The following description relates to detecting igniter events in gas turbine engines.
Determining the cause of an ignition problem in an engine (e.g., misfire) can be costly and time-consuming. It can be difficult to determine in situ whether an ignition problem is due to a problem with the electrical ignition components or a problem with a system external to the igniter (e.g., the fuel delivery system). For example, an ignition system problem could be due to insufficient voltage being supplied to the igniter, or the spark forming at an improper location (e.g. not at the igniter tip). Also the lack of ignition could be caused by inadequate fuel/air conditions. Some methods of troubleshooting ignition problems involve costly extra equipment and removing the igniter from the engine to be tested separately.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
The concepts herein relate to detecting successful igniter events of an igniter for a gas turbine engine.
The igniter 300 includes an igniter event conductor 330 coupled to a remote sensor 340. The conductor 330 communicates some aspect of the igniter event in the combustion chamber 210 from near the ignition location 320 to the sensor 340, so that the aspect can be sensed by the sensor 340. The sensor 340 can then be used to determine that an igniter event has occurred, a characteristic of the igniter event (e.g., magnitude of the event), and that the event has occurred at the ignition location 320 and not somewhere else.
As described in more detail below, the conductor 330 can take many different forms. Generally, though, the conductor 330 has a first end or portion 350 located at or near the ignition location 320, in or out of the combustion chamber 210, and another end or portion coupled to the sensor 340.
The sensor 340 is apart from the ignition location 320 and outside of the combustion chamber 210. For example, the sensor 340 can be located in the body of the igniter 300, and in certain instances, at an end of the igniter 300 away from the combustion chamber 210. The sensor 340 could be alternatively located outside of the igniter 300, for example in an enclosure remote from the combustion chamber 210 and igniter 300, and/or at another location. The conductor 330 spans the distance between the combustion chamber 210 and the sensor 340. Locating the sensor 340 away from the combustion chamber 210 can protect the sensor 340 from damage or wear due to heat and combustion by-products in the combustion chamber 210. The conductor 300 and sensor 340 can be sealed so that the ignition system remains hermetic.
In certain implementations, the conductor 330 is a pressure conductive path that communicates pressure from within combustion chamber 210 to the sensor 340 and the sensor 340 is an acoustic sensor (e.g., measuring in dB or other measure of sound) or a pressure sensor (e.g., for measuring in MPa or other measure of pressure). For example, the sensor 340 can be a piezoelectric sensor, a pressure transducer, or other type of sensor. A sound or a change in combustion chamber 210 pressure can indicate a successful igniter event. For example, a strong spark between electrodes 322, 324 of a spark-gap igniter 300 will produce an acoustic signature from the location of the spark gap that is different from the sound of a weak spark between electrodes 322, 324, a spark that shorts to another conductive component in the combustion chamber 210 or no spark at all. Similarly, a spark and/or initial igniter event at the ignition location 320 can create a pressure shockwave that emanates from the ignition location 320. As above, a strong spark between electrodes 322, 324 will produces a pressure signature from the location of the spark gap that is different from the pressure signature of a weak spark, a spark that shorts to another component or no spark at all. The conductor 330 can communicate the acoustic signature and/or change in pressure within the combustion chamber 210 to the sensor 340. In certain instances, the conductor 330 can be a hollow tube with one end 350 open to the combustion chamber 210 and the opposite end coupled to the sensor 340. In another example, the conductor 330 can be solid and made from a highly acoustically conductive material.
As discussed in more detail below, for each of the implementations described herein, the end of the conductor 330 in the combustion chamber 210 can be in a specified location and/or with a specified orientation to facilitate distinguishing igniter events at the ignition location 320 from igniter events at other locations in the combustion chamber 210. Therefore, the sensor 340 is able to distinguish both that the igniter 300 has functioned in creating a successful igniter event (e.g., has created a spark of a specified strength or greater) and that the igniter event has occurred at the ignition location 320.
In certain implementations, the conductor 330 is a light conductive path that communicates light within combustion chamber 210 to the sensor 340 and the sensor is an optical sensor. For example, the sensor 340 can be an optical sensor that detects light or light intensity, such as a photodetector and/or other sensor. An increase in light intensity within the combustion chamber 210 can indicate a successful igniter event, for example, as the spark or initial flame kernel emits light. The intensity and color of the light can indicate the strength of the igniter event. In some cases, the conductor 330 can be an optical fiber or fiberglass tube that communicates light from within the combustion chamber 210 to the sensor 340.
In certain implementations, the conductor 330 is an electrically conductive path that communicates an electrical signal from the combustion chamber 210 to the sensor 340 and the sensor 340 is an electrical sensor, such as a voltage sensor, a current sensor, and/or other electrical sensor. An electrical signature can indicate a successful igniter event. In some cases, the conductor 330 can be a metal element (e.g., a wire) or one or more electrodes and conduct the electrical signal to the sensor 340. For example, a voltage sensor or current sensor can detect an electrical interference signal. A current sensor can also detect the presence of ions from the formation of plasma in the combustion chamber 340.
In
Referring back to
Based on the sensor data and the threshold value, the controller can determine if a successful igniter event has occurred. The controller can also log if a successful igniter event has or has not occurred. After a specified number of successful or unsuccessful igniter events, the controller can send a misfire signal. For example, the controller can sound an alarm or signal a message on a display. This enables misfires to be detected without needing to remove and test the igniter or other associated part. In systems having multiple igniters 300, the controller can indicate which of the multiple igniters 300 has logged the specified number of unsuccessful ignition attempts.
While this specification contains many details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular examples. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate implementations can also be combined. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination.
A number of examples have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications can be made. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4090125 | Warner | May 1978 | A |
4636777 | Skerritt | Jan 1987 | A |
4760341 | Skerritt | Jul 1988 | A |
5499497 | DeFreitas | Mar 1996 | A |
5523691 | Frus | Jun 1996 | A |
6487899 | Wahl et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7093421 | Ponziani et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7375531 | Ponziani et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7386982 | Runkle et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7546741 | Sasao et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
9134199 | Hwang | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20050172637 | Ponziani | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050174121 | Ponziani | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060137354 | Ponziani | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20100117859 | Mitchell | May 2010 | A1 |
20100186368 | Ikeda | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120110975 | Alholm | May 2012 | A1 |
20140373609 | Hwang | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376588 | Wang | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376589 | Karp | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376590 | Hwang | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150027211 | Claussen | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150260557 | DeSilva | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1564491 | Aug 2005 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the Interantional Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/US2015/029406 dated Jul. 6, 2015. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2015/029406, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150322863 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |