IMAGE FORMATION APPARATUS

Abstract

An image formation apparatus is disclosed. The image formation apparatus includes a transfer effectiveness detector that further includes a computing unit for converting a sensor output voltage into a toner adhesion amount, and a transfer effectiveness detecting unit for obtaining transfer effectiveness by comparing a toner adhesion amount Td on a photo conductor with a toner adhesion amount Tb on a middle transfer object. Here, the toner adhesion amount Td is obtained by the computing unit converting an output of a photo conductor image detection unit, and the toner adhesion amount Tb is obtained by the computing unit converting an output of a middle transfer object image detection unit. When the transfer effectiveness detection unit determines that an abnormality is present in the transfer, whether the abnormality is due to decreased development capacity or due to decreased transfer effectiveness can be determined. If it is determined that the transfer effectiveness is less than a threshold value, a printing operation of the image formation apparatus is stopped given that the transfer effectiveness compensation is not possible.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an image formation apparatus according to an embodiment the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an image detection unit of a photo conductor according to the embodiment the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a first toner adhesion amount control unit;

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an image detection unit of a middle transfer belt;

FIG. 5 is a graph for explaining the first toner adhesion amount control;

FIG. 6 is a graph showing toner adhesion amounts on image supporting objects according to the first toner adhesion amount control;

FIG. 7 is a graph for explaining the second toner adhesion amount control;

FIG. 8A is a graph showing toner adhesion amounts on the image supporting objects where a patch is detected at the middle transfer belt according to the second toner adhesion amount control;

FIG. 8B is a graph showing toner adhesion amounts on the image supporting object where the patch is detected at the photo conductor according to the second toner adhesion amount control;

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of the second toner adhesion amount control unit; and

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram showing installation of the image detection unit.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the following, embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 shows the outline configuration of an image formation apparatus according to the embodiment of the present invention. With reference to FIG. 1, the image formation apparatus includes a middle transfer belt 101 serving as a middle transfer object, a first image formation unit 102, a second image formation unit 103, a third image formation unit 104, a fourth image formation unit 105, primary transfer rollers 106 through 109 serving as a primary transfer unit, a middle transfer object image detection unit 110 (that is an optical reflection type density sensor including a luminous source and an optical receiving unit), belt support rollers 111 through 113, a secondary transfer roller 114 serving as a secondary transfer unit (the support roller 113 may serve as the secondary transfer roller), a recording medium such as Paper S serving as a final image supporting object, a fixing unit 115, a resist roller pair 116, a feed cassette 117, and a feed roller 118.

The image formation unit 102 includes the following items as shown in FIG. 2, namely, a photo conductor 202 serving as an image supporting object, a charging unit 201 for electrifying (charging) the photo conductor 202, an exposing unit 203, a laser light 204 irradiated by the exposing unit 203, a developing unit 205, a photo conductor cleaner 206, an eraser 207, and a photo conductor image detection unit 208 (optical reflection type density sensor including a luminous source and an optical receiving unit). The image formation units 103 through 105 are configured the same as the image formation unit 102.

Image formation operations performed by the image formation unit 102 are described. First, the charging unit 201 uniformly electrifies the photo conductor 202. Then, the exposing unit 203 irradiates the laser light to the photo conductor 202 according to image data, a discharge potential is provided by the laser light, and a latent image is formed.

Then, the latent image formed on the photo conductor 202 is developed with a toner by the developing unit 205 between a development potential and the discharge potential, and a toner image is formed. Next, the toner image formed on the photo conductor 202 is transferred to the middle transfer belt 101 with the primary transfer roller 106. Then, the eraser 207 uniformly irradiates a light onto the photo conductor 202 such that all electric charges of the photo conductor 202 are discharged.

Operations of the image formation units 103 through 105 are the same as described above, but color of the toner is different. That is, toner images in respective colors are similarly formed on the corresponding photo conductors 202. The toner images are transferred to the middle transfer belt 101 with the primary transfer rollers 107 through 109 so that all the toner images in different colors are superposed. The superposed toner images now constitute a color image, and the color image is transferred from the middle transfer belt 101 to Paper S with the secondary transfer roller 114. The color image is fixed by the fixing unit 115, and a series of printing processes is completed.

Residual toner that remains on the photo conductor 202 without being transferred to the middle transfer belt 101 is recovered by the photo conductor cleaner 206.

Next, with reference to FIG. 3 through FIG. 7, descriptions follow about toner adhesion amount control whereby image formation conditions are controlled such that the toner adhesion amount detected by the middle transfer object image detection unit 110 on Paper S may be within a predetermined range.

FIG. 3 shows the configuration of a first toner adhesion amount control unit, and FIG. 4 shows the configuration of the middle transfer object image detection unit 110.

With reference to FIG. 3, a density patch 301 formed on the middle transfer belt 101 is detected by the middle transfer object image detection unit 110 that includes a luminous source 401 for irradiating a light, an optical receiving unit A 402 and an optical receiving unit B 403 as shown in FIG. 4.

The light is irradiated by the luminous source 401 to the density patch 301 on the middle transfer belt 101. The light reflected by the density patch 301 is received by the optical receiving units A and B, 402 and 403, respectively; and output voltages corresponding to the toner adhesion amount of the density patch 301 are obtained. The output voltages provided by the middle transfer object image detection unit 110 are converted into a toner adhesion amount of the density patch 301 by a computing unit 302 (described below). Then, the image formation conditions are adjusted so that the toner adhesion amount may be equal to a target amount. Here, the image formation conditions include the electrification potential of the charging unit 201, an exposure amount 204 of the exposing unit 203, and a development bias potential of a biasing unit 303.

Hereafter, factors that cause fluctuation of the toner adhesion amount on Paper S are described. The factors include degradation of a developer, decline of transfer effectiveness, and degradation of development capacity due to an environmental change. First, the adhesion amount control at the time of the degradation of the development capacity is described.

The toner adhesion amount control is described with reference to FIG. 5. The horizontal axis represents a development potential difference, which is a difference between the development bias potential and a residual potential. The vertical axis represents the toner adhesion amount on the photo conductor 202. An upper of two lines in FIG. 5 represents initial development capacity, and the other, that is, a lower line represents degraded development capacity when the developer is degraded with the time and environments.

When the toner adhesion amount control is to adjust the toner adhesion amount on the photo conductor 202 to Td as a control target, a required development potential difference is Vα1 in the case wherein the developer has the initial development capacity.

In the case wherein the development capacity is degraded, a development potential difference Vα2 is required to obtain the control target Td, which Vα2 is greater than Vα1. That is, a greater development potential difference is required, and for this reason, a greater electrification potential is required for the photo conductor 202.

Although the relationship is Vα1<Vα2 in this description, the relationship may become Vα1>Vα2 if the development capacity becomes high because the toner density becomes high.

Next, the adhesion amount control at the time of the decline of the transfer effectiveness is described.

FIG. 6 shows relationships of toner adhesion amounts of the density patch 301 formed on image supporting objects at various stages with reference to a target toner adhesion amount of the output image.

Here, the image supporting objects are the photo conductor 202, the middle transfer belt 101, and Paper S. We suppose that the toner adhesion amount on Paper S is desired to be within a range 601. Then, the toner adhesion amount on the middle transfer belt 101 is allowed to take a range 602; and the toner adhesion amount on the photo conductor 202 is allowed to take a range 603 under a given transfer effectiveness. The toner adhesion amount on the photo conductor 202 is required to take a range 604 when the transfer effectiveness becomes less than the given transfer effectiveness.

The range 601 of the toner adhesion amount on Paper S is expressed by ΔTp=Tp1˜Tp2. The range 602 of the toner adhesion amount on the middle transfer belt 101 is expressed by ΔTb=Tb1˜Tb2. The range 603 of the toner adhesion amount on the photo conductor is expressed by ΔTd=Td1˜Td2. Further, normal primary transfer effectiveness (transfer from the photo conductor 202 to the middle transfer belt 101) is defined to range between maximum γ1 MAX<=1 and minimum γ1 min<=1; and the secondary transfer effectiveness (transfer from the middle transfer belt 101 to Paper S) is defined to range between maximum γ2 MAX<=1 and minimum γ2 min<=1.

In order for the range 601 of the toner adhesion amount on Paper S to be within the range ΔTp, Tp1 and Tp2 have to suffice for the following conditions.

Tp1 and Tp2 that define the range ΔTp are expressed as follows.

Tp1=(Td1×γ1 MAX)×γ2 MAX

Tp2=(Td2×γ1 min)×γ2 min

That is, the range 603 of the toner adhesion amount on the photo conductor 202 has to be between Td1 and Td2 expressed as follows.

That is, Td1 and Td2 that define the range ΔTd are expressed as follows.

Td1=Tp1/(γ1 MAX×γ2 MAX)

Td2=Tp2/(γ1 min×γ2 min)

The above is true so long as the primary transfer effectiveness and the secondary transfer effectiveness stay within the respective ranges.

If the primary transfer effectiveness is remarkably decreased to be between γ0 MAX<=1 and γ0 min<=1, where γ1 MAX>γ0 MAX, and γ1 min>γ0 min, a greater adhesion amount, ranging between Td3 and Td4, is required. The relationships now are:

Tp1=(Td3×γ0 MAX)×γ2 MAX

Tp2=(Td4×γ0 min)×γ2 min

That is, the range 604 of the tone adhesion amount on the photo conductor 202 has to range between Td3 and Td4 as follows.

Td3=Tp1/(γ0 MAX×γ2 MAX)

Td4=Tp2/(γ0 min×γ2 min)

Accordingly, Td1>Td3 and Td2>Td4; that is, a greater amount of toner has to be developed, which requires a greater development potential difference, which, in turn, requires a greater electrification potential. This increases the burden on the photo conductor 202, its service life is shortened, and toner consumption is increased.

As described above, according to the toner adhesion amount control, the development potential difference is increased when the development capacity and the transfer effectiveness are decreased, which results in shortening the service life of the photo conductor 202. In order to reduce the burden of the photo conductor 202, the development potential difference is desired to be small as much as possible.

If a superfluous development potential difference is required, it is due to a remarkable decrease of the development capacity and the transfer effectiveness; this abnormal situation can be detected based on the development capacity.

FIG. 7 is a graph showing relationships between the toner adhesion amount on the photo conductor 202 and a transfer effectiveness fluctuation. An abnormal state detection is described with reference to FIG. 7, wherein the horizontal axis represents the development potential difference, and the vertical axis represents the toner adhesion amount on the photo conductor 202.

At a given transfer effectiveness, a development potential difference Vα3 provides a toner adhesion amount Tda, where the Tda=(Td1−Td2)/2; that is, Tda is a median value of the range 603 that is defined by Td1 and Td2 at a given development capacity.

If the transfer effectiveness is decreased, the toner adhesion amount on the photo conductor 202 has to be adjusted to be in the range 604 that is defined by Td3 and Td4, the median value of which range 604 is Tdb=(Td3−Td4)/2. A development potential difference Vα4 is required to obtain the median value Tdb at the given development capacity.

Here, it is conceivable that the abnormal state be detected if Vαref<Vα4, where Vαref is a predetermined reference development potential within a difference between the maximum of the development bias potential 303 and an electric discharge potential. However, according to the toner adhesion amount control by the middle transfer image detection unit 110, it is impossible to distinguish whether Vα4 becomes greater than Vαref (Vαref<Vα4)

due to the decrease of the development capacity by the environmental fluctuation, which capacity is based on the toner adhesion amount to the development potential difference as shown in FIG. 5, or

due to the transfer effectiveness fluctuation as shown in FIG. 6.

For this reason, according to the embodiment, a transfer effectiveness detector 900 is provided as shown in FIG. 9. The transfer effectiveness detector 900 includes

a computing unit 302 for converting a sensor output voltage into a toner adhesion amount, and

a transfer effectiveness detecting unit 902 for detecting an abnormality of the transfer effectiveness, wherein the toner adhesion amount Td on the photo conductor is compared with the toner adhesion amount Tb on the middle transfer object so that the transfer effectiveness may be computed. Here, Td and Tb are obtained by the computing unit 302 converting detection information provided by the photo conductor image detection unit 208 and the middle transfer object image detection unit 110, respectively.

In this way, whether the abnormality is due to the decrease of the development capacity or due to the decrease of the transfer effectiveness can be determined, and a suitable measure can be taken.

Furthermore, according to the present embodiment, the image formation apparatus includes an image detection switching unit 901 for selecting one of the photo conductor image detection unit 208 and the middle transfer object image detection unit 110.

The photo conductor image detection unit 208 and the middle transfer object image detection unit 110 are arranged at the same location in the main scanning direction as shown in FIG. 10 so that the same density patch 301 is detected in order to accurately acquire the transfer effectiveness.

The transfer effectiveness detector 900 determines that the transfer effectiveness is abnormal if transfer effectiveness γ=(Tb/Td) is below a predetermined threshold value, for example, 70%. Where the transfer effectiveness cannot be compensated for, the image formation apparatus is considered faulty, and the printing operation is stopped.

As described above, according to the embodiment of the present invention, the image formation apparatus detects the transfer effectiveness fluctuation even in an environment where transfer effectiveness is remarkably decreased, and is capable of forming the image with a toner adhesion amount on the photo conductor that is stabilized wherein the toner consumption is reduced.

Hereafter, the range 603, which is the tolerance of the adhesion amount on the photo conductor 202, is described. The relationships between the range 603 and the range 601 (the tolerance of the adhesion amount on Paper S) are described above with reference to FIG. 6.

FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B show relationships between toner adhesion amounts of the density patch 301 formed on the image supporting objects. A detection error 801 is due to the image detection unit. A detection error 802 is the detection error 801 reflected onto the photo conductor error 202 considering the primary transfer effectiveness fluctuation.

A range 803 represents a toner adhesion amount tolerance other than an adhesion amount control error when the density patch 301 is detected at the middle transfer belt 101.

A range 804 represents a toner adhesion amount tolerance other than the adhesion amount control error when the density patch 301 is detected at the photo conductor 202, specifically, adhesion amount fluctuations in axial directions and a circumferential direction of the photo conductor 202. That is, the range 804 is for a sum of toner adhesion amount fluctuations due to such as an installation error of the developing unit 205, roller eccentricity of the photo conductor 202, and a change of adhesion amount during a toner adhesion amount control period.

The case wherein the density patch 301 is detected at the middle transfer belt 101 is described with reference to FIG. 8A.

When the detection error 801 at the middle transfer belt is expressed as ΔTs1=Ts1˜Ts2, and the detection error 802 at the photo conductor is expressed as ΔTs2=Ts3˜Ts4, relationships between ΔTs1 and ΔTs2, i.e., relationships between Ts1, Ts2, Ts3, and Ts4 are as follows.

Ts3=Ts1/γ1 MAX

Ts4=Ts2/γ1 min

Accordingly, ΔTs2 is greater than ΔTs1 by the factor of the transfer effectiveness.

Next, the case wherein the density patch 301 is detected at the photo conductor 202 is described with reference to FIG. 8B.

When the detection error 801 is detected as ΔTs1=Ts5˜Ts6, the detection error 802 at the photo conductor is equal to ΔTs1. This is because it is not necessary to take the transfer effectiveness into consideration.

When detecting the density patch 301 at the middle transfer belt 101,

$\begin{array}{c}\Delta \mathrm{Td}=\mathrm{the}\mathrm{detection}\mathrm{error}802\mathrm{at}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{photo}\mathrm{conductor}+\\ \mathrm{the}\mathrm{toner}\mathrm{adhesion}\mathrm{amount}\mathrm{tolerance}803\\ =\Delta \mathrm{Ts}2+\mathrm{the}\mathrm{toner}\mathrm{adhesion}\mathrm{amount}803.\end{array}$

When detecting the density patch 301 at the photo conductor 202,

$\begin{array}{c}\Delta \mathrm{Td}=\mathrm{the}\mathrm{detection}\mathrm{error}801+\\ \mathrm{the}\mathrm{toner}\mathrm{adhesion}\mathrm{amount}\mathrm{tolerance}804\\ =\Delta \mathrm{Ts}1+\mathrm{the}\mathrm{toner}\mathrm{adhesion}\mathrm{amount}\mathrm{tolerance}804.\end{array}$

Since Ts2>ΔTs1, the toner adhesion amount tolerance 803<the toner adhesion amount tolerance 804; that is, the tolerance available for the toner adhesion amount fluctuations is greater, which fluctuations are due to such as the installation error of the developing unit 205, the roller eccentricity of the photo conductor 202, and the change of adhesion amount during the toner adhesion amount control period.

That is, for detecting the density patch, the photo conductor image detection unit 208 is used when controlling the image formation conditions, and the middle transfer object image detection unit 110, which is closer to the final image, is used during printing, wherein the detection units are switched by the image detection switching unit 901. In this way, further improvement in stabilization of the images is attained.

As described, according to the embodiment of the present invention, an image formation apparatus that is capable of providing an image that is stabilized is realized by controlling the adhesion amount based on the detection result of the density patch 301 at the photo conductor 202, rather than the detection result of the density patch 301 at the middle transfer belt 101.

Further, the present invention is not limited to these embodiments, but variations and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.

The present application is based on Japanese Priority Application No. 2006-201306 filed on Jul. 24, 2006 with the Japanese Patent Office, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

Claims

1. An image formation apparatus, comprising: a plurality of image formation units for forming toner images in different colors on corresponding image supporting objects;a middle transfer object, to which the toner images in different colors formed on the image supporting objects of the image formation units are transferred one by one;an image detection unit that includes a luminous source for irradiating a light to a position where the toner image passes, and an optical receiving unit for receiving the light that is reflected by the toner image; anda control unit for controlling image formation conditions based on a detection result of the image detection unit; whereinthe image detection unit includes an image supporting object image detection unit that is arranged countering each of the image supporting objects of the image formation units, and a middle transfer object image detection unit that is arranged countering the middle transfer object, andthe image formation unit includes a transfer effectiveness detection unit for detecting transfer effectiveness between the image supporting object and the middle transfer object by detecting a difference between a toner adhesion amount of a toner image of a color detected by the image supporting object image detection unit and a toner adhesion amount of the toner image in the same color detected by the middle transfer object image detection unit for all the colors.

2. The image formation apparatus as claimed in claim 1, comprising an image detection switching unit for switching between the image supporting object image detection unit and the middle transfer object image detection unit.

3. The image formation apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the image supporting object image detection unit and the middle transfer object image detection unit are arranged at the same location in a main scanning direction.

4. The image formation apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein a printing operation is stopped when the transfer effectiveness detected by the transfer effectiveness detection unit is different from target transfer effectiveness.

5. The image formation apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein the image detection switching unit selects the image supporting object image detection unit when controlling image formation conditions, and selects the middle transfer object image detection unit during printing.