The present document relates to various techniques for improving image capture for virtual reality displays.
Some current volumetric capture systems (or virtual reality (VR) capture systems), such as Lytro Immerge, sparsely sample a light-field volume using a relatively large number of cameras. The cameras can be arranged, for example, over a lattice that covers a flat surface, or a 3D surface such as a sphere. The cameras may thus define a “tiled camera array.” The cameras may be traditional 2D cameras, array cameras, or plenoptic light-field cameras, as described in above-referenced U.S. Provisional Application 62/148,460. Whichever system is used, it is often difficult to avoid some sparseness of the samples, leaving gaps in the coverage. Thus, in order to provide virtual reality functionality, the rendering system may advantageously interpolate between camera views.
When a viewer is watching and interacting with the captured virtual reality environment (or “volume”), it is beneficial for the playback system to allow the viewer to have as many degrees of freedom as feasible to explore the captured volume. For, example, six degrees of freedom may be provided, so as to allow the user full angular viewing freedom (yaw, pitch, roll) as well as spatial viewing freedom (translation side-to-side, up and down, and forward and backward). In general, it is desirable to provide for movement along the degrees of freedom seamlessly and smoothly.
In general, the ability of a VR capture system to deliver high quality playback at interpolated viewpoints is limited by the density of the capture viewpoints and the ability of the system to interpolate between capture viewpoints, which may in turn depend on the quality of the system's estimation of various properties of objects in the world. In order to provide accurate interpolations, it is useful to have information about properties of surfaces and objects. Estimated world properties may include, for example and without limitation, 3D geometry, reflectance, specularity of materials, transparency/translucency of objects, and/or the like. In many situations, however, it may be difficult or impossible to estimate these world properties with a sufficient degree of accuracy or precision to provide the desired results. Fine objects like hair may also be problematic.
Various techniques can be used to improve the quality of the systems with respect to artifacts caused by errors in such estimated properties. One option may be to increase the density of cameras in the capture system, and thus reduce the amount of interpolation that is required. However, increasing density can increase system requirements, costs, storage, processing, heat management, and/or the like. Furthermore, there is a physical limit to how closely cameras may be spaced in the tiled camera array.
Other techniques for improving quality include improving the accuracy of the world estimation process. While such an approach may be appealing, it can be difficult or impossible within the constraints of the system. Another option may be to include additional types of sensors designed for specific purposes. Examples include LiDAR sensors, Time-of-Flight (ToF) sensors, and structured light. Specialized sensors may help improve the accuracy of certain aspects of the world estimation process, but may still not improve the level of accuracy to the desired level.
Multiple techniques are described herein to improve the overall perceptual quality of the volumetric video playback experience. The systems and methods presented herein may be applied separately or in any suitable combination with one another.
In general, the systems and methods presented herein may provide mechanisms for minimizing errors in interpolation and world property estimation, so as to provide an improved virtual environment experience.
In at least one embodiment, a mix of camera types is used in the capture system, with varying resolution, density, and/or field-of-view. This capture system employing a mix of camera types may be considered a tiered camera array. In some cases the cameras of the tiered camera array may include multiple sets of cameras, for example, with a first plurality of cameras (a “first tier”) with a relatively lower density of cameras with relatively higher resolution, and a second plurality of cameras (a “second tier”) with a relatively higher density of cameras with a relatively lower resolution. If desired, more than two tiers may be used. The tiers may be arranged in interleaved patterns in which voids in denser tiers are filled with cameras from less dense tiers.
In at least one embodiment, when world properties are estimated, the estimated properties also include an error metric and/or confidence value of the estimated property. For example, such an error metric may be a measure of the photometric consistency of an estimated 3D patch in the world. If all the cameras that can see a particular portion of a scene provide subviews with consistent image data and/or world properties, there may be high confidence in the accuracy of the estimate of world properties for that portion of the scene. If the image data and/or world properties differ widely between the subviews, as may be the case for many visually complex objects and for estimation errors, then the confidence value may be low. A confidence map may be generated for each subview, representing the confidence level in each of multiple regions of the subview.
When a virtual view is to be rendered, the confidence map, the world properties, and/or the subview may be used. Each region of the subview and world properties for a subview may be used in rendering the virtual view to the extent of the confidence level for that region. In some embodiments, some of the cameras may be designated as primary cameras for which the subview and/or world properties are preferentially used. For regions in which the estimated world properties for a primary camera have low confidence, the subview and/or world properties for a secondary camera may be used instead. For a tiered camera array as described previously, the higher resolution cameras may be primary cameras, while lower resolution may be secondary tertiary, etc. Thus, the virtual view may be rendered with a balance between high resolution and high confidence in the associated world properties.
The accompanying drawings illustrate several embodiments. Together with the description, they serve to explain the principles of the embodiments. One skilled in the art will recognize that the particular embodiments illustrated in the drawings are merely exemplary, and are not intended to limit scope.
Multiple methods for capturing image and/or video data in a light-field volume and creating virtual views from such data are described. The described embodiments may provide for capturing continuous or nearly continuous light-field data from many or all directions facing away from the capture system, which may enable the generation of virtual views that are more accurate and/or allow viewers greater viewing freedom. In some embodiments, the viewer may move with six degrees of freedom while viewing the environment captured in the video data with virtual views rendered in real-time based on the position and orientation of the viewer's head.
Definitions
For purposes of the description provided herein, the following definitions are used:
In addition, for ease of nomenclature, the term “camera” is used herein to refer to an image capture device or other data acquisition device. Such a data acquisition device can be any device or system for acquiring, recording, measuring, estimating, determining and/or computing data representative of a scene, including but not limited to two-dimensional image data, three-dimensional image data, and/or light-field data. Such a data acquisition device may include optics, sensors, and image processing electronics for acquiring data representative of a scene, using techniques that are well known in the art. One skilled in the art will recognize that many types of data acquisition devices can be used in connection with the present disclosure, and that the disclosure is not limited to cameras. Thus, the use of the term “camera” herein is intended to be illustrative and exemplary, but should not be considered to limit the scope of the disclosure. Specifically, any use of such term herein should be considered to refer to any suitable device for acquiring image data.
In the following description, several techniques and methods for processing light-field images and/or video are described. One skilled in the art will recognize that these various techniques and methods can be performed on images and on video (generalized herein as “video data,” or in the light-field context, “light-field video data”). Further, the techniques and methods presented herein may be used in connection with a wide variety of camera types. Even though several examples utilize a tiered camera array, one of skill in the art will recognize how the described methods and techniques could be applied to a tiled camera array that is not a tiered camera array, or to a plenoptic light-field camera.
Problem Description
In order to create the highest image quality possible, particularly for VR or AR experiences with six degrees of freedom, it may be desirable to capture a fully sampled light-field volume. With a fully sampled light-field volume dataset, virtual views may be computed directly from the ray samples, and may not require additional information (for example, estimated world properties like 3D scene information). However, capturing a fully sampled light-field volume of sufficient size and resolution to generate a desirable virtual reality experience may be highly impractical or even impossible.
Due to practical considerations, existing solutions for capturing light-field volume video data are limited to capturing sparsely sampled light-field volumes. In general, existing systems employ a plurality of discrete cameras, each of which captures a subview. For example,
In order to use a sparsely sampled light-field volume to reconstruct arbitrary virtual views (for example, virtual views at locations and/or locations within the light-field volume that are determined by the location and/or orientation of the viewer's head), estimated world properties may be required. World properties may include aspects of the 3D environment captured in the light-field video, which may include but are not limited to the geometry and/or properties (such as reflectance, specularity, and/or translucency of the objects) of objects appearing in the video data.
Further, the required accuracy and/or complexity of the estimated world properties may be inversely related to the density of the cameras in the capture system. For example, reconstructing a virtual view based on a center of perspective that is one centimeter from a subview may be significantly easier and have significantly lower error than reconstructing the same virtual view from a subview that is ten centimeters away. In many cases, the projection error (measured in pixel displacement) may increase approximately linearly with the distance between the center of perspective of the virtual view and the center of perspective of the subview, given the same error in the estimated world properties.
As a result, it may be desirable to space cameras as closely as possible in the capture system, and thus reduce the amount of interpolation that is required. However, increasing density can increase system requirements, costs, storage, processing, heat management, and/or the like. Furthermore, there is a physical limit to how closely cameras may be spaced.
Overview
In a step 130, world properties may be estimated. The world properties may be estimated via analysis of the light-field video and/or other information, such as camera parameters and/or information about the scene from other sources. In some examples, other sensors such as LiDAR sensors may be used to provide geometry information regarding the environment captured in the video data. Such additional information may facilitate estimation of the world properties. In the alternative to or in addition to the foregoing, any techniques known in the art for estimating world properties for an environment captured in light-field or conventional video data may be used.
In a step 140, a confidence level in the estimated world properties ascertained in the step 130 may be calculated. The confidence level may represent the level of confidence that the estimated world properties are accurate. The confidence level may be expressed in many ways; according to one example, the confidence level may be numeric and may range from 0 to 1, with 0 representing low or no confidence, and 1 representing complete confidence.
In a step 150, a confidence map and/or an influence map may be generated for each of one or more of the subviews. A confidence map may be based on the world properties, as viewed from the subview, and may indicate a confidence level in the estimated world properties for objects visible in each region of the subview. A “region” may represent a ray bundle received in the photosensor of the camera system, and may have any size; in some embodiments, a region may be a single pixel; in other embodiments, each region may be 3×3 pixels square, 5×5 pixels square, or the like. In some embodiments, the confidence map may be a grayscale image, with light areas representing high confidence regions and darker areas representing low confidence regions.
In addition to or in the alternative to generation of a confidence map, an influence map may be generated in the step 150. The influence map may, for example, be a grayscale image indicative how much influence each region should have over the virtual view to be rendered. For example, lighter shades may be used for regions that are to have a high level of influence on the virtual view, while darker shades may be used for less influential regions. Like the confidence map, the influence map may be based, at least in part, on the confidence levels ascertained in the step 140.
In a step 160, one or more virtual views may be generated through the use of the subviews, the estimated world properties, and/or the confidence levels associated with each ray bundle. The estimated world properties may be used to enhance the quality of extrapolation between subviews as described above. The confidence levels may be used to further enhance the quality of virtual views generated by effectively determining which subview(s) should be used to render each region of the virtual view.
For regions of different subviews that have the same or similar confidence levels, the region with the higher resolution may preferentially be used to render the corresponding region of the virtual view. Regions with high confidence levels may be prioritized over regions with lower confidence levels for rendering the corresponding region of the virtual view.
In one embodiment, where the video data is captured with a tiered camera array, during creation of virtual views (for example, using an approach like depth image based rendering), ray data from the highest resolution cameras may preferentially be used, as long as the associated confidence and/or influence values are sufficiently high. In regions of the virtual view where insufficient information from the high resolution cameras may be available (for example, due to low confidence in the estimated world properties and/or occlusions in the originally captured data), ray bundle data from the lower resolution camera(s) may be used.
Once all desired virtual views have been rendered, the method 100 may end 190. This may represent the end of the VR or AR experience.
A depth map may be a grayscale image depicting the estimated depth of objects in the captured environment, from the camera that captured the corresponding subview. As in estimation of the world properties, depth maps may be generated via analysis of the video data and/or use of other data, such as known locations of objects within the environment and/or sensor data from other sensors such as LiDAR sensors.
Pursuant to the step 220, depth maps may be directly calculated for each of one or more subviews. Then, in the step 150, a confidence and/or influence map may be generated for each subview. As in the method 100, the confidence and/or influence map generated in the step 150 may be indicative of the confidence level in world properties such as the depth information contained in the depth maps estimated in the step 220. In the step 160, the virtual views may be generated using the captured image and/or video data, the estimated world properties, and the confidence/influence data associated with each captured ray bundle, as in the method 100. The method 200 may then end 190.
Tiled Camera Arrays
In some embodiments, the step 120 may be carried out with a tiled camera array. A tiled camera array is one type of light-field camera, which operates based on the use of multiple objective lenses, rather than a single objective lens with a microlens array, as in a plenoptic light-field camera.
Tiered Camera Array
In some embodiments, the capture system used to carry out the step 120 is a tiled camera array that includes two or more tiers of camera types, and may thus be a tiered camera array. The cameras of each type may capture images and/or video at different resolutions. In some embodiments, the tiers may include a sparse set of cameras with high quality and resolution, and a more densely packed set of cameras with significantly lower resolution. Comparative examples will be shown and described below.
Specifically, the tiered camera array 700 may include five high resolution (Tier 1) cameras 610, each of which has a resolution of 4000×4000 pixels, and thirty-four lower resolution (Tier 2) cameras 710, each of which has a resolution of 1000×1000 pixels. The cameras 610 and the cameras 710 may cooperate to cover a capture surface 720 with an area of A m2 (for example, the same area as covered in 600). Each of the cameras 610 and the cameras 710 may have a field-of-view equal to F degrees (for example, 90 degrees). The total resolution is 114 MP, and camera density is quadrupled relative to the configuration of
Specifically, the tiered camera array 800 may have five high-resolution cameras 610 (Tier 1), each of which has a resolution of 4000×4000 pixels, ten lower resolution cameras 710 (Tier 2), each of which has a resolution of 1000×1000 pixels, and 118 very low resolution cameras 810 (Tier 3), each of which has a resolution of 500×500 pixels. The cameras 610, the cameras 710, and the cameras 810 may cooperate to cover a capture surface 820 with an area of A meters sq. Each of the cameras 610, the cameras 710, and the cameras 810 may have a field-of-view equal to F degrees. The total resolution is 119.5 MP, and camera density is raised by a factor of 16 relative to the configuration of
In the exemplary tiered camera arrays 700 and 800 shown in
Notably, the term “resolution” in cameras may often be used to describe the pixel count of the captured images. When comparing cameras with similar or identical fields-of-view, the pixel count may be adequate information to determine which camera may better resolve a specific object. However, in the case that the fields-of-view of the cameras are not comparable, pixel count may not be the most important factor. In this disclosure, resolution may be considered to correspond with the angular field-of-view covered by single pixel in a camera. For example, a camera that contains a field-of-view of 50° and a 100×100 pixel array may be considered to have approximately double the resolution of a camera that contains a field-of-view of 100° and the same 100×100 pixel array.
Notably, all the examples of tiered camera arrays described above contain cameras arranged in a regular pattern (for example, a hexagonal lattice). However, such an arrangement is merely illustrative, and any camera layout, including irregular patterns, may be used.
In various embodiments, other configurations can be used. By providing tiers of cameras of different resolutions, high camera densities can be achieved while potentially decreasing overall pixel counts.
Resource usage can scale differently depending on pixel count. Storage and bandwidth may generally scale linearly with pixel counts. Data processing requirements may scale according to a more complicated relationship; however, in general, more pixels increases processing time and complexity. In addition, costs for higher resolution cameras may be dramatically higher than costs for low resolution cameras. Accordingly, the techniques described herein can significantly decrease capital and/or operating costs involved in manufacturing and/or using the capture system.
Estimation of World Properties
Pursuant to the step 130 and/or the step 220, various aspects of the world may be estimated, some better than others. In at least one embodiment, the system estimates any or all of the following world properties, in any suitable combination:
In some embodiments, in the step 130 and/or the step 220, depth maps are estimated for all subviews. See, for example, the Middlebury Multi-View Stereo benchmark (http://vision.middlebury.edu/mview/), a dataset and benchmark that evaluates a variety of methods and contains numerous publications and sets of sample code.
Evaluation of Confidence in World Estimates
In at least one embodiment, the system creates a world model and then, pursuant to the step 140, based on the world model, makes a determination as to a quality metric and/or confidence value of interpolations based on that world model. The quality metric and/or confidence value may later be used to decide which ray bundle data to use in rendering virtual views.
In at least one embodiment, when world properties are estimated, the estimated properties also include an error metric and/or confidence value corresponding to the estimated property. For example, such an error metric may be a measure of the photometric consistency of an estimated 3D patch in the world. If all the subviews in which the patch appears have a high degree of agreement regarding the characteristics of the patch, relative to other possibilities, there may be high confidence in the accuracy of the estimate. If the characteristics of the patch differ significantly between the subviews, as may occur with many visually complex objects and instances in which the world estimate is incorrect, then the confidence value may be low.
In at least one embodiment, the confidence value of a patch may be calculated by comparing the photometric consistency cost with the estimated properties (for example, the 3D location and orientation of the patch) against other possible positions and/or orientations. In one embodiment, the set of possible positions for a patch of pixels may be generated by sampling along the ray bundles corresponding to the pixels in the patch from the perspective of a reference camera. Each pixel in the patch contains light from a specific direction relative to the camera, which may be specified by a geometric ray equation. The patch locations may be generated by sampling at different distances along the ray from the reference camera origin. In one embodiment, a confidence score is computed that is a relative comparison of the photometric consistency cost at the estimated location relative to the lowest local cost minima of the other considered locations, as follows:
confidence=(other_minima-photo_cost)/other_minima
In the case where the current cost is the lowest for the patch of the considered possibilities, the patch location may be considered to be the estimated 3D position. Confidence scores may have a value between 0 and 1, where 1 may represent high confidence. Other value scales for confidence may be used.
In contrast,
Notably, for clarity,
In at least one embodiment, one measure of quality and/or confidence is photometric consistency, as described in Furukawa et al., “Accurate, Dense and Robust Multi-View Stereopsis,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (Volume: 32, Issue: 8, August 2010). Patches having higher photometric consistency can be considered to have higher quality and/or confidence value.
In at least one embodiment, once a model has been generated, the system evaluates the quality of the model. Quality/confidence evaluation may additionally or alternatively be performed during model estimation.
In at least one embodiment, the following algorithm can be used for evaluating quality and/or confidence in a model, by projecting the color data from one subview onto another using the estimated world properties and then comparing the color values in projected virtual view to the capture subview:
Examples are shown in
Notably, the examples provided above use only two cameras for clarity. In practice, every camera may be compared against a plurality of other cameras. The final confidence and/or quality scores may be computed as any function of all the inputs (for example, the minimum, mean, or median values may be used).
Virtual View Generation
Pursuant to the step 160, virtual views may be generated (i.e., “reconstructed”) in various ways. In at least one embodiment, virtual camera images may be generated using depth image based rendering (DIBR). In this approach, virtual views may be reconstructed at any virtual camera position and/or orientation within the light-field volume. Color image data from the subviews may be warped and/or projected into the virtual camera view using the estimated world properties (for example, including depth), and the capture system calibration data.
In at least one embodiment, where a tiered camera array is used, generation of the virtual view may proceed with reference to the confidence value for each ray bundle. For example, for each ray bundle in the high quality camera set (i.e., a pixel value from a single capture camera), if the confidence value is high (i.e., estimated world properties associated with that ray are of high quality and/or confidence), then the system may use the ray bundle with a high influence value. Conversely, if the confidence value is low, either the ray is not used, or it is assigned a low influence value. For example, ray influence may be assigned in the following manner to the high quality camera set:
In one embodiment, High_C may be equal to 0.5 and Low_C may be equal to 0.3. Of course, this assignment of influence is exemplary, and many other assignment functions may be used.
In at least one embodiment, depth image based rendering may be performed using the data corresponding to the Tier 1 cameras. The reconstruction may be performed according to any existing methods, and may further include the influence channel in the reconstructed image. In one embodiment, the output may be a four-channel image with red, green, blue, and influence. Further, depth image based rendering may be separately performed on the other tiers of cameras.
The reconstructed images may then be combined by treating the influence channel as a typical alpha channel, and successively performing the SRC_OVER operation, where the lowest tier camera data may be considered the source. After combination, if any pixels remain with influence values below 1, the system may fill those pixels with data from the highest tier reconstructed image (lowest resolution), using any existing hallucination or fill algorithm, or any other approach.
For example, as mentioned previously,
In at least one embodiment, during reconstruction, the system uses rays requiring the least interpolation (which will generally be from lower quality but more densely packed cameras) to fill in areas of the virtual view with low confidence/high error in the estimated world properties. In at least one embodiment, a tiered approach may be used, in which more than two types of camera are used. Using such an approach, high confidence is associated with highest resolution, midconfidence is associated with mid-level resolution, and low or no confidence is associated with low resolution. Additional tiers may also be provided, if appropriate.
In at least one embodiment, the system blends regions of low confidence with those of high confidence, so as not to introduce undesirable artifacts. For example, small amounts of local filtering and/or blending can be used in the final rendering of images. As a specific example, a five-pixel blending zone may be used to smooth the change from one resolution level to another.
Using the above-described techniques, most areas of the scene may be fully reconstructed from the high resolution data with excellent results. Difficult areas, like specular reflections, transparent objects, and textureless surfaces, may be reconstructed generally using the lower resolution data. While the captured resolution is lower, the overall quality in those regions may be significantly higher because minimal (incorrect) interpolation is performed.
The above description and referenced drawings set forth particular details with respect to possible embodiments. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the techniques described herein may be practiced in other embodiments. First, the particular naming of the components, capitalization of terms, the attributes, data structures, or any other programming or structural aspect is not mandatory or significant, and the mechanisms that implement the techniques described herein may have different names, formats, or protocols. Further, the system may be implemented via a combination of hardware and software, as described, or entirely in hardware elements, or entirely in software elements. Also, the particular division of functionality between the various system components described herein is merely exemplary, and not mandatory; functions performed by a single system component may instead be performed by multiple components, and functions performed by multiple components may instead be performed by a single component.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or to “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Some embodiments may include a system or a method for performing the above-described techniques, either singly or in any combination. Other embodiments may include a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium and computer program code, encoded on the medium, for causing a processor in a computing device or other electronic device to perform the above-described techniques.
Some portions of the above are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a memory of a computing device. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps (instructions) leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic or optical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated. It is convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like. Furthermore, it is also convenient at times, to refer to certain arrangements of steps requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities as modules or code devices, without loss of generality.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “displaying” or “determining” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing module and/or device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
Certain aspects include process steps and instructions described herein in the form of an algorithm. It should be noted that the process steps and instructions of described herein can be embodied in software, firmware and/or hardware, and when embodied in software, can be downloaded to reside on and be operated from different platforms used by a variety of operating systems.
Some embodiments relate to an apparatus for performing the operations described herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computing device selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computing device. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, flash memory, solid state drives, magnetic or optical cards, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus. Further, the computing devices referred to herein may include a single processor or may be architectures employing multiple processor designs for increased computing capability.
The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computing device, virtualized system, or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may also be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will be apparent from the description provided herein. In addition, the techniques set forth herein are not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the techniques described herein, and any references above to specific languages are provided for illustrative purposes only.
Accordingly, in various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented as software, hardware, and/or other elements for controlling a computer system, computing device, or other electronic device, or any combination or plurality thereof. Such an electronic device can include, for example, a processor, an input device (such as a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, trackpad, joystick, trackball, microphone, and/or any combination thereof), an output device (such as a screen, speaker, and/or the like), memory, long-term storage (such as magnetic storage, optical storage, and/or the like), and/or network connectivity, according to techniques that are well known in the art. Such an electronic device may be portable or nonportable. Examples of electronic devices that may be used for implementing the techniques described herein include: a mobile phone, personal digital assistant, smartphone, kiosk, server computer, enterprise computing device, desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet computer, consumer electronic device, television, set-top box, or the like. An electronic device for implementing the techniques described herein may use any operating system such as, for example: Linux; Microsoft Windows, available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.; Mac OS X, available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; iOS, available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; Android, available from Google, Inc. of Mountain View, Calif.; and/or any other operating system that is adapted for use on the device.
In various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented in a distributed processing environment, networked computing environment, or web-based computing environment. Elements can be implemented on client computing devices, servers, routers, and/or other network or non-network components. In some embodiments, the techniques described herein are implemented using a client/server architecture, wherein some components are implemented on one or more client computing devices and other components are implemented on one or more servers. In one embodiment, in the course of implementing the techniques of the present disclosure, client(s) request content from server(s), and server(s) return content in response to the requests. A browser may be installed at the client computing device for enabling such requests and responses, and for providing a user interface by which the user can initiate and control such interactions and view the presented content.
Any or all of the network components for implementing the described technology may, in some embodiments, be communicatively coupled with one another using any suitable electronic network, whether wired or wireless or any combination thereof, and using any suitable protocols for enabling such communication. One example of such a network is the Internet, although the techniques described herein can be implemented using other networks as well.
While a limited number of embodiments has been described herein, those skilled in the art, having benefit of the above description, will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised which do not depart from the scope of the claims. In addition, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the disclosure is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/333,637 for “Image Capture for Virtual Reality Displays”, filed May 9, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application also claims priority as a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/084,326 for “Capturing Light-Field Volume Images and Video Data Using Tiled Light-Field Cameras”, filed Mar. 29, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporate herein by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/084,326 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/148,055 for “Light Guided Image Plane Tiled Arrays with Dense Fiber Optic Bundles for Light-Field and High Resolution Image Acquisition”, filed Apr. 15, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/084,326 also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/148,460 for “Capturing Light-Field Volume Image and Video Data Using Tiled Light-Field Cameras”, filed Apr. 16, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety The present application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/302,826 for “Depth Determination for Light-Field Images”, filed Jun. 12, 2014 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,988,317 on Mar. 24, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
725567 | Ives | Apr 1903 | A |
4383170 | Takagi et al. | May 1983 | A |
4661986 | Adelson | Apr 1987 | A |
4694185 | Weiss | Sep 1987 | A |
4920419 | Easterly | Apr 1990 | A |
5076687 | Adelson | Dec 1991 | A |
5077810 | D'Luna | Dec 1991 | A |
5251019 | Moorman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5282045 | Mimura et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5499069 | Griffith | Mar 1996 | A |
5572034 | Karellas | Nov 1996 | A |
5610390 | Miyano | Mar 1997 | A |
5729471 | Jain et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748371 | Cathey, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757423 | Tanaka et al. | May 1998 | A |
5818525 | Elabd | Oct 1998 | A |
5835267 | Mason et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5907619 | Davis | May 1999 | A |
5949433 | Klotz | Sep 1999 | A |
5974215 | Bilbro et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6005936 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021241 | Bilbro et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023523 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028606 | Kolb et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034690 | Gallery et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061083 | Aritake et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061400 | Pearlstein et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069565 | Stern et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075889 | Hamilton, Jr. et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084979 | Kanade et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091860 | Dimitri | Jul 2000 | A |
6097394 | Levoy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115556 | Reddington | Sep 2000 | A |
6137100 | Fossum et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6169285 | Pertrillo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201899 | Bergen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221687 | Abramovich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6320979 | Melen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6424351 | Bishop et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6448544 | Stanton et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466207 | Gortler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476805 | Shum et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479827 | Hamamoto et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483535 | Tamburrino et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6529265 | Henningsen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6577342 | Webster | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587147 | Li | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597859 | Leinhardt et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606099 | Yamada | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6658168 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674430 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680976 | Chen et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687419 | Atkin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697062 | Cabral | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6768980 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785667 | Orbanes et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6833865 | Fuller et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842297 | Dowski, Jr. et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6900841 | Mihara | May 2005 | B1 |
6924841 | Jones | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927922 | George et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7015954 | Foote et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7025515 | Woods | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034866 | Colmenarez et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7079698 | Kobayashi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7102666 | Kanade et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7164807 | Morton | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7206022 | Miller et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7239345 | Rogina | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7286295 | Sweatt et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7304670 | Hussey et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7329856 | Ma et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336430 | George | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7417670 | Linzer et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7469381 | Ording | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477304 | Hu | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7587109 | Reininger | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7620309 | Georgiev | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623726 | Georgiev | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7633513 | Kondo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7683951 | Aotsuka | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687757 | Tseng et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7723662 | Levoy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7724952 | Shum et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7748022 | Frazier | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7847825 | Aoki et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7936377 | Friedhoff et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7936392 | Ng et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7941634 | Georgi | May 2011 | B2 |
7945653 | Zuckerberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949252 | Georgiev | May 2011 | B1 |
7982776 | Dunki-Jacobs et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8013904 | Tan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8085391 | Machida et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8106856 | Matas et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8115814 | Iwase et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8155456 | Babacan | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8155478 | Vitsnudel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8189089 | Georgiev et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8228417 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8248515 | Ng et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8259198 | Cote et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264546 | Witt | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8279325 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289440 | Knight et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290358 | Georgiev | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8310554 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315476 | Georgiev et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8345144 | Georgiev et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8400533 | Szedo | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8400555 | Georgiev et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8427548 | Lim et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8442397 | Kang et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8446516 | Pitts et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8494304 | Venable et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8531581 | Shroff | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542933 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8559705 | Ng | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570426 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577216 | Li et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8581998 | Ohno | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8589374 | Chaudhri | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593564 | Border et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8605199 | Imai | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8614764 | Pitts et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8619082 | Ciurea | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8629930 | Brueckner et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8665440 | Kompaniets et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8675073 | Aagaard et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8724014 | Ng et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8736710 | Spielberg | May 2014 | B2 |
8736751 | Yun | May 2014 | B2 |
8749620 | Pitts et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8750509 | Renkis | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8754829 | Lapstun | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8760566 | Pitts et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768102 | Ng et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8797321 | Bertolami et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8811769 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8831377 | Pitts et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8848970 | Aller et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8860856 | Wetsztein et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8879901 | Caldwell et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903232 | Caldwell | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8908058 | Akeley et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8948545 | Akeley et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8953882 | Lim et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971625 | Pitts et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976288 | Ng et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988317 | Liang | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8995785 | Knight et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8997021 | Liang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9001226 | Ng et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9013611 | Szedo | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9106914 | Doser | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9184199 | Pitts et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9201142 | Antao | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9201193 | Smith | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9210391 | Mills | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9214013 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9262067 | Bell et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9294662 | Vondran, Jr. et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9300932 | Knight et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9305375 | Akeley | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9305956 | Pittes et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9386288 | Akeley et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9392153 | Myhre et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9419049 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9467607 | Ng et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9497380 | Jannard et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9607424 | Ng et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9628684 | Liang et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9635332 | Carroll et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9639945 | Oberheu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9647150 | Blasco Claret | May 2017 | B2 |
9681069 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9774800 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9858649 | Liang et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9866810 | Knight et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9900510 | Karafin et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9979909 | Kuang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10244266 | Wu | Mar 2019 | B1 |
20010048968 | Cox et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053202 | Mazess et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001395 | Davis et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015048 | Mister | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020061131 | Sawhney | May 2002 | A1 |
20020109783 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020159030 | Frey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020199106 | Hayashi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030043270 | Rafey | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030081145 | Seaman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103670 | Schoelkopf et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117511 | Belz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123700 | Wakao | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133018 | Ziemkowski | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147252 | Fioravanti | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156077 | Balogh | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172131 | Ao | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040002179 | Barton et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012688 | Tinnerino | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012689 | Tinnerino | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040101166 | Williams et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114176 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135780 | Mims | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040189686 | Tanguay et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040212725 | Raskar | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040257360 | Sieckmann | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050031203 | Fukuda | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049500 | Babu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052543 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080602 | Snyder et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050141881 | Taira et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162540 | Yata | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050212918 | Serra et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050253728 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050276441 | Debevec | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060023066 | Li et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050170 | Tanaka | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056040 | Lan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056604 | Sylthe et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072175 | Oshino | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078052 | Dang | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082879 | Miyoshi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060130017 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060208259 | Jeon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060248348 | Wakao et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060250322 | Hall et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256226 | Alon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274210 | Kim | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285741 | Subbarao | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008317 | Lundstrom | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019883 | Wong et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030357 | Levien et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033588 | Landsman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052810 | Monroe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071316 | Kubo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070081081 | Cheng | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097206 | Houvener | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103558 | Cai et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113198 | Robertson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140676 | Nakahara | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070188613 | Norbori et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201853 | Petschnigg | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070229653 | Matusik et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070230944 | Georgiev | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070269108 | Steinberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273795 | Jaynes | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080007626 | Wernersson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012988 | Baharav et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018668 | Yamauchi | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031537 | Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049113 | Hirai | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056569 | Williams et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080122940 | Mori | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129728 | Satoshi | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144952 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152215 | Horie et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168404 | Ording | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180792 | Georgiev | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187305 | Raskar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193026 | Horie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205871 | Utagawa | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080226274 | Spielberg | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232680 | Berestov et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253652 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260291 | Alakarhu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266688 | Errando Smet et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277566 | Utagawa | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080309813 | Watanabe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316301 | Givon | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027542 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090041381 | Georgiev et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090041448 | Georgiev et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070710 | Kagaya | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090102956 | Georgiev | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109280 | Gotsman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090128658 | Hayasaka et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128669 | Ng et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135258 | Nozaki | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140131 | Utagawa | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167909 | Imagawa et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185051 | Sano | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185801 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190022 | Ichimura | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190024 | Hayasaka et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195689 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090202235 | Li et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204813 | Kwan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207233 | Mauchly et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090273843 | Raskar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290848 | Brown | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295829 | Georgiev et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309973 | Kogane | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309975 | Gordon | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310885 | Tamaru | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321861 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100003024 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011117 | Hristodorescu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100021001 | Honsinger et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026852 | Ng et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050120 | Ohazama et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060727 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100097444 | Lablans | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103311 | Makii | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107068 | Butcher et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111489 | Presler | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123784 | Ding et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141780 | Tan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100141802 | Knight | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142839 | Lakus-Becker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100201789 | Yahagi | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100253782 | Elazary | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265385 | Knight et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277629 | Tanaka | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303288 | Malone | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328485 | Imamura et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110018903 | Lapstun et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019056 | Hirsch et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110025827 | Shpunt et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032338 | Raveendran et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050864 | Bond | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110050909 | Ellenby | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063414 | Chen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069175 | Mistretta et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075729 | Dane et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090255 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110123183 | Adelsberger et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129120 | Chan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110129165 | Lim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148764 | Gao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149074 | Lee et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169994 | DiFrancesco et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110194617 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110205384 | Zamowski et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110221947 | Awazu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242334 | Wilburn et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242352 | Hikosaka | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261164 | Olesen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261205 | Sun | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267263 | Hinckley | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273466 | Imai et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279479 | Rodriguez | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110133649 | Bales et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110292258 | Adler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298960 | Tan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304745 | Wang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311046 | Oka | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316968 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014837 | Fehr et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120044330 | Watanabe | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120050562 | Perwass et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056889 | Carter et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056982 | Katz | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057040 | Park et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057806 | Backlund et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062755 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120120240 | Muramatsu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132803 | Hirato et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133746 | Bigioi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147205 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120176481 | Lukk et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183055 | Hong et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188344 | Imai | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201475 | Carmel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120206574 | Shikata et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218463 | Benezra et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224787 | Imai | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120229691 | Hiasa et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249529 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249550 | Akeley | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249819 | Imai | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120251131 | Henderson et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257065 | Velarde et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257795 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268367 | Vertegaal et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269274 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272271 | Nishizawa et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287246 | Katayama | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287296 | Fukui | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287329 | Yahata | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293075 | Engelen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300091 | Shroff et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120237222 | Ng et al. | Dec 2012 | A9 |
20120321172 | Jachalsky | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130002902 | Ito | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130002936 | Hirama et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021486 | Richardson | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038696 | Ding et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041215 | McDowall | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130044290 | Kawamura | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050546 | Kano | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130064453 | Nagasaka et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130064532 | Caldwell et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070059 | Kushida | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070060 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077880 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082905 | Ranieri et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088616 | Ingrassia, Jr. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093844 | Shuto | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093859 | Nakamura | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094101 | Oguchi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107085 | Ng et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113981 | Knight et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120356 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120605 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120636 | Baer | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127901 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128052 | Catrein et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128081 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128087 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130135448 | Nagumo et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130176481 | Holmes et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130188068 | Said | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130215108 | McMahon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215226 | Chauvier et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222656 | Kaneko | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234935 | Griffith | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242137 | Kirkland | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130243391 | Park et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258451 | Ei-Ghoroury et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262511 | Kuffner et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130286236 | Mankowski | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130321574 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130321581 | Ei-Ghoroury | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130321677 | Cote et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329107 | Burley et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329132 | Tico et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335596 | Demandoix et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342700 | Kass | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002502 | Han | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140002699 | Guan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003719 | Bai et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013273 | Ng | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035959 | Lapstun | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140037280 | Shirakawa | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049663 | Ng et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059462 | Wernersson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140085282 | Luebke et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092424 | Grosz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098191 | Rime et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140132741 | Aagaard et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140133749 | Kuo et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139538 | Barber et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140167196 | Heimgartner et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176540 | Tosio et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176592 | Wilburn et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176710 | Brady et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177905 | Grefalda | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184885 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192208 | Okincha | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140193047 | Grosz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195921 | Grosz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204111 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140211077 | Ng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218540 | Geiss et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140226038 | Kimura | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240463 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240578 | Fishman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245367 | Sasaki | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140267243 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267639 | Tatsuta | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140300753 | Yin | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313350 | Keelan | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313375 | Milnar | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140333787 | Venkataraman | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140340390 | Lanman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347540 | Kang | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140354863 | Ahn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368494 | Sakharnykh et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368640 | Strandemar et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150029386 | Pitts et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150042767 | Ciurea | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049915 | Ciurea | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150062178 | Matas et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150062386 | Sugawara | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150092071 | Meng et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150097985 | Akeley | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150161798 | Venkataraman | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150193937 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150206340 | Munkberg et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150207990 | Ford et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150223731 | Sahin | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150237273 | Sawadaishi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150264337 | Venkataraman | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150104101 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304667 | Suehring et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310592 | Kano | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312553 | Ng et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312593 | Akeley et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150334420 | De Vieeschauwer et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150346832 | Cole et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370011 | Ishihara | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370012 | Ishihara | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373279 | Osborne | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160029002 | Balko | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160029017 | Liang | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160037178 | Lee et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160065931 | Konieczny | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160065947 | Cole et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160142615 | Liang | May 2016 | A1 |
20160155215 | Suzuki | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160165206 | Huang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173844 | Knight et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182893 | Wan | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191823 | El-Ghoroury | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160227244 | Rosewarne | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160247324 | Mullins et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160253837 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269620 | Romanenko et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160307368 | Akeley | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160307372 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160309065 | Karafin et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160337635 | Nisenzon | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160353026 | Blonde et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381348 | Hayasaka et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170059305 | Nonn et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170067832 | Ferrara, Jr. et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170094906 | Liang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170134639 | Pitts et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170139131 | Karafin et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170221226 | Shen | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170237971 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170243373 | Bevensee et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244948 | Pang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170256036 | Song et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170263012 | Sabater et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170302903 | Ng et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170316602 | Smirnov | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170358092 | Bleibel et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170365068 | Tan et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170374411 | Lederer et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180012397 | Carothers | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180020204 | Pang et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180024753 | Gewickey et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180033209 | Akeley et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180034134 | Pang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180070066 | Knight et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180070067 | Knight et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082405 | Liang | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180089903 | Pang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180097867 | Pang et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180124371 | Kamal | May 2018 | A1 |
20180139436 | Yucer | May 2018 | A1 |
20180158198 | Kamad | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180199039 | Trepte | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101226292 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101309359 | Nov 2008 | CN |
19624421 | Jan 1997 | DE |
2010020100 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2011135170 | Jul 2011 | JP |
10-2011-0074984 | Jul 2011 | KR |
2003052465 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2006039486 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2007092545 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007092581 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2011010234 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029209 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011081187 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nimeroff, J., et al., “Efficient rendering of naturally illuminatied environments” in Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 359-373, 1994. |
Nokia, “City Lens”, May 2012. |
Ogden, J., “Pyramid-Based Computer Graphics”, 1985. |
Okano et al., “Three-dimensional video system based on integral photography” Optical Engineering, Jun. 1999. vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1072-1077. |
Orzan, Alexandrina, et al., “Diffusion Curves: A Vector Representation for Smooth-Shaded Images,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2008; vol. 27; 2008. |
Pain, B., “Back-Side Illumination Technology for SOI-CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009. |
Perez, Patrick et al., “Poisson Image Editing,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003; vol. 22, Issue 3; Jul. 2003; pp. 313-318. |
Petschnigg, George, et al., “Digial Photography with Flash and No-Flash Image Pairs”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
Primesense, “The Primesense 3D Awareness Sensor”, 2007. |
Ramamoorthi, R., et al, “Frequency space environment map rendering” ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2002 proceedings) 21, 3, 517-526. |
Ramamoorthi, R., et al., “An efficient representation for irradiance environment maps”, in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 497-500. |
Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Glare Aware Photography: 4D Ray Sampling for Reducing Glare Effects of Camera Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, Aug. 2008; vol. 27, Issue 3; pp. 1-10. |
Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Non-photorealistic Camera: Depth Edge Detection and Stylized Rendering using Multi-Flash Imaging”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
Raytrix, “Raytrix Lightfield Camera,” Raytrix GmbH, Germany 2012, pp. 1-35. |
Scharstein, Daniel, et al., “High-Accuracy Stereo Depth Maps Using Structured Light,” CVPR'03 Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Computer Society, pp. 195-202. |
Schirmacher, H. et al., “High-Quality Interactive Lumigraph Rendering Through Warping,” May 2000, Graphics Interface 2000. |
Shade, Jonathan, et al., “Layered Depth Images”, SIGGRAPH 98, pp. 1-2. |
Shreiner, OpenGL Programming Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 8, 2010. |
Simpleviewer, “Tiltview”, http://simpleviewer.net/tiltviewer. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Skodras, A. et al., “The JPEG 2000 Still Image Compression Standard,” Sep. 2001, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 36-58. |
Sloan, P., et al., “Precomputed radiance transfer for real-time rendering in dynamic, low-frequency lighting environments”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 527-536, 2002. |
Snavely, Noah, et al., “Photo-tourism: Exploring Photo collections in 3D”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Proceedings), 2006. |
Sokolov, “Autostereoscopy and Integral Photography by Professor Lippmann's Method” , 1911, pp. 23-29. |
Sony Corp, “Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera Handbook”, 2011. |
Stensvold, M., “Hybrid AF: A New Approach to Autofocus is Emerging for both Still and Video”, Digital Photo Magazine, Nov. 13, 2012. |
Story, D., “The Future of Photography”, Optics Electronics, Oct. 2008. |
Sun, Jian, et al., “Stereo Matching Using Belief Propagation”, 2002. |
Tagging photos on Flickr, Facebook and other online photo sharing sites (see, for example, http://support.gnip.com/customer/portal/articles/809309-flickr-geo-photos-tag-search). Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Takahashi, Keita, et al., “All in-focus View Synthesis from Under-Sampled Light Fields”, ICAT 2003, Tokyo, Japan. |
Tanida et al., “Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification” Applied Optics 40, 11 (Apr. 10, 2001), pp. 1806-1813. |
Tao, Michael, et al., “Depth from Combining Defocus and Correspondence Using Light-Field Cameras”, Dec. 2013. |
Techcrunch, “Coolinis”, Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Teo, P., et al., “Efficient linear rendering for interactive light design”, Tech. Rep. STAN-CS-TN-97-60, 1998, Stanford University. |
Teranishi, N. “Evolution of Optical Structure in Images Sensors,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2012 IEEE International; Dec. 10-13, 2012. |
Vaish et al., “Using plane + parallax for calibrating dense camera arrays”, In Proceedings CVPR 2004, pp. 2-9. |
Vaish, V., et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform,” Workshop on Advanced 3D Imaging for Safety and Security (in conjunction with CVPR 2005), 2005. |
VR Playhouse, “The Surrogate,” http://www.vrplayhouse.com/the-surrogate. |
Wanner, S. et al., “Globally Consistent Depth Labeling of 4D Light Fields,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012. |
Wanner, S. et al., “Variational Light Field Analysis for Disparity Estimation and Super-Resolution,” IEEE Transacations on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intellegence, 2013. |
Wenger, et al, “Performance Relighting and Reflectance Transformation with Time-Multiplexed Illumination”, Institute for Creative Technologies, SIGGRAPH 2005. |
Wetzstein, Gordon, et al., “Sensor Saturation in Fourier Multiplexed Imaging”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2010). |
Wikipedia—Adaptive Optics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/adaptive_optics. Retrieved Feb. 2014. |
Wikipedia—Autofocus systems and methods: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofocus. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Bayer Filter: http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013. |
Wikipedia—Color Image Pipeline: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/color_image_pipeline. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014. |
Wikipedia—Compression standard JPEG XR: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XR. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—CYGM Filter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CYGM_filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013. |
Wikipedia—Data overlay techniques for real-time visual feed. For example, heads-up displays: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-up_display. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Exchangeable image file format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Expeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EXPEED. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014. |
Wikipedia—Extensible Metadata Platform: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Metadata_Plafform. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Key framing for video animation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_frame. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Lazy loading of image data: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy_loading. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Methods of Variable Bitrate Encoding: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_bitrate#Methods_of VBR_encoding. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Portable Network Graphics format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Unsharp Mask Technique: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsharp_masking. Retrieved May 3, 2016. |
Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 24, Issue 3 (Jul. 2005), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, pp. 765-776. |
Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “High Speed Video Using a Dense Camera Array”, 2004. |
Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002. |
Williams, L. “Pyramidal Parametrics,” Computer Graphic (1983). |
Winnemoller, H., et al., “Light Waving: Estimating Light Positions From Photographs Alone”, Eurographics 2005. |
Wippermann, F. “Chirped Refractive Microlens Array,” Dissertation 2007. |
Wuu, S., et al., “A Manufacturable Back-Side Illumination Technology Using Bulk Si Substrate for Advanced CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway. |
Wuu, S., et al., “BSI Technology with Bulk Si Wafer”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway. |
Xiao, Z. et al., “Aliasing Detection and Reduction in Plenoptic Imaging,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2014. |
Xu, Xin et al., “Robust Automatic Focus Algorithm for Low Contrast Images Using a New Contrast Measure,” Sensors 2011; 14 pages. |
Zheng, C. et al., “Parallax Photography: Creating 3D Cinematic Effects from Stills”, Proceedings of Graphic Interface, 2009. |
Zitnick, L. et al., “High-Quality Video View Interpolation Using a Layered Representation,” Aug. 2004; ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004; vol. 23, Issue 3; pp. 600-608. |
Zoberbier, M., et al., “Wafer Cameras—Novel Fabrication and Packaging Technologies”, 2009 International Image Senor Workshop, Bergen, Norway, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/967,076, filed Apr. 30, 2018 listing Jiantao Kuang et al. as inventors, entitled “Automatic Lens Flare Detection and Correction for Light-Field Images”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/666,298, filed Aug. 1, 2017 listing Yonggang Ha et al. as inventors, entitled “Focal Reducer With Controlled Optical Properties for Interchangeable Lens Light-Field Camera”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,808, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Adaptive Control for Immersive Experience Delivery”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/864,938, filed Jan. 8, 2018 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “Motion Blur for Light-Field Images”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/703,553, filed Sep. 13, 2017 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “4D Camera Tracking and Optical Stabilization”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,841, filed May 9, 2017 listing Kurt Akeley et al. as inventors, entitled “Vantage Generation and Interactive Playback”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,951, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Wedge-Based Light-Field Video Capture”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/944,551, filed Apr. 3, 2018 listing Zejing Wang et al. as inventors, entitled “Generating Dolly Zoom Effect Using Light Field Image Data”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/874,723, filed Jan. 18, 2018 listing Mark Weir et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-Camera Navigation Interface”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,994, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Trevor Carothers et al. as inventors, entitled “Generation of Virtual Reality With 6 Degrees of Freesom From Limited Viewer Data”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/605,037, filed May 25, 2017 listing Zeijing WAng et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Back-Projection to a Light-Field”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,836, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Contour Tracking”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,942, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Contour Tracking With Grabcut”. |
Adelsberger, R. et al., “Spatially Adaptive Photographic Flash,” ETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report 612, 2008, pp. 1-12. |
Adelson et al., “Single Lens Stereo with a Plenoptic Camera” IEEE Translation on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Feb. 1992. vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 99-106. |
Adelson, E. H., and Bergen, J. R. 1991. The plenoptic function and the elements of early vision. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, edited by Michael S. Landy and J. Anthony Movshon. Cambridge, Mass.: mit Press. |
Adobe Systems Inc, “XMP Specification”, Sep. 2005. |
Adobe, “Photoshop CS6 / in depth: Digital Negative (DNG)”, http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2html. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Agarwala, A., et al., “Interactive Digital Photomontage,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004, vol. 32, No. 3, 2004. |
Andreas Observatory, Spectrograph Manual: IV. Flat-Field Correction, Jul. 2006. |
Apple, “Apple iPad: Photo Features on the iPad”, Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Bae, S., et al., “Defocus Magnification”, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 26, Issue 3 (Proc. of Eurographics 2007), pp. 1-9. |
Belhumeur, Peter et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1997, pp. 1060-1066. |
Belhumeur, Peter, et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1999, pp. 33-44, revised version. |
Bhat, P. et al. “GradientShop: A Gradient-Domain Optimization Framework for Image and Video Filtering,” SIGGRAPH 2010; 14 pages. |
Bolles, R., et al., “Epipolar-Plane Image Analysis: An Approach to Determining Structure from Motion”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 7-55 (1987). |
Bourke, Paul, “Image filtering in the Frequency Domain,” pp. 1-9, Jun. 1998. |
Canon, Canon Speedlite wireless flash system, User manual for Model 550EX, Sep. 1998. |
Chai, Jin-Xang et al., “Plenoptic Sampling”, ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, Annual Conference Series, 2000, pp. 307-318. |
Chen, S. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with On-Chip Image Compression Based on Predictive Boundary Adaptation and Memoryless QTD Algorithm,” Very Large Scalee Integration (VLSI) Systems, IEEE Transactions, vol. 19, Issue 4; Apr. 2011. |
Chen, W., et al., “Light Field mapping: Efficient representation and hardware rendering of surface light fields”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 447-456, 2002. |
Cohen, Noy et al., “Enhancing the performance of the light field microscope using wavefront coding,” Optics Express, vol. 22, issue 20; 2014. |
Daly, D., “Microlens Arrays” Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Debevec, et al, “A Lighting Reproduction Approach to Live-Action Compoisting” Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2002. |
Debevec, P., et al., “Acquiring the reflectance field of a human face”, SIGGRAPH 2000. |
Debevec, P., et al., “Recovering high dynamic radiance maps from photographs”, SIGGRAPH 1997, 369-378. |
Design of the xBox menu. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Digital Photography Review, “Sony Announce new RGBE CCD,” Jul. 2003. |
Dorsey, J., et al., “Design and simulation of opera light and projection effects”, in Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 91), vol. 25, 41-50. |
Dorsey, J., et al., “Interactive design of complex time dependent lighting”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 15, 2 (Mar. 1995), 26-36. |
Dowski et al., “Wavefront coding: a modern method of achieving high performance and/or low cost imaging systems” SPIE Proceedings, vol. 3779, Jul. 1999, pp. 137-145. |
Dowski, Jr. “Extended Depth of Field Through Wave-Front Coding,” Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 11, Apr. 10, 1995; pp. 1859-1866. |
Duparre, J. et al., “Micro-Optical Artificial Compound Eyes,” Institute of Physics Publishing, Apr. 2006. |
Eisemann, Elmar, et al., “Flash Photography Enhancement via Intrinsic Relighting”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
Fattal, Raanan, et al., “Multiscale Shape and Detail Enhancement from Multi-light Image Collections”, SIGGRAPH 2007. |
Fernando, Randima, “Depth of Field—A Survey of Techniques,” GPU Gems. Boston, MA; Addison-Wesley, 2004. |
Fitzpatrick, Brad, “Camlistore”, Feb. 1, 2011. |
Fujifilm, Super CCD EXR Sensor by Fujifilm, brochure reference No. EB-807E, 2008. |
Georgiev, T. et al., “Reducing Plenoptic Camera Artifacts,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 1955-1968; 2010. |
Georgiev, T., et al., “Spatio-Angular Resolution Tradeoff in Integral Photography,” Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2006. |
Georgiev, T., et al., “Suppersolution with Plenoptic 2.0 Cameras,” Optical Society of America 2009; pp. 1-3. |
Georgiev, T., et al., “Unified Frequency Domain Analysis of Lightfield Cameras” (2008). |
Georgiev, T., et al., Plenoptic Camera 2.0 (2008). |
Girod, B., “Mobile Visual Search”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Jul. 2011. |
Gortler et al., “The lumigraph” SIGGRAPH 96, pp. 43-54. |
Groen et al., “A Comparison of Different Focus Functions for Use in Autofocus Algorithms,” Cytometry 6:81-91, 1985. |
Haeberli, Paul “A Multifocus Method for Controlling Depth of Field” GRAPHICA Obscura, 1994, pp. 1-3. |
Heide, F. et al., “High-Quality Computational Imaging Through Simple Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, SIGGRAPH 2013; pp. 1-7. |
Heidelberg Collaboratory for Image Processing, “Consistent Depth Estimation in a 4D Light Field,” May 2013. |
Hirigoyen, F., et al., “1.1 um Backside Imager vs. Frontside Image: an optics-dedicated FDTD approach”, IEEE 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop. |
Huang, Fu-Chung et al., “Eyeglasses-free Display: Towards Correcting Visual Aberrations with Computational Light Field Displays,” ACM Transaction on Graphics, Aug. 2014, pp. 1-12. |
Isaksen, A., et al., “Dynamically Reparameterized Light Fields,” SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 297-306. |
Ives H., “Optical properties of a Lippman lenticulated sheet,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 21, 171 (1931). |
Ives, H. “Parallax Panoramagrams Made with a Large Diameter Lens”, Journal of the Optical Society of America; 1930. |
Jackson et al., “Selection of a Convolution Function for Fourier Inversion Using Gridding” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Sep. 1991, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 473-478. |
Kautz, J., et al., “Fast arbitrary BRDF shading for low-frequency lighting using spherical harmonics”, in Eurographic Rendering Workshop 2002, 291-296. |
Koltun, et al., “Virtual Occluders: An Efficient Interediate PVS Representation”, Rendering Techniques 2000: Proc. 11th Eurographics Workshop Rendering, pp. 59-70, Jun. 2000. |
Kopf, J., et al., Deep Photo: Model-Based Photograph Enhancement and Viewing, SIGGRAPH Asia 2008. |
Lehtinen, J., et al. “Matrix radiance transfer”, in Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 59-64, 2003. |
Lesser, Michael, “Back-Side Illumination”, 2009. |
Levin, A., et al., “Image and Depth from a Conventional Camera with a Coded Aperture”, SIGGRAPH 2007, pp. 1-9. |
Levoy et al.,“Light Field Rendering” SIGGRAPH 96 Proceeding, 1996. pp. 31-42. |
Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging” IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 46-55. |
Levoy, M. “Light Field Photography and Videography,” Oct. 18, 2005. |
Levoy, M. “Stanford Light Field Microscope Project,” 2008; http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lfmicroscope/, 4 pages. |
Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Contrast Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010. |
Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Phase Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010. |
Levoy, M., et al., “Light Field Microscopy,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 25, No. 3, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2006. |
Liang, Chia-Kai, et al., “Programmable Aperture Photography: Multiplexed Light Field Acquisition”, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2008. |
Lippmann, “Reversible Prints”, Communication at the French Society of Physics, Journal of Physics, 7 , 4, Mar. 1908, pp. 821-825. |
Lumsdaine et al., “Full Resolution Lightfield Rendering” Adobe Technical Report Jan. 2008, pp. 1-12. |
Maeda, Y. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with Pseudorandom Pixel Placement for Clear Imaging,” 2009 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Dec. 2009. |
Magnor, M. et al., “Model-Aided Coding of Multi-Viewpoint Image Data,” Proceedings IEEE Conference on Image Processing, ICIP—2000, Vancouver, Canada, Sep. 2000. https://graphics.tu-bs.de/static/people/magnor/ publications/icip00.pdf. |
Mallat, Stephane, “A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing”, Academic Press 1998. |
Malzbender, et al., “Polynomial Texture Maps”, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2001. |
Marshall, Richard J. et al., “Improving Depth Estimation from a Plenoptic Camera by Patterned Illumination,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9528, 2015, pp. 1-6. |
Masselus, Vincent, et al., “Relighting with 4D Incident Light Fields”, SIGGRAPH 2003. |
Meynants, G., et al., “Pixel Binning in CMOS Image Sensors,” Frontiers in Electronic Imaging Conference, 2009. |
Moreno-Noguer, F. et al., “Active Refocusing of Images and Videos,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Aug. 2007; pp. 1-9. |
Munkberg, J. et al., “Layered Reconstruction for Defocus and Motion Blur” EGSR 2014, pp. 1-12. |
Naemura et al., “3-D Computer Graphics based on Integral Photography” Optics Express, Feb. 12, 2001. vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 255-262. |
Nakamura, J., “Image Sensors and Signal Processing for Digital Still Cameras” (Optical Science and Engineering), 2005. |
National Instruments, “Anatomy of a Camera,” pp. 1-5, Sep. 6, 2006. |
Nayar, Shree, et al., “Shape from Focus”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 824-831, Aug. 1994. |
Ng, R., et al. “Light Field Photography with a Hand-held Plenoptic Camera,” Stanford Technical Report, CSTR 2005-2, 2005. |
Ng, R., et al., “All-Frequency Shadows Using Non-linear Wavelet Lighting Approximation. ACM Transactions on Graphics,” ACM Transactions on Graphics; Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2003. |
Ng, R., et al., “Triple Product Wavelet Integrals for All-Frequency Relighting”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004). |
Ng, Yi-Ren, “Digital Light Field Photography,” Doctoral Thesis, Standford University, Jun. 2006; 203 pages. |
Ng., R., “Fourier Slice Photography,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, 2005, pp. 735-744. |
Nguyen, Hubert. “Practical Post-Process Depth of Field.” GPU Gems 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley, 2008. |
Roper Scientific Germany, “Fiber Optics”, 2012. |
Sony's First Curved Sensor Photo: http://www.engadget.com. Jul. 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170237971 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62333637 | May 2016 | US | |
62148055 | Apr 2015 | US | |
62148460 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15084326 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 15582237 | US |