Patent Application
20200241441
This application is based on and claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-013794 filed on Jan. 30, 2019, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure relates to an image forming apparatus in which AC-type biasing is adopted for charging or development.
An image forming apparatus of an electrophotographic type employs a charger of a contact type that performs electrostatic charging by bringing a charging member having a voltage applied to it into contact with the surface of an image carrying member (to-be-charged member) such as a photosensitive drum. Electrostatic charging of a to-be-charged member by use of a charger of a contact type divides into DC charging and AC charging. In DC charging, as a charging bias, only a direct-current voltage Vdc is applied to the to-be-charged member to electrostatically charge the to-be-charged member. On the other hand, in AC charging, a charging bias having an alternating-current voltage Vac superposed on the direct-current voltage Vdc is applied to the to-be-charged member to electrostatically charge the to-be-charged member. AC charging is favored in recent years because, as compared with DC charging, it is effective in achieving uniform charging owing to the alternating-current component suppressing the variation of the charging voltage.
In AC charging, a charging bias that contains an alternating-current voltage Vac is applied to the to-be-charged member. This leads to the known problem of image defects in which interference fringes appear in the developed image due to the difference between the alternating-current frequency of the charging bias (in the present disclosure, referred to also as the “charging alternating-current frequency”) and the alternating-current frequency of the developing bias (in the present disclosure, referred to also as the “developing alternating-current frequency”) that is applied to the developer carrying member in the developing device.
As a solution, in one known configuration, prevention of the interference fringes is attempted by variably controlling the charging alternating-current frequency while keeping the developing alternating-current frequency in a frequency ratio of a multiple of an integer to the charging alternating-current frequency.
According to one aspect of the present disclosure, an image forming apparatus includes: a charging device that applies to a charging member a charging bias having a charging alternating-current voltage superposed on a charging direct-current voltage and that brings the charging member close to or into contact with an image carrying member to electrostatically charge the surface of the image carrying member; an electrostatic latent image forming device that forms an electrostatic latent image on the surface of the image carrying member electrostatically charged by the charging device; a developing device that develops the electrostatic latent image on the surface of the image carrying member with a developing bias having a developing alternating-current voltage superposed on a developing direct-current voltage; and a bias controller that varies both a charging alternating-current frequency, which is the frequency of the charging alternating-current voltage, and a developing alternating-current frequency, which is the frequency of the developing alternating-current voltage. When a region of the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies in which interference fringes appear in a developed image due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies is taken as a variation region and the variation speeds of the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies in the variation region are taken as a first and a second variation speed respectively, the bias controller varies the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies such that one of the first and second variation speeds is a positive-number multiple of the other.
This and other objects of the present disclosure, and the specific benefits obtained according to the present disclosure, will become apparent from the description of embodiments which follows.
In a configuration that attempts to prevent interference fringes by variably controlling a charging alternating-current frequency while keeping a developing alternating-current frequency in a frequency ratio of a multiple of an integer to the charging alternating-current frequency, to suppress image defects due to interference, it is necessary to perform highly accurate control such that the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies are in constant proportions. This requires a high-performance controller, and leads to increased cost of the circuit board on which the controller and its peripheral components (e.g., a storage) are mounted. Moreover, the need to design a circuit board specialized for highly accurate control leads to narrow design tolerances in the circuit board. Thus, considering the cost of and the design tolerances in the circuit board, it is desirable to suppress, by simple control, the image defects due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies.
The present disclosure provides an image forming apparatus that can suppress, with simple control, the image defects due to interference between a charging alternating-current frequency and a developing alternating-current frequency in a configuration where the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies are both varied. Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present disclosure will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[Outline of the Structure of an Image Forming Apparatus]
The photosensitive drum 5 is, for example, an amorphous silicon photoconductor that has an amorphous silicon layer, which is a positively chargeable photoconductor, as a photosensitive layer formed by deposition on the surface of a drum base tube made of aluminum, and has a diameter of about 30 mm. The photosensitive drum 5 is configured to be driven to rotate at a constant speed about a pivot shaft by a drum driver (not shown).
