for example, with a name.
Alternatively or additionally, the first and second users may manually specify the geographic locations. For example, the first and second users may include indications of the geographic locations in the electronic messages, and the IM server may access the electronic messages to detect the geographic locations. The IM server may access the electronic messages from away message repositories corresponding to client systems used by the first and second users. For example, if the first user uses the client system 108b of
The first and second users may be selected manually by the user of the participant list. Alternatively or additionally, the first and second users may be selected automatically by the client device, for example, while processing the entire participant list. In one implementation, the first user or the second user is the user of the participant list rather than a user included in the participant list. The first and second users may or may not be available to send and receive electronic messages. The first user or the second user may be selected in response to a change in a corresponding electronic message. In such a case, the first or second user may be selected to enable determination of whether the change in the first or second electronic message results in the first and second electronic messages having common content.
Without first receiving a request from the user of the participant list, the IM server provides an indication that the first and second users are each in physical proximity to the geographic location (1015). In one implementation, the client device provides a visual indication of the common location on a participant list interface in which the participant list is presented to the user, such as the interface 200 of
The IM server may continue to detect the geographic locations of the first and second users, as described above. The IM server may automatically update the indication that the first and second users are each in physical proximity to the geographic location based on the locations of the first and second users (1020). For example, the IM server may detect that one or both of the first and second users has moved away from the geographic location. In such a case, the IM server may remove or stop providing the indication that the first and second users are each in physical proximity to the geographic location.
The described implementation of the process 1000 identifies a location shared among a set of two users. Other implementations of the process 1000 may be used to identify a location shared among sets of users of other sizes. For example, another implementation of the process 1000 may be used to identify whether three users are in a common location, and to provide an indication of the common location.
Furthermore, the process 1000 may be executed multiple times for multiple different sets of users included in the participant list. Indications of a common location for each of the multiple different sets may be provided simultaneously. For example, indications of each of the common locations may be provided on the participant list interface as different groups, icons, or colors of highlighting.
Referring to
An additional group has been created in the participant list 205 for each of the three sets of users. For example, a group 215e has been created for the identifiers 210a and 210c, a group 215f has been created for the identifiers 210b and 210f, and a group 215g has been created for the identifiers 210b and 210e.Consequently, the identifiers 210a, 210b, 210c, 210d, 210f and 210h are associated with multiple groups within the participant list 205. Similarly, highlighting or icons may be used to visually identify the users included in each of the three sets. The highlighted identifiers or the icons may be selected to reveal information describing the three sets, for example, within a tooltip or a pop-up window.
Referring to
The GPS application 1205 is configured to determine a location of the client system 108a.The GPS application 1205 may include a GPS receiver and a location determination module. The GPS receiver is configured to communicate with the satellite devices 1210a-1210c. Based on the signals received from the satellite devices 1210a-1210c, the location determination module calculates a distance to each of the satellite devices 1210a-1210c. The location determination module then may determine the location of the client system 108a based on the calculated distances to the satellite devices 1210a-1210c. The GPS application 1205 may determine the location of the client system 108a as latitude and longitude coordinates, which are also known as GPS coordinates.
The map server 1215 provides addresses or other representations of locations identified by the GPS application 1205. For example, the GPS application 1205 may provide the map server 1215 with the latitude and longitude coordinates identifying the location of the client system 108a.In response, the map server may identify an address, a name, or another representation of the location of the client system 108a. In some implementations, the functionality provided by the map server 1215 may be included in the GPS application 1205.
The directory server 1220 also provides information about the location of the client system 108a.More particularly, given GPS coordinates or an address from the GPS application 1205 or the map server 1215, the directory server 1220 may provide a name of the location. For example, if the client system 108a is located at a business, the directory server 1220 may provide a name of the business in response to the address. As another example, if the client system 108a is located at a residence, the directory server 1220 may provide the name of a person that lives at the residence. In some implementations, the directory server also may be configured to provide additional information describing the location, such as a phone number of the location. In some implementations, the functionality provided by the directory server 1220 may be included in the GPS application 1205.
The common name repository 1225 stores alternative representations of the locations of the client system 108a that were identified by the GPS application 1205. For example, the common name repository 1225 may store names and other information describing the locations that were provided by the map server 1215 or the directory server 1220, or by a user of the client system 108a. The stored names and descriptive information for the previous locations may be used when the client system 108a is subsequently located at one of the previous locations without having to identify the name or descriptive information again.
The processor 1305 is capable of processing instructions for execution within the computing device 1300. In one implementation, the processor 1305 is a single-threaded processor. In another implementation, the processor 1305 is a multi-threaded processor. The processor 1305 is capable of processing instructions stored in the memory 1310 or on the storage device 1325 to display graphical information for a GUI on an external input/output device that is coupled to the input/output controller 1315.
