Patent Grant
8204412
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an electrophotographic image forming apparatus, and in particular, it relates to an image forming apparatus suitable for an image bearing member of high electrostatic capacitance.
2. Description of the Related Art
In recent years, electrophotographic copying machines or the like are expected to go into the printing market in accordance with the progress of techniques in the image forming apparatus. However, in order to enter the printing market in full scale, it is an essential requirement that the quality and stabilization of images be made much higher than the present ones.
Until today, various approaches to improve image quality have been actively carried out, and among those, an approach to an image bearing member is taken up. As an important factor to decide image quality, there is an electrostatic latent image formed on the image bearing member. The electrostatic latent image is formed by decaying an exposed part on the image bearing member, which has been charged to a dark potential VD by means of a primary charger, to a bright potential VL by laser exposure.
Here, a detailed explanation will be given to a general formation process of an electrostatic latent image.
That is, a charge generation layer 103, a charge transport layer 102, and a surface layer 101 are laminated on a support member 105 through an undercoat layer 104. The exposed light is absorbed in the charge generation layer 103 to produce charge carriers. The charge carriers thus produced are injected into the charge transport layer 2, so that they move in the charge transport layer 2 to neutralize the dark potential VD. As a result, the exposed part is decayed to the bright potential VL, whereby an electrostatic latent image is formed. In general, it is known that when the film thickness of the image bearing member is thick, the electrostatic latent image formed thereon is deteriorated. If the electrostatic latent image is deteriorated, dot reproducibility also gets worse, so it is of course impossible to obtain an image of high quality as desired.
Therefore, the thinning of the film thickness of the image bearing member is performed as one of the approaches to the image bearing member for high image or picture quality. According to the study of the inventors, it has been found that in order to achieve the dot reproducibility allowed in OPC, the film thickness should be equal to or less than 20 μm (hereinafter referred to as a thin film OPC).
On the other hand, an amorphous silicon photosensitive member (hereinafter referred to as α-Si photosensitive member) is taken up as another approach for high picture quality.
According to the study of the present inventors, it has been found that the film thickness should be 60 μm or less in order to achieve the dot reproducibility allowed in the α-Si photosensitive member. In addition, it has been found that the α-Si photosensitive member is very high in hardness as compared with the OPC, and hence has a sufficiently allowable level of durability as required in the printing market.
As described above, the thinning of the film thickness of the charge transport layer in the image bearing member and the use of the α-Si photosensitive member are picked up as approaches for high picture quality in the electrophotographic image forming apparatus. It can be said that among these approaches, the α-Si photosensitive member is capable of outputting pictures of high quality comparable to the printing level and at the same time has excellent durability as required in the printing market.
Here, note that as an image forming apparatus using an α-Si photosensitive member, there is one described in Patent Literature 1, for example.
However, the α-Si photosensitive member is liable to be subjected to a “charging defect” in which development is not terminated normally. Hereinafter, the “charging defect” will be discussed.
However, if the α-Si photosensitive member is used, the development is finished in a state where the charging potential has not fully filled out Vcont even at the time of termination of the development, as shown in
Now, reference will be made to the reason why the α-Si photosensitive member is liable to cause a charging defect. The charging potential generated by the latent image being developed by the toner is denoted as ΔVth in a theoretical sense, as shown by the following Equation 1.
In the above-mentioned Equation 1, dt denotes the height of a toner layer; dm denotes the film thickness of the image bearing member (the total film thickness except for the support member); Q/S denotes the amount or quantity of charge per unit area of the toner; ∈0 denotes the dielectric constant of a vacuum; ∈t denotes the dielectric constant of the toner layer; and ∈m denotes the relative dielectric constant of the image bearing member. Here, note that the individual units are represented in such a manner that the dimensions of Equation 1 may be consistent.
In Equation 1 above, the first term is a potential ΔVt which is created by the toner layer itself with respect to its surroundings; the second term is ΔVc created between the toner layer and a basic layer of the image bearing member by means of a capacitor effect. The sum of both of these terms becomes the potential generated upon development by the toner, i.e., the charging potential ΔVth. Here, note that ΔV is a measured value of the charging potential, and ΔVth is a theoretical value of the charging potential (i.e., a value derived from Equation 1).
In addition, the film thickness dm of the image bearing member indicates the actual film thickness of a photosensitive layer, and hence indicates the film thickness of the layer excluding the support member. Specifically, in case of the α-Si photosensitive member, the film thickness dm of the image bearing member is a film thickness that is the sum of the surface layer 111, the electric charge blocking layers 112, 114, and the charge generation layer 113 except for the support member 115 of
On the other hand, in the case of OPC, the film thickness dm of the image bearing member is a film thickness that is the sum of the surface layer 101, the charge transport layer 102, and the charge generation layer 103 except for the support member 105 and the undercoat layer 104 of
Here, note that in the case of using the α-Si photosensitive member for high picture quality, the relative dielectric constant of the α-Si photosensitive member becomes about three times as large as that of OPC. In other words, the electrostatic capacitance per unit area C/S (=∈0∈m/dm) of the α-Si photosensitive member becomes about three times as large as that of OPC with the same film thickness. If the electrostatic capacitance is large, ΔVc in the second term of Equation 1 decreases, from the relation of Q=CV, even if the toner with the same quantity of charge is developed.
For this reason, the α-Si photosensitive member is liable to cause a charging defective. The same is true for the thin film OPC. The thin film OPC has a film thickness thinner than a conventional one, and hence has a larger electrostatic capacitance than that with the conventional film thickness. Thus, ΔVc becomes lower, resulting in that defective charging may be easily caused.
The reasons for this will be described below. For the α-Si photosensitive member, development has not been terminated normally due to defective charging. In other words, for the electrostatic latent image, the development has been terminated with sufficient energy for developing the toner being left. Therefore, the amount of developer can be varied greatly by a change in the electric field strength due to fluctuation of the SD gap, etc.
On the contrary, in case that development has been terminated normally as with OPC, there is a limited amount of energy for development left, so the change of the amount of developer is small even if the electric field strength should change. Therefore, it has been found that the stability of the amount of developed toner is extremely decreased by the defective charging resulting from providing high electrostatic capacitance. In the printing market, it is required that all the output pictures have high picture quality and at the same time the same picture quality. In other words, it is required that the amount of toner, which decides the density of image to be obtained, do not change for all the output images. To achieve this, it is essential to solve the above-mentioned defective charging.
Accordingly, by changing the film thickness of the OPC to 30 μm, 25 μm, 20 μm, respectively, the resultant charging rates measured were 100% (for 30 μm), 90% (for 25 μm), and 75% (for 20 μm), respectively. At this time, from the above-mentioned measurements, it was found that with respect to a fluctuation of 100 μm of the SD gap, the changes of the amount of developer were small for the film thickness of 30 μm (i.e., charging rate of 100%), and for the film thickness of 25 μm (i.e., charging rate of 90%), and hence were within the allowable level of stability. According to the above-mentioned technical reasons, the charging efficiency should be 90% or more.
In order to cope with the above-mentioned increased electrostatic capacitance of the image bearing member, a variety of attempts have been made to improve defective charging.
In order to solve defective charging for the above-mentioned increased electrostatic capacitance of the image bearing member, previously, it has been made to use a development bias which made a toner fly to the image bearing member from the developer carrying member actively.
