1. Field of the Invention
The present invention mainly relates to an image forming apparatus such as a copying machine or printer of an electrophotography system or electrostatic storage system and, more particularly, to a control of a density and registration in an image forming apparatus.
2. Description of the Related Art
An image forming apparatus including a plurality of photosensitive members often causes relative misregistration between colors due to mechanical attachment errors of the photosensitive members, errors of optical path lengths of laser beams of respective colors, changes of optical path lengths, and the like. Also, image densities of respective colors vary depending on usage environments and various conditions such as the number of copies to be printed, thus causing a color balance variation.
For this reason, Japanese Patent Laid-Open Nos. 01-167769 and 11-143171 disclose an arrangement in which detection patterns as toner images used to detect misregistration amounts and densities are respectively formed on an intermediate transfer belt so as to correct the misregistration and densities. In these documents, misregistration and density detection patterns are detected by a single detection unit, thereby avoiding increases of a size and cost of the apparatus.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-166553 discloses an arrangement in which when misregistration and density corrections have to be successively executed, both misregistration and density detection patterns are formed on an intermediate transfer belt and are detected, thereby shortening a time required for correction control processing.
A sensor used to detect a density is controlled to be able to detect a density even when the intermediate transfer belt and light-emitting element deteriorate. By contrast, since misregistration detection uses a toner density in a detection pattern or a density difference between the detection pattern and the surface of the intermediate transfer belt, for example, when the density difference is small, misregistration often fails to be detected. When misregistration fails to be detected, process conditions (for example, a laser light amount, charging bias, developing bias, and the like) are changed based on the density detection result, and misregistration detection is restarted, resulting in a long correction control time.
The present invention provides an image forming apparatus which can detect both misregistration and density detection patterns using the same settings.
According to an aspect of the present invention, an image forming apparatus includes: an image forming unit configured to form toner images of respective colors on an image carrier; a detection unit configured to irradiate a surface of the image carrier or the toner images formed on the image carrier with light, and to receive reflection light; and a control unit configured to control to detect a relative misregistration amount of the toner images of the respective colors formed on the image carrier by determining, using a threshold, a received light amount of the detection unit when the detection unit detects a first detection pattern as a toner image formed on the image carrier, and to detect densities of the toner images of the respective colors formed on the image carrier by detecting, by the detection unit, a second detection pattern as a toner image formed on the image carrier. The first detection pattern includes a black portion as a portion of a black toner image, and a color portion as another color portion, and the control unit is further configured to form, when the misregistration amount and the densities are successively detected, both the first detection pattern and the second detection pattern on the image carrier, to set a light-emitting amount of the detection unit, the threshold, or a sensitivity of the detection unit so that a received light amount of diffuse reflection light from the black portion received by the detection unit is less than the threshold and a received light amount of diffuse reflection light from the color portion received by the detection unit exceeds the threshold, and to set the light-emitting amount of the detection unit or the sensitivity of the detection unit so that the received light amount of the diffuse reflection light from the color portion is less than an upper limit value of the received light amount of the diffuse reflection light configured to be received by the detection unit.
Further features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
A charging roller 2a is in contact with a photosensitive member 1a as an image carrier and uniformly charges the surface of that photosensitive member. An exposure unit 11a forms an electrostatic latent image on the photosensitive member 1a by irradiating the surface of the photosensitive member 1a with a laser beam 12a, which is modulated based on an image signal. A developing unit 8a has yellow toner, and forms a toner image by developing the electrostatic latent image on the photosensitive member 1a with the toner using a developing roller 4a which is in contact with the photosensitive member 1a. A primary transfer roller 81a transfers the toner image formed on the photosensitive member 1a onto the intermediate transfer belt 80 as an image carrier. A cleaning unit 3a cleans the toner which is not transferred onto the intermediate transfer belt 80 and remains on the photosensitive member 1a. Note that the photosensitive member 1a, charging roller 2a, cleaning unit 3a, and developing unit 8a form an integrated process cartridge 9a which is detachable from the image forming apparatus.
