Carbon Dioxide emitted from power plants is considered to be a greenhouse gas that needs to be removed and sequestered. In existing Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) technology, pre-combustion capture of CO2 is preferred.
Membranes may be incorporated into these systems to assist with CO2 removal. To date, however, application of membranes to IGCC applications has been limited to streams which predominantly consist of hydrocarbons.
In conventional ICCC systems (
A feed gas 22 downstream of the water gas shift reactor enters one side of the membrane while a sweeping media 24 (e.g., steam) enters the other side of the membrane. As the gas travels between the envelopes, CO2, H2S, and other highly permeable compounds permeate into the envelope. Thus, the feed gas 22 is separated into a syngas rich stream 26 which is used as fuel in the gas turbine and a permeate stream 28 rich in CO2 and H2S which is further separated in the sulfur removal system 16.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the driving force for transport for each gas component through the membrane is a difference in partial pressure on the feed and permeate sides. The partial pressure of each component in a gas stream is the product of the mole fraction of the component and the total pressure. The actual rate of gas transport for each component is the product of the permeability of said component and the partial pressure difference. The selectivity of a membrane refers to the relative permeabilities of different components. For example, a membrane with a CO2/H2 selectivity of ten (10) would have a CO2 permeability ten (10) times greater than its H2 permeability.
The pressure ratio refers to the ratio of the total pressure of the feed and the permeate. To maximize the flux through a membrane, it is desirable to operate the process with large pressure ratios. However, excessive pressure ratios can lead to mechanical failure of the membrane. A sweep stream can be introduced on the permeate side of the membrane to maintain the low pressure ratios, while also retaining a high partial pressure driving force for gas transport.
Although membrane systems offer numerous advantages over more traditional methods of CO2 removal (including reduced capital costs, lower operating costs, and operational simplicity and increased reliability), there may be significant performance losses due to the adoption of existing solvent-based sulfur removal configurations. Accordingly, there exists a need to provide a sulfur removal system and CO2 selective membrane having improved efficiency.
Embodiments of the present invention address the above-described needs by providing an integrated system for CO2 removal and acid gas removal for an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) and methods for improving the efficiency of IGCC systems comprising the integrated system for CO2 & sulfur removal.
In one embodiment, an integrated system for CO2 removal and sulfur removal for an integrated gasification combined cycle is provided comprising a CO2 selective membrane for separating a feed gas into a syngas rich stream and a CO2 rich permeate gas stream at a first pressure; a pre-compressor downstream of the CO2 selective membrane for increasing the permeate gas stream from a first pressure to a second pressure higher than the first pressure; and a sulfur removal system downstream of the pre-compressor.
In one embodiment, a method for improving the efficiency of an IGCC system also is provided comprising introducing a feed gas stream to a CO2 selective membrane for separation into a syngas rich stream and a permeate gas stream, wherein the permeate gas stream is at a first pressure; increasing the permeate gas stream from the first pressure to a second pressure; and introducing the permeate gas stream at the second pressure to a sulfur removal system downstream of the pre-compressor.
In one embodiment, an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) also is provided comprising a high-pressure radiant only gasifier; an air separation unit; a catalytic water-gas-shift reactor and low temperature gas cooling section; a CO2 selective membrane for separating a feed gas into a syngas rich stream and a permeate gas stream at a first pressure; a pre-compressor downstream of the CO2 selective membrane for increasing the permeate gas stream from a first pressure to a second pressure higher than the first pressure; a sulfur removal system downstream of the pre-compressor; and an advanced syngas-fueled gas turbine power cycle.
The efficiency of an IGCC system with CO2 capture using membranes is reduced due to use of conventional AGR configurations. The key reasons for this performance penalty are due to the lower permeate stream (CO2 & H2S) pressure, which drives higher auxiliary loads. Embodiments of the present invention provide system design solutions to help maintain a substantially constant pressure gas stream at the inlet to the sulfur removal system, thereby significantly reducing the re-boiling steam requirement and consequently improving the IGCC system net output and heat rate.
Embodiments of the present invention are based on pre-compression of the permeate gas streams exiting the CO2 membrane reactor subsequent to the heat recovery from the LTGC. Pre-compression assists in providing a substantially constant pressure at the inlet of the sulfur removal system pressure irrespective of the CO2 membrane sweep pressure. By increasing the pressure of the permeate, the sulfur removal system performance is improved greatly, driving the cost of such systems lower.