However, the use of such development bias caused the another problem what is called “fog” to which a toner adheres also to a non-image part other than an image part.
Therefore, the image forming apparatus of not causing the problem of the fog, either is desired, raising a charging rate.
In view of the above, an object of the present invention is to provide an image forming apparatus in which, upon use of an image bearing member of high electrostatic capacitance, is capable of solving the problem of defective charging without deteriorating a fog thereby to make high picture quality and high stability compatible with each other.
Bearing the above object in mind, an image forming apparatus according to the present invention includes:
an image bearing member that bears an electrostatic image thereon;
a charging device that charges the image bearing member;
an exposure device that forms the electrostatic image by exposing a surface of the image bearing member, which has been charged to a dark potential VD by means of the charging device, thereby to change the image bearing member surface into a bright potential VL;
a developing device that has a developer carrying member on which a developer including a toner and a magnetic carrier is carried; and
a power supply that applies a developing bias on the developer carrying member;
wherein the developing bias is an oscillating voltage having a first peak voltage V1 generating electrostatic force in a first direction to cause the toner to move in a direction from the developer carrying member toward the image bearing member, and a second peak voltage V2 generating electrostatic force in a second direction to cause the toner to move in a direction from the image bearing member toward the developer carrying member, the first and second peak voltages being applied on the developer carrying member in an alternate manner;
a duty ratio Du (%), denoted by (T2/(T1+T2))×100, is between 60 and 80 (i.e., 60≦Du≦80), where T1 is a phase time in the first direction, and T2 is a phase time in the second direction;
the magnetic carrier has a characteristic that:
the magnetic carrier has a resistivity ρ which decreases in accordance with an increasing electric field strength, and a relative dielectric constant ∈ which increases in accordance with an increasing electric field strength;
a product of a time constant ∈0∈ρ(s) of electric charge decay, which is denoted by a dielectric constant of a vacuum ∈0, the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier, and the resistivity ρ in an electric field strength E2D decided by the second peak voltage V2 and the dark potential VD, and the electric field strength E2D satisfies a relation of 20≦∈0∈ρ E2D (s·V/CM); and
the time constant ∈0∈ρ(s) and the relative dielectric constant E in an electric field strength E1L, which is decided by the first peak voltage V1 and the bright potential VL, satisfy the following relations: ∈0∈ρ(s)≦6.0×10−4, and 30≦∈.
By using the magnetic carrier and duty bias under a predetermined condition, it is satisfied both a required level of fog and a required level of charging rate.
Further features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
Now, the present invention will be described in detail below based on illustrated preferred embodiments thereof.
In this example, the image forming apparatus is in the form of a laser beam printer of a digitalized image exposure type and a reversal development type, but it includes laser beam printers of a background exposure type, a normal development type, and so on, all of which are encompassed by the scope of the appended claims of the present invention.
A reference numeral 1 denotes a drum type electrophotographic photosensitive member which acts as an image bearing member. In order to improve dot reproducibility, it is effective to make a charge density on the surface of the image bearing member high. So this image bearing member 1 has a high electrostatic capacitance, and in particular, an electrostatic capacitance per unit area (C/S) of 1.5×10−6 (F/m2) or higher (i.e., C/S≧1.5×10−6 (F/m2)). In order to achieve allowable dot reproducibility, it is required that an α-Si photosensitive member have a film thickness of 60 μm or less, and that a thin film OPC have a film thickness of 20 μm or less. At this time, a lower limit of an electrostatic capacitance per unit area (C/S) (=∈0∈m/dm) is 1.5×10−6 (F/m2) (i.e., C/S=1.5×10−6 (F/m2)) For the purpose of obtaining high picture quality, it is preferable to satisfy the above-mentioned condition (C/S≦1.5×10−6 (F/m2)). Therefore, since the larger a value of C/S is, the better a dot reproducibility becomes, in the viewpoint of dot reproducibility, there is no upper limit for the value of C/S.
However, in case of a value of C/S is increase, defective charging is liable to be caused, as stated above. Then, due to defective charging, the stability of development is reduced to an extreme extent.
In this example, the image bearing member 1 is an amorphous silicon photosensitive member (α-Si photosensitive member). The α-Si photosensitive member is basically provided with a photosensitive layer including amorphous silicon on a conductive substrate body. The photosensitive layer is formed of an amorphous silicon-based material such as Si, SiC, SiO, SiON, or the like. The photosensitive layer is formed, for instance, by means of a glow discharge decomposition method, a sputtering method, an ECR method, a deposition method, or the like.
The image bearing member 1 is driven to rotate at a predetermined speed in a clockwise direction denoted by arrow r, and has a surface which is uniformly charged to a predetermined dark potential VD by means of a primary charger (charging device) 2. 2a denotes a charging bias power supply for the primary charger 2. 3 denotes a laser scanner (laser exposure device) which acts as a digitalized exposure unit. A time series electric digital pixel signal is input to the scanner 3 from a host apparatus 11 such as an image scanner.
That is, in the host apparatus 11, an image signal acquired by a CCD or the like is digitalized by an A/D converter, and is then sent to a signal processing unit where it is converted into a binary image signal corresponding to the density of an image.
This image signal is sent to the scanner 3. The scanner 3 has a laser driver, a laser, a rotary polygon mirror, a mirror, and so on, and the image signal is input to the laser driver. The laser driver modulates the light emission of the laser in accordance with the image signal input thereto.
The dark potential surface of the image bearing member 1 is subjected to scanning exposure L (image exposure) by the modulated laser beam. The dark potential VD of the exposed portion decays to a bright potential VL, so that an electrostatic latent image is formed. An image exposure method is a method in which a portion of an image bearing member to which a toner is to be adhered at the time of development is pre-exposed, and a bright potential portion of the image bearing member is developed by the toner.
Numeral 4 denotes a developing device that develops the electrostatic latent image formed on the surface of the image bearing member 1 as a toner image. The developing device 4 of this example is a reversal development device that uses, as a developer, a two-component developer A comprising a magnetic carrier and a non-magnetic toner. The ratio by weight between the toner and the carrier is adjusted to a predetermined value. The developer A is received in a developing container 4a, and is stirred by a stirring member 4b, so that the toner is friction-charged to a negative polarity. The developer A is supplied to a developing sleeve 4c, which act as a developer carrying member.
The developing sleeve 4c is driven to rotate at a predetermined speed in a counterclockwise direction denoted by an arrow. In the developing sleeve 4c, there is arranged a magnet roller 4d which is composed of a magnetic material and which has a plurality of magnetic poles. The developer A supplied to the developing sleeve 4c is carried, as a magnetic brush layer, on the surface of the developing sleeve 4c by the magnetic force of the magnet roller 4d, and is conveyed in accordance with the rotation of the developing sleeve 4c. The developer A is conveyed to a development region in which the developing sleeve 4c and the image bearing member 1 are arranged in opposition to each other, with the layer thickness of the developer A being restricted by a blade 4e in the course of conveyance thereof.
A predetermined developing bias is applied on the developing sleeve 4c by means of a developing bias applying power supply 4f. By the application of this developing bias, a developing electric field is generated in the development region, whereby the toner adhered to the carrier is pulled away from the carrier, and the electrostatic latent image on the image bearing member 1 is reversely developed by the negative carrier. In the reversal development method, the polarity to which the image bearing member is charged by the charger is the same as the charging polarity of the toner.
