The present invention is directed to a system for more accurately indicating if a spark and a flame are being produced in a fuel ignitor.
In typical gas and light oil-fueled utility burners, the gas/oil is ignited from a pilot flame on an ignitor. The ignitor must start this pilot flame. Therefore, it creates a spark from a spark rod connected to a high voltage transformer. The transformer provides high voltage electrical power (about 8 kV) to the spark rod that is adjacent to a grounded metal housing. The electrical power causes an arc (spark) to be produced between the spark rod and housing (ground). This arc occurs for a predefined time (typically 10 seconds) when the ignitor is first turned on. In prior art devices there are no external verifications that arcing is actually occurring.
The ignitor also has a flame rod located near a small fuel source, the spark rod and the housing. The spark rod creates arcing that lights the fuel from the small fuel source creating the pilot flame. The pilot flame spans the area between the flame rod and the housing. Since fire conducts electricity, this causes current to flow from the flame rod to the housing through the flame.
This current is monitored by an externally mounted electronic device. The electronic device and flame rod are referred to as a flame-proving device. The flame-proving device analyzes the flow of current from the flame rod to the housing to determine the presence of a pilot flame.
The arc from the high voltage transformer sometimes interferes with the ignitor flame-proving device, causing it to falsely indicate flame while the arc is on.
When an ignitor will not correctly light a pilot flame, the technician diagnosing the problem will usually remove the ignitor from the boiler and activate it without fuel to visually determine if an arc is being produced. This takes time and effort.
Currently, there is a need for a device that automatically determines if an ignitor is producing arcing and more accurately determines if a pilot flame is being produced.
The present invention may be embodied as an ignitor diagnostic device 100 for detecting the presence of arcing between an energized spark rod 23 and a housing 11. It employs a flame rod 25 for sensing an electromagnetic (EM) signal radiated by the spark rod 23 when energized.
A sensing device 50 is coupled to the flame rod 25 and receives the EM signal from the flame rod 25 and processing the EM signal to create a spark indication signal.
A user interface 90 adapted to provide output to a user.
A logic unit 60 is coupled to the user interface 90. The logic unit 60 is adapted to receive the spark indication signal from the sensing device 50, determine if arcing is occurring based upon the strength of the spark indication signal. The logic unit 60 provides this information to the user interface 90 to cause an output to be displayed to the user.
The spark indication signal is comprised by a plurality of periodic lobes separated by low voltage timer periods, and the logic unit 60 monitors the low voltage time periods in the spark indication signal and measures the spacing between lobes to indicate ‘health’ of the spark producing equipment.
The present invention may also be embodied as an ignitor diagnostic device 100 for more accurately determining if a pilot flame is present.
It includes a flame rod 25 for sensing an electromagnetic (EM) signal radiated by the spark rod 23 when the spark rod 23 is energized,
a sensing device 50 coupled to the flame rod 25 for receiving the EM signal from the flame rod 25 and processing the EM signal to create a spark indication signal;
a logic unit 60 adapted to receive the spark indication signal from the sensing device 50, determine if arcing is occurring based upon the strength of the spark indication signal and provide a logic signal indicating when arcing is occurring; and
a flame-proving device 70 coupled to the logic unit 60 adapted to receive the logic signal from the logic unit 60 and only test for a pilot flame when the logic signal indicates that no arcing is occurring.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a system that accurately determines if an ignitor is producing a spark.
It is another object of the present invention to indicate to a flame detector that an arc is currently being produced.
It is another object of the present invention to aid a flame detector in more accurately determining if there is currently a pilot flame burning.
It is another object of the present invention to indicate when there are problems with the spark apparatus.
It is another object of the present invention to predict failures of the spark apparatus.
The present invention may be better understood and its numerous objects and advantages will become apparent to those skilled in the art by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The following description is made with reference to
The external end 12 has a spark rod cable 33 and a flame rod cable 35 extending out to external equipment. Internally, the spark rod cable 33 connects to an electrically conductive spark rod 23. Spark rod 23 extends from the spark rod cable 33 to the internal end 13. It extends parallel to, but does not come in contact with, the outer housing 11. The outer housing 11 is electrically connected to ground. There is a predetermined gap between spark rod 23 and outer housing 11.
High voltage electric power source 3 provides electric power, preferably in the form of alternating current, through the spark rod cable 33 and to the spark rod 23. This causes pulsating arcing between the spark rod 23 and the internal end 13 of housing 11. This arcing produces high frequency electro-magnetic radiation and induces current flow in nearby conductors.
A flame rod 25 is enclosed within the outer housing 11 and extends to the internal end 13 of the pipe ignitor 10. It is positioned between the fuel tube 40 and the end of spark rod 23. This allows the flame rod 25 to be immersed in a pilot flame when the pilot flame is burning.
Flame rod 25 is connected to a flame rod cable 35 that connects ultimately to a flame-proving device that detects the presence of a pilot flame.