Generally described, the modified IGCC system comprises a gasifier; an air separation unit (ASU); a catalytic water-gas-shift reactor and low temperature gas cooling section; a CO2 selective membrane; a modified additional product cleaning, H2S removal and sulfur recovery in a sulfur removal system; and an advanced syngas-fueled gas turbine power cycle.
One embodiment of a modified IGCC system is schematically illustrated in
The modified IGCC system (
Those of ordinary skill in the art should appreciate that any suitable compressor may be used as the pre-compressor in the embodiments provided herein so long as it is capable of increasing the pressure of the LTGC outlet stream prior to its entry into the sulfur removal system. Non-limiting examples of compressors, which may be suitable include a centrifugal compressor, an axial flow compressor, a reciprocating compressor, or a rotary compressor.
CO2 selective membranes 120 and sulfur removal systems 119 suitable for use in the embodiments provided herein are known to those of skill in the art. Non-limiting examples of suitable CO2 selective membranes are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,396,382 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0011161 and No. 2008/0127632, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional non-limiting examples of membranes suitable for use in embodiments include polymeric membranes, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,011,694. Although these polymeric membranes are limited in temperature, and may also have limitations in operating pressure envelopes, they fall within the scope of the operating temperatures and pressures suitable for embodiments of present invention.
Non-limiting examples of suitable sulfur removal systems are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,203,599 B1; however, those skilled in the art should appreciate that any suitable sulfur removal system may be used in embodiments provided herein. An exemplary sulfur removal system 119, illustrated in
Preliminary calculations were done to explore the potential benefits of the inventions described hereinabove. One calculation evaluated the optimum pressure by identifying the point at which the sulfur removal system pre-compressor power is minimal. The results observed in these simulations are depicted in
Accordingly, in a particular embodiment the pre-compressor increases the pressure of the permeate stream 132 such that the absolute pressure ratio of the second pressure to the first pressure is in the range of about 1.5 to about 20. In other embodiments, the absolute pressure ratio of the second pressure to the first pressure is in the range of about from about 1.5 to about 15, from about 5 to about 10, about 1.5 to about 5, from about 5 to about 10, from about 10 to about 15, or any range therebetween. In one exemplary embodiment, the absolute pressure of permeate stream 132 (second pressure) for operating the sulfur removal system is about 510 psia and the absolute pressure of the permeate stream 128 (first pressure) is about 310 psia for an absolute pressure ratio of 1.6.
The advantages provided by embodiments of the claimed invention can be better explained with the following non-limiting example. An evaluation was conducted using a Hysys Platform to model a sub-system comprising a gasifier, radiant syngas cooler, air separation plant, low temperature gas clean-up system, syn-gas saturation and heating, acid gas removal and sulfur recovery unit, and CO2 compression and pumping system. Still another evaluation was conducted using a GateCycle Platform to model a sub-system comprising a bottoming cycle of a Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) and steam turbine (ST), condenser and balance of plant equipment.
As an exemplary example, an IGCC system with CO2 selective membrane with a gasifier operating at approximately 650 psig pressure, gasified the coal to generate a syngas containing CO, H2, N2, H2O, CO2 and H2S. This gas was processed using catalytic shift reactors to form a gas containing approximately 40% H2, 3% CO, 30% CO2 and 25% H2O. This gas entered the CO2 selective membrane at a pressure of approximately 580 psia. Steam used as a sweeping media, entered the permeate side of the membrane at a pressure of approximately 310 psia. The partial pressure difference across the membrane allowed for permeation of the CO2 along with the H2S.
The retentate stream rich in H2 and CO was sent to a combustion turbine as a fuel after passing through polishing membrane module. The permeate stream leaving the membrane was cooled in a LTGC (low temperature gas cooling) system and later sent to a sulfur separation system. The stream pressure of about 310 psia required additional auxiliary loads in the sulfur removal system and produced a low pressure CO2 product stream. However, addition of a pre-compressor to the system for allowed for compression of the permeate stream to a pressure of approximately 530 psia. By increasing the stream pressure to the sulfur removal system 119, the auxiliary loads required in the sulfur removal system were reduced, giving a boost to the plant performance. The separated CO2 stream was subsequently sent to the CO2 well at 2200 psia. The advantages observed in the overall plant performance are summarized in Table 1.
Still further benefits also are observed by the reduction of equipment size resulting from the increase in sulfur removal system operating pressure, allowing for a cost savings in the total plant cost.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.