The intermediate transfer belt 80 is supported by three rollers, that is, a secondary transfer opposing roller 86, driving roller 14, and tension roller 15, so as to maintain an appropriate tension. By driving the driving roller 14, the intermediate transfer belt 80 moves at roughly equal velocities in a forward direction with respect to the photosensitive members 1a to 1d. By transferring toner images of respective colors on the intermediate transfer belt 80 to overlap each other, a color image is formed. The toner image transferred on the intermediate transfer belt 80 is transferred onto a printing material conveyed along a conveyance path 87 by a secondary transfer roller 82. The toner image transferred onto the printing material is fixed by a fixing unit (not shown).
The image forming unit includes a sensor unit 60 used to implement misregistration/density detection/correction at a position opposing the intermediate transfer belt 80, as shown in
Upon reception of the image signals from the controller 301, an image processing GA 312 transmits image forming data to the image control unit 313, which controls the image forming unit so as to form detection patterns on the intermediate transfer belt 80 based on the image forming data. After that, the CPU 311 acquires voltage values according to the densities of the detection patterns from the sensor unit 60. The CPU 311 calculates density correction amounts of the formed detection patterns of respective colors and misregistration correction amounts of the detection patterns of the respective colors in the main scanning direction and sub-scanning direction, based on the detection voltage values from the sensor unit 60. The CPU 311 notifies the controller 301 of the calculated misregistration correction amounts and density correction amounts via the interface unit 310.
As shown in
The CPU 311 determines a detection voltage corresponding to a received diffuse reflection light amount, which is output from the light-receiving element 204 of the sensor unit 60, using a threshold to determine a boundary of each color portion, thereby detecting a relative misregistration amount between colors. In this case, since diffuse reflection light from the surface of the intermediate transfer belt 80 is small, when a detection region of the sensor unit 60 does not include any detection pattern, a low detection voltage is output from the light-receiving element 204. In this state, when a yellow portion in
Therefore, the detection voltage of the light-receiving element 204 at the time of detection of the color portion of the detection pattern 206 has to be higher than the threshold. Also, the detection voltage of the light-receiving element 204 at the time of detection of the black portion has to be lower than the threshold.
Also, at the time of density control, the CPU 311 determines densities using specular reflection light received by the light-receiving element 205 of the sensor unit 60 and diffuse reflection light received by the light-receiving element 204. In this case, when the output from the light-receiving element 204 or an A/D converter upon converting the output into digital data suffers saturation, density detection fails. Therefore, an upper limit value of the detection voltage free from any saturation, that is, an upper limit value that can be received by the light-receiving element 204 has to be decided, so that the detection voltage of the light-receiving element 204 is less than the upper limit value, as shown in
For example, when the detection voltage of the light-receiving element 204 does not exceed the threshold due to the low density of the color portion and the small light amount of the light-emitting element 203, the CPU 311 can no longer detect a position of the detection pattern 206. Also, when the detection voltage of the light-receiving element 204 at the detection timing of the black portion does not fall below the threshold due to the low density of the black portion and the large light amount of the light-emitting element 203, the CPU 311 can no longer detect the position of the detection pattern 206. Furthermore, when the detection voltage of the light-receiving element 204 at the detection timing of the detection pattern 207 saturates due to the large light amount of the light-emitting element 203, the density can no longer be detected.
The misregistration detection pattern 206 is normally formed to have a maximum density. However, since the surface state of the toner image of the detection pattern 206 is not uniform, the diffuse reflection light varies. Hence, in consideration of such variation, a minimum voltage value of the color portion to be detected by the light-receiving element 204 and a maximum voltage value of the black portion to be detected are calculated first by starting the correction control. In this case, if the calculated voltage values satisfy the following conditions, a position detection failure can be prevented.
Minimum voltage value at detection timing of color portion>threshold (1)
Maximum voltage value at detection timing of black portion<threshold (2)
Likewise, a maximum voltage value of the density detection pattern 207 to be detected by the light-receiving element 204 is obtained by measurement. In this case, if the obtained voltage value satisfies the following condition, a density detection failure can be prevented.
