High-definition content providers may include terrestrial broadcasters, satellite broadcasters, cable broadcasters, digital video discs, and others. Providers of high-definition content may market the same to consumers as a premium service, and thus may be concerned about unauthorized use or usage. At the same time, however, the provider may be interested in providing consumers the option of accessing particular high-definition content in a reduced resolution format, in the interest of providing the best possible service to the consumer(s). It may therefore be beneficial to provide a mechanism that allows high-definition providers to protect premium services, while concurrently ensuring that consumer satisfaction is maintained.
This Summary does not in any way limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In one aspect, a method for generating domain-compliant image data is disclosed. The method may include evaluating, by a computing system, domain-specific usage rights that are associated with the transfer of particular encoded image data to a particular computing system other than the computing system, wherein the domain-specific usage rights specify maximum allowable spatial frequency content of the particular encoded image data. The method may further include generating, by the computing system and based on the evaluating, domain-compliant image data by removing particular disallowable spatial frequency content from the encoded image data prior to transfer to the particular computing system.
In another aspect, a computer-implemented method is disclosed that may include receiving, by a computing system, a data stream of encoded packetized content. The method may further include identifying, by the computing system, a particular encoded packet of the data stream as having video content that requires electronic scrambling prior to export from the computing system to a different computing system. The method may still further include determining, by the computing system, a particular threshold value that defines allowable spatial frequencies of video content within the particular encoded packet, the threshold associated with the export of packetized content from the computing system to the different computing system. The method may still further include modifying, by the computing system, discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients of the particular encoded packet that exhibit a matrix column or row index value greater than the particular threshold value to zero magnitude, without completely decoding the particular encoded packet.
In another aspect, a set-top-box is disclosed. The set-top-box may include a first module configured to receive at least one video packet, and extract direct cosine transform (DCT) coefficients within the at least one video packet without fully decoding the at least one video packet. The set-top-box may further include a second module configured to modify particular DCT coefficients of the at least one video packet that exhibit a matrix column or row index value greater than a threshold value to zero magnitude, wherein the threshold value defines allowable spatial frequencies of video content within the at least one video packet and is associated with the export of packetized content from the set-top-box to a different computing system. The set-top-box may still further include a third module configured to generate a particular video packet, the video packet comprising particular DCT coefficients modified by the second module and including DCT coefficients of finite magnitude associated with allowable spatial frequency content, and DCT coefficients of zero magnitude associated with disallowable spatial frequency content.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of various embodiments may be realized by reference to the following figures. In the appended figures, similar components or features may have the same reference label. Further, various components of the same type may be distinguished by following the reference label by a dash and a second label that distinguishes among the similar components. When only the first reference label is used in the specification, the description is applicable to any one of the similar components having the same first reference label irrespective of the second reference label.
The present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for transforming live or recorded HD (High-Definition) content into reduced resolution content based on domain-specific usage rights. In one aspect, the term “resolution” may refer to a greatest spatial frequency that is resolvable within particular content (e.g., an image), as opposed to pixel count. The reduced resolution content may subsequently be transferred between particular computing systems or devices without violating the usage rights. Although described in the context of a satellite-based content distribution system, the various aspects of the present disclosure may generally be applicable to any scenario in which it is desirable to maximize the allocation of computing system or device resources, and/or dynamically tailor particular electronic content to comply with one or more prevailing standards, laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines. For example, and referring now to
The example method 100 includes receiving (module 102), by a computing system, encoded and/or electronically scrambled HD content from a particular HD content provider. For example, the computing system may receive an encoded bitstream, program stream, transport stream, or other type of data stream, from a particular satellite broadcaster that at least provides HD content. For example, HD video content may be at least packetized (e.g., in accordance with the MPEG-2 TS standard) and encoded (e.g., in accordance with one of the MPEG-2 ASP, MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, VC-1 standards) within a transport stream in accordance with a particular standard. In this example, particular data packets within the transport steam comprising HD video content may be uniquely identified by a particular video PID (Packet Identifier). In this manner, the computing system may resolve and aggregate many related data packets for the purpose of reconstructing particular HD content, such as a television program and the like. An example of such a scenario is described in further detail below in connection with
The method 100 further includes determining (module 104), by the computing system, whether the received HD content (see module 102) has sufficient permission(s) to be directly (e.g., without modification) exported to another particular computing system or device in HD format, or whether the received HD content is restricted under some type or form of “access control” in which, for example, image resolution reduction of the HD content should be, or is required to be, performed prior to being exported to another particular computing device. Such “access control” may be performed to ensure that particular access or usage rights are adequately or properly observed. For example, in the scenario of a previously recoded electronically scrambled copy of HD content, a particular parameterwithin the HD content, data packet(s) associated with the HD content, and may be private and/or proprietary, may indicate that only a single electronically scrambled copy of the HD content may exist. An example of such a parameter includes the “FTA_content_management_descriptor” as set forth within the Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Specification for Service Information (SI) in DVB System (ETSI EN 300 468 V1.9.1 2009-03) specification. In this example, and when it desired to create another copy of HD content possibly for export to a particular computing device, a determination may be made that image resolution reduction should be performed on associated HD video content to ensure that certain usage rights are heeded or followed. For example, certain usage rights may require that the HD video content be “down-converted” into SD video content as a copy of the HD content is made. Since the SD video content is no longer HD by form and definition, the SD video content may in certain instances be directly exported to another particular computing system without consideration of prevailing usage rights. In this manner, a provider of the HD content may be afforded a mechanism to protect the HD content, while at the same time a consumer may be provided the option to access HD content in a reduced resolution format. Such an implementation is beneficial in many respects. For example, the consumer would not be required to purchase, download, stream, record, or store two distinct copies of particular content.
In yet another example, a particular parameter within the received HD content may indicate that the HD content, or data packet(s) associated with the HD content, must in all circumstances be fully electronically scrambled in which the same is to be exported to another particular computing system or device in HD format. For example, in a first scenario a particular parameter within the HD content may require that export of the HD content for displays (e.g., for television display) conform(s) to the HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface) with HDCP (High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection). In a second scenario, a particular parameter within data packet(s) associated with the HD content may require that export of the HD content for streaming files (e.g., for streaming HD content to a laptop over a home network) conform(s) to the DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance) with DTCP-IP (Digital Transmission Copy Protection over Internet Protocol) standard. In these two example scenarios, however, the particular computing system or device may not be adequately configured to support data transfer in accordance with the HDMI/HDCP and/or DLNA/DTCP-IP standards. Thus, similar to the scenario of previously recoded copy of HD content as described above, a determination may be made that image resolution reduction (e.g., down-conversion to SD video content) should be, or is required to be, performed on respective HD video content to ensure that particular usage rights are observed.
Operational flow within the method 100 terminates (module 110, described further below) when it is determined (see module 104) that received HD content does in fact have sufficient permission(s) to be directly exported to another particular computing system or device in HD format. Otherwise, the method 100 further includes evaluating (module 106), by the computing system, domain-specific usage rights associated with the received HD content. The domain-specific usage rights may be evaluated at least for the purpose of identifying a maximum allowable spatial frequency content that a modified, or down-converted, version of particular HD content is permitted to exhibit or contain when exported to a particular computing device. In general, usage rights may be “domain-specific” because the usage rights may, in one embodiment, vary based on type and configuration of a particular content provider (e.g., cable broadcasters, DVDs, etc.) and/or type of prevailing standard (e.g., national standard, international standard, proprietary standard, etc.) possibly in combination with one or more prevailing laws, rules, regulations, and/or guidelines. In this manner, the maximum allowable spatial frequency content may be quantified as a function of one or both of a source of corresponding HD content, and a prevailing control otherwise enforced for the purpose of protecting the HD-content content from unauthorized use or usage. Further, in the present example, a particular standard, law, rule, regulation, and/or guideline may be “prevailing” based on any number of factors such, for example, territory in which export of particular HD content is expected to occur, current state of one or controlling authorities, and other factors as well. Particular usage rights may specifically refer to a domestic video format. For example, in the United Kingdom, a limit may correspond to D1 “PAL”=720×576 pixels; in the United States, a limit may correspond to D1 “NTSC”=720×480 pixels or square-pixel “NTSC”=640×480. Other limits include 520,000 pixels per frame, and 320,000 pixels per frame, and 350,000 pixels per frame. Allowable spatial frequencies may be calculated directly from such pixel resolutions. For example, a 480-line video may not store more than 240 cycles per picture height.