The developer magnetic brush layer supplied for development in the development region is conveyed back into the developing container 4a in accordance with the continued rotation of the developing sleeve 4c, so that it is magnetically stripped off from the surface of the developing sleeve 4c. Then, a fresh developer is supplied to the developing sleeve 4c. The toner density of the developer A in the developing container 4a decreases as the toner in the developer A is consumed by development. To compensate for this, the toner density of the developer A in the developing container 4a is observed by means of an unillustrated sensor. When the toner density of the developer A has decreased to an allowable lower limit density, an operation to replenish an appropriate amount of toner in a replenishment toner container 4g to the developer A in the developing container 4a is carried out in an intermittent manner. As a result, the toner density of the developer A in the developing container 4a is kept within a predetermined range.
The toner image formed on the image bearing member 1 is successively transferred, by means of a transfer device in the form of a transfer charger 5, to a recording material (transfer material) P such as a sheet of paper, which is fed from an unillustrated sheet feeding part to the opposed portions of the image bearing member 1 and the transfer charger 5 at predetermined control timing. A transfer bias of a positive polarity opposite to the charging polarity of the toner is applied from a transfer bias applying power supply 5a to the transfer charger 5 at predetermined control timing. As a result, the toner image on the image bearing member 1 is electrostatically transferred to a surface of the recording material P.
The recording material P having passed the transfer device in the form of the transfer charger 5 is separated from the surface of the image bearing member 1, so that it is introduced into a fixing device 8. The fixing device 8 fixes the unfixed toner image on the recording material P as a permanent fixed image under the action of heat and pressure, and then discharges the recording material P. The image bearing member 1 after separation of the recording material P is wiped by a cleaning blade 6a of a cleaner 6 so that residual attachments such as transfer residual toner is removed. In addition, the image bearing member 1 is further discharged by being subjected to entire surface exposure by means of a pre-exposure device 7, so that it can be used for image formation in a repeated manner.
Numeral 9 denotes a control circuit part (control unit). This control circuit part 9 controls processing of signals input from a variety of process equipment of the image forming apparatus, and command signals to the variety of process equipment, as well as prescribed imaging sequence processing. The apparatus is controlled according to control programs and reference tables stored in a ROM.
Numeral 10 is an operation panel. Various image formation conditions are input from this operation panel 10 to the control circuit part 9. In addition, various information is input from the control circuit part 9 to the operation panel 10 and is displayed on a display part.
Reference will be made to a method for measuring the electrostatic capacitance (C/S) of the image bearing member used in the present study. A planar exposure plate having a layer construction similar to that of an actual photosensitive layer (including a charge generation layer, an electric charge blocking layer, and a surface layer) formed on a metal substrate was prepared, and electrodes being smaller than the exposure plate was placed into contact with the exposure plate. An amount of charge q accumulated in the photosensitive layer was obtained by monitoring a current flowing through the electrodes when each DC voltage, 200V, 400V, 600V, 800V, or 1000V, was applied on the electrodes, and integrating a current curve obtained with respect to time.
By performing this with the value of the DC voltage being varied, the electrostatic capacitance (C) of the exposure plate was obtained from the amount of charge q and the slope of the voltage value V. At this time, the electrostatic capacitance (C/S) per unit area was obtained from the area (S) of the electrodes used.
Next, reference will be made to a method for measuring the film thickness dm and the relative dielectric constant ∈m of the image bearing member used in the present study. The film thickness dm of the photosensitive layer was obtained by measuring the thickness of the photosensitive plate before and after formation of the photosensitive layer thereon by means of a film thickness meter, and calculating a difference between the measurements. In addition, the relative dielectric constant cm was obtained by assigning the values thus obtained to the electrostatic capacitance (C/S) and the film thickness (dm) in the following theoretical equation: ∈m=(C·dm)/(S·∈0)).
Now, reference will be made to a “charging efficiency” introduced in the following verification for numeric conversion of the level of defective charging. The charging efficiency is a ratio of charging potential ΔV with respect to a development contrast Vcont as shown in Equation 3. Here, the development contrast Vcont is a potential difference between a DC component of the developing bias and a bright potential VL of that portion of the image bearing member which is to be formed into an image part.
ΔV denotes a potential difference between a surface potential of a toner layer after a latent image potential part has been developed and a latent image potential before development. That is, ΔV of a portion of the image bearing member corresponding to a solid image portion is a potential difference between a toner layer surface potential after development of a bright potential portion, which is a portion of the image bearing member corresponding to the solid image portion, and a bright potential before development of the portion of the image bearing member corresponding to the solid image portion. The potentials such as the bright potential, the toner layer potential, etc., were measured at or in the vicinity of the position of development by means of a surface potential meter. The surface potential meter used for measurement is MODEL 347 manufactured by TREC INC.
Charging efficiency=Charging potential ΔV/Developing contrast×100 Equation 3
Reference will be made to a method for measuring the charging efficiency.
First of all, an empty developing device 4 with no two-component developer A contained therein was prepared, and a surface potential (latent image potential before development) on the image bearing member 1, which has not been developed by toner, after charging and formation of a latent image, is measured by means of a surface potential meter 12 which is arranged right under the developing device.
Then, the developing device 4 containing the two-component the developer A therein is prepared, and a toner image is actually formed on the image bearing member 1 by applying a developing bias thereon after charging and formation of a latent image. The potential on the surface of the image bearing member immediately after development (latent image potential after development) is similarly measured by the surface potential meter 12.
Of course, Vcont is decided at the position of development. Specifically, a dedicated surface potential meter is arranged at the position of the developing device 4, and the potential of the latent image at the position of development is measured, whereby Vdc is decided with respect to the latent image potential, thus ensuring Vcont at the position of development.
Reference will be made to a method for measuring the resistivity ρ and the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier.
Then, on the above-mentioned conditions an AC voltage (sine wave) from which a pressure value differs mutually is applied each between the AI drum 201 and the developing sleeve 231 by means of a power supply 204 (HVA4321 manufactured by NF Company) while rotating the Al drum 201 and the developing sleeve 231 at the predetermined peripheral speed. At this time, the plural AC voltage values are set up suitably within the limits from which the electric-field boundary two or more of these pressure values want to investigate the electric-field dependency of the impedance of a container is acquired. At this time, impedance can be measured by measuring a response current to the applied voltage and sweeping the frequency of the sine wave from 1 Hz to 10 kHz.
In the present invention, sweeping the frequency of the sine wave and measurements of impedance were made automatically by the use of a dielectric measurement system 205 (126096W) manufactured by Solartron Metrology, a British company.
An analysis method will be described. An equivalent circuit is derived from a Cole-Cole plot that plots individual measurements (Re(Z), Ima(Z)) obtained by sweeping the frequency from 1 Hz to 10 kHz (see
From this, it is suggested that the equivalent circuit of the magnetic carrier be a parallel circuit when the Cole-Cole plot is a semicircle as shown in
Here, note that an electrostatic capacitance Ct obtained according to the above-mentioned analysis method includes an influence due to an air layer (relative dielectric constant of 1) outside the development region (hereinafter referred to as a development nip) in the developing sleeve 231 and the Al drum 201. In other words, to obtain the electrostatic capacitance C of the magnetic carrier 202, it is necessary to subtract an electrostatic capacitance Ca due to the air layer outside the development nip from the electrostatic capacitance Ct obtained according to the above-mentioned analysis method.
