Image correction due to deformation of components of a viewing device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11776509
  • Patent Number
    11,776,509
  • Date Filed
    Sunday, October 10, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 3, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A display assembly displays a virtual object in a select location wherein an eye viewing the virtual object has an expected gaze direction. Deformation of the display assembly is detected. The deformation causes the virtual object to be viewable in an altered location wherein the eye has altered gaze direction. The virtual object may be displayed in a corrected location wherein the eye viewing the virtual object in the correct location has a corrected gaze direction that is moved closer to the expected gaze direction than the altered gaze direction.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1). Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to a viewing device and to a method of displaying rendered content, and more specifically to detecting and correcting for deformation of components of the view device.


2). Discussion of Related Art

Viewing devices that provide a rendered image have become popular for computing, entertainment and other purposes. A viewing device is usually a wearable device with a display for rendering the image and may include various features such as the ability to have the user see a three-dimensional image, to have the user see a rendering within a real world environment with or without fixing its location within the real world environment, and displaying video or other moving renderings to the user.


A viewing device has various components that deform over time due to its use. When these components deform, a virtual object that is rendered may not be in its original location when the viewing device was still new. For example, a background application may display a virtual object in a fixed location relative to the viewing device or in a fixed location relative to real world objects surrounding the user. In some instances, the viewing device may have a see-through display so that the user can see the real world objects and the perceive the rendered objects in a fixed location relative to the real world objects. The user may, for example, perceive a rendered coffee mug on a real world table. When the components of the viewing device deform, the coffee mug may not be rendered on the table anymore, but instead float at some distance above the table. The coffee mug is thus not displayed to the user in a manner that is true to reality. In addition, if the coffee mug is used as an interface element for the user to interact with the background application, there may be a mismatch between where the background application expects the coffee mug to be and where the user interacts with the coffee mug.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a viewing device for displaying rendered content including a display assembly configured to display a virtual object in a select location on the display assembly, wherein an eye viewing the virtual object has an expected gaze direction; and a deformation detection system connected to the display assembly and configured to detect a measured gaze direction of the eye viewing the virtual object on the display assembly and calculate a deformation of the display assembly based on the measured gaze direction being an altered gaze direction that is different from the expected gaze direction.


The invention also provides a method of displaying rendered content including displaying, with a display assembly, a virtual object in a select location on the display assembly wherein an eye viewing the virtual object has an expected gaze direction and detecting a deformation of the display assembly, wherein the deformation causes the virtual object to be viewable in an altered location wherein the eye has an altered gaze direction.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is further described by way of examples wherein:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a viewing device, according to an embodiment of the invention that displays rendered content to an eye of a user;



FIG. 2A is a perspective view of an eye and an optical display of the viewing device, wherein the optical display is undeformed;



FIG. 2B is a view similar to FIG. 2A wherein the optical display is deformed;



FIG. 3A is a perspective view illustrating how a location of a rendered object is established;



FIGS. 3B and 3C are front views that illustrate how a rendered object is moved;



FIG. 3D is a top plan view illustrating how a location of a rendered object can be moved using different insertion angles that are provided by a laser projector;



FIG. 4 is a perspective view illustrating potential gaze vector errors;



FIGS. 5A to 5D illustrate a statistical approach for determining a likely location of a virtual object and incremental movement of the virtual object to correct for its displacement;



FIGS. 6A to 6C illustrate movement of a virtual object due to display deformation and correction of movement of the virtual object;



FIGS. 7A to 7E illustrate movement of the virtual object due to display deformation with a corresponding change in gaze angle (FIGS. 7A to 7B), the effect of deformation of an eye tracking camera on a calculated gaze angle (FIGS. 7C and 7D), and correction of the gaze angle (FIG. 7E);



FIGS. 8A to 8D illustrate movement of a virtual object and a corresponding change in gaze vector (FIGS. 8A and 8B), and the effect of deformation of an eye tracking camera on a calculated gaze angle (FIGS. 8C and 8D);



FIG. 9 illustrates one solution to rectify a resultant change in gaze angle as represented in FIG. 8D;



FIGS. 10A to 10C illustrate a different solution than FIG. 9 to rectify the resultant gaze angle in FIG. 8D;



FIG. 11 is view similar to FIG. 1, further illustrating a reference system of the viewing device for purposes of integrating the process shown in FIGS. 10A to 10C;



FIG. 12 is a flow chart illustrating functioning of the viewing device; and



FIG. 13 is a block diagram of a machine in the form of a computer that can find application in the present invention system, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION


FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawings illustrates a viewing device 20, according to an embodiment of the invention that is used to display rendered content to an eye 22 of a user. The viewing device 20 includes a display assembly 24, a deformation detection system 26, a user input device 28 and a correction system 30.


The display assembly 24 includes a video data receiver 32, a projector 34 and an optical display 36 connected directly or indirectly to one another. The display assembly 24 includes a structure (not shown) that is securable to a head of a user with the optical display 36 in front of the eye 22 of the user. The optical display 36 is a transparent component that allows the eye 22 to see objects in the real world behind the optical display 36 and can simultaneously project virtual images to the user such that light associated with real and virtual objects is visible to the user.


The video data receiver 32 is connected or connectable to a video data channel which carries color and intensity values of pixels. The projector 34 has a laser and a scanner that are capable of creating a two-dimensional pattern based on the video data. The optical display 36 is located in a position for the laser of the projector 34 to couple laser light into the optical display 36. The laser light then propagates through the optical display 36 and exits the optical display 36 through a pupil of the optical display 36 towards the eye 22. The eye 22 thus receives light from the real world objects behind the optical display 36 and light that is generated by the projector 34. An augmented reality view is then created on a retina 38 of the eye 22, the augmented reality view including light from the real world scene visible to the user through the optical display 36 combined with light created by the projector 34 that represents virtual content.


The deformation detection system 26 includes an attention generation unit 40, an input trigger 42, an eye tracking camera 44, a gaze angle calculation module 46, a statistical system 48, and a correction calculation unit 50.


The attention generation unit 40 is connected to the video data receiver 32. The attention generation unit 40 is configured to provide an override functionality to the video data receiver 32. The attention generation unit 40 may for example insert a virtual object within the data stream received by the video data receiver 32, change the color of a virtual object and/or reduce the size of a virtual object for the purpose of having the eye 22 direct its gaze angle towards the virtual object and focus on the virtual object. While an attention generation unit 40 is described, virtual content that can be used as a basis for calibrating an augmented reality system may generally be provided by a rendering system or module.


The input trigger 42 is connected to the user input device 28 and detects a user input through the user input device 28. The user input device 28 may for example be one or more of a joy stick, a wand, a camera that tracks a body part of the user, a button, a touchpad, a sensor-equipped glove, a mouse, a keyboard, etc. The user input device 28 provides an input to the input trigger 42.


The eye tracking camera 44 is mounted to the display assembly 24 in a position to capture an image of the eye 22. In some embodiments, one or more camera per eye is used to image a user's eyes. Alternatively, a single camera having a sufficiently wide angle to capture an image including both of the user's eyes may be used.


The gaze angle calculation module 46 is connected to the eye tracking camera 44 and the input trigger 42. The gaze angle calculation module 46 calculates a gaze angle of the eye 22 based on an image captured by the eye tracking camera 44. The gaze angle calculation module 46 is connected to the input trigger 42 and is activated by the input trigger 42 such that a gaze angle is calculated by the gaze angle calculation module 46 when a user input is detected. While the system is described using a calculated gaze angle, any other eye gaze orientation characteristic may also be used such as, for example, a gaze vector, a gaze coordinate, a visual axis orientation, or a cornea center location. Additionally, gaze data from the left and right eyes may be used in combination to gather information about the location on which a user's eyes are focused.


The statistical system 48 is connected to the gaze angle calculation module 46 and receives a large number of gaze angle calculation measurements. The statistical system 48 records a gaze angle received from the gaze angle calculation module 46 each time that the input trigger 42 activates the gaze angle calculation module 46. The statistical system 48 thus collects a number of gaze angles over a period of time. The statistical system 48 then calculates a statistically relevant gaze angle, for example a median gaze angle from the gaze angles that are recorded by the statistical system 48. A representative gaze angle may be selected or calculated and may be used in a comparison to an expected gaze angle associated with the displaying of virtual content. If the representative gaze angle is substantially different from the expected gaze angle, deformation within the system is concluded to have occurred.


The correction calculation unit 50 is connected to the statistical system 48. The correction calculation unit 50 calculates a desired correction in the location of the rendered virtual object that is created or modified by the attention generation unit 40.


The correction system 30 is connected to the correction calculation unit 50. The correction system 30 receives correction data from the correction calculation unit 50. The video data receiver 32 is connected to the correction system 30. The correction system 30 modifies the location of the virtual object that is created or modified by the attention generation unit 40. The correction system 30 also modifies the locations of all other objects in the video stream by the same amount and direction that the location of the virtual object generated and modified by the attention generation unit 40 is corrected.


In use, the user attaches the viewing device 20 to their head with the optical display 36 in front of the eye 22. The user can then see real world objects through the transmissive optical display 36 and can simultaneously view rendered virtual content.


The video data receiver 32 receives video data from a background application. The background application may for example be a movie application for displaying a movie, a game, a web browser, a menu, a launcher, two-dimensional content, three-dimensional content or any other type of virtual content. The video data includes data representing frames of images that are received at video data rates. The video data includes pixels with intensity and color values. The video data receiver 32 provides the video data to the projector 34. The projector 34 creates a two-dimensional pattern for each frame. The pattern may include laser light bundles, with each bundle representing a respective pixel, and its intensity and color being modulated. The projector 34 couples the pattern into the optical display 36 either directly or indirectly through lenses, mirrors, gratings, or the like. The pattern transmits through the optical display 36 and exits the optical display 36 towards the eye 22. The light beam 54 represents light that transmits from the optical display 36 towards the eye 22. It should however be understood that many light beams representing a virtual object are projected from the optical display 36 such that the image received by the retina 38 resembles the pattern created by the projector 34. In some embodiments the virtual object may be perceived by a user as being three-dimensional due to one or more wavefront shaping techniques applied to the light representing the virtual object. A dynamic image can be seen by the user in embodiments where the pattern continuously changes with each frame of data that is provided by the video data receiver 32 to the projector 34.


The video data that is received by the video data receiver 32 includes data representing one or more objects that are to be displayed on the retina 38 of the eye 22. A virtual object that is represented in the data received by the video data receiver 32 may actually be displayed on the optical display 36. However, it is possible that such a virtual object is not visible or easily discernible on a surface of the optical display 36 due to a number of factors including that the optical display 36 is a see-through display and/or that the optical display 36 primarily serves as a waveguide to direct light between the projector 34 and the eye 22. The video data provided by the video data receiver 32 to the projector 34 still includes data representing objects even if the virtual objects may not be visible on the surface of the optical display 36. For purposes of discussion, it will be assumed that a virtual object or objects are visible on a surface of the optical display 36. It should however be understood that objects are shown on a surface of the optical display 36 for ease of illustration. The invention deals primarily with a calibration methodology that is the same whether objects are actually visible or not visible on a surface of the optical display 36.


During normal operation of the viewing device, the attention generation unit 40 does not provide an override functionality to the normal operation of the video data receiver 32. All video data is presented to the user at a video refresh rate without any interference of the deformation detection system 26. The deformation detection system 26 only overrides the normal functionality of the video data receiver 32 a few times per day (e.g., 50 to 100 times per day of continued use) to take measurements while the video data receiver 32 proceeds uninterrupted for the remainder of the time. The user input device 28 and the eye tracking camera 44 are connected to the background application. During normal operation of the video data receiver 32, the user may use the user input device 28 to provide instructions to the background application or to otherwise interact with virtual content rendered on the optical display 36 while the one or more eye tracking cameras 44 continue to monitor the eyes 22. The user may for example use the user input device 28 to interact with a virtual object that is displayed to the user via the optical display 36 while the background application relies on the eye tracking camera 44 to know when the user is looking at the virtual object.


There is very little or no deformation of the display assembly 24 following factory calibration of the viewing device 20. Objects that are displayed using the optical display 36 are in their expected locations relative to a gaze angle of the eye 22. Over time with use of the viewing device 20, components of the viewing device 20 including or connected to the display assembly 24 begin to deform. The deformation may manifest in a deformation of the optical display 36, deformation of hinges and deformation of materials that are used in the structure that mounts the viewing device 20 to the head of the user. The deformation is usually due to a combination of small or large stresses that are placed on the components of the display assembly 24 and the materials of the components of the display assembly 24. Stresses may for example be created when cabling that are connected to the optical display 36 pull on the optical display 36, when a user fits the viewing device 20 to their head or removes it from their head and when the user operates the hinges, springs, or other dynamic components for purposes of unpacking or storing the viewing device 20. The material properties of the components of the display assembly 24 may be subjected to fatigue when stresses are cycled and it is known that plastics materials experience “creep” when subjected to stresses over time. Some materials of the viewing device 20 may also experience thermal loading, and such changes in temperature may contribute to deformation of one or more components. The result of the deformation is that the actual location at which virtual objects appear to the user on a deformed viewing device 20 is not the intended rendering location of those virtual objects. As a result, the actual gaze of the user is different from the gaze that would be expected if the user were to look at the rendered virtual content at its intended rendering location. In addition, deformation is continuous, so it is expected that the rendering location of virtual objects as perceived by the user will continue to move over time relative to the intended rendering location. The display assembly 24 initially displays a virtual object in a select location wherein the eye 22 has an expected gaze direction. The deformation of the display assembly 24 causes the virtual object to be viewable in an altered location wherein the eye 22 has an altered gaze direction.


One or more components of the deformation detection system 26 may be functionally and structurally connected to the display assembly 24 to detect the deformation of the display assembly. The correction system 30 is connected to the deformation detection system 26. The correction system 30 displays, with the display assembly 24, the virtual object in a corrected location. When the virtual object is displayed in the corrected location, the eye 22 viewing the virtual object in the corrected location has a corrected gaze direction that is moved closer to the expected gaze direction than the altered gaze direction. The deformation detection system 26 provides an overriding or augmentation functionality to the normal operation of the viewing device 20 described above. The deformation detection system 26 is intermittently activated, for example 10 to 20 times per hour during continuous operation. In addition, the deformation detection system 26 is only activated for a few seconds, for example three to seven seconds, which is as long as is needed to take measurements and make an adjustment. The viewing device 20 operates normally during the remainder of the time.


The functioning of the deformation detection system 26 is initiated by activating the attention generation unit 40 while the user input device 28 is connected to the input trigger 42 and the eye tracking camera 44 continues to monitor the eye 22. What is primarily required is for the user to interact with a rendered object that is received by the video data receiver 32 from the background application that is small enough to minimize gaze vector error. The attention generation unit 40 may also modify the color of the virtual object or reduce its size to grab the user's attention and help draw the eye 22 to a small point where the virtual object is located. The video data receiver 32 provides data representing the virtual object to the projector 34. The projector 34 then generates light and projects the light representing the virtual object toward the optical display 36 for viewing by the user.


The virtual object that is being placed or modified by the attention generation unit 40 is of the kind that requires that the user interact with the rendered virtual object using the user input device 28. Such a virtual object may for example be a play button, a target, an application launching icon, etc. When the user uses the user input device 28 to interact with the rendered virtual object, the eye 22 of the user is assumed to be looking at that rendered virtual object on the optical display 36. The eye tracking camera 44 captures an image of the eyes 22 and provides the image data to the gaze angle calculation module 46. The user input device 28 activates the input trigger 42, which instructs the gaze angle calculation module 46 to calculate a gaze angle of the eye 22 using the data received from the eye tracking camera 44. The gaze angle that is calculated by the gaze angle calculation module 46 is representative of an actual location of the rendered virtual object on the optical display 36 as perceived by the user.


The gaze angle calculation module 46 provides the gaze angle to the statistical system 48. The statistical system 48 stores the gaze angle. When the deformation detection system 26 is activated a second time, the process is repeated and the statistical system 48 stores a second gaze angle. The process is repeated until the statistical system 48 has stored enough gaze angles to allow the statistical system 48 to calculate a statistically relevant altered gaze angle. The statistical system 48 may for example calculate an average, a mean or a median gaze angle from the collected gaze angles. The statistical system may calculate a statistically relevant gaze angle from all the measurements, although it is preferably that the statistical system only uses gaze angles that are outside a predetermined error range (e.g., 90 arcminutes) as data points for calculating a statistically relevant gaze angle. Alternatively, in some embodiments, rather than accumulating multiple measurements to calculate a statistically determined gaze angle before performing an incremental correction, each measured gaze angle that is determined to lie outside of a tolerance error of the expected gaze angle may result in an incremental correction to the rendering location of virtual content.


The statistical system 48 provides the altered gaze angle to the correction calculation unit 50. The correction calculation unit 50 determines the amount of correction that is needed in the gaze angle to return the gaze angle from the altered gaze angle back to the expected gaze angle. The correction calculation unit 50 calculates both the direction and the amount of correction that is required and then calculates an actual correction that is only a small fragment of the required correction. The correction calculation unit 50 then provides the actual correction to the correction system 30. The correction system 30 provides the correction to the video data receiver 32. The video data receiver 32 then moves the virtual object generated by the attention generation unit 40 and all other objects in accordance with the direction and magnitude of the actual correction received from the correction system 30.


The statistical system 48 may require a large number of measurements, for example 50 to 100 measurements, before providing an altered gaze angle to the correction calculation unit 50. In addition, any correction that is made is only a small fraction of the actual change in the gaze angle due to the deformation of the display assembly 24. The cumulative correction is thus a slow process. By way of example, only a single correction may be made during continuous operation of eight hours in one day and it may take several days or weeks for the gaze angle to be corrected within tolerance of the expected gaze angle. Alternatively, several small corrections may be made during use of the device. The number of corrections may depend on how many times a user interacts with virtual content that is considered to be reliable for gaze angle calculation and rendering location calibration. Such a slow process allows for recalculation in case that a mistake is made and allows for continued acceleration and deceleration of the deformation of the display assembly 24 with less risk of over shooting the required correction that has to be made given continued deformation of the display assembly 24.


In FIG. 2A the undeformed shape 60 represents the optical display 36 before deformation. A rendered object 62 is placed in the optical display 36 to attract the attention of the user. When the user looks at the rendered object 62, an actual gaze vector 64 can be defined. The actual gaze vector 64 is a direction or axis along which the eye 22 is directed for purposes of viewing a virtual object. The actual gaze vector extends from a center point 22 of the eye 22 through a center of a pupil of the eye. In order to calculate the actual gaze vector 64, one approach would be to first calculate the actual center point 22 of the eye 22. It may also be possible to calculate the actual gaze vector 64 without calculating the actual center point 22 of the eye 22, but instead to use other anatomical information of the eye for that purpose. The expected gaze vector 64 extends through the optical display 36 and the user perceives the rendered object 62 as an augmented object 68. The augmented object 68 is located in a plane that is represented by an undeformed shape 70. Because the plane of the undeformed shape 70 is farther than a plane of the optical display 36, the user perceives the augmented object 68 to be larger than the rendered object 62 and a field defined by the undeformed shape 70 to be larger than a field defined by the undeformed shape 60. The user also perceives a table 72. The perception that the user has is that of the table 72 augmented with rendered virtual content represented in FIG. 2A by the augmented object 68.


Multiple infrared light emitting diodes (LED's) 74 may be included in the eye tracking system. Each LED 74 transmits infrared light that forms a respective infrared spot (a “glint”) 76 on a surface of the eye 22. Reference number 78 represents infrared light that reflects from the spot 76 towards the eye tracking camera 44. The eye tracking camera 44 captures the locations of all of the spots created by the LED's 74 on the surface of the eye 22. The locations of the spots 76 are used by the gaze angle calculation module 46 to calculate the gaze angle or gaze vector of the eye 22. In some embodiments, eye tracking cameras may also capture a location of a pupil. Pupil location data can be used in combination with infrared glints to determine an eye position. A gaze angle or gaze vector may be calculated or otherwise determined based on the eye position information.


The expected gaze vector 64 is shown in FIG. 2A passing through a center of rendered object 62 and augmented object 68. Reference number 82 represents light reflecting from the eye 22 that is captured by the eye tracking camera 44. In some embodiments, the eye tracking camera 44 thus captures an orientation of the eye and the location of the pupil 80. The gaze angle calculation module 46 calculates the actual gaze vector (which in FIG. 2A is coincident to the expected gaze vector 64) using at least the location of the interactable rendered virtual content. In some embodiments, the location of the eye 22 with respect to the optical display 36 may also be used.


It may not always be necessary to take measurement for purposes of determining a pre-deformation gaze angle. For example, when the viewing device 20 is new, it can be assumed that the display assembly 24 is undeformed and that the gaze angle of the eye 22 is as represented by the expected gaze vector 64 when the rendered object 62 is located as shown. The rendered object 62 can thus be located as shown and the expected initial gaze vector 64 can be determined without any additional measurements. The expected and actual gaze angles will change based on location of the rendered content. While an “initial” gaze angle or “pre-deformation” gaze angle could be calculated, an expected gaze vector can be assumed from the background application or from a previous calculation. A difference can then be calculated between the assumed expected gaze angle and actual gaze angle that is newly being calculated.


In FIG. 2B, the shape 86 represents deformation of the optical display 36. The deformation of the optical display 36 is represented by the difference in the shape 86 when compared to the undeformed shape 60. The rendered object 62 is still rendered in the same (x, y) location on the display but deformation of the display with respect to the user has the user perceive the content at a location different from the intended location. Due to the deformation, the rendered object 62 is no longer in the location shown in FIG. 2A, but it has moved by a distance and a direction as represented by the vector 88. The rendered object 62 has thus moved in a direction that is a result of the deformation of the optical display 36 in the area of the rendered object 62. An altered gaze vector 90 is defined between the eye 22 and the rendered object 62. The user views the rendered object 62 as an augmented object 68 within a plane as represented by the shape 92. The shape 92 is deformed relative to the undeformed shape 70 in a manner similar to the deformation between the shape 86 and the undeformed shape 60.


When the user looks at the augmented object 68, the actual gaze vector 90 passes from the eye 22 to the location of the augmented object 68 in the deformed shape 92. In this example, the actual gaze vector 90 is different from the expected gaze vector 64. The eye tracking camera 44 continues to capture eye location information, which may be based on pupil location within images and/or glint reflection patterns, so that the gaze angle calculation module 46 can calculate the actual gaze vector 90 and compare it to the expected gaze vector 64 to infer whether display assembly deformation has occurred.



FIG. 3A illustrates how the location of the rendered object 62 is corrected. The projector 34 projects image light 94 associated with a virtual image or object at a predetermined angle toward the optical display 36. The image light 94 may encounter one or more diffractive optical elements, such as an incoupling grating 95, an orthogonal pupil expander 97, and an exit pupil expander 99, disposed in or on a waveguide 101 as part of the optical display 36. As the image light 94 propagates through the waveguide 101, the diffractive optical elements redirect the light in different ways, ultimately resulting in the image light 94 exiting the waveguide through the exit pupil expander 99 toward the user's eyes 22. The user's eye 22 can focus image light 94 at a location on the retina for the user to perceive the rendered object 62.


Referring to FIGS. 3B and 3C, two examples of images projected as image light 94 are shown. In FIG. 3B, virtual content object 115 is shown in the center of the image 94a. When image 94a is projected toward an undeformed optical display 36 and travels through the components thereof, the user will see virtual content object 115 centered in the field of view. However, if image 94a is projected toward a deformed display, the virtual content object 115 may be perceived by the user to have shifted to the right, for example, such that it is no longer centered in the field of view. To correct for the shift caused by deformation and detected by comparing expected and actual gaze vectors, the image 94b may be projected instead of image 94a. In image 94b, the virtual content object 115 is shifted toward the left of the image such that when the light exits the deformed display at a rightward shift, the display's right shift cancels out the content's left shift and the virtual content object 115 appears to the user to be centered in the field of view. The pixel shifting may be accomplished by lighting up different pixels of a spatial light modulator (SLM) within the projector 34 using LED or other similar light sources. In such an adjustment method, it may be useful to convert the actual and expected gaze angles or gaze vectors into a display coordinate system. For example, the system may expect for a user's gaze to center on pixels at coordinates (x1, y1) but finds that the user's gaze is actually centered on pixels at coordinates (x2, y2) in the display coordinate system. In such a method, pixel shifting can be adjusted by an amount equal and opposite to the difference between the expected viewing coordinates and the actual viewing coordinates as determined by the user's gaze vector. Alternative means for adjusting the rendering location of virtual content may also be used.


In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 3D, correction may be accomplished by adjusting the projector 34 itself. For a complete correction, the rendering location of the rendered object 62 has to move from the location 100 in a direction represented by a vector 102 to a corrected location 104. For a complete correction, the projector 34 may insert light 106 at an adjusted angle into the diffractive optical elements of the optical display 36 so that the rendered object 62 is viewable nearer to an intended location within the field of view. The user will perceive the rendered object 62 to have moved from the location 100 along vector 102 toward the location 104. However, a complete correction is not made. Instead, the rendered object 62 is moved by a small fraction of the distance between location 100 and location 104 along the direction represented by the vector 102. The projector 34, for purposes of making a partial correction, thus inserts light at an angle that is slightly steeper than the image light 94, but not as steep as the light 106.



FIG. 4 illustrates potential gaze vector errors 120 and 122 at two user interaction events. Anatomically an eye is continually moving when it is focused on a static image, such as the augmented object 68. Natural eye movement typically results in about 60 arcminutes of error or deviation from a central gaze vector corresponding to the direct path from a selected anatomical marker of the eye, for example the center point 66 of the eye 22, to augmented object 68. In some embodiments, the gaze vector may be defined as a direct path from the center of a cornea of an eye to the augmented object 68, or may be defined as the extension of the visual axis of the eye. If the user looks at the augmented object 68, gaze vectors within an expected gaze vector range having a 60 arcminute radius from the gaze vector 90 may considered to be directed toward the location of augmented object 68. The gaze angle calculation module 46 in FIG. 1 may also have some error for given eye sizes, shapes, etc. and such an additional error can add, for example, around 30 arcminutes to the expected gaze vector range radius. When it is determined that the user is looking at the augmented object 68 and a gaze vector that is calculated is within a 90 arcminute radius of the gaze vector 90, the system is considered to be well calibrated.


One challenge is that the relatively large 90 arcminute radius of error in gaze vector makes it difficult to determine the exact location of the actual perceived position of the augmented object 68. In order to account for potential errors, the statistical system 48 in FIG. 1 may collect multiple data points to discover trends. The trends in the determined gaze vectors are accumulated to discover the likely location of the actual perceived position of the augmented object 68 as displayed by a system having some amount of deformation. Because it is still uncertain how much of the position discrepancy is noise due to eye motion or algorithm errors and how much is due to actual deformation of the display assembly 24 in FIG. 1, a complete correction of the gaze vector is not carried out. By way of example, correction increments can be between 0.01 to 0.5 arcminutes, for example 0.1 arcminutes. Alternatively, the correction increment amount can be based on the amount of deformation detected, with a larger deformation necessitating larger increments. By way of example, the correction increments may be two orders of magnitude smaller than the detected deformation amount.



FIGS. 5A to 5D illustrate one of many scenarios that may unfold. In FIG. 5A, a number of gaze vector measurements are taken that point to locations 124A to 124C. The empty circles of locations 124A to 124C represent measured gaze angles that have been calculated. The dark circle of the location 126 indicates it is the location where the system expected the virtual object to be. The measured gaze vectors locations 124A to 124C are used by the system to calculate a statistically relevant location 130 of where the virtual object is now likely to be located. The measured gaze vectors at locations 124A to 124C indicate that a virtual object may have moved from an initial expected location 126 in a direction as represented by a vector 128 to a statistically determined altered location 130. In FIG. 5B, the virtual object rendering position is moved in a direction represented by a vector 132 which is opposite to the direction represented by a vector 128 and smaller in magnitude. The assumption is that the virtual object was located at the location 130 and has been moved to a new location 134 along a direction of the vector 132 toward the expected rendering location 126.


In FIG. 5C, further data points 124D to 124G are collected that statistically determine that the virtual object is located at an altered location 136. The location 136 is on an opposite side of the location 126 than the location 130. The change in object location may be a result of continued deformation of the display system. It is also possible that an error was made due to noisey data in FIG. 5A when determining that the virtual object was at the location 130 and/or that the virtual object has moved in an opposite direction. When adjusting the rendering location by the vector 132 as shown in FIG. 5B, if the virtual object was actually perceived to be in location 136 as shown in FIG. 5C, it can be seen that it is possible that through an incorrect recalibration in FIG. 5B, the virtual object may have been moved to a new location 138. The location of the vector 132 in FIG. 5B thus represents how the system “believed” it was moving the virtual object at the time of FIG. 5B, although it can now be seen that the vector 132 is in a different location in FIG. 5C to represent how the virtual object was more likely moved at the time of FIG. 5B now that more data is available for purposes of analyzing the location of the virtual object. The vector 132 has the same magnitude and direction in FIGS. 5B and 5C. The only difference in the vector 132 between FIGS. 5B and 5C is that the location of the vector 132 is different, with the location of the vector 132 in FIG. 5B representing how the system believed it was moving the virtual object and the location of the vector 132 in FIG. 5C representing what had likely happened when the virtual object was moved in FIG. 5C. In FIG. 5C it can be seen that the movement of the virtual object from the location 136 in the direction represented by a vector 132 to the location 138, which can be traced back to FIG. 5B, was an error because the virtual object was moved further from the expected location 126 instead of nearer to it. In such an example, it is advantageous that incremental adjustments are made rather than complete adjustments.


In FIG. 5D, further data points 124H to 124L are collected which indicate that the virtual object is likely at a new location 140. The vector 132 is in its same location in FIG. 5D as in FIG. 5C to represent the error that was made at the time of FIG. 5B. The location 140 has passed the location 138 and the mistake that was made by moving the virtual object in the direction represented by a vector 132 to the location 138 has thus been eviscerated.



FIGS. 5A to 5D do not illustrate every possible scenario that may unfold, but merely serve to illustrate that by moving the virtual object in small increments as opposed to a single large movement that attempts to correct for all the movement of the virtual object due to the deformation of the display assembly 24, incorrect adjustments that could be made based on noisy data are prevented from being noticeable to a user.



FIG. 6A illustrates a view as seen by the user, including a real world table 72 and a rendered object in the form of a coffee mug, which may for example be the augmented object 68 in the planes of the shapes 70 and 92 in FIG. 2B. The coffee mug has been moved in the view of the user as represented by the vector 150. The designation “Display” at the vector 150 indicates that undeformed shape the movement of the virtual object, as shown by the vector 150, is due to deformation of the display assembly 24 in FIG. 1.



FIG. 6B illustrates the movement of the gaze angle as calculated by the gaze angle calculation module 46 in FIG. 1 based on the view of the eye tracking camera 44 in FIG. 1. The deformation of the display assembly 24 in FIG. 1 results in movement of the gaze angle as measured by the eye tracking camera 44 in the direction indicated by the vector 152. The vectors 150 and 152 in FIGS. 6A and 6B are equal to one another. The movement in the gaze angle that is calculated in FIG. 6B is thus the same as the movement of the virtual object within the vision of the user as shown in FIG. 6A, subject to the tolerances of the eye and the tracking algorithms as described with reference to FIG. 4.


In FIG. 6C, the virtual object is incrementally moved in a direction that is shown by the vectors 154. The vectors 154 are in a direction opposite to the vector 152, but each vector is only a fraction of the length of the vector 152. The sum of the vectors 154 equals the vector 152 except in an opposite direction. If the virtual object is moved by the entire distance of all the vectors 154, the virtual object is, over time, returned to its position before the deformation of the display assembly 24 as shown in FIG. 6A, and earlier movement of the virtual object due to display deformation is accounted for.



FIGS. 6A to 6C illustrate the scenario where there is no deformation of the eye tracking camera 44 in FIG. 1. Because there is no deformation of the eye tracking camera 44, measurements taken by the eye tracking camera 44 result in measurements of gaze angles that match the actual gaze angles of the eye 22 of the user with respect to the display, subject to the tolerances discussed above.



FIGS. 7A to 7E collectively illustrate an effect that deformation of the eye tracking camera 44 in FIG. 1 can have in combination with deformation of the display. FIG. 7A illustrates the movement of the virtual object within the view of the user due to the deformation of the display assembly 24 in FIG. 1 if deformation of the camera is not taken into consideration. FIG. 7A is thus the same as FIG. 6A. It should be noted that the any deformation of the eye tracking camera 44 does not affect the positioning of the virtual object within the vision of the user as illustrated in FIG. 7A, but affects the gaze vector that is calculated with respect to the display. Therefore, even if there is also camera deformation and the effect of camera deformation is taken into consideration, FIG. 7A will still represent movement of the virtual object within the vision of the user.



FIG. 7B illustrates the movement of the gaze angle as calculated by the gaze angle calculation module 46 in FIG. 1 based on image data received from the eye tracking camera 44 if, as with FIG. 7A we do not take the effect of camera deformation into consideration. FIG. 7B, thus assumes no deformation of the eye tracking camera 44 and is therefore the same as FIG. 6B.



FIG. 7C illustrates the effect of the calculated gaze angle when we take the effect of deformation of the eye tracking camera 44 into consideration but without the effect of deformation of the display. Referring to FIG. 2A, deformation of the eye tracking camera 44 causes error in the position measurement of the eye 22 within the view of the eye tracking camera 44. Such error in the eye tracking camera 44 causes a change in the image data that the eye tracking camera 44 provides to the gaze angle calculation module 46 in FIG. 1. The gaze angle that is calculated by the gaze angle calculation module 46 is thus affected by the deformation of the eye tracking camera 44. FIG. 7C illustrates movement of the gaze angle that is calculated due to deformation of the eye tracking camera 44 and is represented by the vector 156. The error in gaze angle accuracy with respect to the display that is caused by camera deformation is usually relatively small. The movement in the gaze angle due to camera deformation is typically on the order of about 1/20 of the movement in the gaze angle due to display deformation.



FIG. 7D illustrates a resultant 158 of the vectors 152 and 156. In the present example, the vector 156 representing the effect of the camera deformation is at an angle of less than 90° of the vector 152 representing the display deformation. The vector of the resultant 158 is therefore longer than the vector 152 representing the effect of the display deformation.


In FIG. 7E, the virtual object is moved within the vision of the user as represented by the vectors 160. Each vector 160 is in a direction that is opposite to the resultant 58 in FIG. 7D. The virtual object is moved in increments each time the user interacts with an eligible virtual object. Over a period of days or weeks, the correction vectors 160 add up to the resultant 158 within the anatomical eye tolerance plus any tolerance required by tracking algorithms. As noted before, the effect of the camera deformation is relatively small. The virtual object is thus moved from a location that is closer to its location shown in FIG. 7A than in its location shown in FIG. 7E. In the case of the virtual coffee mug which is intended to appear to the user to be sitting on the table 72, the coffee mug will thus return to the top of a table or very close to the top of the table.



FIGS. 8A and 8B are similar to FIGS. 7A and 7B. In FIG. 8C, the effect of camera deformation results in a movement of the gaze angle as represented by the vector 164. An angle between the vector 164 and the vector 152 is more than 90°.



FIG. 8D illustrates a resultant vector 166. The resultant vector 166 represents the calculated change in the gaze angle due to the display deformation and the camera deformation. The resultant vector 166 is smaller than the vector 152 representing the effect of the display deformation. The effect of the display deformation and the camera deformation can be said to be in “opposite” directions in FIG. 8D and in the “same” directions in FIG. 7D.



FIG. 9 illustrates one possible solution when the effect of the display deformation and the effect of the camera deformation are in opposite directions on the calculated gaze angle. The correction system 30 in FIG. 1 does not modify the positioning of the virtual object. The user may, for example, not care whether a “play” button is located on a table or floating at some distance above the table. In addition, the play button should function properly as an interface element for the background application.



FIGS. 10A to 10C illustrate a solution as an alternative to the solution in FIG. 9. In FIG. 10A, the gaze angle change due to deformation of the camera is calculated starting when the viewing device is still new, also referred to as the “out-of-box” condition. The change in a calculated eye position with respect to the eye tracking camera due to camera deformation is periodically determined using the eye tracking camera 44 and data analysis of the generated eye tracking images. The methodology for calculating an eye position or eye center at any particular time is similar to the methodology described with reference to FIG. 2A. Images of the eyes 22 continue to serve as a basis for calculating eye center positions of each eye with respect to the one or more eye tracking cameras. Change in the eye center positions within collected image frames can be attributed to changes in location of the eye tracking cameras with respect to the eyes. While there is some error associated with device fit and consistency of how the user dons the device, the use of multiple image frames in the data analysis improves accuracy of determining eye tracking camera deformations. For example, the eye center calculated from eye tracking images taken during a setup phase of the device is determined to be at some coordinate location (x, y, z). Over time, eye tracking camera deformation could occur such that the camera tilts slightly downward. The position of the eye in the images captured with the deformed eye tracking camera will change such that the eye center is shown to be at a higher y-axis location, for example at a coordinate location (x, y+1, z) within the eye tracking image. The change between the two coordinate locations is linked to the change in the eye tracking camera and that difference can be used to correct a rendering location of virtual content on the display. The eye tracking camera deformation is represented in FIG. 10A as vector 170 and can occur in one, two, or three dimensions.


The eye tracking camera 44 runs continuously, for example at a rate of 30 frames per second. In determining the deformation of the eye tracking camera 44, it is not necessary to wait for the user to interact with particular virtual content renderings for data collection to take place. A stream of image data may be available for comparison to baseline at any given time. The use of a set of data points from the eye tracking camera 44 to compare against the baseline data provides for a robust system. For example, the use of at least the last 10 images from the eye tracking camera 44 can improve accuracy over the use of only one or two images.



FIG. 10B illustrates that the vector 166 is the sum of the vectors 152 and 170. The vector 152 can be calculated by deducting the camera deformation vector 170 from the vector 166. Because the vector 152 represents the effect of the display deformation on the location of the virtual object, the virtual object can be moved in direction opposite to the vector 152.


In FIG. 10C, the virtual object is incrementally moved as represented by the vectors 172. A sum of the vectors 172 is equal to the vector 152, but in an opposite direction.


As shown in FIG. 11, the viewing device 20 may further include a reference system 180 for purposes of the making the calculations as shown in FIGS. 10A to 10C. The reference system 180 may include many baseline calculations, images, and/or measurements such as inter-pupillary distance, eye center location, device fit information, eye shape information, visual axis location, and so on. The reference system 180 includes an out-of-box reference gaze angle 182 that is calculated when the viewing device 20 is still new. The out-of-box reference gaze angle 182 is stored in memory. The reference system 180 further has an updated gaze angle 184 stored in memory. The updated gaze angle 184 is calculated on a periodic basis and represents the gaze angle that is most recently calculated. The reference system 180 further includes a change 186 in a gaze angle due to camera deformation. The change 186 is a difference between the updated gaze angle 184 and the out-of-box reference gaze angle 182. The change 186 is represented in FIG. 10A by a sum of the vectors 170. The correction calculation unit 50 functions to calculate the vector 152 in FIG. 10B. Other aspects of the viewing device 20 in FIG. 11 are the same as the viewing device in FIG. 1 and similar reference numerals indicate similar components. While the out-of-box reference gaze angle is described as being a baseline for comparison, any other eye characteristic, measurement, calculation, or image may be used instead of, or in addition to, the out-of-box reference gaze angle.



FIG. 12 illustrates the method as hereinbefore described. At 200, a virtual object is displayed at a select location wherein an eye viewing the virtual object has an expected gaze direction. At 202, an expected gaze vector range is determined based on the select location. At 204, a user interaction event is detected wherein the user interacts with the virtual object. At 206, light reflected from an eye is captured with an eye tracking camera. At 208, an altered gaze vector is calculated based on the light captured by the eye tracking camera. At 210, a comparison is made between the determined altered gaze vector and the expected gaze vector range. Elements 200 to 210 can be grouped into element 212, namely for detecting a deformation of the display assembly, wherein the deformation causes the virtual object to be viewable in an altered location wherein the eye has an altered gaze direction. It may be possible to carry out element 212 without the specific elements listed as elements 200 to 210. Furthermore, although gaze vectors are calculated, it may be possible to determine a gaze direction using a method other than one that requires a calculation of a gaze vector.


At 214, a determination is made whether the actual gaze vector is outside the gaze vector range. If the determination at 214 is negative, the process returns to 200. If the determination at 214 is positive, a virtual content rendering location correction amount and direction amount are calculated. At 220, the virtual content render location is adjusted by the calculated correction amount and direction. Elements 218 and 220 can be grouped into element 222, namely for the display of the virtual object in a corrected location wherein the eye viewing the virtual object in the corrected location has a corrected gaze direction that is moved closer to the expected gaze direction than the altered gaze direction.



FIG. 13 shows a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the exemplary form of a computer system 900 within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, may be executed. In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or may be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. Further, while only a single machine is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also be taken to include any collection of machines that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.


The exemplary computer system 900 includes a processor 902 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU) or both), a main memory 904 (e.g., read only memory (ROM), flash memory, dynamic random access memory (DRAM) such as synchronous DRAM (SDRAM) or Rambus DRAM (RDRAM), etc.), and a static memory 906 (e.g., flash memory, static random access memory (SRAM), etc.), which communicate with each other via a bus 908 and a laser driver chip 12 or other light source driver.


The computer system 900 may further include a disk drive unit 916, and a network interface device 920.


The disk drive unit 916 includes a machine-readable medium 922 on which is stored one or more sets of instructions 924 (e.g., software) embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The software may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 904 and/or within the processor 902 during execution thereof by the computer system 900, the main memory 904 and the processor 902 also constituting machine-readable media.


The software may further be transmitted or received over a network 928 via the network interface device 920.


While the machine-readable medium 922 is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic media, and carrier wave signals.


The laser driver chip 12 includes a data store 161 and its own processor 162. The data store 161 is used to store instruction and data structures that are specific to the operation of a laser source. The processor 162 retrieves the instructions from the data store and has access to the data structures to execute routines that drive the laser source so that the laser source generates laser light. The laser source forms part of a projector that receives data such as video data. A scanner forms part of the projector to allow the projector to display the laser light over a two-dimensional area, and in some instances in three-dimensional space with any patterns, color, saturation and other light qualities that are created by the projector being based on values in the video data.


Although a laser source and a laser driver chip 12 have been illustrated and discussed, it may be possible to use other display systems. Other display systems may for example include displays that make use of light-emitting diode (LED) technology, organic light-emitting diode (OLED) technology, superluminescent light-emitting diode (SLED), or the like.


While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative and not restrictive of the current invention, and that this invention is not restricted to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described since modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art.

Claims
  • 1. A viewing device for displaying rendered content comprising: a display assembly including an optical display configured to display a virtual object in a select location on the display assembly, wherein an eye viewing the virtual object has an expected gaze direction; anda deformation detection system connected to the display assembly and including:an eye tracking camera configured to capture light reflected from the eye; anda gaze angle calculation module configured to detect a measured gaze direction of the eye viewing the virtual object on the display assembly, wherein the deformation detection system includes an attention generation unit configured to alter the display of the virtual object and attract a user's attention to the virtual object before detecting the measured gaze direction, and calculate a deformation of the display assembly based on the measured gaze direction, wherein the measured gaze direction that is calculated by the gaze angle calculation module is an altered gaze direction due to deformation of the eye tracking camera and the optical display, wherein the altered gaze direction due to deformation of the eye tracking camera is represented by a camera deformation vector calculated from a difference of eye center positions with respect to the eye tracking camera between a current eye center position and an initial eye center position when the display assembly is still new, and wherein the altered gaze direction due to deformation of the optical display is calculated by deducting the camera deformation vector from a resultant vector representing the measured gaze direction.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising: a correction system connected to the deformation detection system to display, with the display assembly, the virtual object in a corrected location wherein the measured gaze direction of the eye viewing the virtual object in the corrected location is a corrected gaze direction, wherein a difference between the expected gaze direction and the corrected gaze direction is less than a difference between the expected gaze direction and the altered gaze direction.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the optical display is deformed in a display deformation direction and the altered gaze direction is moved relative to the expected gaze direction in the display deformation direction.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the optical display is transparent and the virtual object is viewable by the eye at a location on a side of the optical display opposing the eye.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein: the difference between the expected gaze direction and the altered gaze direction is in a first direction and the change in the measured gaze direction due to the deformation of the eye tracking camera is in a second direction and the first and second directions are less than 90 degrees relative to one another, further comprising:a correction system connected to the deformation detection system to display, with the display assembly, the virtual object in a corrected location wherein the eye viewing the virtual object in the corrected location has a corrected gaze direction that is moved toward the expected gaze direction from the altered gaze direction.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein: the change from the expected gaze direction to the altered gaze direction is in a first direction and the change in the measured gaze direction due to the deformation of the eye tracking camera is in a second direction and the first and second directions are separated by more than 90 degrees relative to one another.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, further comprising: a correction system connected to the deformation detection system to display, with the display assembly, the virtual object without moving the virtual object from the altered location.
  • 8. The system of claim 6, further comprising: a correction system connected to the deformation detection system to display, with the display assembly, the virtual object in a corrected location wherein the eye viewing the virtual object in the corrected location has a measured gaze direction that is a corrected gaze direction, wherein the corrected gaze direction is moved toward the expected gaze direction from the altered gaze direction.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, further comprising: a reference system to detect a change in the measured gaze direction due to the deformation of the eye tracking camera;a correction calculation unit to determine the change in the measured gaze direction due to the deformation of the display assembly by deducting change in the measured gaze direction due to the deformation of the eye tracking camera from the change in the gaze angle that is detected by the deformation detection system; anda correction system connected to the deformation detection system to display, with the display assembly, the virtual object in a corrected location wherein the eye viewing the virtual object in the corrected location has a corrected gaze direction that is moved in a direction opposite to the change in the gaze angle due to the deformation of the display assembly.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the deformation detection system includes: a statistical system configured to receive and analyze multiple measured gaze direction measurements;a gaze angle calculation unit that calculates multiple gaze directions, each gaze direction for a respective measurement; anda correction calculation unit that determines the altered gaze direction based on the multiple actual gaze direction measurements.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the attention generation unit is configured to attract the user's attention by changing a color of the virtual object.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the attention generation unit is configured to attract the user's attention to the virtual object by reducing a size of the virtual object.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/928,313, filed on Jul. 14, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/355,611, filed on Mar. 15, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,755,676, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/643,672, filed on Mar. 15, 2018, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (496)
Number Name Date Kind
4344092 Miller Aug 1982 A
4652930 Crawford Mar 1987 A
4810080 Grendol et al. Mar 1989 A
4997268 Dauvergne Mar 1991 A
5007727 Kahaney et al. Apr 1991 A
5074295 Willis Dec 1991 A
5240220 Elberbaum Aug 1993 A
5251635 Dumoulin et al. Oct 1993 A
5410763 Bolle May 1995 A
5455625 Englander Oct 1995 A
5495286 Adair Feb 1996 A
5497463 Stein et al. Mar 1996 A
5682255 Friesem et al. Oct 1997 A
5689669 Lynch Nov 1997 A
5826092 Flannery Oct 1998 A
5854872 Tai Dec 1998 A
5864365 Sramek et al. Jan 1999 A
5937202 Crosetto Aug 1999 A
6002853 de Hond Dec 1999 A
6012811 Chao et al. Jan 2000 A
6016160 Coombs et al. Jan 2000 A
6064749 Hirota et al. May 2000 A
6076927 Owens Jun 2000 A
6079982 Meader Jun 2000 A
6117923 Amagai et al. Sep 2000 A
6119147 Toomey et al. Sep 2000 A
6124977 Takahashi Sep 2000 A
6179619 Tanaka Jan 2001 B1
6191809 Hori et al. Feb 2001 B1
6219045 Leahy et al. Apr 2001 B1
6243091 Berstis Jun 2001 B1
6271843 Lection et al. Aug 2001 B1
6362817 Powers et al. Mar 2002 B1
6375369 Schneider et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385735 Wilson May 2002 B1
6396522 Vu May 2002 B1
6414679 Miodonski et al. Jul 2002 B1
6538655 Kubota Mar 2003 B1
6541736 Huang et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570563 Honda May 2003 B1
6573903 Gantt Jun 2003 B2
6590593 Robertson et al. Jul 2003 B1
6621508 Shiraishi et al. Sep 2003 B1
6690393 Heron et al. Feb 2004 B2
6757068 Foxlin Jun 2004 B2
6784901 Harvfey et al. Aug 2004 B1
6961055 Doak Nov 2005 B2
7046515 Wyatt May 2006 B1
7051219 Hwang May 2006 B2
7076674 Cervantes Jul 2006 B2
7111290 Yates, Jr Sep 2006 B1
7119819 Robertson et al. Oct 2006 B1
7219245 Raghuvanshi May 2007 B1
7382288 Wilson Jun 2008 B1
7414629 Santodomingo Aug 2008 B2
7431453 Hogan Oct 2008 B2
7467356 Gettman et al. Dec 2008 B2
7542040 Templeman Jun 2009 B2
7573640 Nivon et al. Aug 2009 B2
7653877 Matsuda Jan 2010 B2
7663625 Chartier et al. Feb 2010 B2
7724980 Shenzhi May 2010 B1
7746343 Charaniya et al. Jun 2010 B1
7751662 Kleemann Jul 2010 B2
7758185 Lewis Jul 2010 B2
7788323 Greenstein et al. Aug 2010 B2
7804507 Yang et al. Sep 2010 B2
7814429 Buffet et al. Oct 2010 B2
7817150 Reichard et al. Oct 2010 B2
7844724 Van Wie et al. Nov 2010 B2
8060759 Arnan et al. Nov 2011 B1
8120851 Iwasa Feb 2012 B2
8214660 Capps, Jr Jul 2012 B2
8246408 Elliot Aug 2012 B2
8353594 Lewis Jan 2013 B2
8360578 Nummela et al. Jan 2013 B2
8508676 Silverstein et al. Aug 2013 B2
8547638 Levola Oct 2013 B2
8605764 Rothaar et al. Oct 2013 B1
8619365 Harris et al. Dec 2013 B2
8696113 Lewis Apr 2014 B2
8698701 Margulis Apr 2014 B2
8733927 Lewis May 2014 B1
8736636 Kang May 2014 B2
8759929 Shiozawa et al. Jun 2014 B2
8793770 Lim Jul 2014 B2
8823855 Hwang Sep 2014 B2
8847988 Geisner et al. Sep 2014 B2
8874673 Kim Oct 2014 B2
9010929 Lewis Apr 2015 B2
9015501 Gee Apr 2015 B2
9086537 Iwasa et al. Jul 2015 B2
9095437 Boyden et al. Aug 2015 B2
9239473 Lewis Jan 2016 B2
9244293 Lewis Jan 2016 B2
9244533 Friend et al. Jan 2016 B2
9383823 Geisner et al. Jul 2016 B2
9489027 Ogletree Nov 2016 B1
9519305 Wolfe Dec 2016 B2
9581820 Robbins Feb 2017 B2
9582060 Balatsos Feb 2017 B2
9658473 Lewis May 2017 B2
9671566 Abovitz et al. Jun 2017 B2
9671615 Vallius et al. Jun 2017 B1
9696795 Marcolina et al. Jul 2017 B2
9798144 Sako et al. Oct 2017 B2
9874664 Stevens et al. Jan 2018 B2
9880441 Osterhout Jan 2018 B1
9918058 Takahasi et al. Mar 2018 B2
9955862 Freeman et al. May 2018 B2
9978118 Ozgumer et al. May 2018 B1
9996797 Holz et al. Jun 2018 B1
10018844 Levola et al. Jul 2018 B2
10082865 Raynal Sep 2018 B1
10151937 Lewis Dec 2018 B2
10185147 Lewis Jan 2019 B2
10218679 Jawahar Feb 2019 B1
10241545 Richards et al. Mar 2019 B1
10317680 Richards et al. Jun 2019 B1
10436594 Belt et al. Oct 2019 B2
10516853 Gibson et al. Dec 2019 B1
10551879 Richards et al. Feb 2020 B1
10578870 Kimmel Mar 2020 B2
10698202 Kimmel et al. Jun 2020 B2
10856107 Mycek et al. Oct 2020 B2
10825424 Zhang Nov 2020 B2
10987176 Poltaretskyi et al. Apr 2021 B2
11190681 Brook et al. Nov 2021 B1
11209656 Choi et al. Dec 2021 B1
11236993 Hall et al. Feb 2022 B1
20010010598 Aritake et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010018667 Kim Aug 2001 A1
20020007463 Fung Jan 2002 A1
20020108064 Nunally Feb 2002 A1
20020063913 Nakamura et al. May 2002 A1
20020071050 Homberg Jun 2002 A1
20020095463 Matsuda Jul 2002 A1
20020113820 Robinson et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020122648 Mule' et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140848 Cooper et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030028816 Bacon Feb 2003 A1
20030048456 Hill Mar 2003 A1
20030067685 Niv Apr 2003 A1
20030077458 Korenaga et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030115494 Cervantes Jun 2003 A1
20030218614 Lavelle et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030219992 Schaper Nov 2003 A1
20030226047 Park Dec 2003 A1
20040001533 Tran et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040021600 Wittenberg Feb 2004 A1
20040025069 Gary et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040042377 Nikoloai et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073822 Greco Apr 2004 A1
20040073825 Itoh Apr 2004 A1
20040111248 Granny et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040113887 Pair et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040174496 Ji et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186902 Stewart Sep 2004 A1
20040193441 Altieri Sep 2004 A1
20040201857 Foxlin Oct 2004 A1
20040238732 State et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040240072 Schindler et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040246391 Travis Dec 2004 A1
20040268159 Aasheim et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050001977 Zelman Jan 2005 A1
20050034002 Flautner Feb 2005 A1
20050093719 Okamoto et al. May 2005 A1
20050128212 Edecker et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050157159 Komiya et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050177385 Hull Aug 2005 A1
20050231599 Yamasaki Oct 2005 A1
20050273792 Inohara et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060013435 Rhoads Jan 2006 A1
20060015821 Jacques Parker et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060019723 Vorenkamp Jan 2006 A1
20060038880 Starkweather et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060050224 Smith Mar 2006 A1
20060090092 Verhulst Apr 2006 A1
20060126181 Levola Jun 2006 A1
20060129852 Bonola Jun 2006 A1
20060132914 Weiss et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060179329 Terechko Aug 2006 A1
20060221448 Nivon et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060228073 Mukawa et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060250322 Hall et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259621 Ranganathan Nov 2006 A1
20060268220 Hogan Nov 2006 A1
20070058248 Nguyen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070103836 Oh May 2007 A1
20070124730 Pytel May 2007 A1
20070159673 Freeman et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070188837 Shimizu et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198886 Saito Aug 2007 A1
20070204672 Huang et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070213952 Cirelli Sep 2007 A1
20070283247 Brenneman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080002259 Ishizawa et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080002260 Arrouy et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080030429 Hailpern Feb 2008 A1
20080043334 Itzkovitch et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046773 Ham Feb 2008 A1
20080063802 Maula et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080068557 Menduni et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080125218 Collins May 2008 A1
20080146942 Dala-Krishna Jun 2008 A1
20080173036 Willaims Jul 2008 A1
20080177506 Kim Jul 2008 A1
20080205838 Crippa et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215907 Wilson Sep 2008 A1
20080225393 Rinko Sep 2008 A1
20080235570 Sawada et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080246693 Hailpern et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080316768 Travis Dec 2008 A1
20090076791 Rhoades et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090091583 McCoy Apr 2009 A1
20090153797 Allon et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090224416 Laakkonen et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090245730 Kleemann Oct 2009 A1
20090287728 Martine et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090300528 Stambaugh Dec 2009 A1
20090310633 Ikegami Dec 2009 A1
20100005326 Archer Jan 2010 A1
20100019962 Fujita Jan 2010 A1
20100056274 Uusitalo et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100063854 Purvis et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070378 Trotman et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100079841 Levola Apr 2010 A1
20100115428 Shuping et al. May 2010 A1
20100153934 Lachner Jun 2010 A1
20100194632 Raento et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100205541 Rappaport et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100214284 Rieffel et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100232016 Landa et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100232031 Batchko et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100244168 Shiozawa et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100274567 Carlson et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274627 Carlson Oct 2010 A1
20100277803 Pockett et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100284085 Laakkonen Nov 2010 A1
20100296163 Sarikko Nov 2010 A1