Referring now also to
The present inventors discovered that the flame rod 25 could act as an antenna as well as functioning to provide current through the pilot flame. It was also determined that the arcing produced by the spark rod 23 creates high frequency RF ‘splatter’ radiation that was being sensed by the flame rod 25. The characteristic AC pulsing is sensed by the flame rod 25. Therefore, it was determined that the signal sensed by the flame rod 25 can be monitored to indicate when the spark rod 23 is creating arcing. This signal also indicates that a spark is being produced. This information may also be used to determine when the spark rod and associated power source are not functioning properly. It also may be used to cause the flame-proving device to sense the flame only when no arcing is being produced, and therefore detect the flame more accurately.
The theory of the present invention is to monitor electrical signals sensed by the flame rod 25, filter out the DC and low frequencies in the sensed signal, rectify the signals, filter out the high frequencies and digitize the signal. This leaves a low frequency envelope signal that is twice the frequency of the AC current used (100 Hz. or 120 Hz.). When this signal is detected, the spark rod 23 is arcing.
The arcing of the spark rod 23 creates current that may be mistaken by the flame-proving device 70 as originating from a flame and incorrectly indicates that a flame is present when it is not. This is a false positive. Therefore, the sensing device 50 of the present invention must communicate with the flame-proving device 70 to indicate when arcing is occurring.
The flame-proving device 60 must then test for a flame only when the spark rod is not operating to detect if there is a flame.
This eliminates the interference and false-positives that occur due to the inadvertent detection of arcing and confusing the arcing with the presence of a pilot flame. This results in a more accurate flame-proving device.
The filtered signal passes through a rectifier D1 that rectifies the signal to flip the negative lobes to make them all positive. This signal is shown in
The rectified signal is provided to a low pass filter 55. Low pass filter 55 in this embodiment employs a resistor R2 and capacitor C2 that block the high frequency arcing signal to produce an envelope signal. The envelope signal has a frequency that is twice the frequency produced by the AC power supply. The signal is shown in
An analog to digital converter 57 receives the analog envelope signal and digitizes it to create a set of digital samples approximating the analog envelope signal of
A logic unit 60 senses the digitized signal provided by the ND converter 55. Logic unit 60 may be a standalone device with its own microprocessor or be part of a calculation device 80 that has a microprocessor that runs several different programs and performs several different functions. One embodiment compares the amplitude of the digitized signal with a minimum amplitude, such as a2 of
Logic unit 60 then monitors the digitized signal to identify if the signal is at periodic peaks that exceed the threshold with a regular frequency. This frequency should be double the frequency of the signal provided by the spark power supply (3 of
Logic unit 60 receives the signal from the sensing device 50 and calculates information that there is, or is not, arcing being produced. This information is provided from the logic unit 60 to the flame-proving device 70. Flame-proving device 70 is modified in this embodiment to operate when the output of the logic unit 60 indicates that no arcing is being produced. It is not allowed to operate when the logic unit 60 indicates that arcing is being performed.
In an alternative embodiment, the flame-proving device 70 is allowed to operate at all times, but readings indicating that there is a flame present while logic unit 60 indicates that arcing is being performed are ignored.
This is a time vs. amplitude plot of the envelope of the rectified waveform. As the waveform envelope reduces amplitude (input voltage), it reaches a point at time t1 that the curve drops to zero amplitude.
Similarly, as voltage is provided by the power source 3 to the spark rod 23 during the period from time=t2 to time just before t3, there is no measurable amplitude response. It is only at time=t3 that arcing begins and increases its amplitude rapidly until it follows the normal waveform envelope.
It has been determined that the health of the power source 3, spark rod 23, the spark rod cable 33 and the remainder of the connections between these units can be determined by the distances between t1 and t3.
The probability of failure may be determined not only by these distances, but by how these distances change over time.
Referring now to
Also, if the logic unit 60 is capable of storing historic data, the change over time can be determined and a prediction may be made as to when the system will fail. This can be very useful in the maintenance and repair of these ignitors.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present invention, particularly any “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the invention. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) of the invention without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2798632 | Smits | Apr 1957 | A |
2858779 | Rotzler | Nov 1958 | A |
3122196 | Schuss | Feb 1964 | A |
3238447 | Bychinsky | Mar 1966 | A |
3291183 | Fairley | Dec 1966 | A |
4033711 | Christian et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4090125 | Warner | May 1978 | A |
4518345 | Mueller et al. | May 1985 | A |
4608536 | Jacobs et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4731586 | Perkins | Mar 1988 | A |
5049063 | Kishida et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5106293 | Hawkins | Apr 1992 | A |
5470223 | McCoy | Nov 1995 | A |
5599180 | Peters et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5938424 | Kurogi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6680614 | Tekriwal et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6717412 | Moritz et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6743010 | Bridgeman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
20020160325 | Deng | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20060257804 | Chian et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090191494 | Galfrascoli et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101338913 | Jan 2009 | CN |
S62-138626 | Jun 1987 | JP |
H07280257 | Oct 1995 | JP |
H10160160 | Jun 1998 | JP |
H10285731 | Oct 1998 | JP |
2002-13731 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003-21331 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2006-118725 | May 2006 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Search Report from the Intellectual Property Office of Taiwan issued Dec. 27, 2013 for TW 100126863. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal from the Japanese Patent Office dispatched Feb. 3, 2014 for JP 2013-521804. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120028199 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |