This invention relates to mechanisms for idling hydraulic devices and more particularly, although not necessarily exclusively, to apparatus for idling operation of automatic swimming pool cleaners.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,742,593 to Kallenbach depicts an exemplary “suction-side” type of hydraulic automatic pool cleaner (APC). The cleaner includes an operating head, or body, together with a foot functioning as a bearing surface (among other things). Typically connected to the foot is a disc, examples of which are illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,465,443 to Rice, et al. An outlet of the body normally communicates with a hose and thence to the inlet (i.e. the “suction side”) of a pump of a water-recirculation system associated with a swimming pool. Operation of the pump tends to evacuate the body, drawing debris-laden water from the pool into the body and thereafter into the hose. Located either within the body or remote therefrom, a mechanical filter typically strains the water before it encounters the inlet of the pump.
Present within the body is a valve designed periodically to interrupt the flow of water through the body. This periodic interruption of flow produces a water-hammer effect resulting in movement of the cleaner about the pool. Alternatively, flow through the body may operate a turbine or other device designed to drive wheels of a cleaner.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,720,068 to Clark, et al. illustrates an exemplary “pressure-side” hydraulic APC. It too comprises a body communicating via a hose with a pump, albeit with the outlet (i.e. “pressure side”) of the pump rather than with its inlet. Pressurized water (jets) exiting the body functions to move the cleaner within the pool; exploiting the Venturi principle, it also creates a low pressure region within the body for drawing pool water therein.
Both suction-side and pressure-side APCs are configured to move when connected to an operating pump. In other words, the relevant motive force creator (water-interruption valve, turbine, jet, etc.) is designed, conventionally, to be operational whenever the APC is communicating with the pump and the pump is activated. At times, though, it may be advantageous to cease movement of a cleaner without necessarily disconnecting it from or deactivating the pump. For example, if activities are occurring in one area of a pool, disabling a cleaner so as to prevent its movement into that area could be beneficial. As another example, if the pump is connected as well to some other object, reducing the force required to move the cleaner permits more pump force to be available for application to the other object.
The present invention provides means for inhibiting movement of an APC. Versions of the invention may cause pool water to bypass flowing through bodies of APCs. Alternatively, they may cause water flowing though bodies of APCs to bypass the associated motive force creators. In this sense the invention may constitute idler mechanisms, as they effectively prevent movement without requiring operation of the ultimate driver (i.e. the pump) to cease.
Also shown as defined by mechanism 10 is third opening 30. Third opening 30 is located between first and second openings 14 and 18 and preferably is a discontinuity in a wall of mechanism 10. It further may be opened and closed as desired by any suitable means. When third opening 30 is closed, mechanism 10 is essentially merely a continuation of the hose or cleaner, and water flowing from one to the other may pass through mechanism 10 unabated. By contrast, when third opening 30 is open, water may enter and exit mechanism 10 through the third opening 30 rather than (or in addition to) inlet and outlets of the APC and hose. Third opening 30 thus functions as a by-pass port when open.
Assuming mechanism 10 is used in connection with a suction-side APC, first opening 14 will be connected to an outlet of the APC and second opening 22 will be connected to an inlet of a hose whose outlet communicates with an inlet of a pump. When third opening 30 is closed, action of the pump draws pool water into and through the body, thereby causing the APC to move. However, should third opening 30 be opened, the pump will draw most (if not all) of its water directly from the pool, bypassing the body of the APC. In this instance, fluid flow through the body will be insufficient to create any substantial movement of the cleaner.
Assuming, alternatively, that mechanism 10 is used in connection with a pressure-side APC, first opening 14 will connect to an inlet of the APC and second opening 14 will be connected to an outlet of a hose. When third opening 30 is closed, water may flow through mechanism 10 from the hose into the APC. When third opening 30 is opened, however, water flows from the hose directly into the pool, again bypassing the APC and thereby preventing significant movement thereof.
One of various means for opening and closing third opening 30 is an assembly comprising a door and magnets. In one exemplary version of the invention, the door may travel in grooves to a first position closing third opening 30. Attached to the door may be a first magnet whose polarity is such that it is attracted to a second magnet attached within the wall of mechanism 10 remote from the first position. Manual force may be used to move the door to a second position opening third opening 30 and in which the first and second magnets are sufficiently proximate to allow their attractive forces to retain the door in the second position. When desired to return the door to the first position, manual force again may be used to overcome the attractive magnetic forces. Of course, persons skilled in the relevant fields will be aware that many other means and assemblies may be used instead to open and close third opening 30.
Illustrated in
Also included as part of device 10′ is housing 22′. The housing 22′ may be made of any suitable material and comprise any number of components; preferably, however, housing 22′ is molded of plastic material into a single unit. Connected to housing 22′ may be a barrier in the form of valve or door 26′ (or otherwise). When door 26′ is closed (as shown in
Depicted in
Exemplary flow through device 10′ when door 26′ is closed is depicted in
Secondary flow path SFP also exists within device 10′. As currently configured, device 10′ accepts a fraction of the fluid flowing through inlet 14′ into secondary flow path SFP via filter 50′ and secondary inlet 54′. This fraction of diverted fluid then encounters turbine generator 30′, causing generator 30′ to produce electricity, and thereafter passes through secondary outlet 58′ for return to the primary flow path PFP for transit to outlet 18′. The region in which the diverted fluid travels between secondary inlet 54′ and secondary outlet 58′ forms second pathway 62′. At least because generator 30′ is present therein (if not also because of its size and shape), second pathway 62′ is more restrictive of fluid flow than is first pathway 46′.
When door 26′ is open, as in
The foregoing is provided for purposes of illustrating, explaining, and describing embodiments of the present invention. Modifications and adaptations to these embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. The contents of the Kallenbach and Clark patents and the Kennedy application are incorporated herein in their entireties by this reference.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/340,353, filed Mar. 16, 2010, and of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/406,589, filed Oct. 26, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
716650 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 1902 | A |
2436683 | Wood, Jr. | Feb 1948 | A |
3750001 | McCloskey | Jul 1973 | A |
3845291 | Portyrata | Oct 1974 | A |
4246753 | Redmond | Jan 1981 | A |
4272686 | Suzuki | Jun 1981 | A |
4352025 | Troyen | Sep 1982 | A |
4408127 | Santos, Sr. | Oct 1983 | A |
4616298 | Bolson | Oct 1986 | A |
4742593 | Kallenbach | May 1988 | A |
RE32870 | Houston et al. | Feb 1989 | E |
4918369 | Solorow | Apr 1990 | A |
5228964 | Middleby | Jul 1993 | A |
5465443 | Rice et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5720068 | Clark et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5904171 | Stahle et al. | May 1999 | A |
6125492 | Prowse | Oct 2000 | A |
6484743 | Bauckman | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6798080 | Baarman et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6864591 | DeFrank | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6981650 | Uy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7019411 | Satou et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7036951 | St-Hilaire | May 2006 | B2 |
7067936 | Baarman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7117554 | Pichon | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7233078 | Baarman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7284565 | Sebor | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7357599 | Cripps | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7398138 | Emery et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8092675 | Kennedy | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20050248161 | Heidel | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20080189885 | Erlich et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20110064626 | Kennedy | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110226361 | Van Der Meijden et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120110727 | Uy et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
649515 | Aug 1992 | AU |
19808328 | Sep 1999 | DE |
1348913 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1553356 | Jul 2005 | EP |
WO0155589 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2009104020 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2011116046 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 21, 2011 in related Application No. PCT/US2011/028593. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 10, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/051683. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 27, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/028593. |
Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search Report dated Jan. 3, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/051683. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/051683. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110226361 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61340353 | Mar 2010 | US | |
61406589 | Oct 2010 | US |