The memory 1310 stores information within the computing device 1300. In one implementation, the memory 1310 is a computer-readable medium. In one implementation, the memory 1310 is a volatile memory unit. In another implementation, the memory 1310 is a non-volatile memory unit.
The input/output controller 1315 manages input/output operations for the computing device 1300. In one implementation, the input/output controller 1315 is coupled to an external input/output device, such as a keyboard, a pointing device, or a display unit that is capable of displaying various GUIs, such as the GUIs shown in the previous figures, to a user.
The GPS receiver 1320 is similar to the GPS application 1205 of
The computing device 1300 uses the network adapter 1325 to communicate with other network devices. If, for example, the client device 108a is a mobile device that includes the computing device 1300, the computing device 1300 uses its network adapter 1325 to communicate with the host server 106 over a wireless connection.
The storage device 1330 is capable of providing mass storage for the computing device 1300. In one implementation, the storage device 1330 is a computer-readable medium. In various different implementations, the storage device 1330 may be a floppy disk device, a hard disk device, an optical disk device, or a tape device.
In one implementation, a computer program product is tangibly embodied in an information carrier. The computer program product contains instructions that, when executed, perform one or more methods, such as those described above. The information carrier is a computer- or machine-readable medium, such as the memory 1310, the storage device 1330, or a propagated signal.
A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/783,597, titled “Identifying Users Sharing Common Characteristics”, and filed Mar. 4, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/815,847, titled “Identifying Users Sharing Common Characteristics”, and filed Jun. 15, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/238,130, titled “Identifying Users Sharing Common Characteristics”, and filed Sep. 29, 2005, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,265, which claims the benefit of priority to: U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/679,652, titled “Processing Information Describing Electronic Messaging Users,” and filed May 11, 2005, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/710,670, titled “Identifying Users Sharing Common Characteristics,” and filed Aug. 24, 2005. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/238,129, titled “Searching Electronic Content in Instant-messaging Applications”, and filed Sep. 29, 2005, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,814,100, and U.S. patent application Ser. No.11/238,110, titled “Personal Location Information for Mobile Devices”and filed on Sep.29, 2005, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,580.” The entire contents of all of the above applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4837798 | Cohen et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5086394 | Shapira | Feb 1992 | A |
5276905 | Hurst et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5327486 | Wolff et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5533110 | Pinard et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548637 | Heller et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5557659 | Hyde-Thomson | Sep 1996 | A |
5608786 | Gordon | Mar 1997 | A |
5694616 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5721906 | Siefert | Feb 1998 | A |
5742905 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5774670 | Montulli | Jun 1998 | A |
5793365 | Tang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796395 | de Hond | Aug 1998 | A |
5802470 | Gaulke et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5850594 | Cannon et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5867162 | O'Leary et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870744 | Sprague | Feb 1999 | A |
5872521 | Lopatukin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878219 | Vance, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893091 | Hunt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893099 | Schreiber et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5920692 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940488 | DeGrazia et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946617 | Portaro et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948058 | Kudoh et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951643 | Shelton et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951652 | Ingrassia, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954798 | Shelton et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960173 | Tang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963951 | Collins | Oct 1999 | A |
5987113 | James | Nov 1999 | A |
5991791 | Siefert | Nov 1999 | A |
5995023 | Kreft | Nov 1999 | A |
6002402 | Schacher | Dec 1999 | A |
6009413 | Webber et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012051 | Sammon, Jr. et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014135 | Fernandes | Jan 2000 | A |
6014638 | Burge et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026403 | Siefert | Feb 2000 | A |
6026429 | Jones et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041311 | Chislenko et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049533 | Norman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6065047 | Carpenter et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073138 | de l'Etraz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081830 | Schindler | Jun 2000 | A |
6085223 | Carino, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088435 | Barber et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6134432 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151584 | Papierniak et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161130 | Horvitz et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166730 | Goode et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175831 | Weinreich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199103 | Sakaguchi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212550 | Segur | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6249282 | Sutcliffe et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249740 | Ito et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260148 | Aggarwal et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269369 | Robertson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6301609 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311211 | Shaw | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314450 | Hachiya et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324541 | de l'Etraz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330590 | Cotten | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347332 | Malet et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351698 | Kubota et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363392 | Halstead et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374246 | Matsuo | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374290 | Scharber et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389127 | Vardi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389372 | Glance et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400381 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415318 | Aggarwal et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421439 | Liffick | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421709 | McCormick et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425012 | Trovato et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430604 | Ogle et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434599 | Porter | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446112 | Bunney et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449344 | Goldfinger et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449634 | Capiel | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480885 | Olivier | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484196 | Maurille | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501834 | Milewski et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507866 | Barchi | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6525747 | Bezos | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535586 | Cloutier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539421 | Appelman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545660 | Shen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549937 | Auerbach et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557027 | Cragun | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559863 | Megiddo | May 2003 | B1 |
6571234 | Knight et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6580790 | Henry et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6606647 | Shah et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615241 | Miller et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636733 | Helferich | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640230 | Alexander et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654683 | Jin et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665173 | Brandenberg et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677968 | Appelman | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678719 | Stimmel | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691162 | Wick | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697807 | McGeachie | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701348 | Sommerer | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714791 | Friedman | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714793 | Carey et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731308 | Tang et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732155 | Meek | May 2004 | B2 |
6750881 | Appelman | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772188 | Cloutier | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781608 | Crawford | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785554 | Amerga | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785681 | Keskar et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788769 | Waites | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799039 | Wu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800031 | Di Cesare | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6834195 | Brandenberg et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839737 | Friskel | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6901559 | Blum et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904026 | Tarnanen et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6907243 | Patel | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912563 | Parker et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912564 | Appelman et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917965 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6941345 | Kapil et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950861 | Amro et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6968179 | De Vries | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6993564 | Whitten, II | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7031724 | Ross et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035865 | Doss et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7058036 | Yu et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058690 | Maehiro | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068309 | Toyama et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7082047 | Chow | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7099862 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099921 | Engstrom et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7124123 | Roskind et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7127232 | O'Neil et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7177880 | Ruvolo | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185059 | Daniell et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190956 | Dorenbosch et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200634 | Mendiola et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202814 | Caspi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7219303 | Fish | May 2007 | B2 |
7222156 | Gupta et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7257570 | Riise et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271742 | Sheha et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275215 | Werndorfer et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7289814 | Amir et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7313760 | Grossman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7436780 | Stephens et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7606580 | Granito et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7765265 | Granito | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7890123 | Granito et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20010005861 | Mousseau et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010013050 | Shah | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010018663 | Dussell et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010044693 | Gotou et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020015061 | Maguire | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021307 | Glenn et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023132 | Tornabene et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023134 | Roskowski et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020028595 | Higashi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042816 | Bae | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059201 | Work | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065856 | Kisiel | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065894 | Dalal et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077080 | Greene | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083136 | Whitten, II | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087620 | Rouse et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091667 | Jaipuria et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095465 | Banks et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103801 | Lysons | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112181 | Smith | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116463 | Hart | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116641 | Mastrianni | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133292 | Miyaki | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133369 | Johnson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147777 | Hackbarth et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174010 | Rice, III | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175953 | Lin | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178163 | Mayer | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181703 | Logan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184089 | Tsou et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020192942 | Dinesh | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193942 | Odakura et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199095 | Bandini et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004743 | Callegari | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004855 | Dutta et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004872 | Gardi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009523 | Lindskog et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018726 | Low et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023875 | Hursey et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028524 | Keskar et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028595 | Vogt et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037112 | Fitzpatrick | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043201 | Abdelhadi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046198 | Knapp et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050916 | Ortega et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084103 | Weiner et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093580 | Thomas et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030096621 | Jana et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105822 | Gusler et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126250 | Jhanji | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131061 | Newton et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140103 | Szeto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167324 | Farnham et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182394 | Ryngler et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187813 | Goldman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040015548 | Lee | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040036649 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054729 | Fukuizumi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056901 | March et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040111369 | Lane et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117443 | Barsness | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122681 | Ruvolo | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122810 | Mayer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122855 | Ruvolo | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128356 | Bernstein et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040179039 | Blattner et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186738 | Reisman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210844 | Pettinati et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215648 | Marshall | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215721 | Szeto et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243941 | Fish | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260762 | Fish | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015432 | Cohen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021750 | Abrams | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027382 | Kirmse et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038856 | Krishnasamy et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043989 | Shifrin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044152 | Hardy et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048961 | Ribaudo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050050143 | Gusler et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060377 | Lo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076078 | Salton | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050076241 | Appelman | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080863 | Daniell | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086211 | Mayer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091327 | Koch | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101335 | Kelly et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102202 | Linden et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113123 | Torvinen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114229 | Ackley et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050153681 | Hanson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166154 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050178163 | Mayer | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197846 | Pezaris | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060005133 | Lyle et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060046743 | Mirho | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052091 | Onyon et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075044 | Fox et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060160548 | Chen | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167991 | Heikes et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168054 | Burkhart et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173824 | Bensky et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173963 | Roseway et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173985 | Moore | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060182248 | Smith et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212561 | Feng | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060256816 | Yarlagadda et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258368 | Granito et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259474 | Granito | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277187 | Roese et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070032225 | Konicek et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043828 | Famolari et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070053335 | Onyon et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070085739 | Udall | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070116037 | Moore | May 2007 | A1 |