While many usage rights may be written in terms of pixel count, usage rights may also state that, having reduced a particular image to that pixel count, the image may then be upscaled to another pixel count when desired. For example, 1920×1080 content may be reduced to 720×480 content, and then upscale back to 1920×1080 content. In this example, the original 1920×1080 content may be considered HD, the 720×480 content may be considered SD, and the upscaled 1920×1080 content, while having the pixel count of HD, may appear as “blurry” as the SD content, or “SD-like.” Thus, the SD-like version may be created by “filtering” the original HD content, without requiring downscale to the 720×480 content. In accordance with the present disclosure, this may wholly be performed within, for example, with a DCT (Direct Cosine Transform) domain, as described in further detail below.
The method 100 further includes generating (module 108), by the computing system, domain-compliant content by removing disallowable spatial frequency content from received HD content (see module 102). In the present example, this is performed in view of particular domain-specific usage rights information (see module 106). Such an operation may correspond to down-converting HD video content into SD video content, or “SD-like” video content. In general, “SD-like” may refer to HD pixel-count content that appears as if it has been upscaled from SD (i.e., particular HD content may appear as “blurry” as SD), and in the present example, SD video content may be “SD-like” because the definition of SD video content may be a variable function of “domain-specific” usage rights, described further below. Further, in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure, the down-converting of HD video content into SD or SD-like video content is performed directly on encoded HD video content. More specifically, domain-compliant content may be generated without “fully” or “completely” decoding the HD content (i.e., “directly”). For example, and assuming for the sake of discussion that particular HD video content is encoded in accordance with the MPEG-2 standard (the following example embodiment may be applicable to any number of image encoding/compression techniques or standards), a particular encoded HD video data packet may be “deconstructed” or otherwise “unpacked” or “disassembled” to the extent that all DCT (Direct Cosine Transform) coefficients are accessible. In the example embodiment, other elements of the HD video data packet (e.g., motion vectors, etc.) may be considered ancillary for the intended purpose, and thus need not be considered, decoded, operated on, deconstructed, unpacked, disassembled, etc.
In the context of images, and as described in further detail below in connection with
Such an implementation as discussed in reference to
Further scenarios and beneficial aspects associated with transforming live or recorded HD content into reduced resolution content based on domain-specific usage rights are described below in connection with
Referring now to
In the present example, the system 200 includes a service provider 202, a satellite uplink 204, a plurality of orbiting (e.g., geosynchronous) satellites 206a-b (collectively, “satellites 206”), a satellite dish 208, a STB (Set-Top Box) 210, a television 212, and a laptop 214. The system 200 also includes an example network 216 that establishes a bi-directional communication path for data transfer between the STB 210 and the laptop 214. In general, the network 216 may incorporate or exhibit terrestrial and/or non-terrestrial network features or elements. For example, in one embodiment the network 216 may be any of a number of wireless or hardwired packet-based communication networks such as, for example, WAN (Wide Area Network), WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network), Internet, or other types of communication networks such that data may be transferred among respective elements of the example system 200. Other embodiments are possible.
In practice, the satellites 206 may be configured to receive uplink signals, such as uplink signals 218a-b, from the satellite uplink 204. In this example, the uplink signals 218a-b may contain one or more transponder streams of particular data or content (e.g., a particular television channel) that is supplied by the service provider 202. For example, each of the respective uplink signals 218a-b may contain various encoded HD television channels, various SD television channels, on-demand programming, programming information, and/or any other content in the form of at least one transponder stream and in accordance with an allotted carrier frequency and bandwidth. In this example, different television channels may be carried using different ones of the satellites 206. Different television channels may also be carried using different transponders of a particular satellite (e.g., satellite 206a); thus, such television channels may be transmitted at different frequencies and/or different frequency ranges. For example, a first and second television channel may be carried on a first carrier frequency over a first transponder of satellite 206a, and a third, fourth, and fifth television channel may be carried on second carrier frequency over a first transponder of satellite 206b, or, the third, fourth, and fifth television channel may be carried on a second carrier frequency over a second transponder of satellite 206a.
The satellites 206 may further be configured to relay the uplink signals 218a-b to the satellite dish 208 as downlink signals, such as downlink signals 220a-b. Similar to the uplink signals 218a-b, each of the downlink signals 220a-b may contain one or more transponder streams of particular data or content, such as various encoded and/or electronically scrambled television channels, on-demand programming, etc., in accordance with an allotted carrier frequency and bandwidth. The downlink signals 220a-b, however, may not necessarily contain the same content as a corresponding one of the uplink signals 218a-b. For example, the uplink signal 218a may include a first transponder stream containing at least a first group of television channels, and the downlink signal 220a may include a second transponder stream containing at least a second, different group of television channels. In other examples, the first and second group of television channels may have one or more television channels in common. In sum, there may be varying degrees of correlation between the uplink signals 218a-b and the downlink signals 220a-b, both in terms of content and underlying characteristics.
Continuing with the above simplified example, the satellite dish 208 may be provided for use (e.g., on a subscription basis) to receive television channels provided by the service provider 202, satellite uplink 204, and/or satellites 206. For example, the satellite dish 208 may be configured to receive particular transponder streams, or downlink signals (e.g., downlink signals 220a-b), from the satellites 206. Additionally, the STB 210, which is communicatively coupled to the satellite dish 208, may subsequently select via tuner, for example, and relay particular transponder streams to one or both of the television 212 and the laptop 214, for display thereon. For example, the satellite dish 208 and the STB 210 may, respectively, be configured to receive and relay at least one premium HD-formatted television channel to the television 212. In this example, the premium HD channel may be output to the television 212 from the STB 210 in accordance with the HDMI/HDCP content protection technologies. In another example, the satellite dish 208 and the STB 210 may, respectively, be configured to receive and relay the premium HD channel to the laptop 214. In this example, the premium HD channel may be output to the laptop 214 from the STB 210 in accordance with the DLNA/DTCP-IP content protection technologies. Other embodiments are possible.
In both of the above HDMI/HDCP and DLNA/DTCP-IP examples, usage rights associated with the viewing of the premium HD-formatted television channel may be adequately preserved or otherwise observed. In general, this is because, in both scenarios, the output of the premium HD-formatted television channel from the STB 210 is electronically scrambled in accordance with a particular standard, in an effort to protect the premium content from unauthorized use or usage. In many instances, however, one or both of the television 212 and the laptop 214 may not be adequately configured to prevent unauthorized access to the premium HD-formatted television channel. For example, the laptop 214 may not be configured to support any type of electronically scrambled information, much less the DLNA/DTCP-IP content protection technologies. In such a scenario, and in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure, a compliance engine 222 may be configured to reduce at least the video resolution of the premium HD-formatted television channel so that content associated with the premium HD-formatted television channel may be transferred to the laptop 214 without violating particular usage rights.
For example, referring now additionally to
In the present example, the compliance engine 222 may include a packet disassemble module 226, a usage rights module 228, a filter module 230, and a packet reassemble module 232. In some implementations, some of these features may be provided as part of an existing Conditional Access System. In the present example, the communication interface 224 of the STB 210 may be configured to enable the transfer of data or information with and between compatibly configured devices via multiple different communication channels, and types of communication channels, some of which may be implementation specific. For example, and referring intermittently to
In practice, the packet disassemble module 226 may receive a HD video packet 234. In one embodiment, the HD video packet 234 may have originated from a particular satellite broadcaster, where the HD video packet 234 may have been at least packetized and encoded within a transport stream in accordance with a particular encoding and data compression standard (e.g., MPEG, SMPTE 421M, etc.). Upon receipt of the HD video packet 234, the packet disassemble module 226 may “unpack” the HD video packet 234, and recover all DCT coefficients within the HD video packet 234, along with a particular parameter (e.g., “FTA_content_management_descriptor”) that may be used identify domain-specific usage rights associated with the received HD video packet 234. For example, the particular parameter may be passed to the usage rights module 228 which may select, from a list for example, an associated threshold value that defines a SD resolution limit which quantifies a maximum allowable spatial frequency content that a modified, or down-converted, version of the HD video packet 234 is permitted to exhibit or contain when exported to a particular computing device.