During Image forming operation, the photosensitive drum 5 rotating counter-clockwise is electrostatically charged by the charging device 4 uniformly. Subsequently, with a laser beam based on document image data and shone from the exposure unit 7, an electrostatic latent image is formed on the photosensitive drum 5. Then, developer (hereinafter referred to as toner) is attached to the electrostatic latent image by the developing device 8 to form a toner image. The document image data mentioned above is transmitted from a host device such as a personal computer (not shown). Toner is supplied to the developing device 8 from a toner container 9.
On the other hand, toward the photosensitive drum 5 on which the toner image has been formed, a sheet (recording medium) is conveyed from a sheet feed cassette 10 or from a manual feeding device 11 via a sheet conveying passage 12 and a pair of registration rollers 13. Then, by the transfer roller 14, the toner image formed on the surface of the photosensitive drum 5 is transferred to the sheet. The toner that remains on the surface of the photosensitive drum 5 is removed by the cleaning device 19. Then, the electric charge that remains on the surface of the photosensitive drum 5 is removed by the destaticizing device 6.
The sheet having the toner image transferred to it is separated from the photosensitive drum 5, and is conveyed to a fixing device 15, where the toner image is fixed. The sheet having passed through the fixing device 15 is conveyed through a sheet conveying passage 16 to an upper part of the image forming apparatus 100, and is discharged by a pair of discharge rollers 17 onto a discharge tray 18.
[Details of the Image Forming Section]
Next, the image forming section P mentioned above will be described in detail.
The charging bias V1 is generated by superposing a charging alternating-current voltage V1ac on a charging direct-current voltage V1dc. Used as the alternating-current component of the charging bias V1 is, for example, a sinusoidal wave. The frequency of the alternating-current component of the charging bias V1 can be varied within a desired frequency width per unit period under the control of a bias controller 33 (see
The exposure unit 7 performs, based on the document image data, exposure of the surface of the photosensitive drum 5 electrostatically charged by the charging device 4, and thereby forms an electrostatic latent image on the surface of the photosensitive drum 5. The exposure here is achieved by a method in which laser light is reflected by a rotating polygon mirror to scan the surface of the photosensitive drum 5. Accordingly, on the surface of the photosensitive drum 5, the electrostatic latent image is formed at a frequency that reflects the scanning pitch. In the present disclosure, this frequency is referred to also as the latent image frequency. The scanning pitch mentioned above corresponds to the resolution of the electrostatic latent image, and therefore the latent image frequency can be said to be a frequency that defines the resolution of the electrostatic latent image. The exposure unit 7 as an electrostatic latent image forming device can be any that can form an electrostatic latent image on the photosensitive drum 5 at a constant period through digital processing, and can be built with, for example, a MEMS or an LED array.
The developing device 8 has a developing roller 8a. The developing roller 8a feeds the toner stored in the toner container 9 in the developing device 8 to the photosensitive drum 5, and thereby develops the electrostatic latent image formed on the surface of the photosensitive drum 5. The toner that is fed from the developing roller 8a to the photosensitive drum 5 is, for example, toner having two parts by weight of titanium oxide (with a particle diameter of 0.1 μm and a resistance of 1×107 Ωcm) as an abrasive and 0.5 parts by weight of hydrophobic silica as a flow enhancer added to 100 parts by weight of toner particles.
Here, the feeding of toner from the developing roller 8a to the photosensitive drum 5 is achieved by the application of a developing bias to the developing roller 8a and the resulting formation of an electric field between the developing roller 8a and the photosensitive drum 5. The developing bias is generated by superposing together a developing direct-current voltage V2dc and a developing alternating-current voltage V2ac. Used as the alternating-current component of the developing bias is, for example, a rectangular wave. The frequency of the alternating-current component of the developing bias V2 can be varied within a desired frequency width per unit period under the control of the bias controller 33. The toner image developed on the photosensitive drum 5 is transferred to a sheet S by the transfer roller 14.
The cleaning device 19 includes a cleaning roller 19a made of foamed polyurethane, a cleaning blade 19b, and a toner collector 19c. The cleaning roller 19a and the cleaning blade 19b are arranged each in contact with the photosensitive drum 5. The toner collector 19c collects the toner removed from the photosensitive drum 5 by the cleaning roller 19a and the cleaning blade 19b. The cleaning roller 19a rotates with toner containing an abrasive present at where the cleaning roller 19a makes contact with the photosensitive drum 5; thus, the cleaning roller 19a rubs against the photosensitive drum 5 and thereby cleans the surface of the photosensitive drum 5.