20110010636 Hamilton, II et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110021263 Anderson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022870 Mcgrane Jan 2011 A1
20110041083 Gabai et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110050640 Lundback et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110050655 Mukawa Mar 2011 A1
20110122240 Becker May 2011 A1
20110145617 Thomson et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110170801 Lu et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110218733 Hamza et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110286735 Temblay Nov 2011 A1
20110291969 Rashid et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120011389 Driesen Jan 2012 A1
20120050535 Densham et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120075501 Oyagi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120081392 Arthur Apr 2012 A1
20120089854 Breakstone Apr 2012 A1
20120113235 Shintani May 2012 A1
20120127062 Bar-Zeev et al. May 2012 A1
20120154557 Perez et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120218301 Miller Aug 2012 A1
20120246506 Knight Sep 2012 A1
20120249416 Maciocci et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120249741 Maciocci et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120260083 Andrews Oct 2012 A1
20120307075 Margalit Dec 2012 A1
20120307362 Silverstein et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120314959 White et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120320460 Levola Dec 2012 A1
20120326948 Crocco et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130021486 Richardon Jan 2013 A1
20130050258 Liu et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130050642 Lewis et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130050833 Lewis et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130051730 Travers et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130061240 Yan et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130077049 Bohn Mar 2013 A1
20130077170 Ukuda Mar 2013 A1
20130094148 Sloane Apr 2013 A1
20130129282 Li May 2013 A1
20130162940 Kurtin et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130169923 Schnoll et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130205126 Kruglick Aug 2013 A1
20130222386 Tannhauser et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130268257 Hu Oct 2013 A1
20130278633 Ahn et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130314789 Saarikko et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130318276 Dalal Nov 2013 A1
20130336138 Venkatraman et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130342564 Kinnebrew et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130342570 Kinnebrew et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130342571 Kinnebrew et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130343408 Cook Dec 2013 A1
20140002329 Nishimaki et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140013098 Yeung Jan 2014 A1
20140016821 Arth et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140022819 Oh et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140078023 Ikeda et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140082526 Park et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140119598 Ramachandran et al. May 2014 A1
20140126769 Reitmayr et al. May 2014 A1
20140140653 Brown et al. May 2014 A1
20140149573 Tofighbakhsh et al. May 2014 A1
20140168260 O'Brien et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140266987 Magyari Sep 2014 A1
20140267419 Ballard et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140274391 Stafford Sep 2014 A1
20140282105 Nordstrom Sep 2014 A1
20140313228 Kasahara Oct 2014 A1
20140340449 Plagemann et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140359589 Kodsky et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140375680 Ackerman et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150005785 Olson Jan 2015 A1
20150009099 Queen Jan 2015 A1
20150077312 Wang Mar 2015 A1
20150097719 Balachandreswaran et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150123966 Newman May 2015 A1
20150130790 Vazquez, II et al. May 2015 A1
20150134995 Park et al. May 2015 A1
20150138248 Schrader May 2015 A1
20150155939 Oshima et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150168221 Mao et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150205126 Schowengerdt Jul 2015 A1
20150235427 Nobori et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150235431 Schowengerdt Aug 2015 A1
20150253651 Russell et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150256484 Cameron Sep 2015 A1
20150269784 Miyawaki et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150294483 Wells et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150301955 Yakovenko et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150310657 Eden Oct 2015 A1
20150338915 Publicover et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150355481 Hilkes et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160004102 Nisper et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160015470 Border Jan 2016 A1
20160027215 Burns et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160033770 Fujimaki et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160077338 Robbins et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160085285 Mangione-Smith Mar 2016 A1
20160085300 Robbins et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160091720 Stafford Mar 2016 A1
20160093099 Bridges Mar 2016 A1
20160093269 Buckley et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160123745 Cotier et al. May 2016 A1
20160139402 Lapstun May 2016 A1
20160155273 Lyren et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160180596 Gonzalez del Rosario Jun 2016 A1
20160187654 Border et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160191887 Casas Jun 2016 A1
20160202496 Billetz et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160217624 Finn et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160266412 Yoshida Sep 2016 A1
20160267708 Nistico et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160274733 Hasegawa et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160287337 Aram et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160300388 Stafford et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160321551 Priness et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160327798 Xiao et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160334279 Mittleman et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160357255 Lindh et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160370404 Quadrat et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160370510 Thomas Dec 2016 A1
20170038607 Camara Feb 2017 A1
20170060225 Zha et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170061696 Li et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170064066 Das et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170100664 Osterhout et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170102544 Vallius et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170115487 Travis Apr 2017 A1
20170122725 Yeoh et al. May 2017 A1
20170123526 Trail May 2017 A1
20170127295 Black et al. May 2017 A1
20170131569 Aschwanden et al. May 2017 A1
20170147066 Katz et al. May 2017 A1
20170160518 Lanman et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170161951 Fix et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170185261 Perez et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170192239 Nakamura et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170201709 Igarashi et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170205903 Miller et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170206668 Poulos et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170213388 Margolis et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170214907 Lapstun Jul 2017 A1
20170219841 Popovich et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170232345 Rofougaran et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170235126 DiDomenico Aug 2017 A1
20170235129 Kamakura Aug 2017 A1
20170235142 Wall et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170235144 Piskunov et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170235147 Kamakura Aug 2017 A1
20170243403 Daniels et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170246070 Osterhout et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170254832 Ho et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170256096 Faaborg et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170258526 Lang Sep 2017 A1
20170266529 Reikmoto Sep 2017 A1
20170270712 Tyson et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170281054 Stever et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170287376 Bakar et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170293141 Schowengerdt et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170307886 Stenberg et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170307891 Bucknor et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170312032 Amanatullah et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170322418 Liu et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170322426 Tervo Nov 2017 A1
20170329137 Tervo Nov 2017 A1
20170332098 Rusanovskyy et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170336636 Amitai et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170357332 Balan et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170363871 Vallius Dec 2017 A1
20170371394 Chan Dec 2017 A1
20170371661 Sparling Dec 2017 A1
20180014266 Chen Jan 2018 A1
20180024289 Fattal Jan 2018 A1
20180044173 Netzer Feb 2018 A1
20180052007 Teskey et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180052501 Jones, Jr. et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180059305 Popovich et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180067779 Pillalamarri et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180070855 Eichler Mar 2018 A1
20180082480 White et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180084245 Lapstun Mar 2018 A1
20180088185 Woods et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180102981 Kurtzman et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180108179 Tomlin et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180114298 Malaika et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180129112 Osterhout May 2018 A1
20180131907 Schmirier et al. May 2018 A1
20180136466 Ko May 2018 A1
20180144691 Choi et al. May 2018 A1
20180150971 Adachi et al. May 2018 A1
20180151796 Akahane May 2018 A1
20180172995 Lee et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180188115 Hsu et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180189568 Powderly Jul 2018 A1
20180190017 Mendez et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180191990 Motoyama et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180218545 Garcia et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180250589 Cossairt et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180284877 Klein Oct 2018 A1
20180292654 Wall et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180299678 Singer et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180357472 Dreessen Dec 2018 A1
20190005069 Filgueiras de Araujo et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190011691 Peyman Jan 2019 A1
20190056591 Tervo et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190087015 Lam et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190101758 Zhu et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190107723 Lee et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190137788 Suen May 2019 A1
20190155034 Singer et al. May 2019 A1
20190155439 Mukherjee et al. May 2019 A1
20190158926 Kang et al. May 2019 A1
20190162950 Lapstun May 2019 A1
20190167095 Krueger Jun 2019 A1
20190172216 Ninan et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190178654 Hare Jun 2019 A1
20190196690 Chong et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190206116 Xu et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190219815 Price et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190243123 Bohn Aug 2019 A1
20190287270 Nakamura et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190318502 He et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190318540 Piemonte et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190321728 Imai et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190347853 Chen et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190380792 Poltaretskyi et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190388182 Kumar et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200066045 Stahl et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200098188 Bar-Zeev et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200100057 Galon et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200110928 Al Jazaery et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200117267 Gibson et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200117270 Gibson et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200184217 Faulkner Jun 2020 A1
20200184653 Faulker Jun 2020 A1
20200202759 Ukai et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200242848 Ambler et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200309944 Thoresen et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200356161 Wagner Nov 2020 A1
20200368616 Delamont Nov 2020 A1
20200391115 Leeper et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200409528 Lee Dec 2020 A1
20210008413 Asikainen et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210033871 Jacoby et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210041951 Gibson et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210053820 Gurin et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210093391 Poltaretskyi et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210093410 Gaborit et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210093414 Moore et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210097886 Kuester et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210132380 Wieczorek May 2021 A1
20210142582 Jones et al. May 2021 A1
20210158627 Cossairt et al. May 2021 A1
20210173480 Osterhout et al. Jun 2021 A1
20220366598 Azimi et al. Nov 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (96)
Number Date Country
101449270 Jun 2009 CN
104040410 Sep 2014 CN
104603675 May 2015 CN
106662754 May 2017 CN
107683497 Feb 2018 CN
105190427 Nov 2019 CN
0504930 Mar 1992 EP
0535402 Apr 1993 EP
0632360 Jan 1995 EP
1215522 Jun 2002 EP
1494110 Jan 2005 EP
1938141 Jul 2008 EP
1943556 Jul 2008 EP
2290428 Mar 2011 EP
2350774 Aug 2011 EP
1237067 Jan 2016 EP
3139245 Mar 2017 EP
3164776 May 2017 EP
3236211 Oct 2017 EP
2723240 Aug 2018 EP
2896986 Feb 2021 EP
2499635 Aug 2013 GB
2542853 Apr 2017 GB
938DEL2004 Jun 2006 IN
H03-036974 Apr 1991 JP
H10-333094 Dec 1998 JP
2002-529806 Sep 2002 JP
2003-029198 Jan 2003 JP
2003-141574 May 2003 JP
2003-228027 Aug 2003 JP
2003-329873 Nov 2003 JP
2005-303843 Oct 2005 JP
2007-012530 Jan 2007 JP
2007-86696 Apr 2007 JP
2007-273733 Oct 2007 JP
2008-257127 Oct 2008 JP
2009-090689 Apr 2009 JP
2009-244869 Oct 2009 JP
2010-014443 Jan 2010 JP
2011-033993 Feb 2011 JP
2011-257203 Dec 2011 JP
2012-015774 Jan 2012 JP
2012-235036 Nov 2012 JP
2013-525872 Jun 2013 JP
2014-500522 Jan 2014 JP
2014-192550 Oct 2014 JP
2015-191032 Nov 2015 JP
2016-502120 Jan 2016 JP
2016-85463 May 2016 JP
2016-516227 Jun 2016 JP
2017-015697 Jan 2017 JP
2017-153498 Sep 2017 JP
2017-531840 Oct 2017 JP
6232763 Nov 2017 JP
6333965 May 2018 JP
2005-0010775 Jan 2005 KR
10-2006-0059992 Jun 2006 KR
10-1372623 Mar 2014 KR
201219829 May 2012 TW
201803289 Jan 2018 TW
1991000565 Jan 1991 WO
2000030368 Jun 2000 WO
2002071315 Sep 2002 WO
2004095248 Nov 2004 WO
2006132614 Dec 2006 WO
2007037089 May 2007 WO
2007085682 Aug 2007 WO
2007102144 Sep 2007 WO
2008148927 Dec 2008 WO
2009101238 Aug 2009 WO
2014203440 Dec 2010 WO
2012030787 Mar 2012 WO
2013049012 Apr 2013 WO
2013062701 May 2013 WO
2014033306 Mar 2014 WO