Upon identification thereof by the usage rights module 228, the SD resolution limit or threshold may be passed to the filter module 230. In addition, the DCT coefficients as recovered by the packet disassemble module 226 from the HD video packet 234 may be passed to the filter module 230. Upon receipt of the SD resolution threshold and respective DCT coefficients, the filter module 230 may apply a filtering operation that at least modifies all DCT coefficients that represent disallowable spatial frequency content within a particular domain associated with the SD resolution threshold. For example, the filter module 230 may implement a stop-band filter to quantize to zero (0) magnitude all DCT coefficients having a basis function that represents a spatial frequency greater than the SD resolution threshold. In addition, and as described in further detail below, the filter module 230 may implement one or both of a pass-band filter and a transition-band filter such that when converted to the spatial domain, an image associated with DCT coefficients as modified by the filter module 230 may appear to have “softened edges,” as opposed to having edges displaying perceivable “ringing artifacts” that may manifest as a ghosting pattern and the like.
Upon respective filtering by the filter module 230, all “filtered” DCT coefficients, either modified or non-modified, may be passed to the packet reassemble module 232. Upon receipt of the filtered DCT coefficients the packet reassemble module 232 may “repack” the filtered DCT coefficients into the HD video packet 234 to form a SD video packet 236. In this manner, the HD video packet 234 is down-converted to a reduced resolution. For example, at least all DCT coefficients having a basis function that represents a spatial frequency greater than the above-mentioned SD resolution threshold may be replaced or quantized to zero (0) magnitude. Both the HD video packet 234 and the SD video packet 236 though describe a video signal with the same number of pixels. For example, both the HD video packet 234 and the SD video packet 236 may have a pixel count of 1920×1080 pixels. Spatial frequencies (e.g., equivalent to perceptible and measurable actual resolution) above the SD resolution threshold have been removed. Additionally, as described in further detail below, all DCT coefficients having a basis function that represents a spatial frequency less than the SD resolution threshold, but relatively close in energy to the SD resolution threshold, may be replaced or quantized to a magnitude less than a magnitude of a corresponding original DCT coefficient. Such an implementation is beneficial in many respects including at least softening “ringing artifacts” in the spatial domain as mentioned above.
Upon forming or generation thereof by the packet reassemble module 232 the SD video packet 236 may be passed to the communication interface 224. In this example, the SD video packet 236 may be exported according to any of a number of supported communication channels. For example, the SD video packet 236 may be exported to the laptop 214 via network 216, as described above. In another example, the SD video packet 236 may be exported to a USB device via a USB port. In both examples, since the SD video packet 236 no longer includes HD spatial frequencies, the SD video packet 236 may be directly exported to the laptop 214 over the network 216, for example, without consideration of prevailing domain-specific usage rights.
As mentioned above in connection with
Still referring to
By similar logic, a pass-band threshold 412 of the DCT coefficient matrix 404 may define a maximum allowable spatial frequency content that a non-modified, or non-converted, version of HD content is permitted to exhibit or contain when exported to a particular computing device. In other words, such spatial frequency content may correspond to typical SD content. In this example, all DCT coefficients having either a row or column index value less than or equal to four (4) are identified as having spatial frequency content that may remain in unmodified form. For example, block (1,4) and block (4,1) are identified as having such allowable spatial frequency content. Mapping the pass-band threshold 412 to the weighting matrix 402, it is shown that all blocks having either a row or column index value less than or equal to four (4) are populated with integer value one (1). Element-by-element matrix multiplication of the DCT coefficient matrix 404 by the weighting matrix 402 may thus map all DCT coefficients having either a row or column index value less than or equal to four (4) as an unchanged value, as shown by the modified matrix 406 where, for simplicity, it is assumed in this example that all DCT coefficients are originally quantized to two (2). The corresponding section of the modified matrix 406 may be referred to as a pass-band 414, and a filter operation associated with the pass-band 414 may be referred to as a pass-band filter.
In some embodiments, the pass-band threshold 412 of the DCT coefficient matrix 404 may approach the SD resolution threshold 408. For example, the pass-band threshold 412 and the SD resolution threshold 408 may correspond to a similar value and thus be coincident. Continuing with the above-example, matrix operation of the DCT coefficient matrix 404 by the weighting matrix 402 may still quantize all DCT coefficients having either a row or column index value greater than or equal to seven (7) to zero (0) magnitude. However, element-by-element matrix multiplication of the DCT coefficient matrix 404 by the weighting matrix 402 may quantize or map all DCT coefficients having either a row or column index value less than seven (7) to their original unchanged values (not shown). An equivalent operation may be to copy or retain the wanted coefficients and delete or “zero” unwanted coefficients. Such a filtering operation may be referred to as a brick-wall filter. In general, a brick-wall filter operation may introduce perceivably undesirable artifacts when observed in the spatial domain. For example, a “ringing artifact” may be observed in the spatial domain (i.e., when viewing a particular image associated with the DCT coefficient matrix 404) that when viewed closely may appear as amorphous, ghost-like images near lines within the particular image (e.g., a blade of grass) that would otherwise appear sharply defined in HD. To address such undesirable effects, the pass-band threshold 412 may be defined to differ from the SD resolution threshold 408, such as shown in
For example, as shown in
Referring now to
At operation 502, encoded HD content is received from a particular HD content provider. For example, the STB 210 may receive an encoded transport stream from a particular satellite broadcaster that at least provides HD content. The HD video content may be packetized, and encoded within the transport stream in accordance with a particular MPEG standard. Other embodiments are possible.
At operation 504, an evaluation may be made to determine whether the received HD content is associated with interlaced video. In the context of interlaced video, a particular video frame does not consist of a single picture. Rather the particular video frame may consist of two separate pictures woven together into a single frame. The two separate pictures may be referred to as “fields.” In general, two associated fields may represent an image at slightly different moments in time, the first field for example being captured and displayed about 20 milliseconds or about 17 milliseconds before the second field. Accordingly, while there may be 25 frames per second or about 30 frames per second, there may be 50 fields per second or about 60 fields per second. Additionally, information in the first field may correspond to lines 1, 3, 5, 7, etc., of the single frame, while information in the second field may correspond to lines 2, 4, 6, 8, etc., of the single frame in accordance with a manner by which the respective fields are captured (i.e., skipping every other line from a video sensor), and also how fields may be displayed on conventional CRT-based televisions.
Modern displays are mostly “progressive” displays, and may de-interlace any interlaced video signal to generate a full 50 or approximately 60 frames per second to send to a display for example. These displays may accomplish this by calculating or predicting “missing” lines from each field. In general, when there is little or no spatial movement, an interlaced frame of a video may look very much like a progressive frame of video, and may be MPEG encoded as a progressive frame. When there is some movement, a particular frame may be split two separate fields, which then may be encoded separately. In other examples, an encoder may recognize movement, and adjust some encoding parameters to optimize encoding of the full frame with the knowledge that the full frame is actually two separate fields, without fully separating the fields themselves. Additionally, some encoders may retain some “field-like” coding when encoding motionless interlaced pictures, and some encoders may retain some “frame-like” coding when encoding moving interlaced pictures. In still further examples, some encoders may use an entirely incorrect mode for encoding interlaced pictures. In sum, there may be substantial variability when encountering interlaced video.
When an evaluation at operation 504 is in the negative, process flow may proceed to operation 506. When an evaluation at operation 504 is in the affirmative, process flow may proceed to operation 508. Here, in the context of interlaced video, operation 508 may address the above-mentioned variability (e.g., incorrect encoding) by, for example, only filtering horizontal resolution (e.g., via filter module 230) of particular encoded content. This may for example be implemented by determining that the particular content is associated with video interlacing, and implementing a DCT filter operation to modify each DCT coefficient associated with horizontal image resolution. For example, this may correspond to only filtering DCT coefficients that occur within column one (1) of the DCT coefficient matrix 404. In this example, a typical resolution restriction that may be required to be met may specify 520,000 total pixels or less. An assumption may be made that this may be the equivalent of 940 pixels×540 pixels=507,600 pixels, or 720 pixels×576 pixels=414,720 pixels. However, it may be equally acceptable to output an equivalent of 480 pixels×1080 pixels=518,400 pixels to meet the resolution requirement. In this example, the interlacing may remain intact, at the expense of more radically reducing horizontal resolution. Other embodiments are possible.
For example, in the DCT domain as described throughout, when video is encoded as fields, reducing the resolution of an interlaced video may be accomplished by separating the video into separate fields and performing a “blurring” operation on the fields. In other words, applying DCT-coefficient zeroing, removal, or scaling as described above, to DCT coefficients for each particular field. When video is encoded as fields when there is movement, and frames when there is none, then applying DCT-coefficient processing to whatever DCT coefficients are stored, trusting that the original encoder has made an appropriate field/frame choice, may yield a video where the picture is more “blurry” during movement than when at rest, but this may be subjectively acceptable. When video contains sequences with “wrong” encoding, and fields are encoded as frames, then vertical “blurring” may blur the two fields, which represent two different moments in time, together. This may create quite an objectionable motion blur, ghosting, and stuttering of movement, and ideally should be avoided. To address such issues, however, an adaptive solution may be performed by understanding the nature of the movement and encoding of the interlaced video, and then filtering DCT coefficients based on the result of this analysis. Still other embodiments are possible.
At operation 506, an evaluation may be made to determine whether to implement a “de-blocking” algorithm. In example embodiments described throughout, by processing 8×8 DCT squares individually without concern for contents of adjacent squares, visible blocking may be introduced where the edges of the DCT blocks no longer share similar pixel values. This may be prevalent where diagonal image components cut across the corners of DCT blocks, appearing as high frequency “dots” at the corner of one DCT block, such dots being removed by the processing. In more advanced codecs, it may be sufficient to trigger a deblocking filter built into the decoder to hide this blocking. For example, in MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, the SEI (Supplemental Enhancement Information) “Deblocking filter display preference” metadata in the stream may be set to cause decoders to apply maximum deblocking (since there are no longer any genuine high frequency components for overaggressive deblocking to damage). In many instances, the blocking may appear at locations where codecs generate similar blocking when being used at too-low a bit-rate for given content, and as such, many devices (e.g., televisions) may already have algorithms built into them to detect such blocking, and filter it out automatically—because it is already present in many broadcasts, and broadcasters decrease the bitrate in order to fit more TV channels into a given delivery platform. As such, on many devices, the blocking, even if left uncorrected by the decoder, may be invisible.
Some devices with limited processing power may skip even “mandatory” deblocking in the decoder, and do not apply a deblocking filter for display. Some users disable deblocking filters. When targeting such devices/users, it may be necessary to adjust processing to reduce the visibility of the blocks, for example analyzing the contents of the blocks, and specifically the edges, and maintaining any high frequency DCT coefficients required to prevent the “blockiness” from occurring, while still removing others to reduce the resolution. This is an adaptive, content-based process that may be implemented in accordance with the present disclosure, while still achieving computational savings such as described above. For efficiency, it may be necessary to restrict such processing to the macroblock level (e.g., 16×16 pixels).
When an evaluation at operation 506 is in the negative, process flow may proceed to operation 510. When an evaluation at operation 506 is in the affirmative, process flow may proceed to operation 512. Here, in the context of blocking/de-blocking, operation 512 may for example, implement a “de-blocking” processes by analyzing DCT blocks (e.g., via filter module 230), specifically edges, and maintaining any high frequency DCT coefficients required to prevent “blockiness” from occurring within the spatial domain, while still removing other DCT coefficients to comply with image resolution reduction requirements as described throughout. Accordingly, a process may be implemented at operation 512 to prevent appearance of block-like artifacts within an image associated with the particular DCT coefficients (e.g., 8×8 DCT blocks). Other embodiments are possible.
At operation 510, an evaluation may be made to determine whether to add “low” levels of artificial noise or “grain” that may enhance the appearance of low resolution images and videos, giving a false subjective impression of higher resolution. In the DCT domain, having removed or attenuated high frequency components that are actually present (e.g., to meet usage rights restrictions), it may be desirable to add-in simulated high frequency components that may provide a false subjective impression of fine detail(s) that may otherwise be present in HD. In some instances, various usage rights may state that, following resolution reduction to meet image constraint criteria as described throughout, it is acceptable to further process the image, including sharpening. Adding low level noise such that it is not obviously perceived as noise, but judged to be detail, may thus be an acceptable method of making an image more aesthetically pleasing.
When an evaluation at operation 510 is in the negative, process flow may proceed to operation 514. When an evaluation at operation 510 is in the affirmative, process flow may proceed to operation 516. Here, in the context of injecting noise to simulate high frequency content, operation 516 may address this by setting higher frequency DCT coefficients to random, but relatively “low” magnitude values. In practice, values that are between 20 dB (decibels) and 40 dB below equivalent of peak luminance level may be used, for example, with individual coefficients being chosen to, on their own, represent values towards a lower end of the range (e.g. −30 dB to −40 dB), but such that when all such DCT coefficients are taken together and transformed via an IDCT (Inverse Discrete Cosine Transform), a result noise level may reach an upper end of the range (e.g. −30 dB to −20 dB). Further, exact amplitudes, frequencies, and random distribution of values may be adjusted based on what may potentially be subjectively pleasing, but for simplicity and efficiency would usually be constrained by quantization levels defined for a given coefficient and block in original encoding. Other embodiments are possible.
At operation 514, an evaluation may be made to determine whether any picture information is present other than that which is stored with DCT coefficients. For example, a number of codecs may preserve or simulate very high frequency data which is not efficiently stored in DCT coefficients. For example, the “Film grain characteristics SEI” from the MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 fidelity extensions, where the general nature of the film grain in a 35 millimeter film print, for example, that has been encoded is represented parametrically, and reconstructed in a decoder, rather than being represented in DCT coefficients. However, permitting such high frequency content to pass in situations such as described throughout may violate usage rights.
When an evaluation at operation 514 is in the negative, process flow may proceed to operation 518, corresponding to termination of the example method 500. When an evaluation at operation 514 is in the affirmative, process flow may proceed to operation 520, corresponding to termination of the example method 500. Here, in the context of very high frequency content, operation 516 may address such an issue by, for example, detecting such data within the received encoded content (see operation 502), and either process the encoded content to remove all representation of higher frequency content, for example by removing parameters that correspond to higher frequencies, or remove the encoded content entirely. Other embodiments are possible, and next, at operation 518, the example method 500 terminates.
As discussed throughout, the present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for transforming live or recorded HD content into reduced resolution content based on domain-specific usage rights, where the reduced resolution content may subsequently be transferred between particular computing systems or devices without violating the usage rights. Aspects of the present disclosure however may be applicable in other scenarios as well such as, for example, transforming live or recorded Ultra-HD content into reduced resolution HD content based on domain-specific usage rights. Still other scenarios are possible.
Referring now to
The computer device 600 is shown comprising hardware elements that can be electrically coupled via a bus 602 (or may otherwise be in communication, as appropriate). The hardware elements may include a processing unit with one or more processors 604, including without limitation one or more general-purpose processors and/or one or more special-purpose processors (such as digital signal processing chips, graphics acceleration processors, and/or the like); one or more input devices 606, which can include without limitation a remote control, a mouse, a keyboard, and/or the like; and one or more output devices 608, which can include without limitation a presentation device (e.g., television), a printer, and/or the like.
The computer system 600 may further include (and/or be in communication with) one or more non-transitory storage devices 610, which can comprise, without limitation, local and/or network accessible storage, and/or can include, without limitation, a disk drive, a drive array, an optical storage device, a solid-state storage device, such as a random access memory (“RAM”), and/or a read-only memory (“ROM”), which can be programmable, flash-updateable, and/or the like. Such storage devices may be configured to implement any appropriate data stores, including without limitation, various file systems, database structures, and/or the like.
The computer system 600 might also include a communications subsystem 612, which can include without limitation a modem, a network card (wireless or wired), an infrared communication device, a wireless communication device, and/or a chipset (such as a Bluetooth™ device, an 802.11 device, a WiFi device, a WiMax device, cellular communication facilities (e.g., GSM, WCDMA, LTE, etc.), and/or the like. The communications subsystem 612 may permit data to be exchanged with a network (such as the network described below, to name one example), other computer systems, and/or any other devices described herein. In many embodiments, the computer device 600 will further comprise a working memory 614, which can include a RAM or ROM device, as described above.
The computer system 600 also can comprise software elements, shown as being currently located within the working memory 614, including an operating system 616, device drivers, executable libraries, and/or other code, such as one or more application programs 618, which may comprise computer programs provided by various embodiments, and/or may be designed to implement methods, and/or configure systems, provided by other embodiments, as described herein. Merely by way of example, one or more procedures described with respect to the method(s) discussed above, and/or system components might be implemented as code and/or instructions executable by a computer (and/or a processor within a computer); in an aspect, then, such code and/or instructions can be used to configure and/or adapt a general purpose computer (or other device) to perform one or more operations in accordance with the described methods.
A set of these instructions and/or code might be stored on a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, such as the storage device(s) 610 described above. In some cases, the storage medium might be incorporated within a computer system, such as computer device 600. In other embodiments, the storage medium might be separate from a computer system (e.g., a removable medium, such as flash memory), and/or provided in an installation package, such that the storage medium can be used to program, configure, and/or adapt a general purpose computer with the instructions/code stored thereon. These instructions might take the form of executable code, which is executable by the computer system 600 and/or might take the form of source and/or installable code, which, upon compilation and/or installation on the computer device 600 (e.g., using any of a variety of generally available compilers, installation programs, compression/decompression utilities, etc.), then takes the form of executable code.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that substantial variations may be made in accordance with specific requirements. For example, customized hardware might also be used, and/or particular elements might be implemented in hardware, software (including portable software, such as applets, etc.), or both. Further, connection to other computing devices such as network input/output devices may be employed.
As mentioned above, in one aspect, some embodiments may employ a computer system (such as the computer system 600) to perform methods in accordance with various embodiments of the invention. According to a set of embodiments, some or all of the procedures of such methods are performed by the computer device 600 in response to processor 604 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions (which might be incorporated into the operating system 616 and/or other code, such as an application program 618) contained in the working memory 614. Such instructions may be read into the working memory 614 from another computer-readable medium, such as one or more of the storage device(s) 610. Merely by way of example, execution of the sequences of instructions contained in the working memory 635 might cause the processor(s) 604 to perform one or more procedures of the methods described herein.
The terms “machine-readable medium” and “computer-readable medium,” as used herein, refer to any medium that participates in providing data that causes a machine to operate in a specific fashion. In an embodiment implemented using the computer system 600, various computer-readable media might be involved in providing instructions/code to processor(s) 704 for execution and/or might be used to store and/or carry such instructions/code. In many implementations, a computer-readable medium is a physical and/or tangible storage medium. Such a medium may take the form of a non-volatile media or volatile media. Non-volatile media include, for example, optical and/or magnetic disks, such as the storage device(s) 610. Volatile media include, without limitation, dynamic memory, such as the working memory 614.
Common forms of physical and/or tangible computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punchcards, papertape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, or any other medium from which a computer can read instructions and/or code.
Various forms of computer-readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to the processor(s) 604 for execution. Merely by way of example, the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk and/or optical disc of a remote computer. A remote computer might load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions as signals over a transmission medium to be received and/or executed by the computer device 600.
The communications subsystem 612 (and/or components thereof) generally will receive signals, and the bus 602 then might carry the signals (and/or the data, instructions, etc. carried by the signals) to the working memory 614, from which the processor(s) 604 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by the working memory 614 may optionally be stored on a non-transitory storage device 610 either before or after execution by the processor(s) 604.
The methods, systems, and devices discussed above are examples. Various configurations may omit, substitute, or add various method steps or procedures, or system components as appropriate. For instance, in alternative configurations, the methods may be performed in an order different from that described, and/or various stages may be added, omitted, and/or combined. Also, features described with respect to certain configurations may be combined in various other configurations. Different aspects and elements of the configurations may be combined in a similar manner. Also, technology evolves and, thus, many of the elements are examples and do not limit the scope of the disclosure or claims.
Specific details are given in the description to provide a thorough understanding of example configurations (including implementations). However, configurations may be practiced without these specific details. For example, well-known circuits, processes, algorithms, structures, and techniques have been shown without unnecessary detail in order to avoid obscuring the configurations. This description provides example configurations only, and does not limit the scope, applicability, or configurations of the claims. Rather, the preceding description of the configurations will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing described techniques. Various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure.
Also, configurations may be described as a process which is depicted as a flow diagram or block diagram. Although each may describe the operations as a sequential process, many of the operations can be performed in parallel or concurrently. In addition, the order of the operations may be rearranged. A process may have additional steps not included in the figure. Furthermore, examples of the methods may be implemented by hardware, software, firmware, middleware, microcode, hardware description languages, or any combination thereof. When implemented in software, firmware, middleware, or microcode, the program code or code segments to perform the necessary tasks may be stored in a non-transitory computer-readable medium such as a storage medium. Processors may perform the described tasks.
Furthermore, the example embodiments described herein may be implemented as logical operations in a computing device in a networked computing system environment. The logical operations may be implemented as: (i) a sequence of computer implemented instructions, steps, or program modules running on a computing device; and (ii) interconnected logic or hardware modules running within a computing device.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 14/303,218, filed Jun. 12, 2014, issued on Dec. 8, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,210,457 and entitled IMAGE DOMAIN COMPLIANCE, which is a continuation of U.S. nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 13/672,557, filed Nov. 8, 2012, issued on Jul. 29, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,793,724, and entitled IMAGE DOMAIN COMPLIANCE. The entire disclosures of the above applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for all purposes, as if fully set forth herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4706121 | Young | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4723246 | Weldon, Jr. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4802215 | Mason | Jan 1989 | A |
| 5187589 | Kono et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5335277 | Harvey et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5483277 | Granger | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5488658 | Hirashima | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5541738 | Mankovitz | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5608652 | Astle | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5642153 | Chaney et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5682597 | Ganek et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684969 | Ishida | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5724646 | Ganek et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5805763 | Lawler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5974218 | Nagasaka et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6049333 | LaJoie et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6263504 | Ebisawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6351474 | Robinett et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6370279 | Paik | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6453115 | Boyle | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6628891 | Vantalon et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6687296 | Sato | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6701528 | Arsenault et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6728883 | Kohashi | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6766523 | Herley | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6771703 | Oguz | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6798971 | Potrebic | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6938208 | Reichardt | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7024676 | Klopfenstein | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7062048 | Livaditis et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7409140 | Rodriguez et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7487529 | Orlick | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7490169 | Ogdon et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7493312 | Liu et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7505081 | Eshleman | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7533402 | Demas et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542656 | Cho et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7577751 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7590993 | Hendricks et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7684672 | Matoba | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7715552 | Pinder et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7730517 | Rey et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7739711 | Finseth et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7760986 | Beuque | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7804861 | Kim | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7848618 | Potrebic et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7856557 | Beuque | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7925141 | Geer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7926078 | Arsenault et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7929697 | McNeely et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7962937 | Cho et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8006268 | Sloo | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8201194 | Wijnands et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8321466 | Black et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8364671 | Sinton et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8437622 | Casagrande | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8447170 | Casagrande | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8483078 | Crookes et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8566873 | Sie et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8584167 | Vanduyn | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8606088 | Kummer et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8627349 | Kirby et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8660412 | Kummer et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8763027 | Martch | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8774608 | Kummer et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8793724 | Robinson | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8819722 | Kummer et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8819761 | Minnick | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8850476 | VanDuyn et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8867893 | Kirby | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8959544 | Kummer et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8959566 | Kummer | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8989562 | Kummer et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8997153 | Templeman | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9031385 | Casagrande et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9043843 | Templeman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9055274 | Casagrande | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9088763 | Martch et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9113222 | VanDuyn | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9177605 | Minnick et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9177606 | Kirby | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9185331 | Martch et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9191694 | Casagrande | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9202524 | Martch et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9210457 | Robinson | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9264779 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9269397 | Casagrande et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9349412 | Templeman | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9350937 | Kummer et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9357159 | Martch et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9361940 | Minnick | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9412413 | Martch | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9489981 | Templeman et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9489982 | Casagrande et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9521440 | Kummer et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9549213 | Templeman et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 20010028782 | Ohno et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010033736 | Yap et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034787 | Takao et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053183 | McVeigh et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010055340 | Kim et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020044658 | Wasilewski et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020054752 | Wood et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055343 | Stetzler et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087979 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087983 | Son et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020092021 | Yap et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095510 | Sie et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020097340 | Takagi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116705 | Perlman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120925 | Logan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126221 | Link | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020141431 | Tripathy | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144259 | Gutta Srinivas et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144266 | Goldman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152299 | Traversat et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020164147 | Suda | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020168178 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174430 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184638 | Agnihortri et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188943 