20070149214 | Walsh et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156664 | Norton et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070210937 | Smith et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243880 | Gits et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070288852 | Fish | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080228887 | Robertson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090089316 | Kogan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100318622 | Granito et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110066947 | Pei et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106898 | Granito et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20130066993 | Granito et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130066994 | Granito et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130066995 | Granito et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073642 | Granito et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073643 | Granito et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073644 | Granito et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130157694 | Granito et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179524 | Granito et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130190019 | Granito et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0862304 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1176840 | Jan 2002 | EP |
2357932 | Jul 2001 | GB |
2368747 | May 2002 | GB |
2000-499001 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-259514 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000-284999 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001-084320 | Mar 2001 | JP |
WO 9710558 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9746955 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9816045 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9847270 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9908434 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9934628 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9948011 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0079396 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0106748 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0122258 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0124036 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0143357 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0167787 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0180079 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0198856 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0203216 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0235781 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02062039 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02073886 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2004028178 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2005086723 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2007061869 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Espinoza, “GeoNotes: Social and Navigational Aspects of Location-Based Information System.”), Ubicomp 2001, all pages. |
“A Countermeasure to Duplicate-detecting Anti-spam Techniques,” Robert J. Hall, AT&T Labs Technical Report 99.9.1, 1999, Abst. and pp. 1-26. |
“A Reputation System for Peer-to-Peer Networks,” Gupta et al., Jun. 1-3, 2003, NOSSDAV'03, Monterey, California, pp. 144-152. |
“About Internet directory services,” Outlook SR-1 (9.0.0.4527) Help File, on or before Aug. 10, 2001, p. 1. |
“Active Directory Features,” [online], Jun. 15, 1999 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/features/adlist.asp>, pp. 1-4. |
“Active Directory Service Overview,” [online], Nov. 30, 2001 [Retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retreived from the Internet <http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/business/addatasheet.asp> pp. 1-5. |
“Active Directory,” [online], [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/technologies/directory/AD/default.asp>, pp. 1-13. |
“Announce: Implementation of E-mail Spam Proposal,” Maurice L. Marvin, news.admin.net-abuse.misc, Aug. 3, 1996, 2 pages. |
“AOL Instant Messenger Windows Beta Features,” Jun. 24, 1999, 2 pages, “AOL Instant Messenger All New Version 2.0,” 2 pages, Jun. 24, 1999, “What is AOL Instant Messenger,” 3 pages, Jun. 24, 1999, “Quick Tips for Getting Started,” 5 pages, Jun. 24, 1999, “Frequently Asked Questions About AOL Instant Messenger,” 6 pages, Jun. 24, 1999. |
“AOL technology: turning complicated things into a engaging services”, 1996 Annual Report, 22 pages. |
“Benefits of Active Directory in a Windows 2000 Environment,” [online], Sep. 20, 2001 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet. <http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/business/adwin2k.asp>, pp. 1-9. |
“BestCalls.com Announces the BestCalls Technology Index,” Business Wire, Jun. 30, 1999, Business Wire, p. 1. |
“Better Bayesian Filtering,” Paul Graham, Jan. 2003, pp. 1-11, http://www.paulgraham.com/better.html. |
“Business at Cyberspeed: Brainstorm Becomes Quick Internet Hit,” Walker, Jan. 24, 1999, The Washington Post, p. A.01 (4 total pages). |
“CrushParty.com: Help,” retrieved Jun. 12, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.crushparty.com/help.jsp, 3 pages. |
“Degrees of Separation Email Spam Protection,” Halfbakery: Degrees of Separation Email Spam Protection, reprinted from http://halfbakery.com/idea/Degrees—20of—20Seperation—20Email—20Spam—20Protecti . . . printed on Mar. 1, 2004 (3 pages). |
“Digital Artifacts for Remembering and Storytelling: Post History and Social Network Fragments,” Viegas et al., retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://we.media.mit.edu/˜fviegas/papers/posthistory—snf.pdf, 10 total pages. |
“Directory Integration Can Lower Total Cost of Ownership and Increase Application Functionality,” [online], Jul. 27, 1998 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet, <http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1998/Jul98/ActivDPR.asp>, pp. 1 of 4. |
“Enterprise Identity Management with Windows 2000 and Active Directory,” [online], 1999 [retrieved on May 13, 2003] Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/ad/windows2000/evaluate/w2keims.asp?fra . . . >, pp. 1-16. |
“Finding Others Online: Reputation Systems for Social Online Spaces” Jensen et al., Apr. 20-25, 2002, CHI, Minneapolis, Minnesota, vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 447-454. |
“Hottie or Nottie? Web Site Voters Let You Know Whether you Sizzle or Fizzle,” Marino, Jul. 11, 2001, Florida Times Union, p. C.1. (2 total pages). |
“Idea for Online Networking Brings Two Entrepreneurs Together,” Patents: Idea for Online Networking Brings Two Entrepreneurs Together, reprinted from http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/01/technology/01patt.html?adxnnl+0&adxnnlx=107029 . . . , printed on Nov. 5, 2004 (3 pages). |
“Instant Messaging for Gamers,” PC Gamer, May 2004, vol. 11, No. 5, p. 28. |
“Integrating Applications with Windows 2000 and Active Directory,” [online], Oct. 2000 [retrieved on May 8, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.microsoft/technet/prodtechnol/ad/windows2000/evaluate/adappstr.asp?fra . . . >, pp. 1-12. |
“Integrating Microsoft Metadirectory Services and Active Directory,” [online], Aug. 31, 2000 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/news/bulletins/mmsma.asp>, p. 1. |
“Learning Spam: Simple Techniques for Freely-Available Software,” Bart Massey et al. Computer Science Dept., Portland, OR USA, 2003, pp. 1-14. |
“Learning to Filter Spam E-Mail: A Comparison of a Naïve Bayesian and a Memory-Based Approach,” Ion Adroutsopoulos et al., Univesrity of Athens, Sep. 2000, pp. 1-12. |
“Look up contact information from an item,” Outlook SR-1 (9.0.0. 4527) Help File, on or before Aug. 10, 2001, p. 1. |
“Lotus Instant Messaging Everyplace FAQ,” retrieved Apr. 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.lotus.com/products/product4.nsf/wdocs/249c6f083166cd3e8525d73007144407, pp. 1-3. |
“Part I: Active Directory Operations,” Active Directory Operations Guide, Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Windows 2000, Version 1.5, pp. 1-187. |
“Part II: Tasks and Procedures Appendices,” Active Directory Operations Guide, Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Windows 2000, Version 1.5, pp. 1-131. |
“Plaxo—Update Your Address Book,” Plaxo Contact Networks, Reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20030218233638/http://www.plaxo.com/ printed on Nov. 5, 2004 (available on Feb. 18, 2003) (1 page). |
“Plaxo,” Plaxo, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20041105072256/http://www.plaxo.com/ Pprinted on Nov. 5, 2004 (available on Feb. 14, 2004) ( 2pages). |
“Reflections on Friendster, Trust and Intimacy,” Danah Boyd. Ubicomp 2003, Workshop Application for the Intimate Ubiquitous Computing Workshop. Seattle, WA, Oct. 12-15, 2003. |
“Reputation Systems,” Resnick et al., Dec. 2000, Commuications of the ACM, vol. 43, No. 12, pp. 45-48. |
“RIM Road: Software: Internet & Netowrk: Webmessenger RIM J2ME/Instant Messaging,” retrieved Apr. 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.rimroad.com/software/rim1/Webmessenger-RIM-J2ME-Instant-Messaging-20 . . . , pp. 1-4. |
“Set up LDAP directory services,” Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0. 4527) Help File, on or before Aug. 10, 2001, p. 1. |
“Six Degrees—New Programs Help Companies ‘Mine Workers’ Relationships for Key Business Prospects,” William M. Bulkeley et al., Marketplace, The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 4, 2003, (3 pages). |
“Social Nets Find Friends in the VCs,” Joanna Glasner, http://www.wired.com/news , Nov. 17, 2003, pp. 1-3. |
“Social Network Fragments: An Interactive Tool for Exploring Digital Social Connections.” Danah Boyd, Jeff Potter. Sketch at SIGGRAPH 2003. San Diego, California: ACM, Jul. 27-31, 2003. |
“Social Networking for Business: Release 0.5,” Esther Dyson, Esther Dyson's Monthly Report, vol. 21, No. 10, Nov. 25, 2003, ww.edventure.com, (36 pages). |
“Social Networks: Deodorant for the Soul?,” Esther Dyson, Esther Dyson's Monthly Report, vol. 21, No. 11, Dec. 12, 2003, www.edventure.com, (36 pages). |
“Social Sites Clicking With Investors,” Washingtonpost.com: Social Sites Clicking With Investors, reprinted from http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A32066-2003Nov12?language=printer printed on Nov. 5, 2004. |
“Socialware: Multiagent Systems for Supporting Network Communities,” Hattori et al., Mar. 1999, Association for Computing Machinery, Communications of the ACM, vol. 42, Issue 3, pp. 55 ff. |
“Spoke Builds on Social Networking Patent Portfolio,” Spoke Builds on Social Networking Patent Portfolio, reprinted from http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/print.php/3073621 printed on Nov. 5, 2004 (3 pages). |
“Support Vector Machines for Spam Categorization,” Harris Drucker et al., IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 10, No. 5, Sep. 1999, pp. 1048-1054. |
“Support Vector Machines,” Marti Hearst, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Jul./Aug. 1998, pp. 18-28. |
“SVM-based Filtering of E-mail Spam with Content-specific Misclasssification Costs,” Aleksander Kolcz et al., TextDM'2001 (IEEE ICDM-2001 Workshop on Text Mining), San Jose, CA, 2001, pp. 1-14. |
“SWF Seeks Attractive Head Shot; To Stand Out, Online Daters Pay for Professional Photos; Cropping out the Ex-Wife,” Leiber, Nov. 19, 2003, The Wall Street Journal, p. D.1. |
“Technical Solutions for Controlling Spam,” Shane Hird, Proceedings of AUUG2002, Melbourne, Sep. 4-6, 2002, 17 pages. |
“Technology Journal—Are You Satisfied? eBay's Battle Against Fraud Rests Primarily on a Simple Concept: Customer Feedback,” Wingfield, Sep. 23, 2002, Asian Wall Street Journal, p. T.8, (4 total pages). |
“Technology Journal: Changing Chat—Instant Messaging is Taking Off, and for Some Users It's Nuzzling Out the Phone,” Nick Wingfield, Asian WSJ, Sep. 2000. |
“Telstra targets Net spammers,” J. Dudley, news.com.au Dec. 2, 2003, 2 pages. |
“Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features,” Thorsten Joachims, University of Dortmund, Computer Science Dept., LS-8 Report 23, 1998, 18 pages. |
“The first Social Software . . . a true Social Adventure,” Huminity-Social Networking, Chat Software, Create Personal Free Blogs and My Group . . . , reprinted from http://www.huminity.com/printed on Nov. 5, 2004 (2 pages). |
“The LP Wireless Messenger,” Messenger Documentation, [online]. LP Wireless, Inc., 2001 [retrieved on Nov. 2, 2002]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.lpwireless.com/messengerhelp.htm>, pp. 1-7. |
“Trillian Discussion Forums—HOWTO: Import ICQ 2003a Contact List,” retrieved Apr. 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://trillian.cc/forums/showthread.php?s+&threadid=36475, pp. 1-2. |
“Using Active Directory Service,” from Chapter 5, Microsoft Windows 2000 Administrator's Pocket Consultant, by William R. Stanek (1999). Retrieved from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/ad/windows2000/evaluate/05w2kadb.asp?fr . . . , pp. 1-6. |
“Welcome to Huminity World of Connections,” Huminity-Home, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20030228131435/www.huminity.com/default.php?internationa . . . printed on Nov. 5, 2004 (available on Feb. 2, 2003) (1 page). |
“What's new about exchanging information over the Internet,” Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.4527) Help File, on or before Aug. 10, 2001, p. 1. |