Maximum voltage value at detection timing of detection pattern 207<upper limit value of received light amount of light-receiving element 204 (3)
Note that at the time of density detection, maximum diffuse reflection light is obtained when a toner image of a maximum density is formed, and since the misregistration detection pattern 206 is formed to have the maximum density, the condition given by inequality (3) can be replaced by:
Maximum voltage value at detection timing of color portion<upper limit value of received light amount of light-receiving element 204 (4)
A method of changing the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 to meet inequalities (1), (2), and (4) will be described below with reference to
Likewise, a point 615 indicates a maximum voltage value of the black portion detected by the sensor unit 60 when the light-emitting element 203 is set to have an arbitrary measurement light amount. A line 612 which connects the points 616 and 615 represents the relationship between the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 and the maximum voltage value of the sensor unit 60 at the detection timing of the black portion. From inequality (2), the light-emitting element 203 can use a light amount when the line 612 is less than the threshold, but it cannot use a light amount when the line 612 becomes not less than the threshold. Therefore, the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 has to be smaller than at least that denoted by reference numeral 622. A light amount at the position denoted by reference numeral 622 will be referred to as a maximum light amount candidate hereinafter.
Furthermore, a point 613 indicates a maximum voltage value of the color portion detected by the sensor unit 60 when the light-emitting element 203 is set to have an arbitrary measurement light amount. A line 610 which connects the points 616 and 613 represents the relationship between the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 and the maximum voltage value of the sensor unit 60 at the detection timing of the color portion. From inequality (4), the light-emitting element 203 can use a light amount when the line 610 is less than an upper limit value, but it cannot use a light amount when the line 610 becomes not less than the upper limit value. Therefore, the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 has to be smaller than at least that denoted by reference numeral 620. A light amount at the position denoted by reference numeral 620 will be referred to as a maximum light amount candidate hereinafter.
Therefore, in case of the state shown in
With the aforementioned arrangement, the light-emitting amount of the light-emitting element 203 required to successively execute misregistration detection and density detection can be decided and set.
In the first embodiment, the light amount of the light-receiving element 203 is set based on the received light amount of the light-receiving element 204 for diffuse reflection light used in both misregistration and density detections. In this embodiment, a misregistration amount is decided based on the received light amount of specular reflection light received by the light-receiving element 205. Therefore, the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 is set using the received light amount of the light-receiving element 205 used in both control operations. Note that differences from the first embodiment will be mainly explained below, and a description of the same parts as in the first embodiment (for example, the arrangement of the image forming apparatus) will not be repeated.
In this embodiment, a detection pattern 206 shown in
Specular reflection light by the detection pattern 206 is smaller than that by the surface of the intermediate transfer belt 80, and becomes smaller with increasing density of the detection pattern 206. Therefore, as shown in
Also, as shown in
Specular reflection light from the intermediate transfer belt and detection patterns varies since the surface states of the intermediate transfer belt 80 and detection patterns are not uniform. Therefore, in consideration of such variation, a minimum voltage value of the intermediate transfer belt 80 and a maximum voltage value of the misregistration detection pattern 206, which are to be detected by the light-receiving element 205, are obtained by measurements. In this case, if the obtained voltage values satisfy the following conditions, a position detection failure can be prevented.
Minimum voltage value at detection timing of intermediate transfer belt surface>threshold (5)
Maximum voltage value at detection timing of detection pattern 206<threshold (6)
Likewise, a maximum voltage value of the density detection pattern 207 to be detected by the light-receiving element 205 is obtained by measurement. In this case, if the obtained voltage value satisfies the following condition, a density detection failure can be prevented.
Maximum voltage value at detection timing of detection pattern 207<upper limit value of received light amount of light-receiving element 205 (7)
Note that specular reflection light is maximized at the detection timing of the surface of the intermediate transfer belt 80 and, hence, the condition defined by inequality (7) can be replaced by:
Maximum voltage value at detection timing of intermediate transfer belt surface<upper limit value of received light amount of light-receiving element 205 (8)
A method of changing the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 so as to meet inequalities (5), (6), and (8) will be described below with reference to
Likewise, a point 915 indicates a maximum voltage value at the detection timing of the detection pattern 206 by the light-receiving element 205 when the light-emitting element 203 is set to have an arbitrary measurement light amount. A line 912 which connects the points 916 and 915 represents the relationship between the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 and the maximum voltage value at the time of detection of the detection pattern 206. From inequality (6), the light-emitting element 203 can use a light amount when the line 912 is less than the threshold, but it cannot use a light amount when the line 912 is not less than the threshold. Therefore, the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 has to be smaller than at least a light amount denoted by reference numeral 922. The light amount at the position denoted by reference numeral 922 will be referred to as a maximum light amount candidate hereinafter.
Furthermore, a point 913 indicates a maximum voltage value at the detection timing of the surface of the intermediate transfer belt 80 by the light-receiving element 205 when the light-emitting element 203 is set to have an arbitrary measurement light amount. A line 910 which connects the points 916 and 913 represents the relationship between the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 and the maximum voltage value at the detection timing of the surface of the intermediate transfer belt 80. From inequality (8), the light-emitting element 203 can use a light amount when the line 913 is less than an upper limit value, but it cannot use a light amount when the line 913 is not less than the upper limit value. Therefore, the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 has to be set to be smaller than at least a light amount denoted by reference numeral 920. The light amount at the position denoted by reference numeral 920 will be referred to as a maximum light amount candidate hereinafter.
The CPU 311 sets smaller one of the maximum light amount candidates as a maximum light amount as in the first embodiment. Also, a light amount range which can be set in the light-emitting element 203 is a range which is larger than the minimum light amount and is less than the maximum light amount, as denoted by reference numeral 917. Note that in this embodiment, a middle light amount between the minimum and maximum light amounts is set as the light amount of the light-emitting element 203. However, an arbitrary light amount can be set as long as it falls within a range between the minimum and maximum light amounts.
With the aforementioned arrangement, the light-emitting amount of the light-emitting element 203 required to successively execute misregistration detection and density detection can be decided and set.
The first and second embodiments set the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 based on the received light amount of the light-receiving element 204 or 205. However, when the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 is changed using either one light-receiving element, the received light amount of the other light-receiving element is also changed. For example, the received light amount of the other light-receiving element may fall outside a received light range. In this embodiment, in the arrangement of the first embodiment, the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 is set in consideration of a detection voltage of the light-receiving element 205, that is, the received light amount of specular reflection light. Note that differences from the first embodiment will be mainly described below, and a description of the same parts as in the first embodiment (for example, the arrangement of the image forming apparatus) will not be repeated.
This embodiment sets the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 by adopting inequality (8) in the second embodiment as a condition in addition to those described by inequalities (1), (2), and (4) in the first embodiment.
A method of changing the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 so as to meet inequalities (1), (2), (4), and (8) will be described below with reference to
Referring to
Therefore, in case of the state shown in
With the aforementioned arrangement, the light-emitting amount of the light-emitting element 203 required to successively execute misregistration detection and density detection can be decided and set.
Note that in the respective embodiments, maximum and minimum values of detection voltages detected by the light-receiving elements 204 and 205 are obtained in consideration of variations of specular reflection light and diffuse reflection light. However, the present invention is not limited to this. That is, an arrangement which uses a single measurement value may be adopted. Alternatively, an arrangement which uses an average value or the like in place of maximum and minimum values of a plurality of times of measurement may be adopted.
In the first to third embodiments, the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 is set based on the received light amount of the light-receiving element 204 or 205. This embodiment will explain a method of making misregistration detection and density detection a success at the same time by changing a light-receiving sensitivity of the light-receiving element 204. Note that differences from the first embodiment will be mainly explained below, and a description of the same parts as in the first embodiment (for example, the arrangement of the image forming apparatus) will not be repeated.
In
Letting G be a sensitivity of the sensitivity adjustment unit 1408 at the time of measurement of the respective values shown in
Maximum voltage 613−dark voltage of light-receiving element 204=G·α1·X (9)
Minimum voltage 614−dark voltage of light-receiving element 204=G·α2·X (10)
Maximum voltage 615−dark voltage of light-receiving element 204=G·α3·X (11)
where α1 and α2 are coefficients which are decided by a reflectance of diffuse reflection light from the color portion and its variation, and α3 is a coefficient which is decided by a reflectance of diffuse reflection light from the black portion and its variation.
From equations (9) to (11), all of the difference values 1517, 1518, and 1519 are expressed as functions of the sensitivity G of the sensitivity adjustment unit 1408. In this embodiment, for example, by setting the sensitivity G to minimize a variance of the difference values 1517, 1518, and 1519, margins associated with misregistration detection and density detection are optimized. However, an arbitrary sensitivity G at which the maximum value 613 does not exceed the upper limit value, the minimum value 614 is larger than the threshold, and the maximum value 615 does not exceed the threshold can be used. That is, the sensitivity G at which all of the difference values 1517, 1518, and 1519 are not less than 0 can be used. Note that letting D1, D2, and D3 respectively be the difference values 1517, 1518, and 1519, and A be an average value of D1 to D3, the variance is given by:
((D1−A)2+(D2−A)2+(D3−A)2)/3
With the aforementioned arrangement, the sensitivity of the light-receiving element 204 required to successively execute misregistration detection and density detection can be decided and set. Note that when the light-receiving element 205 of specular reflection light is used in place of the light-receiving element 204 of diffuse reflection light, the sensitivity of the light-receiving element 205 is similarly adjusted to successively execute misregistration detection and density detection. That is, the sensitivity of the light-receiving element 205 can be controlled in place of the light-emitting amount control in the second embodiment.
In the fourth embodiment, the light-receiving sensitivity of the light-receiving element is changed. This embodiment also changes a threshold in addition to the light-receiving sensitivity of the light-receiving element, thus making misregistration detection and density detection a success at the same time. Note that differences from the fourth embodiment will be mainly explained below, and a description of the same parts as in the fourth embodiment (for example, the arrangement of the image forming apparatus) will not be repeated.
In
For example, when the maximum value 613 is less than the upper limit of the light-receiving element 204, the threshold need only be adjusted to fall within a range between the minimum value 614 and maximum value 615. Also, for example, when the maximum value 613 exceeds the upper limit value of the light-receiving element 204, or when it does not exceed the upper limit value but a margin is small, a sensitivity which can assure a sufficient margin is decided. After that, the CPU 311 calculates changes of the maximum value 615 and minimum value 614 at the decided sensitivity, and can decide a threshold falling within a range between the calculated maximum value 615 and minimum value 614. Note that in this case, for example, the light amount of the light-emitting element 203 is set to be constant.
With the aforementioned arrangement, the light-receiving sensitivity of the light-receiving element 204 required to successively execute misregistration detection and density detection, and the threshold required to detect the misregistration detection pattern 206 can be set.
Note that in the above embodiment, the sensitivity of the light-receiving element 204 of diffuse reflection light and the threshold are controlled. However, the present invention is not limited to this. That is, an arrangement which uses specular reflection light as in the second embodiment may be adopted. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the light-receiving element 204 and threshold are to be controlled. Alternatively, the light-emitting amount of the light-emitting element 203 and threshold can be controlled. That is, when the maximum value 613 in
Aspects of the present invention can also be realized by a computer of a system or apparatus (or devices such as a CPU or MPU) that reads out and executes a program recorded on a memory device to perform the functions of the above-described embodiments, and by a method, the steps of which are performed by a computer of a system or apparatus by, for example, reading out and executing a program recorded on a memory device to perform the functions of the above-described embodiments. For this purpose, the program is provided to the computer for example via a network or from a recording medium of various types serving as the memory device (for example, computer-readable medium).
While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-109929, filed on May 11, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2012-109929 | May 2012 | JP | national |