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005454 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030026423 | Unger et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078930 | Surcouf et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097659 | Goldman | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110514 | West et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149988 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030152360 | Mukai et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156826 | Sonoda et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177492 | Kanou | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177495 | Needham et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200548 | Baran et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208763 | McElhatten et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208767 | Williamson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226150 | Berberet et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040001087 | Warmus et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040003118 | Brown et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015992 | Hasegawa et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015999 | Carlucci et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040078829 | Patel et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040080672 | Kessler et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103428 | Seok et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128682 | Liga et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133923 | Watson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040148501 | Livaditis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162871 | Pabla et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218905 | Green et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242150 | Wright et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040268387 | Wendling | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050002640 | Putterman | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050034171 | Benya | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050071877 | Navarro | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050083865 | Ashley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050120049 | Kanegae et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125683 | Matsuyama et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144646 | Lecrom et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050147383 | Ihara | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050180568 | Krause | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229213 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050237435 | Potrebic et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267656 | Dabrowski | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271365 | Hisatomi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273819 | Knudson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050281531 | Unmehopa | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010464 | Azami | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060020962 | Stark et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060056800 | Shimagami et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075434 | Chaney et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078055 | Kanazawa | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080716 | Nishikawa et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085828 | Dureau et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120523 | Kurotaki | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206819 | Tsuji et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212900 | Ismail et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060215993 | Yamada | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060257099 | Potrebic et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274208 | Pedlow, Jr. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070016546 | De Vorchik et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070019930 | Kim | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070039032 | Goldey et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061378 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154163 | Cordray | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070157234 | Walker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070157248 | Ellis | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070157253 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070165855 | Inui | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070183745 | White | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192586 | McNeely | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204288 | Candelore | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234395 | Dureau et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250856 | Leavens et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258596 | Kahn et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299976 | Zafar et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070300250 | Smith et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080022347 | Cohen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080044158 | Kido | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046929 | Cho et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052743 | Moore | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080074547 | Ida | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080092164 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080092181 | Britt | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101760 | Waller | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080104534 | Park et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080127253 | Zhang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080137850 | Mamidwar | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080141322 | Jang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080144747 | Tomizawa | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152039 | Shah et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080184327 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216119 | Pfeffer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216136 | Pfeffer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222678 | Burke et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222681 | Kwon | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271077 | Kim et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080273698 | Manders et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080273856 | Bumgardner | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080276284 | Bumgardner et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288461 | Glennon et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080291206 | Uchimura et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080298585 | Maillard et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301740 | Tsutsui | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080307217 | Yukimatsu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090025027 | Craner | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090051579 | Inaba et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090067621 | Wajs | Mar 2009 | A9 |
| 20090080930 | Shinotsuka et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100466 | Migos | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090110367 | Fukui | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090129741 | Kim | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090129749 | Oyamatsu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090136206 | Aisu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150941 | Riedl et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158370 | Li | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090165057 | Miller et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172722 | Kahn et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090178098 | Westbrook et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210912 | Cholas et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235298 | Carlberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254962 | Hendricks et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090260038 | Acton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090320073 | Reisman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090320084 | Azam et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324203 | Wiklof | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100020794 | Cholas et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100037282 | Iwata et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100043022 | Kaftan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100050225 | Bennett | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100086277 | Craner | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100095323 | Williamson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100100899 | Bradbury et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100115121 | Roos et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100135639 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138865 | Rai et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100146581 | Erk | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100154021 | Howarter et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100158479 | Craner | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100158480 | Jung et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162285 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169926 | Westberg et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100195827 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217613 | Kelly | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100232604 | Eklund, II | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235862 | Adachi | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100239228 | Sano | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100242079 | Riedl et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100246582 | Salinger et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100247067 | Gratton | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251304 | Donoghue et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251305 | Kimble et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100254386 | Salinger et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265391 | Muramatsu et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272419 | Wang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100284537 | Inbar | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100293583 | Loebig et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299528 | Le Floch | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306401 | Gilson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100313222 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100319037 | Kim | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100329645 | Sakamoto | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110001879 | Goldey et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110007218 | Moran et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110008024 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110043652 | King et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078750 | Tam et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110080529 | Wong | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099364 | Robyr et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110106744 | Becker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131413 | Moon et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138169 | Michel | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138424 | Vlot | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145854 | Bacon et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110150429 | Kaneko | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110162011 | Hassell et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110179453 | Poniatowski | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110225616 | Ellis | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110235701 | Kim | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110239249 | Murison et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255002 | Witheiler | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286719 | Woods | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110311045 | Candelore et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120183276 | Quan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120195433 | Eppolito et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198317 | Eppolito et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198501 | Ruan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120236933 | Saitoh et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278837 | Curtis et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120296745 | Harper et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120301104 | Dove | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120311534 | Fox et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120311634 | Van Duyn | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120331505 | Chun et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130014146 | Bhatia et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130014159 | Wiser et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130051555 | Martch et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130051758 | Kummer et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130051764 | Casagrande | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130051766 | Martch et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130051773 | Casagrande | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130054579 | Kennedy | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130055304 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130055305 | Martch et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130055310 | VanDuyn et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130055311 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130055314 | Martch | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130055333 | Kummer | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130081098 | Klughart | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130216208 | Kummer et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130223814 | Casagrande | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243397 | Minnick et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243398 | Templeman et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243399 | Casagrande et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243401 | Casagrande | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243402 | Kummer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243403 | Martch | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243405 | Templeman et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243406 | Kirby | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130247089 | Kummer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130247090 | Kummer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130247106 | Martch et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130247107 | Templeman | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130247111 | Templeman et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130247115 | Minnick | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130298166 | Herrington et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130347037 | Soroushian | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140047477 | VanDuyn | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140050462 | Kummer et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140115636 | Stuckman | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140126889 | Kummer et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140130094 | Kirby et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140147102 | Shartzer et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201767 | Seiden et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140341377 | Kummer et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140344858 | Minnick | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140363139 | Kirby | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140376884 | Lovell | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150040166 | Tamura et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150095948 | Kummer et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150104146 | Higuchi et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150121430 | Templeman | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150208119 | Casagrande et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150208125 | Robinson | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150228305 | Templeman et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150245089 | Protrebic | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150245113 | Casagrande | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150319400 | Golyshko | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160080800 | Casagrande | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160105711 | Martch et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160134926 | Casagrande et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160198215 | Hardy | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160234543 | Templeman | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160249089 | Minnick | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160323632 | Martch et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1595975 | Mar 2005 | CN |
| 1615017 | May 2005 | CN |
| 1926793 | Mar 2007 | CN |
| 101174946 | May 2008 | CN |
| 101202600 | Jun 2008 | CN |
| 101310532 | Nov 2008 | CN |
| 101 404 780 | Apr 2009 | CN |
| 101978690 | Feb 2011 | CN |
| 0 903 743 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 0 793 333 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 1 001 631 | May 2000 | EP |
| 1 168 347 | Feb 2002 | EP |
| 1372339 | Dec 2003 | EP |
| 1 447 983 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 1 667 452 | Jul 2006 | EP |
| 1 742 467 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 2 018 059 | Jan 2009 | EP |
| 2 317 767 | May 2011 | EP |
| 2 357 563 | Aug 2011 | EP |
| 2 541 929 | Jan 2013 | EP |
| 2 826 197 | Jan 2015 | EP |
| 2 826 238 | Jan 2015 | EP |
| 2 459 705 | Nov 2009 | GB |
| 9740CHENP2013 | Sep 2014 | IN |
| 7408CHENP2014 | Jan 2016 | IN |
| 9493CHEN2013 | Jun 2016 | IN |
| 2007 116525 | May 2007 | JP |
| 2010165058 | Jul 2010 | JP |
| 9812872 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| 0124532 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| 0241625 | May 2002 | WO |
| 2004057610 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| 2007047410 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| 2008010118 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008010689 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008060486 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2011081729 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| 2011027236 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 2012003693 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2013028824 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013028829 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013028835 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013138606 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 2013138608 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 2013138610 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 2013138638 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 2013138689 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 2013138740 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 2016066443 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2016111817 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2015/065934 dated Apr. 8, 2016, all pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/EP2015/073937 dated Apr. 15, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/786,915, filed Mar. 6, 2013, Final Rejection dated May 12, 2016, 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/757,606, filed Dec. 23, 2015, Non Final Rejection dated Mar. 24, 2016, 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/340,190, filed Jul. 24, 2014, Final Rejection dated Feb. 19, 2016, 54 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,887, filed Jan. 14, 2014 Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 21, 2016, 26 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,047, filed Nov. 8, 2011 Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 29, 2016, 45 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,598, filed Aug 23, 2011 Notice of Allowance dated May 24, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,968, filed Mar. 13, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 7, 2016, 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,994, Final Office Action dated May 4, 2016, 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/589,090, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 9, 2016, 47 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/338,114, filed Jul. 22, 2014 Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 3, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,989, filed Oct. 31, 2014, Final Rejection dated May 6, 2016, 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,617, filed Oct. 1, 2013, Final Office Action dated May 6, 2016, 56 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2016 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/009928, 1 page. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 16, 2015 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/009919, 1 page. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/51992 dated Nov. 2, 2012, 15 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/51987 dated Oct. 23, 2012, 20 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/051984 dated Nov. 5, 2012, 13 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/52002 dated Oct. 16, 2012, 17 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2013/031432 dated May 28, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/031432 dated Sep. 16, 2014, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2013/031445 dated May 24, 2013, 11 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/031445 dated Sep. 16, 2014, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/052002 dated Apr. 17, 2014, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/51964 dated Nov. 2, 2012, 13 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/052011 dated Dec. 17, 2012, 44 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2012/052011, dated Mar. 6, 2014, 6 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2012/051984, dated Mar. 6, 2014, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2012/051964, dated Apr. 10, 2014, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2012/051992, dated Apr. 3, 2014, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2012/051987, dated Mar. 6, 2014, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report of PCT/KR2007/003521 dated Oct. 23, 2007, 22 pages. |
| International Search Report of PCT/IB2003/005737 dated Mar. 2, 2004, 21 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/032176 dated Sep. 25, 2014, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2013/32176 dated Jun. 25, 2013, 15 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2013/031565 dated May 31, 2013, 82 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/031565 dated Sep. 16, 2014, 18 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/031915 dated Sep. 16, 2014, 5 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2013/031915 dated Jun. 3, 2013, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2013/031440 dated May 30, 2013, 14 pages. |
| European Search Report for EP 12825653 dated Mar. 11, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for EP 12825080 dated Sep. 11, 2014, 10 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for EP 12825521 dated Nov. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for EP 12825474 dated Jan. 7, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for EP 12825430 dated Feb. 3, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 12825147 dated Mar. 27, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for EP 13761291.7 dated Jul. 9, 2015, 8 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for EP 13760902 dated Oct. 20, 2015, all pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for EP 13761427 dated Oct. 19, 2015, all pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for EP 13760237.1 dated Jul. 21, 2015, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/031440 dated Sep. 25, 2014, 8 pages. |
| First Office Action and Search Report from the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) for CN 201280031434.7, dated Jul. 17, 2015, 12 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2015 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/009919, 2 pages. |
| The Notice of Allowance by the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/014677 dated Mar. 19, 2015 is not translated into English, 1 page. |
| Office Action dated May 18, 2015 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/009776, 2 pages. |
| Office Action dated May 12, 2015 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/009723, 2 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2015 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/009928, 2 pages. |
| The Notice of Allowance by the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/014671 dated Apr. 17, 2015, 1 page. |
| The Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/014677 is not translated into English, 2 pages. |
| The second Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2015 for Mexican Pat. Appln. No. MX/a/2013/014217 is not translated into English, 3 pages. |
| The Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2014 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/014907 is not translated into English, 3 pages. |
| The Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2015 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/014671 is not translated into English, 3 pages. |
| The Notice of Allowance by the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/014907 dated Feb. 20, 2015 is not translated into English, 1 page. |
| Author Unknown, “EE Launches home TV service in UK,” dated Oct. 8, 2014, 3 pages. Retrieved on Oct. 13, 2014 from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-29535279. |
| Author Unknown, “EE TV It's simply great television,” Accessed on Oct. 13, 2014, 11 pages. Retrieved from https//ee.co.uk/ee-and-me/ee-tv. |
| Author Unknown, “Move Networks is Delivering the Next Generation of Television,” Move Networks, 2010, obtained online at http://movenetworks.com/, 2 pages. |
| Design and implementation of a multi-stream cableCARD with a high-speed DVB-common descrambler; Joonyoung Jung, Ohyung Kwon, Sooin Lee; In proceeding of: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, Oct. 23-27, 2006, 4 pages. |
| Jensen, Craig, “Fragmentation: the condition, the cause, the cure” Online!, Executive Software International, 1994; ISBN: 0964004909; retrieved from Internet: <URL: www.executive.com/fragbook/fragbook.htm> * Chapter: “How a disk works”, Section: “The original problem”. Retrieved on Jan. 9, 2014, 70 pages. |
| McCann, John, “EE TV set top takes aim at Sky, Virgin Media and YouView,” dated Oct. 8, 2014, 5 pages. Retrieved on Oct. 13, 2014 from http://www.techradar.com/news/television/ee-tv-set-top-box-takes-aim-at-sky-virgin-media-and-youview-1268223. |
| Williams, Christopher, “EE to launch TV set-top box,” dated Oct. 7, 2014, 2 pages. Retrieved on Oct. 13, 2014 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/telecoms/11147319/EE-to-launch-TV-set-top-box.html. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/786,915, filed Mar. 6, 2013, Non Final Rejection dated Oct. 15, 2015, 59 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/340,190, filed Jul. 24, 2014, Non-Final Rejection dated Aug. 31, 2015, 74 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,887, filed Jan. 14, 2014 Non-Final Rejection dated Jul. 17, 2015, 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/467,959, filed Aug. 25, 2014 Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 22, 2015, 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/888,012, filed May 6, 2013 Non-Final Rejection dated Apr. 6, 2015, 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/888,012, filed May 6, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 14, 2015, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/856,752, filed Apr. 4, 2013 Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2014, 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/856,752, filed Apr. 4, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 10, 2015, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,168, filed Feb. 1, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 14, 2014, 28 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,168, filed Feb. 1, 2013, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2014, 23 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,604, filed Mar. 13, 2013, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 24, 2015, 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,604, filed Mar. 13, 2013, Notice of Allowance dated May 29, 2015, 46 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,604, filed Mar. 13, 2013, Final Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2015, 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,604, filed Mar. 13, 2013, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2014, 24 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,852, filed May 31, 2011, Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2012, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,852, filed May 31, 2011, Final Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2013, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,852, filed May 31, 2011, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 11, 2013, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,157, filed Oct. 31, 2011, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2013, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,157, filed Oct. 31, 2011, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2013, 49 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,157, filed Oct. 31, 2011, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 3, 2014, 81 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,702, filed Aug. 23, 2011, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 11, 2013, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,002, filed Nov. 2, 2011, Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2013, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,002, filed Nov. 2, 2011, Final Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2014, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,002, filed Nov. 2, 2011 Non Final Rejection dated Jul. 28, 2015, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,852, filed Nov. 22, 2011 Non-Final Rejection dated May 23, 2013, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,852, filed Nov. 22, 2011, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 19, 2015, 26 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,852, filed Nov. 22, 2011, Final Rejection dated