Reference will be made to a method for deriving the electrostatic capacitance Ca. The empty developing device 203 containing no magnetic carrier 202 therein is measured by the above-mentioned measuring method. An electrostatic capacitance Cat obtained according to the above-mentioned analysis method is a combined value of an electrostatic capacitance Can due to an air layer inside the development nip and the electrostatic capacitance Ca due to the air space outside the development nip. The electrostatic capacitance Can can be obtained from the relative dielectric constant (∈=1) of the air layer, the SD gap (cm), and a contact area (cm2) of the magnetic carrier with respect to the Al drum 1. Ca can be derived from Cat and Can thus obtained (i.e., Ca=Cat−Can). Finally, the electrostatic capacitance C of the magnetic carrier is decided as follows: C=Ct−Ca.
The resistivity ρ(Ω·cm) and the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier 202 for the resistance R and the electrostatic capacitance C of the magnetic carrier 202 obtained by the above-mentioned analysis method were obtained from the SD gap (cm) and the contact area (cm2) of the magnetic carrier 202 with respect to the Al drum 201, respectively.
Here, note that the relative dielectric constant ∈ and the resistivity ρ of the magnetic carrier in the appended claims of this application use the values obtained according to the above-mentioned measuring method. In other words, the relative dielectric constant ∈ and the resistivity ρ of the magnetic carrier used in the appended claims of this application are not the values of the physical properties of the single magnetic carrier, but represent the relative dielectric constant ∈ and the resistivity ρ including the magnetic carrier and the air layer lying in the development nip.
In addition, the resistivity ρ and the relative dielectric constant ∈ obtained by the above-mentioned measuring method do not take the toner into consideration. The individual physical property values of the two-component developer actually mixed with the toner can be expected to be different from those obtained according to the above method. However, it is considered that the influence of the toner on the individual physical property values in the development nip is limited because under the application of the developing bias, the toner is continuously moving between the magnetic carrier and the image bearing member. Accordingly, when the resistivity ρ and the dielectric constant ∈ are specified in the present invention, the toner is not taken into consideration.
Reference will be made to a method for measuring the field strength dependence of the resistivity ρ and the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier. The electric field strength dependency of the resistivity ρ and the relative dielectric constant ∈ can be measured by sweeping the amplitude of the sine wave applied by the power supply 204 of
Examples of measurements are illustrated in
The electric field strength under the application of the developing bias is decided as follows.
For example, in case where the developing bias is such as shown in
In this first example, chargeability and fog were measured under fixed image output conditions for magnetic carriers having different values of physical properties (∈, ρ)
The result of verification will be described. Development was carried out according to a digital image exposure method and a reversal development method by using, as a machine to be studied, the above-mentioned modified machine of a model IRC-6800 (a form of composite copying machine manufactured by Canon Inc.).
An image bearing member used here was an α-Si photosensitive member having a film thickness dm of 30 μm, a relative dielectric constant cm of 10, and an electrostatic capacitance per unit area C/S of 3.0×10−6 (F/m2). The film thickness dm, the electrostatic capacitance per unit area C/S, and the relative dielectric constant ∈m were measured according to the above-mentioned measuring method (2).
As shown in
The distance (SD gap) between the developing sleeve 4c and the image bearing member 1 was 300 μm.
The developing bias used at this time has a waveform including a DC component and an AC component which is superposed on the DC component, as shown in
The electric field strengths E1L, E2D in the pull-back direction and in the developing direction decided by the developing bias, the bright potential VL, and the dark potential VD were as follows: E1L=3.7×104 [V/cm], and E2D=2.6×104 [V/cm]. Vdc, being a DC component, serves to ensure a necessary development contrast (200 V) and a necessary fog removing potential (150 V) for an electrostatic latent image on the image bearing member, i.e., the bright potential VL (−130 V) corresponding to the solid portion and the dark potential VD (−480 V). Therefore, a study was carried out by setting the DC component Vdc to −330 V (i.e., Vdc=−330 V). Here, the development contrast is a difference between the DC component Vdc and the bright potential VL, and the fog removing potential is a difference between the DC component Vdc and the dark potential VD.
Here, note that in this study, the frequency of the developing bias was 5 kHz, but it is preferable that the frequency be in a range of 3 kHz-8 kHz. According to the inventors' study, it has been found that when the frequency is less than 3 kHz, fog does not reach the allowable level under any condition, and when the frequency is higher than 8 kHz, chargeability does not reach the allowable level under any condition.
Next, reference will be made to a developer used in the present invention.
A two-component developer including a non-magnetic toner and a magnetic carrier was used as a developer. A toner produced according to a well-known conventional grinding method was used as a non-magnetic toner used. On the other hand, three kinds of carriers having different values of physical properties (∈, ρ) were prepared as a magnetic carrier used. Individual features of the carries will be specifically described.
High Dielectric Constant Carrier (Low Electric Resistance) A:
As a high dielectric constant (low electric resistance) carrier A, there is listed, for example, one using, as a core material, magnetite and ferrite that have magnetism and are denoted by the following formula (1) or (2).
MO.Fe2O3 (1)
M.Fe2O4 (2)
where M denotes a trivalent, divalent, or univalent metal ion.
As M, there are listed Be, Mg, Ca, Rb, Sr, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, and Zr, Nb, Mo, Cd, Pb, and Li, which can be used singularly or in combinations.
As specific compounds of the above-mentioned metallic compound particles having magnetism, there are listed, for example, ferrous oxides such as Cu—Zn—Fe-based ferrite, Mn—Mg—Fe-based ferrite, Mn—Mg—Sr—Fe-based ferrite, Li—Fe-based ferrite and so on.
Any well-known methods can be adopted as a method for producing ferrite particles. For example, there can be listed the following methods.
That is, a ferrite composition crushed to submicrometer size is mixed with a binder, water, a dispersing agent and so on, and is then formed into particles by the use of a spray dryer process or a flow granulation process.
Thereafter, the particles thus formed are baked at a temperature in the range of 700-1,400 degrees C., preferably 800-1,300 degrees C., in a rotary kiln or a batch kiln. Subsequently, the baked particles are sieve classified so as to control the particle size distribution thereof in an appropriate manner, whereby core material particles for the carrier are provided.
In addition, the surface of each ferrite particle is coated with a silicone resin or like other material at a level of about 0.1-1.0 mass %. Here, the magnetic carrier prepared in this manner is called the high dielectric constant carrier A.
Low Dielectric Constant (High Electric Resistance) Carrier B:
As a low dielectric constant carrier B, there are listed, for example, the following ones.
A first one uses, as a core material, a magnetic material dispersed resin carrier that is produced by melting, mixing, and crushing magnetite particles and a thermoplastic resin.
A second one uses, as a core material, a magnetic material dispersed resin carrier that is produced by spray-drying a slurry, which is formed by melting and dispersing magnetite particles and a thermoplastic resin in a solvent, by means of a spray dryer or the like.
A third one uses, as a core material, a magnetic material dispersed resin carrier that is produced by reaction-hardening phenol through direct polymerization under the presence of magnetite particles and hematite particles.
In addition, these carrier core materials thus produced are further coated with a resin such as a thermoplastic resin, etc., at a level of about 1.0-4.0 mass % by means of a fluidized bed coating device or the like. Here, the magnetic carriers produced in these manners are called the low dielectric constant carrier B.
Carrier C According to the Present Invention:
On the other hand, as the carrier C according to the present invention, there can be used, for example, a porous resin-filled carrier which is produced by pouring a resin such as a silicone resin into a porous core to fill pores or voids therein.
As a method for producing the carrier C, there can be listed the following methods.
First, iron (ferric or ferrous) oxide (Fe2O3) and one or two or more kinds of metal oxides chosen from a group comprising Ni, Cu, Zn, Li, Mg, Mn, Sr, Ca and Ba, as used in the above-mentioned high dielectric constant carrier A, are weighed in predetermined amounts, respectively, and are mixed with one another.
Then, the mixture thus obtained is calcinated at a temperature in the range of 700-1,000 degrees C. for period of 5 hours, and is thereafter crushed into particles having a particle size of about 0.3-3 μm. A binder, water, and a dispersing agent, together with organic particulates and a pore or void forming agent such as Na2CO3 as necessary, are added to the crushed mixture thus obtained, which is then spray-dried by a spray dryer under a heating atmosphere in the temperature range of 100-200 degrees C. to form granules having a size in the range of about 20-50 μm.
Thereafter, the granules thus obtained are baked or sintered in an atmosphere of an inert gas (e.g., N2 gas, etc.) having an oxygen concentration of 5% or less at a sintering temperature in the range of 800-1,400 degrees C. for a period of 8-12 hours. As a result, a porous core is obtained. Subsequently, a silicone resin is filled into the porous core at a level of 8-15 mass % in a decompressed state by means of a dipping process, and then the silicone resin thus filled is solidified under an inert gas atmosphere at a temperature in the range of 180-220 degrees C. In addition, in case of need, the porous core thus filled with the silicone resin is further coated with a resin such as a thermosetting resin at a level of about 0.1-5.0 mass % by means of the dipping process.
In the above-mentioned production method, the relative dielectric constant ∈ and the resistivity ρ of the carrier can be controlled by controlling the porous degree (porosity) of the core and the resistance of the core material as well as the amount of resin such as silicone resin to be filled, the amount of resin of the coating resin, and so on.
Next, in the image forming apparatus using such a carrier, the studying result which inventors performed in order to improve charge nature and fog is shown below.
First, as an effective measure in order to improve a charging rate, a method of controlling the movement of toner by means of a developing bias that is generated by an oscillating voltage was discussed. Specifically, as shown in
The prevent such duty wave serves to weaken a pull-back force which acts to pull back the toner in the direction of the developer carrying member in the phase time T2, so the toner is localized in the vicinity of the image bearing member. As a result, the amount of the toner to be finally developed on the image bearing member increases, and hence defective charging can be improved.
According to the result of the study by the inventors, it has been found that when the duty ratio Du is in the range from 60% to 80%, a sufficient advantage can be obtained without regard to the types of the carrier and the frequency of the developing bias in comparison with the rectangular wave.
Meanwhile, if the peak voltage V2 is weakened as shown in the duty wave, the adhesion of the toner to a non-image part (hereinafter referred to as a fog) will of course be deteriorated. In addition, according to the study of the inventors, it has also been found that an image bearing member of high electrostatic capacitance is liable to deteriorate the fog because the weakly charged toner becomes liable to be adhered to the non-image part by a strong mirroring force in comparison with an image bearing member of low electrostatic capacitance.
It was found that the fog is deteriorated dramatically in accordance with the raising or increasing duty ratio Du, as illustrated in this figure. Here, the following method was used for converting the fog into numeric values. The reflection density Ds of a white ground portion (non-image part) of an image was measured by means of a reflection densitometer (SERISE 1200) manufactured by GretagMacbeth. On the other hand, the reflection density Dr of paper itself was similarly measured, and the density of the fog was defined as fog density (%)=Dr−Ds.
As described above, for the image bearing member of high electrostatic capacitance, defective charging was remarkably improved by the duty wave, which, however, was not compatible with improvements in the fog only by the duty wave.
Accordingly, the inventors have studied further various schemes for improving a fog when a duty wave to be expected to improve the charging rate is used. As the most effective among such schemes, there is especially a method for increasing the resistance of a magnetic carrier to be used to higher values.
The reason why the fog can be improved is considered as follows.
The magnetic carrier can be generally considered to be an RC parallel circuit comprising a resistance component R and a capacitance component C. The magnetic carrier is charged or electrified by friction with the tone, whereby an electric charge Qc (hereinafter a counter charge) having a polarity opposite to that of the toner charge is stored in the capacitance component of the magnetic carrier. At this time, it is considered that the counter charge decays at a time constant of ∈ρ, as shown in Equation 2.
Qc(t)=Q0exp(−t/∈0∈ρ) Equation 2
where Q0 denotes an initial counter charge.
According to the study of the inventors, it has been verified that the fog has a correlation to the product of a time constant ∈0∈ρ (s) of electric charge decay, which is denoted by a relative dielectric constant ∈ and a resistivity ρ of the magnetic carrier in a field strength E2D in a phase in which the toner is caused to move to the developer carrying member, and the field strength E2D.
The reason for this is considered as follows.
The counter charge required to collect the weakly charged fog toner with the magnetic carrier adhered to the non-image part is assumed to be q. At this time, a period of time t (hereinafter simply referred to as time t) for which the magnetic carrier has an electric charge of q or more is obtained from Equation 2 above.
t=−∈0∈ρ log(q′),
where q′=q/Q0.
It is considered that the level of the fog results from the time t and the field strength E2D that acts to cause the toner to move in a direction to the developer carrying member. Thus, it is considered that the fog and ∈0 ∈ρ E2D are in correlation with each other for the above reason.
The reason why the fog is improved by setting the resistance (ρ) of the magnetic carrier to a high value is considered as follows. That is, ∈0∈ρ of the magnetic carrier is increased to lengthen the time for which the magnetic carrier holds a necessary amount of counter charge. The weakly charged fog toner adhered to the non-image part is collected by the remaining counter charge, whereby the fog is improved.
However, according to the study of the inventors, it is discovered that the chargeability is deteriorated only by setting the electric resistance of the magnetic carrier to high values in order to improve the fog.
On the other hand,
In accordance with the increasing electric resistance of the magnetic carrier, ∈0∈ρ (s) increases, so that the counter charge becomes liable to remain on the magnetic carrier. Therefore, it is considered that the toner is pulled back to the magnetic carrier by the counter charge of the magnetic carrier, thus resulting in deterioration in the chargeability.
In addition, according to the study of the inventors, it has been verified that the relative dielectric constant of the magnetic carrier itself exerts an influence on the chargeability. Specifically, the chargeability of a magnetic carrier having a small relative dielectric constant is lower than that of a magnetic carrier having a large relative dielectric constant. This can be explained by likening a developing sleeve and an image bearing member to a pair of parallel plates.
When a voltage is applied on the parallel plates, the electric field between the parallel plates becomes uniform. On the other hand, when a dielectric substance is put between the parallel plates, the electric field around the dielectric substance between the parallel plates will be distorted greatly by the boundary condition thereof. Therefore, the electric field applied to the surroundings of the dielectric substance obtained from the equipotential surfaces increases in accordance with the increasing dielectric constant of the dielectric substance.
In other words, it is considered that when there is the magnetic carrier between the developing sleeve and the image bearing member, the larger the dielectric constant of the magnetic carrier, the larger the electric field applied to the surroundings of the magnetic carrier becomes, so the toner becomes more liable to fly easily from the magnetic carrier. On the other hand, the smaller the dielectric constant of the magnetic carrier, the toner becomes less prone to fly from the magnetic carrier, as a result of which the chargeability is deteriorated.
As stated above, it is considered that if the electric resistance of the magnetic carrier is made higher in order to repress the fog, the chargeability is deteriorated due to the influence of the counter charge and the dielectric constant of the magnetic carrier on the electric field.
Thus, it is difficult to make the improvement of fog and the improvement of chargeability in the image bearing member of high electrostatic capacitance compatible with each other due to only use the carrier A or carrier B for the image forming apparatus using duty bias.
Then, as a result of studying by the inventors, it succeeded in finding out the constitution which can aim at coexistence of the improvement of fog and the improvement of chargeability by using the carrier C and the duty bias of point described above under predetermined conditions.
In case of the high dielectric constant carrier A, the resistivity ρ thereof was decreased and the relative dielectric constant ∈ thereof was increased, in accordance with the increasing electric field strength. In case of the low dielectric constant carrier B, the changes of both the resistivity ρ and the relative dielectric constant ∈ thereof in accordance with the increasing electric field strength were very limited. On the other hand, in case of the carrier C according to the present invention, the rates of changes of the resistivity ρ and the relative dielectric constant ∈ thereof in accordance with the increasing electric field strength were small until near a predetermined electric field strength, i.e., an electric field strength of 2.6×104 (V/cm) in this example. However, when the electric field strength of 2.6×104 (V/cm) was exceeded, the degree of decrease (decrease rate) of the resistivity ρ became larger in accordance with the increasing field strength, so the resistivity ρ decreased rapidly, whereas the degree of increase (increase rate) of the relative dielectric constant ∈ became larger, so the relative dielectric constant ∈ increased rapidly.
Therefore, the carrier C has a characteristic that the decrease rate of the resistivity to the change of field strength in a field strength which is larger than the predetermined field strength is larger than the decrease rate of the resistivity to the change of field strength in a field strength which is smaller than the predetermined field strength. In addition, the carrier C also has a characteristic that the increase rate of the relative dielectric constant to the change of field strength in a field strength which is larger than the predetermined field strength is larger than the increase rate of the relative dielectric constant to the change of the field strength in a field strength which is smaller than the predetermined field strength.
It is considered that the above-mentioned changes of the physical property values are due to the following reasons.
For example, in case of a magnetic carrier having its core material formed of an electrically conductive material, similar to the high dielectric constant carrier A, an electrical path can be easily formed inside the magnetic carrier and between adjacent particles of the magnetic carrier upon application of a voltage. The electric physical property values (∈, ρ) are considered to change in accordance with the increasing field strength. On the other hand, in case of the carrier C according to the present invention, the core thereof has a porous structure formed of an electrically conductive material and filled with an electrically insulating resin, so the interior of the core includes the coexistence of an electrically insulating resin portion and an electrically conductive porous portion.
Here, it is considered that the flow of electric charge can be interrupted to some extent in a boundary between the electrically insulating resin portion and the electrically conductive porous portion. However, it is considered that when a limit value (in this case, a field strength of 2.6×104 (V/cm)) below which the electric charge flow can be interrupted is exceeded, a rapid change in the electric physical property values (∈, ρ) occurs due to the electrically conductive portion of the core. As stated above, the relative dielectric constant ∈ and the resistivity ρ of the magnetic carrier can be controlled by controlling the porous degree of the core and the resistance of the core material as well as the amount of resin such as silicone resin to be filled, the amount of resin of the coating resin, and so on. Also, it becomes possible to control the above-mentioned limit value.
In this example, the electric field strength E2D in the pull-back direction is 2.6×104 (V/cm), and it is featured that the resistivity ρ is large and the relative dielectric constant ∈ is small, up to the vicinity of this electric field strength E2D. The electric field strength E1L in the developing direction is 3.7×104 [V/cm], and in a region in which the changes in the physical properties are large, the resistivity ρ decreases greatly up to the same level as that of the carrier A, and the relative dielectric constant ∈ increases rapidly to a value which greatly exceeds the relative dielectric constant of the high dielectric constant carrier A.
Two-component developers used in the present invention were adjusted in such a manner that the amount of triboelectrification of the toner contained in each developer was identical or constant. Specifically, the above-mentioned mixing ratio of the non-magnetic toner and the magnetic carrier was made variable. In actuality, the percentage by weight of the non-magnetic toner with respect to the total weight of the non-magnetic toner and the magnetic carrier was in the range of 8%-10%. In addition, at this time, the amount of triboelectrification of the toner (hereinafter referred to as Q/M) was about −50 μC/g.
Here, reference will be made to a method for measuring the Q/M used.
A Faraday gauge 300 illustrated in
The amount of charge Q thus induced was measured, and the amount of charge Q measured was divided by a weight M of the toner in the inner cylinder 301 to provide a value of Q/M (μC/g). The measurements were made by the use of a measuring instrument “KEITHLEY 616 DIGITAL ELECTROMETER” manufactured by Keithley Instruments Inc.
Table 1 below illustrates the results of evaluations on individual charging rates and fogs obtained when the high dielectric constant carrier A, the low dielectric constant carrier B, and the carrier C according to the present invention were used under the above-mentioned conditions.
Here, a fog evaluation method will be described. The reflection density Ds of a white ground portion of an image part was measured by means of a reflection densitometer (SERISE 1200) manufactured by GretagMacbeth. On the other hand, the reflection density Dr of paper itself was measured similarly, and fog density was decided as follows.
Fog density (%)=Dr−Ds
Fog densities obtained were evaluated according to criteria listed below.
A: 0.5% or less . . . very good
B: 0.6-1% or less . . . good
C: 1-2.0% or less . . . allowable level
D: 2% or more . . . poor
Those magnetic carriers which satisfied both a required level of charging rate and a required level of fog were only the carrier C according to the present invention, as shown in Table 1.
In this second example, a study was carried out with magnetic carriers D through H being added, in addition those of the above-mentioned first example, in order to clarify the relation among the carrier physical property values (∈, ρ), the charging rate and the fog. The carriers D through H were prepared according to a production method similar to that for the carrier C. At this time, the relative dielectric constant ∈ and the resistivity ρ of each magnetic carrier were controlled in the following manner by controlling the porous degree of a core and the resistance of a core material as well as an amount of resin such as silicone resin to be filled, an amount of resin of a coating resin, and so on. The measurement results of the physical property values (∈, ∈0∈ρ), fogs and charging rates of the magnetic carriers A through H were as follows. The dielectric constant ∈0 of a vacuum is a constant value.
As shown in Table 2, those magnetic carriers which satisfied both an allowable level of fog and a charging rate of 90% or more were the carriers C, D and E.
The reason for this is considered as follows. Under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of fog were the carriers B, C, D, E, G and H. These magnetic carriers satisfied a relation of 20≦∈0∈ρ E2D (s·V/cm) in the field strength E2D (V/cm).
Therefore, for a non-image part (VD), the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large in the field strength E2D decided by the phase time T2 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the developer carrying member. The fog toner adhered to the non-image part can be collected due to this counter charge.