[Controlling the Charging Bias and the Developing Bias]
Next, how the charging bias V1 and the developing bias V2 mentioned above are controlled will be described.
The storage 34 includes, for example, a ROM and a RAM, and stores a control program for operating the bias controller 33. Based on the control program, the bias controller 33 generates, for output to the charging bias generation circuit 31, a control signal (charging control signal) for generating the charging bias V1, and also generates, for output to the developing bias generation circuit 32, a control signal (development control signal) for generating the developing bias V2. The bias controller 33 so configured is, for example, built with a central processing unit (CPU).
The charging bias generation circuit 31 is a circuit that generates, based on the charging control signal from the bias controller 33, the charging bias V1 that is applied to the charging roller 4a in the charging device 4. The charging bias generation circuit 31 includes a charging direct-current constant-voltage power supply 31a and a charging alternating-current constant-voltage power supply 31b. The charging direct-current constant-voltage power supply 31a generates the charging direct-current voltage V1dc based on the above-mentioned charging control signal. The charging alternating-current constant-voltage power supply 31b generates the charging alternating-current voltage V1ac based on the charging control signal. In the charging bias generation circuit 31, the charging direct-current voltage V1dc and the charging alternating-current voltage V1ac are superposed together and thereby the charging bias V1 is generated. The charging roller 4a is electrostatically charged by being fed with the charging bias V1 from the charging bias generation circuit 31.
The developing bias generation circuit 32 is a circuit that generates, based on the development control signal from the bias controller 33, the developing bias V2 that is applied to the developing roller 8a in the developing device 8. The developing bias generation circuit 32 includes a developing direct-current constant-voltage power supply 32a and a developing alternating-current constant-voltage power supply 32b. The developing direct-current constant-voltage power supply 32a generates the developing direct-current voltage V2dc based on the above-mentioned development control signal. The developing alternating-current constant-voltage power supply 32b generates the developing alternating-current voltage V2ac based on the development control signal. In the developing bias generation circuit 32, the developing direct-current voltage V2dc and the developing alternating-current voltage V2ac are superposed together and thereby the developing bias V2 is generated. The developing bias V2 is applied to the developing roller 8a.
In the embodiment, the bias controller 33 performs control in which it varies both the charging alternating-current frequency, which is the frequency of the alternating-current component (charging alternating-current voltage V1ac) of the charging bias V1, and the developing alternating-current frequency, which is the frequency of the alternating-current component (developing alternating-current voltage V2ac) of the developing bias V2. Specifically, when the region of the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies in which the interference fringes appear in the developed image due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies (i.e., the range in which the interference fringes appear) is taken as a variation region and the variation speeds of the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies in the variation region are taken as a first and a second variation speed respectively, then the bias controller 33 varies, in the variation region, the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies such that one of the first and second variation speeds is a positive-number multiple of the other (i.e., n times the other, where n is a positive integer of one or more).
Controlling the variation speeds (first and second variation speeds) of the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies in the variation region as described above helps reduce interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies in the variation region, and thus makes the interference fringes due to the interference less visually recognizable. Thus, the control of the two frequencies no longer requires such high accuracy as conventionally required to keep the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies in constant proportions. Thus, it is possible to suppress the image defects due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies with simpler control than conventionally practiced (with simple control where the variation speeds of the two frequencies are controlled).
Performing highly accurate control as conventionally practiced requires a high-performance (high-throughput) controller and a large-capacity storage, and this may cause concern for increased cost of the circuit board on which the controller and the storage are mounted. In contrast, the embodiment requires no such highly accurate control, and thus does not cause concern for increased cost of the circuit board 35 on which the bias controller 33 and the storage 34 are mounted. Nor is it necessary to design a circuit board 35 specialized for highly accurate control, and this allows wider design tolerances in the circuit board 35.
Incidentally, keeping the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies equal at the same frequency without varying either of them eliminates the image defects due to interference. However, the higher the rank of a model on the product line, the higher one of the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies; then the other too requires suitable control and a suitable circuit board design. This leads to increased cost of and narrower design tolerances in the circuit board 35.
Out of the considerations discussed above, the above-described control in this embodiment can be said to be more advantageous, in suppressing an increase in the cost of the circuit board 35 and in widening design tolerances in the circuit board 35, than the conventional control, where the two frequencies are kept in constant proportions.