Dec. 9, 2013, 23 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,852, filed Nov. 22, 2011, Non-Final Rejection dated Sep. 2, 2014, 28 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,852, filed Nov. 22, 2011, Final Rejection dated Mar. 30, 2015, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/324,831, filed Dec. 13, 2011, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2013, 23 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/324,831, filed Dec. 13, 2011, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 4, 2013, 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,047, filed Nov. 8, 2011, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2013, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,047, filed Nov. 8, 2011, Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2013, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,047, filed Nov. 8, 2011 Final Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2015, 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,047, filed Nov. 8, 2011 Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2015, 28 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/614,899, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2013, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/614,899, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Non-Final Office Action dated May 20, 2014, 25 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/614,899, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2013, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/614,899, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Final Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2014, 41 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/614,899, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 13, 2015, 35 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/291,014, filed Nov. 7, 2011, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2013, 21 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/291,014, filed Nov. 7, 2011, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 7, 2013, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,598, filed Aug. 23, 2011, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2013, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,598, filed Aug. 23, 2011, Final Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2013, 23 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,598, filed Aug. 23, 2011, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2014, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,598, filed Aug. 23, 2011 Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2014, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,598, filed Aug. 23, 2011 Final Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2014, 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,598, filed Aug. 23, 2011 Final Office Action dated May 5, 2015, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,598, filed Aug. 23, 2011 Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2015, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,655, filed Aug. 23, 2011, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2013, 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,655, filed Aug. 23, 2011, Final Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2013, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,916, filed Aug. 23, 2011, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 4, 2013, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,005, filed Nov. 11, 2011 Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 31, 2014, 24 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,005, filed Nov. 11, 2011 Non-Final Office Action dated May 20, 2014, 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,005, filed Nov. 11, 2011, Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2013, 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,005, filed Nov. 11, 2011, Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2014, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,976, filed Aug. 23, 2012, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 7, 2013, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,173, filed Mar. 12, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 24, 2014, 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,173, filed Mar. 12, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 26, 2015, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,173, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Non Final Office Action dated May 15, 2014, 28 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,653, filed Mar. 13, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 26, 2014, 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,653, filed Mar. 13, 2013, Non Final Office Action dated May 8, 2014, 24 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,968, filed Mar. 13, 2013 Non Final Office Action dated May 21, 2015, 49 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,968, filed Mar. 13, 2013 Final Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2015, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,350, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2014, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,350, filed Mar. 14, 2013 Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2014, 24 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,350, filed Mar. 14, 2013 Final Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2015, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,350, filed Mar. 14, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 24, 2015, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,001, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 25, 2014, 43 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,719, filed Mar. 13, 2013, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2013, 79 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,719, filed Mar. 13, 2013, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 23, 2014, 141 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,994, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2015, 55 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,423, filed Oct. 28, 2013, Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2013, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,423, filed Oct. 28, 2013, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 4, 2013, 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/060,388, filed Oct. 22, 2013, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2015, 44 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,636, filed Mar. 11, 2013, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2014, 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,636, filed Mar. 11, 2013, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 28, 2015, 43 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,860, filed Dec. 3, 2013 Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2014, 45 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,860, filed Dec. 3, 2013 Final Office Action dated May 1, 2015, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,860, filed Dec. 3, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 13, 2015, 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,860, filed Dec. 3, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 19, 2015, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/338,114, filed Jul. 22, 2014 Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2015, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,989, filed Oct. 31, 2014 Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2015, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,914, filed Mar. 6, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 21, 2014, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,914, filed Mar. 6, 2013 Final Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2014, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,914, filed Mar. 6, 2013, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2013, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/800,477, filed Mar. 13, 2013 Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2014, 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/800,477, filed Mar. 13, 2013 Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 18, 2015, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,617, filed Oct. 1, 2013 Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2015, 45 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,617, filed Oct. 1, 2013 Final Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2015, 45 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,617, filed Oct. 1, 2013 Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2015, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/676,137, filed Apr. 1, 2015 Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 28, 2015, 35 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,549, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2015, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,002, filed Nov. 2, 2011 Final Rejection dated Jan. 13, 2016, 22 pages. |
| Second Office Action for CN 201280031434.7, dated Dec. 23, 2015, 6 pages. |
| First Office Action issued by State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) for CN 201280028697.2, dated Dec. 16, 2015, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance received for Mexican Patent Appln. MX/a/2013/014991, dated Dec. 9, 2015, 1 page. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 4, 2015 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/009723, 1 page. |
| Author Unknown, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Specification for Service Information (SI) in DVB systems,” ETSI EN 300 468 V1.9.1 (Mar. 2009), 116 pages. |
| DVB Organization: “En300468v1.14.1-si-dat201r81—SI Specification.pdf”, DVB, Digital Video Broadcasting, c/o EBU-17A Ancienne Route—CH-1218 Grand Saconnex, Geneva—Switzerland, Sep. 25, 2012 , XP017840182, 172 pages. |
| European Search Report dated Apr. 3, 2014, EP 13192169, 9 pages. |
| Kim, Hee-Yong et al, “DCT Domain Filter for ATV Down Conversion,” Consumer Electronics, 1997. Digest of Technical Papers. ICCE., International Conference on, IEEE, Jun. 11, 1997, pp. 142-143, XP032381904, DOI: 10.1109/ICCE.1997.625904, ISBN: 978-0-7803-3734-3, 2 pages. |
| Office Action for EP 13 192 169.4 dated Mar. 29, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/786,915, filed Mar. 6, 2013, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 19, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/757,606, filed Dec. 23, 2015, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 18, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/340,190, filed Jul. 24, 2014, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 22, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,549, Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,549, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,188 Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,617, filed Oct. 1, 2013, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,617, filed Oct. 1, 2013, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 23, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,868, filed Apr. 18, 2016 Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2017, all pages. |
| Notice of Publication for BR 11 2013 032035-4 dated Dec. 20, 2016, 1 page. |
| Notice of Publication for BR 11 2013 032380-9 dated Jan. 3, 2017, 1 page. |
| Notice of Publication for BR 11 2013 032377-9 dated Jan. 3, 2017, 1 page. |
| Office Action for European Application No. 12825147 dated Mar. 7, 2016, all pages. |
| First Office Action and Search Report for CN Appln No. 201380014409.2 dated Oct. 9, 2016, all pages. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2016 for EP 13 761 291.7, all pages. |
| Evans, Brent: “GeekTonic: Jan. 25, 2009-Feb. 1, 2009”, Jan. 31, 2009, SP55322053, Retreived from the Internet: URL: http://www.geektonic.com/2009—01—25—archive.html [retrieved on Nov. 23, 2016]. |
| First Office Action and Search Report from the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) for CN 201280031150.8, dated Aug. 3, 2016, 10 pages. |
| Decision to Grant from the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) for CN 201280031434.7, dated May 12, 2016, all pages. |
| Second Office Action issued by State Intellectual Property Office for CN 201280028697.2, dated Jul. 8, 2016, all pages. |
| First Office Action and Search Report for CN Appln No. 201280030476.9 dated Aug. 9, 2016, all pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 21, 2016 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2015/10334, 1 page. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 3, 2016 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2015/009985, 1 page. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 6, 2016 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2015/015383, 1 page. |
| Author Unknown, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Specification for Service Information (SI) in DVB systems,” ETSI EN 300 468 V1.1 (Jan. 2013), 172 pages. |
| Author Unknown, Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Content Protection and Copy Management (DVB-CPCM); Part 3: CPCM Usage State Information; European Broadcasting Union Union Europa de Radio-Television, ETSI TS 102 825-3 V1.1.1 (Jul. 2008), XP014042034, 28 pages. |
| Hee-Yong Kim et al., “DCT Domain Filter for ATV Down Conversion”, Consumer Electronics, 1997. Digest of Technical Papers. ICCE., International Conference on, IEEE, Jun. 11, 1997, pp. 142-143, XP032381904, DOI: 10.1109/ICCE. 1997.625904, ISBN: 978-0-7803-3734-3. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,366, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2017, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/141,304, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2017, all pages. |
| Notice of Publication for BR 11 2013 032860-6 dated Jan. 24, 2017, 1 page. |
| Office Action for European Application No. 12825147 dated Aug. 23, 2016, all pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,188 Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2017, all pages. |
| Office Action for EP 128254745 dated Aug. 4, 2017, all pages. |
| Wikipedia: “MPEG-2 Transmission”, Internet Citation, Jan. 31, 2001, pp. 1-9, XP002715999, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/future-net/digital-video/mpeg2-trans.html [retrieved on Nov. 7, 2013]. |
| International Prelminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2015/065934 dated Jul. 11, 2017, all pages. |
| Anonymous: “The Angry Technician's Guide to streaming Freeview via VLC, you Idiots / The Angry Technician”, Jun. 24, 2010, XP055388589, Retrieved from the internet: URL: https://angrytechnician.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/the-angry-technicians-guide-to-streaming-freeview-via-vlc-you-idiots/ [retrieved on Jul. 6, 2017], 14 pages. |
| Anonymous: “Documentation: Playback—VideoLAN Wiki”, Dec. 25, 2010, XP055388595, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://wiki.videolan.org/index.php?Title=Documentation: Playback&oldid=18460 [retrieved on Jul. 6, 2017], 3 pages. |
| Anonymous: “How to Watch DVB-T With VLC Media Player”, Jan. 25, 2009, XP055388602, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.izitips.com/software/how-to-watch-dvb-t-with-vlc-media-player/ [retrieved on Jul. 6, 2017], 3 pages. |
| Anonymous: “News—VideoLAN”, Jul. 15, 2011, XP055388604, Retreived from the Internet: URL: http://www.videolan.org/news.html#news-2011-07-15 [retrieved on Jul. 6, 2017], 69 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2017 for EP 12825147.7, 7 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160073144 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14303218 | Jun 2014 | US |
| Child | 14944758 | US | |
| Parent | 13672557 | Nov 2012 | US |
| Child | 14303218 | US |