Next, under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of charging rate were the carriers C, D, E and F. These carriers satisfied a relation of ∈0∈ρ (s) 6.0×10−4 and a relation of 30≦∈ in the field strength E1L (V/cm). Therefore, the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently small in the field strength E1L applied to an image part (VL) for the phase time T1 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the image bearing member.
Thus by making the time constant ∈0∈ρ(s) equal to or more than 6.0×10−4, the counter charge is liable to reduce and it is possible to reduce the inhibition of movement of the toner due to the counter charge. Thereby the chargeability of the image part can be improved. In addition, because the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large, as making the relative dielectric constant ∈ equal to or more than 30, the electric field applied to the surroundings of the magnetic carrier becomes large, so the toner becomes liable to fly easily from the magnetic carrier. In addition, since the larger a value of a relative dielectric constant ∈ is and a electric field of the carrier becomes large, so that the toner becomes liable to fly easily from the magnetic carrier, in the viewpoint of the improvement of defective charging, there is no upper limit for the value of a relative dielectric constant ★. From the above, only the carriers C, D and E according to the present invention satisfy the scope of claim 1 of the present application.
In this third example, a study similar to that of the above-mentioned second example was made while fixedly keeping the field strength E1L to 3.7×104 [V/cm] but replacing the duty ratio and the peak to peak voltage Vpp of the second example with 70% and 1.33 kV, respectively, so as make the field strength E2D variable.
Specifically, a duty wave was used which has a frequency 5 kHz, a duty ratio of 70%, and a peak to peak voltage Vpp of 1.33 kV. The electric field strengths E1L, E2D decided by the developing bias, the bright potential VL and the dark potential VD were as follows: E1L=3.7×104 [V/cm], and E2D=1.9×104 [V/cm].
Table 3 illustrates the measurement results of the physical property values (∈, ∈0∈ρ), fogs and charging rates of the magnetic carriers A through G at this time.
As shown in Table 3, those magnetic carriers which satisfied both an allowable level of fog and a charging rate of 90% or more were the carriers C, D and E.
The reason for this is considered as follows. Under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of fog were the carriers B, C, D, E, G and H. These magnetic carriers satisfied a relation of 20≦∈0∈ρ E2D (s·V/cm) in the field strength E2D(V/cm). Therefore, for a non-image part (VD), the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large in the field strength E2D decided by the phase time T2 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the developer carrying member. The fog toner adhered to the non-image part can be collected due to this counter charge.
Next, under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of charging rate were the carriers C, D, E and F. These carriers satisfied a relation of ∈0∈ρ(s)≦6.0×10−4 and a relation of 30≦∈ in the field strength E1L (V/cm). Therefore, for an image part (VL), the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently small in the field strength E1L decided by the phase time T1 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the image bearing member. Accordingly, it is possible to reduce the inhibition of movement of the toner due to the counter charge, and hence to decrease the deterioration of chargeability. In addition, because the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large, the electric field applied to the surroundings of the magnetic carrier becomes large, so the toner becomes liable to fly easily from the magnetic carrier.
From the above, only the carriers C, D and E according to the present invention satisfy the scope of claim 1 of the present application.
In this fourth example, a study similar to that of the above-mentioned second example was made while fixedly keeping the field strength E1L to 3.7×104 [V/cm] but replacing the duty ratio and the peak to peak voltage Vpp of the second example with 80% and 1.16 kV, respectively, so as make the field strength E2D variable. Specifically, a duty wave was used which has a frequency 5 kHz, a duty ratio of 80%, and a peak to peak voltage Vpp of 1.33 kV. The electric field strengths E1L, E2D decided by the developing bias, the bright potential VL and the dark potential VD were as follows: E1L=3.7×104 [V/cm], and E2D=1.4×104 [V/cm].
At this time, the measurement results of the physical property values (∈, ∈0∈ρ), fogs and charging rates of the magnetic carriers A through G are as follows.
As shown in Table 4, those magnetic carriers which satisfied both an allowable level of fog and a charging rate of 90% or more were the carriers C, D and E.
The reason for this is considered as follows. Under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of fog were the carriers B, C, D, E, G and H. These magnetic carriers satisfied a relation of 20≦∈0∈ρ E2D (s·V/cm) in the field strength E2D (V/CM).
Therefore, for a non-image part (VD), the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large in the field strength E2D decided by the phase time T2 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the developer carrying member. Thus, the fog toner adhered to the non-image part can be collected due to this counter charge.
Next, under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of charging rate were the carriers C, D, E and F. These carriers satisfied a relation of ∈0∈ρ(s)≦6.0×10−4 and a relation of 30≦∈ in the field strength E1L (V/cm).
Therefore, the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently small in the field strength E1L applied to an image part (VL) for the phase time T1 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the image bearing member. Accordingly, it is possible to reduce the inhibition of movement of the toner due to the counter charge, and hence to decrease the deterioration of chargeability. In addition, because the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large, the electric field applied to the surroundings of the magnetic carrier becomes large, so the toner becomes liable to fly easily from the magnetic carrier.
From the above, only the carriers C, D and E according to the present invention satisfy the scope of claim 1 of the present application.
In this fifth example, a study similar to that of the above-mentioned second example was made by replacing the duty ratio and the peak to peak voltage Vpp of the second example with 60% and 0.85 kV, respectively, so as make the field strength E1L variable. Specifically, a duty wave was used which has a frequency 5 kHz, a duty ratio of 60%, and a peak to peak voltage Vpp of 0.85 kV. The electric field strengths E1D, E2D decided by the developing bias, the bright potential VL and the dark potential VD were as follows: E1L=2.3×104 [V/cm], and E2D=1.6×104 [V/cm]. The measurement results of the physical property values (∈, ∈0∈ρ), fogs and charging rates of the magnetic carriers I through L at this time were as shown in Table 5. The magnetic carriers I through L were also prepared according to a production method similar to that for the carrier C.
As shown in Table 5, those magnetic carriers which satisfied both an allowable level of fog and a charging rate of 90% or more were the carrier I.
The reason for this is considered as follows. Under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of fog were the carriers I, K and L. These magnetic carriers satisfied a relation of 20≦∈0ρ E2D (s·V/cm) in the field strength E2D (V/cm).
Therefore, for a non-image part (VD), the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large in the field strength of E2D decided by the phase time T2 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the developer carrying member. Accordingly, the fog toner adhered to the non-image part can be collected due to this counter charge.
Next, under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of charging rate were the carriers I and J. These carriers satisfied a relation of ∈0∈ρ(s)≦6.0×10−4 and a relation of 30≦∈ in the field strength E1L (V/cm).
Therefore, the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently small in the field strength of E1L applied to an image part (VL) for the phase time T1 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the image bearing member. Accordingly, it is possible to reduce the inhibition of movement of the toner due to the counter charge, and hence to decrease the deterioration of chargeability. In addition, because the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large, the electric field applied to the surroundings of the magnetic carrier becomes large, so the toner becomes liable to fly easily from the magnetic carrier.
From the above, only the carrier I according to the present invention satisfies the scope of claim 1 of the present application.
In this sixth example, a study similar to that of the above-mentioned fifth example was made while fixedly keeping the field strength E1L to 2.3×104 [V/cm] but replacing the duty ratio and the peak to peak voltage Vpp of the fifth example with 70% and 0.74 kV, respectively, so as make the field strength E2D variable.
Specifically, a duty wave was used which has a frequency 5 kHz, a duty ratio of 70%, and a peak to peak voltage Vpp of 0.74 kV. The electric field strengths E1L, E2D decided by the developing bias, the bright potential VL and the dark potential VD were as follows: E1L=2.3×104 [V/cm], and E2D=1.3×104 [V/cm].
The measurement results of the physical property values (∈, ∈0∈ρ), fogs and charging rates of the magnetic carriers I through L at this time were as shown in Table 6.
As shown in Table 6, those magnetic carriers which satisfied both an allowable level of fog and a charging rate of 90% or more were the carrier I.
The reason for this is considered as follows. Under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of fog were the carriers I, K and L. These magnetic carriers satisfied a relation of 20≦∈0∈ρ E2D (s·V/cm) in the field strength E2D (V/cm). Therefore, for a non-image part (VD), the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large in the field strength of E2D decided by the phase time T2 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the developer carrying member. Accordingly, the fog toner adhered to the non-image part can be collected due to this counter charge.
Next, under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of charging rate were the carriers I and J. These magnetic carriers satisfied a relation of ∈0∈ρ(s)≦6.0×10−4 and a relation of 30≦∈ in the field strength E1L (V/cm).
Therefore, the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently small in the field strength of E1L applied to an image part (VL) for the phase time T1 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the image bearing member. Accordingly, it is possible to reduce the inhibition of movement of the toner due to the counter charge, and hence to decrease the deterioration of chargeability. In addition, because the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large, the electric field applied to the surroundings of the magnetic carrier becomes large, so the toner becomes liable to fly easily from the magnetic carrier. From the above, only the carrier I according to the present invention satisfies the scope of claim 1 of the present application.
In this seventh example, a study similar to that of the above-mentioned fifth example was made while fixedly keeping the field strength E1L to 2.3×104 [V/cm] but replacing the duty ratio and the peak to peak voltage Vpp of the fifth example with 80% and 0.67 kV, respectively, so as make the field strength E2D variable. Specifically, a duty wave was used which has a frequency 5 kHz, a duty ratio of 80%, and a peak to peak voltage Vpp of 0.67 kV.
The electric field strengths E1L, E2D decided by the developing bias, the bright potential VL and the dark potential VD were as follows: E1L=2.3×104 [V/cm], and E2D=1.0×104 [V/cm]. The measurement results of the physical property values (∈, ∈0∈ρ), fogs and charging rates of the magnetic carriers I through L at this time were as shown in Table 7.
As shown in Table 7, those magnetic carriers which satisfied both an allowable level of fog and a charging rate of 90% or more were the carrier I.
The reason for this is considered as follows. Under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of fog were the carriers I, K and L. These magnetic carriers satisfied a relation of 20≦∈0∈ρ E2D (s·V/cm) in the field strength E2D (V/cm).
Therefore, for a non-image part (VD), the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large in the field strength of E20 decided by the phase time T2 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the developer carrying member. Accordingly, the fog toner adhered to the non-image part can be collected due to this counter charge.
Next, under the above-mentioned conditions, those magnetic carriers which satisfied the allowable level of charging rate were the carriers I and J. These carriers satisfied a relation of ∈0∈ρ(s) 6.0×10−4, and 30≦∈ in the field strength E1L (V/cm).
Therefore, the amount of counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier is sufficiently small in the field strength of E1L applied to an image part (VL) for the phase time T1 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the image bearing member. Accordingly, it is possible to reduce the inhibition of movement of the toner due to the counter charge, and hence to decrease the deterioration of chargeability. In addition, because the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier is sufficiently large, the electric field applied to the surroundings of the magnetic carrier becomes large, so the toner becomes liable to fly easily from the magnetic carrier. From the above, only the carrier I according to the present invention satisfies the scope of claim 1 of the present application.
As described in the foregoing, in the present invention, the relative dielectric constant ∈ and the resistivity ρ of the magnetic carrier is set in such a manner that when the duty ratio (Du) is in the range of 60≦duty ratio (Du) (%)≦80, the time constant ∈0 ∈ρp(s) of electric charge decay of the magnetic carrier in the field strength E2D becomes as follows: 20≦∈0∈ρ E2D (s·V/cm).
Accordingly, for the non-image part, the fog toner is collected by making use of the counter charge remaining on the magnetic carrier in the field strength E2D applied for the phase time T2 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the developer carrying member. As a result, the fog is improved.
In addition, making use of the fact that the relative dielectric constant ∈ and the resistivity ρ of the magnetic carrier have field strength dependence, the time constant ∈0∈p(s) of electric charge decay of the magnetic carrier in the field strength E1L (=(V1−VL)/(SD gap)) (V/cm) is controlled so as to satisfy the following relations: ∈0∈ρ(s) 6.0×10−4, and 30≦∈. That is, the relative dielectric constant ∈ and the resistivity ρ of the magnetic carrier are controlled so as to satisfy these relations.
As a result, in the field strength E1L applied to the image part (VL) for the phase time T1 of the developing bias for which the toner is caused to move in the direction of the image bearing member, it is possible to reduce the inhibition of movement of the toner due to the counter charge, and hence to decrease the deterioration of chargeability. In addition, by making the relative dielectric constant ∈ of the magnetic carrier equal to or less than 30 (i.e., 30≦∈), the electric field applied to the surroundings of the magnetic carrier becomes large, so the toner becomes liable to fly easily from the magnetic carrier.
As described above, the factors ∈, ∈ρ of the magnetic carrier were controlled within desired ranges in the field strength E2D (=(V2−VD)/(SD gap)) (V/cm), which decides the fog, and in the field strength E1L (=(V1−VL)/(SD gap)) (V/cm), which decides chargeability. As a result, defective charging can be improved without deteriorating the fog, in particular for the image bearing member of high electrostatic capacitance. Accordingly, it becomes possible to provide image outputs while making high picture quality and high stability compatible with each other.
In addition, the electric field strength E1L in the developing direction was set to 3.7×104 (V/cm) in the first through fourth examples, and was set to 2.3×104 (V/cm) in the fifth through seventh examples, and a preferred range of the electric field strength E1L is set for the following reasons. For an upper limit of the electric field strength E1L, it is necessary to set the upper limit to 4.2×104 (i.e., E1L (V/cm) 4.2×104) so as to prevent the occurrence of flaws on the image bearing member due to discharging.
Also, for a lower limit of the electric field strength E1L, it is necessary to set the lower limit to 2.0×104 (i.e., 2.0×104≦E1L (V/cm)) so as to prevent the deterioration of developability.
While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-102084, filed on Apr. 10, 2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-102084 | Apr 2008 | JP | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5678130 | Enomoto et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 6040102 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6278856 | Yamamoto | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6321057 | Yamamoto | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6337966 | Yamamoto | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6381434 | Yamamoto | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6564027 | Haraguchi et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6757511 | Sugimoto et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 7471909 | Haraguchi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7715744 | Miyazawa et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7773921 | Fujishima et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 20070048649 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071472 | Kubo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20080025765 | Okada | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152396 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20090123856 | Hotta et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-284523 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2002-116582 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002-258587 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2005-215626 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2006-259010 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2007-183592 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100209147 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/JP2009/057402 | Apr 2009 | US |
| Child | 12771539 | US |