“Will You Buy a Car From This Man?,” Leander Kahney, Oct. 6, 2003, pp. 1-3. |
“Windows 2000 Directory Services,” [online], [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/technologies/directory/default.asp>, p. 1-2. |
“Working with Active Directory Domains”, from Chapter 5, Microsoft Windows 2000 Administrator's Pocket Consultant, by William R. Stanek (1999). Retrieved from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/ad/windows2000/evaluate/05w2kadb.asp?fr . . . pp. 1-10. |
“YAHOO! Messenger Makes the World a Little Smaller, More Informed”, pp. 1-2, Jun. 21, 1999. |
Alan Cohen, “Instant Messaging”, Apr. 13, 1999, PC Magazine, PC Labs, 2 pages. |
America Online Inc., “AOL Instant Messenger”, Aug. 29, 2000, Internet: www.aol.com/aim/. |
America Online Inc., “New AIM 4.7”, Sep. 27, 2001, Internet: http://aim.aol.com. |
Anand Ranganathan et al., “ConChat: A Context-Aware Chat Program”, 2002, Pervasive Computing, pp. 51-57. |
BuddyGopher—About, available on Jul. 13, 2004, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20040713002836/www.buddygopher.com/about/html on Sep. 28, 2005 (4 pgs). |
BuddyGopher—We Love Away Messages!, “BuddyGopher simultaneously checks the away messages of your favorite AIM® buddies.”, available on Sep. 24, 2004, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20040924104001/http://www.buddygopher.com/ on Sep. 28, 2005 (2 pgs). |
Carlos Jensen et al., “Finding Others Online: Reputation Systems for Social Online Spaces”, Apr. 2002, Paper: Group Spaces, pp. 447-454. |
CNET Networks Inc., “PopUp Killer”, Sep. 13, 2001, Internet: download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-6932612.html. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US03/15715, mailed Aug. 14, 2003. |
International Search Report issued in Application No. PCT/US05/08476, dated Oct. 16, 2009, 11 pages. |
International Search Report mailed Aug. 30, 2005 for International Application No. EP03731244. |
Supplementary European Search Report isssued in European Application No. EP05728303, dated Jan. 9, 2009, (4 pages). |
Courter et al., “Mastering Microsoft Outlook 2000, Premium Edition,” Sybex Inc., Alameda, California, 2000, pp. 167-169, ISBN 0-7821-2676-6. |
Dodgeball.com: mobile social software, “help: text messaging” available on Oct. 13, 2004 reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20041013034241/www.dodgeball.com/social/help—text.php on Sep. 28, 2005 (3 pgs). |
Dodgeball.com: mobile social software, “help: the basics”, available on Oct. 9, 2004, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/20041009200739/www.dodgeball.com/social/help—basics.php on Sep. 28, 2005 (2 pgs). |
Dodgeball.com: mobile social software, “help: use it”, available on Oct. 9, 2004, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20041009201853/www.dodgeball.com/social/help—useit.php on Sep. 28, 2005 (2 pgs). |
Dodgeball.com: mobile social software, “Hook up with friends. Discover what's around you”, available on Nov. 30, 2003, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20041130034344/www.dodgeball.com/social/index.php on Sep. 28, 2005 (2 pgs). |
Ed Bott and Ron Person, Using Windows 95 with Internet Explorer 4.0, Feb. 17, 1998, Que, Special Edition. |
Eschenburg, Wo laufen sie dean?, Oct. 26, 1998, pp. 92-95. |
Espinoza et al., “GeoNotes: Social and Navigational Aspects of Location-Based Information System”, 2001, Ubicomp 2001, LNCS 2201, pp. 2-17. |
Examiner's Answer in response to Appeal Brief of U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,129, mailed Jan. 14, 2009, 85 pages. |
Flicker Geotagging, <http://www.helio.com/mobile-features/mobile-gps-navigation/flickr-geotagging>, downloaded on Mar. 30, 2009 (1 page). |
Home-Tribe.net, http://washingtondc.trib.net/message/24434d1b-817b-4580-aa-42-3bffal5f26a?page=1, retrieved Dec. 13, 2004 (4 total pages). |
http://www.friendster.com, retrieved Dec. 13, 2004 (17 pages). |
Icq.anywhere, Email Features—Email Center—ICQ.com, retrieved Apr. 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.icq.com/email/popular-features.html, pp. 1-5. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 20, 2006, for International Application No. PCT/US05/07204. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 4, 2010, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/054886. |
International Search Report, Application Serial No. PCT/US05/45663, dated Apr. 11, 2008, 10 pages. |
International Search Report, Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/018286, dated Oct. 19, 2006, 12 pages. |
J.C. Cannon, “Design Guide for Directory-Enabled Application,” [online], Apr. 2001 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/enus/dnactdir/html/deal.asp?frame=true>, pp. 1-18. |
Kohda et al., IMPP: A new Instant Messaging Standard and Its Impact on Internet Business, Dec. 2000, Fujitsu Sci. Tech. J., 36, 2, pgs. 147-153. |
Mary Beth Marklein, “Students have ‘away’ with words”, Mar. 28, 2004, USA Today, “http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-03-28-away-messages-usat—x.htm”, all pages. |
McKendrick, Joesph; “Internet Call Centers: New Era in Customer Service”, Feb. 2002; V10. N2, pp. 22(4). |
Menkens et al., “IMS Social Network Application With J2ME Compatible Push-to Talk Service,” The International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies, Sep. 12-14, 2007, pp. 70-75. |
Microsoft Corporation “Introduction to Active Directory Application Mode,” Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Aug. 2002, pp. 1-13. |
Microsoft Corporation, “Active Directory Services Interface in the Microsoft Exchange 5.5 Environment,” [online], Nov. 1997 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnactdir/html/msdn—asdiexch.asp?frame=true>, pp. 1-12. |
Microsoft Corporation, “Comparing Microsoft Active Directory to Novell's NDS,” [online], Sep. 1998 [retrieved on May 13, 2003] Retrieved from the Internet <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnactdir/html/msdn—activedirvsnds.asp?frame=true>, pp. 1-17. |
Microsoft Corporation, “Using ADSI, LDAP, and Network Management Functions With Active Directory,” [online], Feb. 2002 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnactdir/html/buildingadapps.asp?frame=true>, pp. 1-9. |
Mobile Location-Based Services—4th Edition, Table of Contents (2009), http://www.reporterlinker.com/p0126704/Reportlinker-Adds-Mobile-Location-Based-Services-4th-Edition.html (5 pages). |
Multi-User Dungeon (“MUD”), <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUD>, downloaded on Mar. 23, 2009, (9 pages). |
Mutton, Paul, “PieSpy Social Network Bot Inferring and Visualizing Social Networks IRC,” Dec. 4, 2003, Internet Archive Wayback Machine http://web.archive.org/web/20031204185952/http://jibble.org/piespy, 17 pages. |
Neo Mai, Ken Neo. “Buying and selling on the internet; [Computimes, 2* Edition].” New Straits Times. Kuala Lumpur : Jun. 28, 2001. p. 53. |
