The invention relates to X-ray imaging technology as well as image post-processing/analysis.
In particular, the present invention relates to image-based determination of a geometrical alteration of the shape of a compression element.
Particularly, the present invention relates to an image-based determination of compression paddle deflection for accurate breast density assessment in mammography applications.
Mammography is the modality of choice for screening for early breast cancer. In mammography, preferably low energy X-rays are employed for examining an object, e.g. human breast tissue, as a diagnostic and screening tool. The goal of mammography is the early detection of breast cancer, typically through detection of characteristic masses and/or micro-calcifications.
In this regard, determining breast density is an important indicator for a cancer risk. With the large amount of images generated in mammography screening programs, it is beneficial to have a reliable automatic breast density assessment (BDA) in order to support the user, e.g. a radiologist.
X-ray source 4 is exemplarily rotatable about an axis for obtaining horizontal/parallel as well as oblique image information. In standard mammography, the surface of the detector 6 is regularly always orthogonal to the line connecting X-ray detector 6 and X-ray source 4. For oblique mammographic views, the entire system 4,6,8 is rotatable, as indicated by the circular arrow in
The first compression element 8a is attached to a movable arm element 18 allowing a relative movement of the first compression element 8a relative to the second compression element 8b/X-ray detector 6. By moving the first compression element 8a with force F acting in an object distal region 22, object 10 is compressed between the first and second compression element 8a,b. Object 10 is generating a counterforce F′ in an object proximal region 20 of the first compression element 8a. Since forces F, F′ do not coincide, resulting forces are acting on the first compression element 8a. In particular, a tilt about tilt axis 14 is conceivable as well as, in case the first compression element 8a is not made of an infinite rigid material, a deflection 16 by bending the first compression element 8a. Accordingly, a known distance x between the first and the second compression element 8a,b at the object distal side 22 results in a distance x+Δx at the object proximal side 20 due to counterforce F′.
For determining breast density, precise information about the force F applied to the first compression element 8a as well as the distance x between the first and the second compression element 8a,b is required. Thus, a precise measurement of breast thickness, i.e. distance x, further taking into account additional tilt and deflection of a compression element resulting in Ax is of importance when automatically determining volumetric or mammographic breast density, from image information of digital mammograms. This procedure is also referred to as breast density assessment (BDA). Due to tilt and deflection of a compression element, the actual distance x+Δx may show deviations of Δx=5 mm from the true thickness up to even Δx=15 mm. However, even small errors of 1 to 2 mm may be considered to have a large impact on the breast density assessment, resulting in a significant misjudgement of the density.
Imprecision in compression thickness measurement may be considered significant for automatic breast density assessment. Such imprecision may result from the height or distance between the first and the second compression element being measured at the far end of the compression elements, i.e. at an object distal region or side, where compression force F is applied, while the height support or object to be examined typically only fills part of the base between the first and the second compression element near the chest wall or at an object proximal region. Additional impreciseness may be introduced by play in the connection of the gantry and paddle or arm and compression element, which may be as large as 15 mm, depending on the system and paddle.
Since even small errors may have a large impact on the estimated breast density, e.g. 1 mm may lead to about 10% misjudgement, not including other effects, e.g. varying compression height caused by paddle deflection or tilt, which cannot be estimated from a single height measurement, it may be beneficial to not only determine distance x between the first and the second compression element but also the resulting shape of a compression element in a compressed state. In other words, in a compressed state, i.e. with an object introduced between the first and second compression element, the geometry of a compression element may be altered, thereby resulting in additional variables, e.g. Δx, which have to be considered for a correct breast density assessment. To increase accuracy, marker elements are provided in one of the first and the second compression element, in particular in or on the first compression element or compression paddle, which may subsequently be detected in acquired X-ray image information and may be evaluated in an image processing step to derive a resulting geometrical shape of the respective compression element to allow determining a precise compression height x+Δx.
Aspects, features and advantages of the present invention may further be derived from the detailed description of preferred embodiments described hereinafter which are explained with reference to the following drawings.
Like elements may be referred to with like reference numerals.
The figures are not drawn to scale, however may depict qualitative proportions.
a-e show exemplary arrangements of marker elements; and
To allow a precise breast density assessment, marker elements, e.g. lead marker elements, which may be spherically, circularly or coin-shaped, may be incorporated into one of the compression elements, in particular the compression element, which is expected to be geometrically altered in the compressed state.
The marker elements, in particular X-ray opaque elements or at least partly X-ray opaque elements, may subsequently be detected in the acquired X-ray image information and may be subjected to calculations to determine an occurring misalignment and/or geometrical alteration of the shape of the respective compression element.
E.g., in case only a tilt of the compression element is assumed, three marker elements may be considered to be sufficient for determining the orientation of e.g. a planar compression element, i.e. the orientation of the plane of the compression element with respect to the other compression element.
The X-ray source may be considered to be a point source allowing a precise projection of the respective marker elements onto the X-ray detector and thus into the X-ray image information. In this case, the three marker elements should not be arranged on a single line or marker line but should be arranged so as to unambiguously determine a plane. Since the distance and alignment of the marker elements on the compression element relative to one another is assumed to be known, due to the point source nature of the X-ray source, the precise angulation of the compression element may be determined by known mathematical methods.
In case not only a tilt but also a deflection, bending or warping of the compression element has to be determined, employing only three marker elements spanning a plane may not be sufficient since the distance between the marker elements is not defined any more due to the deflection of the compression element. With small marker elements, e.g. metal spheres or coins, placed on either side of a compression element, it again may be possible to exploit the theorem or intersecting lines for deriving the compression height from the distance of the projected marker positions.
Typically, an image-based detection of the marker elements within the X-ray image information may achieve sub-pixel accuracy, exploiting the detector's point spread function (PSF) as well as focal blur. However, even an accuracy of two pixels would be sufficient for deriving a height with an error smaller than 0.5 mm.
Accordingly, an accuracy of one pixel would lead to below 0.25 mm precision while an accuracy of 4 pixels would be sufficient for a precision smaller than 1 mm. While it may be conceivable to employ the full area of a compression element, it may be beneficial to arrange the marker elements only in that part of the compression element, which would not interfere with a projection of tissue within the X-ray image information. Accordingly, a compression element may comprise an object proximal region as well as an object distal region. In the context of the present invention, the object distal region may be considered that region that would not allow an overlapping of a projected marker and tissue within the X-ray image information.
Placing marker elements along an axis between chest wall and gantry or between the object proximal side and the object distal side, it is conceivable to derive position-specific heights thereby measuring paddle tilt or even deflection. Therefore, marker elements may be arranged in subgroups of at least three marker elements, which are arranged so as to constitute a single line or marker line. Since the distance between the marker elements within a single marker line is assumed to be known, a predefined model, e.g. a linear model or thin-plate-spline model or an interpolation through the measured heights as supporting points may be employed to determine the geometrical shape of the compression element and thus the deflection of the compression paddle.
The true height x+Δx on a marker line can be computed via Equation 1:
In case of a deflection of the compression element, true height can be computed likewise for several combinations of marker elements resulting in a plurality of supporting points with known true heights, that can be exploited in a thin-plate-spline or polynomial interpolation model.
Using a plurality of marker lines may even allow to determine a two-dimensional bending or warping of the compression element around the object to be determined, i.e. height x+Δx is a function of the two-dimensional position on the detector 6. Such a determination may in particular take into account that the deflection or warping of the compression element is required to be a continuous modification of the geometrical shape of the compression element. Exemplary examples for a deviation are provided in the following table, determined by the following equations.
For an exemplary mammography system with a distance between X-ray source and X-ray detector of h=650 mm, a detector area of 239Δ305 mm, d=250 mm, a true object thickness (x+Δx)=50 mm or measured height x=(50 mm−Δx) and a detector pixel size of p=0.085 mm, the deviation may be determined as follows. The exemplary marker element distance of d=250 mm exemplifies a case with substantially best accuracy when considering the exemplary dimensions of the detector area.
For these values, the observed marker position difference for a paddle height difference of Δx amounts to
with ΔD in [mm] or converted to
with ΔD in detector pixels [px].
Table 1 contains the observed marker distances in the image for a given height difference Δx and thus derives the necessary accuracy to achieve a certain precision of height measurement, e.g. 1.3 pixels marker localization accuracy for 0.25 mm precision in height measurement.
Exemplarily, a first compression element 8a is tilted relative to a second compression element 8b, e.g. an X-ray detector 6. The first compression element 8a comprises an object proximal region or side 20 and an object distal region or side 22. An arm element or a mounting element for the first compression element 8a, not depicted in
The first compression element 8a is forced downwards by force F, depicted at the left side of
Accordingly, the actual occurring compression thickness 30 equates to the measured thickness x 28 and the tilt Δxi. Accordingly, compression thickness 30=x+Δx1.
In
By determining the tilt Δx1 from the projection of the marker elements 24 on detector element 6 by knowing the distance D between the marker elements on compression element 8a and the projected distance D of the marker elements 24 on the X-ray detector 6, the compression thickness 30 may be determined by the measured thickness 28 and Δx1.
In the plane of the cross-sectional view of
Due to the deflection 16 of compression element 8a, the geometrical shape of the compression element is altered as well, an alteration of the distance of the marker elements relative to one another occurs. Since now the distance between the marker elements is not precisely known any more, using only two marker elements would result in an inaccurate determination of Δx2 and consequently the compression thickness 30. However, by employing at least three marker elements arranged in a single line, a so-called marker line 26, and employing the knowledge that the deformation of the compression element has to be a continuous deformation, said deformation or deflection 16 may be determined and thus Δx2 may be determined. In this regard, known methods of curvature approximation using known structure support points, i.e. marker elements, the shape of the deflected compression element may be determined with sufficient accuracy to allow determining Δx2.
The cross-sectional view of
Force F is applied to the object distal side 22, while object 10 is compressed between compression elements 8a,b on the object proximal side 20, thereby generating force F′ acting to deflect 16 compression element 8a by Δx. The distance between two adjacent marker elements 24 is indicated as d1 and d2, while the distance between the outer marker elements 24 is designated as d3. X-ray detector 6 obtains projections 24′ of marker elements 24 having the respective distances D1 to D3.
By knowing the pre-given distances d1 to d3, determining projected distances D1 to D3 in the image information and employing the assumption that the deformation of the compression element 8a is a continuous deflection 16 caused by a single resulting force F′, the shape and alignment of the compression element 8a along the marker line of the three marker elements depicted in
However, in case a non-symmetrical deformation is assumed, a plurality of marker elements or marker lines may be employed to determine the overall three-dimensional shape or deformation of a dedicated compression element. In particular, for each marker element 24, a specific Δxi may be determined, e.g. Δxa,b, which subsequently allows, by determining the shape of deformed compression element 8a, Δxc at the object proximal side 20 and thus compression height x+Δxc.
The sections between two marker elements may either be approximated as a straight line or the bent shape of the compression element may be taken into account by an iterative algorithm.
a-e depict different marker element configurations for determining a three-dimensional alteration of the shape of compression element 8a. The marker elements 24 in
In
The accuracy of determining a paddle deflection in the direction of a dedicated marker line may be further increased by employing more than three marker elements 24 within an individual marker line 26, e.g. four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten or more marker elements contained in a single marker line.
c and d each comprise nine individual marker elements 24, which however are arranged differently with regard to the inner three marker elements 24, thereby resulting in nine individual marker lines 26 in
The arrangement of marker elements according to
Now taking reference to
Method 40 comprises receiving 42 image information of an object being compressed between a first compression element and a second compression element while performing image acquisition, wherein the image information comprises image information of at least one marker element; and determining 44 a geometrical alteration of the at least one compression element by analyzing the marker element image information in the received image information. Further, from the geometrical alteration of at least one compression element, a thickness of the object compressed between the first compression element and the second compression element may be determined 46, in particular for an object density assessment.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2012/054486 | 8/31/2012 | WO | 00 | 2/28/2014 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61531677 | Sep 2011 | US |