2015143641 Oct 2015 WO
2015143641 Oct 2015 WO
2016054092 Apr 2016 WO
2017004695 Jan 2017 WO
2017044761 Mar 2017 WO
2017049163 Mar 2017 WO
2017120475 Jul 2017 WO
2017176861 Oct 2017 WO
2017203201 Nov 2017 WO
2018008232 Jan 2018 WO
2018031261 Feb 2018 WO
2018022523 Feb 2018 WO
2018044537 Mar 2018 WO
2018039273 Mar 2018 WO
2018057564 Mar 2018 WO
2018085287 May 2018 WO
2018087408 May 2018 WO
2018097831 May 2018 WO
2018166921 Sep 2018 WO
2019148154 Aug 2019 WO
2020010226 Jan 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (234)
Entry
“Communication according to Rule 164(1) EPC dated Feb. 23, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20753144.3, (11 pages).
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Apr. 25, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 18885707.2, (5 pages).
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jan. 4, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20154070.5, (8 pages).
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated May 30, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19768418.6, (6 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 28, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19815876.8, (9 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 4, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19815085.6, (9 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 19, 2020”, European Patent Application No. 20154750.2, (10 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 22, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19843487.0, (14 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated May 16, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19871001.4, (9 pages.
“Extended European Search Report dated May 30, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20753144.3, (10 pages).
“Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/748,193, (23 pages).
“Final Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/864,721, (36 pages).
“Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/262,991, (18 pages).
“First Examination Report dated May 13, 2022”, Indian Patent Application No. 202047026359, (8 pages).
“First Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2022 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201880079474.6, (11 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/256,961, (65 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,782, (52 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/262,991, (60 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,866, (8 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/257,814, (60 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/870,676, (57 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated May 10, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/140,921, (25 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated May 17, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/748,193, (11 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 14, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20886547.7, (8 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 24, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20846338.0, (13 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 8, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19898874.3, (8 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 8, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20798769.4, (13 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20770244.0, (23 pages).
“Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/098,059, (32 pages).
“First Examination Report dated Jul. 27, 2022”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980036675.2, (5 pages).
“First Examination Report dated Jul. 28, 2022”, Indian Patent Application No. 202047024232, (6 pages).
“First Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2022 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980063642.7, (7 pages).
“FS_XR5G: Permanent document, v0.4.0”, Qualcomm Incorporated, 3GPP TSG-SA 4 Meeting 103 retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Meetings%5F3GP P%5FSYNC/SA4/Docs/S4%2DI90526%2Ezip [retrieved on Apr. 12, 2019], Apr. 12, 2019, (98 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/357,795, (63 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/098,059, (28 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/263,001, (14 pages).
“Notice of Reason for Rejection dated Oct. 28, 2022 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-531452, (3 pages).
“Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2022 with English Translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-533730, (11 pages).
“Second Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2022 with English Translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201880079474.6, (10 pages).
“Second Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2022 with English Translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201880089255.6, (14 pages).
Anonymous , “Koi Pond: Top iPhone App Store Paid App”, https://web.archive.org/web/20080904061233/https://www.iphoneincanada.ca/reviews /koi-pond-top-iphone-app-store-paid-app/—[retrieved on Aug. 9, 2022], (2 pages).
Chittineni, C. , et al., “Single filters for combined image geometric manipulation and enhancement”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 1903, Image and Video Processing, Apr. 8, 1993, San Jose, CA. (Year: 1993), pp. 111-121.
“ARToolKit: Hardware”, https://web.archive.org/web/20051013062315/http://www.hitl.washington.edu:80/artoolkit/documentation/hardware.htm (downloaded Oct. 26, 2020), Oct. 13, 2015, (3 pages).
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Sep. 4, 2019, European Patent Application No. 10793707.0 , (4 pages).
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 21, 2021, European Patent Application No. 16207441.3 , (4 pages).
Communication Pursuant to Rule 164(1) EPC dated Jul. 27, 2021, European Patent Application No. 19833664.6 , (11 pages).
European Search Report dated Oct. 15, 2020, European Patent Application No. 20180623.9 , (10 pages).
Examination Report dated Jun. 19, 2020, European Patent Application No. 20154750.2 , (10 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated May 20, 2020, European Patent Application No. 20154070.5 , (7 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 22, 2021, European Patent Application No. 18890390.0 , (11 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2020, European Patent Application No. 18885707.2 , (7 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 30, 2021, European Patent Application No. 19811971.1 , (9 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 4, 2021, European Patent Application No. 19768418.6 , (9 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 4, 2020, European Patent Application No. 20190980.1 , (14 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 12, 2017, European Patent Application No. 16207441.3 , (8 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 16, 2021, European Patent Application No. 19810142.0 , (14 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 30, 2021, European Patent Application No. 19839970.1 , (7 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 27, 2021, European Patent Application No. 19833664.6 , (10 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 20, 2021, European Patent Application No. 19851373.1 , (8 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 28, 2021, European Patent Application No. 19845418.3 , (13 pages).
Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 16/225,961 , (13 pages).
Final Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2019, U.S. Appl. No. 15/564,517 , (15 pages).
Final Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 15/552,897 , (17 pages).
Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/928,313 , (42 pages).
Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,575 , (29 pages).
Final Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/530,776 , (25 pages).
Final Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 16/435,933 , (44 pages).
Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,782 , (44 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 12, 2021, International Application No. PCT/US20/60555 , (25 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 12, 2020, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/67919 , (14 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 15, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/33987 , (20 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 15, 2020, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/017023 , (13 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/43097 , (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/36275 , (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/43099 , (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 17, 2016, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/FI2016/050172 , (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2021, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US20/60550 , (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 22, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/43751 , (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 23, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/44953 , (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 23, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US18/66514 , (17 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 26, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/40544 , (12 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 27, 2019, International PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/035245 , (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 27, 2019, International Application No. PCT/US19/47746 , (16 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 3, 2020, International Patent Application No. PCT/US20/43596 , (25 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 30, 2019, International Patent Application No. PCT/US19/40324 , (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 4, 2020, International Patent Application No. PCT/US20/31036 , (13 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2020, International Patent Application No. PCT/US20/19871 , (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 8, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/034763 , (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 8, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/41151 , (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 9, 2020, International Application No. PCT/US19/55185 , (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2019, International Patent Application No. PCT/US18/64686 , (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 7, 2020, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/061265 , (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 11, 2019, International PCT Application No. PCT/US19/22620 , (7 pages).
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees mailed Aug. 15, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/36275 , (2 pages).
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees mailed Sep. 24, 2020, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/043596 , (3 pages).
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees mailed on Oct. 22, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/47746 , (2 pages).
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees mailed on Apr. 3, 2020, International Patent Application No. PCT/US20/17023 , (2 pages).
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees mailed on Oct. 17, 2019, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/44953 , (2 pages).
“Multi-core processor”, TechTarget, 2013 , (1 page).
Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 19. 2019, U.S. Appl. No. 16/355,611 , (31 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2019, U.S. Appl. No. 15/564,517 , (14 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/864,721 , (51 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/928,313 , (33 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/225,961 , (15 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 16/435,933 , (16 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 17/002,663 , (43 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/833,093 , (47 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,782 , (40 Pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 16/682,911 , (22 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 16/225,961 , (35 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,588 , (58 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/427,337 , (41 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated May 26, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,575 , (19 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 16/530,776 , (45 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2019, U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,277 , (15 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,575 , (40 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 17/105,848 , (56 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 16/748,193, (62 pages).
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 25, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 15/564,517 , (11 pages).
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 5, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 16/682,911 , (27 pages).
Notice of Reason of Refusal dated Sep. 11, 2020 with English translation, Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-140435 , (6 pages).
“Phototourism Challenge”, CVPR 2019 Image Matching Workshop. https://image matching-workshop. github.io. , (16 pages).
“Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC mailed on Jul. 15, 2019”, European Patent Application No. 15162521.7 , (7 pages).
Aarik, J. , et al. , “Effect of crystal structure on optical properties of TiO2 films grown by atomic Tayer deposition”, Thin Solid Films; Publication [online). May 19, 1998 [retrieved Feb. 19, 2020]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040609097001351 ?via%3Dihub>; DOI: 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00135-1; see entire document , (2 pages).
Altwaijry , et al. , “Learning to Detect and Match Keypoints with Deep Architectures”, Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC), BMVA Press, Sep. 2016, [retrieved on Jan. 8, 2021 (Jan. 8, 2021 )] < URL: http://www.bmva.org/bmvc/2016/papers/paper049/index.html >, en lire document, especially Abstract.
Arandjelović, Relja , et al. , “Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval”, CVPR, 2012 , (8 pages).
AZOM , “Silica—Silicon Dioxide (SiO2)”, AZO Materials; Publication [Online], Dec. 13, 2001 [retrieved Feb. 19, 2020]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?Article1D=1114>.
Azuma, Ronald T. , “A Survey of Augmented Reality”, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 4 (Aug. 1997), 355-385; https://web.archive.org/web/20010604100006/http://www.cs.unc.edu/˜azuma/ARpresence.pdf (downloaded Oct. 26, 2020).
Azuma, Ronald T. , “Predictive Tracking for Augmented Reality”, Department of Computer Science, Chapel Hill NC; TR95-007, Feb. 1995 , 262 pages.
Battaglia, Peter W, et al. , “Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks”, arXiv:1806.01261, Oct. 17, 2018 , pp. 1-40.
Berg, Alexander C , et al. , “Shape matching and object recognition using low distortion correspondences”, In CVPR, 2005 , (8 pages).
Bian, Jiawang , et al. , “GMS: Grid-based motion statistics for fast, ultra-robust feature correspondence.”, In CVPR (Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), 2017 , (10 pages).
Bimber, Oliver , et al. , “Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds”, https://web.media.mit.edu/˜raskar/book/BimberRaskarAugmentedRealityBook.pdf; published by A K Peters/CRC Press (Jul. 31, 2005); eBook (3rd Edition, 2007) , (393 pages).