Notice from the European Patent Office dated Oct. 1, 2007 concerning business methods—Journal of the European Patent Office, vol. 30, No. 11 (Nov. 1, 2007) pp. 592-593, XP007905525 ISBN: 0170-9291. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/36793, dated Apr. 22, 2004, 7 pages. |
R. Movva & W. Lai, “MSN Messenger Service 1.0 Protocol”, Aug. 1999, Internet Draft, http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-movva-msn-messenger-protocol-oo.txt, 28 pages. |
Reichard, K., “AOL, ICQ to Interoperate—But in a Limited Fashion,” Oct. 30, 2002, InstantMessagingPlanet, available at www.instantmessagingplanet.com/public/article/php/1490771. |
Ryze home page, www.ryze.com, Dec. 21, 2003, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20031221010006/http://ryze.com, printed Mar. 16, 2005, 13 pages. |
Takashi Yoshino et al., “Namba: Location-Aware Collaboration System for Shopping and Meeting”, Aug. 2002, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, pp. 470-477. |
VisiblePath webpages, www.visiblepath.org, Dec. 3, 2003 available at http://web.archive.org/web/20031203132211/http://www.visiblepath.com, printed Mar. 16, 2005, 5 pages. |
WebmasterWorld.com Inc., “HTML and Browsers”, Mar. 5, 2001, Internet: www.webmaster.com/forum21/367.htm. |
ZeroDegrees home page, www.zerodgrees.com, Jan. 24, 2004, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20040204153037/www.zerodegrees.com/home.htm, printed Mar. 16, 2005, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, Feb. 11, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, Sep. 18, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, Mar. 10, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,814, Dec. 11, 2006, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,814, Jul. 2, 2007, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,002, Jan. 9, 2007, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,002, Jan. 8, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,002, Jul. 24, 2008, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, Nov. 29, 2004, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, Jul. 6, 2005, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, Oct. 31, 2005, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, May 10, 2006, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056,May 21, 2007, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, Nov. 5, 2007, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, May 12, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/633,636, Oct. 11, 2006, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/981,460, Aug. 20, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,424, Mar. 19, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,424, Nov. 3, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/017,204, Dec. 12, 2007, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/017,204, Jun. 23, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,718, Apr. 2, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,110, Nov. 29, 2007, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,110, Jul. 9, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,110, Oct. 9, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,129, Nov. 14, 2007, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,129, May 28, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,130, Jul. 3, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,130, Nov. 13, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,130, Apr. 14, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,130, Nov. 24, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,130, Mar. 15, 2010, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/581,669, Jun. 29, 2010, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,847, Jul. 21, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,847, Nov. 9, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,847, Apr. 27, 2012, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,847, Sep. 18, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,121, Feb. 1, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,121, Sep. 3, 2013, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,182, Feb. 22, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,182, Jun. 6, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,182, Oct. 25, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,198, Feb. 22, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,198, Jun. 10, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,198, Oct. 28, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,207, Mar. 1, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,207, Jun. 10, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,207, Oct. 28, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,246, Sep. 13, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,254, Sep. 13, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,263, Sep. 19, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,440, Jul. 19, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/783,597, Nov. 13, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,482, Sep. 19, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,847, Dec. 6, 2013, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,121, Dec. 5, 2013, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,847, Feb. 13, 2014, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,182, Mar. 20, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,198, Mar. 20, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,207, Mar. 21, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,246, Feb. 19, 2014, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,254, Feb. 20, 2014, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,263, Feb. 24, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,263, Jun. 10, 2014, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,440, Mar. 28, 2014, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,440, Apr. 23, 2014, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,482, Feb. 27, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,482, Jul. 8, 2014, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,182, Nov. 4, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,198, Nov. 3, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,207, Oct. 21, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/508,632, Aug. 3, 2015, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/508,815, Jul. 31, 2015, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/510,422, Aug. 4, 2015, Notice of Allowance. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130179525 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60710670 | Aug 2005 | US | |
60679652 | May 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13783597 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 13783946 | US | |
Parent | 12815847 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13783597 | US | |
Parent | 11238130 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 12815847 | US |