It is particularly preferable that the bias controller 33 vary the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies such that the first and second variation speeds are equal. Making equal the variation speeds of the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies in the variation region makes the variable control of the two frequencies easier. Thus, it is possible to suppress, with simpler control, the image defects due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies.
Assuming that the center frequency of the charging alternating-current frequency is 2700 Hz, consider a case where the charging alternating-current frequency is varied within ±200 Hz of the center frequency. Likewise, assuming that the center frequency of the developing alternating-current frequency is 2700 Hz, consider a case where the developing alternating-current frequency is varied within ±200 Hz of the center frequency. It has been known from various studies that, in a case where the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies are varied under such conditions, when the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies are in the range from 2650 to 2750 Hz, ordinarily (i.e., if the control according to the embodiment is not performed) visually recognizable the interference fringes appear in the developed image due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies.
During the testing, the linear velocity of the photosensitive drum 5 was 152 mm/sec, the distance between the developing roller 8a and the photosensitive drum 5 was 0.3 mm, and the linear velocity ratio of the developing roller 8a to photosensitive drum 5 was 1.62; the charging direct-current voltage V1dc was 350 V, the charging alternating-current voltage V1ac was 1 kV on a peak-to-peak Vpp basis, the developing direct-current voltage V2dc was 180 V, and the developing alternating-current voltage V2ac was 1500 V on a peak-to-peak Vpp basis.
Under the conditions mentioned above, the charging alternating-current frequency was varied, by spectrum spreading, in the range (variation region) from 2650 to 2750 Hz, across an amount of variation of 50 Hz for a duration of 10 msec. That is, the variation speed (first variation speed) of the charging alternating-current frequency in the variation region was 50 Hz/10 msec.
In Table 1, interference was evaluated as follows: when 80 or more in 100 people who saw an image recognized the interference fringes, interference was evaluated to be present (“Yes”); when 79 or less in 100 people who saw an image recognized the interference fringes, interference was evaluated to be absent (“No”).
For different combinations of the first and second variation speeds, simulations of interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies were performed, and the variation of the intensity of the composite wave of the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies was studied. The results are shown in
Also in cases where the variation speed (second variation speed) of the developing alternating-current frequency in the variation region was set to 50 Hz/10 msec and the variation speed (first variation speed) of the charging alternating-current frequency was selected among several speeds, with respect to interference, results similar to those in Table 1 and
Thus, it can be said that, by varying the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies such that one of the first and second variation speeds is a positive-number multiple of the other, it is possible to suppress the image defects due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies, and that making the first and second variation speeds equal is particularly effective in suppressing such image defects.
(Variable Control of the Charging Alternating-Current Frequency with Consideration Given to the Rotation Speed of Photosensitive Drum)
When, in a situation where the interference fringes appear in the developed image due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies, the recognizable minimum pitch of the interference fringes is W1 (mm), the width of the above-mentioned variation region is X1 (Hz), the rotation speed of the photosensitive drum 5 is Y1 (mm/sec), and the first variation speed of the charging alternating-current frequency in the variation region is Z1 (Hz/sec), then it is preferable that the bias controller 33 vary the charging alternating-current frequency at a first variation speed Z1 (Hz/sec) that fulfills
|Z1|>X1/(W1/Y1). (1)
Conditional Formula (1) above defines an adequate range of the first variation speed Z1, with consideration given to the rotation speed Y1 of the photosensitive drum 5, for reducing interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies. That is, fulfilling Conditional Formula (1) makes it possible to vary the charging alternating-current frequency at an adequate first variation speed Z1 in accordance with the rotation speed Y1 of the photosensitive drum 5. It is thus possible to reduce interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies in the variation region, and thereby to suppress the image defects due to the interference.
For example, if it is assumed that the recognizable minimum pitch W1 of the interference fringes is 2.81 mm, that the width X1 of the variation region is a range of ±2% about the center frequency of the developing alternating-current frequency, namely 2700×1.02−2700×0.98=108 Hz, and that the rotation speed Y1 of the photosensitive drum 5 is Y1=152 mm/sec, then X1/(W1/Y1)=108/(2.81/152)=5842 Hz/sec (=58.42 Hz/10 msec). In this case, by varying the charging alternating-current frequency at a first variation speed Z1 higher than 5842 Hz/sec, it is possible to vary the charging alternating-current frequency appropriately with respect to the rotation of the photosensitive drum 5 at the rotation speed Y1, and thereby to suppress the image defects due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies.
(Variable Control of the Developing Alternating-Current Frequency with Consideration Given to the Rotation Speed of Photosensitive Drum)
When, in a situation where the interference fringes appear in the developed image due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies, the recognizable minimum pitch of the interference fringes is W2 (mm), the width of the above-mentioned variation region is X2 (Hz), the rotation speed of the photosensitive drum 5 is Y2 (mm/sec), and the second variation speed of the developing alternating-current frequency in the variation region is Z2 (Hz/sec), then it is preferable that the bias controller 33 vary the developing alternating-current frequency at a second variation speed Z2 (Hz/sec) that fulfills
|Z2|>X2/(W2/Y2). (2)
Conditional Formula (2) above defines an adequate range of the second variation speed Z2, with consideration given to the rotation speed Y2 of the photosensitive drum 5, for reducing interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies. That is, fulfilling Conditional Formula (2) makes it possible to vary the developing alternating-current frequency at an adequate second variation speed Z2 in accordance with the rotation speed Y2 of the photosensitive drum 5. It is thus possible to reduce interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies in the variation region, and thereby to suppress the image defects due to the interference.
For example, if it is assumed that the recognizable minimum pitch W2 of the interference fringes is 2.81 mm, that the width X2 of the variation region is a range of ±2% about the center frequency of the charging alternating-current frequency, namely 2700×1.02−2700×0.98=108 Hz, and the rotation speed Y2 of the photosensitive drum 5 is Y2=152 mm/sec, then X2/(W2/Y2)=108/(2.81/152)=5842 Hz/sec (=58.42 Hz/10 msec). In this case, by varying the developing alternating-current frequency at a second variation speed Z2 higher than 5842 Hz/sec, it is possible to vary the developing alternating-current frequency appropriately with respect to the rotation of the photosensitive drum 5 at the rotation speed Y2, and thereby to suppress the image defects due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies.
(Variable Control of the Charging Alternating-Current Frequency with Consideration Given to the Latent Image Frequency)
If there is a deviation between the charging alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency, which defines the resolution of the electrostatic latent image formed on the photosensitive drum 5, the charging alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency may interfere with each other to produce the interference fringes in the developed image. Also in that case, it is possible, by controlling the charging alternating-current frequency on a principle similar to that of the above-described control based on Conditional Formula (1), to suppress the image defects due to interference between the charging alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency. Specifically, control then proceeds as described below.
While the interference fringes that appear in the developed image due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies are referred to as first interference fringes, interference fringes that appear in the developed image due to interference between the latent image frequency and the charging alternating-current frequency are referred to as second interference fringes. When the recognizable minimum pitch of the second interference fringes is W3 (mm), the width of the variation region of the charging alternating-current frequency when the second interference fringes appear in the image is X3 (Hz), the rotation speed of the photosensitive drum 5 is Y3 (mm/sec), and the variation speed of the charging alternating-current frequency in the variation region is a third variation speed Z3 (Hz/sec), then it is preferable that the bias controller 33 vary the charging alternating-current frequency at a third variation speed Z3 (Hz/sec) that fulfills
|Z3|>X3/(W3/Y3). (3)
Conditional Formula (3) above defines an adequate range of the third variation speed Z3 of the charging alternating-current frequency, with consideration given to the rotation speed Y3 of the photosensitive drum 5, for reducing interference between the charging alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency. That is, fulfilling Conditional Formula (3) makes it possible to vary the charging alternating-current frequency at an adequate third variation speed Z3 in accordance with the rotation speed Y3 of the photosensitive drum 5. This helps reduce interference between the charging alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency in the variation region. It is thus possible to suppress not only the image defects due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies as mentioned previous but also the image defects due to interference between the charging alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency.
For example, consider a case where, as shown in
Latent Image Frequency (Hz)=1/Line Interval (sec)=1/0.0005565≈1795.
For example, if it is assumed that the recognizable minimum pitch W3 of the second interference fringes is 3 mm, that the width X3 of the variation region is from 1750 Hz to 1850 Hz, that is, 100 Hz, and that the rotation speed Y3 of the photosensitive drum 5 is Y1=152 mm/sec, then X3/(W3/Y3)=100/(3/152)=5067 Hz/sec. In this case, by varying the charging alternating-current frequency at a third variation speed Z3 higher than 5067 Hz/sec, it is possible to vary the charging alternating-current frequency appropriately with respect to the rotation speed of the photosensitive drum 5 at the rotation speed Y3, and thereby to reduce interference between the charging alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency in the variation region. It is thus possible to suppress the image defects due to interference between the charging alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency.
In a case where the variation region of the charging alternating-current frequency when the first interference fringes appear in an image and the variation region of the charging alternating-current frequency when the second interference fringes appear in the image overlap, in the region (frequency variation range) where they overlap, the charging alternating-current frequency can be varied at a variation speed that fulfills Conditional Formulae (1) and (3) simultaneously, that is, at the higher of Z1 and Z3.
(Variable Control of the Developing Alternating-Current Frequency with Consideration Given to the Latent Image Frequency)
Likewise, if there is a deviation between the developing alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency, the developing alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency may interfere with each other to produce the interference fringes in the developed image. Also in that case, it is possible, by controlling the developing alternating-current frequency on a principle similar to that of the above-described control based on Conditional Formula (2), to suppress the image defects due to interference between the developing alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency. Specifically, control then proceeds as described below.
While the interference fringes that appear in the developed image due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies are referred to as first interference fringes, interference fringes that appear in the developed image due to interference between the latent image frequency and the developing alternating-current frequency are referred to as third interference fringes. When the recognizable minimum pitch of the third interference fringes is W4 (mm), the width of the variation region when the third interference fringes appear in the image is X4 (Hz), the rotation speed of the photosensitive drum 5 is Y4 (mm/sec), and the variation speed of the developing alternating-current frequency in the variation region is a fourth variation speed Z (Hz/sec), then it is preferable that the bias controller 33 vary the developing alternating-current frequency at a fourth variation speed Z4 (Hz/sec) that fulfills
|Z4|>X4/(W4/Y4). (4)
Conditional Formula (4) above defines an adequate range of the fourth variation speed Z4 of the developing alternating-current frequency, with consideration given to the rotation speed Y4 of the photosensitive drum 5, for reducing interference between the developing alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency. That is, fulfilling Conditional Formula (4) makes it possible to vary the developing alternating-current frequency at an adequate fourth variation speed Z4 in accordance with the rotation speed Y4 of the photosensitive drum 5. This helps reduce interference between the developing alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency in the variation region. It is thus possible to suppress not only the image defects due to interference between the charging and developing alternating-current frequencies as mentioned previously but also the image defects due to interference between the developing alternating-current frequency and the latent image frequency.
For example, consider a case where, as shown in
In a case where the variation region of the developing alternating-current frequency when the first interference fringes appear in an image and the variation region of the developing alternating-current frequency when the third interference fringes appear in the image overlap, in the region (frequency variation range) where they overlap, the developing alternating-current frequency can be varied at a variation speed that fulfills Conditional Formulae (2) and (4) simultaneously, that is, at the higher of Z2 and Z4.
[Modifications]
The above embodiment deals with control in which a charging alternating-current frequency and a developing alternating-current frequency are varied as applied to a structure where a charging roller 4a is in contact with a photosensitive drum 5. Instead, control similar to that of the embodiment can be applied to a structure where a charging roller 4a and a photosensitive drum 5 are arranged with no contact between them (close together). Also then, effects similar to those of the embodiment can be obtained.
Although the above embodiment deals with an example where an amorphous silicon photoconductor is used as the photosensitive drum 5, also in a case where, for example, an organic photoconductor (OPC) is used, control similar to that in the embodiment brings effects similar to those of the embodiment.
Although the above embodiment deals with control in which a charging alternating-current frequency and a developing alternating-current frequency are varied as applied to a monochrome printer, control according to the embodiment can be applied to various image forming apparatuses such as monochrome copiers, color copiers, color printers, facsimile machines, multifunction peripherals, etc. Also then, effects similar to those of the embodiment can be obtained.
The present disclosure find applications in image forming apparatuses such as monochrome printers.
The description of an embodiment of the present disclosure given above is not meant to limit the scope of the present disclosure; what is disclosed herein can be implemented with any modifications made within the spirit of the present disclosure.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-013794 | Jan 2019 | JP | national |