Brachmann, Eric , et al. , “Neural-Guided RANSAC: Learning Where to Sample Model Hypotheses”, In ICCV (International Conference on Computer Vision ), arXiv:1905.04132v2 [cs.CV] Jul. 31, 2019 , (17 pages).
Butail , et al. , “Putting the fish in the fish tank: Immersive VR for animal behavior experiments”, In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. May 18, 2012 (May 18, 2012) Retrieved on Nov. 14, 2020 (Nov. 14, 2020) from <http:/lcdcl.umd.edu/papers/icra2012.pdf> entire document.
Caetano, Tibério S , et al. , “Learning graph matching”, IEEE TPAMI, 31 (6):1048-1058, 2009.
Cech, Jan , et al. , “Efficient sequential correspondence selection by cosegmentation”, IEEE TPAMI, 32(9):1568-1581, Sep. 2010.
Cuturi, Marco , “Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport”, NIPS, 2013 , (9 pages).
Dai, Angela , et al. , “ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes”, In CVPR, arXiv:1702.04405v2 [cs.CV] Apr. 11, 2017 , (22 pages).
Deng, Haowen , et al. , “PPFnet: Global context aware local features for robust 3d point matching”, In CVPR, arXiv:1802.02669v2 [cs.CV] Mar. 1, 2018 , (12 pages).
Detone, Daniel , et al. , “Deep image homography estimation”, In RSS Work-shop: Limits and Potentials of Deep Learning in Robotics, arXiv:1606.03798v1 [cs.CV] Jun. 13, 2016 , (6 pages).
Detone, Daniel , et al. , “Self-improving visual odometry”, arXiv:1812.03245, Dec. 8, 2018 , (9 pages).
Detone, Daniel , et al. , “SuperPoint: Self-supervised interest point detection and description”, In CVPR Workshop on Deep Learning for Visual SLAM, arXiv:1712.07629v4 [cs.CV] Apr. 19, 2018 , (13 pages).
Dusmanu, Mihai , et al. , “D2-net: A trainable CNN for joint detection and description of local features”, CVPR, arXiv:1905.03561v1 [cs.CV] May 9, 2019 , (16 pages).
Ebel, Patrick , et al. , “Beyond cartesian representations for local descriptors”, ICCV, arXiv:1908.05547v1 [cs.CV] Aug. 15, 2019 , (11 pages).
Fischler, Martin A , et al. , “Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography”, Communications of the ACM, 24(6): 1981 , pp. 381-395.
Gilmer, Justin , et al. , “Neural message passing for quantum chemistry”, In ICML, arXiv:1704.01212v2 [cs.LG] Jun. 12, 2017 , (14 pages).
Giuseppe, Donato , et al. , “Stereoscopic helmet mounted system for real time 3D environment reconstruction and indoor ego—motion estimation”, Proc. SPIE 6955, Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XIII: Design and Applications , 69550P.
Goodfellow , “Titanium Dioxide—Titania (TiO2)”, AZO Materials; Publication [online]. Jan. 11, 2002 [retrieved Feb. 19, 2020]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?Article1D=1179>.
Hartley, Richard , et al. , “Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision”, Cambridge University Press, 2003 , pp. 1-673.
Jacob, Robert J.K. , “Eye Tracking in Advanced Interface Design”, Human-Computer Interaction Lab, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., date unknown. 2003 , pp. 1-50.
Lee , et al. , “Self-Attention Graph Pooling”, Cornell University Library/Computer Science/Machine Learning, Apr. 17, 2019 [retrieved on Jan. 8, 2021 from the Internet< URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.08082 >, entire document.
Lee, Juho , et al. , “Set transformer: A frame-work for attention-based permutation-invariant neural networks”, ICML, arXiv:1810.00825v3 [cs.LG] May 26, 2019 , (17 pages).
Leordeanu, Marius , et al. , “A spectral technique for correspondence problems using pairwise constraints”, Proceedings of (ICCV) International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 1482-1489, Oct. 2005 , (8 pages).
Levola, T. , “Diffractive Optics for Virtual Reality Displays”, Journal of the SID Eurodisplay 14/05, 2005, XP008093627, chapters 2-3, Figures 2 and 10 , pp. 467-475.
Levola, Tapani , “Invited Paper: Novel Diffractive Optical Components for Near to Eye Displays—Nokia Research Center”, SID 2006 DIGEST, 2006 SID International Symposium, Society for Information Display, vol. XXXVII, May 24, 2005, chapters 1-3, figures 1 and 3 , pp. 64-67.
Li, Yujia , et al. , “Graph matching networks for learning the similarity of graph structured objects”, ICML, arXiv:1904.12787v2 [cs.LG] May 12, 2019 , (18 pages).
Li, Zhengqi , et al. , “Megadepth: Learning single-view depth prediction from internet photos”, In CVPR, fromarXiv: 1804.00607v4 [cs.CV] Nov. 28, 2018 , (10 pages).
Libovicky , et al. , “Input Combination Strategies for Multi-Source Transformer Decoder”, Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation (WMT). vol. 1: Research Papers, Belgium, Brussels, Oct. 31-Nov. 1, 2018; retrieved on Jan. 8, 2021 (Jan. 8, 2021 ) from < URL: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-64026 >, entire document.
Loiola, Eliane Maria, et al. , “A survey for the quadratic assignment problem”, European journal of operational research, 176(2): 2007 , pp. 657-690.
Lowe, David G , “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2): 91-110, 2004 , (28 pages).
Luo, Zixin , et al. , “ContextDesc: Local descriptor augmentation with cross-modality context”, CVPR, arXiv:1904.04084v1 [cs.CV] Apr. 8, 2019 , (14 pages).
Memon, F. , et al. , “Synthesis, Characterization and Optical Constants of Silicon Oxycarbide”, EPJ Web of Conferences; Publication [online). Mar. 23, 2017 [retrieved Feb. 19, 2020).<URL: https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2017/08/epjconf_nanop2017 _00002.pdf>; DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201713900002 , (8 pages).
Molchanov, Pavlo , et al. , “Short-range FMCW monopulse radar for hand-gesture sensing”, 2015 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon) (2015) , pp. 1491-1496.
Mrad , et al. , “A framework for System Level Low Power Design Space Exploration”, , (5 pagea).
Munkres, James , “Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems”, Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 5(1): 1957 , pp. 32-38.
Ono, Yuki , et al. , “LF-Net: Learning local features from images”, 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2018), arXiv:1805.09662v2 [cs.CV] Nov. 22, 2018 , (13 pages).
Paszke, Adam , et al. , “Automatic differentiation in Pytorch”, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA , (4 pages).
Peyré, Gabriel , et al. , “Computational Optimal Transport”, Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 11(5-6):355-607, 2019; arXiv:1803.00567v4 [stat.ML] Mar. 18, 2020 , (209 pages).
Qi, Charles Ruizhongtai, et al. , “Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.”, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA. , (10 pages).
Qi, Charles R , et al. , “Pointnet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation”, CVPR, arXiv:1612.00593v2 [cs.CV] Apr. 2, 1001 , (19 pages).
Radenović, Filip , et al. , “Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarking”, CVPR, arXiv:1803.11285v1 [cs.CV] Mar. 29, 2018 , (10 pages).
Raguram, Rahul , et al. , “A comparative analysis of ransac techniques leading to adaptive real-time random sample consensus”, Computer Vision—ECCV 2008, 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, Oct. 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part I , (15 pages).
Ranftl, René , et al. , “Deep fundamental matrix estimation”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018 , (17 pages).
Revaud, Jerome , et al. , “R2D2: Repeatable and Reliable Detector and Descriptor”, In NeurIPS, arXiv:1906.06195v2 [cs.CV] Jun. 17, 2019 , (12 pages).
Rocco, Ignacio , et al. , “Neighbourhood Consensus Networks”, 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2018), Montréal, Canada, arXiv:1810.10510v2 [cs.CV] Nov. 29, 2018 , (20 pages).
Rublee, Ethan , et al. , “ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2564-2571. 2011; 10.1109/ICCV.2011.612654 , (9 pages).
Sarlin , et al. , “SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networks”, Cornell University Library/Computer Science/ Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nov. 26, 2019 [retrieved on Jan. 8, 2021 from the Internet< URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11763 >, entire document.
Sattler, Torsten , et al. , “SCRAMSAC: Improving RANSAC's efficiency with a spatial consistency filter”, ICCV, 2009: 2090-2097. , (8 pages).
Schonberger, Johannes Lutz, et al. , “Pixelwise view selection for un-structured multi-view stereo”, Computer Vision—ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Oct. 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part III, pp. 501-518, 2016.
Schonberger, Johannes Lutz, et al. , “Structure-from-motion revisited”, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 4104-4113 , (11 pages).
Sheng, Liu , et al. , “Time-multiplexed dual-focal plane head-mounted display with a liquid lens”, Optics Letters, Optical Society of Amer I Ca, US, vol. 34, No. 11, Jun. 1, 2009 (Jun. 1, 2009), XP001524475, ISSN: 0146-9592 , pp. 1642-1644.
Sinkhorn, Richard , et al. , “Concerning nonnegative matrices and doubly stochastic matrices.”, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 1967 , pp. 343-348.
Spencer, T. , et al. , “Decomposition of poly(propylene carbonate) with UV sensitive iodonium 11 salts”, Polymer Degradation and Stability; (online], Dec. 24, 2010 (retrieved Feb. 19, 2020]. , (17 pages).
Tanriverdi, Vildan , et al. , “Interacting With Eye Movements in Virtual Environments”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Tufts University; Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 2000 , pp. 1-8.
Thomee, Bart , et al. , “YFCC100m: The new data in multimedia research”, Communications of the ACM, 59(2):64-73, 2016; arXiv:1503.01817v2 [cs.MM] Apr. 25, 2016 , (8 pages).
Torresani, Lorenzo , et al. , “Feature correspondence via graph matching: Models and global optimization”, Computer Vision—ECCV 2008, 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, Oct. 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part II , (15 pages).
Tuytelaars, Tinne , et al. , “Wide baseline stereo matching based on local, affinely invariant regions”, BMVC, 2000 , pp. 1-14.
Ulyanov, Dmitry , et al. , “Instance normalization: The missing ingredient for fast stylization”, arXiv:1607.08022v3 [cs.CV] Nov. 6, 2017 , (6 pages).
Vaswani, Ashish , et al. , “Attention is all you need”, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA; arXiv:1706.03762v5 [cs.CL] Dec. 6, 2017 , (15 pages).
Veli{hacek over (c)}kovi{hacek over (c)}, Petar , et al. , “Graph attention networks”, ICLR, arXiv:1710.10903v3 [stat.ML] Feb. 4, 2018 , (12 pages).
Villani, Cédric , “Optimal transport: old and new”, vol. 338. Springer Science & Business Media, Jun. 2008 , pp. 1-998.
Wang, Xiaolong , et al. , “Non-local neural networks”, CVPR, arXiv: 1711.07971v3 [cs.CV] Apr. 13, 2018 , (10 pages).
Wang, Yue , et al. , “Deep Closest Point: Learning representations for point cloud registration”, ICCV, arXiv:1905.03304v1 [cs.CV] May 8, 2019 , (10 pages).
Wang, Yue , et al. , “Dynamic Graph CNN for learning on point clouds”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, arXiv:1801.07829v2 [cs.CV] Jun. 11, 2019 , (13 pages).
Weissel , et al. , “Process cruise control: event-driven clock scaling for dynamic power management”, Proceedings of the 2002 international conference on Compilers, architecture, and synthesis for embedded systems. Oct. 11, 2002 (Oct. 11, 2002) Retrieved on May 16, 2020 (May 16, 2020) from <URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/581630.581668>.
Yi, Kwang Moo, et al. , “Learning to find good correspondences”, CVPR, arXiv:1711.05971v2 [cs.CV] May 21, 2018 , (13 pages).
Yi, Kwang Moo , et al. , “Lift: Learned invariant feature transform”, ECCV, arXiv:1603.09114v2 [cs.CV] Jul. 29, 2016 , (16 pages).
Zaheer, Manzil , et al. , “Deep Sets”, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA; arXiv:1703.06114v3 [cs.LG] Apr. 14, 2018 , (29 pages).
Zhang, Jiahui , et al. , “Learning two-view correspondences and geometry using order-aware network”, ICCV; aarXiv:1908.04964v1 [cs.CV] Aug. 14, 2019 , (11 pages).
Zhang, Li , et al. , “Dual graph convolutional net-work for semantic segmentation”, BMVC, 2019; arXiv:1909.06121v3 [cs.CV] Aug. 26, 2020 , (18 pages).
“Decision of Rejection dated Jan. 5, 2023 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201880079474.6, (10 pages).
“Final Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/357,795, (15 pages).
“First Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2022 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980061450.2, (11 pages).
“First Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-549034, (7 pages).
“First Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2023 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980082951.9, (5 pages).
“First Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2023 with English translation”, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7019685, (7 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/429,100, (16 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,940, (10 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/046,739, (34 pages).
“First Office Action dated May 20, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-519873, (8 pages).
“First Office Action dated May 26, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-500607, (6 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/516,483, (10 pages).
“Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 5, 2023”, European Patent Application No. 20888716.6, (11 pages).
“First Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-509779, (26 pages).
“First Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2023 with English Translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-567766, (7 pages).
“First Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-566617, (6 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/098,043, (7 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated May 11, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/822,279, (24 pages).
“Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-533730, (13 pages).
“Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-566620, (10 pages).
“Second Office Action dated May 2, 2023 with English Translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-549034, (6 pages).
Li, Yujia , et al., “Graph Matching Networks for Learning the Similarity of Graph Structured Objects”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, XP081268608, Apr. 29, 2019.
Luo, Zixin , et al., “ContextDesc: Local Descriptor Augmentation With Cross-Modality Context”, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, XP033686823, DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00263 [retrieved on Jan. 8, 2020], Jun. 15, 2019, pp. 2522-2531.
Zhang, Zen , et al., “Deep Graphical Feature Learning for the Feature Matching Problem”, 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), IEEE, XP033723985, DOI: 10.1109/ ICCV.2019.00519 [retrieved on Feb. 24, 2020], Oct. 27, 2019, pp. 5086-5095.
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated May 23, 2023”, European Patent Application No. 18890390.0, (5 pages).
“First Examination Report dated Aug. 8, 2023”, Australian Patent Application No. 2018379105, (3 pages).
“First Office Action dated Jul. 4, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-505669, (6 pages).
“First Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-567853, (7 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/807,600, (25 pages).
“Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/650,188, (11 pages).
“Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 27, 2023 with English translation”, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7019685, (4 pages).
“Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-505884, (6 pages).
“Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-503762, (6 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220028358 A1 Jan 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62643672 Mar 2018 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16928313 Jul 2020 US
Child 17497965 US
Parent 16355611 Mar 2019 US
Child 16928313 US